Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-16 Thread Marilyn Wright

-Caveat Lector-

On 15 Jan 01, at 10:59, Nurev Ind Research wrote:

 Unstable weather ( by human standards ) IS the norm. But the changes
 are much quicker and more dramatic than people think. Ice core samples
 from Scandinavia have shown that the last three " climate flips " took
 only 20 years.

 We have grown up being taught that geological changes happen over long
 periods of time. SOME DO, AND SOME DON'T! There is now ample evidence
 to indicate that major climactic changes can happen within a human
 lifetime and even faster.

And what about those frozen mastodons who were found with
buttercups in their mouths? It would seem to caution that ice ages
and pole shifts can happen with amazing speed when the time and
conditions are right.




sno0wl

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-16 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

Marilyn Wright wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 On 15 Jan 01, at 10:59, Nurev Ind Research wrote:

  Unstable weather ( by human standards ) IS the norm. But the changes
  are much quicker and more dramatic than people think. Ice core samples
  from Scandinavia have shown that the last three " climate flips " took
  only 20 years.
 
  We have grown up being taught that geological changes happen over long
  periods of time. SOME DO, AND SOME DON'T! There is now ample evidence
  to indicate that major climactic changes can happen within a human
  lifetime and even faster.

 And what about those frozen mastodons who were found with
 buttercups in their mouths? It would seem to caution that ice ages
 and pole shifts can happen with amazing speed when the time and
 conditions are right.

 sno0wl

Ice ages don't happen fast enough to freeze mastodons. 20 years is what
I have seen studies on. As for Pole shifts, I can't quite accept them yet.

Frozen Mastodons with undigested food in their stomachs are really intriguing
though.

J2

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-15 Thread Johannes Schmidt III

-Caveat Lector-

On Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:18:52 -0500 Nurev Ind Research [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Caveat Lector-

1/16/01

This is obfuscation and drivel. All you need to know is that the ice caps
and the worlds glaciers are melting and sea level is rising. No assholes can
argue those measurements.


Well here is one 'asshole' who can dispute it. Are you familiar with the whole Du 
Pont/CFC scam? If the ice caps are melting (and it's a big 'IF'), big deal. 90% of the 
ice is below sea level. If ice is below sea level and melts, there is no net increase 
in the water level. Predictions of the seas rising dramatically are bunk.

Similarly the whole CFC scam. Ozone is O1, single oxygen molecules. Ozone is formed by 
the sun hitting the upper atmosphere and splitting the oxygen molecules into two. It's 
constantly being created naturally. The major thing which destroys it is jet 
aeroplanes, but you don't hear the big corporations behind the CFC scam asking for the 
banning of civil and military jets.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-15 Thread Nessie

-Caveat Lector-

90% of the ice is below sea level.

Source, please.

A HREF!ttp://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
ÝÝÝÚrchives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF!ttp://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF!ttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A
o subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send 
email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-15 Thread Dale Stonehouse

-Caveat Lector-

 90% of the ice is below sea level.

 Source, please.

No source should be necessary for a basic fact of physics that is
taught in every school. Or you can prove it yourself by putting an ice cube
into a glass of water and observing what happens. Put salt in the water
first if you want to more accurately simulate ocean waters.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-15 Thread Johannes Schmidt III

-Caveat Lector-

On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 04:07:21 -0800 Nessie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Check a geological survey of Antarctica or the arctic. Same with icebergs. the weight 
of the ice keeps 90% or more of it below water level. It's simple physics.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-15 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

-Caveat Lector-

From: "Johannes Schmidt III" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the ice caps are melting (and it's a big 'IF'), big deal.
90% of the ice is below sea level. If ice is below sea level
and melts, there is no net increase in the water level.
Predictions of the seas rising dramatically are bunk.

Faulty science (not to mention logic) there

While it is true that 90 percent of an iceberg is below water, it is also true that 
the percentage of what is
above and the percentage of what is below the surface of the water it floats on 
matters not a whit...

Because ice displaces 100 percent of its volume in water.  Try it with an icecube in a 
glass of water...the
moment you add the icecube, the level of the water rises in the glass.  When the 
icecube melts, the water
level doesn't change; it doesn't matter if 90 percent of the icecube was below water, 
or 80 percent or 70
percent...because 100 percent of the icecube displaced an equal amount of water.

But only a portion of the polar icecaps are comprised of free-floating icebergs; a 
good portion of the ice is
on land, and it is when THAT ice melts, that one has to worry about rising sea levels.

Also, you don't take into consideration what the effect of changing vast amounts of 
solid, frozen H2O into a
liquid, and ultimately gaseous, state would have upon the global weather system


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-15 Thread Nessie

-Caveat Lector-

  No source should be necessary for a basic fact of physics that is
taught in every school. Or you can prove it yourself by putting an ice
cube into a glass of water and observing what happens. Put salt in the
water  first if you want to more accurately simulate ocean waters.


That only applies to the sea ice. What about the ice on Greenland and
Antartica? What percent, exactly, of the polar ice is sea ice, and what
percent is on land? Give the volumn, not the surface area.

A HREF!ttp://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
ÝÝÝÚrchives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF!ttp://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF!ttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A
o subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send 
email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-15 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

John Cone wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 --- Ynr Chyldz Wyld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  -Caveat Lector-
 
  From: "Tenorlove" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "I have a hard time believing that there is global
  warming. Last year, here in New Jersey, winter
 stayed late, spring had below normal
   temperatures, we had no summer at all, just cool
  temps and tons of rain..."
 

 Nakano Comments:

 It is not a question of "Global Warming Yes or No?"
 The earth's climate is being modified...intentionally.
 It isn't CFC gasses.
 It isn't "greenhouse gasses".
 It isn't too many SUVs on the road.
 It isn't the burning of the rain forrests.
 And it isn't the long list of other things you
 read and hear about in the alleged News Media.

 The climate is being modified.
 Since it is a "closed system", when some areas
 are intentionally modified as to temperature and
 rainfall, other areas are affected as a
 consequence (which may be unintentional).

 We are definitely witnessing and experience
 unusual weather.  If you want to know why,
 do some reaearch into the writing and work of
 Dr. Nick Begich and Jean Manning and others
 who have written about HAARP and related
 technology.
  Nakano

Greenhouse gasses ARE the cause. What ever HARP is or isn't doing, it
can't account for climactic change. This is the height of human egocentrism.

What is happening now is normal. This has happened before and the records
exist in the ice core samples taken from various points on the planet.

The mechanisms for what is happening are being argued, not what is happening.

We as humans can prepare, or not.

Humans have survived ice ages before. They did so with virtually no technology.

We can do it too. But not if we continue with the status quo.
The most important first step is to move away from Capitalism and the so
called " free market system." IT IS THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF THE ACCELERATION OF
CLIMATE CHANGE. It is also the primary cause of the removal of trees. Trees
and other broad leafed quick growing plants are the best modifiers of CO2.

We can't change what's coming, but we can modify the results by adding or
removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Stopping fossil fuel usage IMMEDIATELY will
prevent the introduction of man made CO2. And, increasing broad leafed green
plants, will help REMOVE CO2. Both of these actions can dampen the effects
of the warming which will hopefully dampen the severity of the changes.

There's no way around it. And we are not talking about long time periods here.
Climate change IS NOW!

Joshua2

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-15 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

Ynr Chyldz Wyld wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 From: "Kelly" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Years ago I read a fascinating article by a geologist - oh, how I wish I
  kept it! - and he was saying that the geological record showed that the
  Earth, prior to 10,000 years ago, had a volitile weather system.  Then,
  he said, for some reason, for 10,000 years we have had stable weather
  systems, which he said had given man the stability needed to spread
  across the world and develop civilizations.  Then he said that this
  period of weather stability was ending.  I think he was right.

 Which is why I caution people not to go off half-cocked with theories regarding 
possible weather modification
 devices...

 While such devices may indeed exist and be functional, if one doesn't have DATA to 
assess, one can't make an
 intelligent conjecture regarding what is happening.

 What may seem 'abnormal' may in reality be very normal, just part of a greater 
pattern that the observer isn't
 aware of.

 So to say "The weather is very different than what I remember as a child" isn't very 
meaningful, because while
 in and of itself that may be true, it could be part of a pattern that lasts decades, 
or lasts hundreds of
 years...or thousands of years...

 We may very well be at the end of a cycle that lasts approximately 10K years...And 
perhaps this cycle only
 occurs infrequently, say once every 300K years...

 In which case, what is really 'abnormal' is the relatively stable weather we are 
used to...and an increase in
 the number of violent storms is actually more the 'norm'...

 June


The existing geological evidence shows that this is absolutely correct.

Unstable weather ( by human standards ) IS the norm. But the changes are
much quicker and more dramatic than people think. Ice core samples from
Scandinavia have shown that the last three " climate flips " took only
20 years.

We have grown up being taught that geological changes happen over long
periods of time. SOME DO, AND SOME DON'T! There is now ample evidence to
indicate that major climactic changes can happen within a human lifetime
and even faster.

Joshua2

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-15 Thread Aleisha Saba

-Caveat Lector-

Where is other 10% of ice?   must be that is why it is light at the top
and pyramid shapes?

So remember the Titanic for it was April when the icebergs were breaking
awayalways thougoht that iceberg was loaded.

Saba

Pyramids of ice?  Little pointy pieces of ice?
Ice cubes square - put pyramid in glass of water.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-15 Thread kl

-Caveat Lector-

On 15 Jan 2001, at 11:34, Aleisha Saba wrote:

 always thougoht that iceberg was loaded.


Huh???  What does this mean?

Blessed are those who expect nothing, for they shall not be disappointed.

   Jonathan Swift

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fw: Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-15 Thread Amelia

-Caveat Lector-

But June, doesn't freezing expand the volume  about 10%
causing water pipes to burst if frozen and a glass container
will break if the water inside freezes?  It could be from
air trapped inside the ice and would evaporate upon melting
not adding to the problem with rising ocean levels as it
would be dispensed into the atmosphere anyway.  But I was
just wondering about this in view of the other kinds of
freezing I have recently experienced with extreme weather.
Today it is 60+ degrees again.  Go figure.
Amelia


- Original Message -
From: "Ynr Chyldz Wyld" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false
data'??


 -Caveat Lector-

 From: "Johannes Schmidt III"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 If the ice caps are melting (and it's a big 'IF'), big
deal.
 90% of the ice is below sea level. If ice is below sea
level
 and melts, there is no net increase in the water level.
 Predictions of the seas rising dramatically are bunk.

 Faulty science (not to mention logic) there

 While it is true that 90 percent of an iceberg is below
water, it is also true that the percentage of what is
 above and the percentage of what is below the surface of
the water it floats on matters not a whit...

 Because ice displaces 100 percent of its volume in water.
Try it with an icecube in a glass of water...the
 moment you add the icecube, the level of the water rises
in the glass.  When the icecube melts, the water
 level doesn't change; it doesn't matter if 90 percent of
the icecube was below water, or 80 percent or 70
 percent...because 100 percent of the icecube displaced an
equal amount of water.

 But only a portion of the polar icecaps are comprised of
free-floating icebergs; a good portion of the ice is
 on land, and it is when THAT ice melts, that one has to
worry about rising sea levels.

 Also, you don't take into consideration what the effect of
changing vast amounts of solid, frozen H2O into a
 liquid, and ultimately gaseous, state would have upon the
global weather system


 June



A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-15 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

Johannes Schmidt III wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 On Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:18:52 -0500 Nurev Ind Research [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -Caveat Lector-
 
 1/16/01
 
 This is obfuscation and drivel. All you need to know is that the ice caps
 and the worlds glaciers are melting and sea level is rising. No assholes can
 argue those measurements.
 

 Well here is one 'asshole' who can dispute it. Are you familiar with the whole Du 
Pont/CFC scam? If the ice caps are melting (and it's a big 'IF'), big deal. 90% of 
the ice is below sea level. If ice is below sea level and melts, there is no net 
increase in the water level. Predictions of the seas rising dramatically are bunk.

 Similarly the whole CFC scam. Ozone is O1, single oxygen molecules. Ozone is formed 
by the sun hitting the upper atmosphere and splitting the oxygen molecules into two. 
It's constantly being created naturally. The major thing which destroys it is jet 
aeroplanes, but you don't hear the big corporations behind the CFC scam asking for 
the banning of civil and military jets.


I've heard about the CFC scam. That has nothing to do with what we are
talking about. Just focus on this.

The ice caps are melting. Glaciers are receding at an amazingly fast pace.
Inhabited islands in the Pacific are shrinking and their populations are
being forced to move because of the flooding.

Is this happening because it's getting colder or warmer?

That's all.

Joshua2

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Vs: Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-15 Thread Ole Gerstrøm

-Caveat Lector-

August 23, 2000
Contact: Jason L. Jenkins
Information Specialist
(573) 882-6217
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://web.missouri.edu/~news/releases/icesheet.html

GREENLAND ICE SHEET CHANGES ARE NORMAL; NO EVIDENCE OF LONG-TERM CLIMATE
CHANGES, RESEARCHERS SAY


COLUMBIA, Mo. - Almost three years ago, Curt Davis, a researcher at the
University of Missouri-Columbia, discovered that some areas of the southern
Greenland ice sheet varied dramatically in elevation over a 10-year period. An
extensive study by a team of scientists, including Davis, has now found that
normal weather patterns are the cause, not any long-term climate changes such as
global warming.

In a paper that will appear in the Aug. 24 edition of Nature, Davis and his co
investigators will report that changes in the ice sheet's upper elevations,
areas above 6,000 feet, are caused by natural variations in snow accumulation
over time.

"When we released our original findings, they were somewhat controversial," said
Davis, an associate professor of electrical engineering who has been using
remote-sensing satellites to study changes in the ice sheet since 1990. "Our
data indicated that overall, the ice sheet was maintaining a constant elevation,
but we found great variability over short distances, with substantial thickening
in some areas and strong thinning in other areas."

Shortly after his study was released, Davis and a group of researchers led by
Joe McConnell, an associate research professor at the Desert Research Institute
in Reno, Nev., joined together to investigate the cause of the variability in
elevation.

Using ice cores, each 45 to 400 feet deep, that were collected from 12 locations
around the southern Greenland ice sheet above 6,000 feet, the researchers
measured variations in the concentrations of dust and chemical compounds such as
hydrogen peroxide, calcium and ammonium. The researchers used this analysis to
determine the amount of snow that accumulated each year over the time span of
the cores.

"Analyzing ice cores is similar to studying tree rings," Davis said. "Just as
the distance between a tree's rings represents its growth that year, the amount
of ice between layers of certain compounds indicates that year's accumulation in
that location."

Ice core analysis and modeling revealed that areas where elevation changed
dramatically had a corresponding variation in snowfall during the study period.
Further analysis indicated these snowfall variations were consistent with
natural fluctuations over decades. This proves the elevation changes across
southern Greenland that Davis discovered in his earlier study were not unusual.

Just last month, two other studies were reported that support Davis and his co
investigators' findings. These studies also found that, overall, the ice sheet's
upper elevations were relatively stable. However, one of these studies found
that most of the lower elevations of the ice sheet were thinning rapidly, with
rates exceeding three feet a year in some locations along the edges.

"Although there doesn't appear to be any changes in southern Greenland's upper
elevations that can be associated with global warming, dramatic lower elevation
thinning has been documented," Davis said. "While this thinning seems to have
had no effect on the upper elevations so far, more study is needed to determine
its cause and the possible impact on the ice sheet's contribution to sea-level
rise in the future."

Other universities who participated in the study include: the University of
Washington, Ohio State University, the University of Arizona and the University
of Nebraska. Funding was provided by grants from NASA and the National Science
Foundation.


-30-
Robert F. Tatman
Information Technology Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jenkintown, PA, USA
*Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.*

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance-not soap-boxing-please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'-with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds-is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-14 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

-Caveat Lector-

From: "Tenorlove" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I have a hard time believing that there is global warming. Last year,
 here in New Jersey, winter stayed late, spring had below normal
 temperatures, we had no summer at all, just cool temps and tons of
 rain, this winter came early, and I'm sitting here listening to my
 furnace run continuously. Maybe the rest of the world is warm and
 sunny, but I'm not convinced. And if there is global warming, please
 send me some.

It is a fallacy (and a sign one has not done any research into the matter) to believe 
that global warming will
result in a uniform warming and dryness throughout the world...

While some areas indeed will find their overall temps higher, and some areas will find 
their overall
precipitation lower, other areas will find that their temps are lower, usually due to 
increased cloud cover --
increased cloud cover which implies increased precipitation.

So while some areas may brag about how balmy their winters are, other areas in the 
snow belt will find that
temperatures are lower due to increased cloud cover -- which means more snow, which 
means even lower temps, as
thermal radiation is reflected back to space due to the snow cover.

Think about it...if the overall world temp is higher, that means more of the moisture 
in the oceans and lakes
is evaporating; and that increased moisture will result in increased precipitation in 
certain geographical
areas.  Increased precipitation means increased cloud cover.  Increased cloud cover 
means LOWER overall temps
for that areawhile on a global scale, the temps are increasing...


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-14 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

-Caveat Lector-

From: "Kelly" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Years ago I read a fascinating article by a geologist - oh, how I wish I
 kept it! - and he was saying that the geological record showed that the
 Earth, prior to 10,000 years ago, had a volitile weather system.  Then,
 he said, for some reason, for 10,000 years we have had stable weather
 systems, which he said had given man the stability needed to spread
 across the world and develop civilizations.  Then he said that this
 period of weather stability was ending.  I think he was right.

Which is why I caution people not to go off half-cocked with theories regarding 
possible weather modification
devices...

While such devices may indeed exist and be functional, if one doesn't have DATA to 
assess, one can't make an
intelligent conjecture regarding what is happening.

What may seem 'abnormal' may in reality be very normal, just part of a greater pattern 
that the observer isn't
aware of.

So to say "The weather is very different than what I remember as a child" isn't very 
meaningful, because while
in and of itself that may be true, it could be part of a pattern that lasts decades, 
or lasts hundreds of
years...or thousands of years...

We may very well be at the end of a cycle that lasts approximately 10K years...And 
perhaps this cycle only
occurs infrequently, say once every 300K years...

In which case, what is really 'abnormal' is the relatively stable weather we are used 
to...and an increase in
the number of violent storms is actually more the 'norm'...



June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-14 Thread John Cone

-Caveat Lector-

--- Ynr Chyldz Wyld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -Caveat Lector-

 From: "Tenorlove" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "I have a hard time believing that there is global
 warming. Last year, here in New Jersey, winter
stayed late, spring had below normal
  temperatures, we had no summer at all, just cool
 temps and tons of rain..."


Nakano Comments:

It is not a question of "Global Warming Yes or No?"
The earth's climate is being modified...intentionally.
It isn't CFC gasses.
It isn't "greenhouse gasses".
It isn't too many SUVs on the road.
It isn't the burning of the rain forrests.
And it isn't the long list of other things you
read and hear about in the alleged News Media.

The climate is being modified.
Since it is a "closed system", when some areas
are intentionally modified as to temperature and
rainfall, other areas are affected as a
consequence (which may be unintentional).

We are definitely witnessing and experience
unusual weather.  If you want to know why,
do some reaearch into the writing and work of
Dr. Nick Begich and Jean Manning and others
who have written about HAARP and related
technology.
 Nakano

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-14 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

Kelly wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 Tenorlove wrote:

  I have a hard time believing that there is global warming. Last year,
  here in New Jersey, winter stayed late, spring had below normal
  temperatures, we had no summer at all, just cool temps and tons of
  rain, this winter came early, and I'm sitting here listening to my
  furnace run continuously. Maybe the rest of the world is warm and
  sunny, but I'm not convinced. And if there is global warming, please
  send me some.
 
  Tenorlove
  freezing

 Years ago I read a fascinating article by a geologist - oh, how I wish I
 kept it! - and he was saying that the geological record showed that the
 Earth, prior to 10,000 years ago, had a volitile weather system.  Then,
 he said, for some reason, for 10,000 years we have had stable weather
 systems, which he said had given man the stability needed to spread
 across the world and develop civilizations.  Then he said that this
 period of weather stability was ending.  I think he was right.

 Isn't it awful when you lose track of a great article?  Sorry that I
 can't cite it - perhaps someone on the list has heard this theory and
 can share?

 Kelly


Kelly,

What you are referring to is the " interglacial " period of an ice age.
We are now, and have always been living in an ice age.

The cycle runs as follows: 100,000 years.( More or less.)

90,000 years are in a glacial period; where the world climate is cold.
10,000 years are in interglacial; where the temperature warms. It is during
this period that plant life expands dramatically in the biosphere.

It's not that the interglacial is stable which is important to us, but
that it is WARM and stable. The climate is very stable during the glacial
period. And, for longer periods of time.

The climate IS changing. THAT is what is important. We have reached the end
of the interglacial period. Humans didn't cause this phenomenon. It is a
natural cycle. This means that environmentalists ( I consider myself one )
are simply wrong if they blame humans. They are trying to make reality
fit their ideology. But their intent is right on. While human doings don't
actually CAUSE the climactic changes, the do influence them. That means that
human activity in the use of fossil fuels are ACCELERATING the process of
warming which is part of the natural cycle, instead of doing the opposite. We
should be decelerating the process until we can figure out what humanity
needs to do to survive the changes successfully.

The MAIN REASON for the acceleration of the warming changes is the continued
use of fossil fuels, and modern agricultural methods.  THE MAIN REASON  we
continue these methods are because of the type of economic system we have
and its imposition on the rest of humanity THROUGH GLOBALIZATION.

Capitalism and its motivation of greed, together with its concentration of
wealth and power into the hands of those who own and run corporations, ARE
THE BIGGEST OBSTACLE TO MAKING THE CHANGES WE MUST MAKE TO SURVIVE IN THE
NEW CLIMATE.

There is no point to separating your garbage while businessmen pay workers
to cut down trees for profit, and Big Oil and car making corporations continue
to profit from fossil fuels.

This is the REAL bottom line.

Joshua2

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-14 Thread John Cone

-Caveat Lector-

--- Nurev Ind Research [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

The climate IS changing. THAT is what is important. We
have reached the end of the interglacial period.
Humans didn't cause this phenomenon. It is
a natural cycle. This means that environmentalists
( I consider myself one )
are simply wrong if they blame humans."
__
Nakano Comments:
You're right about the "end of the interglacial
period" and that the long cycles of climate
change are naturally occuring.
However at this time there is a completely
new causative factor in the equation.
This new factor is "Scalar Technology".
This technology has the capacity to
"steer" the jetstreams and major ocean currents.
In fact it is being used for this purpose.
Thereforethose who blame humans for the
climatic changes are correctbut for the
wrong reasons.
 Nakano

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-14 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

1/16/01

This is obfuscation and drivel. All you need to know is that the ice caps
and the worlds glaciers are melting and sea level is rising. No assholes can
argue those measurements.

For years, the tobacco industry was able to sell their poison without
interference because they could create a " climate of doubt," even though
the medical profession knew the effects of smoking.

This is a common tactic of capitalists. For some strange reason ONLY absolute
proof of horror is acceptable before society can make the evil fuckers stop
killing for profit.

There is no doubt about global warming.

None!

Joshua2
==

DIG alfred webre wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 Are there any comments or retorts to this controversial report?
 ==
 LONDON TELEGRAPH   Jan. 14, 2001
 Global warming claims 'based on false data'
 By Robert Matthews

 FRESH doubt has been cast on evidence for global warming following the
 discovery that a key method of measuring temperature change has exaggerated
 the warming rate by almost 40 per cent.

 Studies of temperature records dating back more than a century have seemed to
 indicate a rise in global temperature of around 0.5  C, with much of it
 occurring since the late 1970s. This has led many scientists to believe that
 global warming is under way, with the finger of blame usually pointed at
 man-made pollution such as carbon dioxide.

 Now an international team of scientists, including researchers from the Met
 Office in Bracknell, Berkshire, has found serious discrepancies in these
 temperature measurements, suggesting that the amount of global warming is
 much less than previously believed.

 The concern focuses on the temperature of the atmosphere over the sea, which
 covers almost three quarters of the Earth's surface. While scientists use
 standard weather station instruments to detect warming on land, they have
 been forced to rely on the crews of ships to make measurements over the vast
 ocean regions.

 Crews have taken the temperature by dipping buckets into the sea or using
 water flowing into the engine intakes. Scientists have assumed that there is
 a simple link between the temperature of seawater and that of the air above
 it.

 However, after analysing years of data from scientific buoys in the Pacific
 that measure sea and air temperatures simultaneously, the team has found no
 evidence of a simple link. Instead, the seawater measurements have
 exaggerated the amount of global warming over the seas, with the real
 temperature having risen less than half as fast during the 1970s than the
 standard measurements suggest.

 Reporting their findings in the influential journal Geophysical Research
 Letters, the scientists say that the exact cause of the discrepancy is not
 known. One possibility is that the atmosphere responded faster than the sea
 to cooling events such as volcanic eruptions.

 The findings have major implications for the climate change debate because
 the sea temperature measurements are a key part of global warming
 calculations. According to the team, replacing the standard seawater data
 with the appropriate air data produces a big cut in the overall global
 warming rate during the last 20 years, from around 0.18C per decade to
 0.13C.

 This suggests that the widely-quoted global warming figure used to persuade
 governments to take action over greenhouse gases exaggerates the true warming
 rate by almost 40 per cent. The team is now calling for climate experts to
 switch from seawater data to sea-air temperature measurements.

 One member of the team, David Parker, of the Hadley Centre for Climate
 Prediction and Research at the Met Office, said that the discovery of the
 discrepancy "shows we don't understand everything, and that we need better
 observations - all branches of science are like that". Yet according to Mr
 Parker, the new results do not undermine the case for global warming: "It is
 raising questions about the interpretation of the sea-surface data."

 Even so, the findings will be seized on by sceptics as more evidence that
 scientists have little idea about the current rate of global warming, let
 alone its future rate. Climate experts are still trying to explain why
 satellites measuring the temperature of the Earth have detected little sign
 of global warming - despite taking measurements during supposedly the warmest
 period on record.

 Some researchers suspect that the fault may again lie with the ground-based
 temperature measurements. They say that many of the data come from stations
 surrounded by growing urban sprawl, whose warmth could give a misleading
 figure. A study of data taken around Vienna, Austria, between 1951 and 1996
 found that the air temperature rose by anything from zero to 0.6C, depending
 on precisely where the measurements were made.

  __
 EcoNews Service - Always online for Exopolitics  a Universe Ecology.
 EcoNews http://www.ecologynews.com/
 Prague  

Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-14 Thread John Cone

-Caveat Lector-

--- Nurev Ind Research [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -Caveat Lector-

 1/16/01

 This is obfuscation and drivel. All you need to know
 is that the ice caps and the worlds glaciers are
melting and sea level is rising. No assholes can
 argue those measurements.
___

Nakano Comments:

No argument here. The question is:
"WHY"?
Why are the ice caps and glaciers melting?

CFCs and "Greenhouse gasses" are a cover story
The real cause is something very different.
You are not going to hear about it on
the evening TV news.
 Nakano


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-14 Thread M.A. Johnson

-Caveat Lector-

Joshua
  This is obfuscation and drivel. All you need to know
  is that the ice caps and the worlds glaciers are melting
  and sea level is rising. No assholes can argue those
  measurements.
MJ
Are you describing WHAT you are writing?
This 'sky is falling' Global Warming is being chanted
by the SAME people who proclaimed Global Cooling in
the 1970s ... with the SAME goals.

The ACTUAL temperature data does NOT support this 'obfuscation
and drivel' (as you describe Global Warming) ... it is
various models -- read guesses -- that is at its base.

Regard$,
--MJ

If present trends continue, the world will be about four
degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990,
but eleven degrees colder by the year 2000...This is
about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age.
 -- Kenneth E.F. Watt on air pollution and global cooling,
 Earth Day 1970.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-14 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

"M.A. Johnson" wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 Joshua
   This is obfuscation and drivel. All you need to know
   is that the ice caps and the worlds glaciers are melting
   and sea level is rising. No assholes can argue those
   measurements.
 MJ
 Are you describing WHAT you are writing?
 This 'sky is falling' Global Warming is being chanted
 by the SAME people who proclaimed Global Cooling in
 the 1970s ... with the SAME goals.

 So what?


 The ACTUAL temperature data does NOT support this 'obfuscation
 and drivel' (as you describe Global Warming)

Obfuscation and drivel is describing the article QUESTIONING global
warming. Not global warming. Pay attention here.

 ... it is
 various models -- read guesses -- that is at its base.

 Regard$,
 --MJ

 If present trends continue, the world will be about four
 degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990,
 but eleven degrees colder by the year 2000...This is
 about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age.
  -- Kenneth E.F. Watt on air pollution and global cooling,
  Earth Day 1970.

So what?

J2

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-14 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

John Cone wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 --- Nurev Ind Research [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  -Caveat Lector-
 
  1/16/01
 
  This is obfuscation and drivel. All you need to know
  is that the ice caps and the worlds glaciers are
 melting and sea level is rising. No assholes can
  argue those measurements.
 ___

 Nakano Comments:

 No argument here. The question is:
 "WHY"?
 Why are the ice caps and glaciers melting?

I do know why, and it IS because of greenhouse gasses.

J2


 CFCs and "Greenhouse gasses" are a cover story
 The real cause is something very different.
 You are not going to hear about it on
 the evening TV news.
  Nakano

 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
 http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

 A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
 screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
 sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
 directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
 major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
 That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
 always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
 credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
  A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
  A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-14 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

John Cone wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 --- Nurev Ind Research [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The climate IS changing. THAT is what is important. We
 have reached the end of the interglacial period.
 Humans didn't cause this phenomenon. It is
 a natural cycle. This means that environmentalists
 ( I consider myself one )
 are simply wrong if they blame humans."
 __
 Nakano Comments:
 You're right about the "end of the interglacial
 period" and that the long cycles of climate
 change are naturally occuring.
 However at this time there is a completely
 new causative factor in the equation.
 This new factor is "Scalar Technology".
 This technology has the capacity to
 "steer" the jetstreams and major ocean currents.
 In fact it is being used for this purpose.
 Thereforethose who blame humans for the
 climatic changes are correctbut for the
 wrong reasons.
  Nakano

Sorry. I don't buy it.

j2

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-14 Thread Jayson R. Jones

-Caveat Lector-

In my field we use other indicators as to climate temps over time.  One
of the more important being records of ice in various parts of the world.
 From all I have seen there is a general warming pattern for the past
14,000 years.  Jayson
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001 21:31:42 EST DIG alfred webre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
-Caveat Lector-

Are there any comments or retorts to this controversial report?
==
LONDON TELEGRAPH   Jan. 14, 2001
Global warming claims 'based on false data'
By Robert Matthews

FRESH doubt has been cast on evidence for global warming following the
discovery that a key method of measuring temperature change has
exaggerated
the warming rate by almost 40 per cent.

Studies of temperature records dating back more than a century have
seemed to
indicate a rise in global temperature of around 0.5 ° C, with much of
it
occurring since the late 1970s. This has led many scientists to
believe that
global warming is under way, with the finger of blame usually pointed
at
man-made pollution such as carbon dioxide.

Now an international team of scientists, including researchers from
the Met
Office in Bracknell, Berkshire, has found serious discrepancies in
these
temperature measurements, suggesting that the amount of global warming
is
much less than previously believed.

The concern focuses on the temperature of the atmosphere over the sea,
which
covers almost three quarters of the Earth's surface. While scientists
use
standard weather station instruments to detect warming on land, they
have
been forced to rely on the crews of ships to make measurements over
the vast
ocean regions.

Crews have taken the temperature by dipping buckets into the sea or
using
water flowing into the engine intakes. Scientists have assumed that
there is
a simple link between the temperature of seawater and that of the air
above
it.

However, after analysing years of data from scientific buoys in the
Pacific
that measure sea and air temperatures simultaneously, the team has
found no
evidence of a simple link. Instead, the seawater measurements have
exaggerated the amount of global warming over the seas, with the real
temperature having risen less than half as fast during the 1970s than
the
standard measurements suggest.

Reporting their findings in the influential journal Geophysical
Research
Letters, the scientists say that the exact cause of the discrepancy is
not
known. One possibility is that the atmosphere responded faster than
the sea
to cooling events such as volcanic eruptions.

The findings have major implications for the climate change debate
because
the sea temperature measurements are a key part of global warming
calculations. According to the team, replacing the standard seawater
data
with the appropriate air data produces a big cut in the overall global
warming rate during the last 20 years, from around 0.18¡C per decade
to
0.13¡C.

This suggests that the widely-quoted global warming figure used to
persuade
governments to take action over greenhouse gases exaggerates the true
warming
rate by almost 40 per cent. The team is now calling for climate
experts to
switch from seawater data to sea-air temperature measurements.

One member of the team, David Parker, of the Hadley Centre for Climate
Prediction and Research at the Met Office, said that the discovery of
the
discrepancy "shows we don't understand everything, and that we need
better
observations - all branches of science are like that". Yet according
to Mr
Parker, the new results do not undermine the case for global warming:
"It is
raising questions about the interpretation of the sea-surface data."

Even so, the findings will be seized on by sceptics as more evidence
that
scientists have little idea about the current rate of global warming,
let
alone its future rate. Climate experts are still trying to explain why
satellites measuring the temperature of the Earth have detected little
sign
of global warming - despite taking measurements during supposedly the
warmest
period on record.

Some researchers suspect that the fault may again lie with the
ground-based
temperature measurements. They say that many of the data come from
stations
surrounded by growing urban sprawl, whose warmth could give a
misleading
figure. A study of data taken around Vienna, Austria, between 1951 and
1996
found that the air temperature rose by anything from zero to 0.6¡C,
depending
on precisely where the measurements were made.

 __
EcoNews Service - Always online for Exopolitics  a Universe Ecology.
EcoNews http://www.ecologynews.com/
Prague  http://mujweb.cz/www/ecologynews/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing
propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different 

Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-13 Thread Tenorlove

-Caveat Lector-

I have a hard time believing that there is global warming. Last year,
here in New Jersey, winter stayed late, spring had below normal
temperatures, we had no summer at all, just cool temps and tons of
rain, this winter came early, and I'm sitting here listening to my
furnace run continuously. Maybe the rest of the world is warm and
sunny, but I'm not convinced. And if there is global warming, please
send me some.

Tenorlove
freezing

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-13 Thread Kelly

-Caveat Lector-

Tenorlove wrote:


 I have a hard time believing that there is global warming. Last year,
 here in New Jersey, winter stayed late, spring had below normal
 temperatures, we had no summer at all, just cool temps and tons of
 rain, this winter came early, and I'm sitting here listening to my
 furnace run continuously. Maybe the rest of the world is warm and
 sunny, but I'm not convinced. And if there is global warming, please
 send me some.

 Tenorlove
 freezing

Years ago I read a fascinating article by a geologist - oh, how I wish I
kept it! - and he was saying that the geological record showed that the
Earth, prior to 10,000 years ago, had a volitile weather system.  Then,
he said, for some reason, for 10,000 years we have had stable weather
systems, which he said had given man the stability needed to spread
across the world and develop civilizations.  Then he said that this
period of weather stability was ending.  I think he was right.

Isn't it awful when you lose track of a great article?  Sorry that I
can't cite it - perhaps someone on the list has heard this theory and
can share?

Kelly

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Global warming claims 'based on false data'??

2001-01-13 Thread radman

-Caveat Lector-

The Global Warming Debate Is Over:
It's Real, Inexorable, and Headed Our Way
http://www.emagazine.com/september-october_2000/0900feat1.html
The verdict is in on climate change, and the news isn't good. Scientists
say the effects are already occurring, and much more quickly than they
projected even a few years ago. Has global warming begun? Seeking an
answer, E sent a team of journalists to 11 "hot spots" around the world.
Their mission: to document climate change and its consequences. What they
discovered is startling, and represents a profound call to action.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om