Hi Charles, On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:18:21AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Does anybody think it is wrong to summarize in debian/copyright that SWIG > > is GPLv3 with parts being under MIT or BSD license instead of putting in > > a full copy? It is my understanding that GPLv3 is the most restrictive > > license of the bunch. > > The GPL adds restrictions but does not cancel the terms of the MIT and BSD > licenses, so their requrirement that ‘Redistributions in binary form must > reproduce the above copyright notice…’ still fully applies: you have to quote > them entirely.
Thanks for your feedback. I updated the copyright file and uploaded swig 2.0 minutes ago. Greetings, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100828210859.ga12...@merzeus.obrandt.org
