Bug#397589: texlive-latex-extra does not contain beamer
Package: texlive-latex-extra Version: 2005.dfsg.2-2 Severity: normal texlive-latex-extra claims to contain beamer, but does not. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages texlive-latex-extra depends on: ii preview-latex-style11.83-2.1 LaTeX style files for editor embed ii texlive-common 2005.dfsg.2-3 TeX Live: Base component ii texlive-latex-base 2005.dfsg.2-3 TeX Live: Basic LaTeX packages ii texlive-pictures 2005.dfsg.2-3 TeX Live: Drawing and graphing pac Versions of packages texlive-latex-extra recommends: pn texlive-generic-extra none(no description available) ii texlive-latex-recommended 2005.dfsg.2-3 TeX Live: LaTeX recommended packag pn texpower none(no description available) Versions of packages tex-common depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.8 Debian configuration management sy ii ucf 2.0016 Update Configuration File: preserv Versions of packages texlive-latex-extra is related to: pn tetex-basenone (no description available) pn tetex-bin none (no description available) pn tetex-extra none (no description available) -- debconf information: tex-common/check_texmf_wrong: tex-common/check_texmf_missing: tex-common/singleuser: false -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397589: texlive-latex-extra does not contain beamer
Michael Piefel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: texlive-latex-extra Version: 2005.dfsg.2-2 Severity: normal texlive-latex-extra claims to contain beamer, but does not. Ah, interesting. It's texlive-latex-recommended that Recommends: latex-beamer. One part of the fix is going to be: --- tpm2deb.cfg (Revision 1941) +++ tpm2deb.cfg (Arbeitskopie) @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ blacklist;tpm;pgf;* depends;texlive-full;pgf (= 1.01.dfsg.1-1), latex-beamer (= 3.06.dfsg.1-0.1), latex-xcolor (= 2.09-1) recommends;texlive-pictures;pgf (= 1.01.dfsg.1-1) -recommends;texlive-latex-recommended;latex-beamer (= 3.06.dfsg.1-0.1) +recommends;texlive-latex-extra;latex-beamer (= 3.06.dfsg.1-0.1) recommends;texlive-latex-recommended;latex-xcolor (= 2.09-1) # # rcs-latex However, this won't solve the real problem. xcolor is in collection-latexrecommended.tpm, blacklisted, and texlive-latex-recommended Recommends: latex-xcolor. Still, the description of texlive-latex-recommended mentions xcolor. This requires a fix to tpm2deb.pl, I'll have a look. Thanks for reporting, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Bug#397589: texlive-latex-extra does not contain beamer
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This requires a fix to tpm2deb.pl, I'll have a look.
I guess this will do:
--- tpm2deb.pl (Revision 1941)
+++ tpm2deb.pl (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -948,6 +948,7 @@
}
print CONTROL .\n This package includes the following CTAN
packages:\n;
foreach $p (@foo) {
+ next if is_blacklisted($p,);
$tit = $TeXLive{$p}{'title'};
if (defined($Title{$p})) {
$tit = $Title{$p};
but I haven't checked yet.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Bug#397589: texlive-latex-extra does not contain beamer
Frank Küster wrote: Michael Piefel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: texlive-latex-extra Version: 2005.dfsg.2-2 Severity: normal texlive-latex-extra claims to contain beamer, but does not. Ah, interesting. It's texlive-latex-recommended that Recommends: latex-beamer. One part of the fix is going to be: Wait a second. IIRC moving beamer from texlive-latex-extra to texlive-latex-recommended was part of the TPM reorganisation done some time ago. It simply does not make sense to have the (old) prosper in texlive-latex-recommended while the currently used beamer or powerdot are in texlive-latex-extra. Hence I think it is only the description that has to be fixed. cheerio ralf
Bug#397589: texlive-latex-extra does not contain beamer
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Küster wrote: Michael Piefel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: texlive-latex-extra Version: 2005.dfsg.2-2 Severity: normal texlive-latex-extra claims to contain beamer, but does not. Ah, interesting. It's texlive-latex-recommended that Recommends: latex-beamer. One part of the fix is going to be: Wait a second. IIRC moving beamer from texlive-latex-extra to texlive-latex-recommended was part of the TPM reorganisation done some time ago. It simply does not make sense to have the (old) prosper in texlive-latex-recommended while the currently used beamer or powerdot are in texlive-latex-extra. Hence I think it is only the description that has to be fixed. Thanks for noticing. So that makes --- tpm2deb.cfg (Revision 1941) +++ tpm2deb.cfg (Arbeitskopie) @@ -529,6 +529,9 @@ blacklist;tpm;pgf;* depends;texlive-full;pgf (= 1.01.dfsg.1-1), latex-beamer (= 3.06.dfsg.1-0.1), latex-xcolor (= 2.09-1) recommends;texlive-pictures;pgf (= 1.01.dfsg.1-1) +# beamer is in collection texlive-latex-extra, but prosper is in +# *-recommended. This doesn't make sense: Let beamer be +# recommended by texlive-latex-recommended recommends;texlive-latex-recommended;latex-beamer (= 3.06.dfsg.1-0.1) recommends;texlive-latex-recommended;latex-xcolor (= 2.09-1) # For this part of the bug. Regards, Frakn -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Bug#397589: texlive-latex-extra does not contain beamer
Hi all!
On Mit, 08 Nov 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Ah, interesting. It's texlive-latex-recommended that Recommends:
latex-beamer.
Yup, it should be like this. Ralf answered correct.
On Mit, 08 Nov 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
--- tpm2deb.pl(Revision 1941)
+++ tpm2deb.pl(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -948,6 +948,7 @@
}
print CONTROL .\n This package includes the following CTAN
packages:\n;
foreach $p (@foo) {
+ next if is_blacklisted($p,);
$tit = $TeXLive{$p}{'title'};
if (defined($Title{$p})) {
$tit = $Title{$p};
but I haven't checked yet.
This is good, I will add it. Thanks. I haven't notice this.
On Mit, 08 Nov 2006, Ralf Stubner wrote:
Wait a second. IIRC moving beamer from texlive-latex-extra to
texlive-latex-recommended was part of the TPM reorganisation done some
time ago. It simply does not make sense to have the (old) prosper in
Correct.
On Mit, 08 Nov 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
--- tpm2deb.cfg (Revision 1941)
+++ tpm2deb.cfg (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -529,6 +529,9 @@
blacklist;tpm;pgf;*
depends;texlive-full;pgf (= 1.01.dfsg.1-1), latex-beamer (=
3.06.dfsg.1-0.1), latex-xcolor (= 2.09-1)
recommends;texlive-pictures;pgf (= 1.01.dfsg.1-1)
+# beamer is in collection texlive-latex-extra, but prosper is in
+# *-recommended. This doesn't make sense: Let beamer be
+# recommended by texlive-latex-recommended
recommends;texlive-latex-recommended;latex-beamer (= 3.06.dfsg.1-0.1)
recommends;texlive-latex-recommended;latex-xcolor (= 2.09-1)
#
Ok, will be added.
Tomorrow or on Friday I upload new
-extra -bin -base -lang
packages, this will be fixed, too.
Best wishes
Norbert
---
Dr. Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED]Università di Siena
Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
---
RANFURLY (adj.)
Fashion of trying ties so that the long thin end underneath dangles
below the short fat upper end.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#397589: texlive-latex-extra does not contain beamer
Frank Küster wrote: Thanks for noticing. So that makes --- tpm2deb.cfg (Revision 1941) +++ tpm2deb.cfg (Arbeitskopie) @@ -529,6 +529,9 @@ blacklist;tpm;pgf;* depends;texlive-full;pgf (= 1.01.dfsg.1-1), latex-beamer (= 3.06.dfsg.1-0.1), latex-xcolor (= 2.09-1) recommends;texlive-pictures;pgf (= 1.01.dfsg.1-1) +# beamer is in collection texlive-latex-extra, but prosper is in +# *-recommended. This doesn't make sense: Let beamer be +# recommended by texlive-latex-recommended recommends;texlive-latex-recommended;latex-beamer (= 3.06.dfsg.1-0.1) recommends;texlive-latex-recommended;latex-xcolor (= 2.09-1) # For this part of the bug. Looks good. As for errors in the description we have texlive-latex-recommended: claims to contain xcolor texlive-latex-extra: claims to contain beamer texlive-pictures: claims to contain pgf Unfortunately I have no idea how these descriptions are created. cheerio ralf
Bug#397589: texlive-latex-extra does not contain beamer
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
On Mit, 08 Nov 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Ah, interesting. It's texlive-latex-recommended that Recommends:
latex-beamer.
Yup, it should be like this. Ralf answered correct.
On Mit, 08 Nov 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
--- tpm2deb.pl (Revision 1941)
+++ tpm2deb.pl (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -948,6 +948,7 @@
}
print CONTROL .\n This package includes the following CTAN
packages:\n;
foreach $p (@foo) {
+next if is_blacklisted($p,);
$tit = $TeXLive{$p}{'title'};
if (defined($Title{$p})) {
$tit = $Title{$p};
but I haven't checked yet.
This is good, I will add it. Thanks. I haven't notice this.
You have now used
next if is_blacklisted($p,$pkg);
but the second argument is supposed to be a collection, and I assume
$pkg contains a Debian package name. I have checked that it works as
intended with instead. Are you sure?
Gruß, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
