date:20031118

-Caveat Lector-

The assumption that events will
conform to a preconceived model is a failing to which neoconservatives are
notably vulnerable. Part of this may be Marxist residue that never quite
washed off. The intellectual descendants of Trotskyists, the neocons find the idea
of revolution from above, in which intellectuals and ideas play the crucial
role, instinctively appealing. Many neocons also tend to buy into overly
deterministic, Hegelian theories of history (see Fukuyama, Frank). In this
sense, the assumption that Iraq was destined to become a liberal democracy
with just a nudge from the United States is an error akin to Jeanne J.
Kirkpatrick's Hannah Arendt-inspired view that Communist totalitarian
societies could never reform from within. There was nothing wrong with that
theory either, except that it happened to be completely wrong.

Another reason the neocons go for grand theories may be that their
primary experience tends to come from the classroom, rather than the real
world. Colin Powell, who took fire in Vietnam, has a visceral sense of what
happens when a military engagement turns sour that those who served out the
war at the University of Chicago may lack. What's more, few neoconservatives
have cultivated a deep appreciation or understanding of other culturesunless
you count the Athens of Pericles or Machiavelli's Florence.

http://slate.msn.com/id/2090852/

Slate

the big ideaOccupational HazardsHow the Pentagon
forgot about running Iraq.By Jacob
WeisbergPosted Thursday, Nov. 6, 2003, at 9:44 AM PT
The shooting down on Sunday of a Chinook helicopter, which claimed more
American lives than any episode since the fall of Saddam Hussein, confirms what
the Bush administration has spent weeks attempting to deny: The occupation of
Iraq is going badly.
It is not at all surprising that we've run into trouble over there. The
difficulties we have faced, from looting to the lack of viable institutions,
were largely to be expected from a devastated post-totalitarian society in a
part of the world overwhelmingly hostile to the United States and its interests.
What is surprisingamazing, in factis how unprepared we were for these
problems. Much of the discussion in the postwar period was focused on the
question of where those weapons of mass destruction went. An even more important
question is how the Bush administration failed to prepare for what it knew was
coming. How did the world's greatest military power plan the invasion of a
country without also planning its occupation?
David Rieff's Nov. 2 article in the New York Times
Magazine offers pieces of an answer. The neoconservative Iraq hawks inside
the PentagonPaul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, and Douglas Feiththought our troops
would be welcomed as liberators and that the Iraqi National Congress could run
the country for us (a view Gideon Rose demolished in
Slate back in April). Wolfowitz, in particular, was
known for his view that fixing Iraq would provoke a reverse-domino effect of
democratization throughout the Middle East. Those who bought into this wishful
thinking didn't want to
hear about the potential problems.
The hawks' big mistake was not in thinking that optimistic scenario might be
borne out. Their mistakeespecially stunning because the Pentagon is essentially
a planning agencywas not preparing for alternate scenarios that were, at the
very least, equally likely. The neoconservative architects of the invasion seem
not to have, at any point, seriously engaged the question, "What if things do
not go the way we hope they will?" What if the Iraqis are glad to be rid of
Saddam but not glad to have the Marines as neighbors? What if Ahmad Chalabi
turns out not to be the next Vaclav Havel? The Pentagon spends hundreds of
millions of dollars staging elaborate war games to help anticipate unexpected
turns in battle. Somehow, it neglected to game out the postwar peace.
The assumption that events will conform to a preconceived model is a failing
to which neoconservatives are notably vulnerable. Part of this may be Marxist
residue that never quite washed off. The intellectual descendants of Trotskyists, the neocons find the idea of revolution
from above, in which intellectuals and ideas play the crucial role,
instinctively appealing. Many neocons also tend to buy into overly
deterministic, Hegelian theories of history (see Fukuyama, Frank). In this
sense, the assumption that Iraq was destined to become a liberal democracy with
just a nudge from the United States is an error akin to Jeanne J. Kirkpatrick's
Hannah Arendt-inspired view that Communist totalitarian societies could never
reform from within. There was nothing wrong with that theory either, except that
it happened to be completely wrong.
Another reason the neocons go for grand theories may be that their primary
experience tends to come from the classroom, rather than the real

[CTRL] Pentagon Debunks Reports on Osama-Saddam Ties

-Caveat Lector-

No matter how many lies neocons and neocon
media outlets are caught telling, they continue to tell lie after lie, even when
they know they are going to be caught yet again.

Neoconservatism appears to be less an
ideology than a severe personality disorder which radically disconnects neocons
from reality. Neocons basically will say anything, tell any lie, and adopt
any ideology which supports whatever ideathat has taken fanatical root in
their heads at any given moment. They are unresponsive to stimuli and data
from the real world. Perhaps neoconservatism is linked to autism in some
way? Is it a genetic thing?

Connected with the disorder is a total
absence of shame for whatever outrages one has committed in the past. The
more the neocons are exposed as liars, the more stridently self-righteous they
become.

It is incomprehensible to any sane person
that Douglas Feith would recirculate lies at this stage in the game which he had
to KNOW would be shot down by his own Defense Department. What makes a guy
like this tick?

http://www.mediainfo.com/editorandpublisher/headlines/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=2030480

Editor
Publisher

NOVEMBER 18, 2003Pentagon
Debunks Reports on Osama-Saddam Ties Some Outlets
Run With 'Weekly Standard' Story By Seth
Porges NEW YORK --
Several newspapers and other media outlets had
egg on their face Monday after reporting or endorsing a Weekly Standard
story revealing new evidence of an "operational relationship" between Saddam
Hussein and Osama Bin Laden. Several outlets,
including the New York Post, The Washington Times and FOX News, ran with
the story. There was just one problem: On Saturday, the Pentagon issued a press
release stating that "news reports that the Defense Department recently
confirmed new information with respect to contacts between al-Qaida and Iraq ...
are inaccurate."Despite this, the New York
Post on Monday titled its editorial on the subject: "Bush Was Right."In the current Nov. 24 issue of the conservative
journal The Weekly Standard, Stephen F. Hayes writes that Osama bin Laden
and Saddam Hussein "had an operational relationship from the early 1990s to 2003
that involved training in explosives and weapons of mass destruction, logistical
support for terrorist attacks, al Qaeda training camps and safe haven in Iraq,
and Iraqi financial support for al Qaeda." The
magazine's revelations allegedly came from a "top secret U.S. government
memorandum obtained by The Weekly Standard." The Pentagon press release,
however, states that the classified sections of the document contained "raw
reports" and "was not an analysis of the substantive issue of the relationship
between Iraq and al Qaida and it drew no conclusions."The Nov. 17 New York Post editorial made no mention of the
Pentagon refuting the charge as "inaccurate."Also
on Monday, The Washington Times carried an editorial on the issue, using
The Weekly Standard article as evidence. At the end of the editorial, the
Times mentions the Pentagon release, but urges "readers to examine the
Weekly Standard article and decide for themselves."On Nov. 16, The Washington Post's Walter Pincus reported that
the CIA has found "no evidence that Hussein sought to arm terrorists."The New York Post editorial opens: "As blood flowed freely again this weekend in the War
on Terror, this time in Turkey as well as Iraq, a new report in The Weekly
Standard suggests that events there may not be unrelated. "In fact, the report by Stephen Hayes -- based on a top-secret
government memo -- documents an even more profound linkage: between none other
than Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. "According to Hayes, the memo, provides enormous evidence that the
Bush team was right all along about Saddam's terrorist ties -- despite charges
to the contrary by the president's foes, particularly Democrats
..." Source:
Editor Publisher Online

Seth Porges ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
is a reporter for EP.
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL

[CTRL] A Web of Spin, Lies and Self-Delusion

Title: GN Online: Youssef M. Ibrahim: Get the American GIs out of Iraq
-Caveat Lector-




  Not since the Vietnam disaster, 
  which cost well over 50,000 American and more than a million Vietnamese lives, 
  has a debacle of the scale unfolding in Iraq been visited upon the American 
  people. This is a war constructed on ideological premises uncomfortably 
  resembling those that led us to Vietnam: a web of spin, lies and 
  self-delusion. Bush has not, to this day, given the world a credible 
  reason for putting the lives of over 150,000 Americans in harm's way - no 
  weapons of mass destruction found, no democracy is mushrooming, no light looms 
  at the end this dark tunnel. Worse yet, the great Iraqi silent 
  majority, according to the latest CIA confidential report leaked to the 
  "Philadelphia Inquirer" a few days ago, is tilting against the US and the 
  puppet Iraqi government we have put in Baghdad, as people become poorer, less 
  safe and harassed by frightened and confused American troops in their homes 
  and villages. 
http://www.gulf-news.com/Articles/print.asp?ArticleID=103200


  
  



  
Youssef 
  M. Ibrahim: Get the American GIs out of Iraq
  
|Special to 
  Gulf News|18/11/2003
  

  

  Looking 
  at the American debacle in Iraq through Arab eyes, the solution is starkly 
  evident: put American forces under the command of General Kofi Anan, 
  otherwise known as Secretary-General of the United Nations, immediately. 
  Get the French, Germans and the European Union - along with China, 
  India and the rest of the world community - to send their soldiers under 
  blue caps as peace-keeping forces, as they all readily agree they would if 
  commanded by the United Nations.And, above all, get the American 
  GIs out. Sooner or later an exceedingly stubborn and lonely George 
  W. Bush Administration will have to reach that conclusion. Problem is, as 
  long as it drags its feet, this administration is doing untold damage to 
  the reputation and values of the US, once the most admired in this part of 
  the world.It is creating a deep hatred in the Arab, and more 
  important, the much bigger 1.2 billion Muslim world around the globe that 
  will haunt us for years to come, feeding the ranks of the very same 
  terrorists we are hoping to eradicate. Instead of winning the war on 
  terror, President Bush is fanning its flames. As long as we remain 
  an occupation force in Iraq, the worst case scenario is an expansion of 
  the ongoing collapse of American prestige, respect, credibility and power 
  . At the end of this tunnel lies a defeat which history will judge to have 
  been entirely an American domestic political design. It is 
  unconscionable of the Bush crowd of hawkish neo-conservatives, Evangelical 
  Christians and pro-Likud supporters of Israel to drive matters to that 
  extent, solely for the questionable purpose of gaining electoral votes. 
  Indeed it is self-defeating. Bush may loose his job along with the US 
  clout in the Iraqi quagmire. Web of spinNot since 
  the Vietnam disaster, which cost well over 50,000 American and more than a 
  million Vietnamese lives, has a debacle of the scale unfolding in Iraq 
  been visited upon the American people. This is a war constructed on 
  ideological premises uncomfortably resembling those that led us to 
  Vietnam: a web of spin, lies and self-delusion. Bush has not, to 
  this day, given the world a credible reason for putting the lives of over 
  150,000 Americans in harm's way - no weapons of mass destruction found, no 
  democracy is mushrooming, no light looms at the end this dark tunnel. 
  Worse yet, the great Iraqi silent majority, according to the 
  latest CIA confidential report leaked to the "Philadelphia Inquirer" a few 
  days ago, is tilting against the US and the puppet Iraqi government we 
  have put in Baghdad, as people become poorer, less safe and harassed by 
  frightened and confused American troops in their homes and villages. 
  Instead of facing up to this, the Bush crowd is now plotting to 
  get out and leave the puppet government in charge with all what that 
  entails of danger including a return to a Saddam Hussain-style autocracy, 
  or a civil war.Is it a surprise then that no one wants to come and 
  help? The Turks, having pocketed $8 billion to send 10,000 troops, now say 
  they aren't coming. The Red Cross has folded its tent in Iraq. The 
  United Nations is refusing to co-operate and the Japanese and Koreans have 
  just said they are re-thinking their promise to send forces. Even 
  our friends, the Brits, have quietly cut their forces from 45,000 during 
  the invasion to less than 15,000 now. Meanwhile in Iraq, American forces 
  which a few

[CTRL] MSN Newsbot to Challenge Google News

Title: Microsoft Tests Answer to Google News
-Caveat Lector-

Consider the data mining/surveillance possibilities for a global
central intelligence with access to all the net clicks on the world (including
all searches):

The most innovative Newsbot feature is personalization. MSN users who
sign in to Microsoft Passport received personalized news based on previously
demonstrated interests. It can show news from sources that person clicked on
in the past, or suggest stories based on previously shown interests, the
company said.
"We pay attention to the usage of the service for many reasons

http://www.internetnews.com/IAR/print.php/3110201

\n');
}
if ( plugin )
{
document.write('');
document.write(' ');
document.write(' ');document.write(' ');
document.write(' ');
}
else if (!(navigator.appName && navigator.appName.indexOf("Netscape")>=0 && navigator.appVersion.indexOf("2.")>=0))
{document.write('');
}
//-->
>

Microsoft Tests
Answer to Google News By Pamela ParkerNovember 18,
2003
Software giant Microsoft is testing its answer to Google's popular news
aggregator and search site. "MSN Newsbot", on MSN UK, France, Spain and
Italy, signals at least one of Microsoft's intentions as it seeks to build
out its own search technology.
Newsbot aggregates headlines from over 4,000 sources on the Internet,
apparently provided by partner Moreover Technologies. Headlines are
clustered by topic and displayed based on algorithms Microsoft
established, the company said in a FAQ about the beta service. Those
algorithms consider the number of sources covering the story, when the
story was published, and how many people have looked at a particular
story.
Overture text ads are served on the main Newsbot page, as well as on
news search results. It's not clear what criteria are used to target the
ads. On Monday, both Overture listings featured merchants selling chimney
flue liners. The top story on the page concerned a gangplank collapse that
killed 15 people trying to board a British liner in France. Microsoft renewed its
deal with Overture earlier this year. Overture paid listings will
continue to appear on MSN in the U.S. and the U.K. through June, 2005.
The Newsbot service is a glimpse at what Microsoft's been up to in the
hot search arena, amidst much speculation about the company's intentions.
The Redmond, Wash.-based software company has made significant investments
in the search arena, tripling staffing levels as it works to catch up with
Google and Yahoo! Microsoft has been very quiet about strategy specifics,
especially in regard to paid search.
The most innovative Newsbot feature is personalization. MSN users who
sign in to Microsoft Passport received personalized news based on
previously demonstrated interests. It can show news from sources that
person clicked on in the past, or suggest stories based on previously
shown interests, the company said.
"We pay attention to the usage of the service for many reasons. We want
to make MSN Newsbot (beta) more useful for our users," MSN says on its
site. "By tracking the most popular stories, we can build a 'most popular'
list for each section of news -- speeding discovery of what stories the
world is reading. By telling users that 'People who read this story also
read...' we can reduce the time it takes to find other interesting
stories."
Personalization features aside, the Newsbot service is close to a
perfect echo of Google's News service, also still in beta after appearing
in September, 2002.
MSN choice of Moreover Technologies as a news provider is interesting.
The latter company worked with Yahoo! on its news search.

Contact internetnews.com staff

Jupitermedia is publisher of the internet.com and EarthWeb.com networks.

Copyright 2003 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved.Legal
Notices, Licensing,
Reprints,
Permissions,
Privacy
Policy.

Click here!

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

[CTRL] Muhammad Found Guilty of All Charges

-Caveat Lector-



It is still not clear if they are going to call Muhammad's friend who 
loaned him the murder weapon as a witness. - Jim

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A51368-2003Nov17?language=printer




  
  


  

  

  

  

  

  
   
  
  
washingtonpost.com 
Muhammad Found Guilty of All Charges Jurors 
to Weigh Life or Death During Trial's Penalty Phase 
By Tamara JonesWashington Post Staff WriterMonday, 
November 17, 2003; 5:34 PM 

VIRGINIA BEACH, Nov. 17 -- John Allen Muhammad was convicted Monday of 
murder, terrorism and other charges that could send him to death row for his 
role in the Washington area sniper shootings last year.
The 42-year-old Muhammad stood with hands clasped before him, biting his 
lower lip as the foreman repeated the word "guilty" four times. 
The seven-woman, five-man panel returned the verdict after approximately 6 
1/2 hours of deliberation, finding Muhammad guilty of two counts of capital 
murder, conspiracy and illegal use of a firearm. 
The penalty phase of the trial began after jurors returned from lunch. 
Assistant Prince William Commonwealth's Attorney Richard A. Conway told 
jurors they had ample evidence to execute Muhammad. 
"Even if you didn't hear another soul testify, you certainly already heard 
enough" to deliver the death penalty, Conway said in the prosecution's opening 
statement. 
Conway promised to present evidence about a 
shooting in Washington state that predated the sniper siege, and told jurors 
they would hear about Muhammad's alleged access to two handguns and a rifle not 
tied to the Washington-area rampage.
Conway referred to Muhammad's "callous attitude toward human life" and notes 
purportedly found in his stolen laptop computer and his car outlining plans for 
future attacks. "We reserve the death penalty for the worst of the worse," 
Conway told the jurors. "Folks, he still sits right in front of you without a 
shred of remorse."
Defense attorney Jonathan Shapiro acknowledged that jurors would "put John 
Muhammad in a box of one kind or another. One is made of concrete; one is made 
of plywood." 
He urged jurors to see another side of Muhammad, a person he described as "a 
friendly guy, a solid, hard-working man who loved his children. John Muhammad 
was a human being." 
Shapiro recounted how Muhammad grew up in New Orleans in a family so poor 
they couldn't afford pain medication for his mother, who died of breast cancer 
when Muhammad, born John Williams, was three years old. In high school, Muhammad 
joined the ROTC and proudly wore his uniform to school "virtually every day. He 
loved that uniform," Shapiro said. Muhammad joined the National Guard and later, 
the Army.
But after failures in his life mounted and Muhammad lost his marriage, his 
children and his business, the convicted sniper eventually found himself living 
in a homeless shelter in Tacoma, Wash.
Shapiro promised jurors they would meet others from that shelter who found 
inspiration in Muhammad and credited him with a "spiritual wakening."
"Is he irretrievable, worthless, not worth our time?" Shapiro asked. "Or is 
there some reason to spare him?"
"It is not necessary," he concluded, "to extinguish one more life."
After both sides concluded their brief opening statements, the prosecution 
began calling witnesses to buttress the argument that Muhammad deserves to 
die.
First on the stand was Isa Nichols, a former 
accountant for Muhammad's car-repair business and friend of his ex-wife, 
Mildred.
Nichols's 21-year-old niece, Keenya Cook, was fatally shot in the face Feb. 
16, 2002, when she opened the door to her aunt's home in Tacoma. 
Prosecutors said they would link that slaying to 
Muhammad, who they allege was seeking revenge because Nichols had sided with his 
ex-wife in their divorce and bitter custody dispute.
Nichols also testified about accompanying Mildred Muhammad to a court hearing 
when her children were returned to her 17 months after Muhammad abducted them 
and fled to Antigua.
Nichols said Mildred Muhammad was so frightened of her ex-husband that she 
sought refuge in a sheriff's lounge after seeing him in the courthouse hall that 
morning. After losing parental rights, Nichols said, an "angry" Muhammad 
appeared in the hallway where Mildred Muhammad was making a phone call.
"Mildred dropped the telephone and ran down the corridor" as Muhammad started 
"coming toward her," Nichols said.
Attorneys bustled Mildred Muhammad and her friend into a cab, she added.
Nichols said Mildred Muhammad feared her former husband.
"Mildred felt he was going to destroy her," she testified.
Prosecutors suggested earlier in the trial that the sniper shootings were a 
smoke-screen by Muhammad and that his intended target ultimately was Mildred, 
who was living in the D.C. area with the children. 
The accountant later recounted the evening months later when she came home to 
find her niece, Keenya Cook, lying on

[CTRL] Investigators say pilot error to blame for crash that killed Sen. Wellstone

-Caveat Lector-



Yeah, Sure. That doesn't explain why the plane wastwo 
milesoff the landing pattern. - JR

http://www.tribnet.com/24hour/politics/v-printer/story/1058256p-7426288c.html


  
  

  


  The News Tribune - Tacoma, WA
  

Tuesday, November 18, 2003  
  


  
  
  


  
   
Back to Regular Story Page 
  

  

  
  
Investigators say pilot error to blame for 
  crash that killed Sen. Wellstone 
  By LESLIE MILLER, Associated Press 
  WASHINGTON (AP) - Pilot error caused the plane crash that killed Sen. 
  Paul Wellstone, D-Minn., and seven others, investigators said Tuesday. 
  Investigators told the National Transportation Safety Board that the 
  twin-propeller King Air A100 stalled when it slowed down too quickly while 
  approaching Eveleth-Virginia Municipal Airport in northern Minnesota on 
  Oct. 25, 2002. The plane lost altitude, veered sharply, sheared off 
  treetops and crashed 2 1/2 miles short of the runway. 
  "The flight crew did not monitor and maintain minimum speed," NTSB 
  Aircraft Performance Group Chairman Charlie Pereira told the board, which 
  will vote on whether to accept the finding. 
  Wellstone; his wife, Sheila; their 33-year-old daughter, Marcia 
  Wellstone Markuson; three campaign workers and the pilot and co-pilot 
  died. They were traveling to a funeral. 
  The crash occurred less than two weeks before Election Day. Following 
  Wellstone's death, former Vice President Walter Mondale accepted the 
  Democratic candidacy. After a brief campaign, Republican Norm Coleman won 
  the seat Wellstone had held for nearly 12 years. 
  On the day of the crash it was cloudy and cold. Crash investigators 
  looked at the possibility icing on the wings contributed to the accident, 
  but discounted that and focused instead on pilot Richard Conry, 55, and 
  co-pilot Michael Guess, 30. 
  John Clark, the NTSB's director of aviation safety, said Conry and 
  Guess were flying too high and too fast as they began their approach. They 
  slowed down too much as they tried to make up for the mistake, he said. 
  The plane went from 190 mph to 87 mph in the final 90 seconds of the 
  flight. 
  It's unclear why the pilots didn't realize the plane was moving too 
  slowly. "One of them should have been monitoring the instruments," said 
  Bill Bramble, a human performance investigator for the NTSB. 
  Interviews conducted after the crash revealed shortcomings in the 
  proficiency of both pilots, investigators said. (Published 
  11:01AM, November 18th, 2003) 
  
  


  
  General Info: Privacy Policy | 
User 
Agreement | Contact Us 

  
  The Interactive Media Division of The News 
Tribune © 2002 
Tacoma News, Inc.1950 South State Street, Tacoma, Washington 
98405 253-597-8742Fax Machines:  
Newsroom, 253-597-8274   Advertising, 
253-597-8764Send comments to the Webmaster at [EMAIL PROTECTED].- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - - - - - - - -Tacoma News, Inc. is a subsidiary of The McClatchy 
Company










www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

[CTRL] Friend Illegally Bought Rifle for Muhammad

-Caveat Lector-



At last a name, but not from the local papers. This raises all kinds of 
questions. Will Dancy be prosecuted?However, this does not explain the 
Bushmaster. It was a Remington Dancy bought for Mohammad, so he says. What 
happened to the Remington?Should Dancy be considered an accessory to 
murder (Keenya Cook's)? Stay tuned.- Jim

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A56352-2003Nov18?language=printer





  
  


  

  

  

  

  

  

  
washingtonpost.com 
Friend Illegally Bought Rifle for Muhammad 
By Tamara JonesWashington Post Staff WriterTuesday, 
November 18, 2003; 2:16 PM 

VIRGINIA BEACH, Nov. 18--A sailor who shared his vast gun collection with 
John Allen Muhammad and illegally purchased a rifle for the buddy now convicted 
of capital murder testified Tuesday in the penalty phase of the Washington-area 
sniper's trial.
Earl Lee Dancy Jr., an active-duty Navy gunner's mate, told jurors now 
holding Muhammad's life in their hands about his friend's keen interest in guns, 
his admiration for Adolf Hitler and his pride in the marksmanship of the 
teenager who posed as his son.
"He's a sniper," Dancy recalled Muhammad saying of Lee Boyd Malvo as the two 
adults examined a target Muhammad's accused accomplice riddled with bullet holes 
at a shooting range in Tacoma, Wash., where Muhammad was then living.
Malvo is standing trial for capital murder in nearby Chesapeake, Va., in the 
shooting spree that left 10 people dead and three wounded in the Washington area 
13 months ago. Muhammad was found guilty of capital murder and related charges 
Monday and now faces either life in prison or death by lethal injection.
Dancy said he knew it was against the law when he purchased a Remington 
700-308 rifle for Muhammad at a Tacoma sporting goods store, and acknowledged 
that he lied to police and the FBI when they later questioned him about the 
weapon, which Dancy had meanwhile reported stolen at Muhammad's behest.
Muhammad and Malvo stayed at Dancy's apartment for periods of time, Dancy 
said, and the two houseguests had free access to the gun collection Dancy kept 
in his bedroom closet.
Muhammad also showed interest in a book about silencers that later 
disappeared from Dancy's house. The houseguests also had videos about snipers, 
which they frequently watched, he said.
Dancy's testimony followed that of a Tacoma man who found the Remington on a 
bipod along a trail one night with a scope on it, pointing toward a nearby 
apartment. Muhammad's request that Dancy report his Remington stolen came around 
the same time the stranger found the gun with a single bullet in the chamber and 
turned it over to police.
Dancy admitted under cross-examination that he had told multiple lies to 
authorities investigating the sniper case, but said he "didn't know" if he had 
been offered a plea bargain to avoid charges and possible prison time in 
exchange for his testimony.
Dancy also testified fleetingly about Muhammad's bitter relationship with his 
former wife, Mildred, mother of his three young children.
Muhammad told him "she caused him to lose everything, and he was going to fix 
her," Dancy said.
Prosecutors have suggested that Muhammad orchestrated the sniper spree to 
create a smokescreen, and that Mildred, then living in the Washington area, was 
ultimately his intended target. The motive, they allege, was revenge over his 
loss of parental rights to the children.
But jurors now left to decide whether to impose the death penalty against 
Muhammad have been hearing testimony during this penalty phase not about the 16 
shootings that led to their guilty verdict, but about a killing far away and 
long before the D.C.-area rampage.
A young mother who opened her front door to a shotgun blast on Feb. 16, 2002, 
in Tacoma became the latest bloodied face of death for jurors who have been 
immersed for over a month in images of violence and voices of anguish.
The 21-year-old was found dead in the front foyer of her aunt Isa Nichols's 
home, where she lived with her infant daughter. Nichols had kept the books for 
Muhammad's car-repair business at one point, and had become a friend of Mildred 
Muhammad. She had sided with Mildred during the Muhammad's bitter divorce, after 
Muhammad spirited away the couple's children.
She was in court with Mildred again 18 months later, when authorities found 
and returned the children to their mother. Nichols testified Monday that she 
watched Mildred Muhammad screaming and running down the courtroom hallway to 
flee an angry Muhammad after that hearing. 
Testimony about the slaying of Keenya Cook underscored the horror of random 
violence, of death unexplained, that the greater Washington metropolitan area 
would come to know intimately eight months later, when Muhammad prowled the 
streets in a decrepit Chevrolet Caprice modified into a sniper's lair.
Keenya Cook, in her stocking feet, was poaching chicken on the

[CTRL] U.S. destroys suspected guerrillas' homes

-Caveat Lector-

If they can remove the non-combatants, couldn't they just capture the
guerrillas? - JR

http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/special_packages/iraq/7279154.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

Posted on Mon, Nov. 17, 2003

U.S. destroys
suspected guerrillas' homesBy JEFF
WILKINSONKnight Ridder
Newspapers
TIKRIT, Iraq - In a tactic reminiscent of
Israeli crackdowns in the West Bank and Gaza, the U.S. military has
begun destroying the homes of suspected guerrilla fighters in Iraq's
Sunni Triangle, evacuating women and children, then leveling their
houses with heavy weaponry.
At least 15 homes have been destroyed in Tikrit as part of what
has been dubbed Operation Ivy Cyclone II, including four leveled on
Sunday by tanks and Apache helicopters that allegedly belonged to
suspects in the Nov. 7 downing of a Black Hawk helicopter that
killed six Americans.
Family members at one of the houses, in the village of al Haweda,
said they were given five minutes to evacuate before soldiers opened
fire.
The destruction of the homes is part of a sharp crackdown on
insurgents in the so-called Sunni Triangle where guerrillas have
downed at least two U.S. helicopters, one a Chinook in Fallujah on
Nov. 2, killing 16 U.S. soldiers, and the other the Nov. 7 downing
of the Black Hawk. On Saturday, two more helicopters crashed, after
one of them may have been fired upon, killing 17.
U.S. forces struck dozens of targets on Monday, killing six
guerrillas and arresting 21 others, the military said. The operation
is expected to continue through Wednesday, said Col. James Hickey,
commander of the 1st Brigade of the 4th Infantry Division.
Hickey said the four homes were destroyed on Sunday because enemy
fighters lived and met there. Leveling the homes will force the
fighters to find other meeting places, he said.
"Those four people used those houses as sanctuary, and we're not
allowing them to have sanctuary," Hickey said.
"We're going to turn the heat up and complicate their
battlefield," driving them into the desert, he said. "There they
will be exposed and we will have them."
It was unclear whether the decision to destroy the houses was
part of an overall strategy approved in Washington. White House
spokesman Scott McClellan declined to comment specifically,
referring questions about the razings to the Defense Department, but
he praised the military's efforts to get tough with Iraqi
insurgents.
``There are terrorists who are seeking to spread fear and chaos
in Iraq, and we are on the offensive and taking the fight to the
enemy,'' McClellan said. ``Our coalition forces are doing an
outstanding job working with Iraqis to bring these terrorists to
justice.''
Officials at the Department of Defense referred questions to
Central Command in Tampa, which oversees all military operations in
Iraq. Spokesmen there declined to comment.
On Monday, angry residents of al Haweda, where three of the
destroyed homes were, said the tactic will spawn more guerrilla
fighters and perhaps spark an Iraqi uprising similar to the
Palestinian intifada in the West Bank and Gaza.
"This is something Sharon would do," said 41-year-old farmer
Jamel Shahab, referring to the Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon.
"What's happening in Iraq is just like Palestine."
Shahab stood amidst the rubble of the former home of 55-year-old
farmer Omar Khalil, who was arrested shortly before the home was
destroyed. The military said Khalil's son, who escaped, is one of
the suspects in the downing of the Black Hawk.
Khalil's wife, Kafey, sat wailing near her wrecked house. "I have
no son. I have no husband. I have no home. I will be a beggar."
Kafey Khalil said military officials first visited the house two
days ago, demanding that her husband turn in her son. He
refused.
Then at about 10 p.m. Sunday, the military returned, she
said.
"They started shouting at us, `Get

Re: [CTRL] U.S. destroys suspected guerrillas' homes

2003-11-18 Thread Prudy L

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 11/18/2003 3:46:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Posted on Mon, Nov. 17, 2003
U.S. destroys suspected guerrillas' homesBy JEFF WILKINSONKnight Ridder Newspapers
TIKRIT, Iraq - In a tactic reminiscent of Israeli crackdowns in the West Bank and Gaza, the U.S. military has begun destroying the homes of suspected guerrilla fighters in Iraq's Sunni Triangle, evacuating women and children, then leveling their houses with heavy weaponry.

Anybody care to join me in a chorus of "Proud to be an American"? Prudy
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
inline: spacer.gifinline: spacer.gif

[CTRL] JFK, 9/11 and Conspiracy Theories (Maureen Farrell)

Title: JFK, 9/11 and Conspiracy Theories - Maureen Farrell at BuzzFlash.com
-Caveat Lector-

http://www.buzzflash.com/farrell/03/11/far03002.html

November 18, 2003

MAUREEN FARRELL
ARCHIVES

JFK, 9/11 and Conspiracy Theories
by Maureen Farrell
"There have been many things swept under the
carpet. And I think it's a shame in a government that you trust - I think
it's a shame, the things that they chose to tell you and the things they
choose not to tell you." -- Sept. 11 widow Julia Sweeney, whose
husband Brian worked in the World Trade Center
"One of my greatest shames, as a journalist is
that I still don't know who killed Jack Kennedy." -- Hunter S.
Thompson
Last January, Mike Ward compared the post-9/11
conspiracy frenzy to what occurred in the aftermath of JFKs murder.
"Angry speculation -- focused mainly on government dirty dealings,
ulterior motives, and potential complicity in the attacks -- has risen to
a clamor that easily rivals what followed the Kennedy assassination," he
wrote. [Alternet.org]
Inconsistencies in the official story always take
their toll, particularly when there's a whiff of a cover-up. And
certainly, news that the White House will edit sensitive documents before
handing them over to the independent commission investigating Sept. 11
makes matters murkier. "The White House gets to cherry-pick how much
access the nation's commission looking into 9/11 gets to crucial
documents. I'm ready to vote for subpoenas right now," former Senator Max
Cleland told CNN, evoking Warren Commission suspicion deja vu.
While it's not surprising, as a New York
Times/CBS poll revealed, that 77 percent of Americans reject the
Warren Commission's findings, it seems that several government officials
did, too. Richard Nixon, for example, said that the Warren Commission was
"the greatest hoax that has ever been perpetuated," [BBC] while Bill Clinton reportedly asked Webster Hubble
to find answers to two questions: "One, who killed JFK? And, two, are
there UFOs?"
Of course, without history's hindsight, nobody knows
if 9/11 questions will capture the public's imagination the way those
surrounding John F. Kennedy's assassination have. And while some, like
Tucker Carlson, continue to disparagingly refer to "grassy knoll
conspiracy theories," a quick glance at this week's TV listings shows
exactly how enduring (and widely believed) such theories are.
Though ABC plans to commemorate the 40th anniversary
of JFKs assassination by "irrefutably" confirming that Lee Harvey Oswald
acted alone, other offerings include FOXs JFK: Case Not Closed,
The Discovery Channel's Unsolved History: JFK Conspiracy, Court
TVs JFK Assassination: Investigation Reopened and Cinemaxs airing
of Oliver Stones JFK. Starting Nov. 18, The History Channel is
featuring Nigel Turners The Men Who Killed Kennedy series,
offering nine hours of individual conspiracy segments over the course of
three nights. And on Sun. Nov. 23, theyll air JFK and the Grassy
Knoll, with Kennedy assassination authors Gerald Posner, Mark Lane and
David Lifton debating new evidence, which, the listing explains,
"concludes that there may have been another gunman on the grassy knoll."

Although there are at least 36 different JFK
conspiracy theories, part of the lasting allure of the Kennedy saga lies
in the fact that new information keeps bubbling to the surface. It seems
that while some fibs (like Condi Rice's assertion that nobody imagined
planes being used as weapons) are uncovered early on, others take longer
to unravel. It took nearly 40 years and a team of British forensic
scientists, for example, to conclude, with 96.3% accuracy, there was most
likely a second gunman on the grassy knoll ("Study Backs Theory of 'Grassy
Knoll,'" the Washington Post, March 25, 2001).
Postcards from the Bushy Knoll
While ex-British minister Michael Meacher has openly
wondered if 9/11 wasnt conveniently allowed to happen to pave the way for
US global domination [The Guardian], its doubtful that a majority of
Americans entertain such claims. During a May, 2003 Hardball
appearance, for example, political humorist Bill Maher reflected what
seems to be prevailing attitude towards JFK and Sept. 11 theories.
Uttering a confounded "wow" after Chris Matthews admitted, "I believe in
the single bullet theory," Maher nevertheless balked when an audience
member suggested that Bush might have purposely

[CTRL] Get Ready To Invade Iran!

-Caveat Lector-

 AP Exclusive: Top Iraqi Scientist Flees
 By DAFNA LINZER, Associated Press Writer

 The Iraqi scientist who headed Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s
 long-range missile program has fled to neighboring Iran, a country
 identified as a state sponsor of terrorism with a successful missile
 program and nuclear ambitions, U.S. officers involved in the weapons
 hunt told The Associated Press.

 Dr. Modher Sadeq-Saba al-Tamimi's departure comes as top weapons
 makers from Saddam's deposed regime find themselves eight months out
 of work but with skills that could be lucrative to militaries or
 terrorist organizations in neighboring countries. U.S. officials have
 said some are already in Syria and Jordan.

 Experts long feared the collapse of Saddam's rule could lead to the
 kind of scientific brain-drain the United States tried to prevent as
 the former Soviet Union collapsed. But the Bush administration had no
 plan for Iraqi scientists and instead officials suggested they could
 be tried for war crimes.

 There are a couple hundred Iraqis who are really good scientists,
 particularly in the missile area, said Jonathan Tucker, a former
 U.N. inspector now with the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at
 the Monterey Institute in California. In the chemical and biological
 areas, their work wasn't state of the art but it was good enough to
 be of interest to other countries.

 Only now is the State Department exploring the possibility of a
 government-funded program to block a scientific exodus and prevent
 Iraqis from doing future research in weapons of mass destruction.
 Initial cost estimates for the program run about $16 million,
 according to a Nov. 3 draft proposal obtained by AP.

 Two members of the Pentagon (news - web sites)'s Defense Intelligence
 Agency involved in questioning scientists in custody told AP the
 Iraqis continue to deny the existence of illicit weapons programs in
 Iraq (news - web sites). Dozens of Iraqi scientists have been
 questioned and less than 30 remain in custody. All of them, including
 senior members of Saddam's regime, have been subjected to lie-
 detector tests, which have come up clean on weapons questioning, the
 DIA officers said.

 But U.S. scientists and weapons experts, who all spoke on condition
 of anonymity, said they're having trouble finding some Iraqi experts
 in Iraq and have no way of tracking ones they've met.

 They could leave Baghdad tomorrow and we'd never know, said one
 senior official involved in the hunt. Very few are obligated to tell
 us where they're going or what they're up to.

 U.N. inspectors spoke with Dr. Modher in Baghdad a week before the
 U.S.-led war began on March 20. Two U.S. weapons investigators say
 they believe he crossed the Iraq-Iran border on foot at least two
 months after U.S. forces took Baghdad.

 His activities in Iran are unclear and may explain why his
 disappearance hasn't been publicly disclosed. The CIA (news - web
 sites) declined to discuss its efforts with Iraqi scientists or
 identify individuals.

 Thought to be in his mid-50's, the Czech-educated scientist
 specialized in missile engines. He met numerous times with U.N.
 inspectors during the 1990s and earlier this year when he argued that
 the Al-Samoud missile system under his command wasn't in violation of
 a U.N. range limit. The inspectors determined otherwise when tests
 showed it could fly more than 93 miles. They quickly began destroying
 the Iraqi stock, much to his frustration.

 Dr. Modher was declared by Iraq to have been one of the principal
 figures in their missile programs, said Ewen Buchanan, spokesman for
 the U.N. inspectors.

 In the late 1980s, Modher headed up the Iraqi military's Project
 1728, part of an effort to produce engines for longer-range missiles.

 He was the protege and favored colleague of Iraqi Lt. Gen. Hussein
 Kamel, Saddam's right-hand man and son-in-law who briefly defected to
 Jordan in 1995. There, Kamel told U.N. inspectors during
 interrogations about his work and Dr. Modher's efforts to build a
 missile powerful enough to strike most major European cities.

 According to the interrogation transcripts, Kamel said Modher and a
 nuclear physicist named Mahdi Obeidi both took work and documents
 from their offices. U.N. inspectors investigated the claim but found
 nothing.

 In July of this year, Obeidi gave the CIA a stack of papers and a
 piece of equipment that had been buried in his backyard for 12 years.
 In return, he has become the only Iraqi scientist allowed to move to
 the United States since the beginning of the U.S. occupation.

 Other than Obeidi, who is living along the East Coast with his
 family, another scientist known to have left the country is Jaffar al-
 Jaffer who founded Iraq's nuclear program in the 1980s. He's in the
 United Arab Emirates, where U.S. troops are stationed, and has been
 questioned by U.S. and British intelligence officials.

 But Jaffar, like a handful of

[CTRL] Bush Administration plan to reduce global warming could

-Caveat Lector-

- Forwarded message from Mark Graffis [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:26:01 -0600 (CST)
From: Mark Graffis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Mark Graffis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Bush Administration plan to reduce global warming could

Bush Administration plan to reduce global warming could devastate sea life
 Public release date: 17-Nov-2003

Contact: Todd McLeish
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
401-874-7892
University of Rhode Island

Bush Administration plan to reduce global warming could devastate sea life
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-11/uori-bap111703.php

URI marine biologist says CO2 injection in deep sea would alter ocean
chemistry, affect numerous creatures
KINGSTON, R.I. -- November 17, 2003 -- A Bush Administration proposal to
mitigate the effects of global warming by capturing carbon dioxide emissions
from power plants and injecting it into the deep sea could have disastrous
effects on sea life, according to a University of Rhode Island researcher.
Brad Seibel, assistant professor of marine biology at URI, said that while
the Administration's plan is still in the experimental stage, enough is
already known about the biology of marine organisms to say with certainty
that the plan will harm the marine environment in significant ways.
Increased CO2 in the oceans would result in decreases in the pH levels (the
measure of acidity) of seawater, resulting in dramatic physiological effects
on many species, Seibel said. Shallow-living organisms like shelled mollusks
and corals are already being affected by the growing levels of CO2 in the
atmosphere. As atmospheric CO2 diffuses into the upper layers of the water,
it inhibits the ability of shellfish to form shells and causes coral reefs
to dissolve.
Deep-sea creatures are even more sensitive to environmental changes, he
said. In some species, their metabolism would become suppressed and lead to
retarded growth and reproduction, while others would be unable to transport
oxygen in their blood.
CO2 injection would be detrimental to a great many organisms, said the URI
biologist. It would kill everything that can't swim fast enough to get out
of the way, because in concentrated form it's highly toxic, even to humans.
But the Department of Energy seems willing to sacrifice the animals of the
deep sea if it will stop global warming. That's not entirely unreasonable
considering that if we keep stalling on taking serious measures to reduce
global warming, we won't be able to do anything about it. But I'd still like
to see that we're doing everything else possible to reduce emissions before
we begin polluting the deep-sea.
The government's carbon sequestration plan is designed to collect carbon
dioxide emissions that would otherwise be released into the atmosphere and
store them in underground geologic formations or deep in the ocean. Energy
Secretary Spencer Abraham announced in September the creation of seven
regional partnerships to establish the framework needed to develop the
necessary technologies and put them into action. In addition, the Bush
Administration convened a Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum last June
where energy ministers from 13 countries discussed the potential for CO2
injections around the globe.
In the new book Climate Change and Biodiversity, published in August, Seibel
and co-author Victoria Fabry wrote: From the perspective of marine
organisms, deep-ocean sequestration means concentrating an otherwise dilute
toxin to well above lethal levels, and placing it in an environment where
the organisms are less tolerant of environmental fluctuation in general and
CO2 in particular.Localized devastation of biological communities at the
injection sites is certain.
As seawater becomes acidified, growth rates of calcareous phytoplankton
(those with calcium carbonate shells) will be reduced as a result of the
effects of CO2 on the process of calcification. Metabolism in some animal
species may also be depressed by increased acidity. Furthermore, some fish,
squids, and shrimps will have a diminished capacity for oxygen uptake at the
gill and transportation through their bloodstream, leading to asphyxiation.
Seibel said that there is typically a natural exchange of CO2 between the
sea and the atmosphere, but increases of atmospheric CO2 are already
affecting the equilibrium. Intentional injections of CO2 will further
disrupt the ecosystem.
The carbon dioxide-carbonate system is arguably the most important chemical
equilibria in the ocean, Seibel and Fabry wrote. It influences nearly
every aspect of marine science, including ecology and, ultimately, the
biodiversity of the oceans.
Brad Seibel, assistant professor of marine biology in the University of
Rhode Island's Department of Biological Sciences, joined the URI faculty in
the summer of 2003 after having worked as a marine ecologist at the Monterey
Bay Aquarium Research Institute in Monterey, Calif. for several years. He
received undergraduate and

[CTRL] Voiding the Palestinians

-Caveat Lector-

On October 29, 2003, a leading Israeli daily, Haaretz, reported a rape-
murder that occurred more than fifty years ago at Nirim, an Israeli
military outpost in the Negev. The victim was a Palestinian girl, in her
early or mid-teens, or younger; the perpetrators of this crime were members
of the Israeli Defense Force. Six days later, The Guardian also reported
this crime, but US papers did not think this was news that is fit for
print. In the United States, the media prefers to shield Israel from
adverse notice. What is the significance of a single rape-murder in the
long and tortuous history of the dispossession of one people by another?

See:
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles9/Alam_Voiding-Palestinians.htm

*

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

[CTRL] Utilities, Oil Companies Stand to Benefit from GOP Energy Bill