Re: [CentOS-es] CentOS 5.2 ... Cuando ?
Hola: La espera de mi parte ha sido bastante dramatica ya que tengo la urgencia de poner en marcha un par de equipos con hardware nuevo, espero que realmente el dato sea correcto. Disculpa que haga una pregunta sobre tu respuesta, pero que problema pudiera haber si se instala la version actual de CentOS y luego, se hace un yum upgrade cuando se libere la 5.2? No seria igual o hay alguna diferencia que se me escapa? Tenia entendido que entre versiones (3, 4, 5) si era bueno hacer una instalacion nueva, pero entre actualizaciones (x.0, x.1, x.2) se podia hacer yum update/yum upgrade sin problema (los repositorios por defecto apuntan siempre a la version mas actualizada que haya). Saludos Osvaldo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] rpmfusion status?
Unless I've missed something (which is possible) there hasn't been any public progress announcements regarding rpmfusion in the past several weeks. Is there anything new to report? My ulterior motive is that I would love to have the convenience of a one-stop rpm shop for Centos/RHEL and Fedora, and it's my understanding that's what rpmfusion is intended to be... -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 00:52 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: Unless I've missed something (which is possible) there hasn't been any public progress announcements regarding rpmfusion in the past several weeks. Is there anything new to report? My ulterior motive is that I would love to have the convenience of a one-stop rpm shop for Centos/RHEL and Fedora, and it's my understanding that's what rpmfusion is intended to be... RPMFusion has their own mailing lists; consider asking there. (Spoiler: Too much work, not enough people) -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams [EMAIL PROTECTED] PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Snort and CentOS 5.x
Can someone direct me to some simple instructions or a repo that I can enable to get snort installed on my CentOS 5.1 boxes? --Thanks, Jake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:40:08 -0400 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RPMFusion has their own mailing lists; consider asking there. I did exactly that, before posting my question here. Didn't see anything that looked like a recent overall progress update. The last post to the users list was almost a month back and the developers list is mostly concerned with individual packages and and not an overview. Dribble is apparently fully present and accounted for, but what of the other repositories? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] mod perl query
Dear All, I have recently installed centos 5 and working fine now i have a query with apache 1) does apache gets installed with mod perl with the defult install of centos 5 cause when i start up apache there is no mention of mod perl also httpd -l | egrep mod_perl prints nothing if mod perl is not install with installation of Centos how could i install apache with mod perl support apprecite your help regards fabian -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mod perl query
fabian dacunha wrote: Dear All, I have recently installed centos 5 and working fine now i have a query with apache 1) does apache gets installed with mod perl with the defult install of centos 5 cause when i start up apache there is no mention of mod perl also httpd -l | egrep mod_perl prints nothing if mod perl is not install with installation of Centos how could i install apache with mod perl support apprecite your help regards fabian just yum install mod_perl should do the job. yum search mod_perl mod_perl.i3862.0.2-6.3.el5 base Matched from: mod_perl Mod_perl incorporates a Perl interpreter into the Apache web server, so that the Apache web server can directly execute Perl code. Mod_perl links the Perl runtime library into the Apache web server and provides an object-oriented Perl interface for Apache's C language API. The end result is a quicker CGI script turnaround process, since no external Perl interpreter has to be started. Install mod_perl if you're installing the Apache web server and you'd like for it to directly incorporate a Perl interpreter. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ClamAV help needed
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 12:16, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Simon Banton wrote: Every day I see in logwatch that my signatures are updated, and the database notified, but if I try to scan a file manually it tells me that my signatures are 55 days old. I think clamscan looks for the db files in a compiled-in default location of /usr/local/share/clamav and doesn't consult the clamd.conf or freshclam.conf files (after all, why would it?) It does at least open freshclam.conf (which means that that one must be *readable* by the user running clamscan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$strace -eopen clamscan open(/etc/ld.so.cache, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/usr/lib/libclamav.so.4, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/lib/tls/libpthread.so.0, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/lib/tls/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY)= 3 open(/usr/lib/libz.so.1, O_RDONLY)= 3 open(/usr/lib/libbz2.so.1, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/usr/lib/sse2/libgmp.so.3, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so.4, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/usr/lib/libclamunrar.so.4, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/etc/freshclam.conf, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/var/clamav/daily.cld, O_RDONLY) = 3 freshclam.conf was root:root, so I've fixed that. Running your strace command gives me strace -eopen clamscan open(/etc/ld.so.cache, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/usr/lib/libclamav.so.4, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/lib/libpthread.so.0, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/lib/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY)= 3 open(/usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so.4, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/usr/lib/libbz2.so.1, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/usr/lib/sse2/libgmp.so.3, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/usr/lib/libz.so.1, O_RDONLY)= 3 open(/usr/lib/libclamunrar.so.4, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/etc/freshclam.conf, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/var/clamav/daily.cld, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/var/clamav, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 3 open(/var/clamav/main.cvd, O_RDONLY) = 4 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5/COPYING, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT| O_TRUNC, 0666) = 6 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5/main.info, O_WRONLY| O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666) = 6 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5/main.db, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT| O_TRUNC, 0666) = 6 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5/main.hdb, O_WRONLY| O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666) = 6 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5/main.mdb, O_WRONLY| O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666) = 6 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5/main.ndb, O_WRONLY| O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666) = 6 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5/main.zmd, O_WRONLY| O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666) = 6 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5/main.fp, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT| O_TRUNC, 0666) = 6 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK| O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 5 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5/main.zmd, O_RDONLY) = 6 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5/main.mdb, O_RDONLY) = 6 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5/main.db, O_RDONLY) = 6 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5/main.ndb, O_RDONLY) = 6 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5/main.fp, O_RDONLY) = 6 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5/main.hdb, O_RDONLY) = 6 open(/tmp/clamav-7c516bc61aa49e497301e91e0930f6c5, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK| O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 5 open(/proc/meminfo, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/root, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 3 open(/root/.xauthXN80U8, O_RDONLY)= 4 /root/.xauthXN80U8: OK open(/root/.viminfo, O_RDONLY)= 4 /root/.viminfo: OK open(/root/.bash_profile, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/.bash_profile: OK open(/root/iptables.orig, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/iptables.orig: OK open(/root/iptables.txt~, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/iptables.txt~: OK open(/root/iptables.txt, O_RDONLY)= 4 /root/iptables.txt: OK open(/root/scan.txt, O_RDONLY)= 4 /root/scan.txt: OK open(/root/.DCOPserver_borg2.lydgate.net__0, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/.DCOPserver_borg2.lydgate.net__0: OK open(/root/.serverauth.3061, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/.serverauth.3061: OK open(/root/.seaudit, O_RDONLY)= 4 /root/.seaudit: OK open(/root/.bashrc, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/.bashrc: OK open(/root/.audacity, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/.audacity: OK open(/root/.rnd, O_RDONLY)= 4 /root/.rnd: OK open(/root/.xauthhEtrij, O_RDONLY)= 4 /root/.xauthhEtrij: OK open(/root/.cshrc, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/.cshrc: OK open(/root/.mcoprc, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/.mcoprc: OK open(/root/.fonts.conf, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/.fonts.conf: OK open(/root/.serverauth.3072, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/.serverauth.3072: OK open(/root/.tcshrc, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/.tcshrc: OK open(/root/install.log.syslog, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/install.log.syslog: OK open(/root/.xauthOUZGv0, O_RDONLY)= 4 /root/.xauthOUZGv0: OK open(/root/.Xauthority, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/.Xauthority: OK open(/root/install.log, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/install.log: OK open(/root/.bash_logout, O_RDONLY)= 4 /root/.bash_logout: OK open(/root/.serverauth.3046, O_RDONLY) = 4 /root/.serverauth.3046: OK
[CentOS] Re: apt on Centos 5.1
Am Dienstag, den 17.06.2008, 16:28 -0600 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen: On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Benjamin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 17 June 2008, Mike wrote: Just read on planet centos that you can easily install apt on Centos too using yum. Why would you want to do this? Some people like the apt interface more than the yum interface. Some people feel that it is faster or meets their needs better. The reasons are outlined in DAGs post. Personally, I would rather port yum to debian systems.. so I can understand the want. Especially interfaces on top of apt like aptitude need this as well. I personally prefer ncurses based interfaces over X-graphical ones when it comes to server management on remote sites. Henry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ClamAV help needed
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 15:43, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Simon Banton wrote: At 14:48 +0200 17/6/08, Ralph Angenendt wrote: It doesn't here: Is your copy installed from rpm/yum or compiled from source? Mine's the latter. rpmforge. I should have said - mine is rpmforge, too. Anne ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ClamAV help needed
Anne Wilson wrote: freshclam.conf was root:root, so I've fixed that. Running your strace command gives me strace -eopen clamscan open(/etc/freshclam.conf, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/var/clamav/daily.cld, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/var/clamav, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 3 open(/var/clamav/main.cvd, O_RDONLY) = 4 So it opened freshclam.conf and then proceeded to read the database which is kept fresh by freshclam. The message about signatures being ancient comes from ClamTK virus scanner. Maybe there's some connection there that needs fixing? I have no idea about ClamTK - so yes, that might be the problem. No idea where that looks :) Cheers, Ralph pgpkkSa7arWSd.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ClamAV help needed
On Wednesday 18 June 2008 12:36:20 Ralph Angenendt wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: freshclam.conf was root:root, so I've fixed that. Running your strace command gives me strace -eopen clamscan open(/etc/freshclam.conf, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/var/clamav/daily.cld, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/var/clamav, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 3 open(/var/clamav/main.cvd, O_RDONLY) = 4 So it opened freshclam.conf and then proceeded to read the database which is kept fresh by freshclam. The message about signatures being ancient comes from ClamTK virus scanner. Maybe there's some connection there that needs fixing? I have no idea about ClamTK - so yes, that might be the problem. No idea where that looks :) OK, thanks. I'll do some googling. As far as I can remember, it was installed along with the rest from rpmforge. I'm certain I didn't download it from any other than my installed repos. As far as you can tell, then, clamav is working correctly? That's a comfort. Thanks for your help. Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CN=Nasreddine Kroun/OU=Benefits/O=Vitech is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 06/18/2008 and will not return until 06/19/2008. Probably I will be back to the office by this afternoon, but I'm not sure. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] apt on Centos 5.1
Mike wrote: Just read on planet centos that you can easily install apt on Centos too using yum. However, I get : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum install apt Loading installonlyn plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Nothing to do So not sure what I am missing .. And sorry if this isn't the right place to ask :) Linux and CentOS are about choice. Dag is a CentOS Developer and he does like apt. I'm sure Dag (and others) can help with apt questions here. That said there are alot of features in yum (like fastestmirror, priorities, installonlyn, and repoquery) that are not available in apt. There are also probably features in apt that are not in yum. Apt may easy to install and user friendly ... heck, it may even be better than yum, however it is not officially supported. The officially supported way to do updates on CentOS is yum ... and yumex is in the CentOS Extras repo as a GUI based system for updates. You can certainly ask about apt on CentOS here, though most of the CentOS developers use yum and the QA testing we do is with yum and not apt. This is not meant to be negative about apt use, just point out that yum is the official way to do updates. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mod perl query
fabian dacunha wrote: fabian dacunha wrote: Dear All, I have recently installed centos 5 and working fine now i have a query with apache 1) does apache gets installed with mod perl with the defult install of centos 5 cause when i start up apache there is no mention of mod perl also httpd -l | egrep mod_perl prints nothing if mod perl is not install with installation of Centos how could i install apache with mod perl support apprecite your help regards fabian just yum install mod_perl should do the job. yum search mod_perl mod_perl.i3862.0.2-6.3.el5 base Matched from: mod_perl Mod_perl incorporates a Perl interpreter into the Apache web server, so that the Apache web server can directly execute Perl code. Mod_perl links the Perl runtime library into the Apache web server and provides an object-oriented Perl interface for Apache's C language API. The end result is a quicker CGI script turnaround process, since no external Perl interpreter has to be started. Install mod_perl if you're installing the Apache web server and you'd like for it to directly incorporate a Perl interpreter. Thanks a lot for the imedite reply apprecite by the way when i say yum list mod_perl it says Installed Packages mod_perl.i3862.0.2-6.3.el5 installed so mod_perl is installed but how do i know if apache is running with mod_perl actually i need it since i wanna setup backuppc software apprecite your help if it is installed, then there should be a file called /etc/httpd/conf.d/perl.conf. That will make mod_perl available when apache is restarted after install of mod_perl signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] control outgoing IP address?
Barry Brimer wrote: I'd like to consolidate some services that have been assigned by IP (dns, syslog etc.) onto one machine by giving it IP aliases to accept connections for the old addresses until all the references are fixed. However, I'd like to have it use it's original IP as the source for outbound connections. Where do you control that? There may be settings in each application that control that, but in case there are not .. you should be able to do something like : iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p tcp --sport 334 -j SNAT --to 2.3.4.5 Is there no way to control the default source address? -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 5 on POWER
Any news on this? Will we see a POWER version of CentOS 5? -- //Morten Torstensen //Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] //IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] And if it turns out that there is a God, I don't believe that he is evil. The worst that can be said is that he's an underachiever. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] control outgoing IP address?
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Les Mikesell wrote: Barry Brimer wrote: I'd like to consolidate some services that have been assigned by IP (dns, syslog etc.) onto one machine by giving it IP aliases to accept connections for the old addresses until all the references are fixed. However, I'd like to have it use it's original IP as the source for outbound connections. Where do you control that? There may be settings in each application that control that, but in case there are not .. you should be able to do something like : iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p tcp --sport 334 -j SNAT --to 2.3.4.5 Is there no way to control the default source address? In some applications you can .. but it is application dependent. what applications are you looking to do this with? Barry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Xen
Luke S Crawford wrote: Well I have up to 4GB of run windows and I can have the other 4GB for dom0, so if I can get OpenVZ or linux vserver running on there, I can use that to run my linux VM's. But xenexpress limits you to 4Gb of physical ram total see http://www.xensource.com/Documents/XenServer41ProductOverview.pdf so if you have 4Gb in the DomU, you can't use another 4Gb in the Dom0 ___ From what I understand, they limit you to 4GB for DomU, you still have another 4GB available for Dom0, that you can use to run other apps, including possibly QEMU, or some other virtualization products. Russ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] control outgoing IP address?
Don't take this as a definitive answer, but I have multi-aliased CentOS boxen. I find that outgoing connections always come from the main IP address, not the aliases. In particular these boxen are web servers hosting multiple sites, hence the multi-IP and connections to the database all appear to be from the main IP. Applications can be attached to individual IPs, but I think the default routing is to use the main IP of the interface. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: nss_ldap (was Re: [CentOS] Could this be an advantage of CentOS over the PNAELV distribution?_
Meenoo Shivdasani wrote: There is a bug with nss_ldap and bash32 ... I created a new RPM for the nss_ldap that is currently in our testing repo. Johnny, I was wondering if that RPM includes the security fixes detailed in https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0389.html Yes, it contains all the pathces for that issue and has a work around for the bash32 issue. Note: This file is in our testing repo and will not be released on the ISOs or in the Updates repo ... but will be in the release notes and can be used by users who would LIKE to try it. We also created a kernel for bz32 that is in testing repo as well (that is fixed in 5.2). CentOS routinely creates patched RPMs like these to make available to our users (and upstream users / testers if they want). We also actively submit and track bugs and patches (if we have a fix) to the upstream bugzilla all the time. However, we do NOT roll these fixes in until they come down from upstream ... as we aim for binary compatibility, even for bugs. That is the only way to ensure things work the same. We also want to make the entire EL codebase better, not fork our EL codebase away from upsream like Oracle does with unbreakable linux. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CN=Nasreddine Kroun/OU=Benefits/O=Vitech is out of the office.
Nasreddine Kroun wrote: I will be out of the office starting 06/18/2008 and will not return until 06/19/2008. Probably I will be back to the office by this afternoon, but I'm not sure. Stop sending these notices to the list. We dont really care -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 on POWER
Morten Torstensen wrote: Any news on this? Will we see a POWER version of CentOS 5? we're getting the 32 and x86_64 versions of centos-5.2 done now, as soon as they are released we will goto work on the powerpc and ia64 varients -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
Frank Cox wrote: Unless I've missed something (which is possible) there hasn't been any public progress announcements regarding rpmfusion in the past several weeks. Is there anything new to report? My ulterior motive is that I would love to have the convenience of a one-stop rpm shop for Centos/RHEL and Fedora, and it's my understanding that's what rpmfusion is intended to be... rpmfusion never intended to support CentOS or any EL distro, they are very much Fedora centric, so you should go talk to them about it -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GParted
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:35:13 +0900 Ross Cavanagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for the rpm for gparted. It's in the rpmforge repository http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge I have found something quite old: gparted-0.3.3-2.el5.rf.i386.rpm, the current version is 0.3.7 Dag usually updates things, so I would verify that the versions of prerequisites for the newer version still works with EL5. One thing that people need to remember is that many of the linux projects are tied to the 6 month distro model and their newer products require GNOME 2.too_new_for_CentOS.x or gtk-2.too_new_for_CentOS-x (also same potential issue for QT and KDE). So, that newer version may or may not work. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: Re: [CentOS] using windows ad accounts for centos 5
Strange, when I run
sudo yum whatprovides pam_krb5.so
I get
pam_krb5.i3862.2.14-1
centos5-base-rep
Matched from:
/lib/security/pam_krb5.so
pam_krb5.so
If the yum command is failing to report this package, then check your
yum.repos.d files and make sure they aren't dorked.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Isaac Gonzalez
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 20:47
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: RE: Re: [CentOS] using windows ad accounts for centos 5
Hmmm... I get
authconfig: Authentication module /lib/security/pam_krb5.so is missing.
Authentication process will not work correctly.
When running this command...i tried to use yum whatprovides pam_krb5.so
...to no avail.
Any suggestions
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jay Leafey
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:35 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] using windows ad accounts for centos 5
Isaac Gonzalez wrote:
Hi I read and used the article
http://blog.wazollc.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=2 to authenticate my
ad accounts when logging on to cent 5…however, once I edit the
nsswitch.conf file, I can’t even log on as root or any local users
anymore. Kinit seems to initialize fine doing a kinit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , however doing a
getent passwd adusername ….it just sits there in the shell and does
nothing. I actually had to put all files back to where they were
before the change to even be able to login locally or use sudo.
I followed the steps line by line on this article but get stuck
everytime….anyone has an idea or a better documented way of achieving
what I am trying to do , please let me know.
Thanks,
Isaac
I'm using AD-via-Kerberos to authenticate users on several CentOS 5.1
systems. Setting it up was as easy as a single command line:
authconfig \
--usemd5 --useshadow --enablelocauthorize \
--enablekrb5 \
--krb5realm={AD Domain Name} \
--enablekrb5kdcdns --enablekrb5realmdns --update
This makes the necessary changes to /etc/krb5.conf, /etc/ and
/etc/nsswitch.conf. I am NOT using this for user information, just
password authentication, so I add user accounts for each authorized
user.
You can also consider using the --disablesysnetauth flag, which disables
authenticating system accounts via the network services and forces
them to use local authorization. This should prevent entries in the AD
for root and other system accounts from being used.
Hope that helps!
--
Jay Leafey - Memphis, TN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?
Nicholas wrote: Herrold, I meant RH, in terms of the RHEL distro. I look forward to have centos gain the LSB, what is needed for the pass thru? is the main CentOS community interested? As for the rest, thank you for the sharing of info. The LSB should be concern to encourage developers to built stuff that can be used across distros. LSB should reduce problems of desktop users who have been finding difficulty in getting stuff like printer drivers and other paraphernalia. The more distros adopting LSB then more developers/manufacturers will be encouraged on the use of LSB. Well .. I have run the latest testing scripts and CentOS-5.1 passes the 3.1 LSB for Core and Desktop. It does not pass the 3.2 LSB tests yet (neither does RHEL-5). I will work with Russ to see if I can get CentOS certified without paying $20,000.00 a year to make it happen. If we have to pay for this, well we can't be certified. Note, only one version of Ubuntu (6.0.6 LTS) and no Debian or Fedora versions are certified. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
Frank Cox wrote: Unless I've missed something (which is possible) there hasn't been any public progress announcements regarding rpmfusion in the past several weeks. Is there anything new to report? My ulterior motive is that I would love to have the convenience of a one-stop rpm shop for Centos/RHEL and Fedora, and it's my understanding that's what rpmfusion is intended to be... Not to start a repo flame war, but for CentOS/RHEL, the repo that aims to be a one-stop rpm shop is EPEL. Of course it needs more contributors, but it has already ported a significant amount of FC6's old 'extras' repo over (FC6 - EL5). I suspect that EL6 will be equivalent to F8 as F9 has just way too many new technologies that will take 2 years or more to settle down to stable technologies. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Not to start a repo flame war, but for CentOS/RHEL, the repo that aims to be a one-stop rpm shop is EPEL. Of course it needs more contributors, but it has already ported a significant amount of FC6's old 'extras' repo over (FC6 - EL5). Ross, you are wrong on that front - EPEL cant by definition be the one stop shop as a repo. Thats the sort of thing that some of us are trying to address with rpmforge, atrpms along with CentOS and SciLinux developers contributing into the rpmrepo.org project. Once its off the ground and functioning perhaps EPEL will like to join in, but thats their decision. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Commercial Support for CentOS 5 or above
On 6/16/08, Daniel Chen (yongnche) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I saw there's one Commercial Support in Support menu on CentOS main page, but it's blank. Actually I'm looking for the commercial support for CentOS, is there anyone or organization which is doing this? Thank you very much. Daniel: I see this, on the home page of the CentOS web site: Commercial support is offered via a number of vendors. and when I click on the link, as you wrote, there's nothing there If you need to pay someone to help you with a Server, occasionally, and you cannot find someone here on this mailing list, I suggest that you look in the Forums on http://www.webhostingtalk.com/ probably in the Dedicated Server Forum or in the Technical Security Issues Forum, you will see references to people who are recommended (or not recommended). You may be in the position where you do not need a Managed Server (costly and may not include the services you need), and where occasional help, to Secure the server or install configure something is what you need. Probably you would be in the same position, with RHEL that you are with CentOS. This mailing list is excellent, but, you may need someone with the expertise to SSH into your Server and do the job for you. If you do not need the resources of a Dedicated Server, or a VDS; Shared Hosting or a Semi Dedicated (Managed) account may be what you need. Keeping a server that is online updated and secure can be a PITA and if it is attacked and taken over by someone else, you will have a much bigger problem. One of my web sites, on Shared Hosting, was attacked, about 7 years ago, and it's nice to have people who do this all day, every day, take care of the problems for you. HTH, Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] RE: rpmfusion status?
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Not to start a repo flame war, nice try. -- Rex ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] custom kernel cant find label /
Hi all, I installed centos 4.6 on a USB thumbdrive. It installed and booted after install. I then put a custom kernel on, build it as I should, on rebooting and selecting my kernel to load from grub I it starts up and all and the last error I get is: label / not found. What went wrong? Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: custom kernel cant find label /
Jerry Geis wrote: Hi all, I installed centos 4.6 on a USB thumbdrive. It installed and booted after install. I then put a custom kernel on, build it as I should, on rebooting and selecting my kernel to load from grub I it starts up and all and the last error I get is: label / not found. What went wrong? Jerry CONFIG_NETLABEL=n CONFIG_BSD_DISKLABEL=n CONFIG_UNIXWARE_DISKLABEL=n Do I need any of the above to access the LABEL / at boot? Is it some other option? Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RE: rpmfusion status?
Rex Dieter wrote: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Not to start a repo flame war, nice try. Nice catch =:D scnr, Ralph pgp9vAWrQalU9.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
Karanbir Singh wrote: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Not to start a repo flame war, but for CentOS/RHEL, the repo that aims to be a one-stop rpm shop is EPEL. Of course it needs more contributors, but it has already ported a significant amount of FC6's old 'extras' repo over (FC6 - EL5). Ross, you are wrong on that front - EPEL cant by definition be the one stop shop as a repo. Thats the sort of thing that some of us are trying to address with rpmforge, atrpms along with CentOS and SciLinux developers contributing into the rpmrepo.org project. Once its off the ground and functioning perhaps EPEL will like to join in, but thats their decision. If they manage to port all the Fedora extras over for EL then I would say that is pretty darn close to one-stop shop for RPMs. Of course no repo can have it all. There are always the questionable items like closed source drivers and codecs which should be isolated. Now I am not even going to touch the political/moral issue of whether they SHOULD be a one-stop shop, I merely stated what they aim to be. CentOS could develop it's own EPEL-like repo for it's 'extras' if enough developers are willing to put in the time to develop and maintain such a beast. There could be one for each release and use the corresponding Fedora 'extras' repo as the base to build off of. Personally if my opinion matters for anything, which it most probably doesn't, I have always felt that enterprise Linux repos would be best served if they were maintained expressly for the enterprise Linux they serve. That way compatibility and quality assurance would be at the same level as the Linux they run on and they can react faster to changes within the enterprise Linux environment. The bottom line in this whole discussion though is we all hate repo overlap and I think if given the chance to pick one repo that had almost all we were looking for we would pick that one. I believe it is in that regard that Debian has it's strength. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] RE: rpmfusion status?
Ralph Angenendt wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Not to start a repo flame war, nice try. Nice catch =:D I had to preface it with that, so I wouldn't seem like a total troll! Now if you excuse me, since my work is done here, I have a bridge to crawl under... -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: If they manage to port all the Fedora extras over for EL then I would say that is pretty darn close to one-stop shop for RPMs. Of course no repo can have it all. There are always the questionable items like closed source drivers and codecs which should be isolated. Ross, you are obviously interested in the flames more than anything else, and as Rex already pointed out in a hintting kind of way, lots of us are no longer interested in that. You need to go back and workout what a real resourceful repo should / could / would have. If EPEL gives you all that, your' done. For a vast majority of the rest of us, it doesnt and the way their mandate works, it wont. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] apt on Centos 5.1
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : Apt may easy to install and user friendly ... heck, it may even be better than yum, however it is not officially supported. The officially supported way to do updates on CentOS is yum ... and yumex is in the CentOS Extras repo as a GUI based system for updates. There's also pirut, the built-in graphical updater (that I never use, but I'm a command line junkie from WAY back). mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Single crontab entry for every 15 minutes beginning ending on the hour
We have a cron job that needs to run every 15 minutes throughout business hours. The first run is at 8:00, the last run is at 17:00. Is it possible to specify this time range in a single line? */15 8-17 * * 1-5 will run 8:00 - 17:45. That's not what I want. Likewise */15 8-16 * * 1-5 will have the last run at 16:45, not 17:00 This is more of a brainteaser than a real problem. I can easily configure the job with multiple entries, but I'm a little obsessive-compulsive so I want to try to do it with one entry. # rpm -qa vixie-cron vixie-cron-4.1-49.EL4 -- Jeff ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] custom kernel cant find label /
Jerry Geis wrote: I installed centos 4.6 on a USB thumbdrive. It installed and booted after install. I then put a custom kernel on, build it as I should, on rebooting and selecting my kernel to load from grub I it starts up and all and the last error I get is: label / not found. What went wrong? I'd guess your boot line has something like root=LABEL=/ and you dont have a filesystem which is marked as label = / To start, you could either label a filesystem as '/' or, you can just change that root= line to point at a real filesystem. Also, I can see you are still doing your old ask on the list rather than actually work out what the problem is trick :/ -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] YUM and installing older versions of software.
How does one specify a particular version of a software package to yum to install? Is this even possible? What happens to superceded pacjkages in repos? Are they simple removed/discarded? yum install package-X.Y.Z-A.el5 ??? The reason I ask is if a yum update goes awry for some reason then how does one revert to the previous (working) version? I seem to recall that up2date had a feature whereby one could locally archive superseded packages and rollback to a previous version was required. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] custom kernel cant find label /
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : Also, I can see you are still doing your old ask on the list rather than actually work out what the problem is trick :/ Oh, cool (for me), someone took over for me mhr BFG ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] custom kernel cant find label /
Karanbir Singh wrote: Jerry Geis wrote: I installed centos 4.6 on a USB thumbdrive. It installed and booted after install. I then put a custom kernel on, build it as I should, on rebooting and selecting my kernel to load from grub I it starts up and all and the last error I get is: label / not found. What went wrong? I'd guess your boot line has something like root=LABEL=/ and you dont have a filesystem which is marked as label = / To start, you could either label a filesystem as '/' or, you can just change that root= line to point at a real filesystem. what WOULD be the 'real device' in the case of a USB thumbdrive? since its the boot device, would it necessarily be enumerated first, hence always /dev/sda ? or would it be after any other /dev/sd? that happen to be present on the system, which would mean that its device name is quite unpredictable? OTOH, using LABEL=/ could be very problematic if there are any OTHER devices present with a filesystem that has LABEL=/ ... I'd wonder if you wouldn't want to use LABEL=USBROOT or some such (and label the USB stick accordingly). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] YUM and installing older versions of software.
James B. Byrne wrote: How does one specify a particular version of a software package to yum to install? Is this even possible? What happens to superceded pacjkages in repos? Are they simple removed/discarded? yum install package-X.Y.Z-A.el5 ??? The yum version in 5.2 will have a --allow-downgrade option. Cheers, Ralph pgpGUGRny75uM.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server.
Environment: - CentOS 5.1, - Apache 2.2.3 - php 5.1.6 - phpMyAdmin 2.11.6 - MySQL 5.0.22 Brand new system, brand new installation of all the above products. All looks well, but when I try to connect to phpMyAdmin, I get an error: Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server. I'll forgo all the paths I followed trying to get this to work and cut to the solution: I renamed the phpMyAdmin directory to pma, copied all files in the pma directory to a new phpMyAdmin (FWIIW, using 'cp -pr'), and voilà, problem vanished. (I cannot explain why I even tried that.) My first idea was that maybe the copy somehow resolved some issue at the directory level, but when I output an 'ls -laR' of the two directories to two files, 'diff' shows both files to be identical (apart from the timestamps on . and .. directories). The pma and phpMyAdmin directories reside in the same documentroot, have the same ownership, and the same permissions. This must be about the weirdest experience in my professional career. If anyone can shed a light on this, it'd be most welcome. I still have the original (malfunctioning) directory on the system to bounce ideas off if anyone has any inspiration (system will go live this weekend). Kind regards, Herta -- Life on Earth may be expensive, but it comes with a free ride around the Sun. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: custom kernel cant find label /
Jerry Geis wrote: / I installed centos 4.6 on a USB thumbdrive. // It installed and booted after install. // // I then put a custom kernel on, build it as I should, // on rebooting and selecting my kernel to load from grub I it starts up // and all // and the last error I get is: // // label / not found. // // What went wrong? / I'd guess your boot line has something like root=LABEL=/ and you dont have a filesystem which is marked as label = / To start, you could either label a filesystem as '/' or, you can just change that root= line to point at a real filesystem. Also, I can see you are still doing your old ask on the list rather than actually work out what the problem is trick :/ Karanbir, Running e2label /dev/sda1 reports that in fact the partition is / My kernel boot line is infact root=LABEL=/ My issue here is that I did the initial install. This install boots with the LABEL=/ just fine. After the custom kernel build it does not boot. I'm trying to find out if there is an option in the config that is needed for these label boots. Perhaps one of these: (I dont know if I am fishing here and/or which one would do it) CONFIG_NETLABEL CONFIG_BSD_DISKLABEL CONFIG_UNIXWARE_DISKLABEL I did search and wasn't finding what I was looking for, then I posted. I have not changed the line to try root=/dev/sda1 as I was trying to make it work the same way. Thanks for helping. Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
Karanbir Singh wrote: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: If they manage to port all the Fedora extras over for EL then I would say that is pretty darn close to one-stop shop for RPMs. Of course no repo can have it all. There are always the questionable items like closed source drivers and codecs which should be isolated. Ross, you are obviously interested in the flames more than anything else, and as Rex already pointed out in a hintting kind of way, lots of us are no longer interested in that. Then why are you still talking? You need to go back and workout what a real resourceful repo should / could / would have. If EPEL gives you all that, your' done. For a vast majority of the rest of us, it doesnt and the way their mandate works, it wont. This is a CentOS users list. It is for users of CentOS to FREELY voice their opinions on and about CentOS. If you don't like my opinion, fine, but you have no right to tell me I am wrong. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] custom kernel cant find label /
John R Pierce wrote: To start, you could either label a filesystem as '/' or, you can just change that root= line to point at a real filesystem. what WOULD be the 'real device' in the case of a USB thumbdrive? since its the boot device, would it necessarily be enumerated first, hence always /dev/sda ? or would it be after any other /dev/sd? that happen to be present on the system, which would mean that its device name is quite unpredictable? OTOH, using LABEL=/ could be very problematic if there are any OTHER devices present with a filesystem that has LABEL=/ ... I'd wonder if you wouldn't want to use LABEL=USBROOT or some such (and label the USB stick accordingly). based on the other emails from Jerry recently, I'd assume that the usb drive is the only mass storage device he has in the machine, so /dev/sda should be predictable. But then, isnt this the exact issue that Labels' are supposed to resolve ? Your recommendations of labeling the partition with something that is specific to the device ( label=USBROOT or label=USBKEYOSROOT ) might be a good 'middle path' here. Might need to do something similar for the swap and then sanity check /etc/fstab -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: custom kernel cant find label /
Jerry Geis wrote: Running e2label /dev/sda1 reports that in fact the partition is / My kernel boot line is infact root=LABEL=/ My issue here is that I did the initial install. This install boots with the LABEL=/ just fine. After the custom kernel build it does not boot. I'm trying to find out if there is an option in the config that is needed for these label boots. Perhaps one of these: (I dont know if I am fishing here and/or which one would do it) CONFIG_NETLABEL CONFIG_BSD_DISKLABEL CONFIG_UNIXWARE_DISKLABEL How about Diff the config's from the stock kernel and yours ? Although, if the kernel speaks ext3 it should be fine for labels, as far as I can tell off the top of my head. I did search and wasn't finding what I was looking for, then I posted. I have not changed the line to try root=/dev/sda1 as I was trying to make it work the same way. That might be worth trying, its a simple hack and it will tell you if your kernel even boots or not. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: You need to go back and workout what a real resourceful repo should / could / would have. If EPEL gives you all that, your' done. For a vast majority of the rest of us, it doesnt and the way their mandate works, it wont. This is a CentOS users list. It is for users of CentOS to FREELY voice their opinions on and about CentOS. If you don't like my opinion, fine, but you have no right to tell me I am wrong. But you are wrong, you claimed with authority that EPEL are trying to be the everything-repo, which they are not and cant be. You are free to voice an opinion, but if you are wrong, you are wrong. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server.
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 at 7:32pm, Herta Van den Eynde wrote Environment: - CentOS 5.1, - Apache 2.2.3 - php 5.1.6 - phpMyAdmin 2.11.6 - MySQL 5.0.22 Brand new system, brand new installation of all the above products. All looks well, but when I try to connect to phpMyAdmin, I get an error: Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server. I'll forgo all the paths I followed trying to get this to work and cut to the solution: I renamed the phpMyAdmin directory to pma, copied all files in the pma directory to a new phpMyAdmin (FWIIW, using 'cp -pr'), and voilà, problem vanished. (I cannot explain why I even tried that.) My first idea was that maybe the copy somehow resolved some issue at the directory level, but when I output an 'ls -laR' of the two directories to two files, 'diff' shows both files to be identical (apart from the timestamps on . and .. directories). The pma and phpMyAdmin directories reside in the same documentroot, have the same ownership, and the same permissions. This must be about the weirdest experience in my professional career. If anyone can shed a light on this, it'd be most welcome. I still have the original (malfunctioning) directory on the system to bounce ideas off if anyone has any inspiration (system will go live this weekend). 2 things spring to mind: 1) httpd config with directory based allow/deny 2) selinux -- Joshua Baker-LePain QB3 Shared Cluster Sysadmin UCSF___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If they manage to port all the Fedora extras over for EL then I would say that is pretty darn close to one-stop shop for RPMs. Assuming that all software ever needed by anybody exists in Fedora ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CN=Nasreddine Kroun/OU=Benefits/O=Vitech is out of the office.
On 6/18/08, Nasreddine Kroun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will be out of the office starting 06/18/2008 and will not return until 06/19/2008. Probably I will be back to the office by this afternoon, but I'm not sure. I suggest that you get another email account, for this and any other mailing lists you subscribe to, so the mailing lists will not receive Auto Responders like the above, from your normal email account. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: custom kernel cant find label /
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 06:43:53PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: Jerry Geis wrote: I have not changed the line to try root=/dev/sda1 as I was trying to make it work the same way. That might be worth trying, its a simple hack and it will tell you if your kernel even boots or not. Also, what would happen if there were two filesystems labeled as / ? eg /dev/hda1 and /dev/sda1 ? It might make sense to label the USB thumbdrive as USBroot and modify fstab and grub informtation accordingly. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
Karanbir Singh wrote: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: You need to go back and workout what a real resourceful repo should / could / would have. If EPEL gives you all that, your' done. For a vast majority of the rest of us, it doesnt and the way their mandate works, it wont. This is a CentOS users list. It is for users of CentOS to FREELY voice their opinions on and about CentOS. If you don't like my opinion, fine, but you have no right to tell me I am wrong. But you are wrong, you claimed with authority that EPEL are trying to be the everything-repo, which they are not and cant be. You are free to voice an opinion, but if you are wrong, you are wrong. If EPEL does not play with other repos and does not intend to, then one can extrapolate from that they are intending or aiming to be a one-stop repo. Whether they are successful in that endeavor is left to the user to decide. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server.
Thanks for the suggestions, Joshua. I'm using the standard apache config, which rules out suggestion 1. SELinux is enabled, but I'm new to it. How could that cause this effect? Kind regards, Herta 2008/6/18 Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 at 7:32pm, Herta Van den Eynde wrote Environment: - CentOS 5.1, - Apache 2.2.3 - php 5.1.6 - phpMyAdmin 2.11.6 - MySQL 5.0.22 Brand new system, brand new installation of all the above products. All looks well, but when I try to connect to phpMyAdmin, I get an error: Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server. I'll forgo all the paths I followed trying to get this to work and cut to the solution: I renamed the phpMyAdmin directory to pma, copied all files in the pma directory to a new phpMyAdmin (FWIIW, using 'cp -pr'), and voilà, problem vanished. (I cannot explain why I even tried that.) My first idea was that maybe the copy somehow resolved some issue at the directory level, but when I output an 'ls -laR' of the two directories to two files, 'diff' shows both files to be identical (apart from the timestamps on . and .. directories). The pma and phpMyAdmin directories reside in the same documentroot, have the same ownership, and the same permissions. This must be about the weirdest experience in my professional career. If anyone can shed a light on this, it'd be most welcome. I still have the original (malfunctioning) directory on the system to bounce ideas off if anyone has any inspiration (system will go live this weekend). 2 things spring to mind: 1) httpd config with directory based allow/deny 2) selinux -- Joshua Baker-LePain QB3 Shared Cluster Sysadmin UCSF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Life on Earth may be expensive, but it comes with a free ride around the Sun. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
Bent Terp wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If they manage to port all the Fedora extras over for EL then I would say that is pretty darn close to one-stop shop for RPMs. Assuming that all software ever needed by anybody exists in Fedora Of course it won't be, it never will, but what isn't can be obtained either through, 1) building your own RPM, 2) downloading another pre-built RPM, or 3) building from source in /usr/local. The idea is to have a repo where the occurrence of such is at a minimal. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] custom kernel cant find label /
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jerry Geis wrote: What went wrong? Also, I can see you are still doing your old ask on the list rather than actually work out what the problem is trick :/ Jerry, You have been posting a lot of questions and getting a lot of help as well. Maybe it's time for you to give something back to the community? For example, it would be nice if you could respond to the question directed to you: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-May/099299.html Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: howto use kvm-amd on centos 5.1
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists at karan.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos wrote: / Jerry Geis wrote: // // What went wrong? // // Also, I can see you are still doing your old ask on the list rather than // actually work out what the problem is trick :/ / Jerry, You have been posting a lot of questions and getting a lot of help as well. Maybe it's time for you to give something back to the community? For example, it would be nice if you could respond to the question directed to you: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-May/099299.html Akemi, Sorry if I missed your question back in may. I travel at times and must have missed it. Yes I did try what Daniel had suggested at that time and it did work as he said. Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] remote access info please
Hi ya'll, I built a new CentOS 5.1 server for a client, housing a Lotus Notes / Domino server, and various other virtualized IBM software server guests, and soon will have to physically move that server to another distant location. My question is that I will need secure access to those servers via X, not just the C/L terminal. What do you recommend for a good secure CentOS program which would do this. Would also want to access via a high port, but I am sure just about any program will allow this to be manually configured. Thanks for your help and input. -- Regards, Gary ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [SPAM]Re: [CentOS] using windows ad accounts for centos 5
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Leafey
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:35 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [SPAM]Re: [CentOS] using windows ad accounts for centos 5
Isaac Gonzalez wrote:
Hi I read and used the article
http://blog.wazollc.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=2 to authenticate my
ad accounts when logging on to cent 5…however, once I edit the
nsswitch.conf file, I can’t even log on as root or any local users
anymore. Kinit seems to initialize fine doing a kinit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , however doing a
getent passwd adusername ….it just sits there in the shell and does
nothing. I actually had to put all files back to where they were
before the change to even be able to login locally or use sudo.
I followed the steps line by line on this article but get stuck
everytime….anyone has an idea or a better documented way of achieving
what I am trying to do , please let me know.
Thanks,
Isaac
I'm using AD-via-Kerberos to authenticate users on several CentOS 5.1 systems.
Setting it up was as easy as a
single command line:
authconfig \
--usemd5 --useshadow --enablelocauthorize \
--enablekrb5 \
--krb5realm={AD Domain Name} \
--enablekrb5kdcdns --enablekrb5realmdns --update
This makes the necessary changes to /etc/krb5.conf, /etc/ and
/etc/nsswitch.conf. I am NOT using this for user
information, just password authentication, so I add user accounts for each
authorized user.
You can also consider using the --disablesysnetauth flag, which disables
authenticating system accounts via
the network services and forces them to use local authorization. This should
prevent entries in the AD for
root and other system accounts from being used.
Hope that helps!
--
Jay Leafey - Memphis, TN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok no more errors with the pam file...guess my repos was out of sync.
Jay, did you have to put in the hostname of the dc that actually performs the
Kerberos auth? I am wondering if I need to specify this in the command or the
krb5.conf file ...It is not working for me. I am using MYDOMAINNAME.COM as the
AD domain name with and without brackets around it. Time is synced to dc.
Thanks,
Isaac
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server.
--- On Wed, 6/18/08, Herta Van den Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Herta Van den Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS] Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server. To: centos@centos.org Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 10:32 AM Environment: - CentOS 5.1, - Apache 2.2.3 - php 5.1.6 - phpMyAdmin 2.11.6 - MySQL 5.0.22 Brand new system, brand new installation of all the above products. All looks well, but when I try to connect to phpMyAdmin, I get an error: Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server. I'll forgo all the paths I followed trying to get this to work and cut to the solution: I renamed the phpMyAdmin directory to pma, copied all files in the pma directory to a new phpMyAdmin Make the small Config file below. Notice that the folder is now above your web root (/var/www/html/) http://localhost/pma -- will navigate to the new install /etc/httpd/conf.d/phpMyAdmin.conf --- Alias /pma /var/www/phpMyAdmin directory /var/www/phpMyAdmin Order allow,deny Allow from all Options all Options +includes /directory end snip - -- Mark http://www.tlviewer.org/centos/ (my repo with rt3 included) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: howto use kvm-amd on centos 5.1
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jerry, You have been posting a lot of questions and getting a lot of help as well. Maybe it's time for you to give something back to the community? For example, it would be nice if you could respond to the question directed to you: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-May/099299.html Akemi, Sorry if I missed your question back in may. I travel at times and must have missed it. Yes I did try what Daniel had suggested at that time and it did work as he said. Jerry Thanks for the reply. Glad to learn kvm worked for you. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: apt on Centos 5.1
on 6-18-2008 5:52 AM Johnny Hughes spake the following: Mike wrote: Just read on planet centos that you can easily install apt on Centos too using yum. However, I get : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum install apt Loading installonlyn plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Nothing to do So not sure what I am missing .. And sorry if this isn't the right place to ask :) Linux and CentOS are about choice. Dag is a CentOS Developer and he does like apt. I'm sure Dag (and others) can help with apt questions here. That said there are alot of features in yum (like fastestmirror, priorities, installonlyn, and repoquery) that are not available in apt. There are also probably features in apt that are not in yum. Apt may easy to install and user friendly ... heck, it may even be better than yum, however it is not officially supported. The officially supported way to do updates on CentOS is yum ... and yumex is in the CentOS Extras repo as a GUI based system for updates. You can certainly ask about apt on CentOS here, though most of the CentOS developers use yum and the QA testing we do is with yum and not apt. This is not meant to be negative about apt use, just point out that yum is the official way to do updates. Thanks, Johnny Hughes And I would assume that apt won't be able to update from the CentOS repos. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: nss_ldap (was Re: Could this be an advantage of CentOS over the PNAELV distribution?_
on 6-18-2008 6:34 AM Johnny Hughes spake the following: Meenoo Shivdasani wrote: There is a bug with nss_ldap and bash32 ... I created a new RPM for the nss_ldap that is currently in our testing repo. Johnny, I was wondering if that RPM includes the security fixes detailed in https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0389.html Yes, it contains all the pathces for that issue and has a work around for the bash32 issue. Note: This file is in our testing repo and will not be released on the ISOs or in the Updates repo ... but will be in the release notes and can be used by users who would LIKE to try it. We also created a kernel for bz32 that is in testing repo as well (that is fixed in 5.2). CentOS routinely creates patched RPMs like these to make available to our users (and upstream users / testers if they want). We also actively submit and track bugs and patches (if we have a fix) to the upstream bugzilla all the time. However, we do NOT roll these fixes in until they come down from upstream ... as we aim for binary compatibility, even for bugs. That is the only way to ensure things work the same. We also want to make the entire EL codebase better, not fork our EL codebase away from upsream like Oracle does with unbreakable linux. Thanks, Johnny Hughes I am sure that RH appreciates it also. The fact that CentOS contributes so much probably give them a favored stepchild status, instead of just a user. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] remote access info please
Gary wrote: Hi ya'll, I built a new CentOS 5.1 server for a client, housing a Lotus Notes / Domino server, and various other virtualized IBM software server guests, and soon will have to physically move that server to another distant location. My question is that I will need secure access to those servers via X, not just the C/L terminal. What do you recommend for a good secure CentOS program which would do this. Would also want to access via a high port, but I am sure just about any program will allow this to be manually configured. Thanks for your help and input. Gary, You can run X apps over ssh if you use the -Y option. You can also configure ssh to use a non-standard port in it's config page. I also believe you can port (tunnel?) VNC through ssh, but I have only heard about that, so I may be off here. VNC is part of the standard CentOS distribution. HTH, Monty ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:38:49 +0100 Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: rpmfusion never intended to support CentOS or any EL distro, they are very much Fedora centric, so you should go talk to them about it The very first line on the web page at http://rpmfusion.org says RPM Fusion is a merger of the following package repositories for Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux . -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server.
on 6-18-2008 10:32 AM Herta Van den Eynde spake the following: Environment: - CentOS 5.1, - Apache 2.2.3 - php 5.1.6 - phpMyAdmin 2.11.6 - MySQL 5.0.22 Brand new system, brand new installation of all the above products. All looks well, but when I try to connect to phpMyAdmin, I get an error: Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server. I'll forgo all the paths I followed trying to get this to work and cut to the solution: I renamed the phpMyAdmin directory to pma, copied all files in the pma directory to a new phpMyAdmin (FWIIW, using 'cp -pr'), and voil�, problem vanished. (I cannot explain why I even tried that.) My first idea was that maybe the copy somehow resolved some issue at the directory level, but when I output an 'ls -laR' of the two directories to two files, 'diff' shows both files to be identical (apart from the timestamps on . and .. directories). The pma and phpMyAdmin directories reside in the same documentroot, have the same ownership, and the same permissions. This must be about the weirdest experience in my professional career. If anyone can shed a light on this, it'd be most welcome. I still have the original (malfunctioning) directory on the system to bounce ideas off if anyone has any inspiration (system will go live this weekend). Kind regards, Herta Just a side note, but pma is one of the directories the script kiddies hammer on my servers regularly. You had better hide it better than that, or make sure it isn't accessible from the world. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] need advise on protect base and priorities plugin
Hi, Is it not ok to use both plugins at the same time? I have read from the wiki page of centos that you must use only either protect base or priorities plugin. I have been using the the config file below for months and did not encounter any problems. I used priority=1 and protect=1 on base and updates (addons,extras protect=1 ; set no priorities) for the CentOS-Base repo and on the rpmforge repo I used protect=0 and did not set any priority. Should I enable only one (protect base or priorities) and not both? Thanks. [base] name=CentOS-$releasever - Base mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releaseverarch=$basearchrepo=os #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 priority=1 protect=1 #released updates [updates] name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releaseverarch=$basearchrepo=updates #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/updates/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 priority=1 protect=1 #packages used/produced in the build but not released [addons] name=CentOS-$releasever - Addons mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releaseverarch=$basearchrepo=addons #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/addons/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 protect=1 #additional packages that may be useful [extras] name=CentOS-$releasever - Extras mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releaseverarch=$basearchrepo=extras #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/extras/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 protect=1 #additional packages that extend functionality of existing packages [centosplus] name=CentOS-$releasever - Plus mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releaseverarch=$basearchrepo=centosplus #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/centosplus/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 enabled=0 gpgkey=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 protect=0 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] remote access info please
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:41:00 -0500 Monty Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also believe you can port (tunnel?) VNC through ssh, but I have only heard about that, so I may be off here. You can indeed do that. It's very easy to set up and any number of web pages contain step-by-step instructions for how to make it work. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] need advise on protect base and priorities plugin
ceejay cervantes wrote: Is it not ok to use both plugins at the same time? No it isn't. Use priorities (newer) as it allows more flexible control over protectbase (older). Other then that your configs look fine. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 what does your /etc/httpd/conf.d/phpmyadmin.conf look like? By default, it has a Allow 127.0.0.1 in it. Scott Silva wrote: | on 6-18-2008 10:32 AM Herta Van den Eynde spake the following: | Environment: | - CentOS 5.1, | - Apache 2.2.3 | - php 5.1.6 | - phpMyAdmin 2.11.6 | - MySQL 5.0.22 | | Brand new system, brand new installation of all the above products. | All looks well, but when I try to connect to phpMyAdmin, I get an | error: Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ | on this server. | | I'll forgo all the paths I followed trying to get this to work and cut | to the solution: I renamed the phpMyAdmin directory to pma, copied | all files in the pma directory to a new phpMyAdmin (FWIIW, using 'cp | -pr'), and voil?, problem vanished. (I cannot explain why I even | tried that.) | | My first idea was that maybe the copy somehow resolved some issue at | the directory level, but when I output an 'ls -laR' of the two | directories to two files, 'diff' shows both files to be identical | (apart from the timestamps on . and .. directories). The pma and | phpMyAdmin directories reside in the same documentroot, have the same | ownership, and the same permissions. | | This must be about the weirdest experience in my professional career. | If anyone can shed a light on this, it'd be most welcome. I still | have the original (malfunctioning) directory on the system to bounce | ideas off if anyone has any inspiration (system will go live this | weekend). | | Kind regards, | | Herta | Just a side note, but pma is one of the directories the script kiddies | hammer on my servers regularly. You had better hide it better than that, | or make sure it isn't accessible from the world. | | | - | | ___ | CentOS mailing list | CentOS@centos.org | http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos - -- Milton Calnek BSc, A/Slt(Ret.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 306-717-8737 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIWWBYHgnbf2T2QqMRAnS8AKCiCHPalrXmuvVhD+25eynB0VNEvQCghoy1 DtdxwND9e32HiODRzHDvAWc= =AYkD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:24:40 +0100 Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And do any of those repo's listed there produce rpms for EL ? Even if they don't do it today, perhaps they are planning to start with the launch of rpmfusion. Or not. I'm just going on what the rpmfusion web page says, and it says Red Hat Enterprise Linux. I know quite a few of the people who are involved in rpmfusion, some even personally, and I wasent joking. They really were not considering EL at all till they get the fedora stuff sorted and the decision at the time was to reconsider a few years down the road. That's not what their web page currently says. However, in view of the fact that you know quite a few of the people who are involved in rpmfusion (and I don't), then you're a good guy to ask: Unless I've missed something (which is possible) there hasn't been any public progress announcements regarding rpmfusion in the past several weeks. Is there anything new to report? (This question still hasn't been answered.) -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rpmfusion status?
Frank Cox wrote: Is there anything new to report? (This question still hasn't been answered.) if you go ask on the Fedora lists and their own lists at rpmfusion, I am sure they will tell you :D Ignacio already did hint at what the situation was though. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: remote access info please
on 6-18-2008 12:13 PM Frank Cox spake the following: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:41:00 -0500 Monty Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also believe you can port (tunnel?) VNC through ssh, but I have only heard about that, so I may be off here. You can indeed do that. It's very easy to set up and any number of web pages contain step-by-step instructions for how to make it work. And with putty and XMing you can even do it from a (cough, duck) Windows machine. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] remote access info please
Hi Frank, On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:13:12 -0600 UTC (6/18/2008, 2:13 PM -0500 UTC my time), Frank Cox wrote: I also believe you can port (tunnel?) VNC through ssh, but I have only heard about that, so I may be off here. F You can indeed do that. It's very easy to set up and any number of web pages F contain step-by-step instructions for how to make it work. Thanks also to Nate and Monty for your input. This is probably the best way to go, as anyone can sniff the wire without it. I see I can run this as a service also, but I can't seem to find the VNC client (for Windows) in any directory. Would I get this off of the realvnc site, or is it included in the CentOS 5.1 distro? -- Gary ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] remote access info please
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:02:53 -0500 Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see I can run this as a service also, but I can't seem to find the VNC client (for Windows) in any directory. Would I get this off of the realvnc site, or is it included in the CentOS 5.1 distro? Why would you expect to find a VNC client for Windows on a Centos distribution? yum install vnc will get you the Centos client, and yum install vnc-server will get you the Centos vnc server, if that's what you meant to ask. You probably already have vnc-server installed if you see it in the list of available services, though. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5
I thought I would turn here before giving up. I am trying to install Twiki 4.2 on CentOS 5 with all updates. (I also tried Twiki 4.1.2 as well) I am running a custom rolled Apache 2.2.8 server and custom rolled PHP 5.2.6 (built with oracle support). These work and are rock solid. I've been using the same config with very heavy duty scripts and php applications with no issues. When trying to run /twiki/bin/configure I get the following error when clicking Next: Software error: Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at (eval 25) line 23. The Apache error log says pretty much the same thing. (like 23 by the way points to a commented line; the first 100 or so lines in this script are comments.. If I don't count the commented lines there is no search regexp anywhere near line 23) I then tried version 4.1.2 and the same thing. I googled and found numerous other people having this problem. I have found no responses or solutions. The twiki support site has yielded nothing as well. Just hoping someone here might have sorted this out.. I have set up dozens of twiki sites but haven't played with it in a 2 years or so and wondering... It was never this difficult before.. Three of us have now triple checked every file permissions, installation step, system pre-requisite, etc... Thanks for any help, CC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] remote access info please
Gary wrote: My question is that I will need secure access to those servers via X, not just the C/L terminal. What do you recommend for a good secure CentOS program which would do this. Would also want to access via a high port, but I am sure just about any program will allow this to be manually configured. I use NX and find it amazing. I downloaded the RPMs from nomachine.com because I had not found that they are built in one of the repos (testing if memory serves). -- Sincerely, John Thomas ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: remote access info please
Hi Scott, On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:58:09 -0700 UTC (6/18/2008, 2:58 PM -0500 UTC my time), Scott Silva wrote: You can indeed do that. It's very easy to set up and any number of web pages contain step-by-step instructions for how to make it work. S And with putty and XMing you can even do it from a (cough, duck) Windows machine. yep, that's what I was thinking too... sometimes have to use Windows depending on physically where I am. thanks for your input -- Gary ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server.
2008/6/18 Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]: on 6-18-2008 10:32 AM Herta Van den Eynde spake the following: Environment: - CentOS 5.1, - Apache 2.2.3 - php 5.1.6 - phpMyAdmin 2.11.6 - MySQL 5.0.22 Brand new system, brand new installation of all the above products. All looks well, but when I try to connect to phpMyAdmin, I get an error: Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server. I'll forgo all the paths I followed trying to get this to work and cut to the solution: I renamed the phpMyAdmin directory to pma, copied all files in the pma directory to a new phpMyAdmin (FWIIW, using 'cp -pr'), and voil�, problem vanished. (I cannot explain why I even tried that.) My first idea was that maybe the copy somehow resolved some issue at the directory level, but when I output an 'ls -laR' of the two directories to two files, 'diff' shows both files to be identical (apart from the timestamps on . and .. directories). The pma and phpMyAdmin directories reside in the same documentroot, have the same ownership, and the same permissions. This must be about the weirdest experience in my professional career. If anyone can shed a light on this, it'd be most welcome. I still have the original (malfunctioning) directory on the system to bounce ideas off if anyone has any inspiration (system will go live this weekend). Kind regards, Herta Just a side note, but pma is one of the directories the script kiddies hammer on my servers regularly. You had better hide it better than that, or make sure it isn't accessible from the world. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't Thanks for the tip, Scott. I'll rename it again. Kind regards, Herta ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server.
2008/6/18 Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]: on 6-18-2008 12:22 PM Milton Calnek spake the following: what does your /etc/httpd/conf.d/phpmyadmin.conf look like? By default, it has a Allow 127.0.0.1 in it. I'm not using it, I just see the attempts. There must be some vulnerability, at least in older versions, or there wouldn't be a script out there to exploit it. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I don't see how it could be config related. Like I said, I originally had a directory called phpMyAdmin, which didn't work. I renamed it to pma (to make sure the uppercase characters weren't causing problems). It still didn't work. I then copied it to a new directory named phpMyAdmin, just like the original directory (cp -pr pma phpMyAdmin). The new phpMyAdmin directory works fine. No config changes in between. For good measure, I copied it again to yet another directory (cp -pr pma tst). That other directory works just fine as well. Again without changing anything in the configs. Kind regards, Herta -- Life on Earth may be expensive, but it comes with a free ride around the Sun. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5
Are you positive that you have all of the required Perl modules (and the correct versions)? http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/TWiki04x02/TWikiSystemRequirements#Require d_CPAN_Modules Twiki is Perl based, so the PHP on your system should be benign Mike From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 15:23 To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5 I thought I would turn here before giving up. I am trying to install Twiki 4.2 on CentOS 5 with all updates. (I also tried Twiki 4.1.2 as well) I am running a custom rolled Apache 2.2.8 server and custom rolled PHP 5.2.6 (built with oracle support). These work and are rock solid. I've been using the same config with very heavy duty scripts and php applications with no issues. When trying to run /twiki/bin/configure I get the following error when clicking Next: Software error: Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at (eval 25) line 23. The Apache error log says pretty much the same thing. (like 23 by the way points to a commented line; the first 100 or so lines in this script are comments.. If I don't count the commented lines there is no search regexp anywhere near line 23) I then tried version 4.1.2 and the same thing. I googled and found numerous other people having this problem. I have found no responses or solutions. The twiki support site has yielded nothing as well. Just hoping someone here might have sorted this out.. I have set up dozens of twiki sites but haven't played with it in a 2 years or so and wondering... It was never this difficult before.. Three of us have now triple checked every file permissions, installation step, system pre-requisite, etc... Thanks for any help, CC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server.
2008/6/18 Mark Pryor [EMAIL PROTECTED]: --- On Wed, 6/18/08, Herta Van den Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Herta Van den Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS] Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server. To: centos@centos.org Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 10:32 AM Environment: - CentOS 5.1, - Apache 2.2.3 - php 5.1.6 - phpMyAdmin 2.11.6 - MySQL 5.0.22 Brand new system, brand new installation of all the above products. All looks well, but when I try to connect to phpMyAdmin, I get an error: Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /phpMyAdmin/ on this server. I'll forgo all the paths I followed trying to get this to work and cut to the solution: I renamed the phpMyAdmin directory to pma, copied all files in the pma directory to a new phpMyAdmin Make the small Config file below. Notice that the folder is now above your web root (/var/www/html/) http://localhost/pma -- will navigate to the new install /etc/httpd/conf.d/phpMyAdmin.conf --- Alias /pma /var/www/phpMyAdmin directory /var/www/phpMyAdmin Order allow,deny Allow from all Options all Options +includes /directory end snip - -- Mark http://www.tlviewer.org/centos/ (my repo with rt3 included) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos It's one of the things I tried when I still believed I messed up on the config. (I didn't have the Options +includes, but then I had no includes.) Kind regards, Herta -- Life on Earth may be expensive, but it comes with a free ride around the Sun. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5
Yes.. All perl modules, including the optional ones are installed (including clean 'make test''s) Yea not sure why I mention the custom PHP version.. Meant to mention the perl version which is 5.8.8. -C On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Mike Hanby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you positive that you have all of the required Perl modules (and the correct versions)? http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/TWiki04x02/TWikiSystemRequirements#Required_CPAN_Modules Twiki is Perl based, so the PHP on your system should be benign Mike *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Chuck *Sent:* Wednesday, June 18, 2008 15:23 *To:* centos@centos.org *Subject:* [CentOS] Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5 I thought I would turn here before giving up. I am trying to install Twiki 4.2 on CentOS 5 with all updates. (I also tried Twiki 4.1.2 as well) I am running a custom rolled Apache 2.2.8 server and custom rolled PHP 5.2.6 (built with oracle support). These work and are rock solid. I've been using the same config with very heavy duty scripts and php applications with no issues. When trying to run /twiki/bin/configure I get the following error when clicking Next: Software error: Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at (eval 25) line 23. The Apache error log says pretty much the same thing. (like 23 by the way points to a commented line; the first 100 or so lines in this script are comments.. If I don't count the commented lines there is no search regexp anywhere near line 23) I then tried version 4.1.2 and the same thing. I googled and found numerous other people having this problem. I have found no responses or solutions. The twiki support site has yielded nothing as well. Just hoping someone here might have sorted this out.. I have set up dozens of twiki sites but haven't played with it in a 2 years or so and wondering... It was never this difficult before.. Three of us have now triple checked every file permissions, installation step, system pre-requisite, etc... Thanks for any help, CC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Chuck Carson - Sr. Systems Administrator Northrop Grumman Austin, Texas ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] need advise on protect base and priorities plugin
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Use priorities (newer) as it allows more flexible control over protectbase (older). Should we then uninstall the protectbase plugin once we are using the priorities plugin? Probably a dumb question, but I think we should be very clear about this. Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] need advise on protect base and priorities plugin
MHR wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Use priorities (newer) as it allows more flexible control over protectbase (older). Should we then uninstall the protectbase plugin once we are using the priorities plugin? Probably a dumb question, but I think we should be very clear about this. Yes. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5
Chuck wrote: I thought I would turn here before giving up. I am trying to install Twiki 4.2 on CentOS 5 with all updates. (I also tried Twiki 4.1.2 as well) I am running a custom rolled Apache 2.2.8 server and custom rolled PHP 5.2.6 (built with oracle support). These work and are rock solid. I've been using the same config with very heavy duty scripts and php applications with no issues. When trying to run /twiki/bin/configure I get the following error when clicking Next: Software error: Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at (eval 25) line 23. The Apache error log says pretty much the same thing. (like 23 by the way points to a commented line; the first 100 or so lines in this script are comments.. If I don't count the commented lines there is no search regexp anywhere near line 23) I then tried version 4.1.2 and the same thing. I googled and found numerous other people having this problem. I have found no responses or solutions. The twiki support site has yielded nothing as well. Just hoping someone here might have sorted this out.. I have set up dozens of twiki sites but haven't played with it in a 2 years or so and wondering... It was never this difficult before.. Three of us have now triple checked every file permissions, installation step, system pre-requisite, etc... I have a 4.1.2 version running under Centos 5 without problems but had some similar issues trying to upgrade to 4.2, mostly in the configure and module installer routines, not normal operation. I think they have to do with mixing CPAN and RPMforge perl modules but I haven't completely pinned it down. Starting fresh, I'd try all EPEL modules for the perl bits missing in the stock repo. I think that will get you to a point where the only software error is a 'subroutine install redefined ...' when using the configure part to add plugins. -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5
Hmmm. That might be correct. I've drilled down into the configure script and it pukes here: print STDERR MARK 10.1\n; $query = new CGI; # It dies on this line print STDERR MARK 10.2\n; It never gets to MARK 10.2. I am using the CPAN version of CGI: cpan[1] install CGI CPAN: Storable loaded ok (v2.15) SNIP Going to write /root/.cpan/Metadata CGI is up to date (3.37). cpan[2] Grrr... Frustrating... Each time I've tried to use Twiki over the last few years we've ran into some show-stopping roadblock. (always been solaris until now, trying on centos this time) -CC On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chuck wrote: I thought I would turn here before giving up. I am trying to install Twiki 4.2 on CentOS 5 with all updates. (I also tried Twiki 4.1.2 as well) I am running a custom rolled Apache 2.2.8 server and custom rolled PHP 5.2.6 (built with oracle support). These work and are rock solid. I've been using the same config with very heavy duty scripts and php applications with no issues. When trying to run /twiki/bin/configure I get the following error when clicking Next: Software error: Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at (eval 25) line 23. The Apache error log says pretty much the same thing. (like 23 by the way points to a commented line; the first 100 or so lines in this script are comments.. If I don't count the commented lines there is no search regexp anywhere near line 23) I then tried version 4.1.2 and the same thing. I googled and found numerous other people having this problem. I have found no responses or solutions. The twiki support site has yielded nothing as well. Just hoping someone here might have sorted this out.. I have set up dozens of twiki sites but haven't played with it in a 2 years or so and wondering... It was never this difficult before.. Three of us have now triple checked every file permissions, installation step, system pre-requisite, etc... I have a 4.1.2 version running under Centos 5 without problems but had some similar issues trying to upgrade to 4.2, mostly in the configure and module installer routines, not normal operation. I think they have to do with mixing CPAN and RPMforge perl modules but I haven't completely pinned it down. Starting fresh, I'd try all EPEL modules for the perl bits missing in the stock repo. I think that will get you to a point where the only software error is a 'subroutine install redefined ...' when using the configure part to add plugins. -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Chuck Carson - Sr. Systems Administrator Northrop Grumman Austin, Texas ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Forbidden: You don't have permission to access/phpMyAdmin/ on this server.
Maybe this has already been suggested, but is the output identical for
the old and new directories using the following command:
ls -ldZ /var/www/html/{phpMyAdmin,pma}
The Z will show the SELinux security attributes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Herta Van den Eynde
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 15:45
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: You don't have permission to
access/phpMyAdmin/ on this server.
2008/6/18 Mark Pryor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--- On Wed, 6/18/08, Herta Van den Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Herta Van den Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS] Forbidden: You don't have permission to access
/phpMyAdmin/ on this server.
To: centos@centos.org
Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 10:32 AM
Environment:
- CentOS 5.1,
- Apache 2.2.3
- php 5.1.6
- phpMyAdmin 2.11.6
- MySQL 5.0.22
Brand new system, brand new installation of all the above
products.
All looks well, but when I try to connect to phpMyAdmin, I
get an
error: Forbidden: You don't have permission to
access /phpMyAdmin/
on this server.
I'll forgo all the paths I followed trying to get this
to work and cut
to the solution: I renamed the phpMyAdmin
directory to pma, copied
all files in the pma directory to a new phpMyAdmin
Make the small Config file below. Notice that the folder is
now above your web root (/var/www/html/)
http://localhost/pma -- will navigate to the new install
/etc/httpd/conf.d/phpMyAdmin.conf ---
Alias /pma /var/www/phpMyAdmin
directory /var/www/phpMyAdmin
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
Options all
Options +includes
/directory
end snip -
--
Mark
http://www.tlviewer.org/centos/ (my repo with rt3 included)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
It's one of the things I tried when I still believed I messed up on
the config. (I didn't have the Options +includes, but then I had no
includes.)
Kind regards,
Herta
--
Life on Earth may be expensive,
but it comes with a free ride around the Sun.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: Re: [CentOS] using windows ad accounts for centos 5
Please stop top posting - your messages are becoming incomprehensible. Thanks. mhr Sorry that's the default behavior of my email client. I managed to figure out my issue. Thanks, Isaac ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Pulling Hair Out - TWiki 4.2 on CentOS 5
Chuck wrote: Hmmm. That might be correct. I've drilled down into the configure script and it pukes here: print STDERR MARK 10.1\n; $query = new CGI; # It dies on this line print STDERR MARK 10.2\n; It never gets to MARK 10.2. I am using the CPAN version of CGI: cpan[1] install CGI CPAN: Storable loaded ok (v2.15) SNIP Going to write /root/.cpan/Metadata CGI is up to date (3.37). Many packages require many other sub-modules and the relationships sometimes change. Either CPAN or the RPM packages will have this consistent at any particular version, but you can install a newer CPAN part, then have one of the subcomponents it needs replaced by an older one that doesn't work in an RPM update - or something like that... If you pin it down, please let the rest of us know. -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: You don't have permission to access/phpMyAdmin/ on this server.
2008/6/18 Mike Hanby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe this has already been suggested, but is the output identical for
the old and new directories using the following command:
ls -ldZ /var/www/html/{phpMyAdmin,pma}
The Z will show the SELinux security attributes.
You found it, Mike!
Joshua previously suggested SELinux might have something to do with
it, but being new to it, I didn't know what to do with that info.
# ls -ldZ /var/www/html/{phpMyAdmin,pma}
drwxr-xr-x phpmy apache user_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t
/var/www/html/phpMyAdmin
drwxr-xr-x phpmy apache user_u:object_r:user_home_t /var/www/html/pma
I'll need to read up on what this means exactly. I originally
untarred the phpMyAdmin in my non-priv'ed home directory - which must
be the user_home_t reference - and then moved it over to its current
location.
I meanwhile switched to permissive mode. If SELinux is this tricky,
I'll have to find time to study it before enabling it again.
Thanks to all for thinking along.
Kind regards,
Herta
--
Life on Earth may be expensive,
but it comes with a free ride around the Sun.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Trouble brewing in dmesg... any ideas?
Hello fellow listers! I've got some errors starting to crop up on one of my CentOS5 boxes. Below is a transcript: viS 048C664F 2600 4176 2837 (NOTLB) f1c87b68 0082 c30229e0 048c664f 0e65 f1c87b18 0007 f7bacaa0 f7d97aa0 048c72fc 0e65 0cad 0003 f7bacbac c302a9e0 c042daae f7d2 f1c87b70 0286 00ed957a 00ed957a Call Trace: [c042daae] lock_timer_base+0x15/0x2f [c0604dfc] schedule_timeout+0x71/0x8c [c042d1d3] process_timeout+0x0/0x5 [c04803a8] do_select+0x371/0x3cb [c048092b] __pollwait+0x0/0xb2 [c04202b1] default_wake_function+0x0/0xc [c04202b1] default_wake_function+0x0/0xc [c06046b9] schedule+0x90d/0x9ba [c0436066] autoremove_wake_function+0xd/0x2d [c042daae] lock_timer_base+0x15/0x2f [c042dbbf] __mod_timer+0x99/0xa3 [c04d7a49] blk_plug_device+0x5e/0x85 [f884e2e2] make_request+0x520/0x52a [raid1] [f8860679] journal_stop+0x1b0/0x1ba [jbd] [c041fa31] enqueue_task+0x29/0x39 [c041f8de] task_rq_lock+0x31/0x58 [c04202a7] try_to_wake_up+0x371/0x37b [c041ea84] __wake_up_common+0x2f/0x53 [c041f871] __wake_up+0x2a/0x3d [c04806ab] core_sys_select+0x2a9/0x2ca [c052e771] n_tty_receive_buf+0xc5e/0xcab [c041ea84] __wake_up_common+0x2f/0x53 [c041f871] __wake_up+0x2a/0x3d [c0529c5e] tty_wakeup+0x44/0x48 [c04361fd] remove_wait_queue+0x16/0x25 [c041f871] __wake_up+0x2a/0x3d [c0529b9d] tty_ldisc_deref+0x50/0x5f [c0480c72] sys_select+0x9a/0x180 [c0404eff] syscall_call+0x7/0xb === There are others with various app names besides vi including httpd, named, sftp-server, etc.. Is this an imminent hardware failure? Do I have kernel issues? I've checked the system with lm_sensors and temps are perfectly normal. Also, performance and operation seems to be fine. Even with these errors, my services are running without any hiccups. HELP! :-) Tim Nelson Systems/Network Support Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Single crontab entry for every 15 minutes beginning ending on the hour
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a cron job that needs to run every 15 minutes throughout business hours. The first run is at 8:00, the last run is at 17:00. Is it possible to specify this time range in a single line? */15 8-17 * * 1-5 will run 8:00 - 17:45. That's not what I want. Likewise */15 8-16 * * 1-5 will have the last run at 16:45, not 17:00 This is more of a brainteaser than a real problem. I can easily configure the job with multiple entries, but I'm a little obsessive-compulsive so I want to try to do it with one entry. I'm pretty sure it's not possible to do in one line just in cron. You can do it with a bit of shell too: */15 8-17 * * 1-5 [ `date +\%H\%M` -lt 1715 ] /do/my/job.sh Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Kernel/harware question
Hello, I have an IBM Netvista and since kernel 2.6.9-34.0.2, I have not been able to upgrade to the latest kernel. If I do, in about 8 hours, the system becomes sluggish almost unresponsive. Currently I am running 4.6 but with the kernel mentioned above. I think I may have figured out the problem. It seems when I reboot with the new kernel, kudzu runs and wants to configure a different driver for this card, Intel Pro/100. If it does, it will cause the problem I mentioned. If I don't let it update the driver, it seems to be fine. So my question is how can I force it to use the driver from kernel 2.6.9-34.0.2? Is it something I need to add to grub.conf?? If so, what? TIA ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Kernel/harware question
Thomas Dukes wrote: So my question is how can I force it to use the driver from kernel 2.6.9-34.0.2? Is it something I need to add to grub.conf?? If so, what? You could disable kudzu if the driver config you have is what you want. I always disable kudzu on my systems after they are installed as my hardware changes are very rare, I can't remember the last time I used kudzu on a server. chkconfig --level 2345 kudzu off /etc/init.d/kudzu stop for me this happens automatically during kickstart. nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble brewing in dmesg... any ideas?
Tim Nelson wrote: There are others with various app names besides vi including httpd, named, sftp-server, etc.. Is this an imminent hardware failure? Do I have kernel issues? I've checked the system with lm_sensors and temps are perfectly normal. Also, performance and operation seems to be fine. Even with these errors, my services are running without any hiccups. HELP! :-) Would need to see the full error but it sounds like a kernel oops. For me at least the useful info would be at the top of the error which wasn't included in your email. Worst case, configure your system with a serial console and capture the error using a terminal emulator on another machine plugged into your serial console. nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble brewing in dmesg... any ideas?
Unfortunately I can't see the top of the errors as there are too many... :-( I'll throw a console on it and start logging. Is anyone else seeing this sort of activity? I'm running the latest stock kernel available using yum from the repos. I'm not using any additional repos(rpmforge, epel, etc...) and I don't have any custom compiled modules. This box is a fresh installation running bind, apache, and mysqld. Tim Nelson Systems/Network Support Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105 - Original Message - From: nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: centos@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 6:19:07 PM GMT -06:00 Guadalajara / Mexico City / Monterrey Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble brewing in dmesg... any ideas? Tim Nelson wrote: There are others with various app names besides vi including httpd, named, sftp-server, etc.. Is this an imminent hardware failure? Do I have kernel issues? I've checked the system with lm_sensors and temps are perfectly normal. Also, performance and operation seems to be fine. Even with these errors, my services are running without any hiccups. HELP! :-) Would need to see the full error but it sounds like a kernel oops. For me at least the useful info would be at the top of the error which wasn't included in your email. Worst case, configure your system with a serial console and capture the error using a terminal emulator on another machine plugged into your serial console. nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Kernel/harware question
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nate Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 7:17 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel/harware question Thomas Dukes wrote: So my question is how can I force it to use the driver from kernel 2.6.9-34.0.2? Is it something I need to add to grub.conf?? If so, what? You could disable kudzu if the driver config you have is what you want. I always disable kudzu on my systems after they are installed as my hardware changes are very rare, I can't remember the last time I used kudzu on a server. chkconfig --level 2345 kudzu off /etc/init.d/kudzu stop for me this happens automatically during kickstart. nate Thanks, Nate, didn't think of that. Still, kind of curious why the newer kernels want to configure a different driver. Eddie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
