Re: [libreoffice-design] [VOTE] ligatures in the logo
Agreed. Maybe I should save my efforts for the new, community-based logo ;-). 2011/3/16 Paulo José Amaro paul...@gmail.com Same here, B. Although, it's just because the kerning seems to be out of place without the other proposed changes, sadly. I think I'll not do help with that (and probably be counter-productive), but my personal taste is still for C [1]. ~Paulo [1] - http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/cgi_img_auth.php/f/f1/LogoImprovementStep2.png -- Paulo José O. Amaro Estudante de Ciência da Computação / UFSJ Webdesigner / Linked E.J. Blogueiro / CasaTwain.com 2011/3/15 Johannes Bausch johannes.bau...@gmail.com Yes, to be honest, I don't like that half-broken ligature either. Maybe I really should only do something about the kerning. 2011/3/15 Daniel Merker daniel.mer...@wayne.edu My vote: B Why: It seems that the other option is employing a style that isn't consistent across the entire logo; moreover, it doesn't seem to match anything else. -Daniel Merker On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Bernhard Dippold bernh...@familie-dippold.at wrote: Hi Joey, all I think we manage to finalize this task soon - great work, Joey! Johannes Bausch schrieb: Hey, following your discussion I added another draft - which is rather a step backward, but I see that the connected ligature is your main concern. If I understand the comments right, some people feel more comfortable with the distinct characters. In fluent text they probably would not have even mentioned the difference (except the more balanced general visual impression), but in comparison with the present logo they felt different. Thanks for taking these thoughts into account and to present a compromise containing all the other tiny modifications you included in order to create an improved visual impression. [...] I compared your last proposal with the current logo here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Logo_ligature.png (force reload) If anybody wants to be pointed to the differences, please have a look at Joey's userpage in the wiki (I won't provide the link here, but you'll find it). For me it is much more important to compare the general impression rather than the tiny modifications. So I ask you to vote on this comparison: Which logo is more balanced and expresses better the feelings we want to be associated with LibreOffice? And if you prefer the present logo: Should we include the other modifications except the ffi in the old logo? Best regards Bernhard PS: I don't vote now, because some people might look at the image already with my voting in mind which might influence their decision... -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-design] [VOTE] ligatures in the logo
B 2011/3/15 Bernhard Dippold bernh...@familie-dippold.at: Hi Joey, all I think we manage to finalize this task soon - great work, Joey! Johannes Bausch schrieb: Hey, following your discussion I added another draft - which is rather a step backward, but I see that the connected ligature is your main concern. If I understand the comments right, some people feel more comfortable with the distinct characters. In fluent text they probably would not have even mentioned the difference (except the more balanced general visual impression), but in comparison with the present logo they felt different. Thanks for taking these thoughts into account and to present a compromise containing all the other tiny modifications you included in order to create an improved visual impression. [...] I compared your last proposal with the current logo here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Logo_ligature.png (force reload) If anybody wants to be pointed to the differences, please have a look at Joey's userpage in the wiki (I won't provide the link here, but you'll find it). For me it is much more important to compare the general impression rather than the tiny modifications. So I ask you to vote on this comparison: Which logo is more balanced and expresses better the feelings we want to be associated with LibreOffice? And if you prefer the present logo: Should we include the other modifications except the ffi in the old logo? Best regards Bernhard PS: I don't vote now, because some people might look at the image already with my voting in mind which might influence their decision... -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- My sites: http://catalin-festila.blogspot.com -about me http://tv.free-tutorials.org - video tutorials http://python-catalin.blogspot.com - my python blog -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-design] [VOTE] ligatures in the logo
2011/3/15 Catalin catalinf...@gmail.com B I respect your answer, but it would be very helpful if you told us why you chose B over A =). @Bernhard: thanks. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
RE: [libreoffice-design] [VOTE] ligatures in the logo
My vote: B Why: It seems that the other option is employing a style that isn't consistent across the entire logo; moreover, it doesn't seem to match anything else. -Daniel Merker On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Bernhard Dippold bernh...@familie-dippold.at wrote: Hi Joey, all I think we manage to finalize this task soon - great work, Joey! Johannes Bausch schrieb: Hey, following your discussion I added another draft - which is rather a step backward, but I see that the connected ligature is your main concern. If I understand the comments right, some people feel more comfortable with the distinct characters. In fluent text they probably would not have even mentioned the difference (except the more balanced general visual impression), but in comparison with the present logo they felt different. Thanks for taking these thoughts into account and to present a compromise containing all the other tiny modifications you included in order to create an improved visual impression. [...] I compared your last proposal with the current logo here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Logo_ligature.png (force reload) If anybody wants to be pointed to the differences, please have a look at Joey's userpage in the wiki (I won't provide the link here, but you'll find it). For me it is much more important to compare the general impression rather than the tiny modifications. So I ask you to vote on this comparison: Which logo is more balanced and expresses better the feelings we want to be associated with LibreOffice? And if you prefer the present logo: Should we include the other modifications except the ffi in the old logo? Best regards Bernhard PS: I don't vote now, because some people might look at the image already with my voting in mind which might influence their decision... -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-design] [VOTE] ligatures in the logo
Same here, B. Although, it's just because the kerning seems to be out of place without the other proposed changes, sadly. I think I'll not do help with that (and probably be counter-productive), but my personal taste is still for C [1]. ~Paulo [1] - http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/cgi_img_auth.php/f/f1/LogoImprovementStep2.png -- Paulo José O. Amaro Estudante de Ciência da Computação / UFSJ Webdesigner / Linked E.J. Blogueiro / CasaTwain.com 2011/3/15 Johannes Bausch johannes.bau...@gmail.com Yes, to be honest, I don't like that half-broken ligature either. Maybe I really should only do something about the kerning. 2011/3/15 Daniel Merker daniel.mer...@wayne.edu My vote: B Why: It seems that the other option is employing a style that isn't consistent across the entire logo; moreover, it doesn't seem to match anything else. -Daniel Merker On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Bernhard Dippold bernh...@familie-dippold.at wrote: Hi Joey, all I think we manage to finalize this task soon - great work, Joey! Johannes Bausch schrieb: Hey, following your discussion I added another draft - which is rather a step backward, but I see that the connected ligature is your main concern. If I understand the comments right, some people feel more comfortable with the distinct characters. In fluent text they probably would not have even mentioned the difference (except the more balanced general visual impression), but in comparison with the present logo they felt different. Thanks for taking these thoughts into account and to present a compromise containing all the other tiny modifications you included in order to create an improved visual impression. [...] I compared your last proposal with the current logo here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Logo_ligature.png (force reload) If anybody wants to be pointed to the differences, please have a look at Joey's userpage in the wiki (I won't provide the link here, but you'll find it). For me it is much more important to compare the general impression rather than the tiny modifications. So I ask you to vote on this comparison: Which logo is more balanced and expresses better the feelings we want to be associated with LibreOffice? And if you prefer the present logo: Should we include the other modifications except the ffi in the old logo? Best regards Bernhard PS: I don't vote now, because some people might look at the image already with my voting in mind which might influence their decision... -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-design] [VOTE] ligatures in the logo
Hi Joey, all I think we manage to finalize this task soon - great work, Joey! Johannes Bausch schrieb: Hey, following your discussion I added another draft - which is rather a step backward, but I see that the connected ligature is your main concern. If I understand the comments right, some people feel more comfortable with the distinct characters. In fluent text they probably would not have even mentioned the difference (except the more balanced general visual impression), but in comparison with the present logo they felt different. Thanks for taking these thoughts into account and to present a compromise containing all the other tiny modifications you included in order to create an improved visual impression. [...] I compared your last proposal with the current logo here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Logo_ligature.png (force reload) If anybody wants to be pointed to the differences, please have a look at Joey's userpage in the wiki (I won't provide the link here, but you'll find it). For me it is much more important to compare the general impression rather than the tiny modifications. So I ask you to vote on this comparison: Which logo is more balanced and expresses better the feelings we want to be associated with LibreOffice? And if you prefer the present logo: Should we include the other modifications except the ffi in the old logo? Best regards Bernhard PS: I don't vote now, because some people might look at the image already with my voting in mind which might influence their decision... -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
