Re: Ivy JIRA issues - how do I subscribe?

[Stefan Bodewig]

On 2016-12-08, Stefan Bodewig wrote:

> On 2016-12-08, Jaikiran Pai wrote:

>> Is there a specific mailing list to where the Ivy JIRA issue
>> notifications go to?

> All tracker notifications (JIRA and Bugzilla) as well as scm commits and
> github PR notifications go to notificati...@ant.apache.org.

to which you subscribe by sending an email to
notifications-subscr...@ant.apache.org - sorry.

See also http://ant.apache.org/mail.html

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: Ivy JIRA issues - how do I subscribe?

[Stefan Bodewig]

On 2016-12-08, Jaikiran Pai wrote:

> Is there a specific mailing list to where the Ivy JIRA issue
> notifications go to?

All tracker notifications (JIRA and Bugzilla) as well as scm commits and
github PR notifications go to notificati...@ant.apache.org.

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

IvyDE status (Was: VOTE Retire IvyDE)

[Nicolas Lalevée]

I am forking the thread to not pollute the vote.

> Le 7 déc. 2016 à 19:56, Gintautas Grigelionis  a 
> écrit :
> 
> I decided to take a quick look at the build process and it's not broken per
> se, rather it's hardcoded to Eclipse SDK 3.7.1 foe Win32.

You confirm the doc is being correctly build ? If that effectively the case, it 
is good to know, thank you for looking into it.
But one thing is broken for sure: the Ant targets to build IvyDE for the 
release, because they still assert that the sources are being hosted in 
subversion.

> I would like to
> make the process to adapt to the build platform. Any suggestions for a
> reasonable Eclipse baseline? Should we target Java 8, that would be 4.5 (or
> maybe even 4.5.2).

Here is what is currently supported:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ivyde/history/trunk/compatibility.html 

It certainly can be reviewed.

As a general rule I would make IvyDE support the same version of the JVM as Ivy 
and Eclipse does. A thing to note is that some IvyDE users are installing it in 
their IBM RAD editor, so it would be nice to continue supporting if it doesn’t 
require much effort.

Nicolas

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

[Nicolas Lalevée]

Considering the current discussion around IvyDE and the involvement of Gintas, 
maybe we could cancel this vote, at least postpone it ?

Nicolas

> Le 5 déc. 2016 à 08:04, Jan Matèrne (jhm)  a écrit :
> 
> I start a vote for retiring IvyDE.
> 
> The last release was in 11/2013.
> 
> The last 'real' code activity was in 08/2014.
> 
> 
> 
> It seems that we havent the community, committers and PMC to hold this
> subproject. 
> 
> 
> 
> The general procedure is described in http://ant.apache.org/processes.html.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I start with my +1.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Jan
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

AW: VOTE Retire IvyDE

[jhm]

> Considering the current discussion around IvyDE and the involvement of
> Gintas, maybe we could cancel this vote, at least postpone it ?
> 
> Nicolas


Yes, I agree.
The discussion and the vote about retiring IvyDE had brought much more activity 
than the months before (as I recognized).

But I haven't found any rule about cancelling a vote. Until now we have 
collected enough +1s to archive IvyDE and I don't want to affront somebody.


Jan


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: VOTE Retire IvyDE

[Gintautas Grigelionis]

Very well, how does one revive a project?

Gintas

2016-12-08 21:01 GMT+01:00 Jan Matèrne (jhm) :

> > Considering the current discussion around IvyDE and the involvement of
> > Gintas, maybe we could cancel this vote, at least postpone it ?
> >
> > Nicolas
>
>
> Yes, I agree.
> The discussion and the vote about retiring IvyDE had brought much more
> activity than the months before (as I recognized).
>
> But I haven't found any rule about cancelling a vote. Until now we have
> collected enough +1s to archive IvyDE and I don't want to affront somebody.
>
>
> Jan
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
>
>

Re: IvyDE status (Was: VOTE Retire IvyDE)

[Gintautas Grigelionis]

AFAICS, Subversion is invoked in one of the targets connected to packaging
of a release, and I'm looking into an equivalent for Git.
What is more interesting is getting all Eclipse components. Current process
depends on finding a "good" mirror, and I'm tempted to investigate a
possibility to use updatesite resolver instead...

The point about using Java 8 is, you need at least Eclipse Mars (or the
other way around), period. And then there's all the GEF 4+ migration...

Gintas

2016-12-08 10:45 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Lalevée :

> I am forking the thread to not pollute the vote.
>
> > Le 7 déc. 2016 à 19:56, Gintautas Grigelionis 
> a écrit :
> >
> > I decided to take a quick look at the build process and it's not broken
> per
> > se, rather it's hardcoded to Eclipse SDK 3.7.1 foe Win32.
>
> You confirm the doc is being correctly build ? If that effectively the
> case, it is good to know, thank you for looking into it.
> But one thing is broken for sure: the Ant targets to build IvyDE for the
> release, because they still assert that the sources are being hosted in
> subversion.
>
> > I would like to
> > make the process to adapt to the build platform. Any suggestions for a
> > reasonable Eclipse baseline? Should we target Java 8, that would be 4.5
> (or
> > maybe even 4.5.2).
>
> Here is what is currently supported:
> http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ivyde/history/trunk/compatibility.html <
> http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ivyde/history/trunk/compatibility.html>
> It certainly can be reviewed.
>
> As a general rule I would make IvyDE support the same version of the JVM
> as Ivy and Eclipse does. A thing to note is that some IvyDE users are
> installing it in their IBM RAD editor, so it would be nice to continue
> supporting if it doesn’t require much effort.
>
> Nicolas
>
>

AW: VOTE Retire IvyDE

[jhm]

> Very well, how does one revive a project?
> 
> Gintas

If you ask for the process of reactivating it after archiving, that's 
documented at http://ant.apache.org/processes.html.
But ATM it is still alive - but sleeping. ;-)

Jan 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org