Re: [css-d] CSS linear gradient in Android tablet not extending to bottom of page

2013-01-29 Thread Gautam Sathe 
On 01/29/2013 07:52 AM, Debbie Campbell wrote:
 In my 10 Android tablet in landscape view, the CSS3 background 
 gradient doesn't stretch to the bottom of the page, it only fills the 
 browser window. If you have to scroll down, the background is white 
 below the original window. Can someone point me in the right direction 
 to fix it or suggest another way to handle it?

 http://www.redkitecreative.com/projects/prsold/construction-and-commercial/


Really strange.

I am looking at the link on a 7 tab... I don't seem to be getting any gradient 
at all for the background.

I can send a screenshot off-list if you want.

--
Gautam
Disclaimer

  The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the
  use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
  authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally
  privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are
  hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any
  action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
  prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication
  in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this email and
  then delete it from your system. The company is neither liable for the
  proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this
  communication nor for any delay in its receipt.

__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] Web Dev Toolbar debugging hiccup

2016-08-04 Thread Gautam Sathe 

Hard to say without knowing what else might be going on for you.

I just checked on my system, I am able to view up to 1680px width 
without facing any issues.


#1. The most obvious question - is your system actually high res enough 
to view a 12xx pixel screen?


#2. Have you put the chrome dev tools in mobile emulation mode? That 
restricts the size to whatever device you might be emulating.


If you have already considered these points then a screenshot of what's 
happening might help.


Gautam

On Friday 05 August 2016 09:38 AM, Crest Christopher wrote:

I need to view a page at 12XX+ pixels but when I enabled Chrome Web Dev
Toolbar it shrinks the page to a smaller break point.  When I tear off
the web developer toolbar it doesn't make a difference; any suggestions ?
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/




__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] td:nth-child(2) negation?

2017-08-03 Thread Gautam Sathe 

On Wednesday 02 August 2017 08:54 PM, Eric A. Meyer wrote:
I confess to being a little bit confused here, because I read this as 
you asking about a 'td' that's a child of another 'td' and I don't think 
that's a thing.  Could you provide some markup samples to illustrate 
cases where you do and don't want selection to occur?


Apologies for jumping in uninvited :)

I believe what Felix meant is this:

He wants all td's that are nth child (2) i.e. the second TD of each TR 
to be subjected to a particular rule EXCEPT if they also have a colspan.


i.e if a second TD has a colspan the rule should not apply.

I could have misunderstood his requirement of course - in which case the 
code I sent last time would also be invalid.


Cheers
--
Gautam Sathe
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] td:nth-child(2) negation?

2017-08-03 Thread Gautam Sathe 

On Thursday 03 August 2017 02:12 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:

td:not([colspan=2]):nth-child(2) {}


I missed the "=2" in the colspan :) Good to learn a new trick.

Thanks Philippe.
--
Gautam Sathe
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] td:nth-child(2) negation?

2017-07-28 Thread Gautam Sathe 


On Friday 28 July 2017 12:16 PM, Felix Miata wrote:

Can a :not be used to make td:nth-child(2) not applicable if the element that
the td is a second child of is a td subjected to a colspan? If so, how?


Hi Felix,

I have not tested this extensively for compatibility with all browsers - 
but I believe something like this could do what you are looking for:


[code]
td {
background-color: red;
}
td:nth-child(2) {
background-color: yellow;
}
td[colspan]:not([colspan="1"]) {
background-color: green;
}
td[colspan]:not(:nth-child(2)) {
background-color: black;
}


Personally, I would not code such complex rules into CSS, I believe a 
templating engine which applies logic at the server level would be a 
saner choice.


What is the use case?

Regards
--
Gautam Sathe
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/