Re: [ccp4bb] Sulphur SAD at home source

2018-04-03 Thread Joseph Ferrara
Jim Pflugrath and a couple of high school interns shot a short video on halide 
quick soaks a few years back. You can find it at 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45Qc3jOPaKY.

Cheers,

Joseph D. Ferrara, Ph.D.
CSO
Deputy Director, X-ray Research Laboratory
Vice President, American Crystallographic Association

Rigaku Corporation
9009 New Trails Drive
The Woodlands, TX 77381
Tel: 281-362-2300 x 168
Skype: xrayjoe
url: www.rigaku.com



From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Roger 
Rowlett
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 9:57 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Sulphur SAD at home source

Iodine is ideally suited for Cu K-alpha SAD phasing, and iodide ions can 
normally be easily added by soaking crystals in potassium iodide containing 
solutions, which can be done at the time of cryopreservation. A quick lit 
search will turn up the appropriate protocols. For structural genomics work 
where MR was unsuccessful or unusable, iodide soaks were found to work as much 
as 80% of the time.

I've used iodide-soaked lysozyme for an XRD teaching lab and undergraduate 
research student training, and SAD phasing works really well on an overnight 
data collection on our Oxford Diffraction PX-ultra system. It's worth a shot, 
and very easy to do. Many proteins will tolerate soaking, especially if 
crystallized from salts.
___
Roger S. Rowlett
Gordon & Dorothy Kline Professor Emeritus
Department of Chemistry
Colgate University
13 Oak Drive
Hamilton, NY 13346

tel: (315)-228-7245
ofc: (315)-228-7395
fax: (315)-228-7935
email: rrowl...@colgate.edu
On 4/3/2018 10:46 AM, Eleanor Dodson wrote:
Well - the S f" is only ~ 0.5 at Cu Kalpha so the signal will be very weak..
Very accurate data may get a solution but you first have to position the S 
atoms...
Much easier to try to make a heavy atom derivative!
Eleanor

On 3 April 2018 at 15:26, Manoj Saxena 
<1d16aa30e8a1-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
 wrote:
Hi All,

I am writing to seek advice on doing  sulphur SAD data collection
at Cu based home source for a protein that is 12 KDa and has 6 S atoms.
I have seen some links online and some references but would be grateful if
you can share your know-how for success with this.
Like what multiplicity of data would be good to aim for and
data processing tips.
Inputs from people who have tried and failed would also be highly appreciated.

Thank you
Manoj Saxena
University of Puerto Rico






Re: [ccp4bb] Sulphur SAD at home source

2018-04-03 Thread Andreas Förster
Dear Manoj,

I'm happy to answer your questions and have a look at your data.  Maybe we
can take this off-list and you report back if and when you solve your
structure.

By the way, I'm processing native data collected with a MetalJet at the
moment.  The anomalous signal is even weaker at 1.35 Å but can be useful.

All best.


Andreas



On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:36 PM, Manoj Saxena  wrote:

> Thank you!, Andreas and all others who replied.
>  I have seen your tutorial and that's what I was referring to.
> Maybe I can consult you later when I screen some samples and have an idea
> of signal strength?
>
> Regards
> Manoj
>
>
> 2018-04-03 10:55 GMT-04:00 Andreas Förster :
>
>> Dear Manoj,
>>
>> providing your crystals diffract to at least 2.5 Å and the sulfurs are
>> ordered, you should be able to solve your structure without too many
>> problems.  As a first experiment, I would recommend collecting 360 degrees
>> of data.  Process these with XDS and the FRIEDEL'S_LAW= FALSE option and
>> see how much anomalous signal CORRECT.LP reports, if you've got stars in
>> the values of the Anomal Corr column, you're on the right track.  Try to
>> phase with SHELXD, following the advice on http://shelx.uni-goettingen
>> .de/tutorials.php.
>>
>> If you don't succeed, you might need higher multiplicity.  If you have a
>> kappa or chi goniometer, you can reorient the crystal and collect another
>> 360 degrees and another 360 degrees, and so on.  Merge all data in XSCALE
>> until you can solve the structure.
>>
>> I once wrote a little tutorial for doing S-SAD on the home source that
>> you might want to follow.  http://www.imperial.ac.uk/x-ra
>> y-crystallography/learning-more/sulphur-sad/  With an HPC detector (or
>> even an image plate) you'd getter better data than with a CCD detector
>> and be able to solve your structure quicker.  (Disclaimer: I work for a
>> company that makes HPC detectors.)  I consider the home source a great
>> place to solve structures by native SAD.
>>
>> All best.
>>
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Manoj Saxena <
>> 1d16aa30e8a1-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I am writing to seek advice on doing  sulphur SAD data collection
>>> at Cu based home source for a protein that is 12 KDa and has 6 S atoms.
>>> I have seen some links online and some references but would be grateful
>>> if
>>> you can share your know-how for success with this.
>>> Like what multiplicity of data would be good to aim for and
>>> data processing tips.
>>> Inputs from people who have tried and failed would also be highly
>>> appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>> Manoj Saxena
>>> University of Puerto Rico
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 
>> Andreas Förster, Ph.D.
>> MX Application Scientist, Scientific Sales
>> Phone: +41 56 500 21 00 <+41%2056%20500%2021%2000> | Direct: +41 56 500
>> 21 76 <+41%2056%20500%2021%2076> | Email: andreas.foers...@dectris.com
>> DECTRIS Ltd. | Taefernweg 1
>> 
>>
>> |
>> 5405 Baden-Daettwil
>> 
>>
>> 
>> | Switz
>> 
>> erland
>> 
>>
>> 
>> |
>> 
>> www.dectris.com
>>
>> [image: LinkedIn] 
>>  [image: facebook]
>> 
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Confidentiality Note: This message is intended only for the use of the
>> named
>> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
>> you
>> are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the
>> message.
>> Any unauthorized use of the information contained in this message is
>> prohibited.
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 

Andreas Förster, Ph.D.
MX Application Scientist, Scientific Sales
Phone: +41 56 500 21 00 | Direct: +41 56 500 21 76 | Email:
andreas.foers...@dectris.com
DECTRIS Ltd. | Taefernweg 1 | 5405 Baden-Daettwil | Switzerland |
www.dectris.com

[image: LinkedIn] 
 [image: facebook]


Re: [ccp4bb] Sulphur SAD at home source

2018-04-03 Thread Raghurama P Hegde
Hi Manoj,

Like Eleanor has pointed out a very accurate data may get you a solution. If 
you have crystals that diffract well and give you data with high I/sigma(I) you 
can attempt to find the positions of the S atoms and use that to arrive at a 
structure. Using lysozyme as a test case we have shown that structure can be 
solved from a routine data set collected at 1 Å (with 10 S but a f” of ~0.28), 
with anomalous multiplicity ~12. Details are published in this paper (yes it’s 
a shameless plug for our paper! ):

Hegde et al. (2017), The hidden treasure in your data: phasing with unexpected 
weak anomalous scatterers from routine data sets, Acta Crystallogr F Struct 
Biol Commun, 73, 184-195.
http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S2053230X17002680.

However the data was not collected at a home source but at a synchrotron 
beamline. There could also be some weak anomalous scatterers acquired during 
crystallization, from the crystallization condition, so you could collect a 
data set to check for the presence of anomalous signal in it and attempt 
experimental phasing. That could give you pointers on a future course of action 
like going to a synchrotron beamline to collect stronger, more accurate data or 
prepare heavy atom derivates, like Eleanor has pointed out.

As for data processing you’d have to process the data with Friedel mates pairs 
kept separate so that the anomalous differences can be used to find positions 
of the S atoms.

Hope that helps,
Raghu

From: CCP4 bulletin board  On Behalf Of Eleanor Dodson
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 20:17
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Sulphur SAD at home source

Well - the S f" is only ~ 0.5 at Cu Kalpha so the signal will be very weak..
Very accurate data may get a solution but you first have to position the S 
atoms...
Much easier to try to make a heavy atom derivative!
Eleanor

On 3 April 2018 at 15:26, Manoj Saxena 
<1d16aa30e8a1-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
 wrote:
Hi All,

I am writing to seek advice on doing  sulphur SAD data collection
at Cu based home source for a protein that is 12 KDa and has 6 S atoms.
I have seen some links online and some references but would be grateful if
you can share your know-how for success with this.
Like what multiplicity of data would be good to aim for and
data processing tips.
Inputs from people who have tried and failed would also be highly appreciated.

Thank you
Manoj Saxena
University of Puerto Rico





Re: [ccp4bb] Sulphur SAD at home source

2018-04-03 Thread Roger Rowlett
Iodine is ideally suited for Cu K-alpha SAD phasing, and iodide ions can 
normally be easily added by soaking crystals in potassium iodide 
containing solutions, which can be done at the time of cryopreservation. 
A quick lit search will turn up the appropriate protocols. For 
structural genomics work where MR was unsuccessful or unusable, iodide 
soaks were found to work as much as 80% of the time.


I've used iodide-soaked lysozyme for an XRD teaching lab and 
undergraduate research student training, and SAD phasing works really 
well on an overnight data collection on our Oxford Diffraction PX-ultra 
system. It's worth a shot, and very easy to do. Many proteins will 
tolerate soaking, especially if crystallized from salts.

___
Roger S. Rowlett
Gordon & Dorothy Kline Professor Emeritus
Department of Chemistry
Colgate University
13 Oak Drive
Hamilton, NY 13346

tel: (315)-228-7245
ofc: (315)-228-7395
fax: (315)-228-7935
email: rrowl...@colgate.edu

On 4/3/2018 10:46 AM, Eleanor Dodson wrote:
Well - the S f" is only ~ 0.5 at Cu Kalpha so the signal will be very 
weak..
Very accurate data may get a solution but you first have to position 
the S atoms...


Much easier to try to make a heavy atom derivative!

Eleanor

On 3 April 2018 at 15:26, Manoj Saxena 
<1d16aa30e8a1-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk 
> wrote:


Hi All,

I am writing to seek advice on doing  sulphur SAD data collection
at Cu based home source for a protein that is 12 KDa and has 6 S
atoms.
I have seen some links online and some references but would be
grateful if
you can share your know-how for success with this.
Like what multiplicity of data would be good to aim for and
data processing tips.
Inputs from people who have tried and failed would also be highly
appreciated.

Thank you
Manoj Saxena
University of Puerto Rico







Re: [ccp4bb] Sulphur SAD at home source

2018-04-03 Thread Andreas Förster
Dear Manoj,

providing your crystals diffract to at least 2.5 Å and the sulfurs are
ordered, you should be able to solve your structure without too many
problems.  As a first experiment, I would recommend collecting 360 degrees
of data.  Process these with XDS and the FRIEDEL'S_LAW= FALSE option and
see how much anomalous signal CORRECT.LP reports, if you've got stars in
the values of the Anomal Corr column, you're on the right track.  Try to
phase with SHELXD, following the advice on http://shelx.uni-goettingen
.de/tutorials.php.

If you don't succeed, you might need higher multiplicity.  If you have a
kappa or chi goniometer, you can reorient the crystal and collect another
360 degrees and another 360 degrees, and so on.  Merge all data in XSCALE
until you can solve the structure.

I once wrote a little tutorial for doing S-SAD on the home source that you
might want to follow.  http://www.imperial.ac.uk/x-
ray-crystallography/learning-more/sulphur-sad/  With an HPC detector (or
even an image plate) you'd getter better data than with a CCD detector and
be able to solve your structure quicker.  (Disclaimer: I work for a company
that makes HPC detectors.)  I consider the home source a great place to
solve structures by native SAD.

All best.


Andreas



On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Manoj Saxena <1d16aa30e8a1-dmarc-reques
t...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I am writing to seek advice on doing  sulphur SAD data collection
> at Cu based home source for a protein that is 12 KDa and has 6 S atoms.
> I have seen some links online and some references but would be grateful if
> you can share your know-how for success with this.
> Like what multiplicity of data would be good to aim for and
> data processing tips.
> Inputs from people who have tried and failed would also be highly
> appreciated.
>
> Thank you
> Manoj Saxena
> University of Puerto Rico
>
>
>


-- 

Andreas Förster, Ph.D.
MX Application Scientist, Scientific Sales
Phone: +41 56 500 21 00 <+41%2056%20500%2021%2000> | Direct: +41 56 500 21
76 <+41%2056%20500%2021%2076> | Email: andreas.foers...@dectris.com
DECTRIS Ltd. | Taefernweg 1 | 5405 Baden-Daettwil | Switzerland |
www.dectris.com

[image: LinkedIn] 
 [image: facebook]







Confidentiality Note: This message is intended only for the use of the
named
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you
are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the
message.
Any unauthorized use of the information contained in this message is
prohibited.


Re: [ccp4bb] Sulphur SAD at home source

2018-04-03 Thread Eleanor Dodson
Well - the S f" is only ~ 0.5 at Cu Kalpha so the signal will be very
weak..
Very accurate data may get a solution but you first have to position the S
atoms...

Much easier to try to make a heavy atom derivative!

Eleanor

On 3 April 2018 at 15:26, Manoj Saxena <
1d16aa30e8a1-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I am writing to seek advice on doing  sulphur SAD data collection
> at Cu based home source for a protein that is 12 KDa and has 6 S atoms.
> I have seen some links online and some references but would be grateful if
> you can share your know-how for success with this.
> Like what multiplicity of data would be good to aim for and
> data processing tips.
> Inputs from people who have tried and failed would also be highly
> appreciated.
>
> Thank you
> Manoj Saxena
> University of Puerto Rico
>
>
>


[ccp4bb] Sulphur SAD at home source

2018-04-03 Thread Manoj Saxena
Hi All,

I am writing to seek advice on doing  sulphur SAD data collection
at Cu based home source for a protein that is 12 KDa and has 6 S atoms.
I have seen some links online and some references but would be grateful if
you can share your know-how for success with this.
Like what multiplicity of data would be good to aim for and
data processing tips.
Inputs from people who have tried and failed would also be highly
appreciated.

Thank you
Manoj Saxena
University of Puerto Rico


[ccp4bb] Postdoctoral researcher position in Structural Biology at Uppsala University

2018-04-03 Thread Julia Griese

Dear all,

I have an opening for a postdoctoral researcher in my group at the 
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.


The project aims to study the structure and function of metal-responsive 
transcription factors. The successful candidate should have an excellent 
track record and experience in X-ray crystallography as well as protein 
expression and purification. Experience of complementary techniques in 
biochemistry and biophysics would be a benefit.


For more information about the position and how to apply please see:

http://uu.se/en/about-uu/join-us/details/?positionId=199363

You are welcome to contact me for more information, but please note that 
you have to apply through the university system. Applications sent 
directly to me cannot be processed.


Best regards,

Julia

--
Dr. Julia Griese
Assistant Professor
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology
Uppsala University
BMC, Box 596
SE-75124 Uppsala
Sweden

email: julia.gri...@icm.uu.se
phone: +46-(0)18-471 4043


[ccp4bb] SGC Oxford Symposium: Exploiting Disease Genomics to Catalyse New Medicines; June 14th

2018-04-03 Thread Alex Bullock
[cid:image001.png@01D3C766.E1037C50]

We're pleased to announce that registration is now open for SGC Oxford's 
upcoming symposium "Exploiting Disease Genomics to Catalyse New Medicines" 
which will take place at St. Catherine's College, Oxford on 14th June 2018.

Full details and links for registration are below (£50 academic; £100 industry):
https://www.thesgc.org/tep-symposium-2018
The international programme includes talks from leading academics and industry 
members at ICR, LifeArc, Open Targets, SGC, Eli Lilly, The Brain Tumour Charity 
and the Universities of Oxford/Cambridge/Cardiff/Dundee/British Columbia and 
will showcase novel potential targets for translational research, including 
results from the SGC's Target Enabling Packages (TEPs) programme.  A poster 
session will also be held.

For any queries, please contact 
jonathan.l...@sgc.ox.ac.uk

Alex Bullock
SGC Oxford


Re: [ccp4bb] Anderson?Evans polyoxotungstate (TEW)

2018-04-03 Thread Frank von Delft
We bought some recently hoping for some magic for a specific project 
that we needed new crystal forms for.  Alas, no fairy dust magic in our 
hands.  Maybe we didn't do the protocol right - but of course, one 
doesn't expect to have to do that with fairy dust. We haven't tried with 
many things, though.


All these tricks published over the years seem to /on average/ but 
hardly ever when you need them.  Which is fine if you're funded to 
generate lots of structures, but frustrating if you're funded to crack 
specific science.


While I'm at it:  for those of you asked to review such methods in the 
future, could you insist on them being tested on a lot more than 
lysozyme and thaumatin?


phx


On 31/03/2018 01:44, Whitley, Matthew J. wrote:
I would also be interested in learning whether polyoxotungstate has 
worked wonders for anyone.  At the current price of 387 EUR/gram, it 
is a bit too expensive for us to seriously consider giving it a try.  
Yes, a gram is a lot of compound and would probably last a long time, 
but there are other things at present that we know would give us more 
bang for our buck euro.  If anyone has any great stories of how it was 
a game changer for them, that would do a lot to motivate us to give it 
a try.  Eager to hear about your experiences using the compound.


Thanks,
Matthew
---
Matthew J. Whitley, Ph.D.
Research Instructor
W. Furey Lab
Department of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
On 3/30/2018 7:00 PM, CCP4BB automatic digest system wrote:

--
Date:Fri, 30 Mar 2018 20:24:29 +0200
From:Nikolay Dobrev
Subject: Anderson?Evans polyoxotungstate (TEW)

Dear all,
I apologize for my off-topic question.
I want to ask if anyone has so far used the Anderson-Evans
polyoxotungstate
(https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jenabioscience.com%2Fcrystallography-cryo-em%2Fscreening%2Fxp-screen%2Fx-tew-anderson-evans-polyoxotungstate=01%7C01%7Cmjw100%40PITT.EDU%7C27d0177bd91c4d421ed508d59692ef9d%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1=IXVk9RvttYWokRiY2M9H43br5JHo2REjfx9HBML13rI%3D=0).
Did someone see an improvement in crystal quality/diffraction?
Any comments will be highly appreciated.

Nikolay Dobrev



Nikolay Dobrev
PhD Student in AG Sinning & AG Fischer
Biochemie Zentrum
Heidelberg University
Im Neuenheimer Feld 328
69120 Heidelberg
Germany
Phone: +49 6221 54 4796
Email: