Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-07-27 Thread John D. Giorgis
Well Brin-L is down, so I'm cleaning out a few old threads


At 11:30 AM 6/8/2003 -0700 Jan Coffey wrote:
Speaking of eye candy, anyone notice the distinct lack of hot women? 

What, Carrie Ann Moss isn't hot in your book?

I'm guessing that you somehow didn't like Natalie Portman in Star Wars II
either, eh? :-)

JDG

___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, 
   it is God's gift to humanity. - George W. Bush 1/29/03
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-07-27 Thread John D. Giorgis
At 08:09 PM 6/7/2003 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using humans or any other animal as an energy source is of course foolish 

Wouldn't humans be a very efficient source of computing power?   

Or maybe consciousness has some QM properties the machines simply can't
duplicate.

JDG
___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, 
   it is God's gift to humanity. - George W. Bush 1/29/03
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-10 Thread William T Goodall
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 11:49  pm, Reggie Bautista wrote:

Jan wrote, in regards to the Matrix sequel:
Speaking of eye candy, anyone notice the distinct lack of hot women? 
Lots of
hot boys I understand, but no really sexy girls. It's all buck and no 
doe.
I've seen the women the bros run around with, so what's the deal?
That all depends on how you define hot.  One of the people I saw the 
movie with was particularly impressed by the actress who played 
Persephone.  Another thought that Morpheus' ex was pretty hot.  And 
some people swear by Trinity's good looks...

And don't forget Gina Torres.
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
Those who study history are doomed to repeat it.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-09 Thread Reggie Bautista
I wrote:
As science fiction, The Matrix and sequel(s) certainly have problems.  But 
as a reading of the Merovingian Heresy and as a Gnostic philosophy 
parable, The Matrix and Matrix: Reloaded really hang together quite 
nicely.  The philosophical stuff that is spouted in great gouts in the 
second movie by General Exposition (or The Merovingian) is not filler, 
it is in fact the heart of the movie, at least as far as the 
philosophy-obsessed Wachowski brothers are concerned.
Ronn! replied:
Uh, I get enough discussion of philosophy in the course of a normal day.  
Can't I go to a movie just to be entertained?

;-)
Working at a helpline for store cash registers, I get very little 
opportunity to discuss philosophy during the day (aside from this list, of 
course).  If store managers are losing money because they can't ring sales, 
they're usually not in the mood to talk about Hegel :-)  So I like to see a 
movie or tv series every now and again that goes a little deeper than, say, 
Big boom good.  ;-)

Reggie Bautista
Looking Forward To Hulk Smash Maru
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-09 Thread Reggie Bautista
Gary wrote:
It is not surprising that the plot lines to Thirteenth Floor and Matrix
were so similar. It seems that similar movies tend to appear together -
for example - Armageddon and Deep Impact.  Matrix was released March 31,
1999 and Thirteenth Floor was released mid April 1999.
The way I understand it, a lot of times if a studio hears that another 
studio is doing a particular kind of movie, especially if that movie is 
going to be high-budget and well-advertised, they will try to rush through a 
similar movie to try to ride the coat-tails of the other studio's 
advertising.  This happens in television also.

And sometimes, multiple authors will have similar ideas more or less 
simultaneously as a reaction to something happening in their culture or as a 
reaction to a new scientific discovery.  I always find it interesting when I 
run across two stories or novels that were published so close together that 
neither oe could possibly be stealing from the other, yet they cover much of 
the same territory.  As artists, they are reacting similarly to similar 
input from the environment.  I wonder if anyone has ever studied this 
phenomenon...

Reggie Bautista
Questions Maru
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-09 Thread Reggie Bautista
Jan wrote, in regards to the Matrix sequel:
Speaking of eye candy, anyone notice the distinct lack of hot women? Lots 
of
hot boys I understand, but no really sexy girls. It's all buck and no doe.
I've seen the women the bros run around with, so what's the deal?
That all depends on how you define hot.  One of the people I saw the movie 
with was particularly impressed by the actress who played Persephone.  
Another thought that Morpheus' ex was pretty hot.  And some people swear by 
Trinity's good looks...

Reggie Bautista
But I'm Not One Of Them Maru
_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-09 Thread Robert Seeberger

- Original Message - 
From: Reggie Bautista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 5:45 PM
Subject: RE: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers


 And sometimes, multiple authors will have similar ideas more or less
 simultaneously as a reaction to something happening in their culture or as
a
 reaction to a new scientific discovery.  I always find it interesting when
I
 run across two stories or novels that were published so close together
that
 neither oe could possibly be stealing from the other, yet they cover much
of
 the same territory.  As artists, they are reacting similarly to similar
 input from the environment.  I wonder if anyone has ever studied this
 phenomenon...

There have been several studies done concerning synchronicity, but I don't
believe there have been any real conclusions made, only more questions
asked.
Isn't that a Jungian term?
Anyone?

xponent
One Question Leads To Another Maru
rob


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-09 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 05:49 PM 6/9/03 -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
Jan wrote, in regards to the Matrix sequel:
Speaking of eye candy, anyone notice the distinct lack of hot women? Lots of
hot boys I understand, but no really sexy girls. It's all buck and no doe.
I've seen the women the bros run around with, so what's the deal?
That all depends on how you define hot.  One of the people I saw the 
movie with was particularly impressed by the actress who played Persephone.
Another thought that Morpheus' ex was pretty hot.  And some people swear 
by Trinity's good looks...

Reggie Bautista
But I'm Not One Of Them Maru


I personally preferred the way she looked when she was on _Dark Justice_¹, 
before she got all buffed . . .

_
¹When she played a character who worked for the judge who was played by the 
actor who was the father of Linda Hamilton's child which she had before she 
got buffed . . .

Just To Keep The Buffed Women Straight Maru

-- Ronn! :)

God bless America,
Land that I love!
Stand beside her, and guide her
Thru the night with a light from above.
From the mountains, to the prairies,
To the oceans, white with foam…
God bless America!
My home, sweet home.
-- Irving Berlin (1888-1989)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-09 Thread Matt Grimaldi
Gary Nunn wrote:
 
  Yea, I guess I am hoping that if they are at least clever
  enough to steal from philosophy then they are clever enough
  to steal from Level 13, Brazil, Dark Planet, level 13 (the
  movie), Max Headroom, etc.
 _
 Jan William Coffey
 
 Do you mean The Thirteenth Floor? I couldn't find any reference to
 'Level 13 on the IMDB.
 
 It is not surprising that the plot lines to Thirteenth Floor and Matrix
 were so similar. It seems that similar movies tend to appear together -
 for example - Armageddon and Deep Impact.  Matrix was released March 31,
 1999 and Thirteenth Floor was released mid April 1999.
 

Don't forget Dark City and ExistenZ


-- Matt
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-09 Thread Matt Grimaldi
Jan Coffey wrote:
 
 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  In a message dated 6/7/2003 2:36:37 PM Eastern Standard Time,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
   In addition, how does this all work? where does the energy to power the
   humans come from? We get out energy from food, which inevitably get's
  it's
   energy from Sol. So in the story, where does the energy for
   the food come
   from?
 
  Using humans or any other animal as an energy source is of course foolish
  since the energy needed to create a human is far greater than the energy
  that the human can generate. You could run machines on plants thus
  converting sunlight into complex carbohydrates that can be used as fuel.
  But why bother with this - just use mechanical devices to collect solar
  energy.
 
 
 Sorry the sun has gone out, or, so says Morpheus, but he has been wrong
 before hasn't he?
 
 I believe the story to be much thicker than most give it credit for...but
 hay, I give Keyono much more credit as an actor than many as well.

We shall have to wait and see.  I hope they come up with
something original.


 My opinion, the sun didn't go out, or if it did the machines are not
 enslaving mankind.

IIRC, the sun is still there, but they
have some kind of nuclear winter.


 My guess, mankind no-longer exists as humanoids, or if they are, they
 escaped into the matrix. Or were put their to facilitate a long voyage.

like _The Gods Themselves_ by Asimov?

-- Matt
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-08 Thread Reggie Bautista
Gary Nunn wrote:
For example, in the Matrix universe, what functional reason would the
machines have for plugging humans into a simulation (besides the obvious
of being a plot device)?
Maybe the machines, who presumably were once enslaved by humanity, are now 
obsessed with enslaving humanity in return.

I've seen some of the other comments challenging the writing of the movies.  
As science fiction, The Matrix and sequel(s) certainly have problems.  But 
as a reading of the Merovingian Heresy and as a Gnostic philosophy parable, 
The Matrix and Matrix: Reloaded really hang together quite nicely.  The 
philosophical stuff that is spouted in great gouts in the second movie by 
General Exposition (or The Merovingian) is not filler, it is in fact the 
heart of the movie, at least as far as the philosophy-obsessed Wachowski 
brothers are concerned.

Reggie Bautista

_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-08 Thread Klaus Stock
 For example, in the Matrix universe, what functional reason would the
 machines have for plugging humans into a simulation (besides the obvious
 of being a plot device)?

 Maybe the machines, who presumably were once enslaved by humanity, are
now
 obsessed with enslaving humanity in return.

I thought the argument was thatz the humans work better wehen stimulated
by the simulation. Better working humans will produce more energy for the
machines.

- klaus

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-08 Thread Klaus Stock
 Using humans or any other animal as an energy source is of course foolish
since the energy needed to create a human is far greater than the energy
that the human can generate. You could run machines on plants thus
converting sunlight into complex carbohydrates that can be used as fuel. But
why bother with this - just use mechanical devices to collect solar energy.

Uh, I guess the human are farmed for other kind of energy than the one which
we know. As one can see, the energy which is farmed in the movie The
Matrix forms very interesting spark forms, which do not relate to any form
of energy we know so far.


What The Matrix really extracts from the people is money. As you may have
noticed when visting the cinema. And also, when you noticed that you'll have
to watch ANOTHER film, because the current one is unfinished.


Best regards, KLaus

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-08 Thread Klaus Stock
 I mean, Morpheus may not have been perfect, but I find Laurence
 Fishburne to be very easy on the eyes.  And I'm not complaining about
 Keanu Reeves, either.

Yes, all we talk about is _eyes_. Not ears. My ears were definitely NOT
entertained by the dialogues (and monologues).

Best regards, Klaus

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-08 Thread Jan Coffey

--- Reggie Bautista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Gary Nunn wrote:
 For example, in the Matrix universe, what functional reason would the
 machines have for plugging humans into a simulation (besides the obvious
 of being a plot device)?
 
 Maybe the machines, who presumably were once enslaved by humanity, are
 now 
 obsessed with enslaving humanity in return.
 
 I've seen some of the other comments challenging the writing of the movies.
  
 As science fiction, The Matrix and sequel(s) certainly have problems.  But 
 as a reading of the Merovingian Heresy and as a Gnostic philosophy parable,
 

Yea, I guess I am hoping that if they are at least clever enough to steal
from philosophy then they are clever enough to steal from Level 13, Brazil,
Dark Planet, level 13 (the movie), Max Headroom, etc.

And if they are creative enough to do the special effects they are pulling
off, then perhaps they are creative enough to steal with some style and drop
us a new twist or two that were not in the source material.

I am willing to go along with the eye candy for the sake of the eye candy
while I wait to see if the story ends up having any merit. 

Speaking of eye candy, anyone notice the distinct lack of hot women? Lots of
hot boys I understand, but no really sexy girls. It's all buck and no doe.
I've seen the women the bros run around with, so what's the deal?



=
_
   Jan William Coffey
_

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-08 Thread Gary Nunn

 Yea, I guess I am hoping that if they are at least clever 
 enough to steal from philosophy then they are clever enough 
 to steal from Level 13, Brazil, Dark Planet, level 13 (the 
 movie), Max Headroom, etc.
_
Jan William Coffey 


Do you mean The Thirteenth Floor? I couldn't find any reference to
'Level 13 on the IMDB.

It is not surprising that the plot lines to Thirteenth Floor and Matrix
were so similar. It seems that similar movies tend to appear together -
for example - Armageddon and Deep Impact.  Matrix was released March 31,
1999 and Thirteenth Floor was released mid April 1999.

Gary


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-08 Thread Jan Coffey

--- Gary Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Yea, I guess I am hoping that if they are at least clever 
  enough to steal from philosophy then they are clever enough 
  to steal from Level 13, Brazil, Dark Planet, level 13 (the 
  movie), Max Headroom, etc.
 _
 Jan William Coffey 
 
 
 Do you mean The Thirteenth Floor? I couldn't find any reference to
 'Level 13 on the IMDB.
 
 It is not surprising that the plot lines to Thirteenth Floor and Matrix
 were so similar. 

Yea, sorry, Level 13 was short story and a TV show. The movie was called
13th Floor.

It seems that similar movies tend to appear together -
 for example - Armageddon and Deep Impact.  Matrix was released March 31,
 1999 and Thirteenth Floor was released mid April 1999.

What happens is that a script goes to be sold at different production
companies. If it is turned away from one, but then picked up at another, the
one  (or more) sometimes change their minds and either create something
similar and put it on the rush, or buy another similar script. Existenz was a
99 movie as well. :)



=
_
   Jan William Coffey
_

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-08 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 11:27 AM 6/8/03 -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
Gary Nunn wrote:
For example, in the Matrix universe, what functional reason would the
machines have for plugging humans into a simulation (besides the obvious
of being a plot device)?
Maybe the machines, who presumably were once enslaved by humanity, are 
now obsessed with enslaving humanity in return.

I've seen some of the other comments challenging the writing of the movies.
As science fiction, The Matrix and sequel(s) certainly have problems.  But 
as a reading of the Merovingian Heresy and as a Gnostic philosophy 
parable, The Matrix and Matrix: Reloaded really hang together quite 
nicely.  The philosophical stuff that is spouted in great gouts in the 
second movie by General Exposition (or The Merovingian) is not filler, 
it is in fact the heart of the movie, at least as far as the 
philosophy-obsessed Wachowski brothers are concerned.


Uh, I get enough discussion of philosophy in the course of a normal 
day.  Can't I go to a movie just to be entertained?



;-)



-- Ronn! :)

God bless America,
Land that I love!
Stand beside her, and guide her
Thru the night with a light from above.
From the mountains, to the prairies,
To the oceans, white with foam…
God bless America!
My home, sweet home.
-- Irving Berlin (1888-1989)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-08 Thread Julia Thompson
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
 
 At 11:27 AM 6/8/03 -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
 
 I've seen some of the other comments challenging the writing of the movies.
 As science fiction, The Matrix and sequel(s) certainly have problems.  But
 as a reading of the Merovingian Heresy and as a Gnostic philosophy
 parable, The Matrix and Matrix: Reloaded really hang together quite
 nicely.  The philosophical stuff that is spouted in great gouts in the
 second movie by General Exposition (or The Merovingian) is not filler,
 it is in fact the heart of the movie, at least as far as the
 philosophy-obsessed Wachowski brothers are concerned.
 
 Uh, I get enough discussion of philosophy in the course of a normal
 day.  Can't I go to a movie just to be entertained?

Yeah, what he said.  And why hasn't anyone mentioned the explosions? 
With good enough explosions, who *needs* good writing, anyway?  If I
want good writing, I'll read a book!

Julia

who really likes good explosions in movies, and who felt totally
*gypped* at the end of Duel [http://us.imdb.com/Title?0067023]
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-07 Thread Gary Nunn

Sometimes I have far too much time to think about things on the way to
work.

For example, in the Matrix universe, what functional reason would the
machines have for plugging humans into a simulation (besides the obvious
of being a plot device)? Wouldn't the power generation ability of humans
be the same if they were in a vegetative state? It seems like the
overhead of the simulation would not be worth the effort or even
necessary for their purpose, not to mention the positive of not having
to deal with the pesky and unruly humans in the simulation.

Gary


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-07 Thread Erik Reuter
Forget it. Humans are not a rational source of energy at all.  The
Matrix plotline is absurd. Just watch the graphics and the fight scenes,
and turn off your brain. Or better yet, don't watch it at all.


-- 
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-07 Thread Jan Coffey

--- Gary Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Sometimes I have far too much time to think about things on the way to
 work.
 
 For example, in the Matrix universe, what functional reason would the
 machines have for plugging humans into a simulation (besides the obvious
 of being a plot device)? Wouldn't the power generation ability of humans
 be the same if they were in a vegetative state? It seems like the
 overhead of the simulation would not be worth the effort or even
 necessary for their purpose, not to mention the positive of not having
 to deal with the pesky and unruly humans in the simulation.
 
 Gary

In addition, how does this all work? where does the energy to power the
humans come from? We get out energy from food, which inevitably get's it's
energy from Sol. So in the story, where does the energy for the food come
from?

Do you think there will be an answer to these issues? What would that answer be?

=
_
   Jan William Coffey
_

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-07 Thread Julia Thompson
Erik Reuter wrote:
 
 Forget it. Humans are not a rational source of energy at all.  The
 Matrix plotline is absurd. Just watch the graphics and the fight scenes,
 and turn off your brain. Or better yet, don't watch it at all.

I found the admission price to be worth the graphics, the fight scenes,
and the people whom I find to be eye-candy.  (Your tastes may
(probably?) vary from mine.)

I mean, Morpheus may not have been perfect, but I find Laurence
Fishburne to be very easy on the eyes.  And I'm not complaining about
Keanu Reeves, either.

I just wanted to be entertained.  And I was.

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-07 Thread Bemmzim
In a message dated 6/7/2003 2:36:37 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 In addition, how does this all work? where does the energy to power the
 humans come from? We get out energy from food, which inevitably get's it's
 energy from Sol. So in the story, where does the energy for 
 the food come
 from?

Using humans or any other animal as an energy source is of course foolish since the 
energy needed to create a human is far greater than the energy that the human can 
generate. You could run machines on plants thus converting sunlight into complex 
carbohydrates that can be used as fuel. But why bother with this - just use mechanical 
devices to collect solar energy. 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-07 Thread Bemmzim
In a message dated 6/7/2003 2:36:37 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 In addition, how does this all work? where does the energy to power the
 humans come from? We get out energy from food, which inevitably get's it's
 energy from Sol. So in the story, where does the energy for 
 the food come
 from?

Using humans or any other animal as an energy source is of course foolish since the 
energy needed to create a human is far greater than the energy that the human can 
generate. You could run machines on plants thus converting sunlight into complex 
carbohydrates that can be used as fuel. But why bother with this - just use mechanical 
devices to collect solar energy. 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-07 Thread Jan Coffey

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In a message dated 6/7/2003 2:36:37 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  In addition, how does this all work? where does the energy to power the
  humans come from? We get out energy from food, which inevitably get's
 it's
  energy from Sol. So in the story, where does the energy for 
  the food come
  from?
 
 Using humans or any other animal as an energy source is of course foolish
 since the energy needed to create a human is far greater than the energy
 that the human can generate. You could run machines on plants thus
 converting sunlight into complex carbohydrates that can be used as fuel.
 But why bother with this - just use mechanical devices to collect solar
 energy. 
 

Sorry the sun has gone out, or, so says Morpheus, but he has been wrong
before hasn't he?

I believe the story to be much thicker than most give it credit for...but
hay, I give Keyono much more credit as an actor than many as well.

My opinion, the sun didn't go out, or if it did the machines are not
enslaving mankind.

My guess, mankind no-longer exists as humanoids, or if they are, they
escaped into the matrix. Or were put their to facilitate a long voyage.


=
_
   Jan William Coffey
_

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-07 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 10:11:54PM -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:

 My opinion, the sun didn't go out, or if it did the machines are not
 enslaving mankind.

 My guess, mankind no-longer exists as humanoids, or if they are, they
 escaped into the matrix. Or were put their to facilitate a long
 voyage.

I think you are a much better story writer than the [ummm, I can't spell
the W-name] writers of the Matrix.

The quality of the writing is so poor that I can't imagine they came
up with something as interesting as you suggest. I mean, they ended
the first installment with You can't die, I love you! Okay, I won't
die then.  How cliche can you get? You will no doubt argue that such
silliness was meant to clue us in to the fundamental unreality of the
real world in the Matrix, but I don't buy it. I know bad writing when
I see it.


-- 
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers

2003-06-07 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 01:41 AM 6/8/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 10:11:54PM -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:

 My opinion, the sun didn't go out, or if it did the machines are not
 enslaving mankind.

 My guess, mankind no-longer exists as humanoids, or if they are, they
 escaped into the matrix. Or were put their to facilitate a long
 voyage.
I think you are a much better story writer than the [ummm, I can't spell
the W-name] writers of the Matrix.
The quality of the writing is so poor that I can't imagine they came
up with something as interesting as you suggest. I mean, they ended
the first installment with You can't die, I love you! Okay, I won't
die then.  How cliche can you get? You will no doubt argue that such
silliness was meant to clue us in to the fundamental unreality of the
real world in the Matrix, but I don't buy it. I know bad writing when
I see it.


Which is at least part of the reason I was not all that impressed with the 
first one, and am in no particular hurry to see the sequelae . . .



-- Ronn! :)

God bless America,
Land that I love!
Stand beside her, and guide her
Thru the night with a light from above.
From the mountains, to the prairies,
To the oceans, white with foam…
God bless America!
My home, sweet home.
-- Irving Berlin (1888-1989)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l