Re: [CTRL] JFK Jr, sacrifice for Joe's deal with the devil?

1999-07-22 Thread SCIO-LTD

 -Caveat Lector-

Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing
that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the
water under the earth.
Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy
God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children
unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;  And shewing
mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments
exodus 20:03-6

Jeffrey C Hearon

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 1999 11:30 PM
Subject: [CTRL] JFK Jr, sacrifice for Joe's deal with the devil?


 -Caveat Lector-

 Someone I know suggested this as a possible theory behind the murder of
JFK,
 Bobby, and now JFK Jr.  It seems to me that Joe had some inside knowledge
 always working for him, like his ability to sell short before the
depression
 and his avoidance of the law in his bootlegging.  Is it possible that the
 children are paying for the sins of the father, in that it was required of
 Joe that he sacrifice his sons to the big D. or some other
 occultic/conspiracy/illuminati/etc. group?
 Just a thought.

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing!  These are sordid
matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor
effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] [[CTRL] Scientists Offer Explanation for Alien Abductions]

1999-07-07 Thread SCIO-LTD

 -Caveat Lector-

The correct term for this sleep paralysis "phenomena" is cataplectic [sp]
hallucinations.  It can be induce with various botanicals must notably bella
dona or nightshade plant. Cataplectic hallucinations can also be induced
electromagnetically ELF or scalar wave technology.

- Original Message -
From: Robert Tatman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 1999 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] [[CTRL] Scientists Offer Explanation for Alien
Abductions]


 -Caveat Lector-

 "Taylor, John (JH)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 snip
   Those who believe in alien abductions deny that sleep paralysis
   could be behind it all. John E. Mack, a Harvard University Medical
   School professor who is the most prominent defender of the
   possibility of abductions, argues that sleep paralysis simply does
   not fit the evidence. He notes that at least a few abduction
   reports come from remote places where people are not exposed to
   movies or tales of U.F.O.'s, and that many happen in daylight and
   involve people who seem to have been awake and alert.
 
   Other defenders of abduction theories say aliens may be clever
   enough to use sleep paralysis in their kidnappings.
 
 snip

 "But, Professor, the facts don't agree with your hypothesis!"
 "So much the worse for the facts..."

 Interesting what you can see when you finally take the blinkers off.

 Bob



 =
 Robert F. Tatman
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Remove "nospam" from the address to reply.

 NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
 distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
 receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For

 more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 POSTING THIS MESSAGE TO THE INTERNET DOES NOT IMPLY PERMISSION TO SEND
 UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL E-MAIL (SPAM) TO THIS OR ANY OTHER INTERNET
ADDRESS.
 RECEIPT OF SPAM WILL RESULT IN IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION OF THE SENDER'S ISP.

 
 Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com.

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing!  These are sordid
matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor
effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-10 Thread SCIO-LTD

 -Caveat Lector-

 This is NOT capitalism.

 You too ... why is it everyone desires to label things as
 such they are not?

Oh yea, who seemest to correct an inconsistency, I have not label nor have I
call a subsidy capitalism, from whence do derive such a conclusion form my
statements? And yes subsidies are an insidious feature of capitalism,
but it is not capitalism per se, and as such is a clearly axiomatic
conclusion.


Jeffrey C Hearon
Founder  CEO
SCIO-LTD
http://www.scio-ltd.net
http://www.scio-ltd.com
http://www.scio-ltd.org

- Original Message -
From: M.A. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.


 -Caveat Lector-

 SCIO-LTD wrote:
 The subsidies are often indirect through the granting of
 minor or major monopolies, (for a good example see the
 history of ATT, and the monopoly they had for well over
 a half a century).The government often has a dual
 use/dual purpose agenda in these areas, with strong
 linkages between industry, academia, and government.


 This is NOT capitalism.

 You too ... why is it everyone desires to label things as
 such they are not?

 Regard$,
 --MJ


 One of the sublimest things in the world is plain truth.
  -- Edward Bulwer-Lytton

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing!  These are sordid
matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor
effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-10 Thread SCIO-LTD

 -Caveat Lector-

Let me address some of your false conclusions as follows nurev:  (and let's
dispense with the puerile value judgements, "You get a little self serving
here don't you buddy?" )

[Without competition to balance greed, the system is sold under false
pretenses.]

the system is sold under false pretenses?  Utter nonsense! competition in no
way balances greed, indeed competition is the result of greed and is its
active force in commerce.


[Adam Smith who made the case that with  competition the system benefits
all, and, without competition we are  simply destined for some form of
slavery. Smith made clear that without competition the system is merely an
oinkfest for oinkers and wanabe oinkers. He didn't much like businessmen. He
saw them as greedy, conspiratorial, and obsessed with money. Some things
never change.]

Adam Smith, that racist communist, read Anton Chaitkins Treason in
America  from Aaron Burr to Averall Harriman, for a detail treatment on
the heretical pronouncement this fool made and how his writings have became
a tool to propagandize the opposite of what he seems to stand for, the
statement above is a non-sequiter, that doesn't address the what the
relationship between competition and business. As for businessman being
greedy, conspiratorial, and obsessed with money, indeed some are, but as
with most generalized statements it is patently wrong.  There has always
been that breed of merchantislist (which is who Adam Smith was addressing
here who sought to out right monopolies everything.)


[No??? Why no? Does this make capitalism good?]

There needs to be a distinction between an aspect or attribute of capitalism
and its core tenets.
Monopolies are not capitalism but are a feature of it in the global economy,
there are private as well as governmental monopolies.   The most obvious and
glaring example of  monopolist action which stifles innovation is the
electric utility industry which is on the verge of technological
obsolescence, which is raking up enormous profits while actively suppressing
innovation.go figure.

[ Wrong. Sheer greed has ALWAYS been the driver of capitalism.]
bullocks, bullshit, balderdash, complete sheer and utter crap.
Greed is not the driver of capitalism, you would impute that wealth
formation is an evil activity, it is only is when the rights of others are
violated in its acquisition.Wealth is good and desirable.   However most
people including yourself it seems confuse wealth with mal intent.
Obviously, wealth has been use to cartelize the world economy, it has been
use to prohibit the free exchange of ideas to other nations, it has been use
to subjugate and use the common and natural resource for a foreign gain. Is
wealth or its formation a bad thing.   I say no a thousand times.
Remember it is the love of money, and not money itself which is the root of
all evil.


[That's right. Pet rocks, hair in a can, minimum wages, externalization of
costs, and a petroleum based automotive industry 100 years old which will
not change as long as capitalists have the oligopoly in the oil industry.
That's innovation baby. What % of innovations are really advances for
humanity? I don't know. Vare to guess?]

The fact that we can communicate our ideas is an advance. Pet rocks,
hair in a can? Who gives a fuck? (you're more intelligent than that: aren't
you).minimum wages, yadda, yadda yadda,  features of some capitalist,
not capitalism.  Let me clear the cobwebs from your understanding.   The
computer industry alone, is responsible for a great deal of innovation and
material benefit.% wise, who knows, why ask a question you can't
yourself quantify, unless you are speaking rhetorically?

[ I am assuming here that folks agree that monopoly is a baaad thing.]
Absolutely categorically agree with you.

[What bullshit! People don't eat information. You get a little self-serving
here don't you buddy? The internet has promise in several areas, none of
which are necessary for sustaining life.]

Did I say people eat information?   What a fantastic leap in logic you've
accomplished.  I sorry you can't understand what is patently understandable.
People thrive on information, data and intelligence, yes it is necessary to
life, schools, training institutes and news agencies, the government
(unfortunately the largest producer of information), businesses; media,
entertainment all feed an open mind.  It is the driver for wealth
acquisition. If I know something then I am in a position to act on it.
This fact was known a long time ago.   Remember man shall not live by bread
alone but every word that proceedith out of the mouth of God.




Jeffrey C Hearon
Founder  CEO
SCIO-LTD
http://www.scio-ltd.net
http://www.scio-ltd.com
http://www.scio-ltd.org

- Original Message -
From: nurev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 12:13 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-10 Thread SCIO-LTD

 -Caveat Lector-

This piece alone deserves posting:

nurev wrote to SCIO-LTD:
[The internet has promise in several areas, none of
which are necessary for sustaining life.]

Think again.


Digital Society

Internet Whacks $2 Billion Off Merrill Lynch

by Clay Shirky

THE INTERNET HAPPENED to Merrill Lynch last week, and it cost them a
couple billion dollars -- when Merrill announced its plans to open an
online brokerage after years of deriding the idea, its stock price
promptly fell by a tenth, wiping out $2 billion in its market
capitalization. The internet's been happening like that to a lot of
companies lately -- Barnes and Noble's internet stock is well below its
recent launch price, Barry Diller's company had to drop its Lycos
acquisition because of damage to the stock prices of both companies, and
both Borders and Compaq dumped their CEOs after it became clear that
they were losing internet market share. In all of these cases, those
involved learned the hard way that the internet is a destroyer of net
value for traditional businesses because the internet economy is
fundamentally at odds with the market for internet stocks.
The internet that the stock market has been so in love with (call it the
"Pretend Internet" for short) is all upside -- it enables companies to
cut costs and compete without respect to geography. The internet that
affects the way existing goods and services are sold, on the other hand
(call it the "Real Internet"), forces companies to cut profit margins,
and exposes them to competitors without respect to geography. On the
Pretend Internet, new products will pave the way for enormous
profitability arising from unspecified revenue streams. Meanwhile, on
the Real Internet, prices have fallen and they can't get up. There is a
rift here, and its fault line appears wherever offline companies like
Merrill tie their stock to their internet offerings. Merrill currently
pockets a hundred bucks every time it executes a trade, and when
investors see that Merrill online is only charging $30 a trade, they see
a serious loss of revenue. When they go on to notice that $30 is
something like three times the going rate for an internet stock trade,
they see more than loss of revenue, they see loss of value. When a
company can cut its prices 70% and still be three times as expensive as
its competitors, something has to give. Usually that is the company's
stock price.

The internet is the locus of the future economy, and its effect is the
wholesale transfer of information and choice (read: power and leverage)
from producer to consumer. Producers (and the stock market) prefer
one-of-a-kind businesses who can force their customers to accept
continual price increases for the same products. Consumers, on the other
hand, prefer commodity businesses where prices start low and keep
falling. On the internet, consumers have the upper hand, and as a
result, anybody who profited from offline inefficiencies -- it used to
be hard work to distribute new information to thousands of people every
day, for example -- are going to see much of their revenue destroyed
with no immediate replacement in sight.

This is not to say that the internet produces no new value -- on the
contrary, it produces enormous value every day. Its just that most of
the value is concentrated in the hands of the consumer. Every time
someone uses the net to shop on price (cars, plane tickets, computers,
stock trades) the money they didn't spend is now available for other
things. The economy grows even as profit margins shrink. In the end,
this is what Merrill's missing market cap tells us -- the internet is
now a necessity, but there's no way to use the internet without
embracing consumer power, and any business which profits from
inefficiency is going to find this embrace more constricting than
comforting. The effects of easy price comparison and global reach are
going to wring inefficiency (read: profits) out of the economy like a
damp dishrag, and as the market comes to terms with this equation
between consumer power and lower profit margins, $2 billion of missing
value is going to seem like a drop in the bucket.

Clay Shirky is Professor of New Media at Hunter College.

Feed Magazine, June 8, 1999


Jeffrey C Hearon
Founder  CEO
SCIO-LTD
http://www.scio-ltd.net
http://www.scio-ltd.com
http://www.scio-ltd.org
+1.917.553.7217

- Original Message -
From: Kris Millegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 10:52 AM
Subject: [CTRL] OEN 6/10/99


 -Caveat Lector-

 from:
 http://www.aci.net/kalliste/
 A HREF="http://www.aci.net/kalliste/"The Home Page of J. Orlin
Grabbe/A
 -
 Today's Lesson From The Outsider

 by Colin Wilson


 They are all asleep. This is the point to which Gurdjieff returns again
 and again. They must be made to feel the urgency of the need to wake up.
  And after the legend of the magician,

Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.

1999-06-09 Thread SCIO-LTD

 -Caveat Lector-

As a technology professional with over tens years Internet experience, I can
testify to William Hugh Tunstall comments.   The subsidies are often
indirect through the granting of  minor or major monopolies, (for a good
example see the history of ATT, and the monopoly they had for well over a
half a century).The government often has a dual use/dual purpose agenda
in these areas, with strong linkages between industry, academia, and
government.

Capitalism does not thrive on competition, on the contrary the false
Darwinian construct of competition seeks to explain market forces, price
patterns as the justification of arcane economic mechanism is simply
derived non-sense.

Capitalism seeks to aggregate resources, and to wipe out threats to
expanding growth of competitors or monopolize energy, whether it be in the
form of money, information, food, fuel, or other raw material.   However
monopolistic forces wipeout innovation because there is no incentive.

Does this make capitalism bad?  No, just its false and widely practice
Darwinist credo which has slowly inculcated the modern economic thinking.
Innovation has always been the driver of capitalism, it like saying that
water is necessary for life.   William Baumol's bullshit  announcement
smacks of fascination with  the obvious. Innovation has always been the
great inducer of capital, which is patently obvious to most casual observer.

It should not be surprising that firms sign strategic partnerships with
their competitors seeing that their innovations will ultimately fuel their
own innovations.

As Peter Drucker said nearly ten years ago"International economic theory is
obsolete, the traditional factors of production land, capital and labor are
constraints rather than driving forces, only information has become the one
true factor of production,  it underlies the most powerful and  radical
transformation in the global economy."A la Internet!


Jeffrey C Hearon
Founder  CEO
SCIO-LTD
http://www.scio-ltd.net
http://www.scio-ltd.com
http://www.scio-ltd.org

- Original Message -
From: William Hugh Tunstall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Revising Capitalism/ rebuttal.


 -Caveat Lector-

 Much of the R and D in high tech industries is funded by
 the
 taxpayers...  We have NASA, NSA, Livermore, MIT, the mammoth defense
 contractors..  Silicon Valley has had its share of government
 subsidies..

 So the argument that market forces (capitalism) are responsible for high
 tech innovations is false.  When "the invisible hand" stays invisible,
 government comes to the rescue.   Read the essay, "Cyberselfish" for a
 more balanced view.

 On Sun, 6 Jun 1999, nurev wrote:

   -Caveat Lector-
 
  6/6/99
 
  No matter what changes and inovations Capitalism goes through, there
  always
  remains the deadly constants.
 
  1- Private ownership of large amounts of capital ALWAYS causes
  concentration
  of wealth into few hands. With that ALWAYS comes control and
  exploitation
  of society.
 
  2- Capitalism, like cancer, is defined by growth. The ecology of the
  planet
  can no longer tolerate systems based on waste and growth.
 
  3- Capitalism is theft. Its success depends on how much the capitalist
  can
  steal from the worker on one end, and the buyer on the other.
 
  4- Capitalism causes mental illness in the form of addiction to money.
 
  5- No Capitalist is really supportive of competition. Competition is
  wasteful and chancy. Monopoly is the true aim of capitalists.
 
  Joshua2
 

=
  "Taylor, John (JH)" wrote:
  
-Caveat Lector-
  
   New York Times
   June 5, 1999
  
   Revising Capitalism: Coorperative Innovation Steals Competition's Thun
der
   By MICHAEL M. WEINSTEIN
  
Capitalism, every undergraduate student of economics learns,
thrives on competition. The brilliant virtue of the invisible
hand
of competition is that it forces firms to reduce costs, cut
prices
and thereby enrich consumers. This engaging tale has buttressed
every economics narrative since Adam Smith lucidly explained more
than 200 years ago how competition channels the natural greed of
individuals into serving the social good.
  
Now William Baumol, an economics professor at New York
University,
wants to rewrite the basic tale. Yes, competition creates wealth.
But in his new formulation, price cutting becomes a sideshow.
Innovation takes center stage as the "primary weapon of
competition." And the key to innovation is a clever form of
collaboration among rivals.
  
Innovation, the process of translating inventions and new ideas
into commercial products, is largely responsible fo

Re: [CTRL] CIA field worker spooks my Group

1999-05-19 Thread SCIO-LTD

 -Caveat Lector-

"american spook "
now.. . just how did you out this spook?

Jeffrey C Hearon

- Original Message -
From: Andrew Hennessey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 1999 5:19 PM
Subject: [CTRL] CIA field worker spooks my Group


 -Caveat Lector-

 hi,

 we had an american spook at our group last night disguised
 as an international hippy brother called Gandalf.
 He said that the american people loved Clinton.
 He said that men [like Clinton] had a right to come on to girls
 and that Clinton had done no wrong.
 he said the stat that 1 in 4 american children go to bed hungry
 is an old statistic.
 He said that America is a Rich country where almost everyone is wealthy.
 He said  the UN has no power in the USA and no control over
 National Guard and Federal Authorities.
 He said that the FEMA camp stuff was just bad rumours about old
 Japanese POWW2 camps
 He said that the UN has no power to enforce programmes like
 Echelon 2000, UNESCO/WHO healthy Start, healthy person etc.
 That America is defended by its Constitution.
 That the legislation in Colorado that makes Christianity deviant from
 the norm is a false rumour - because it violates the freedoms in the
 Constitution.
 He said that if the World had had unlimited free energy, we would
 have made the world hotter by using it greedily - that the Human Race
 needed careful management and guidance.
 That so much healthy population would have been created by the resulting
 free energy civilisation that we would all be living in boxes because
 of overcrowding [no space colonies] .. etc etc

 Should I pass on any information from his fellow americans in case this
 guy is just a lonesome tourist missing news of Uncle Sam 


 I'll be glad to pass on your comments to him  :)
 please mark mail for:gandalf


 Andrew Hennessey
 Transformation Studies Group
 Edinburgh   Scotland

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing!  These are sordid
matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor
effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] A Century of Spies

1999-03-22 Thread SCIO-LTD

 -Caveat Lector-

Let's clear this up once and for all.  Marconi stole the patents,
(resubmitted Tesla's patents after implimentation as his own).   In 1943
after Tesla's death "Marconi's patents" were reverted, and Tesla's patents
were acknowledged.   This is common knowledge to electrical engineers, and
patent historians.

Marconi sought to monoplize Tesla's technology. He almost suceeded with
the founding of RCA which was founded exclusively to "generate revenues from
patent royalties."This was not the first or last time Tesla's technology
was appropriated.Tesla, and John Westinghouse establiched the first AC
powered central power station using his famous poly phased alternating
current technology.Elihu Houston was using Tesla's technology in his
frim, (without royalty consideration), which he sold out to Edison who with
JP Morgan formed GE (General Electric).Study your history, the
foundation for all the energy monopolies, (yes communication is a form of
energy), were laid our about a hundred years ago.

The tradegy of Tesla, who was a naturalized American citizen is that his so
called benefactors sought at every turn to manipulate the current
opportunities, and his technology to their exclusive advantage. Caveat
inventor.

Jeff Hearon
Founder  CEO
SCIO-LTD
http://www.scio-ltd.net
http://www.scio-ltd.com
http://www.scio-ltd.org
-Original Message-
From: Howard R. Davis III [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, March 22, 1999 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] A Century of Spies


 -Caveat Lector-

Kris Millegan wrote:

  -Caveat Lector-

 from:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/a_centur.htm
 A HREF="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
 srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/a_centur.htm"WashingtonPost.com: A
Century of
 Spies /A
 -
 A Century of Spies
 By Jeffrey T. Richelson

 Chapter One: A Shady Profession




 During an 1895 vacation in the Italian Alps Marconi read a scientific
 paper which suggested to him that it might be possible to transmit
 signals through the air, rather than through wires. His enthusiasm for
 the idea led him to cut short his holiday and return to his top-floor
 laboratory--a spare room--at the Villa Griffone.

 Initial experiments seemed to indicate that while communication was
 possible, the range was limited to 100 yards or so at most. But Marconi
 discovered that raising the antenna to new heights resulted in a
 dramatic extension of range. On June 2, 1896, Marconi applied for the
 world's first patent for wireless telegraphy, which was quickly granted.
 On March 2, 1897, he filed the complete specifications and less than
 five months later the Wireless Telegraph and Signal Company opened, with
 the objective of developing the Marconi device commercially. A
 successful demonstration in August, witnessed by the king and queen of
 Italy, led to the Italian navy's adoption of Marconi's system. In
 October, he was able to establish communications between Salisbury and
 Bath, thirty-four miles apart.


Actually, what he had done was not simply realize that larger attennas.
This did not extend the reach of the signal very greatly. Rather he was
able to obtain information from Tesla's patents to make the thing work.

Howard Davis

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid
matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor
effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Ho