Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing (Status update)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 For hurd-i386, I - - test the base system - - fix arch-related bugs in general. Unfortunately my time is limited but I do what I can. I am a DD. Thank you, - -- Barry deFreese Sometimes helper, sometimes hinderer to: Debian Games, QA, GNU/Hurd -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlJAOv4ACgkQ5ItltUs5T361ewCfZwgDhsX9FCY1XpP4IHtX4c8w xBMAoNkA4ifW2nU4qwH9OX7uD/hKVnUn =/mJQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52403afe.30...@debian.org
Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing (Status update)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 For hurd-i386, I - - test the base system - - fix arch-related bugs in general. Unfortunately my time is limited but I do what I can. I am a DD. Thank you, - -- Barry deFreese Sometimes helper, sometimes hinderer to: Debian Games, QA, GNU/Hurd -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlI9frgACgkQ5ItltUs5T348owCfRqHf7MUY9Ou+bjvDypjEFbJo 5gYAoOHOhu0YunqeWO/vFTNk6elrb4NZ =8dMz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/523d7eb8.2070...@gmail.com
Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing (Status update)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 For hurd-i386, I - - test the base system - - fix arch-related bugs in general. Unfortunately my time is limited but I do what I can. I am a DD. Thank you, - -- Barry deFreese Sometimes helper, sometimes hinderer to: Debian Games, QA, GNU/Hurd -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlI7CusACgkQ5ItltUs5T36J4gCfdyDn6Td9E1Hl6v0qJ/FJeb5i irgAoOt1ELLYPAgcoJiN/WapZbdYG80s =vxml -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/523b0aeb.8080...@gmail.com
Re: Hurd and the archive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK, I have been significantly out of the loop for a while now but what do you base that on? What requirements are we still falling short on? Thanks, Barry deFreese On 5/6/2013 7:08 AM, Neil McGovern wrote: On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 05:07:13PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: So, release people: How likely is it that Hurd gets added to jessie? Within the next one or two months I mean, not maybe in a years time. :) I don't see it happening, to be honest. Neil -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlGHsfYACgkQ5ItltUs5T36WwgCguHojqq0bKSU3CPoAbsrviQR7 CgMAn0Ij4Tdkei+BeLn+vzhMARplG474 =fS3d -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5187b1f7.9060...@verizon.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5187b1f7.9060...@verizon.net
Re: soundmodem REMOVED from testing
Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 04:39:44PM +, Debian testing watch wrote: FYI: The status of the soundmodem source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.13-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/luk Why? Thanks, Hamish Because it has an RC bug? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517801 Barry deFreese Debian QA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Remove glib1.2
Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 12:01:09PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Hi, Now that gtk+1.2 has finally been removed for good, we should move on to get rid of the remaining glib1.2 bits: Please remove the following packages from testing along with glib1.2. I've also just filed an RC bug against glib1.2 to prevent re-migration. djplay: Last upload 15 months ago, no followup to RC bug by maintainer xdelta: Marking pending for some time, can easily be reintroduced once fixed kismet: no followup to RC bug from maintainer mixxx: no followup to RC bug from maintainer nessus-core: Removal from unstable has been requested, superceded by OpenVAS skyeye: no followup to RC bug from maintainer All hinted. BTW, I think I have patches posted for pretty much all of them. See: http://wiki.debian.org/Gtk1.2ImlibGnome1Removals Thanks, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2
Adeodato Simó wrote: libjsw All removed From a very quick look, at least some remained, eg. libjsw above: trying: -gtk+1.2 skipped: -gtk+1.2 (5 - 399) got: 16+0: i-16 * i386: epigrass, etalk, gpsim-led, gpsim-logic, gspiceui, gtalk, gtkglarea5, gtkglarea5-dev, gwave, jscalibrator, libguilegtk-1.2-0, libguilegtk-1.2-dev, python-visual, xemacs21-gnome-mule, xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn, xemacs21-gnome-nomule Eg. jscalibrator belongs to libjsw, which wasn't removed because it has one unrelated reverse dependency, searchandrescue. Thanks for looking into this, Almost all of which have had bugs filed on them for a while. I have talked to the libjsw maintainer (and the games team has even proposed fixes) but libjsw and searchandrescue have the same upstreams so they appear to be hesitant to adopt them. gtalk was NMU'd by Moritz to remove the gtk package, unfortunately it doesn't seem to have migrated to testing. Just a reminder that the status and some notes of almost all of these can be seen here: http://wiki.debian.org/Gtk1.2ImlibGnome1Removals Thank you, Barry deFreese Debian QA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Removal of remaining packages using GTK 1.2
Adeodato Simó wrote: libjsw All removed From a very quick look, at least some remained, eg. libjsw above: trying: -gtk+1.2 skipped: -gtk+1.2 (5 - 399) got: 16+0: i-16 * i386: epigrass, etalk, gpsim-led, gpsim-logic, gspiceui, gtalk, gtkglarea5, gtkglarea5-dev, gwave, jscalibrator, libguilegtk-1.2-0, libguilegtk-1.2-dev, python-visual, xemacs21-gnome-mule, xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn, xemacs21-gnome-nomule Eg. jscalibrator belongs to libjsw, which wasn't removed because it has one unrelated reverse dependency, searchandrescue. Thanks for looking into this, Almost all of which have had bugs filed on them for a while. I have talked to the libjsw maintainer (and the games team has even proposed fixes) but libjsw and searchandrescue have the same upstreams so they appear to be hesitant to adopt them. gtalk was NMU'd by Moritz to remove the gtk package, unfortunately it doesn't seem to have migrated to testing. Just a reminder that the status and some notes of almost all of these can be seen here: http://wiki.debian.org/Gtk1.2ImlibGnome1Removals Thank you, Barry deFreese Debian QA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please remove shaketracker from testing
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: shaketracker was the only remaining reverse-dependency of gtkmm (for GTK 1.2), which was recently removed. As such, shaketracker is now uninstallable. Please remove it from testing. There's an RC bug in place, which prevents migration until ported to recent GTK. Cheers, Moritz Moritz, I have been talking to Gunter and the Multimedia folks. I was planning on filing an RM: for shaketracker and gtkmm tomorrow. :) Thanks! Barry deFreese Debian QA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#520441: RM: gtk+1.2 -- ROM; deprecated for 8 years, no security support
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:55:31PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:00:26PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Please remove gtk+1.2 from unstable. The last upstream release was 8 years ago, and there isn???t any kind of maintenance happening on it, either upstream or in Debian. This will immediately make all reverse dependencies uninstallable, but this is desirable. Those who can???t be updated will need to be removed as well. They have had plenty of time to switch to GTK+ 2.X now. We shouldn???t be struggling with GTK+ 1.2 while already planning the introduction of GTK+ 3. Since AFAICT all of those packages already have RC bugs open against them, I would be open for the idea. But it might be preferable to remove the reverse-dependencies that are obsolete libraries themself earlier or at the same time, e.g. gnome-libs, wxwindows2.4, libgtkmm. We can remove the following right-away: - gnome-libs - wxwindows2.4 - gtkglarea - gtkmm imlib and gtk1.2 should be given some more time, they're much more smoothly to remove once KDE 4 is uploaded to unstable. Cheers, Moritz Just a reminder to anyone that doesn't know, we have been tracking these here: http://wiki.debian.org/Gtk1.2ImlibGnome1Removals This should include any r(b)depends of any of the packages to be removed as well. Several of these I have already sent patches for, a few of which don't seem to work properly if any of you are so inclined. Thanks, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: libphysfs 1.0.1
Adeodato Simó wrote: * Stefan Potyra [Sun, 08 Mar 2009 01:01:13 +0100]: Hi, Hello, I've just taken a look at symbols and diff of headers between 1.0.1-1 and 1.1.1-1: Thanks. From an API perspecitive these are clearly compatible, Aha? Do you know something about the nature of http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/02/msg00662.html, eg.? however looking at the ABI, 1.1.1-1 has removed a number of symbols, which however all start with two underscores and are not accessible via the headers (see attached diff of symbols). Not too sure if this calls for a SONAME bump, what's your advice? Hm. Ah, I was reading your diff backwards. Normally - is for the old/previous version, and + for the new stuff. ;-) I'd say, then, that a SONAME bump is not warranted. But it would be very useful if, given the small number of reverse dependencies, you would unpack all their .debs for amd64 or i386, and check with /usr/bin/nm that none of the __PHYSFS_* symbols are referenced. Stefan, Barry, could either of you check that? OTOH, this will mean diverting from upstream, so you may want to contact them and see what they think. If cross-distro compatibility is a concern, you could ship a libphysfs-1.1-0 - libphysfs-1.0-0 symlinks, dunno. So, actions: the nm check, and contacting upstream to see if they have something to say as to why the SONAME bump is needed (changed strutcs, or whatever). Cheers, I've e-mailed upstream. I hope they are responsive. Thanks! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: libphysfs 1.0.1
Barry deFreese wrote: Adeodato Simó wrote: * Stefan Potyra [Sun, 08 Mar 2009 01:01:13 +0100]: Hi, Hello, I've just taken a look at symbols and diff of headers between 1.0.1-1 and 1.1.1-1: Thanks. From an API perspecitive these are clearly compatible, Aha? Do you know something about the nature of http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/02/msg00662.html, eg.? however looking at the ABI, 1.1.1-1 has removed a number of symbols, which however all start with two underscores and are not accessible via the headers (see attached diff of symbols). Not too sure if this calls for a SONAME bump, what's your advice? Hm. Ah, I was reading your diff backwards. Normally - is for the old/previous version, and + for the new stuff. ;-) I'd say, then, that a SONAME bump is not warranted. But it would be very useful if, given the small number of reverse dependencies, you would unpack all their .debs for amd64 or i386, and check with /usr/bin/nm that none of the __PHYSFS_* symbols are referenced. Stefan, Barry, could either of you check that? OTOH, this will mean diverting from upstream, so you may want to contact them and see what they think. If cross-distro compatibility is a concern, you could ship a libphysfs-1.1-0 - libphysfs-1.0-0 symlinks, dunno. So, actions: the nm check, and contacting upstream to see if they have something to say as to why the SONAME bump is needed (changed strutcs, or whatever). Cheers, I've e-mailed upstream. I hope they are responsive. Thanks! Barry deFreese OK, checking with nm -D for __PHYSFS, I get the following: libparagui1.0 - Not checked because I have requested removal of this package. libparagui1.1 - No results for __PHYSFS. Builds fine with libphysfs-1.1.1. asc - No result for __PHYSFS. Builds fine with libphysfs-1.1.1 and libparagui1.1 built with libphysfs-1.1. balder2d - No results for __PHYSFS. Builds fine with libphysfs-1.1.1. lincity-ng - No results for __PHYSFS. Builds fine with libphysfs-1.1.1. love - Currently FTBFS. Unrelated. netpanzer - No results for __PHYSFS. Builds fine with libphysfs-1.1.1. pingus - No PHYSFS at all. Looks like a spurious build-dep. Upstream seems to have removed it some time in 2007. taoframework - tmw - No results for __PHYSFS. Builds fine with libphysfs-1.1.1. trigger-rally (trigger) - No results for __PHYSFS. Builds fine with libphysfs-1.1.1. warzone2100 - No results for __PHYSFS. Builds fine with libphysfs-1.1.1. Does that help any? Thanks! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: libphysfs 1.0.1
Barry deFreese wrote: Adeodato Simó wrote: TO ALL REVERSE DEPENDENCIES OF libphysfs: please don't recompile/upload against libphysfs-1.0-1 until the issue mentioned below is figured out. We will let you know. * Barry deFreese [Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:00:34 -0500]: Barry deFreese wrote: Hi folks, Hello, Barry! It appears that all of the packages are fine with libphysfs-1.0.1 so I have uploaded it to unstable. Two comments. First, I'm not sure if you're aware that waiting for an ACK from the release team before uploading soname bumping packages is preferred. If you're aware and you thought it was okay, well, okay. ;-) No, I wasn't when we are just after a release so my apologies there. Second, and more importantly, I actually see no reason for the SONAME bump! Meaning, that as far as I can see, the list of symbols between libphysfs-1.0.so.1 and libphysfs-1.0.so.0 is identical. Do you know if there has been some other ABI change that does not entail symbols, and which would make the bump needed? If not, we'll need to talk about reverting it. It'd be great if you could check. I don't think there is. What I think actually happened was that the previous version actually had the wrong package name. Does it really require a reversion? 1.1.1 may suffer from the same issues. (Meaning it has another soname change upstream but I think the symbols are identical, but I need to verify that.). Cheers, Thanks, Barry deFreese Well it appears that I was wrong about part of it. 1.0.0 isn't complaining about the package name, even though I think it probably should. 1.0.1 Does seem to be ABI compatible and is NOT a soname bump. I'm attaching objdump -T output from 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 just in case I missed something. 1.1.1 does appear to have some significant changes so that might be a bigger issue but I think I goofed on the 1.0.1 upload and there should be no issues. Sorry, Barry deFreese /usr/lib/libphysfs-1.0.so.1.0.0: file format elf32-i386 DYNAMIC SYMBOL TABLE: DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 __errno_location DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 setmntent DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 sprintf DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 open DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 mkdir DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 strerror DF *UND* inflateEnd DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 __xstat w D *UND* __gmon_start__ w D *UND* _Jv_RegisterClasses DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 __lxstat DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 realloc DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 strchr DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 getenv DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 strncpy DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 write DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 read DF *UND* inflateInit2_ DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 usleep DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 readdir DF *UND* inflate DF *UND* GLIBC_2.3 __ctype_toupper_loc DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 free DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 access DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 opendir DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 pthread_mutex_unlock DF *UND* GLIBC_2.3 realpath DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 mktime DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 fsync DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 memcpy DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 strlen DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 pthread_mutex_destroy DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 getpwuid DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 strcpy DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 getuid DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 pthread_mutex_init DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 closedir DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 close DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 strstr DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 remove DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 malloc DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 pthread_mutex_lock DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 endmntent DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 getmntent DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 memmove DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 strcat DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 getcwd DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 __fxstat DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 strncmp DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 lseek DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0 strcmp w DF *UND* GLIBC_2.1.3 __cxa_finalize DF *UND* GLIBC_2.0
Re: libphysfs 1.0.1
Barry deFreese wrote: Barry deFreese wrote: Adeodato Simó wrote: TO ALL REVERSE DEPENDENCIES OF libphysfs: please don't recompile/upload against libphysfs-1.0-1 until the issue mentioned below is figured out. We will let you know. * Barry deFreese [Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:00:34 -0500]: Barry deFreese wrote: Hi folks, Hello, Barry! It appears that all of the packages are fine with libphysfs-1.0.1 so I have uploaded it to unstable. Two comments. First, I'm not sure if you're aware that waiting for an ACK from the release team before uploading soname bumping packages is preferred. If you're aware and you thought it was okay, well, okay. ;-) No, I wasn't when we are just after a release so my apologies there. Second, and more importantly, I actually see no reason for the SONAME bump! Meaning, that as far as I can see, the list of symbols between libphysfs-1.0.so.1 and libphysfs-1.0.so.0 is identical. Do you know if there has been some other ABI change that does not entail symbols, and which would make the bump needed? If not, we'll need to talk about reverting it. It'd be great if you could check. I don't think there is. What I think actually happened was that the previous version actually had the wrong package name. Does it really require a reversion? 1.1.1 may suffer from the same issues. (Meaning it has another soname change upstream but I think the symbols are identical, but I need to verify that.). Cheers, Thanks, Barry deFreese Well it appears that I was wrong about part of it. 1.0.0 isn't complaining about the package name, even though I think it probably should. 1.0.1 Does seem to be ABI compatible and is NOT a soname bump. I'm attaching objdump -T output from 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 just in case I missed something. 1.1.1 does appear to have some significant changes so that might be a bigger issue but I think I goofed on the 1.0.1 upload and there should be no issues. Sorry, Barry deFreese Sorry I should have clarified. libphysfs-1.0.0 SONAME is libphysfs-1.0.so.0 and libphysfs-1.0.1 is libphysfs-1.0.so.1. (Thanks to Julien for pointing that out). Thanks, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: libphysfs 1.0.1
Barry deFreese wrote: Hi folks, I would like to upload libphysfs 1.0.1 to unstable. It is a soname change. You are all CC'd because you have a package that build-depends on it. I will attempt to test build all of the packages but if any of you know or could build your own for me it would be greatly appreciated. It is already in experimental. Upstream does have a 1.1.1 version but apparently it has some issues, unless any of you know otherwise. I hope to get it uploaded by the end of March. Here are the packages that are affected: asc, balder2d, libparagui1.0, libparagui1.1, lincity-ng, love, netpanzer, pingus, taoframework, tmw, trigger, warzone2100 Thank you, Barry deFreese Debian Games Team It appears that all of the packages are fine with libphysfs-1.0.1 so I have uploaded it to unstable. I will shortly be uploading 1.1.1 to Experimental as well since it seems that the issue with Warzone2100 may have been alleviated. So if you want to hold out for 1.1.1, that might be wise provided everything works OK. As as side note, I will probably be requesting removal of moagg* from the archive, and then libparagui1.0. Right now only moagg and ASC are r(b)depends on it and ASC is fine with 1.1. Thanks! Barry deFreese Debian Games Team -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: libphysfs 1.0.1
Adeodato Simó wrote: TO ALL REVERSE DEPENDENCIES OF libphysfs: please don't recompile/upload against libphysfs-1.0-1 until the issue mentioned below is figured out. We will let you know. * Barry deFreese [Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:00:34 -0500]: Barry deFreese wrote: Hi folks, Hello, Barry! It appears that all of the packages are fine with libphysfs-1.0.1 so I have uploaded it to unstable. Two comments. First, I'm not sure if you're aware that waiting for an ACK from the release team before uploading soname bumping packages is preferred. If you're aware and you thought it was okay, well, okay. ;-) No, I wasn't when we are just after a release so my apologies there. Second, and more importantly, I actually see no reason for the SONAME bump! Meaning, that as far as I can see, the list of symbols between libphysfs-1.0.so.1 and libphysfs-1.0.so.0 is identical. Do you know if there has been some other ABI change that does not entail symbols, and which would make the bump needed? If not, we'll need to talk about reverting it. It'd be great if you could check. I don't think there is. What I think actually happened was that the previous version actually had the wrong package name. Does it really require a reversion? 1.1.1 may suffer from the same issues. (Meaning it has another soname change upstream but I think the symbols are identical, but I need to verify that.). Cheers, Thanks, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
libphysfs 1.0.1
Hi folks, I would like to upload libphysfs 1.0.1 to unstable. It is a soname change. You are all CC'd because you have a package that build-depends on it. I will attempt to test build all of the packages but if any of you know or could build your own for me it would be greatly appreciated. It is already in experimental. Upstream does have a 1.1.1 version but apparently it has some issues, unless any of you know otherwise. I hope to get it uploaded by the end of March. Here are the packages that are affected: asc, balder2d, libparagui1.0, libparagui1.1, lincity-ng, love, netpanzer, pingus, taoframework, tmw, trigger, warzone2100 Thank you, Barry deFreese Debian Games Team -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Removing orphaned packages from testing
W. Martin Borgert wrote: On 2009-02-16 15:44, Raphael Geissert wrote: The idea was to leave them out of *testing*, not immediately dropping them from the archive. +1 I'm struggling a little with this. Obviously I'm the first person to want to see cruft removed and I realize we are just talking about testing but I'm thinking about something like Gtk1.2 which is currently orphaned with 60+ r(b)depends. Do we really want to those have issues too before we have a plan to do anything about them? Cripes I have been fighting for months for gnome-libs and imlib which have a handful of r(b)depends between the two. Or libnet0 which has 3. Thanks, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Testing removals and freeze requests:
Hi, Please remove AND freeze the following source packages from testing: gnome-libs 1.4.2-37 libnet0 1.0.2a-7 imlib 1.9.15-7 Please also remove the following r(b)depends from testing: gnome-libs: powershell 0.9-8 soundtracker 0.6.8-2 libnet0: nemesis 1:1.4-1 paketto 1.10-7 sing 1.1-17 imlib: libgtkimreg 0.1.3.1-1 paul 0.1.1.1-1 pixelize 0.9.2-4 qiv 2.1~pre12-5 xteddy 2.1-3 ygraph 0.15-3.1 kdegraphics 4:3.5.9-3 icewm 1.2.37-1 I hope the rational for this is obvious but if you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. I'll hopefully be sending along a Gtk1.2 request soon. BTW, good job to everyone for the Lenny release and thanks for all of the hard work!! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Unblock request: ogle-gui 0.9.2-4.2
Neil McGovern wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:46:40PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: Please unblock ogle-gui 0.9.2-4.2. Another unnecessary build-dep on a gnome-lib (and some minor lintian fixes). Here is the changelog: Any idea what: --- ogle-gui-0.9.2/debian/ogle-gui.desktop +++ ogle-gui-0.9.2/debian/ogle-gui.desktop @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ [Desktop Entry] -Encoding=UTF-8 Version=0.9.2 Name=Ogle Type=Application is about? Neil The Encoding field in desktop files is deprecated. Did I not put that in the changelog? Thanks for all the unblocks by the way! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Unblock request:
Hi, Please unblock slmon. The changes are minor but mainly to remove the build-deps on old gnome-libs. Here is the changelog: slmon (0.5.13-2.2) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Update build-deps to libgnome2-dev and libglib2-dev. + Though I believe both are unnecessary. * Make distclean not ignore errors. * Add watch file. * Add Homepage. * Add copyright holders to debian/copyright. * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. (No changes needed). -- Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:30:17 -0500 Thank you! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Unblock request: synce-trayicon 0.11-1.1
Hi, Please unblock synce-trayicon. It is a minor change to remove an unnecessary build-dep on a gnome-lib. Here is the changelog: synce-trayicon (0.11-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Remove unneeded build-dep on libgnome-dev. (Closes: #508944). -- Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org Thu, 01 Jan 2009 19:28:45 -0500 Thank you! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Unblock request: glotski 0.2-7
Hi, Please unblock glotski. It's a small change to remove an unneeded build-dep on a gnome-libs binary. Here is the changelog entry: glotski (0.2-7) unstable; urgency=low * Remove unnecessary build dependency on libgnome32 (thanks, Barry deFreese!) (Closes: #509542) -- Hwei Sheng Teoh hst...@debian.org Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:55:09 -0800 Thank you! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Unblock request: gwc
Hi, Please consider unblocking gwc . The number of changes are significant but small (Mainly to kill more gnome-lib build-depends). If you would like to see a diff, please let me know. Here are the last two changelog entries against what is in testing: gwc (0.21.05-1.2) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Remove unnecessary build-dep on libgnome-dev. (Closes: #509463). + 04_no_gnome_config.patch - Replace gnome-config call with pkg-config. -- Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org Thu, 01 Jan 2009 18:31:28 -0500 2008 gwc (0.21.05-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Add .xpm desktop icon. (Closes: #299355). + Update .desktop and menu file accordingly. + Thanks to Tim Hall for the file. * Fix executable name in .desktop file. + Remove deprecated Encoding tag. * Move fftw3-dev build-dep to libfftw3-dev. * Move Homepage from package description to source stanza. * debian/copyright: Update license info. (Closes: #435302). + Add copyright holder. * 03_dont_strip.patch: Remove -s on install. (Closes: #437143). * Update help file path in gwc.1. (Closes: #370716). * Fix doc base section. * Update Gnome to GNOME in package description. * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. + Menu policy transition. -- Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:01:05 -0500 Thank you! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Unblock request: mrwtoppm 0.1.1-2.2
Hi,
Please consider unblocking mrwtoppm 0.1.1-2.2. Another unnecessary
gnome-libs build-dep. I did bump compat on this one though. Here is
the changelog entry:
mrwtoppm (0.1.1-2.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Drop unneeded build-depends on gdk-pixbuf-dev and libart-dev.
* Add ${misc:Depends} to binary packages.
* Bump debhelper build-dep to 5.0.0.
+ Move DH_COMPAT from rules to compat and set to 5.
* Make clean not ignore errors.
* Add copyright holders to Copyright.
+ Source is GPL v2 or later so change link in debian/copyright.
* Add watch file.
* Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0.
-- Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:49:38 -0500
Thank you!
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Unblock request: ogle-gui 0.9.2-4.2
Hi, Please unblock ogle-gui 0.9.2-4.2. Another unnecessary build-dep on a gnome-lib (and some minor lintian fixes). Here is the changelog: ogle-gui (0.9.2-4.2) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Remove unneeded build-dep on libart-dev. * Make clean not ignore errors. * Add copyright holder to debian/copyright. * Add dh_desktop call to rules. * Fix watch file. * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. -- Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:39:00 -0500 Thank you! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Unblock request: gnomekiss 2.0-3
Hi, Please unblock gnomekiss 2.0-3. Another unnecessary build-dep on an old gnome-lib. Here is the changelog: gnomekiss (2.0-3) unstable; urgency=low [ Barry deFreese ] * Remove unnecessary build-dep on libgtkhtml-dev. * Update my e-mail address. * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. -- Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:55:11 -0500 Thank you! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Unblock request: fenix 0.92a.dfsg1-5
Hi, Please unblock fenix 0.92a.dfsg1-5. We have removed 64bit architectures for now until a better solution can be found for #456037. Here is the changelog: fenix (0.92a.dfsg1-5) unstable; urgency=low [ Peter De Wachter ] * Compile with -fno-strict-aliasing. (Closes: #456034) * Drop 64 bit architectures, until #456037 is solved. * Added watch file. [ Barry deFreese ] * Acknowledge NMUs. * Add myself to uploaders. * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. (No changes needed). -- Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:11:59 -0500 Thank you, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Unblock request: xnc 5.0.4-3
Hi,
Please consider unblocking xnc 5.0.4-3. It closes an LFS release goal
bug and some others. I did bump the compat level on this one because it
was 3, if that makes a difference in your decision.
Here is the changelog entry:
xnc (5.0.4-3) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
+ Set maintainer to Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org.
* Add ${misc:Depends}.
* Bump debhelper build-dep and compat to 5.
+ Move DH_COMPAT from rules to debian/compat.
* Update doc-base section to File Managemnt.
* Update x-dev build-dep to x11proto-core-dev.
* Display 2Gb files properly. (Closes: #451239).
+ Thanks to Emil Nowak for the patch.
* Fix spelling error in debian/doc-base.
* Fix some typos and grammar errors in manpages.
+ Thanks to A Costa for the patches.
* Fix hyphens used as minus in manpages.
* Make clean not ignore errors.
* Remove config.status and config.log on clean.
* Remove Encoding field from desktop file.
* Install xnc.desktop in proper dir.
* Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0.
+ Menu policy transition.
-- Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:53:11 -0500
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Unblock request: genpower 1.0.5-2.3
Hi, Please unblock genpower 1.0.5-2.3. Mainly for the piuparts bug fix (#455026) but it also contains a few other small bugfixes. Here are the changelog entries (Yes I messed up the first upload): genpower (1.0.5-2.3) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Actually remove -DNEWINIT this time. -- Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:59:16 -0500 genpower (1.0.5-2.2) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix doc path in postinst. * Remove -DNEWINIT from make call in rules. (Closes: #487847). * Remove /etc/init.d/ups-monitor* in postrm. (Closes: #455026). * Don't strip on nostrip in rules. (Closes: #436968). + Remove -s from install in Makefile. * Set -e in maintainer scripts. * Invoke RC properly in prerm. * Add copyright holders. * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. -- Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:31:11 -0500 Thank you, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unblock request: crystalspace
Adeodato Simó wrote: * Barry deFreese [Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:37:21 -0500]: Please unblock crystalspace . The NMU is pretty intrusive and was done with involvement from the maintainer. The package has not been in testing previously so if you prefer not to allow it, that is understandable. With so low popcon, I'd rather pass if you don't mind much. Other release person may pick it up, though. Actually if it FTBFS on several other archs, let's just leave it out anyway. I'll work on the new upstream after Lenny. Thanks all! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unblock request: crystalspace
Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 13:37:21 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: * Adjust build-depends. + Change xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev to libgl1-mesa-dev. eh? why remove the libgl-dev alternative? Cheers, Julien Gah, that was a mistake. I'll fix that on the next upload. Thanks for catching it. Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unblock request irmp3 0.5.7pre2-1.3
Hi, Please unblock irmp3 0.5.7pre2-1.3. If fixes a Lenny Release Goal for bash. Here is the changelog: irmp3 (0.5.7pre2-1.3) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * 04-bashism.dpatch. Fix bashism in mount.sh. (Closes: #489614). + Thanks to Chris Lamb for the patch. * Add watch file. * Make clean not ignore errors. * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. (No changes needed). -- Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:51:17 -0500 Thank you, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unblock request: smooth-themes 0.5.8-2.2
Hi, Please unblock smooth-themes 0.5.8-2.2. Fixes Lenny release goal no depends from non-main. Here is the changelog: smooth-themes (0.5.8-2.2) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Remove gtk-engines-smooth from depends. (Closes: #380375). * Don't install bogus upstream ChangeLog. (Closes: #266377). * Move debhelper to build-depends to satisfy clean. * Remove config.log on clean. * Add watch file. * Add Homepage. * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. -- Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:54:36 -0500 Thank you, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unblock request: kpax 20080304-2
Hi,
Please unblock kpax 20080304-2. Fixes RC bug. Here is a debdiff of the
changes:
diff -u kpax-20080304/debian/changelog kpax-20080304/debian/changelog
--- kpax-20080304/debian/changelog
+++ kpax-20080304/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+kpax (20080304-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add cl-ironcland to depends. (Closes: #505196).
++ Thanks to Peter De Wachter.
+ * Add myself to uploaders.
+ * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. (No changes needed).
+
+ -- Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:32:24 -0500
+
kpax (20080304-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream
diff -u kpax-20080304/debian/control kpax-20080304/debian/control
--- kpax-20080304/debian/control
+++ kpax-20080304/debian/control
@@ -4,14 +4,14 @@
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0)
Build-Depends-Indep: dh-lisp
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Uploaders: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Standards-Version: 3.7.3
+Uploaders: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED], Barry deFreese
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+Standards-Version: 3.8.0
Homepage: http://homepage.mac.com/svc/kpax/
Vcs-Darcs: http://darcs.debian.org/darcs/pkg-common-lisp/kpax
Package: cl-kpax
Architecture: all
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, cl-who, cl-puri, cl-s-utils, cl-s-sysdeps,
cl-s-base64, cl-s-http-server | cl-aserve
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, cl-who, cl-puri, cl-ironclad, cl-s-utils,
cl-s-sysdeps, cl-s-base64, cl-s-http-server | cl-aserve
Description: A Common Lisp Application Framework
KPAX is a Common Lisp Web Application Framework. Although KPAX is
quite mature
and has been in production use for years, the documentation is
currently not
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unblock request: crystalspace
Hi,
Please unblock crystalspace . The NMU is pretty intrusive and was done
with involvement from the maintainer. The package has not been in
testing previously so if you prefer not to allow it, that is
understandable. Here is the changelog:
crystalspace (1.2-20080206-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Don't build with no-long-double. (Closes: #471057).
+ Thanks to Andres Mejia for the fix.
* Add watch file.
* Move DH_COMPAT from rules to debian/compat.
* Remove maintainer scripts, addmissing, and control-fr files.
* debian/copyright: Add license info for castle level.
* Remove arch checks to build on all archs. (Closes: #492920).
+ Thanks to Devid Antonio Filoni for the diff.
+ Should now build on kfreebsd as well. (Closes: #462326).
* Add get-orig-source target.
* Adjust build-depends.
+ Change xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev to libgl1-mesa-dev.
+ Add libcaca-dev, libwxgtk2.8-dev, libcegui-mk2-dev.
* Fix depends on -dev package.
+ Change libc6-dev to ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}.
* Add Homepage stanza.
* Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0.
+ Menu policy transition.
-- Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:42:33 -0500
I'm also attaching a debdiff.
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
reverted:
--- crystalspace-1.2-20080206/debian/postrm
+++ crystalspace-1.2-20080206.orig/debian/postrm
@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
-#! /bin/sh
-# postrm script for crystalspace
-#
-# see: dh_installdeb(1)
-
-set -e
-
-# summary of how this script can be called:
-#* postrm `remove'
-#* postrm `purge'
-#* old-postrm `upgrade' new-version
-#* new-postrm `failed-upgrade' old-version
-#* new-postrm `abort-install'
-#* new-postrm `abort-install' old-version
-#* new-postrm `abort-upgrade' old-version
-#* disappearer's-postrm `disappear' roverwritr new-version
-# for details, see /usr/share/doc/packaging-manual/
-
-case $1 in
-
purge|remove|upgrade|failed-upgrade|abort-install|abort-upgrade|disappear)
-
-
-;;
-
-*)
-echo postrm called with unknown argument \`$1' 2
-exit 0
-
-esac
-
-# dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically
-# generated by other debhelper scripts.
-
-#DEBHELPER#
-
-
reverted:
--- crystalspace-1.2-20080206/debian/postinst
+++ crystalspace-1.2-20080206.orig/debian/postinst
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-#! /bin/sh
-# postinst script for crystalspace
-#
-# see: dh_installdeb(1)
-
-set -e
-
-# summary of how this script can be called:
-#* postinst `configure' most-recently-configured-version
-#* old-postinst `abort-upgrade' new version
-#* conflictor's-postinst `abort-remove' `in-favour' package
-# new-version
-#* deconfigured's-postinst `abort-deconfigure' `in-favour'
-# failed-install-package version `removing'
-# conflicting-package version
-# for details, see /usr/share/doc/packaging-manual/
-#
-# quoting from the policy:
-# Any necessary prompting should almost always be confined to the
-# post-installation script, and should be protected with a conditional
-# so that unnecessary prompting doesn't happen if a package's
-# installation fails and the `postinst' is called with `abort-upgrade',
-# `abort-remove' or `abort-deconfigure'.
-
-case $1 in
-configure)
-# dh_link don't do this correctly
-#[ ! -L /usr/lib/crystalspace/data/config ] [ -d
/usr/lib/crystalspace/data/config ] rmdir /usr/lib/crystalspace/data/config
ln -s /etc/crystalspace/config /usr/lib/crystalspace/data/config
-;;
-
-abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure)
-
-;;
-
-*)
-echo postinst called with unknown argument \`$1' 2
-exit 0
-;;
-esac
-
-# dh_installdeb will replace this with shell code automatically
-# generated by other debhelper scripts.
-
-#DEBHELPER#
-
-exit 0
-
-
diff -u crystalspace-1.2-20080206/debian/changelog
crystalspace-1.2-20080206/debian/changelog
--- crystalspace-1.2-20080206/debian/changelog
+++ crystalspace-1.2-20080206/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,27 @@
+crystalspace (1.2-20080206-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Don't build with no-long-double. (Closes: #471057).
++ Thanks to Andres Mejia for the fix.
+ * Add watch file.
+ * Move DH_COMPAT from rules to debian/compat.
+ * Remove maintainer scripts, addmissing, and control-fr files.
+ * debian/copyright: Add license info for castle level.
+ * Remove arch checks to build on all archs. (Closes: #492920).
++ Thanks to Devid Antonio Filoni for the diff.
++ Should now build on kfreebsd as well. (Closes: #462326).
+ * Add get-orig-source target.
+ * Adjust build-depends.
++ Change xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev to libgl1-mesa-dev.
++ Add libcaca-dev, libwxgtk2.8-dev, libcegui-mk2-dev.
+ * Fix depends on -dev package.
++ Change libc6-dev to ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}.
+ * Add Homepage stanza.
+ * Bump Standards
Unblock request: glunarclock 1:0.32.4-11
Hi, Please unblock glunarclock 1:0.32.4-11. Fixes bashism Lenny goal. Here is the changelog: glunarclock (1:0.32.4-11) unstable; urgency=low * debian/copyright: + Added missing copyright holders. * debian/rules: + Fixed bashism in debian/rules (Closes: #478387). * Add descriptions to dpatch files. * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. (No changes needed). -- Fabian Greffrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 17 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0200 Thank you, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unblock request mpg321 0.2.10.5 ?
Hi, I have just done some pretty significant changes to mpg321 with a QA upload. Ideally it should probably get in to Lenny but I did bump the compat level to 5 as it was set at 2. It fixes several bugs in the package but I realize that is a no-no for release so if you don't want to unblock it I understand but the package has been severely unmaintained. It really probably should be removed but has fairly high popcon stats. Here is the changelog of the changes I made: mpg321 (0.2.10.5) unstable; urgency=low * QA upload. + Set maintainer to Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]. * Add large file support. (Closes: #152392). + Thanks to Clint Adams for the patch. * Avoid crashing on non mp3 files. (Closes: #458035). + Thanks to Justin Pryzby for the patch. * Don't scan file before playback. (Closes: #500102). + Thanks to Mikko Rapeli for the patch. * Don't leave dangling symlink. (Closes: #227713). + Thanks to Donggyoo Lee for the patch. * README.remote should use @P not @S. (Closes: #153596). + Add STOP comments. * Make AM_PATH_AO XIPH_PATH_AO in configure.ac. * Escape hyphens in manpage. * Bump debhelper build-dep to 5. * Move DH_COMPAT to debian/compat and set to 5. * Make distclean not ignore errors. * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. -- Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:25:12 -0500 Thank you, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unblock request: recite 1.0-8.2
Adeodato Simó wrote: * Barry deFreese [Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:16:22 -0500]: Hi, Hello, Barry. Please unblock recite 1.0-8.2. Fixes bug #504905 which is a real fix for RC bug #504200 rather than my work-around. Oh, sure. However, should the workaround be removed, then?: - if (dB 0) + if (dB 0 || dB 88) Adeodato, I don't think so personally, that is still a valid check as anything above 88 is going to puke and should fail gracefully. Thanks, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unblock request: recite 1.0-8.2
Hi,
Please unblock recite 1.0-8.2. Fixes bug #504905 which is a real fix
for RC bug #504200 rather than my work-around.
Here is a debdiff of the upload:
diff -u recite-1.0/debian/changelog recite-1.0/debian/changelog
--- recite-1.0/debian/changelog
+++ recite-1.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+recite (1.0-8.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Real fix for segfaults on out-of-bounds. (Closes: #504905).
++ Thanks to Peter De Wachter for the patch.
+
+ -- Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:14:24 -0500
+
recite (1.0-8.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u recite-1.0/phonemes/rules.c recite-1.0/phonemes/rules.c
--- recite-1.0/phonemes/rules.c
+++ recite-1.0/phonemes/rules.c
@@ -235,6 +235,11 @@
}
if (ph = FRICATIVES_END)
{
+ *offset = ph - FRICATIVES_START;
+ return FRICATIVE_TYPE;
+ }
+ if (ph = PLOSIVES_END)
+ {
*offset = ph - PLOSIVES_START;
return PLOSIVE_TYPE;
}
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unblock request: recite 1.0-8.1
Hi,
Please unblock recite 1.0-8.1. Fixes RC bug #504200 and some other
small fixes.
Here is a debdiff of the upload:
diff -u recite-1.0/klatt/parwave.c recite-1.0/klatt/parwave.c
--- recite-1.0/klatt/parwave.c
+++ recite-1.0/klatt/parwave.c
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@
/*
* Check limits or argument (can be removed in final product)
*/
- if (dB 0)
+ if (dB 0 || dB 88)
{
trace((Try to compute amptable[%d]\n, dB));
return(0);
diff -u recite-1.0/debian/copyright recite-1.0/debian/copyright
--- recite-1.0/debian/copyright
+++ recite-1.0/debian/copyright
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
Upstream Author: Peter Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+Copyright: Copyright (C) 1993 Peter Miller
+
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any
@@ -17,8 +19,8 @@
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
-Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
+Foundation Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston,
+MA 02110-1301, USA.
On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General
Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
diff -u recite-1.0/debian/control recite-1.0/debian/control
--- recite-1.0/debian/control
+++ recite-1.0/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Maintainer: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Section: sound
Priority: optional
-Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0
+Standards-Version: 3.8.0
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 3.0)
Package: recite
diff -u recite-1.0/debian/changelog recite-1.0/debian/changelog
--- recite-1.0/debian/changelog
+++ recite-1.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+recite (1.0-8.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
++ With permission from maintainer.
+ * klatt/parwave.c: Check upper bound on DBtoLIN. (Closes: #504200).
++ Not a real solution but exits more gracefully.
++ Thanks to Emmet Hikory for the help.
+ * Priority medium for RC bug fix.
+ * Escape hyphens in manpage.
+ * debian/copyright: Add Copyright holder.
++ Update FSF address.
+ * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. (No changes needed).
+
+ -- Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:23:30 -0500
+
recite (1.0-8) unstable; urgency=low
* Makefile:
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- recite-1.0.orig/man1/recite.1
+++ recite-1.0/man1/recite.1
@@ -110,10 +110,10 @@
The
.I recite
program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY;
-for details use the '\fIrecite -VERSion Warranty\fP' command.
+for details use the '\fIrecite \-VERSion Warranty\fP' command.
This is free software
and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions;
-for details use the '\fIrecite -VERSion Redistribution\fP' command.
+for details use the '\fIrecite \-VERSion Redistribution\fP' command.
.br
.ne 1i
.SH AUTHOR
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unblock request: sysprof
Hi,
Please unblock sysprof modules source (Closes RC bug #464838). It is a
new upstream release but with very minimal changes (See attached
debdiff). It allows sysprof to be built on newer 2.6.2x kernels.
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
diff -Nru sysprof-1.0.10/aclocal.m4 sysprof-1.0.11/aclocal.m4
--- sysprof-1.0.10/aclocal.m4 2008-04-27 19:41:22.0 -0400
+++ sysprof-1.0.11/aclocal.m4 2008-10-24 19:06:45.0 -0400
@@ -927,16 +927,14 @@
# _PKG_CONFIG([VARIABLE], [COMMAND], [MODULES])
# -
m4_define([_PKG_CONFIG],
-[if test -n $PKG_CONFIG; then
-if test -n $$1; then
-pkg_cv_[]$1=$$1
-else
-PKG_CHECK_EXISTS([$3],
- [pkg_cv_[]$1=`$PKG_CONFIG --[]$2 $3 2/dev/null`],
- [pkg_failed=yes])
-fi
-else
- pkg_failed=untried
+[if test -n $$1; then
+pkg_cv_[]$1=$$1
+ elif test -n $PKG_CONFIG; then
+PKG_CHECK_EXISTS([$3],
+ [pkg_cv_[]$1=`$PKG_CONFIG --[]$2 $3 2/dev/null`],
+ [pkg_failed=yes])
+ else
+pkg_failed=untried
fi[]dnl
])# _PKG_CONFIG
@@ -980,9 +978,9 @@
if test $pkg_failed = yes; then
_PKG_SHORT_ERRORS_SUPPORTED
if test $_pkg_short_errors_supported = yes; then
- $1[]_PKG_ERRORS=`$PKG_CONFIG --short-errors --errors-to-stdout --print-errors $2`
+ $1[]_PKG_ERRORS=`$PKG_CONFIG --short-errors --print-errors $2 21`
else
- $1[]_PKG_ERRORS=`$PKG_CONFIG --errors-to-stdout --print-errors $2`
+ $1[]_PKG_ERRORS=`$PKG_CONFIG --print-errors $2 21`
fi
# Put the nasty error message in config.log where it belongs
echo $$1[]_PKG_ERRORS AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FD
diff -Nru sysprof-1.0.10/binfile.c sysprof-1.0.11/binfile.c
--- sysprof-1.0.10/binfile.c 2007-03-03 20:45:29.0 -0500
+++ sysprof-1.0.11/binfile.c 2008-10-24 19:05:55.0 -0400
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
* Copyright 2002, Kristian Rietveld
*
* Sysprof -- Sampling, systemwide CPU profiler
- * Copyright 2004, 2005, Soeren Sandmann
+ * Copyright 2004, 2005, 2008 Soeren Sandmann
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@
get_debug_link_info (bfd *abfd, unsigned long *crc32_out)
{
asection *sect;
-bfd_size_type debuglink_size;
+ssize_t debuglink_size;
unsigned long crc32;
char *contents;
int crc_offset;
@@ -142,12 +142,28 @@
if (sect == NULL)
return NULL;
-debuglink_size = bfd_section_size (abfd, sect);
-
+debuglink_size = bfd_get_section_limit (abfd, sect);
+
+if (debuglink_size 6)
+{
+ g_warning (%s: .gnu_debuglink section is %d bytes long,
+ abfd-filename, debuglink_size);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
contents = g_malloc (debuglink_size);
bfd_get_section_contents (abfd, sect, contents,
(file_ptr)0, (bfd_size_type)debuglink_size);
-
+
+/* Sanity check */
+if (!memchr (contents, '\0', debuglink_size - 4))
+{
+ g_warning (%s: Malformed .gnu_debuglink section, abfd-filename);
+
+ g_free (contents);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
/* Crc value is stored after the filename, aligned up to 4 bytes. */
crc_offset = strlen (contents) + 1;
crc_offset = (crc_offset + 3) ~3;
diff -Nru sysprof-1.0.10/configure sysprof-1.0.11/configure
--- sysprof-1.0.10/configure 2008-04-27 19:41:25.0 -0400
+++ sysprof-1.0.11/configure 2008-10-24 19:06:48.0 -0400
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#! /bin/sh
# Guess values for system-dependent variables and create Makefiles.
-# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61 for sysprof 1.0.10.
+# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61 for sysprof 1.0.11.
#
# Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,
# 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
@@ -572,8 +572,8 @@
# Identity of this package.
PACKAGE_NAME='sysprof'
PACKAGE_TARNAME='sysprof'
-PACKAGE_VERSION='1.0.10'
-PACKAGE_STRING='sysprof 1.0.10'
+PACKAGE_VERSION='1.0.11'
+PACKAGE_STRING='sysprof 1.0.11'
PACKAGE_BUGREPORT=''
ac_unique_file=sysprof.glade
@@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@
# Omit some internal or obsolete options to make the list less imposing.
# This message is too long to be a string in the A/UX 3.1 sh.
cat _ACEOF
-\`configure' configures sysprof 1.0.10 to adapt to many kinds of systems.
+\`configure' configures sysprof 1.0.11 to adapt to many kinds of systems.
Usage: $0 [OPTION]... [VAR=VALUE]...
@@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@
if test -n $ac_init_help; then
case $ac_init_help in
- short | recursive ) echo Configuration of sysprof 1.0.10:;;
+ short | recursive ) echo Configuration of sysprof 1.0.11:;;
esac
cat \_ACEOF
@@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@
test -n $ac_init_help exit $ac_status
if $ac_init_version; then
cat \_ACEOF
-sysprof configure 1.0.10
+sysprof configure 1.0.11
generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61
Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,
@@ -1339,7 +1339,7
Unblock request: gnome-chess 0.4.0-3
Hi, Please unblock gnome-chess 0.4.0-3. Fixes RC bug #503735 Here is the changelog entry: gnome-chess (0.4.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium [ Barry deFreese ] * Improve short description and fix typo in long. * Set urgency to medium for RC bug fix. * Update my e-mail address. * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. (No changes needed). [ Peter De Wachter ] * Added watch file. * Added dh_gconf in rules. (Closes: #472866) * Fixed localization bugs. (Closes: #503735) * Fixed a few other obvious bugs -- Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:45:07 -0400 Thank you, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unblock request: memtest86+
Hi, Please unblock memtest86+ as it closes an RC bug. Here is the changelog: memtest86+ (2.01-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Makefile: Use -O1 not -Os for gcc4.3. (Closes: #500818). * Make clean not ignore errors. -- Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:13:33 -0400 Thank you! Barry deFreese Shiny new DD -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unblock Request: liquidwar
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please unblock liquidwar. [...] * New upstream release. Ahem? Marc Yeah, that was a minor bug fix. I'm perfectly happy if it stays out of Lenny I guess. I got a little excitable on my first two uploads. This and sysfence. :( Sorry, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unblock Request: liquidwar
Hi, Please unblock liquidwar. I have hijacked it for the games team and have fixed several bugs and would appreicate it if it can go through. Here is my changelog: liquidwar http://packages.debian.org/src:liquidwar (5.6.4-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Barry deFreese ] * New maintainer. + Thanks to Alexandre Pineau for his work. + Set maintainer to Debian Games Team. * Acknowledge NMUs. (Closes: #392931 http://bugs.debian.org/392931, #472402 http://bugs.debian.org/472402). * New upstream release. * Add myself to uploaders. * Drop python-xml build-dep. (Closes: #468633 http://bugs.debian.org/468633). * Add Homepage entry. * Add VCS tags. * 030_desktop.diff - New patch. (Closes: #480327 http://bugs.debian.org/480327). + Thanks to Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals for the patch. * 040_nostrip.diff. Handle nostrip build options. (Closes: #437480 http://bugs.debian.org/437480). * Add watch file. * Make clean not ignore errors. * Fix debian/copyright file. * Fix doc base section. * Move DH_COMPAT to debian/compat. * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. (No changes needed). -- Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:23:56 -0400 Thank you! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unblock Request: sysfence
Hi, Please unblock sysfence. I just did a QA upload to fix and FTBFS with dash and a couple of other minor bugs. Here is the changelog entry: sysfence (0.16-2) unstable; urgency=low * QA upload. * Add quilt patch system. * 010_makefile_bashism.diff. Fix bashism. (Closes: #493411). * 020_makefile_strip.diff. Allow nostrip to work. (Closes: #438081). * Add watch file. * Bump debhelper build-dep and compat to 5. * Bump Standards Version to 3.8.0. (No changes needed). -- Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:50:00 -0400 Thank you! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please remove liquidwar from testing
Hi, While working on hijacking liquidwar for the games team I ran across some code that might be non-free. I have filed a Serious bug (See BTS #499317). But it probably shouldn't be shipped until I can get this resolved. Of course it has been like this for ages.. Thank you, Barry deFreese Soon to be DD? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please remove liquidwar from testing
Barry deFreese wrote: Hi, While working on hijacking liquidwar for the games team I ran across some code that might be non-free. I have filed a Serious bug (See BTS #499317). But it probably shouldn't be shipped until I can get this resolved. Of course it has been like this for ages.. Thank you, Barry deFreese Soon to be DD? Hi, My apologies, you can ignore this message. Someone pointed out to me that the offending code is actually dual-licensed and can be released under the GPL so I have closed the bug. Thank you, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
