Re: [CGUYS] Why not build back up function into the computer?? (was back up question: what to back up and what doesn't need backing up?)

2007-05-10 Thread Alvin Auerbach

Built-in back-up software:
Please see the info on Apple's web site about the Time Machine 
back-up software built into the forthcoming Mac OS 10.5 Leopard.


Built-in back-up hardware:
Time Machine will use a user provided external hard drive. Adding 
the software gives the Mac OS a competitive advantage. Adding the 
hardware, and therefore needing to increase the price of the 
computer, would give Apple a competitive disadvantage; so they leave 
that purchasing decision to the consumer.


Alvin



Tony,

Sounds good, but I'd have to first learn what you are talking about 
and how to do it :)


After reading your response and Mike's this thought occurred to me: 
Everyone who seems to know much about computers seems to advise that 
everyone regularly back up their computer.  The same for running 
antivirus, spyware, adware and whatever else I'm leaving out or not 
aware of.  Yet I believe I've heard the stat that only a fairly 
small minority of users (not speaking of businesses) actually back 
up regularly, not to mention doing the other important security 
things (spyware, etc.)  The figure 20% of users doing regular back 
ups comes to mind, though not sure where I heard this or how 
accurate it is.


Nevertheless, if regular backing up is something that everyone who 
owns and uses a computer should be doing, regardless of their 
technical expertise, why isn't backing up - the hardware and the 
software - a built in function of the computer itself?  Or are there 
some computers that actually do this? I envision a modular set up 
with a back up drive that could easily be removed, which could also 
maybe make extra copies for separate storage at the same time onto 
DVDS, CDS.  I also envision the back up function running 
automatically as a default (or as automatically as possible, say, 
every day at least) and that before each back up, built in 
anti-virus software, spyware, adware, whatever-else ware software 
would be run on the info to be backed up, so a clean backup would be 
likely.  Maybe even  some diagnostic exam to see if one is about to 
back up corrupted or damaged files, etc.  If backing up or checking 
for spyware are important if not essential functions that should be 
performed regularly, they should be built in as part of the computer 
to the extent feasible, IMO.


Is this asking too much or somehow unrealistic?  It just seems to me 
that if something should be done as a regular part of using a 
computer, why not build it in and make it as easy and as automatic 
to use as possible, for all levels of users?  So if someone wants, 
take my idea and go make millions on it; just remember me and send 
me a small royalty if you don't mind!  I realize most PC makers 
don't usually also develop software for their computers, but maybe 
Apple could do this or maybe more PC makers could and should start 
producing an integrated, whole product.


Could the fact that Apple develops both its software and its 
hardware be part of why it is generally considered a better product? 
Knowing little about the technical aspects of any of this, it 
intuitively seems like it designing an integrated product - hardware 
and software (including my back up module :)) - would more likely 
avoid glitches and produce a better product.  Just wondering.


I wonder if companies like Apple, Microsoft or PC developers ever 
hire novices or average users to give them feedback on what is 
needed or desirable in their products or if they basically only get 
the perspective and feedback of techies, programmers, and 
experienced users?  From my perspective, computers and everything 
about them (still) seem unnecessarily complex and complicated, 
though admittedly this is based just on PCs.


I do realize it is the American way to have endless choices and 
options for each of these things - ways of backing up, spyware, 
anti-virus, firewalls, adware, ISPS, email program, this program, 
that program, etc.  However, for myself, and I suspect many, maybe 
most, average or novice users, all these choices simply add too much 
complexity, too many decisions, too many things to think about as 
far as whether they work with each other program or each piece of 
hardware, leading to the requirement of spending too much time and 
energy (mental and otherwise).  Perhaps those who are much more 
knowledgeable about all of this like having so many options, but I 
think many users, myself included, would simply like a computer that 
works reliably, with as much of this stuff being pre-packaged and 
automated as possible.  We would like it to be more like buying a 
new car, where what you need and want, as much as possible, comes 
with the car, not programs or hardware that you have to make 
decisions about and purchase subsequent to purchasing the car.  The 
goal should be an integrated product and simplicity, not unnecessary 
fragmentation and thus unnecessary complexity.


I also realize such complexity does create jobs for some who like 
and 

Re: [CGUYS] Bees on the Beeb

2007-05-10 Thread Jacoby, Robert Andrew
Straight from the horse's mouth about bees  cellphones:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003694330_beerapture0
5.html

A small German study looking at a specific type of cordless phone and
homing systems of bees exploded over the Internet and late-night
television shows. It morphed into erroneous reports blaming cellphones
for the honeybee die-off, which scientists are calling colony-collapse
disorder, or CCD.

The scientist who wrote the paper, Stefan Kimmel, emphasized there is
no link between our tiny little study and the CCD-phenomenon ...
anything else said or written is a lie.





Robert Jacoby
Reference/Electronic Services Librarian
University of Toledo LaValley Law Library
-Original Message-
From: Computer Guys Announcements and Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of b_s-wilk
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 12:51 AM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Bees on the Beeb

 More on bees and cellphones: on the BBC News Hour, a discussion about
 colony collapse syndrome and cellphones.  One of the interviewees was
 some kind of officer of Vodaphone, and he didn't think that
 cellphones were involved.  (Quelle surprise.)
 
 Tomorrow (Thursday): more bees on WAMU, on the Diane Rehm show (10:00
 a.m.-noon).  I tried to find out whether bees would be discussed on
 the 10:00 show or the 11:00, but that information wasn't posted on
 the WAMU website.  (You can always listen later on the archives
 section of the website.)
 
 Chances are, the subject of bees and cellphones will come up, sooner
 or later.  I kind of doubt that cellphones were involved--let alone
 the sole cause--but who knows?  They haven't found a cause yet.
 Quite a lot of the food supply depends on bees.  I'd kind of miss
 food, if it weren't around.

I suspect they'll find out that it's a combination of factors: mites, 
fungus, pesticides, GM crops, electromagnetism. Lots of people have said

that electricity, sound, microwaves aren't likely suspects, however, I 
worked on an experiment many years ago to test whether electromagnetic 
fields would affect growth patterns of several varieties of moss. The 
moss within the field grew more than twice as high [6-10] as those 
plants outside the field. However we didn't determine exactly why. Bees 
may also be affected. Determining exactly how and why bees are affected 
by environmental factors can be done, but remedies may need significant 
changes in farm, landscape and forestry practices. I'd miss food, too. 
Does cacao need bees?

Podcast URL for Diane Rehm show is
http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441i
d=160993127
or http://www.npr.org/rss/podcast.php?id=510071



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Bees on the Beeb

2007-05-10 Thread John DeCarlo

On 5/9/07, Constance Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Tomorrow (Thursday): more bees on WAMU, on the Diane Rehm show (10:00
a.m.-noon).  I tried to find out whether bees would be discussed on
the 10:00 show or the 11:00, but that information wasn't posted on
the WAMU website.  (You can always listen later on the archives
section of the website.)



As for the real cause(s), that remains to be determined.  Film at 11.

Figuring out that mites were killing bees a few years ago was not as
difficult because you had all these dead bees in the hives.

With colony collapse disorder, you just have empty (or relatively empty)
hives - the bees that fly out aren't coming back.

You don't have as many specimens to examine.  There are probably multiple
causes.  Talk about an experimenter's nightmare.

--
John DeCarlo, My Views Are My Own



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



[CGUYS] Power Buttons

2007-05-10 Thread John DeCarlo

Another usability issue with power buttons:  what should they do and when?

In the old days, push a power button and something turns on or off.

On many computers nowadays, push the button for less than 3-8 seconds (it
varies by manufacturer) and it does one thing.  Hold it in for longer and it
will power off the computer.

I have had at least five people tell me the power button on their computer
was broken, because it wouldn't turn off the computer.  As a geek, I just
tried holding it in longer without even thinking about it.

--
John DeCarlo, My Views Are My Own



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



[CGUYS] Soundblaster question -

2007-05-10 Thread Tom Chambers

List members -
 I have an old Soundblaster card which I'd like to put in a 
Win2000 Pro machine .I've long
since lost the setup discs if I ever had them . What should I do to get 
the card running ?

Many thanks in advance ,
  Tom







* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] digital pics

2007-05-10 Thread Paula Minor

I don't know her, but in general these are often also some of the
worst photographers - taking 100 pics and keeping all 100 of them!

Of course, with digital cameras it's sometimes advisable to overshoot,
but if I can't delete 90% of the pics I take I feel I'm doing
something wrong.
I guess I'm one of those worst photographers.with 4 different  
cameras that go everywhere with me so that I can get just the right  
shots which is often dependent on the abilities of a particular  
camera.  I KEEP 90% of them because even the bad ones can often be  
used for composites, backgrounds...examples of what went wrong, etc.   
I'm not a professional photographer but am a good one so not everyone  
who keeps all their photos is a bad photographer.


Paula
IN/USA
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of  
arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather  
to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, wine in the other, body  
thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming WOO HOO what a  
ride! Have a wonderful day!









* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Power Buttons

2007-05-10 Thread Tom Piwowar
 On many computers nowadays, push the button for less than 3-8 seconds (it
 varies by manufacturer) and it does one thing.  Hold it in for longer and 
 it will power off the computer.

That longer press is to force the computer off. This puts open files and 
cached data at risk. Better to turn it off via software. That starts an 
orderly shutdown process.



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Upgrading Laptop Hard Drive

2007-05-10 Thread Tom Piwowar
Thank you all for the suggestions.  As more background, no, I do not store,
edit, or view videos on my laptop and I am in fact mystified as to how it
filled up. 

Could be a big temp, scratch, or cache file. I have seen these grow to 
many useless GB.



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] three-finger command et al.

2007-05-10 Thread Tom Piwowar
Yes you can set up Windows to bypass security, but is this a good idea?


What three-finger command are you talking about? My XP Pro desktop at
home is locked but running 24/7. I merely click on my USERID icon
and enter the password. My work machine uses a CAC. Once again no
three-finger command. To power up any of these machines, including my
MBP, I depress the power button and enter my credentials at the login
screens.



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



[CGUYS] Macintosh Question

2007-05-10 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
There is a web site somewhere on Apples site that will tell me what 
OS a particular model of Apple Macintosh Computer can run.


Can someone point there.

I am asking about Power Macintosh 7800/180's

Stewart

Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace
Ozark, AL  SL 82



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Macintosh Question

2007-05-10 Thread Roger D. Parish

At 9:25 PM -0500 5/10/07, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:

There is a web site somewhere on Apples site that will tell me what 
OS a particular model of Apple Macintosh Computer can run.


Can someone point there.

I am asking about Power Macintosh 7800/180's


http://www.info.apple.com/support/applespec.legacy/powermacintosh.html

There is no 7800/180 listed. There is a 7300/180. Supported OSes are 
7.5.5 thru 9.

--
Roger
Lovettsville, VA



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived