Re: [CentOS] webcam program for continuous recording.
On 09/30/2014 04:08 AM, g wrote: On 09/28/2014 05:28 PM, Chris Pemberton wrote: VLC can record the input from /dev/videoX. i did find a link at gofree.com that lead to videolan.org, which lead to rpm.pbone.net, where i found binary rpms for fedora and other os's, but none for centos. so, it looks like if i want vlc for centos, i will have to try compile source. not looking forward to such right now. vlc is in nux dextop repo for C6, works fine ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.10 i386 and x86_64
On 9/30/2014 12:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.11 for i386 and x86_64 Architectures. I gather this hasn't fnished propagating? I tried two mirrors and got 'no updates'. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.10 i386 and x86_64
From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com I gather this hasn't fnished propagating? I tried two mirrors and got 'no updates'. On the mirrors I checked, 5.11 folder was there but the '5' symlink was still pointing to 5.10 I guess they wait to be sure that 5.11 is fully synced? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.10 i386 and x86_64
On 09/30/2014 04:02 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 9/30/2014 12:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.11 for i386 and x86_64 Architectures. I gather this hasn't fnished propagating? I tried two mirrors and got 'no updates'. If you use the default CentOS-Base.repo, which as this: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/x86_64/ or http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/i386/ or a mirror on the default mirrorlist, it should will work: http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5arch=x86_64repo=updates or http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5arch=i386repo=updates Other mirrors may take time to be updated, yes. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Bash package for CentOS5
Hi! I have noticed, that our mirror has this package bash-3.2-33.el5_11.4.x86_64.rpm, but a lot of other mirror still have bash-3.2-33.el5_10.4.x86_64.rpm. Since bash-3.2-33.el5_11.4.x86_64.rpm was issued on 26-Sep-2014 04:28, could this be the product of slower mirror update cycles? Regards, Mitja -- -- Mitja Mihelič ARNES, Tehnološki park 18, p.p. 7, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia tel: +386 1 479 8877, fax: +386 1 479 88 78 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1326 Moderate CentOS 6 php Security Update
Am 30.09.2014 um 12:27 schrieb Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org: CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1326 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1326.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) Just curious - are the SCL advisories also communicated via this channel? (linked to https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-6-rhscl-1-errata.html) Just wondering that upstream did not provide an update for php54 ... -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bash package for CentOS5
On 09/30/2014 06:40 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: Hi! I have noticed, that our mirror has this package bash-3.2-33.el5_11.4.x86_64.rpm, but a lot of other mirror still have bash-3.2-33.el5_10.4.x86_64.rpm. Since bash-3.2-33.el5_11.4.x86_64.rpm was issued on 26-Sep-2014 04:28, could this be the product of slower mirror update cycles? Regards, Mitja Yes ... it will take a few days for every external mirror to update ... this happens when we have to push 30GB to more than 500 mirrors (at a point release time). One of those bash RPMs is in the 5.10 updates directory, the other is in the 5.11 updates directory. Both contain the same source code that is the latest released by Red Hat for EL5 bash right now. There may be another update released for this soon: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-7187 But at the time of this email, there is no update for that CVE. If/when any new update is released, it will be built for 5.11 only. This may also be a good time to reiterate the CentOS update policy. Whenever we release a new Minor Version (in this case, 5.11), there will no longer be any updates released in the older minor version (in this case 5.10). Therefore, you must upgrade to the latest release in a major version (in this case CentOS-5, version 5.11) in order to get any updates moving forward. This has always been the case for all CentOS releases from the beginning .. to get any updates you have to be on the latest version and you should be pointing to only the major version (ie, somepath/5/arch ). 5.11 is only 5.10+updates ... if you stay at 5.10, you will get no more updates, ever. Also .. if people use the default setup, they only have to run 'yum update' to get updates .. it is automatic. If you (or your hosting provider) have modified the default yum configurations ... then you (or your hosting provider) is responsible to figure how to get the updates you want moving forward. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1326 Moderate CentOS 6 php Security Update
On 09/30/2014 07:10 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 30.09.2014 um 12:27 schrieb Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org: CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1326 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1326.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) Just curious - are the SCL advisories also communicated via this channel? (linked to https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-6-rhscl-1-errata.html) Just wondering that upstream did not provide an update for php54 ... -- LF Yes ... but sometimes the 'other channels' are updated later. (Ie, the main os is done first, the the secondary channels or the EUS/AUS, ELS channels. To see all active products, use this link: https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/active/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] webcam program for continuous recording.
On 09/30/2014 01:06 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: On 09/30/2014 04:08 AM, g wrote: On 09/28/2014 05:28 PM, Chris Pemberton wrote: VLC can record the input from /dev/videoX. i did find a link at gofree.com that lead to videolan.org, which lead to rpm.pbone.net, where i found binary rpms for fedora and other os's, but none for centos. so, it looks like if i want vlc for centos, i will have to try compile source. not looking forward to such right now. vlc is in nux dextop repo for C6, works fine i also enabled nux in yumex, but it did not show up. will try again. if it does not show, i will go direct to nux and look for it. thank you for reply. -- peace out. in a world with out fences, who needs gates. tc.hago. g . ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] yum update success+failure
Just doing yum update on two machines (and only two), both centos 5.10, one of them updated something like 22 packages, the other just 4. Packages which were updated on the first, but didn't get updated on the second machine include: gcc, httpd, kernel-2.6.18-398.el5, and probably a couple more. Trying the update on the second machine again (a few times), it always ends, No Packages marked for Update. So now the first has: gcc-4.1.2-55.el5 httpd-2.2.3-91.el5.centos kernel-2.6.18-371.12.1.el5.centos.plus while the second has: gcc-4.1.2-54.el5 httpd-2.2.3-87.el5.centos kernel-2.6.18-371.11.1.el5 WTH??? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] webcam program for continuous recording.
On 09/30/2014 01:06 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: vlc is in nux dextop repo for C6, works fine Yup... that's how I installed it in C7 too. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] gconftool-2 for 7
on 6 the command: gconftool-2 -t bool --list-type bool --set /apps/gnome_settings_daemon/screensaver/start_screensaver false would stop the screen saver. What is it on 7. The above seems to do nothing. Also The gnome-panel process was running in 6 - it does not seem to be run in 7. How do I hide/remove the top and bottom panel? The hide in gconftool-2 for top and bottom done seem to do anything either. What might I be missing? Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] webcam program for continuous recording.
On 09/29/2014 09:53 PM, g wrote: the problem is, VLC steps all over a bunch of patents for various media formats, like mp3, mp4, which are heavily constrained by patents players are supposed to pay royalties, so legitimate US business at least can't distribute working binaries of free opensource implementations. VLC has the option to record video using FLAC and THEORA. https://xiph.org/flac/license.html http://www.theora.org/faq/#14 I suppose you could dig into the RPM and delete any libraries that you don't have licenses for. Or just use an external video camera... Chris ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 7 does not pick up my atheros wireless
Greetings everyone. My recently installed CentOS 7 instance does not enable wireless via Network Manager or otherwise. I have the following output from lspci: lspci |grep AR 08:05.0 Ethernet controller: Qualcomm Atheros AR5212/AR5213 Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01) uname -a Linux imaginationland 3.10.0-123.8.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Sep 22 19:06:58 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux iw --version iw version 3.10 iw -l reports that nl80211 is not found, which is probably the root cause of not having access to the pci device, however, I have no idea why I am unable to access this module. I am unable to get wireless working, however, just prior to uninstalling network manager, I did see it there. I use one of the vms as backup for my personal groupware server which needs to stay active, so I removed network manager, and made sure the configuration for the network and iptables was valid, prior to re-installing network manager. However, after re-installing, Network Manager never sees the wireless device at all. Any assistance would be appreciated. I have not had this type of trouble with linux in quite a few years, and usually if anything I just needed to install the 80211 kernel modules, etc... I am unable to even pull those from repos, on this new install. Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum update success+failure
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, ken wrote: Just doing yum update on two machines (and only two), both centos 5.10, one of them updated something like 22 packages, the other just 4. Packages which were updated on the first, but didn't get updated on the second machine include: gcc, httpd, kernel-2.6.18-398.el5, and probably a couple more. Trying the update on the second machine again (a few times), it always ends, No Packages marked for Update. So now the first has: gcc-4.1.2-55.el5 httpd-2.2.3-91.el5.centos kernel-2.6.18-371.12.1.el5.centos.plus while the second has: gcc-4.1.2-54.el5 httpd-2.2.3-87.el5.centos kernel-2.6.18-371.11.1.el5 WTH??? Looks like the server you were getting the updates from has an incomplete sync, or is in the process of syncing. Do a 'yum clean all, and try again later today. Gilbert *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum update success+failure
On Tue, September 30, 2014 9:07 am, ken wrote: Just doing yum update on two machines (and only two), both centos 5.10, one of them updated something like 22 packages, the other just 4. Packages which were updated on the first, but didn't get updated on the second machine include: gcc, httpd, kernel-2.6.18-398.el5, and probably a couple more. Trying the update on the second machine again (a few times), it always ends, No Packages marked for Update. So now the first has: gcc-4.1.2-55.el5 httpd-2.2.3-91.el5.centos kernel-2.6.18-371.12.1.el5.centos.plus while the second has: gcc-4.1.2-54.el5 httpd-2.2.3-87.el5.centos kernel-2.6.18-371.11.1.el5 WTH??? Quite likely they just hit two different mirrors, one mirror is probably already fully in sync with master, the other is not. As it was already mentioned on this list, with big release (5.11 it is this time) it takes time for all mirrors to synchronize. Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] webcam program for continuous recording.
Am 30.09.2014 um 08:06 schrieb Nicolas Thierry-Mieg nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr: On 09/30/2014 04:08 AM, g wrote: On 09/28/2014 05:28 PM, Chris Pemberton wrote: i did find a link at gofree.com that lead to videolan.org, which lead to rpm.pbone.net, where i found binary rpms for fedora and other os's, but none for centos. so, it looks like if i want vlc for centos, i will have to try compile source. not looking forward to such right now. vlc is in nux dextop repo for C6, works fine atrpms provide it also ... -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bash package for CentOS5
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:15:20AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: There may be another update released for this soon: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-7187 But at the time of this email, there is no update for that CVE. Reading that web page, it says: Red Hat Product Security does not consider this bug to have any security impact on the bash packages shipped in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. A fix for this issue was applied as a hardening in RHSA-2014:1306, RHSA-2014:1311, and RHSA-2014:1312. So... is it fixed or not? Testing with the code on https://shellshocker.net/ for CVE-2014-7187 doesn't indicate that the latest bash update is vulnerable. I'm curious because you're not the first person I've heard say that there are still bash updates in the works from RH/CentOS, when all my research into the published bash CVEs, RHSAs and Bugzilla reports [1] leads me to think there aren't any new RHSAs forthcoming. Am I missing something? 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146804 -- Jonathan Billings billi...@negate.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 does not pick up my atheros wireless
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Martes mailinglistmem...@mgwigglesworth.net wrote: Greetings everyone. My recently installed CentOS 7 instance does not enable wireless via Network Manager or otherwise. I have the following output from lspci: lspci |grep AR 08:05.0 Ethernet controller: Qualcomm Atheros AR5212/AR5213 Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01) I suspect the driver your device uses is one of those removed from CentOS-7. To find out if this is the case, we need to know the device ID pairing. Please show us the output from: lspci -nn | grep -i eth The driver could be ath5k. If so, you are in luck. The centosplus kernel has that driver. But we will see.. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 7 turn off power saving by command line
In CentOS 6 gconftool-2 (command line) is used to enable/disable items. In CentOS 7 I found settings-power- blank screen as something I wish to configure by the command line? How is that accomplished? I brought up gconf-editor and searched for power and blank and found nothing. How can I control this setting from the command line? Thanks Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 turn off power saving by command line
Hi, I think you need dconf for this. HTH -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, 30 September, 2014 17:49:09 Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 7 turn off power saving by command line In CentOS 6 gconftool-2 (command line) is used to enable/disable items. In CentOS 7 I found settings-power- blank screen as something I wish to configure by the command line? How is that accomplished? I brought up gconf-editor and searched for power and blank and found nothing. How can I control this setting from the command line? Thanks Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] webcam program for continuous recording.
I'm emailing G offlist, since once *again* that idiot nixspam is screwing me over g wrote: On 09/30/2014 01:06 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: On 09/30/2014 04:08 AM, g wrote: On 09/28/2014 05:28 PM, Chris Pemberton wrote: VLC can record the input from /dev/videoX. i did find a link at gofree.com that lead to videolan.org, which lead to rpm.pbone.net, where i found binary rpms for fedora and other os's, but none for centos. so, it looks like if i want vlc for centos, i will have to try compile source. not looking forward to such right now. vlc is in nux dextop repo for C6, works fine i also enabled nux in yumex, but it did not show up. will try again. if it does not show, i will go direct to nux and look for it. At work, the std. package motion works quite well (esp. once we bought cards and BNC-connected cameras, instead of really cheap 10-yr-old USB webcams) It uses ffmpeg and non-free to record as mp3, or avi. mark mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] power outage-save / like embedded systems
I would like to setup a small system based on CentOS6 power outage-save as possible. The hardware will be switch off by pulling the plug. To accomplishing this goal, I would mounting some fs parts readonly (e.g. /usr) and thinking about tmpfs for volatile parts (e.g. lock, run under var). Additionally optimize some vm.dirty_* kernel- and fs/ext4 parameters. /persistent would be used with jffs2 on a CF card. So far the theory. Does anyone have some experience with such type of systems? Any pointer to pitfalls are welcome. -- Thanks LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] power outage-save / like embedded systems
Leon Fauster wrote: I would like to setup a small system based on CentOS6 power outage-save as possible. The hardware will be switch off by pulling the plug. To accomplishing this goal, I would mounting some fs parts readonly (e.g. /usr) and thinking about tmpfs for volatile parts (e.g. lock, run under var). Additionally optimize some vm.dirty_* kernel- and fs/ext4 parameters. /persistent would be used with jffs2 on a CF card. So far the theory. Does anyone have some experience with such type of systems? Any pointer to pitfalls are welcome. Put it on a UPS, and install apcupsd. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7
Team, could some help me understand the booting process of CENTOS-7 I need to have constructive material where i could able present a presentation on booting process of CENTOS-7 With Thanks Regards, Keshaba Mahapatra Sr.Technical Consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 turn off power saving by command line
Hi, I think you need dconf for this. .HTH Ok I installed dconf-editor, ran it searched for many things trying to find the blank screen, power or anything and did not find it. Thoughts? Jerry On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote: In CentOS 6 gconftool-2 (command line) is used to enable/disable items. In CentOS 7 I found settings-power- blank screen as something I wish to configure by the command line? How is that accomplished? I brought up gconf-editor and searched for power and blank and found nothing. How can I control this setting from the command line? Thanks Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] power outage-save / like embedded systems
On Tue, September 30, 2014 12:08 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Leon Fauster wrote: I would like to setup a small system based on CentOS6 power outage-save as possible. The hardware will be switch off by pulling the plug. To accomplishing this goal, I would mounting some fs parts readonly (e.g. /usr) and thinking about tmpfs for volatile parts (e.g. lock, run under var). Additionally optimize some vm.dirty_* kernel- and fs/ext4 parameters. /persistent would be used with jffs2 on a CF card. So far the theory. Does anyone have some experience with such type of systems? Any pointer to pitfalls are welcome. Put it on a UPS, and install apcupsd. I would say almost the same: put it behind _APC_ UPS, and install apcupsd. As apcupsd will is designed to talk to APC made UPSes. It may talk nicely to other brands, but I myself do not take chances. And APC is the best in my experience. (Of course, there will be a couple of brands with hardware on the same level...) Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] power outage-save / like embedded systems
On 9/30/2014 10:28 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: And APC is the best in my experience. (Of course, there will be a couple of brands with hardware on the same level...) actually, I'd take an Eaton Powerware (formerly Best Power) over a APC any day. APC BackUPS grade stuff is strictly cheap consumer gear, I've had dozens of them fail over the years, all different BU models, the battery fails, you put a new battery in and the UPS still won't work. They consistently overcharge the batteries so they die in 2-3 years, when they should last 5+. The APC SmartUPS stuff is significantly better, but also a lot more expensive. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] power outage-save / like embedded systems
On Tue, September 30, 2014 12:50 pm, John R Pierce wrote: On 9/30/2014 10:28 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: And APC is the best in my experience. (Of course, there will be a couple of brands with hardware on the same level...) actually, I'd take an Eaton Powerware (formerly Best Power) over a APC any day. Is there anything similar to apcupsd for that (preferably open source)? (I do remember ferrups... ;-) APC BackUPS grade stuff is strictly cheap consumer gear, I've had dozens of them fail over the years, all different BU models, the battery fails, you put a new battery in and the UPS still won't work. They consistently overcharge the batteries so they die in 2-3 years, when they should last 5+. The APC SmartUPS stuff is significantly better, but also a lot more expensive. Indeed, I do stick to SmartUPS ... I should have mentioned it. Thanks, John for weighing in ! Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum update success+failure
On 09/30/2014 12:00 PM Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Tue, September 30, 2014 9:07 am, ken wrote: Just doing yum update on two machines (and only two), both centos 5.10, one of them updated something like 22 packages, the other just 4. Packages which were updated on the first, but didn't get updated on the second machine include: gcc, httpd, kernel-2.6.18-398.el5, and probably a couple more. Trying the update on the second machine again (a few times), it always ends, No Packages marked for Update. So now the first has: gcc-4.1.2-55.el5 httpd-2.2.3-91.el5.centos kernel-2.6.18-371.12.1.el5.centos.plus while the second has: gcc-4.1.2-54.el5 httpd-2.2.3-87.el5.centos kernel-2.6.18-371.11.1.el5 WTH??? Quite likely they just hit two different mirrors, one mirror is probably already fully in sync with master, the other is not. As it was already mentioned on this list, with big release (5.11 it is this time) it takes time for all mirrors to synchronize. Valeri That must have been it. I just tried again and the second machine had 41 packages updated, including those mentioned above. For the record, no other yum commands were required. I just needed to re-run the same old yum update. Thanks to all for the kind counsel, ken ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] power outage-save / like embedded systems
John R Pierce wrote: On 9/30/2014 10:28 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: And APC is the best in my experience. (Of course, there will be a couple of brands with hardware on the same level...) actually, I'd take an Eaton Powerware (formerly Best Power) over a APC any day. APC BackUPS grade stuff is strictly cheap consumer gear, I've had dozens of them fail over the years, all different BU models, the battery fails, you put a new battery in and the UPS still won't work. They consistently overcharge the batteries so they die in 2-3 years, when they should last 5+. The APC SmartUPS stuff is significantly better, but also a lot more expensive. I think I may have an Eaton, or Compupower, at home. I think most of the consumer-grade ones are similar. The SmartUPS are... but then, overwhelmingly, mine are rackmount. I have mentioned here, before, though, that at least with the SmartUPS, you can easily, and far less expensively, buy replacement batteries, but they *MUST* be HR (high rate) batteries; anything else, and the SmartUPS don't believe they've been replaced correctly. Isn't even a price difference - it's just for a different market, and most of the vendors, nor the OEM's reps I've spoken to, know *anything* about this. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] power outage-save / like embedded systems
On 9/30/2014 11:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: Is there anything similar to apcupsd for that (preferably open source)? (I do remember ferrups... they have a whole GUI power management package that runs on linux but I tend to use the more basic shell-only stuff. most of the Eatons I've used have had ethernet, they have a web interface on the UPS to configure, you can list dozens of systems the UPS can lob status updates at, and use it with nut [Network UPS Tools, available from epel] or whatever... nut works with serial port and UPS based UPS's too. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] power outage-save / like embedded systems
On 9/30/2014 11:22 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: The SmartUPS are... but then, overwhelmingly, mine are rackmount. I have mentioned here, before, though, that at least with the SmartUPS, you can easily, and far less expensively, buy replacement batteries, but they *MUST* be HR (high rate) batteries; anything else, and the SmartUPS don't believe they've been replaced correctly. quality VRLA (SLA, AGM) batteries are capable of delivering massive current loads, I've not had any problems using these on good UPSs.At home, i've got an /ancient/ SmartUPS2000 (2KVA) tower unit that I repopulated with Panasonic 12V 20AH 'motorcycle' batteries.its been running great now for nearly 10 years, and STILL can keep my entire home computer load going for 4+ hours in a failure.These batteries are WAY past the 'normal' end of life, but are still doing very strong. I even put a safety light on them, a floor lamp with a 7W LED bulb bounced off the ceiling, thats left always-on, as this room is quite dark. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] UPS question
so I have a bunch of servers at work that are on DUAL UPS's (1 per each of 2 power supplies). Its mostly HP gear, but also some Sun and IBM. Ideally I'd like the system to not go into shutdown unless BOTH UPS's that a particular box is plugged into (there's actually 4 UPS, 2 per each of 2 racks).Has anyone ever configured anything like that with NUT or whatever? Right now, I'm running without any UPS monitoring software, as the whole building is on a generator that comes on 60 seconds after a power failure, so my 7kVA(!) UPS's don't see much use, and also I just installled these new racks and UPS's and haven't really had the time to sit down and figure it all out. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] power outage-save / like embedded systems
John R Pierce wrote: On 9/30/2014 11:22 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: The SmartUPS are... but then, overwhelmingly, mine are rackmount. I have mentioned here, before, though, that at least with the SmartUPS, you can easily, and far less expensively, buy replacement batteries, but they *MUST* be HR (high rate) batteries; anything else, and the SmartUPS don't believe they've been replaced correctly. quality VRLA (SLA, AGM) batteries are capable of delivering massive current loads, I've not had any problems using these on good UPSs.At home, i've got an /ancient/ SmartUPS2000 (2KVA) tower unit that I repopulated with Panasonic 12V 20AH 'motorcycle' batteries.its been running great now for nearly 10 years, and STILL can keep my entire home computer load going for 4+ hours in a failure.These batteries are WAY past the 'normal' end of life, but are still doing very strong. I even put a safety light on them, a floor lamp with a 7W LED bulb bounced off the ceiling, thats left always-on, as this room is quite dark. Right... at home. I'm running mostly SmartUPS 3000s, rack mount, that take eight batteries (which I can buy for about $100), or I could buy a new set, with sled, for way over $300 The HRs should work in anything... but I've got some of the 3000's that peak at over 90% usage (say, 3 64-core servers running flat out with a load over 70), and these batteries allege, at that kind of load, 15 min, maybe 7. With the daily (or twice daily - wonderful line we have here at a huge, major US gov't agency in the DC 'burbs), it's fine, and they don't notice the second or two blips. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UPS question
John R Pierce wrote: so I have a bunch of servers at work that are on DUAL UPS's (1 per each of 2 power supplies). Its mostly HP gear, but also some Sun and IBM. Ideally I'd like the system to not go into shutdown unless BOTH UPS's that a particular box is plugged into (there's actually 4 UPS, 2 per each of 2 racks).Has anyone ever configured anything like that with NUT or whatever? Right now, I'm running without any UPS monitoring software, as the whole building is on a generator that comes on 60 seconds after a power failure, so my 7kVA(!) UPS's don't see much use, and also I just installled these new racks and UPS's and haven't really had the time to sit down and figure it all out. Nope. I'd think to have something that checked both UPSes, and if both of them were showing no line power for over x sec (60? 70?), start a shutdown. Here, as I just mentioned, it's only a second or two, so I have to edit /etc/apcupsd/apccontrol to change SHUTDOWN to SHUTDOWN=/dev/null mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UPS question
On 30/09/14 02:33 PM, John R Pierce wrote: so I have a bunch of servers at work that are on DUAL UPS's (1 per each of 2 power supplies). Its mostly HP gear, but also some Sun and IBM. Ideally I'd like the system to not go into shutdown unless BOTH UPS's that a particular box is plugged into (there's actually 4 UPS, 2 per each of 2 racks).Has anyone ever configured anything like that with NUT or whatever? Right now, I'm running without any UPS monitoring software, as the whole building is on a generator that comes on 60 seconds after a power failure, so my 7kVA(!) UPS's don't see much use, and also I just installled these new racks and UPS's and haven't really had the time to sit down and figure it all out. I do this with APC UPSes and apcupsd. I find it well worth the effort as I have a (separate) program that checks the UPS state every 30 seconds and emails me if there is a notable state change. This has caught multiple power issues coming from the mains. I show how I do this as a sub-section in a larger tutorial, if you are curious; https://alteeve.ca/w/AN!Cluster_Tutorial_2#Setting_Up_UPS_Monitoring I had to make some changes to the apcupsd init.d script to read/use multiple UPS config files. I also disabled the automatic power off features as, by default, it would have triggered a shutdown as soon as one UPS dropped. This is useless if the other UPS is fine, of course. That separate scanner program handles the smarts for deciding when to shut down based on the strongest of the available UPSes... but that's not really covered here. hth -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UPS question
John R Pierce wrote: snip failure, so my 7kVA(!) UPS's don't see much use, and also I just installled these new racks and UPS's and haven't really had the time to Damn, hit send, and forgot to ask: feel free to answer offlist, but what make and model are the 7KVAs, and what ballpark price were they? We need two of something like that (at least 6KVA) for the SGI supercomputer mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] power outage-save / like embedded systems
On Tue, September 30, 2014 1:23 pm, John R Pierce wrote: On 9/30/2014 11:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: Is there anything similar to apcupsd for that (preferably open source)? (I do remember ferrups... they have a whole GUI power management package that runs on linux but I tend to use the more basic shell-only stuff. most of the Eatons I've used have had ethernet, they have a web interface on the UPS to configure, you can list dozens of systems the UPS can lob status updates at, and use it with nut [Network UPS Tools, available from epel] or whatever... nut works with serial port and UPS based UPS's too. I was thinking more in line of what apcupsd does: it runs as a daemon, talks to UPS (and puts wall message about events like power loss...), and executes command to cleanly shut down the box if less than (whatever % of battery juice you configured to start clean shutdown at), and will issue command to cancel shutdown if power returned after shutdown started (sometimes you can do it...). And I usually don't need to do any configuration (using GUI or command line utility) of the UPS itself... so after initial configuration of apcupsd I never get back to it. And, BTW, if you have half of a rack behind one UPS, you can set apcupsd on one machine to talk to UPS, and on other machines set apcupsd to talk to apcupsd on master machine making all of them aware, and act as necessary. Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UPS question
On 9/30/2014 11:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Damn, hit send, and forgot to ask: feel free to answer offlist, but what make and model are the 7KVAs, and what ballpark price were they? We need two of something like that (at least 6KVA) for the SGI supercomputer they are HP R7000, made by Eaton. 4U 7KVA rackmount. they need 208 40A(?) service. ethernet interface is standard. They support up to 4 extended runtime modules (4U each). at 80% usage, HP claims 6 minutes with the base unit and 57 minutes with 4 ERM's (3U each). These things are 165 lbs, they were a gut buster to load into the racks, heh. after the 1st one, I removed the batteries from the other 3, and it was way easier. They use 18 12V 45W UPS batteries, in two packs of 9 each. quick specs, http://www8.hp.com/h20195/v2/GetDocument.aspx?docname=c04155297 I don't remember the price we paid, we bought these last year, but we get a substantial discount on HP gear. google suggests $4500 at distributors. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] power outage-save / like embedded systems
On 9/30/2014 11:52 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: I was thinking more in line of what apcupsd does: it runs as a daemon, talks to UPS (and puts wall message about events like power loss...), and executes command to cleanly shut down the box if less than (whatever % of battery juice you configured to start clean shutdown at), and will issue command to cancel shutdown if power returned after shutdown started (sometimes you can do it...). And I usually don't need to do any configuration (using GUI or command line utility) of the UPS itself... so after initial configuration of apcupsd I never get back to it. And, BTW, if you have half of a rack behind one UPS, you can set apcupsd on one machine to talk to UPS, and on other machines set apcupsd to talk to apcupsd on master machine making all of them aware, and act as necessary. nut and upsmon do exactly this. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UPS question
On Tue, September 30, 2014 1:41 pm, Digimer wrote: On 30/09/14 02:33 PM, John R Pierce wrote: so I have a bunch of servers at work that are on DUAL UPS's (1 per each of 2 power supplies). The only thing that stopped me from doing that was: you can only use each UPS up to a half of its spec'ed current drain. Thinking in line of: having 2 UPSes for rack, how do you distribute power from them to machines which luckily have 2 power supplies each (for redundancy). Having 1 PS wired to one UPS and 2nd PS to second UPS will save you if one of UPSes failed (and does not provide any output AC). But in this case you will need UPS as powerful (current drain wise) as to power the whole rack. So you are paying for reliability by using UPSes of double capacity. Did I not miss anything? I guess I almost did: if you have 4 UPSes for 2 racks you can wire them so that if only one of 4 fails, you will have increase in draw of all UPSes only by 1/3... I decided _we_ are not that rich anyway... Its mostly HP gear, but also some Sun and IBM. Ideally I'd like the system to not go into shutdown unless BOTH UPS's that a particular box is plugged into (there's actually 4 UPS, 2 per each of 2 racks).Has anyone ever configured anything like that with NUT or whatever? Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UPS question
John R Pierce wrote: On 9/30/2014 11:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Damn, hit send, and forgot to ask: feel free to answer offlist, but what make and model are the 7KVAs, and what ballpark price were they? We need two of something like that (at least 6KVA) for the SGI supercomputer they are HP R7000, made by Eaton. 4U 7KVA rackmount. they need 208 40A(?) service. ethernet interface is standard. They support up to 4 extended runtime modules (4U each). at 80% usage, HP claims 6 minutes with the base unit and 57 minutes with 4 ERM's (3U each). Thanks, muchly. I keep hoping to be closer to $3k than $5k (we're a US federal agency, non-DoD, and our budget has been negative for years...). These things are 165 lbs, they were a gut buster to load into the racks, heh. after the 1st one, I removed the batteries from the other 3, and it was way easier. They use 18 12V 45W UPS batteries, in two packs of 9 each. I take the sled out when I mount a SmartUPS 3000 - that's about 43lbs of batteries, and about the same of the unit. For what you've got... I go over to the data center and borrow The Answer: a Blue Genie http://vistamation.com/products/lifts/hand-winch-lift-trucks/ Let me tell you, you need to rack or unrack a blade enclosure, or a RAID box mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk? Local repo? Cache?
On 9/29/2014 1:59 PM, Chris Beattie wrote: How do you all keep a dozen or more Linux boxes updated? I just wanted to say thank you to everyone at once for the advice. It's much appreciated. I also wanted to apologize in advance to those who were injured by the legal text at the end of my previous message (I have no control over it. It is mandatory on all outgoing messages AND the use of personal e-mail accounts is prohibited where I work.), because, well, you're just going to get offended again if you keep reading past the signature block separator. We all know the legalese down there is worse than YouTube comments, which at least have a nonzero chance of being funny going for them. Or, you need to try harder if you want to be as offended as the Cygwin mailing list is at these sorts of things. -- -Chris ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos 6 Software RAID 10 Setup
I am setting up a Centos 6.5 box to host some Openvz containers. I have a 120gb SSD I am going to use for boot, / and swap. Should allow for fast boots. Have a 4TB drive I am going to mount as /backup and use to move container backups too etc. The remaining four 3TB drives I am putting in a software RAID 10 array and mount as /vz and all the containers will go there. It will have by far the most activity. Does this layout look ok? RAID Devices md0 (/dev/md0) 5722917 /vz ext4 Hard Drives sda (/dev/sda) sda1 (/dev/sda1) sda1 500 /boot ext4 sda2 64000 swap sda3 49972 / ext4 sdb (/dev/sdb) sdb1 3815446 /backup ext4 sdc (/dev/sdc) sdc1 2861587 md0 software RAID sdd (/dev/sdc) sdd1 2861587 md0 software RAID sde (/dev/sdc) sdce 2861587 md0 software RAID sdf (/dev/sdc) sdf1 2861587 md0 software RAID ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UPS question
On 30/09/14 03:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Tue, September 30, 2014 1:41 pm, Digimer wrote: On 30/09/14 02:33 PM, John R Pierce wrote: so I have a bunch of servers at work that are on DUAL UPS's (1 per each of 2 power supplies). The only thing that stopped me from doing that was: you can only use each UPS up to a half of its spec'ed current drain. Thinking in line of: having 2 UPSes for rack, how do you distribute power from them to machines which luckily have 2 power supplies each (for redundancy). Having 1 PS wired to one UPS and 2nd PS to second UPS will save you if one of UPSes failed (and does not provide any output AC). But in this case you will need UPS as powerful (current drain wise) as to power the whole rack. So you are paying for reliability by using UPSes of double capacity. Did I not miss anything? I guess I almost did: if you have 4 UPSes for 2 racks you can wire them so that if only one of 4 fails, you will have increase in draw of all UPSes only by 1/3... I decided _we_ are not that rich anyway... In our case, that is what we do. We're an HA shop, first and foremost, so *everything* has to be redundant. So yes, each UPS, on it's own, has to be able to hold up all equipment for the minimum specified runtime. That said, it's not really a waste, because when there is a total poewr out, we get twice the minimum hold-up time, which comes in very handy at times. For example, we had a client who runs Windows VMs on out system. There was a major power out event that we knew was going to outlast the backup power (they're a manufacturing facility, so if the machinery isn't up, then the servers aren't doing much). After we determined that we had to shut everything down, we found that someone had not turned of MS's automatic updates. So one server decided that it was a great time to install updates during a critical outage. Thanks to having the extended runtime, we were able to shed some load and hold up the host node and the server long enough for windows to finish all of it's OS updates. Obviously, this should never have happened in the first place, but it's an example of how extra runtime can come in super helpful. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk? Local repo? Cache?
Chris Beattie wrote: On 9/29/2014 1:59 PM, Chris Beattie wrote: How do you all keep a dozen or more Linux boxes updated? I just wanted to say thank you to everyone at once for the advice. It's much appreciated. I also wanted to apologize in advance to those who were injured by the legal text at the end of my previous message (I have no control over it. It is mandatory on all outgoing messages AND the use of personal e-mail accounts is prohibited where I work.), because, well, you're just going to get offended again if you keep reading past the signature block separator. We all know the legalese down there is worse than YouTube comments, which at least have a nonzero chance of being funny going for them. Or, you need to try harder if you want to be as offended as the Cygwin mailing list is at these sorts of things. I hope you got a chuckle out of my final disclaimer - the quote from my ...late... wife. Let me also note that, as I said, I am not allowed to speak for my agency or my company... which is why I'm on this list using my own business email (as opposed to the personal one, both from the same hosting provider). mark no auto-sig here ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UPS question
On 9/30/2014 12:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: The only thing that stopped me from doing that was: you can only use each UPS up to a half of its spec'ed current drain. same as any other HA solution.active/standby servers, you're only using the compute power of the active server, the standby server is sitting there waiting for a catastrophe.redundant LAN or SAN switches, etc etc. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UPS question
On 9/30/2014 12:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I take the sled out when I mount a SmartUPS 3000 - that's about 43lbs of batteries, and about the same of the unit. For what you've got... I go over to the data center and borrow The Answer: a Blue Genie http://vistamation.com/products/lifts/hand-winch-lift-trucks/ Let me tell you, you need to rack or unrack a blade enclosure, or a RAID box our big DC's probably have those, but they are in other states or countries. the small DC at my office where my lab is located, we get to use brute force and muscle. last big RAID boxes I racked, I pulled all the drives and PSUs out first, and it was easy. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UPS question
On 30/09/14 03:14 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 9/30/2014 12:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: The only thing that stopped me from doing that was: you can only use each UPS up to a half of its spec'ed current drain. same as any other HA solution.active/standby servers, you're only using the compute power of the active server, the standby server is sitting there waiting for a catastrophe.redundant LAN or SAN switches, etc etc. Exactly... HA has to cover the full stack. That said, most of our installs have loads on both nodes (multiple VMs, some on node 1, some on node 2). Like the UPSes though, each node itself has to have sufficient capacity to run everything. :) -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Software RAID 10 Setup
Matt wrote: I am setting up a Centos 6.5 box to host some Openvz containers. I have a 120gb SSD I am going to use for boot, / and swap. Should allow for fast boots. Have a 4TB drive I am going to mount as /backup and use to move container backups too etc. The remaining four 3TB drives I am putting in a software RAID 10 array and mount as /vz and all the containers will go there. It will have by far the most activity. Does this layout look ok? RAID Devices md0 (/dev/md0) 5722917 /vz ext4 Hard Drives sda (/dev/sda) sda1 (/dev/sda1) sda1 500 /boot ext4 snip Make it 1G for /boot. I've actually used preupgrade in fedora, when I brought a couple of workstations from FC17 to FC19, and it *needed* about 300G; I do *not* expect that to go down, and 1G, which we've decided on and have been using at work for several years, should be ok. Oh, and we've just defaulted to 2G swap (and my mind SEGV's when I mention how much RAM some of our servers have) mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk? Local repo? Cache?
On Tue, September 30, 2014 2:10 pm, Chris Beattie wrote: On 9/29/2014 1:59 PM, Chris Beattie wrote: How do you all keep a dozen or more Linux boxes updated? I just wanted to say thank you to everyone at once for the advice. It's much appreciated. I also wanted to apologize in advance to those who were injured by the legal text at the end of my previous message (I have no control over it. It is mandatory on all outgoing messages AND the use of personal e-mail accounts is prohibited where I work.), because, well, you're just going to get offended again if you keep reading past the signature block separator. We all know the legalese down there is worse than YouTube comments, which at least have a nonzero chance of being funny going for them. I'm usually the one who reacts sharply to that [il]legal nonsense in e-mail footers. I usually write my position about it to the best of my English language abilities, so the sender of the message has somebody's else writing about legal nonseseness of it which he/she can pass over to the ones in charge who ordered the footer and hence can revert the decision. And I do my best to indeed reveal the feeling of the person who does read that footer and comprehends what is being said, thus to encourage the sender to indeed pass the message on up the ladder... Cheers ;-) Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk? Local repo? Cache?
On 9/30/2014 3:14 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I hope you got a chuckle out of my final disclaimer - the quote from my ...late... wife. It's a good one. I had to go back and take a second look because I stopped reading at the double dashes, heh heh. I don't know how the footer disappeared (Honestly, I despise them as much as anyone else!), but I figured one more message was worth the risk before I re-lurk. -- -Chris ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7
On 30/09/14 18:24, keshab mahapatra wrote: Team, could some help me understand the booting process of CENTOS-7 I need to have constructive material where i could able present a presentation on booting process of CENTOS-7 With Thanks Regards, Keshaba Mahapatra Sr.Technical Consultant How about I do your presentation for you and you pay me your salary! I mean, seriously - according to your signature you are a Senior Technical Consultant. Surely you can read the technical notes / product manual provided by upstream, or if that does not contain enough in depth material then man pages and google should be able to fill in the blanks for you. At the very least I would expect a Senior Technical Consultant to be able to research such things by himself and not post nonsense questions to a public mailing list. Jeez, and it's only Tuesday :-D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7
On 30/09/14 03:33 PM, Ned Slider wrote: On 30/09/14 18:24, keshab mahapatra wrote: Team, could some help me understand the booting process of CENTOS-7 I need to have constructive material where i could able present a presentation on booting process of CENTOS-7 With Thanks Regards, Keshaba Mahapatra Sr.Technical Consultant How about I do your presentation for you and you pay me your salary! I mean, seriously - according to your signature you are a Senior Technical Consultant. Surely you can read the technical notes / product manual provided by upstream, or if that does not contain enough in depth material then man pages and google should be able to fill in the blanks for you. At the very least I would expect a Senior Technical Consultant to be able to research such things by himself and not post nonsense questions to a public mailing list. Jeez, and it's only Tuesday :-D That was a little rude, don't you think? I agree with your general premises; Keshaba could have started with google and then, perhaps, asked here if s/he got stuck on a particular part. That said though, there was no need for you to come down so hard, either. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7
On 30/09/14 20:39, Digimer wrote: On 30/09/14 03:33 PM, Ned Slider wrote: On 30/09/14 18:24, keshab mahapatra wrote: Team, could some help me understand the booting process of CENTOS-7 I need to have constructive material where i could able present a presentation on booting process of CENTOS-7 With Thanks Regards, Keshaba Mahapatra Sr.Technical Consultant How about I do your presentation for you and you pay me your salary! I mean, seriously - according to your signature you are a Senior Technical Consultant. Surely you can read the technical notes / product manual provided by upstream, or if that does not contain enough in depth material then man pages and google should be able to fill in the blanks for you. At the very least I would expect a Senior Technical Consultant to be able to research such things by himself and not post nonsense questions to a public mailing list. Jeez, and it's only Tuesday :-D That was a little rude, don't you think? A little harsh maybe, but not rude. I didn't swear and I didn't personally insult. I simply called it as I saw it. But I take your point. It was the Senior part of the job title that set me off. IMHO the level of questioning didn't in any way match up with the level of professionalism inferred by the job title. To me it read more like a grad student asking the list to do their latest assignment for them. I agree with your general premises; Keshaba could have started with google and then, perhaps, asked here if s/he got stuck on a particular part. That said though, there was no need for you to come down so hard, either. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7
On Sep 30, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk wrote: On 30/09/14 20:39, Digimer wrote: On 30/09/14 03:33 PM, Ned Slider wrote: On 30/09/14 18:24, keshab mahapatra wrote: Team, could some help me understand the booting process of CENTOS-7 I need to have constructive material where i could able present a presentation on booting process of CENTOS-7 With Thanks Regards, Keshaba Mahapatra Sr.Technical Consultant How about I do your presentation for you and you pay me your salary! I mean, seriously - according to your signature you are a Senior Technical Consultant. Surely you can read the technical notes / product manual provided by upstream, or if that does not contain enough in depth material then man pages and google should be able to fill in the blanks for you. At the very least I would expect a Senior Technical Consultant to be able to research such things by himself and not post nonsense questions to a public mailing list. Jeez, and it's only Tuesday :-D That was a little rude, don't you think? A little harsh maybe, but not rude. I didn't swear and I didn't personally insult. I simply called it as I saw it. But I take your point. It was the Senior part of the job title that set me off. IMHO the level of questioning didn't in any way match up with the level of professionalism inferred by the job title. To me it read more like a grad student asking the list to do their latest assignment for them. Especially since 99% of what they need to know is still valid from the TLDP’s Boot to Bash book. The only difference is that instead of SysV init taking over after the initrd, SystemD takes over, which, while sufficiently different from SysV init, is _well_ documented. -- Gary L. Greene, Jr. Sr. Systems Administrator IT Operations, Minerva Networks, Inc. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7
Ned Slider wrote: On 30/09/14 18:24, keshab mahapatra wrote: Team, First mistake: what makes you think we're your team? This is an open mailing list that we've all subscribed to, and we're all over the world, and in various positions and skillsets. We are not your team. could some help me understand the booting process of CENTOS-7 I need to have constructive material where i could able present a presentation on booting process of CENTOS-7 Keshaba Mahapatra Sr.Technical Consultant How about I do your presentation for you and you pay me your salary! I mean, seriously - according to your signature you are a Senior Technical Consultant. Surely you can read the technical notes / product manual provided by upstream, or if that does not contain enough in depth material then man pages and google should be able to fill in the blanks for you. At the very least I would expect a Senior Technical Consultant to be able to research such things by himself and not post nonsense questions to a public mailing list. Jeez, and it's only Tuesday :-D Right - how *did* he get that title (or did he just make it up)? Long past history: when I started programming, I was hired as a sr. programmer I. A few months later, I asked my buddy, the systems programmer, why sr. and not jr. He told me that they'd gotten rid of all the jr positions a couple years before, because they were eligible to join the union mark consultant to his Exalted Highness...* * My cat, of course? I mean, why else are we, and the Internet, here? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7
On Tue, September 30, 2014 3:25 pm, Gary Greene wrote: On Sep 30, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk wrote: On 30/09/14 20:39, Digimer wrote: On 30/09/14 03:33 PM, Ned Slider wrote: On 30/09/14 18:24, keshab mahapatra wrote: Team, could some help me understand the booting process of CENTOS-7 I need to have constructive material where i could able present a presentation on booting process of CENTOS-7 With Thanks Regards, Keshaba Mahapatra Sr.Technical Consultant How about I do your presentation for you and you pay me your salary! I mean, seriously - according to your signature you are a Senior Technical Consultant. Surely you can read the technical notes / product manual provided by upstream, or if that does not contain enough in depth material then man pages and google should be able to fill in the blanks for you. At the very least I would expect a Senior Technical Consultant to be able to research such things by himself and not post nonsense questions to a public mailing list. Jeez, and it's only Tuesday :-D That was a little rude, don't you think? A little harsh maybe, but not rude. I didn't swear and I didn't personally insult. I simply called it as I saw it. But I take your point. It was the Senior part of the job title that set me off. IMHO the level of questioning didn't in any way match up with the level of professionalism inferred by the job title. To me it read more like a grad student asking the list to do their latest assignment for them. Especially since 99% of what they need to know is still valid from the TLDPâs Boot to Bash book. The only difference is that instead of SysV init taking over after the initrd, SystemD takes over, which, while sufficiently different from SysV init, is _well_ documented. and hated by some (meaning myself, but I don't feel I'm alone... Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 03:43:47PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: First mistake: what makes you think we're your team? This is an open mailing list that we've all subscribed to, and we're all over the world, and in various positions and skillsets. We are not your team. I agree with Mark here (imaginey that); and to add to that I consider this it poor taste, if not outright insulting, to just assume we are on the same team. We're not. I for one will not be part of a team with people that expect others to do their job for them. Right - how *did* he get that title (or did he just make it up)? ^ that. I am not trying to come down on the OP here, this is part of a much larger problem. The problem is one of entitlement and laziness. You can couch this in whatever politically correct (ask me about my thoughts on that some time) phrasing you want, but it all boils down to this. People have forgotten how to do things on their own and expect everyone else to just drop what they're doing so they can work on the problems of others. Well, life's not like that. People damned well need to start doing at least a modicum of research on their own. This problem is becoming more and more prevalent as time goes on; and quite frankly the level of competence in IT and surrounding fields has been going steadily down the toilet for quite some time because of it. And people that defend, to whatever degree, this type of behavior are part of the overall problem. Three is a huge difference between helping others and coddling them; start helping and stop coddling. If _I_ can manage to do my job without having to depend on others I'm pretty sure it's a fair bet others can as well. John -- Much of what looks like rudeness in hacker circles is not intended to give offense. Rather, it's the product of the direct, cut-through-the-bullshit communications style that is natural to people who are more concerned about solving problems than making others feel warm and fuzzy. http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html pgpS9JevM3XBC.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7
On 30/09/14 05:08 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 03:43:47PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: First mistake: what makes you think we're your team? This is an open mailing list that we've all subscribed to, and we're all over the world, and in various positions and skillsets. We are not your team. I agree with Mark here (imaginey that); and to add to that I consider this it poor taste, if not outright insulting, to just assume we are on the same team. We're not. I for one will not be part of a team with people that expect others to do their job for them. I frequently see team as a greeting when, obviously, the poster knows we're not a team. It always struck me as a cultural quirk rather than some assumption that the questioner expects us to behave like we're part of the same actual team. Right - how *did* he get that title (or did he just make it up)? ^ that. I am not trying to come down on the OP here, this is part of a much larger problem. The problem is one of entitlement and laziness. You can couch this in whatever politically correct (ask me about my thoughts on that some time) phrasing you want, but it all boils down to this. People have forgotten how to do things on their own and expect everyone else to just drop what they're doing so they can work on the problems of others. Well, life's not like that. People damned well need to start doing at least a modicum of research on their own. This problem is becoming more and more prevalent as time goes on; and quite frankly the level of competence in IT and surrounding fields has been going steadily down the toilet for quite some time because of it. And people that defend, to whatever degree, this type of behavior are part of the overall problem. Three is a huge difference between helping others and coddling them; start helping and stop coddling. If _I_ can manage to do my job without having to depend on others I'm pretty sure it's a fair bet others can as well. It sounds to me like this is along the same lines as today's elders complaining about how kids these days have no respect. In my little tech community, I see a majority of younger people eager to put in the work needed to learn new technologies. They push at least as hard as I did when I was their age, too. Are there some slackers and freeloaders? Sure. Are they the majority though? No. I think it would be really good if everyone took a step back, took a deep breath, and relaxed. This thread has generated a surprisingly (and to me baffling) amount of negativity. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need to Understand booting process of CENTOS-7
On Tue, September 30, 2014 4:08 pm, John R. Dennison wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 03:43:47PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: First mistake: what makes you think we're your team? This is an open mailing list that we've all subscribed to, and we're all over the world, and in various positions and skillsets. We are not your team. I agree with Mark here (imaginey that); and to add to that I consider this it poor taste, if not outright insulting, to just assume we are on the same team. We're not. I for one will not be part of a team with people that expect others to do their job for them. Right - how *did* he get that title (or did he just make it up)? ^ that. I am not trying to come down on the OP here, this is part of a much larger problem. The problem is one of entitlement and laziness. You can couch this in whatever politically correct (ask me about my thoughts on that some time) phrasing you want, but it all boils down to this. People have forgotten how to do things on their own and expect everyone else to just drop what they're doing so they can work on the problems of others. Well, life's not like that. People damned well need to start doing at least a modicum of research on their own. This problem is becoming more and more prevalent as time goes on; and quite frankly the level of competence in IT and surrounding fields has been going steadily down the toilet for quite some time because of it. And people that defend, to whatever degree, this type of behavior are part of the overall problem. Three is a huge difference between helping others and coddling them; start helping and stop coddling. If _I_ can manage to do my job without having to depend on others I'm pretty sure it's a fair bet others can as well. I'm happy to sign under that, only I feel myself plagiarist here... But indeed I hate these days we start solving any problem by creating [google or any other search engine] search line instead of reading documentation first. I hate the GUI interfaces (latest KDE, GNOME,... and lates Windoze as well ;-) switched from logically organized tree of categories, subcategories,... items. ... Worst of all I hate myself following it all and behaving as above ;-( Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UPS question
On Tue, September 30, 2014 2:13 pm, Digimer wrote: On 30/09/14 03:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Tue, September 30, 2014 1:41 pm, Digimer wrote: On 30/09/14 02:33 PM, John R Pierce wrote: so I have a bunch of servers at work that are on DUAL UPS's (1 per each of 2 power supplies). The only thing that stopped me from doing that was: you can only use each UPS up to a half of its spec'ed current drain. Thinking in line of: having 2 UPSes for rack, how do you distribute power from them to machines which luckily have 2 power supplies each (for redundancy). Having 1 PS wired to one UPS and 2nd PS to second UPS will save you if one of UPSes failed (and does not provide any output AC). But in this case you will need UPS as powerful (current drain wise) as to power the whole rack. So you are paying for reliability by using UPSes of double capacity. Did I not miss anything? I guess I almost did: if you have 4 UPSes for 2 racks you can wire them so that if only one of 4 fails, you will have increase in draw of all UPSes only by 1/3... I decided _we_ are not that rich anyway... In our case, that is what we do. We're an HA shop, first and foremost, so *everything* has to be redundant. So yes, each UPS, on it's own, has to be able to hold up all equipment for the minimum specified runtime. That said, it's not really a waste, because when there is a total poewr out, we get twice the minimum hold-up time, which comes in very handy at times. For example, we had a client who runs Windows VMs on out system. There was a major power out event that we knew was going to outlast the backup power (they're a manufacturing facility, so if the machinery isn't up, then the servers aren't doing much). After we determined that we had to shut everything down, we found that someone had not turned of MS's automatic updates. So one server decided that it was a great time to install updates during a critical outage. Thanks to having the extended runtime, we were able to shed some load and hold up the host node and the server long enough for windows to finish all of it's OS updates. Obviously, this should never have happened in the first place, but it's an example of how extra runtime can come in super helpful. Which asks for one more piece of equipment (hopefully you are not on a high floor...): diesel generator. That kicks in if the power doesn't return after some short outage. (I was almost sure you mention it somewhere closer to the end...) Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UPS question
On 30/09/14 05:28 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Tue, September 30, 2014 2:13 pm, Digimer wrote: On 30/09/14 03:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Tue, September 30, 2014 1:41 pm, Digimer wrote: On 30/09/14 02:33 PM, John R Pierce wrote: so I have a bunch of servers at work that are on DUAL UPS's (1 per each of 2 power supplies). The only thing that stopped me from doing that was: you can only use each UPS up to a half of its spec'ed current drain. Thinking in line of: having 2 UPSes for rack, how do you distribute power from them to machines which luckily have 2 power supplies each (for redundancy). Having 1 PS wired to one UPS and 2nd PS to second UPS will save you if one of UPSes failed (and does not provide any output AC). But in this case you will need UPS as powerful (current drain wise) as to power the whole rack. So you are paying for reliability by using UPSes of double capacity. Did I not miss anything? I guess I almost did: if you have 4 UPSes for 2 racks you can wire them so that if only one of 4 fails, you will have increase in draw of all UPSes only by 1/3... I decided _we_ are not that rich anyway... In our case, that is what we do. We're an HA shop, first and foremost, so *everything* has to be redundant. So yes, each UPS, on it's own, has to be able to hold up all equipment for the minimum specified runtime. That said, it's not really a waste, because when there is a total poewr out, we get twice the minimum hold-up time, which comes in very handy at times. For example, we had a client who runs Windows VMs on out system. There was a major power out event that we knew was going to outlast the backup power (they're a manufacturing facility, so if the machinery isn't up, then the servers aren't doing much). After we determined that we had to shut everything down, we found that someone had not turned of MS's automatic updates. So one server decided that it was a great time to install updates during a critical outage. Thanks to having the extended runtime, we were able to shed some load and hold up the host node and the server long enough for windows to finish all of it's OS updates. Obviously, this should never have happened in the first place, but it's an example of how extra runtime can come in super helpful. Which asks for one more piece of equipment (hopefully you are not on a high floor...): diesel generator. That kicks in if the power doesn't return after some short outage. (I was almost sure you mention it somewhere closer to the end...) Valeri Some of our clients have that, but not all of them. Even the ones that do, though, can have trouble. A different recent client had a major incident in their power distribution room (fire and/or explosion). They had enough fuel for 6~8 hours of operation. They couldn't get more fuel in time and ended up having to shut down their production facility until they could arrange a more long-term solution. You can go to great lengths to protect yourself, but there will always be limits. It's a question of where your paranoia and budgets meet. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 does not pick up my atheros wireless
Greetings everyone. I the output of lspci -nn | grep -i eth is identical to lspci |grep AR which has already been listed. From my understanding, I need ath5k, and I do in fact require centosplus kernel. I have attempted to update to centosplus kernel by doing the following: run vi /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo and add the following to it [centosplus] enabled=1 includepkgs=kernel* However, this only made kernel-plus packages avaialable, and none of which provide nl80211 or ath5k resources. Can some current directions be listed on how I am supposed to get the centosplus kernel? Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth - Original Message - From: Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 12:39:59 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 does not pick up my atheros wireless On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Martes mailinglistmem...@mgwigglesworth.net wrote: Greetings everyone. My recently installed CentOS 7 instance does not enable wireless via Network Manager or otherwise. I have the following output from lspci: lspci |grep AR 08:05.0 Ethernet controller: Qualcomm Atheros AR5212/AR5213 Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01) I suspect the driver your device uses is one of those removed from CentOS-7. To find out if this is the case, we need to know the device ID pairing. Please show us the output from: lspci -nn | grep -i eth The driver could be ath5k. If so, you are in luck. The centosplus kernel has that driver. But we will see.. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Have sound card, but no device?
Hello everyone, I'm stumped on trying to get my sound card to work on my new server. #dmesg |grep snd snd_hda_intel :00:1b.0: enabling device ( - 0002) snd_hda_intel :00:1b.0: PCI INT A - GSI 22 (level, low) - IRQ 22 snd_hda_intel :00:1b.0: irq 71 for MSI/MSI-X snd_hda_intel :00:1b.0: setting latency timer to 64 snd_hda_intel :01:00.1: enabling device ( - 0002) snd_hda_intel :01:00.1: PCI INT B - GSI 36 (level, low) - IRQ 36 snd_hda_intel :01:00.1: setting latency timer to 64 I have an onboard Intel sound card, and I think I actually have two, looking in /proc/asound: card0 cardshwdepNVidia PCH seq version card1 devices modules oss pcm timers I am not getting any sound from either of them. I installed alsamixer to control the sound levels, but despite all having the volume up, I can't hear anything. However, that is not the problem; I only offer that to say this... I am trying to run an audio server using Icecast and Darkice, but no device can be found. In the past, it has shown up as a device: /dev/dsp1. Using a default option offers no help. It doesn't work. There is no /dev/dsp1, like there is on my other machines. OK, so off to the configuration panel on Gnome I go. System-Preferences-Sound. And, it hangs with a waiting for sound system to respond message. I have Google-foo'd everything: no, I don't have Pulseaudio, as that messes up Icecast and Darkice. I have never had this issue before on any server. Does anyone have any ideas, or a webpage/wiki you could point me at that I might have missed? I want my /dev/dsp1 back. :-) Gilbert *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 does not pick up my atheros wireless
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:13:34 -0400 (EDT) Martes wrote: Can some current directions be listed on how I am supposed to get the centosplus kernel? http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus I also see exclude= directives on that webpage that you didn't mention in your message. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UPS question
On 30/09/14 06:15 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 9/30/2014 2:31 PM, Digimer wrote: You can go to great lengths to protect yourself, but there will always be limits. It's a question of where your paranoia and budgets meet. indeed. and with added levels of complexity come more avenues of failure. Absolutely true. An HA platform is not beautiful when there is nothing left to add. It is beautiful when there is nothing left to take away. The minimum complexity needed to have no single points of failure is inherently high. Doing everything possible to minimize that complexity is a worthy goal. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 does not pick up my atheros wireless
Greetings everyone. I just had to remove the base kernel, and install kernel-plus, then restart. i.e. yum -y remove kernel* yum -y install kernel-plus* I now see the wireless-n card in ifconfig -a : wlp8s5: flags=4098BROADCAST,MULTICAST mtu 1500 ether 00:1b:2f:37:02:46 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 Thanks again. Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth - Original Message - From: Martes mailinglistmem...@mgwigglesworth.net To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 6:13:34 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 does not pick up my atheros wireless Greetings everyone. I the output of lspci -nn | grep -i eth is identical to lspci |grep AR which has already been listed. From my understanding, I need ath5k, and I do in fact require centosplus kernel. I have attempted to update to centosplus kernel by doing the following: run vi /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo and add the following to it [centosplus] enabled=1 includepkgs=kernel* However, this only made kernel-plus packages avaialable, and none of which provide nl80211 or ath5k resources. Can some current directions be listed on how I am supposed to get the centosplus kernel? Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth - Original Message - From: Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 12:39:59 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 does not pick up my atheros wireless On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Martes mailinglistmem...@mgwigglesworth.net wrote: Greetings everyone. My recently installed CentOS 7 instance does not enable wireless via Network Manager or otherwise. I have the following output from lspci: lspci |grep AR 08:05.0 Ethernet controller: Qualcomm Atheros AR5212/AR5213 Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01) I suspect the driver your device uses is one of those removed from CentOS-7. To find out if this is the case, we need to know the device ID pairing. Please show us the output from: lspci -nn | grep -i eth The driver could be ath5k. If so, you are in luck. The centosplus kernel has that driver. But we will see.. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] power outage-save / like embedded systems
Am 30.09.2014 um 19:08 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: Leon Fauster wrote: I would like to setup a small system based on CentOS6 power outage-save as possible. The hardware will be switch off by pulling the plug. To accomplishing this goal, I would mounting some fs parts readonly (e.g. /usr) and thinking about tmpfs for volatile parts (e.g. lock, run under var). Additionally optimize some vm.dirty_* kernel- and fs/ext4 parameters. /persistent would be used with jffs2 on a CF card. So far the theory. Does anyone have some experience with such type of systems? Any pointer to pitfalls are welcome. Put it on a UPS, and install apcupsd. Sure, for servers but I am talking about a small 9W-power-consumption appliance that have this requirement :-) -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 does not pick up my atheros wireless
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Martes mailinglistmem...@mgwigglesworth.net wrote: Greetings everyone. I just had to remove the base kernel, and install kernel-plus, then restart. i.e. yum -y remove kernel* yum -y install kernel-plus* I now see the wireless-n card in ifconfig -a : wlp8s5: flags=4098BROADCAST,MULTICAST mtu 1500 ether 00:1b:2f:37:02:46 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 You do not have to uninstall kernel. The distro kernel and kernel-plus can coexist on the system. But if you want to keep using kernel-plus, edit the /etc/sysconfig/kernel file to make it the default: DEFAULTKERNEL=kernel-plus Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] power outage-save / like embedded systems
On 9/30/2014 3:42 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 30.09.2014 um 19:08 schriebm.r...@5-cent.us: Leon Fauster wrote: I would like to setup a small system based on CentOS6 power outage-save as possible. The hardware will be switch off by pulling the plug. To accomplishing this goal, I would mounting some fs parts readonly (e.g. /usr) and thinking about tmpfs for volatile parts (e.g. lock, run under var). Additionally optimize some vm.dirty_* kernel- and fs/ext4 parameters. /persistent would be used with jffs2 on a CF card. So far the theory. Does anyone have some experience with such type of systems? Any pointer to pitfalls are welcome. Put it on a UPS, and install apcupsd. Sure, for servers but I am talking about a small 9W-power-consumption appliance that have this requirement:-) I don't think CentOS is the appropriate distribution for that sort of system. Does it even have jffs2 support? a uClinux/busybox based system would be much more appropriate. maybe start with DSL, http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/ or tinycore, http://tinycorelinux.net/ -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 does not pick up my atheros wireless
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Martes mailinglistmem...@mgwigglesworth.net wrote: Greetings everyone. I the output of lspci -nn | grep -i eth is identical to lspci |grep AR which has already been listed. Now that you've got things going, this is a mute point but I just wanted to make one point clear for future searchers. Your output: lspci |grep AR 08:05.0 Ethernet controller: Qualcomm Atheros AR5212/AR5213 Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01) is not the same as what I asked for. Look very closely. 'lspci -nn' displays the device IDs in the output, for example [8086:107c]. This information is important and can be used to identify the driver that supports the device. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Is it safe to go from CentOS6.5 to CentOS 7 at this time
On 29-09-2014 12:46, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I feel that I'd stay with 6.x unless there's a must-have feature. Right now, I'm playing with stuff on those servers - for one, NetworkMangler is *extremely* noisy, and trying to find *full* examples of its configuration file... I've only found *tiny* bits and pieces. I think I got it to log only errors, but the startup was *noisy*, and the documentation leaves something to be desired. Please do share more on what you're missing in the docs. It's always evolving, we can make it better at anytime. It's hard to understand what you mean with a full example because we can have quite a bunch of layout setups, it's hard to make a 1-fits-all in there. Oh, and it enables wireless. On a server. With no wifi. And I don't see any ifcfg-'s to set them to *off*. Tried nmcli d disconnect interface ? Marcelo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-docs] request for wiki access
Hi, my name is Jason Brooks (uname jasonbrooks). My contributions will be around the Atomic SIG. The atomic wiki page is at: http://wiki.centos.org/Atomic Regards, Jason --- Jason Brooks Red Hat Open Source and Standards @jasonbrooks | @redhatopen http://community.redhat.com ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] Syntax for ACLs?
Hey all, Is there better documentation on setting up ACLs for the wiki than what's here? (http://wiki.centos.org/SyntaxReference?action=showredirect=centoswiki%2FSyntaxReference) Thanks, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud Storage Analyst j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Syntax for ACLs?
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote: Hey all, Is there better documentation on setting up ACLs for the wiki than what's here? (http://wiki.centos.org/SyntaxReference?action=showredirect=centoswiki%2FSyntaxReference) Maybe this one? http://moinmo.in/HelpOnAccessControlLists But range is the wikimaster, so he knows best. :) Akemi ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Syntax for ACLs?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/30/2014 09:45 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Hey all, Is there better documentation on setting up ACLs for the wiki than what's here? (http://wiki.centos.org/SyntaxReference?action=showredirect=centoswiki%2FSyntaxReference) FWIW, I've been not using ACLs, meaning I think I've left any page I write as open for all writers/editors (which is fine with me, I prefer a flat ACL structure for 99% of wiki content.) Also, I don't think I have permissions to set ACLs in all cases, where I've tried I've been bounced. - - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade.^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org\ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlQrEc8ACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEEgdwCgtoHKcyudn+9TvzvLKBdp4Ps3 wbkAn3nHVIwtT753bEa/A9TopNwiobhC =rFkI -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Syntax for ACLs?
On 09/30/2014 03:25 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: I've been not using ACLs, meaning I think I've left any page I write as open for all writers/editors (which is fine with me, I prefer a flat ACL structure for 99% of wiki content.) Also, I don't think I have permissions to set ACLs in all cases, where I've tried I've been bounced. Interesting. I thought I detected a strong preference towards having ACLs in place. I'm perfectly fine having a flat structure for anyone w/wiki permissions. Any objections, folks? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud Storage Analyst j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Syntax for ACLs?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30/09/14 22:25, Karsten Wade wrote: On 09/30/2014 09:45 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Hey all, Is there better documentation on setting up ACLs for the wiki than what's here? (http://wiki.centos.org/SyntaxReference?action=showredirect=centoswiki%2FSyntaxReference) FWIW, I've been not using ACLs, meaning I think I've left any page I write as open for all writers/editors (which is fine with me, I prefer a flat ACL structure for 99% of wiki content.) Also, I don't think I have permissions to set ACLs in all cases, where I've tried I've been bounced. - Karsten Well, even if you think that you were not using ACLs, there are default ACLs in place all over the wiki. The moin instance/version used at the moment even had a specific patch to allow hierarchical ACL (http://moinmo.in/MoinMoinPatch/HierarchicalACL) :-) - -- Fabian Arrotin gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlQrj9YACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6wUwCfXVKK3kX2DKe0b7CPcdQWhXz9 eoIAn00PwNTJXnGQfTy+SyypLfpf+y5E =kRHz -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.10 i386 and x86_64
We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.11 for
i386 and x86_64 Architectures.
CentOS-5.11 is based on source code released by Red Hat, Inc. and
includes packages from all variants including Server and Client. All
upstream repositories have been combined into one, to make it easier
for end users to work with.
This is just an announcement email, not the release notes. The Release
Notes for CentOS-5.11 can be found on-line at :
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.11 and everyone is
encouraged to look through them once. Also worth browsing through are
the CentOS FAQs at http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ
+++
Upgrading from CentOS-5.10 ( or any older CentOS-5 release ):
If you are already running CentOS-5.10 or an older CentOS-5 release, all
you need to do is update your machine via yum by running :
'yum update'
Running 'yum list updates' before doing the update is recommended, so
you can get a list of packages that are going to be updated. To check
you are indeed on CentOS-5.11, run : 'rpm -q centos-release' and that
should return: 'centos-release-5-11.el5.centos'
+++
Downloading CentOS-5.11 for new installs:
- -- Via direct download:
Due to bandwidth considerations the CentOS Project does not publish ISOs
directly from our network machines. However direct downloads are
available from external mirrors over http, ftp, and rsync. A geoip
based list is available at http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/
to give you the best predictable match (and only lists mirrors that are
updated already, so you don't need to waste time looking for a sync'd
mirror.)
NOTE: The bash version included on the CentOS-5.11 ISOs is a version
that contains the shellshock vulnerability. When we create CentOS Linux
ISOs, we try to mirror the same package versions that are on the
upstream ISOs from Red Hat, whose ISOs also contain that vulnerability.
An updated bash is available as a zero day update in the 5.11 updates
repo now. Please run 'yum update bash' after install. There is also
an Important nss security update that must be installed after using
this ISO set.
+++
sha1sum for these ISOS:
sha1sum i386:
1b590daa61ba5aeadf1d2b083bf9acf3abdc249c CentOS-5.11-i386-bin-1of8.iso
23fd9e729127c75353ab35ebc49cb44544bfa45f CentOS-5.11-i386-bin-2of8.iso
3dab434921d945d37cee185df6aad379afafbc82 CentOS-5.11-i386-bin-3of8.iso
f9a5f89582e16918ea790ca7ab36f335cb43653b CentOS-5.11-i386-bin-4of8.iso
a11cabe288807a45a806b5023b4ccdbde526079a CentOS-5.11-i386-bin-5of8.iso
dd44ec9454f965f9e7e1be416eddea20dbcb7bc9 CentOS-5.11-i386-bin-6of8.iso
ed1a651b783875535585541312e848094fa0d544 CentOS-5.11-i386-bin-7of8.iso
24d0bfba433f1b3965fe8fb8f0a5d790aae1907d CentOS-5.11-i386-bin-8of8.iso
ec3a89b4edc8e391d13c1ecce4e6ce3917719e39 CentOS-5.11-i386-bin-DVD-1of2.iso
5143065f9a2ee99066dd80a31f9ff035516fc0f6 CentOS-5.11-i386-bin-DVD-2of2.iso
e6a89ee7377c28f682fd85e02cd499eb284b3aa6 CentOS-5.11-i386-netinstall.iso
sha1sum x86_64:
a7f8bbf4841d867562f9205b39f960f0cf97bfb1 CentOS-5.11-x86_64-bin-1of9.iso
61bed1d0739622000ded9e790668982b7b523b23 CentOS-5.11-x86_64-bin-2of9.iso
90c182486aa6890c657d19a7bc287d041490cf4b CentOS-5.11-x86_64-bin-3of9.iso
36b12acc63aecd27a6a03174f00339354419fa5d CentOS-5.11-x86_64-bin-4of9.iso
79239056fdf0ca7dc9f482b298eeb7930c05d083 CentOS-5.11-x86_64-bin-5of9.iso
dd629f29652fcdba80d2c2a67d29a533e578937f CentOS-5.11-x86_64-bin-6of9.iso
2549fff17680ce4b0b0c6f562757afa685cef1a5 CentOS-5.11-x86_64-bin-7of9.iso
ae3c41e2a08fa03f76d48c2115a5062f1571eca8 CentOS-5.11-x86_64-bin-8of9.iso
fd91a47ee69a1e03cf622a3697039b42d9472e42 CentOS-5.11-x86_64-bin-9of9.iso
ebd77f2fdfac8da04f31c508905cf52aa62937cc CentOS-5.11-x86_64-bin-DVD-1of2.iso
71ff7ee8460798e6b361b44a68a222bd9c9b3a2c CentOS-5.11-x86_64-bin-DVD-2of2.iso
91db10bb9808818f6fbf20196fbab4c0c9da19d3 CentOS-5.11-x86_64-netinstall.iso
+++
Getting Help:
The best place to start when looking for help with CentOS Linux is at the wiki
( http://wiki.centos.org/GettingHelp ), which lists various options and
communities who might be able to help. If you think there is a bug in
the system, do report it at http://bugs.centos.org/ - but keep in mind
that the bugs system is *not* a support mechanism, it is instead a place
where the CentOS community provides help to and for each other.
Some Friendly URLs :
http://www.centos.org/
http://wiki.centos.org/
http://lists.centos.org/
http://bugs.centos.org/
irc://#cen...@irc.freenode.net
+++
A big thanks to everyone who contributed towards this release, including
the translation teams, the qa team, the artwork team, the CentOS
Developers and all the users out there.
Enjoy!
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1326 Moderate CentOS 6 php Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1326 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1326.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 713dbbfa6b5bbe8b9dc74de079be9065e8cd1d9d0b1e0c2acc2853a7eb591a7b php-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 57ba7ec461118843b13b7eaa2beb7c57aca6df585e878fdf12dc343866ba9937 php-bcmath-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 2414f27b8046fb346886cfd30566c4981745e89cb72a39306f6808091fbcacc3 php-cli-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm d0ad266649cd99628a2d95c86885051929607d555b3cafd5c5e5ba94c7b5145d php-common-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm c3768b779cc9e1ad07663dbd825048d2f09d6bd79b07dab24e80244edf81cc72 php-dba-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm cd2fad485913d23c19dd21bc30ba51c40b26f0a6c9de644d2e51760378851fce php-devel-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm e74ecff5c64426af2f9e3a4721cc958fc5dc66d6decc547f7ed7327d582681b7 php-embedded-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 8e03f4c5d8cf176dfbc356b438e133ae30c4d33dc17ddbfb7fe22cf28b0ceab6 php-enchant-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 362872216900e81b82fbad59af8baed66b3a72e68eb2e57021a62c830ea3fdef php-fpm-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm b5ef0dedb8caf9a4db993fc1608e6c0275cc24cea2e1d027307a74a50e82e15c php-gd-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 7b66ff88e0b538b94144f142796177126d5834083f4cba788c2c60c1ce942066 php-imap-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm d4d092ab6b102f49a674390753f00a33fadda3a4d396e08b68a3480ff6ed29d2 php-intl-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 01eedeede1f01762dae6d8352c300a4afa01d7bb33c1bb3a44e1f2d43145fb5a php-ldap-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 2e46ab896b7963a347a232ba216a0d240611d6f59f547369feadbe739ba9ea59 php-mbstring-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 16e387330933a9e2ce9a26bb32945027507083cfebe84567a5bdfb67c7095fb9 php-mysql-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 64e15f1d9549891468e4e156ec5d3e1db614fea89e63397579a63ee8880f3629 php-odbc-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm a5f70722c195ea616d6161dcd9f9d12972cde728be10e96d08275eeda1c279f9 php-pdo-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 816988922f309e8b7bf29d5f60bade1791dca392a8a7f3fdb0e683a1310428a5 php-pgsql-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 4a3c6ab0ddc9a3f3c607390806468db392030ad2ae78e0b9b13a75a8e1d97181 php-process-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 903ba4c0e98b5697d8946b52aacdb6cb2dc8e9b84fbc640a33c9457ca1f51f2a php-pspell-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 7e453c5ae65b45fc065a624f243f84634e8ce40aabda7f23c1ea18142a1f5e41 php-recode-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 2673f87938c48bb366a0b4d03514d44338c4359b7c6b794401451eceaccbdb0f php-snmp-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm ce1292c8df00b7ded84c2e419611ef1fbe970fc7297e6ba857a90387a1511904 php-soap-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm beb9450c84f40927248e65f1e14dd79804ce164115485c60301c1f0825d26861 php-tidy-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 95b4346faf26f4642249e9829bcc50d3aff95c200ffe6a6cb4156e867c297894 php-xml-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 631e54caf345750875e3a5e3c5d9692a7cc3107247b50891158e0c8914331da6 php-xmlrpc-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm 75c15e2ee2b52db6f8db61b4b51b95e9defb9d4ad7a2c73731adcdf0b1c3c492 php-zts-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.i686.rpm x86_64: ad4eae0e73a342f618df4e463a9f4f9c10ca2357ac7be18ad49439c26bc344dc php-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm a265592394fa5afd9678a3c8fd5ba0578d28ac7caad5081a7e41fe95c9ad7422 php-bcmath-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm 1f98bf6e9b6956084c3b587970b01bfa4cdf14e875de5788b65225c12e63828c php-cli-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm 384351435d82eed0c1f409db65142518b862c18b4b7cc05761daea55a0e535b5 php-common-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm 650430970bbd1f0ac86deb4684beef4b6b9cba9cb5493e85c676e3248204983a php-dba-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm 7d826ba8cf998d73be73a1f6cc7f387968f1599a5cd636c1816349a0c5e6f0ad php-devel-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm cf171144d03e0c83ec7fb3c1506d1fd226279dbbc46402f5a3a80611535ba240 php-embedded-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm 713fed9071d2365f90f00ce2bca0af0aedd0de25107ecdf17503be9ab8c8afd1 php-enchant-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm e5c4c3cacccb33985408f1943fe50d0a5378a835dfd94bbd5fcdc1ff19571946 php-fpm-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm a893330eb16b42b33a29afe931179bc973b901d0771e54557af49812ccdac044 php-gd-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm a5814f0eb5c302fffce62bc309c90cc68f326eb20927d94d884790c494bc9ae8 php-imap-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm 13a908d8c83d4ea55b885a561c96db52fed0e5e1f8f5a751b0b8e1541128b10b php-intl-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm 983bdbaed0dd8a5298204d5ac901434bda3f97419d8985bd3ee0e33eb7abd722 php-ldap-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm 51ef5a5efebf37aa3cba51817a1ab74519602e57f0ba994973e6db57783b8544 php-mbstring-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm 472c0efa9c0907f682f5b50b28df03f6d7e13119c9972deeb5454e79c4b40d59 php-mysql-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm 7d6a9222ddd5350a8b380d7a388683dd927913d71d8ddc26ff2ef6a928453119 php-odbc-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm 677480c14adc7c9f620011ddac09865b1e9009f14c89a6421fae71fe6445a4f1 php-pdo-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm 889b4ac2e6cf5498bc5434f442e3846a7b694cba1096e868a794a37542492bcc php-pgsql-5.3.3-27.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm a227c6e19fa244085c4a4f2999b821686640ec8ddc2f51175182b2508181d7fa
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1327 Moderate CentOS 7 php Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1327 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1327.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
20bb1ab3a91c4427131c45a1320a509c50f714ee01710164164fab0dc6807356
php-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
5c4479abacd7ab96d5c11b5749c7667228b58221229bfd03008764567b3aba96
php-bcmath-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
cec2f1e39c6b4e1edd1d20acaf9087446f4f6efd924a8e133011c6f986942319
php-cli-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
2c9c8dafecec5162b8eff01adc3a0b3c877a3e569c4fa19be5083ba9dd962b24
php-common-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
037aae7665c0d6420cf197f7567757787d2754c8ebd0821f2043da627379c9fb
php-dba-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
224b91d960bf71d3e986c02a05b3d9418feb652b52e8abebf68ab450d75b980f
php-devel-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
fb406280bfccc2288fb4c6f6395480ee052518d0e8e2547867d2d09e8aed6278
php-embedded-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
07241fe4c88533fa5a054b5307995cb7ac9e63c751b4a3618afd1b3d06f6
php-enchant-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
e658dcd3767cb7ce47c517bb69b03b90ff55f330ea79225a10745a2fdd55de4b
php-fpm-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
29954e0b179a18695d7383fd29650d8d82aa268cdfc8d80b6979d3c5b7c9d463
php-gd-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
3293aca9accd9e6a9dd83131c6b2cab9b7c297c2e304e8d8a580220e220e5161
php-intl-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
febb70ba5e596a99c8a8de0bdf4156c3221db7970f61ee7cae5ee2486cf054e7
php-ldap-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
0fe4201d5f094ac0d7c0c6d61ab8fb2985b797e6974f9928a53aa8454a048173
php-mbstring-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
4ffdd581892a57f20983bca9218f4122023b048d8962308cda37a28efbecf908
php-mysql-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
9ef634b443cced1cfbd7f2fdf358740bf7fea984063a954eac671f407d1a222f
php-mysqlnd-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
3918e00afc23d9b004445e3600d50e4ba4740d0cd8bd5564df428a457a545680
php-odbc-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
4d322004799393292e288edc0ee41454cc18665531a1d0975d5cd11c7d1ed163
php-pdo-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
c204d19e2f44070ec2b456399d7de1d4671ae1bd9df9c5c217c13d1ff515dcb2
php-pgsql-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
1e400df3965e99b4aab8a6d836d2a5b6f8c91a73985812eccdea750372a5787e
php-process-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
78a1627797d8e8c7d38b8bf2838f0fee3bf5a8e4c9499f3c3fc6eedcd0c9ff6b
php-pspell-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
78b45dd66da424532044dd32bc321a4f297fe723ff72fea30d742978bb593408
php-recode-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
a16bdf1823597677ba8771aee8f27d4c00641a2558def09393f85ec4526a8a59
php-snmp-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
25fde10f89e7c43be52632188301ebd0f858b499fb29663acdfdde3bebf63a82
php-soap-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
30933f90bf2f808e016246d5af5d5c5f33db367ec047f98a32553c10801f0120
php-xml-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
66359d589cf83099bd0d12d22822fb3a8afcb3dc4e9f38707836ee99a9e8b29f
php-xmlrpc-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
b5ae24f3db8494510975abd5511596e89603f7c7d31027217b2f15459e11367c
php-5.4.16-23.el7_0.1.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1319 Moderate CentOS 7 xerces-j2 Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1319 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1319.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
505cdc5b9ec209c00923a4ce86738f063ff7a94a3b1a0a5ff682c36b45adb073
xerces-j2-2.11.0-17.el7_0.noarch.rpm
bb05caaa1407ef3a20d4d1224de4e6650872ae775bc119559ef35dfe549aa42c
xerces-j2-demo-2.11.0-17.el7_0.noarch.rpm
c3c04d81040aeec72ee0bcd8155cd3a9d81608fbf157233af91c6a3b6263d2df
xerces-j2-javadoc-2.11.0-17.el7_0.noarch.rpm
Source:
8efbdd997215b7bef73be6113b016ff39c081985e846cbdd8c64d442fe605b84
xerces-j2-2.11.0-17.el7_0.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1240 CentOS 5 autofs BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1240
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1240.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
f02b5b33d83fb0d0f7ab28401d9408bf076d1110043fc86d5d2fd8086dd2
autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.184.el5.i386.rpm
x86_64:
24d3e2ff004d0eacecad2c8ee76247fe2518efc3c31574ffb61c6e44eb3440a3
autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.184.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
fdc6d5c49e50505acd2b1775dd95ffbd23ac8017b9d107ec659057f4fe8e4390
autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.184.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1243 Low CentOS 5 automake Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1243 Low
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1243.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
fb2809095ba51679357193baecb282c9b1dfb9f254a0454095d37c0da5d6347d
automake-1.9.6-3.el5.noarch.rpm
x86_64:
fb2809095ba51679357193baecb282c9b1dfb9f254a0454095d37c0da5d6347d
automake-1.9.6-3.el5.noarch.rpm
Source:
e040fd65671d08482ea52e88ea7729307e5f8abd2748a116e32c2f5df29b83cf
automake-1.9.6-3.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1244 Moderate CentOS 5 bind97 Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1244 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1244.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
5c0a1b04b919b0005246742918aa817cd780dff31df90e3bcdad7edb33f21232
bind97-9.7.0-21.P2.el5.i386.rpm
b5061fb11a9ca469e861aa701fabd3c0273690f7fdf0d17022cb2b9512d4c85f
bind97-chroot-9.7.0-21.P2.el5.i386.rpm
78f63d4055c35650a8324e042ffa2a939148f050be4a347043bac607cce59f8e
bind97-devel-9.7.0-21.P2.el5.i386.rpm
e36c136f1f40f2f311bac849b2753737345dae9239e050e0bdecbc73e1d7694f
bind97-libs-9.7.0-21.P2.el5.i386.rpm
c08f6cd1e80fa057f312adbd5d42e9ca3af519296ff00c75ae766f1304c806d3
bind97-utils-9.7.0-21.P2.el5.i386.rpm
x86_64:
d8bb02fc17da012165942ae9c27616f0a9e97e0d20d0494fbf48780687c3d3b8
bind97-9.7.0-21.P2.el5.x86_64.rpm
447ed1fc8c6eaaf20ac3b6c7525d2f26143bb0df9fe373bb38d43fab26b4518d
bind97-chroot-9.7.0-21.P2.el5.x86_64.rpm
78f63d4055c35650a8324e042ffa2a939148f050be4a347043bac607cce59f8e
bind97-devel-9.7.0-21.P2.el5.i386.rpm
e0816eb1611efffd0c2cf912b421227a107eae682f6e27eb656dcfe0da1359d2
bind97-devel-9.7.0-21.P2.el5.x86_64.rpm
e36c136f1f40f2f311bac849b2753737345dae9239e050e0bdecbc73e1d7694f
bind97-libs-9.7.0-21.P2.el5.i386.rpm
b20a4bac14e073cb3ade32a3e5389ed75ffcd4dbda06e920e9bf747ab64bb914
bind97-libs-9.7.0-21.P2.el5.x86_64.rpm
044483210b6e7dadccdc5fe7225bf37fbff1c753885f147dc85cf300d8d274e1
bind97-utils-9.7.0-21.P2.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
f505cf8795d0fce3df0f2399d94cab13ea602f40ec11868d6447904c718d9294
bind97-9.7.0-21.P2.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1216 CentOS 5 clustermon BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1216
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1216.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
ead3d2f4b41a9e3c46e563a17be4df3c6d061178f5ceebd9ddf5b81173bef0d8
cluster-cim-0.12.1-11.el5.centos.i386.rpm
ae59309c7152f3076a618260bb32745666ba480e681c087cad8813278e2740bf
cluster-snmp-0.12.1-11.el5.centos.i386.rpm
0448a3365d641894a43d29a1e06547cf0f0ca709685ff4cb4e591cbf5811e8a8
modcluster-0.12.1-11.el5.centos.i386.rpm
x86_64:
7bfc6cd476085f09d1c17fc14956c6af00a2c90f11d479689985c289e549ffbf
cluster-cim-0.12.1-11.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
8590e82d1f02c4ebaacfe0efd490ca37641d865063cd983fdc34a894df0c9b65
cluster-snmp-0.12.1-11.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
85a4c200c6bdc5a2ae7518c8c5d47dc653691748f0c24c7447aff46665dfa2cc
modcluster-0.12.1-11.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
c73b14b2d9e14760d167c8f853ff67f66f9c107fb8f468a16526fd897673cfd6
clustermon-0.12.1-11.el5.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1211 CentOS 5 cman BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1211
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1211.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
4d2b843bc3598b77372fb531af743f432af72b2dfeda551b300f432517ef96c9
cman-2.0.115-124.el5.i386.rpm
4c994f2c711e758342fa59b8de27552bbea7156fe564c2e40bd3c81affca4c24
cman-devel-2.0.115-124.el5.i386.rpm
x86_64:
631f9649bd94e108486a44da8c43f0afa95fb9d9859c2ddbc1e719cc4f5f7496
cman-2.0.115-124.el5.x86_64.rpm
4c994f2c711e758342fa59b8de27552bbea7156fe564c2e40bd3c81affca4c24
cman-devel-2.0.115-124.el5.i386.rpm
aaa662173570a89b94db31474623b956a0eed7f03267bc172412156987e4d3b4
cman-devel-2.0.115-124.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
47d0a56df50fd6540dcbd8e1b0127d6bff6642f7de635d97cf7be297dcf0d2d8
cman-2.0.115-124.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1194 Moderate CentOS 5 conga Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1194 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1194.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
04e5e0f86b8d0bf3fe04c1c983fa8becf1500bf360b87d248243458d4f3eefff
luci-0.12.2-81.el5.centos.i386.rpm
0061f230cdcd3d46bd1c5358ec37ab0d84abe81c6e16b0e2eaa1d7e4df14c0f6
ricci-0.12.2-81.el5.centos.i386.rpm
x86_64:
c1ca03a030c31340dd83a4be872b9f7e4bc6b77a0f0cb658487bd2ac549b4c9a
luci-0.12.2-81.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
369710d4c54a3824724f008d0ad899bc34bc5e83b4c4cade5435b700abd40978
ricci-0.12.2-81.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
dea15aec32c5f631edd35abd3b39d36f1ba61f8d3c3fd48775a5ef9dc2e4619e
conga-0.12.2-81.el5.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1233 CentOS 5 coolkey BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1233
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1233.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
db771c8a2f590f1deb3784a0d25254d8ac2c6cccef10f943036165f0fa205e80
coolkey-1.1.0-17.el5.i386.rpm
a349543ceb54c7df82fde833b66ba4a109028f0f3f1d5be4c959f5cb32533cc4
coolkey-devel-1.1.0-17.el5.i386.rpm
x86_64:
db771c8a2f590f1deb3784a0d25254d8ac2c6cccef10f943036165f0fa205e80
coolkey-1.1.0-17.el5.i386.rpm
0723ceb879eb50ccfe80dd00db14076f62aaff6ec576b5df847a29696e226d6e
coolkey-1.1.0-17.el5.x86_64.rpm
a349543ceb54c7df82fde833b66ba4a109028f0f3f1d5be4c959f5cb32533cc4
coolkey-devel-1.1.0-17.el5.i386.rpm
d2b3e7457a5b231a28d4435c7757c7119b93f73d5da7bf7a3652924f00087d4d
coolkey-devel-1.1.0-17.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
34c27d5b8e359cb91cbe9a12b039c45878ebefd7b6ca061eee82a6049768c1cf
coolkey-1.1.0-17.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1228 CentOS 5 device-mapper-multipath BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1228
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1228.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
ebba8c48a07501e2e0bb91242a58e255fd8adc2bde7c07bad6bdfcf25fdcb757
device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7-63.el5.i386.rpm
bf16684401739598affd6d807858d828894843c5297184e0510af55f29e5
kpartx-0.4.7-63.el5.i386.rpm
x86_64:
73c5c7033a0408ff7bf494a6c4cc77866a0165993af9b294dcc26eae92c9c2bd
device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7-63.el5.x86_64.rpm
4459cf9417b9bb5f76cfc54273b99bfc3e66d6f0e425ddaa655f8796948dbf24
kpartx-0.4.7-63.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
dca4d59c3883d2d36482e413a37c7e139195c0d157ba889bedc170772e890e0a
device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7-63.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1208 CentOS 5 dmidecode Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1208
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1208.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
ba71ab589f800f898b16240e357c49a0718da4606c94a1aa3d4af97bb21e407f
dmidecode-2.12-1.el5.i386.rpm
x86_64:
585da0ad0a80a1b62cdb2d869ff304079671efa8ed2a3e8dbef857ca32ce77c3
dmidecode-2.12-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
9003cc679a24c39097081091753db6d56b064d1973cfaa3b5a79b8d65287b803
dmidecode-2.12-1.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1222 CentOS 5 e2fsprogs BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1222
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1222.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
50f4bf0f21df2fb9ed9a42737ec811787f304ed104891f43b3177a55bd60a13b
e2fsprogs-1.39-37.el5.i386.rpm
193195e2390372546bcc42ed07d0154e3dc922eb58996a0fbf52aa2ab078da6d
e2fsprogs-devel-1.39-37.el5.i386.rpm
208ff4cf3a94d2a574b08aa85aff845344b10bce7a8ca4759412073bbfd4aec6
e2fsprogs-libs-1.39-37.el5.i386.rpm
7c8943832c1e14fdbbe17f93c74027d823dcca872a98e6d0311e1cd0f98427fa
uuidd-1.39-37.el5.i386.rpm
x86_64:
0f6053d6bd464a3cc8527f8138ce1087316cd5753be773c25341cd1b7c9cc98d
e2fsprogs-1.39-37.el5.x86_64.rpm
193195e2390372546bcc42ed07d0154e3dc922eb58996a0fbf52aa2ab078da6d
e2fsprogs-devel-1.39-37.el5.i386.rpm
05bcdcfc5c34f17717349f12343809a9ce49aa73c9650068108d4f93f7694e48
e2fsprogs-devel-1.39-37.el5.x86_64.rpm
208ff4cf3a94d2a574b08aa85aff845344b10bce7a8ca4759412073bbfd4aec6
e2fsprogs-libs-1.39-37.el5.i386.rpm
8cf1c29fbefaa985c7dc86662bd7266046969b7e450439e956f7995e12e5325b
e2fsprogs-libs-1.39-37.el5.x86_64.rpm
1ccf819c410fc2faece64749da2246e04b5ff536ac6b02539ec6e9a76030c7c3
uuidd-1.39-37.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
3fcbe7820a402ca99e7109778f4e799d071d899caa263563139e5ded21055572
e2fsprogs-1.39-37.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1209 CentOS 5 gcc BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1209 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1209.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 6f14774b88e8f86a171d4bb128e9cff402f22713b941b7507607bb6c101f46b4 cpp-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm c1244909b03f5ebc6d494f39d1f3f6082ca1c4198ece795c163622762e996695 gcc-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm b5b3f0665d8e3b1312e8dfe3a1499e1d9f50035a5006e2f4867d41fe4ad34f87 gcc-c++-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 93193015a21e03bd8b9cbda43a42bf31219cae579fe99ddb4f0304d8dc098654 gcc-gfortran-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 9a97a73b0b76267a8e7c0dd621a264b7d3cf56bfc2a59e03ab3a08a1cdb08c4e gcc-gnat-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 7cf90ce87c02f083ab679cea5cdaef80ff01b2c462d4947353f909289d5c4d26 gcc-java-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 19ebce7136df83e62a88116451387c97eb29743585f3e192efb55d6ec9c43ad8 gcc-objc-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 5bbd936f3eaa564deaf6336e669cfa7e589e764cfaf6b54f62e6dbb2c0093f58 gcc-objc++-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 86427807fda38f84171f2c5a58cfcb383476db83c988098094032b139f770316 libgcc-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 8a3563975f7a2d96d2dffa8701965a151300ccf64dba926c2a58dbe176430440 libgcj-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 430df67b40a869fdc98cd57891017e7b2ef021ffd86266c82b902fb04246 libgcj-devel-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 406a9a359f885ad5887d17fd511215d54e8d12fccf0229e810d251587dee6605 libgcj-src-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm fde37daa76bee68d1954f998215402734aa9f1cb40498ece49d4ed465c5545d5 libgfortran-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 7f6ab6bd6214b086ecf8bd360d4ad9f937ac3355d28525bcef5b4bf0de29d952 libgnat-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 55810ed07dc6b740a06cdb3a2eb20193dcc5bd567599e826579467b73bbabf06 libmudflap-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 53cf9fdaebf63b5e4892889266e50c01f8155e794813557ca17519ddaf70255e libmudflap-devel-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm c87dec7a356429e72cda30e91ca09ce06c539dc4beee59214ae477e234f6d257 libobjc-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 82207f5435edd28ad73076b0967c600fbee69f6299aa5d4583b7e6c2deaab486 libstdc++-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 521a318fd3faedb3844a70ac362e31d9e339aa2a82524fded145681ed44fb422 libstdc++-devel-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm x86_64: b078853e154130bf0e17678145aab93468c5ceaf030a39b5e91780408329ef18 cpp-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm fcf8b8f11082e4edbb7294f9ba6de671c9953dae6de8a7d7a5a786b8e5d47bb2 gcc-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm 118750123adc00b34398e8e3152503eb2a35d9195ec280d29fe4207145609147 gcc-c++-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm 73352eaaa30a0cbce68a2fff11712aae5f70b161397fff7d1217e9a250fc4e03 gcc-gfortran-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm dc6aa061405c852ba8f74a2ec333b41b5319840479a7232fb6e682384234f38e gcc-gnat-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm 2e9d964bf76d4ce23e5d9f8f8c7e3c530d7c95b5ae698e40a0bd41a140d25b56 gcc-java-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm 72c0ba438b75c6b725c2ab43b6db32cc0a6ae6aad2834da0efd18cb5e7b541da gcc-objc-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm 9d4b5534621b788969764c186b669696591361a0a22c23b7a7c8fa26e6728add gcc-objc++-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm 86427807fda38f84171f2c5a58cfcb383476db83c988098094032b139f770316 libgcc-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 6c451737995e883a52f816716b1925eff8bee623d9b9928e56b16565efa47577 libgcc-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm 8a3563975f7a2d96d2dffa8701965a151300ccf64dba926c2a58dbe176430440 libgcj-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 958d429f3cbfa8cf2446ab22c14c508e4b90b5decae5147138af096f6266ca5a libgcj-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm 430df67b40a869fdc98cd57891017e7b2ef021ffd86266c82b902fb04246 libgcj-devel-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 80e035939c6a0ae3bca8f08dee8b23d59831fa2464788776705e6c4c8e3c11cf libgcj-devel-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm 89afc2d6f77af1149b4326529f1a1a8e26d79323d15b1491c903d56281f19ea1 libgcj-src-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm fde37daa76bee68d1954f998215402734aa9f1cb40498ece49d4ed465c5545d5 libgfortran-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm e0f34057feeec21deb84298cf2f430bda380bb3d14b713e6295287360576ccc9 libgfortran-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm 7f6ab6bd6214b086ecf8bd360d4ad9f937ac3355d28525bcef5b4bf0de29d952 libgnat-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 27d2ccfe223287c7fc35de08eaac3c7dde96deee14bfc500e2ecdc3eff3e68b5 libgnat-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm 55810ed07dc6b740a06cdb3a2eb20193dcc5bd567599e826579467b73bbabf06 libmudflap-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 05868321a6c0937df7d73e6a0ca069c4d7f0604a733919206ad0dae1d15733dc libmudflap-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm 53cf9fdaebf63b5e4892889266e50c01f8155e794813557ca17519ddaf70255e libmudflap-devel-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm f847c778ac0fcd00d2f17b15c44bbc2360c6bed75a25c1df5e04543680bab53d libmudflap-devel-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm c87dec7a356429e72cda30e91ca09ce06c539dc4beee59214ae477e234f6d257 libobjc-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 0f96472c3b2977863f779a8837b57cd31bf917d1a86639d79dcb0314bab72940 libobjc-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm 82207f5435edd28ad73076b0967c600fbee69f6299aa5d4583b7e6c2deaab486 libstdc++-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm 6bb3f5e08070bf8abe8ddb467d5011e7f2b7b1f6c3fd3803ceb43294112a7c7c libstdc++-4.1.2-55.el5.x86_64.rpm 521a318fd3faedb3844a70ac362e31d9e339aa2a82524fded145681ed44fb422 libstdc++-devel-4.1.2-55.el5.i386.rpm
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1203 CentOS 5 gfs2-utils BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1203
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1203.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
3311129bace558a6bfe932bb637905df31329a15f77c6d866d9e76fcefd8250e
gfs2-utils-0.1.62-44.el5.i386.rpm
x86_64:
d5ea8a250f8fdf1f64f6dd46c854775087f9cae534d6860a6c206fe903ec3bd5
gfs2-utils-0.1.62-44.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
fa3082fcd15822fac6ed57f8174092ebd638b34cfe7f5f7a363296317820e9bb
gfs2-utils-0.1.62-44.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1234 CentOS 5 gfs-kmod BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1234
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1234.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
f20302719dd6cedf4615a4bbbe171b20047aa0b022c897aaeb8e5b4c17d7ace6
kmod-gfs-0.1.34-22.el5.centos.i686.rpm
fee3b5409487ccb52f353578d67f23105a04e0e22f29b6abf4d1025c27ed8ff7
kmod-gfs-PAE-0.1.34-22.el5.centos.i686.rpm
4395f984ae072e04f2f8c422f3e3c30ff3cf1959239569fe53bbe5cb72a7a308
kmod-gfs-xen-0.1.34-22.el5.centos.i686.rpm
x86_64:
e6f82f403c08d59d037306429fae502bf1cee77ab38bc98272746df92241d2d2
kmod-gfs-0.1.34-22.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
060965ceabd4fc62381fb6e6867ae5b37ffd9d4a6eb74164679ff5f2202d09c1
kmod-gfs-xen-0.1.34-22.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
2bdf1268ebf6923969709fda50f1f547ea407d5ae6a648aa11335f59cb0623c4
gfs-kmod-0.1.34-22.el5.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1213 CentOS 5 glibc BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1213
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1213.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
d13171004c1818b9121b43da105b72287e7389dc7593d182203c122397c9be8d
glibc-2.5-123.i386.rpm
1f5788f0cdb89fc373d1f329afae562b6d3dd6988d0c6bd531939657dc3c08db
glibc-2.5-123.i686.rpm
1455034aa6701824f9f2ea8336d26215152e9a07c22d8eba0972ab9ddd0bd57a
glibc-common-2.5-123.i386.rpm
4b4d54000c4ecc1ec3e7f1c9527fa27a38b24d766b5278e5d990a8ea0e047f10
glibc-devel-2.5-123.i386.rpm
c1c99325464120b486067449c8b7af22835867abd259f41aea893b5ddb4dd0a3
glibc-headers-2.5-123.i386.rpm
a6c27f5924048a44d37150f5a80db4e3bde78d50f9e9b8c423cd68f22d5be588
glibc-utils-2.5-123.i386.rpm
8c8a87ba134b5c50d2bd8eee588c2541b1003fc20e0960ca1607b71eb21d32f6
nscd-2.5-123.i386.rpm
x86_64:
1f5788f0cdb89fc373d1f329afae562b6d3dd6988d0c6bd531939657dc3c08db
glibc-2.5-123.i686.rpm
de9fd1452b0abc619f8de9a3d9f498f4e3b64882c9def53cc07ece70cfa38ac1
glibc-2.5-123.x86_64.rpm
77b0a801d3c809711588c455bbdfb8dee118cec4f328a352c3bf255916d85e7b
glibc-common-2.5-123.x86_64.rpm
4b4d54000c4ecc1ec3e7f1c9527fa27a38b24d766b5278e5d990a8ea0e047f10
glibc-devel-2.5-123.i386.rpm
b8dbb5eac552ded293138e3e443a5ec193c16e76f90e0b79705fbc63daabd23d
glibc-devel-2.5-123.x86_64.rpm
29cd72f8eef57e7626cd2a72bdda0a530f979fe7a0f9d7edba04f019b73c8ae8
glibc-headers-2.5-123.x86_64.rpm
afe6366bd05368067102ec22bba927d3267157ab6530f1c6f8d76c87936f9f3a
glibc-utils-2.5-123.x86_64.rpm
d020c3e226657ce05723eedbd0cf7822ed0781df2e6d5846030d20c5d7ce9083
nscd-2.5-123.x86_64.rpm
Source:
04e8aae4f97204e9af8dfc22a79040e59114d6ea249474b46904b90426722c3b
glibc-2.5-123.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1232 CentOS 5 httpd BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1232
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1232.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
35bba989e01b24ba3d87b5852b237fd43f9bbbc3a1b385e04e57e0e7037c9d56
httpd-2.2.3-91.el5.centos.i386.rpm
b36af5d923a038ae835cda296fe6fbf573f2162aa48493e1133f214f82dcec73
httpd-devel-2.2.3-91.el5.centos.i386.rpm
becd9f417197c7c8f7a344746c78abc78c6b3714e7e6947e71cf20f304b01161
httpd-manual-2.2.3-91.el5.centos.i386.rpm
98bc786db5ac7c0fd30b8f911fc9e3d6afaf6ad0064118648de1a28125a940e9
mod_ssl-2.2.3-91.el5.centos.i386.rpm
x86_64:
9df8246f79dd77308841b0d46a287236069791a177056c00e68b744adb60feba
httpd-2.2.3-91.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
b36af5d923a038ae835cda296fe6fbf573f2162aa48493e1133f214f82dcec73
httpd-devel-2.2.3-91.el5.centos.i386.rpm
dcd208cf09b0071b5fc668049619c1f971783e9afe4297a3fa9b5c59f246b710
httpd-devel-2.2.3-91.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
a315604757f9c7803bbfa3e91bb43f419d448974026857ce2dfffb7593ac2f1a
httpd-manual-2.2.3-91.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
29eac7becbb810f7a2827667dfd4c2242fc84cc54541e4f17b5dd63c27317c8e
mod_ssl-2.2.3-91.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
42dc0e2a4452f3dde34406ba884490001b4ebb2f0597b3f00933f31276ceab25
httpd-2.2.3-91.el5.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1220 CentOS 5 hwdata Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1220
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1220.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
b55171e11c100df1f7e349ad3d186bfaf93d0f491282fe8d071c526d908c2b69
hwdata-0.213.30-1.el5.noarch.rpm
x86_64:
b55171e11c100df1f7e349ad3d186bfaf93d0f491282fe8d071c526d908c2b69
hwdata-0.213.30-1.el5.noarch.rpm
Source:
e1e0d08a91c6080cc09427edfe2cadd6729c5a352b36b6e57cca05198b42c8f7
hwdata-0.213.30-1.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
