Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-09 Thread Dave Young
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Larry Fingerlarry.fin...@lwfinger.net wrote:
 Michael Buesch wrote:
 On Tuesday 08 September 2009 15:47:32 Dave Young wrote:
 I tested wireless-testing b43 driver, but got Fatal DMA error
 then the controller keep restarting...

 Please tell what I can provide or test, Thanks.

 Is this a regression? If so, please bisect.

 It is something specific to his system as I don't see anything like
 this. In addition, there are some users on the openSUSE forums that
 have implemented the latest compat-wireless and switched away from
 Broadcom wl to b43 on their LP PHY devices. So far, no complaints from
 them.

 Please reboot so that we see the ssb output as well. Use the command

 dmesg | egrep ssb|b43

 That way we will be able to see exactly what kind of device you have
 and what revisions are in it. AFAIK, the testing to date has been
 limited to Rev 1 PHYs and Rev 2 radios.

I use a public pc and I have no lan access for my laptop, so just hand
copy something:

b43-pci-bridge :0c:00.0: PCI INT A - GSI 17 (level, low) - IRQ 17
b43-pci-bridge :0c:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
ssb SInics Silicon Backplane found on PCI device :0c:00.0
b43-phy0: Broadcom 4312 WLAN found (core revision 15)
b43-phy0 debug: Found PHY: Analog 6, Type 5, Revision 1
b43-phy0 debug: Found Radio: Manuf 0x17F, Version 0x2062, Revision 2


 Larry






-- 
Regards
dave
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-09 Thread Dave Young
2009/9/8 Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com:
 Do you have the threaded-IRQ patches applied?
Could you point the url? where can I get them?

 Also, what card is this?
 (BCM4312?) Try upgrading your firmare (use v478 or the new v5xx one).


Yes, BCM4312, I use the firmware according to the guide in
linux-wireless web page, where is the v5xx, could you tell more?

-- 
Regards
dave
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-09 Thread Dave Young
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Michael Bueschm...@bu3sch.de wrote:
 On Tuesday 08 September 2009 15:47:32 Dave Young wrote:
 I tested wireless-testing b43 driver, but got Fatal DMA error
 then the controller keep restarting...

 Please tell what I can provide or test, Thanks.

 Is this a regression? If so, please bisect.

Not sure, It's the first time for me to use b43 with the lp-phy
because I happend to know it is supported now.

If it's a regression I can do bisection.


 --
 Greetings, Michael.




-- 
Regards
dave
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-09 Thread Dave Young
2009/9/9 Larry Finger larry.fin...@lwfinger.net:
 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Larry Fingerlarry.fin...@lwfinger.net 
 wrote:
 Your PHY and your radio are the same as mine. In fact, the one thing I
 noticed is that you are using i386 architecture, whereas mine is
 x86_64. I have not tested with i386.

 Has anyone run the LP PHY modifications with 32-bit architecture?

 Yes, me. (With the exact same card as John.)

 Is it a maximum memory issue? How much for you?

1G memory for me.


 John and Dave: Same question.

 Larry




-- 
Regards
dave
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-09 Thread Dave Young
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Dave Younghidave.darks...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Michael Bueschm...@bu3sch.de wrote:
 On Tuesday 08 September 2009 15:47:32 Dave Young wrote:
 I tested wireless-testing b43 driver, but got Fatal DMA error
 then the controller keep restarting...

 Please tell what I can provide or test, Thanks.

 Is this a regression? If so, please bisect.

 Not sure, It's the first time for me to use b43 with the lp-phy
 because I happend to know it is supported now.

 If it's a regression I can do bisection.

Add larry/john/Markus to cc-list

News:

With following config option set to y, b43 works happily now.
CONFIG_B43_FORCE_PIO=y



 --
 Greetings, Michael.




 --
 Regards
 dave




-- 
Regards
dave
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-08 Thread Gábor Stefanik
Do you have the threaded-IRQ patches applied? Also, what card is this?
(BCM4312?) Try upgrading your firmare (use v478 or the new v5xx one).
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-08 Thread Gábor Stefanik
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:50 PM, John Daikerdaikerj...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 09/08/2009 07:54 AM, Larry Finger wrote:

 Michael Buesch wrote:

 On Tuesday 08 September 2009 15:47:32 Dave Young wrote:

 I tested wireless-testing b43 driver, but got Fatal DMA error
 then the controller keep restarting...

 Please tell what I can provide or test, Thanks.

 Is this a regression? If so, please bisect.

 It is something specific to his system as I don't see anything like
 this. In addition, there are some users on the openSUSE forums that
 have implemented the latest compat-wireless and switched away from
 Broadcom wl to b43 on their LP PHY devices. So far, no complaints from
 them.

 Please reboot so that we see the ssb output as well. Use the command

 dmesg | egrep ssb|b43

 That way we will be able to see exactly what kind of device you have
 and what revisions are in it. AFAIK, the testing to date has been
 limited to Rev 1 PHYs and Rev 2 radios.

 Larry


 I can confirm the same issue.  I have a HP Mini 1116NR with a Broadcom 4312.
  Looks to be a PHY 1, Radio 2:

 --snip--
 [  456.165296] b43-phy0 debug: Found PHY: Analog 6, Type 5, Revision 1
 [  456.165364] b43-phy0 debug: Found Radio: Manuf 0x17F, Version 0x2062,
 Revision 2
 --snip--

 I've attached the output of 'dmesg | egrep ssb|b43', my kernel config, and
 lspci -vv and lspci -nn

 Note: With the dmesg output, I had unloaded the b43 module previous
 'modprobe -r b43' and then loaded it again with debug output: 'modprobe b43
 verbose=3'

 John Daiker


Again, please test with v478 or v5xx firmware.

-- 
Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-)
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-08 Thread Michael Buesch
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 19:50:25 John Daiker wrote:
 On 09/08/2009 07:54 AM, Larry Finger wrote:
  Michael Buesch wrote:
  On Tuesday 08 September 2009 15:47:32 Dave Young wrote:
  I tested wireless-testing b43 driver, but got Fatal DMA error
  then the controller keep restarting...
 
  Please tell what I can provide or test, Thanks.
 
  Is this a regression? If so, please bisect.
 
  It is something specific to his system as I don't see anything like
  this. In addition, there are some users on the openSUSE forums that
  have implemented the latest compat-wireless and switched away from
  Broadcom wl to b43 on their LP PHY devices. So far, no complaints from
  them.
 
  Please reboot so that we see the ssb output as well. Use the command
 
  dmesg | egrep ssb|b43
 
  That way we will be able to see exactly what kind of device you have
  and what revisions are in it. AFAIK, the testing to date has been
  limited to Rev 1 PHYs and Rev 2 radios.
 
  Larry
 
 
 I can confirm the same issue.  I have a HP Mini 1116NR with a Broadcom 4312.  
 Looks to be a PHY 1, Radio 2:
 
 --snip--
 [  456.165296] b43-phy0 debug: Found PHY: Analog 6, Type 5, Revision 1
 [  456.165364] b43-phy0 debug: Found Radio: Manuf 0x17F, Version 0x2062, 
 Revision 2
 --snip--
 
 I've attached the output of 'dmesg | egrep ssb|b43', my kernel config, and 
 lspci -vv and lspci -nn
 
 Note: With the dmesg output, I had unloaded the b43 module previous 'modprobe 
 -r b43' and then loaded it again with debug output: 'modprobe b43 verbose=3'
 
 John Daiker
 

To ask the question once again: Is this a regression?
This is a critical question to track down the bug.

-- 
Greetings, Michael.
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-08 Thread Michael Buesch
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 20:06:49 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:50 PM, John Daikerdaikerj...@gmail.com wrote:
  On 09/08/2009 07:54 AM, Larry Finger wrote:
 
  Michael Buesch wrote:
 
  On Tuesday 08 September 2009 15:47:32 Dave Young wrote:
 
  I tested wireless-testing b43 driver, but got Fatal DMA error
  then the controller keep restarting...
 
  Please tell what I can provide or test, Thanks.
 
  Is this a regression? If so, please bisect.
 
  It is something specific to his system as I don't see anything like
  this. In addition, there are some users on the openSUSE forums that
  have implemented the latest compat-wireless and switched away from
  Broadcom wl to b43 on their LP PHY devices. So far, no complaints from
  them.
 
  Please reboot so that we see the ssb output as well. Use the command
 
  dmesg | egrep ssb|b43
 
  That way we will be able to see exactly what kind of device you have
  and what revisions are in it. AFAIK, the testing to date has been
  limited to Rev 1 PHYs and Rev 2 radios.
 
  Larry
 
 
  I can confirm the same issue.  I have a HP Mini 1116NR with a Broadcom 4312.
   Looks to be a PHY 1, Radio 2:
 
  --snip--
  [  456.165296] b43-phy0 debug: Found PHY: Analog 6, Type 5, Revision 1
  [  456.165364] b43-phy0 debug: Found Radio: Manuf 0x17F, Version 0x2062,
  Revision 2
  --snip--
 
  I've attached the output of 'dmesg | egrep ssb|b43', my kernel config, and
  lspci -vv and lspci -nn
 
  Note: With the dmesg output, I had unloaded the b43 module previous
  'modprobe -r b43' and then loaded it again with debug output: 'modprobe b43
  verbose=3'
 
  John Daiker
 
 
 Again, please test with v478 or v5xx firmware.
 

This won't help. The DMA engine reports a descriptor error. That means the 
device
was unable to fetch the control data via DMA. Most of the time this indicates
a bug/failure/quirk in the platform DMA implementation.

-- 
Greetings, Michael.
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-08 Thread Larry Finger
John Daiker wrote:
 On 09/08/2009 07:54 AM, Larry Finger wrote:
 Michael Buesch wrote:
 On Tuesday 08 September 2009 15:47:32 Dave Young wrote:
 I tested wireless-testing b43 driver, but got Fatal DMA error
 then the controller keep restarting...

 Please tell what I can provide or test, Thanks.

 Is this a regression? If so, please bisect.

 It is something specific to his system as I don't see anything like
 this. In addition, there are some users on the openSUSE forums that
 have implemented the latest compat-wireless and switched away from
 Broadcom wl to b43 on their LP PHY devices. So far, no complaints from
 them.

 Please reboot so that we see the ssb output as well. Use the command

 dmesg | egrep ssb|b43

 That way we will be able to see exactly what kind of device you have
 and what revisions are in it. AFAIK, the testing to date has been
 limited to Rev 1 PHYs and Rev 2 radios.

 Larry

 
 I can confirm the same issue.  I have a HP Mini 1116NR with a Broadcom
 4312.  Looks to be a PHY 1, Radio 2:
 
 --snip--
 [  456.165296] b43-phy0 debug: Found PHY: Analog 6, Type 5, Revision 1
 [  456.165364] b43-phy0 debug: Found Radio: Manuf 0x17F, Version 0x2062,
 Revision 2
 --snip--
 
 I've attached the output of 'dmesg | egrep ssb|b43', my kernel config,
 and lspci -vv and lspci -nn
 
 Note: With the dmesg output, I had unloaded the b43 module previous
 'modprobe -r b43' and then loaded it again with debug output: 'modprobe
 b43 verbose=3'

Your PHY and your radio are the same as mine. In fact, the one thing I
noticed is that you are using i386 architecture, whereas mine is
x86_64. I have not tested with i386.

Has anyone run the LP PHY modifications with 32-bit architecture?

Larry
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-08 Thread Gábor Stefanik
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Larry Fingerlarry.fin...@lwfinger.net wrote:
 John Daiker wrote:
 On 09/08/2009 07:54 AM, Larry Finger wrote:
 Michael Buesch wrote:
 On Tuesday 08 September 2009 15:47:32 Dave Young wrote:
 I tested wireless-testing b43 driver, but got Fatal DMA error
 then the controller keep restarting...

 Please tell what I can provide or test, Thanks.

 Is this a regression? If so, please bisect.

 It is something specific to his system as I don't see anything like
 this. In addition, there are some users on the openSUSE forums that
 have implemented the latest compat-wireless and switched away from
 Broadcom wl to b43 on their LP PHY devices. So far, no complaints from
 them.

 Please reboot so that we see the ssb output as well. Use the command

 dmesg | egrep ssb|b43

 That way we will be able to see exactly what kind of device you have
 and what revisions are in it. AFAIK, the testing to date has been
 limited to Rev 1 PHYs and Rev 2 radios.

 Larry


 I can confirm the same issue.  I have a HP Mini 1116NR with a Broadcom
 4312.  Looks to be a PHY 1, Radio 2:

 --snip--
 [  456.165296] b43-phy0 debug: Found PHY: Analog 6, Type 5, Revision 1
 [  456.165364] b43-phy0 debug: Found Radio: Manuf 0x17F, Version 0x2062,
 Revision 2
 --snip--

 I've attached the output of 'dmesg | egrep ssb|b43', my kernel config,
 and lspci -vv and lspci -nn

 Note: With the dmesg output, I had unloaded the b43 module previous
 'modprobe -r b43' and then loaded it again with debug output: 'modprobe
  b43 verbose=3'

 Your PHY and your radio are the same as mine. In fact, the one thing I
 noticed is that you are using i386 architecture, whereas mine is
 x86_64. I have not tested with i386.

 Has anyone run the LP PHY modifications with 32-bit architecture?

Yes, me. (With the exact same card as John.)


 Larry
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-wireless in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




-- 
Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-)
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-08 Thread Larry Finger
Michael Buesch wrote:
 
 This won't help. The DMA engine reports a descriptor error. That means the 
 device
 was unable to fetch the control data via DMA. Most of the time this indicates
 a bug/failure/quirk in the platform DMA implementation.

I can confirm that mine still works on x86_64 with firmware 410.

I have a spare partition that I will use to load an i386 version of
openSUSE 11.2 M6. That comes with a 2.6.31 kernel and it will be easy
to implement compat-wireless.

Larry



___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-08 Thread Larry Finger
Gábor Stefanik wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Larry Fingerlarry.fin...@lwfinger.net wrote:
 Your PHY and your radio are the same as mine. In fact, the one thing I
 noticed is that you are using i386 architecture, whereas mine is
 x86_64. I have not tested with i386.

 Has anyone run the LP PHY modifications with 32-bit architecture?
 
 Yes, me. (With the exact same card as John.)

Is it a maximum memory issue? How much for you?

John and Dave: Same question.

Larry
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-08 Thread Gábor Stefanik
2009/9/8 Larry Finger larry.fin...@lwfinger.net:
 Gábor Stefanik wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Larry Fingerlarry.fin...@lwfinger.net 
 wrote:
 Your PHY and your radio are the same as mine. In fact, the one thing I
 noticed is that you are using i386 architecture, whereas mine is
 x86_64. I have not tested with i386.

 Has anyone run the LP PHY modifications with 32-bit architecture?

 Yes, me. (With the exact same card as John.)

 Is it a maximum memory issue? How much for you?

 John and Dave: Same question.

 Larry


2GB here.

-- 
Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-)
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-08 Thread Larry Finger
2009/9/8 Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com

 2009/9/8 Larry Finger larry.fin...@lwfinger.net:
  Gábor Stefanik wrote:
  On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Larry Fingerlarry.fin...@lwfinger.net
 wrote:
  Your PHY and your radio are the same as mine. In fact, the one thing I
  noticed is that you are using i386 architecture, whereas mine is
  x86_64. I have not tested with i386.
 
  Has anyone run the LP PHY modifications with 32-bit architecture?
 
  Yes, me. (With the exact same card as John.)
 
  Is it a maximum memory issue? How much for you?
 
  John and Dave: Same question.
 
  Larry
 

 2GB here.


Having 1 or 2 GB shouldn't be a problem.  My trial will be with 3 - right on
the pae kernel boundary.

Larry
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev


Re: b43 dma error

2009-09-08 Thread Larry Finger
After some tests with the 32-bit architecture, I'm now thoroughly
confused. I tried different memory models including PAE - everything
worked. I even generated a 2.6.31-rc9-wl kernel with John's config and
it worked. Whatever is happening is not related to his configuration.
I'm not sure what the problem is.

I'm going to be offline for a few days - I hope the solution will be
in my mailbox by the weekend.

Larry

___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev