Re: Fwd: [IP] Gilmore bounced from plane; and Farber censors Gilmore's email

2003-07-21 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 11:36 PM 7/20/03 -0700, John Kozubik wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Steve Schear wrote:

 remove a small 1 button pinned to my left lapel.  I declined,
saying
 that it was a political statement and that he had no right to censor

 passengers' political speech.  The button, which was created by

Where do these ridiculous ideas come from ?  If I own a piece of
private
property, like an airplane (or an entire airline) for instance, I can
impose whatever senseless and arbitrary conditions on your use of it as
I
please.

Yes.
Except that you entered into a contract to transport a human in exchange

for money.  No where in the contract was banned speech mentioned.

Suppose that instead two men were kicked off a flight for holding hands,

or a woman  offspring for breast-feeding.  That would be a violation of
the transportation
contract.  Because such behavior does not endanger the flight or
passengers.
(Although all behaviors cannot be enumerated, under a reasonable
common-law interpretation
of the contract, passive speech (vs. say screaming the whole flight) is
harmless.)

Private property rights, of course.  But contract law too.



Re: Fwd: [IP] Gilmore bounced from plane; and Farber censors Gilmore's email

2003-07-21 Thread Steve Furlong
On Monday 21 July 2003 02:36, John Kozubik wrote:
 On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Steve Schear wrote:
  remove a small 1 button pinned to my left lapel.  I declined,
   saying that it was a political statement and that he had no right
   to censor passengers' political speech.  The button, which was
   created by

 Where do these ridiculous ideas come from ?  If I own a piece of
 private property, like an airplane (or an entire airline) for
 instance, I can impose whatever senseless and arbitrary conditions on
 your use of it as I please.

Look up common carrier.


 I note that you are attempting to
 appropriate the property rights of others (albeit in a small way)
 through a court decision (ie. guns) under the auspices of your
 perceived right to use their property as you see fit.

I'm generally agreed with you here, but regulated industries are so far 
from the libertarian ideal that there's little point to applying it to 
real-life cases such as this.

-- 
Steve FurlongComputer Condottiere   Have GNU, Will Travel

If someone is so fearful that, that they're going to start using
their weapons to protect their rights, makes me very nervous that
these people have these weapons at all!  -- Rep. Henry Waxman



Re: Defeating Optical Tempest will be easy...

2003-07-21 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 02:17 AM 7/21/03 +0200, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
There is some minuscule proportion of X-rays produced by CRT displays.

Produced by the ebeam decelerating on the shadow mask, but adsorbed
by the glass.



Heathrow employees leap out of kettle

2003-07-21 Thread Adam Shostack
http://silicon.com/news/164-51/1/5237.html?rolling=1

 Staff were angered by the roll out of swipe cards which effectively
 enable bosses to monitor their comings and goings and effectively
 re-introduced the practice of clocking-on and clocking-off.
[...]
 Around 100,000 travellers and holidaymakers were left stranded at
 the world's busiest international airport by the unofficial action
 over the weekend.

Of course, the rest of us are not so privledged.

Adam


-- 
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once.
   -Hume



nettime Help Wanted: Internet Spy

2003-07-21 Thread R. A. Hettinga
--- begin forwarded text


Status:  U
From: Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nettime Help Wanted: Internet Spy
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:50:41 -0400
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Interesting ad seen at http://www.rand.org/jobs:

*

Posting Title: Research Programmer
Location: (S) Santa Monica
Reference: 001241
Job Description:

Research Programmer

RAND is seeking a Research Programmer to work on various information
technology, security and assurance projects in our Santa Monica office. It
is preferred that the individual have familiarity with various applied
psychological measures that can be used to help with information protection
systems. Under general supervision, the research programmer will be
expected to search, monitor and track information and software tools that
relate and leverage off these measures in the context of information
security.
More generally, the position requires skills in searching for highly
technical,
computer-related information and programs within a variety of Internet and
Web sources, and organizing and structuring this material in a database for
a project's use.

Educational Requirements:
Bachelors degree (or equivalent experience) in Mathematics, Economics,
Statistics, Computer Science, Engineering, or other quantitative or computer
discipline. Master preferred. Coursework or experience must cover research
methods, policy analysis, and critical infrastructure protection.

Specific technical skills required:
Thorough technical knowledge of current computer operating systems (e.g.,
Linux, Solaris, Open BSD, Windows), and programming languages (e.g.,
Lisp, Prolog, C, Perl). Must be extremely proficient in such Internet and
Web technologies as anonymizing sites, IRC and chat rooms, and
downloading and investigating properties of hacker toolkits and related
software. Ability to organize and structure information within a database
for project use is mandatory.

Related experience required: 3 - 5 years

Type of experience required/preferred:
Applicant should have excellent interpersonal skills, be able to conduct
independent investigations of online sites, and participate in online
dialogs
(IRC, chats) by gaining the trust of relevant persons. Experience with the
content and participants of such computer security conferences as the
Black Hat Briefings, DEFCON, and CANSECWest/core03 would be
useful. A security clearance is not required, but is desirable.

Location: Santa Monica

#  distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
#  nettime is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and info nettime-l in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--- end forwarded text


-- 
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience. -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'



Re: A day in the life

2003-07-21 Thread Eric Murray
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 04:07:58PM -0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:


[ID experience at giant mega-corp casino]

[ID experience at Jiffy-loob]

If you patronize only corporate mega-stores, this is what you get.
None of the (locally-owned) resturants I eat breakfast at do any
loyalty card bullshit, they happily accept anonymous cash and the food
is wonderful.  The vendors at the local farmer's market take cash too.
The local stores in the chain of bicycle stores I sometimes go to for
tires and parts do sometimes ask me if I want to be on their buyers club
thing, I just say no and that's fine with them.

You need to shop at stores run by humans. If you have to
patronize a mega-corp, stick up for yourself.  They insist
because it works on most people.  There is no
need to baaah along with the sheep.


Eric



Re: Cypherpunks archive

2003-07-21 Thread Steve Furlong
On Monday 21 July 2003 19:49, someone wrote:
   Can you make the raw mbox archive available, or do you have that? 
 If it's less than about 200 meg, I can also receive it as an
 attachment, if you're sadistic with your mail server.

Let me think about it, and maybe ask some of the list members. The HTML 
that appears on the web page is sanitized a bit to prevent address 
harvesting. Not that c-punks' addresses are that hard to obtain other 
ways, but when I started the archive several people emphatically stated 
that they wanted the sanitizing.

Maybe I'll write a short script to sanitize the addresses in the mbox. 
That'll take a while to develop, to make sure I don't miss anything and 
because my spare time is limited for the next month and a half.

If I do make the mboxes available, they'll be available as .gz's off my 
top cypherpunks page. I'll post to the list if I do it.


List members: any preferences?


SRF

-- 
Steve FurlongComputer Condottiere   Have GNU, Will Travel

If someone is so fearful that, that they're going to start using
their weapons to protect their rights, makes me very nervous that
these people have these weapons at all!  -- Rep. Henry Waxman



Re: A 'Funky A.T.M.' Lets You Pay for Purchases Made Online

2003-07-21 Thread Steve Furlong
On Monday 21 July 2003 01:12, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
 http://nytimes.com/2003/07/21/technology/21PATE.html?pagewanted=prin
tposition=

 A 'Funky A.T.M.' Lets You Pay for Purchases Made Online

I worked on a commercial digital money system a few years ago. One of 
their business models was almost identical to Amos': stick cash in a 
kiosk to get electronic money. It'd be interesting to see how that 
system plays with Amos' patent. (I won't be able to observe directly, 
as I was fired from that company because I'm an incompetent slacker 
(boss's view) or because the boss was a jack-booted jackass (my view).)


-- 
Steve FurlongComputer Condottiere   Have GNU, Will Travel

If someone is so fearful that, that they're going to start using
their weapons to protect their rights, makes me very nervous that
these people have these weapons at all!  -- Rep. Henry Waxman



Re: Fwd: [IP] Gilmore bounced from plane; and Farber censors Gilmore's email

2003-07-21 Thread John Kozubik
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Major Variola (ret) wrote:

 Where do these ridiculous ideas come from ?  If I own a piece of
 private
 property, like an airplane (or an entire airline) for instance, I can
 impose whatever senseless and arbitrary conditions on your use of it as
 I
 please.

 Yes.
 Except that you entered into a contract to transport a human in exchange

 for money.  No where in the contract was banned speech mentioned.

If there are no provisions whatever for discretionary removal, then BA was
wrong to remove Gilmore - they broke their agreement.  However, I'll bet
if you read _all_ the fine print, somewhere there exists in the
contract/agreement a provision for just that.

-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com