[CTRL] Who's Paying for That Latte?

2002-12-16 Thread Euphorian
-Caveat Lector-

http://worldpress.org/Europe/786.cfm

From the December 2002 issue of World Press Review (VOL. 49, No. 12)

Crisis in a Coffee Cup

Who's Paying for That Latte?

Phil Pennington, The Press (conservative), Christchurch, New Zealand, Sept. 23, 2002

Are coffee drinkers being ripped off, or is their habit ripping off

Hong Kong, Oct. 30, 2002: Vendi Arelia (top), an Indonesian, helps launch an Oxfam
campaign to highlight disparities in growers' prices for coffee and the price 
consumers pay
(Photo: Antony Dickson/ AFP).
others? The answer is a bit of both. When Lyn Savill sits down for a latte at her 
favorite
café, Roasted Addiction, a short hop from her work in Mount Roskill, Auckland, she 
resists a
pang, not of thirst but of conscience. She’s aware of the issue of coffee and price and
fairness—an issue paraded by Oxfam protesters leading donkeys laden with sacks of 
coffee
to the London Stock Exchange on Wednesday—but as a mere drinker, well, what can she or
anyone do?

“There’s no option. If you enjoy coffee you just have to go with it,” says Savill, 32, 
who
goes three times a week to cafés. “You can’t say, ‘Can I have a fair-trade coffee?’ 
They
don’t have it.”

Oxfam’s broadside against the perks of big business in a report titled “Mugged: 
Poverty in
Your Coffee Cup” is the latest push in its long campaign to get the world’s four huge 
buyers
of coffee beans—all multinationals, the biggest of which is Swiss food giant Nestlé—to 
pay
more. Otherwise the prospect looms of 25 million growers starving and many leaving 
their
land, and so making a shaky industry shakier.

New Zealand’s burgeoning number of café owners and coffee bean importers will insist 
that
they’re not part of the global squeeze on poor farmers, that they’re paying a high 
price for
top- grade coffee. Trade Aid campaign manager Simon Gerathy insists they are a part of
the problem— then again he has reason to, since his organization is in the coffee 
trade. It
has enlisted Kiwi celebrities, including actor Sam Neill and broadcaster Chris 
Laidlaw, to
push its certified “fair trade” coffee.

It’s in the supermarket, though, that the issue really brews down to. Here, the 
shopper not
only has little real choice but, according to the Consumers’ Institute, is paying too 
much
even for instant coffee. But Consumers’ Institute chief executive, David Russell, like 
Lyn
Savill, can only shrug about what to do. “We’re paying far too much for our coffee in
relation to what the grower gets,” says Russell.

“It’s well stitched-up internationally. The only realistic thing that the New Zealand 
consumer
can do is stop drinking coffee.”

Fat chance of that. New Zealanders are the new Italians of the south. We love coffee,
plowing through 150,000 big bags of green beans a year in cups of the “real stuff,” 
not to
mention piles of instant coffee powder (a lot of which is brought in ready-made from
overseas). But Oxfam’s research suggests we’re drinking deep from the cup of inequity.

“Developing-country coffee farmers, mostly poor smallholders, now sell their coffee 
beans
for much less than they cost to produce,” says the report from the British-based aid 
agency.
“Farmers sell at a heavy loss while branded coffee sells at a hefty profit. The coffee 
crisis
has become a development disaster.”

It says the big four coffee roasters, Nestlé, Kraft, Procter  Gamble, and Sara 
Lee—which
with German giant Tchibo buy almost half the world’s coffee beans each year—are making
big profits on coffee brands, each worth US$1 billion or more in annual sales. It 
estimates
Nestlé’s instant-coffee profit margin at 26 percent and Sara Lee’s at 17 percent—high 
in the
food and drink field.

Oxfam blames primarily a free-market system and poor countries being encouraged by the
World Bank and International Monetary Fund into cash crops like coffee, and away from
traditional agriculture. It is advocating a Coffee Rescue Plan and an international 
rescue
meeting in late Sept- ember. Its plan is that roaster companies pay farmers a decent 
price
and that stocks of coffee are cut partly by destroying at least 5 million bags. And it 
wants
roasters to promise to buy 2 percent of their beans under certified “fair trade” 
conditions.
Nestlé is suggesting the United States and Europe get rid of massive farm subsidies to
make it worthwhile for poor farmers to switch to other crops.

All in all, it’s enough to make that short black stick in your throat. But wait. As 
Oxfam notes,
and this country’s biggest supplier of beans to gourmet roasters, John Burton, is 
quick to
reinforce, it’s instant coffee that’s the real problem, not café coffee. “You see, a 
farmer
producing good-quality coffee is getting a much, much better return,” says Burton, 
whose
company, John Burton Ltd., imports 30,000 bags of green beans a year and supplies 70
mostly tiny coffee roasters nationwide. “But it’s the farmer producing just the 
average, low-
quality grounds that these people 

Re: [CTRL] Who's paying?

2000-12-05 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 12/04/2000 5:12:31 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 Who is paying for these lawyers representing gore/bush?
 Me and you? 

I'm not sure about Gore, since we all know he will not be our president, but
from what I know about the Bush family, I'm positive we will be paying all of
their bills forever more.  Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Who's paying?

2000-12-04 Thread Rob G

-Caveat Lector-

Who is paying for these lawyers representing gore/bush?
Me and you?
Rob

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om