Re: Possible to call Apache expression processor from module?
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:04 AM, oh...@cox.net wrote: Hi, I'm starting to work on a new module, and part of the functionality that I'd like to incorporate would involve processing Apache-type expressions to produce a true/false result that my module would then use to decide what to do, in some cases. So, I was wondering if there is some API or interface that is exposed in Apache that would allow my module to pass the interface an expression, and get a return result of true/false? I'm not sure if what I'm trying to explain is very clear, but if not, please let me know and I'll try again. You might look at how mod_rewrite uses ap_expr_* (from include/ap_expr.h) in trunk or 2.4. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
Re: Possible to call Apache expression processor from module?
Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:04 AM, oh...@cox.net wrote: Hi, I'm starting to work on a new module, and part of the functionality that I'd like to incorporate would involve processing Apache-type expressions to produce a true/false result that my module would then use to decide what to do, in some cases. So, I was wondering if there is some API or interface that is exposed in Apache that would allow my module to pass the interface an expression, and get a return result of true/false? I'm not sure if what I'm trying to explain is very clear, but if not, please let me know and I'll try again. You might look at how mod_rewrite uses ap_expr_* (from include/ap_expr.h) in trunk or 2.4. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com Eric, Thanks for the pointer. I'll take a look at that. Jim
Re: Possible to call Apache expression processor from module?
oh...@cox.net wrote: Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:04 AM, oh...@cox.net wrote: Hi, I'm starting to work on a new module, and part of the functionality that I'd like to incorporate would involve processing Apache-type expressions to produce a true/false result that my module would then use to decide what to do, in some cases. So, I was wondering if there is some API or interface that is exposed in Apache that would allow my module to pass the interface an expression, and get a return result of true/false? I'm not sure if what I'm trying to explain is very clear, but if not, please let me know and I'll try again. You might look at how mod_rewrite uses ap_expr_* (from include/ap_expr.h) in trunk or 2.4. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com Eric, Thanks for the pointer. I'll take a look at that. Jim Hi, Is the ap_expr.h (and associated functionality only available in 2.4+? And it's not available in 2.2.x? Thanks, Jim
Re: svn commit: r1431215 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
On 01/10/2013 10:17 AM, fua...@apache.org wrote: Author: fuankg Date: Thu Jan 10 09:17:18 2013 New Revision: 1431215 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1431215view=rev Log: vote. Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1431215r1=1431214r2=1431215view=diff == --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Jan 10 09:17:18 2013 @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: 2.4.x patch: http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/lua_dbd.patch + CHANGES +1: humbedooh + -1: fuankg - we 1st need some workarounds for stupid CodeWarrior compiler. * configure --with-modules: - Fix shell errors when trying to AC_MSG_RESULT(). How am I supposed to write a workaround for a compiler I apparently can't run on any of my computers (and also have to pay for?)? Can you provide me with the errors that it produces, or some tips on how I can possibly run this compiler on my own computer? Otherwise, I really don't know what to do here - the bindings work fine on all the machines I've tested them on. With regards, Daniel.
Re: svn commit: r1431215 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Hi Daniel, Am 10.01.2013 10:34, schrieb Daniel Gruno: Can you provide me with the errors that it produces, or some tips on how I can possibly run this compiler on my own computer? Otherwise, I really don't know what to do here - the bindings work fine on all the machines I've tested them on. meanwhile all clarfied; I was writing the mail to you just after I did mention the prob in STATUS; just wanted to avoid that the backport takes place without a workaround. Thanks for your quick coding! Gün.
Re: svn commit: r1431215 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
On 01/10/2013 01:52 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi Daniel, Am 10.01.2013 10:34, schrieb Daniel Gruno: Can you provide me with the errors that it produces, or some tips on how I can possibly run this compiler on my own computer? Otherwise, I really don't know what to do here - the bindings work fine on all the machines I've tested them on. meanwhile all clarfied; I was writing the mail to you just after I did mention the prob in STATUS; just wanted to avoid that the backport takes place without a workaround. Thanks for your quick coding! Gün. Yeah, it did seem a bit funny that those emails arrived at about the same time. I've done some manual pushing of functions now, that work just as well - the 3D array was really just a convenient way of pushing everything, and a standard Lua-C practice. Hopefully we won't get any more compiler errors :) With regards, Daniel.
Re: svn commit: r1431331 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
On 10.01.2013 14:01, j...@apache.org wrote: Author: jim Date: Thu Jan 10 13:01:46 2013 New Revision: 1431331 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1431331view=rev Log: Merge r1418524 from trunk: Use ap_rputs instead of ap_rvputs where applicable. Submitted by: jailletc36 Reviewed/backported by: jim Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS It seems the actual merge is missing. The commit only contains STATUS changes. Regards, Rainer
Re: svn commit: r1431331 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Forget this, it was already backported as part of 1420696. Sorry for the noise. Rainer On 10.01.2013 14:18, Rainer Jung wrote: On 10.01.2013 14:01, j...@apache.org wrote: Author: jim Date: Thu Jan 10 13:01:46 2013 New Revision: 1431331 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1431331view=rev Log: Merge r1418524 from trunk: Use ap_rputs instead of ap_rvputs where applicable. Submitted by: jailletc36 Reviewed/backported by: jim Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS It seems the actual merge is missing. The commit only contains STATUS changes. Regards, Rainer
Re: event mpm and mod_status
To reiterate back to the event mpm / mod_status integration, are there
any work in progress on implementing a more verbose status display for
the event mpm? I'm thinking of something that can show all requests
currently being processed like we have today for prefork/worker. The
current thread status thingie is probably interesting too, but more
from a developer/server diag point of view.
How hitech does it have to be? Would using mod_socache for storage be
a reasonable way to do it? Personally I find it a bit rough around the
edges (no locking for example, so all users have to use a single big
lock for all access), but perhaps it's good enough anyway?
As it stands this seems to be the only blocker for us trying to use
the event mpm for file archive serving, so if there's any work being
done on the subject I'm very interested :)
/Nikke
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {acc,hpc2n}.umu.se | ni...@acc.umu.se
---
Old Vulcan Proverb Only Nixon could go to China
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Re: svn commit: r1431215 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Hi Daniel, On 1/10/2013 4:55 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 01/10/2013 01:52 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi Daniel, Am 10.01.2013 10:34, schrieb Daniel Gruno: Can you provide me with the errors that it produces, or some tips on how I can possibly run this compiler on my own computer? Otherwise, I really don't know what to do here - the bindings work fine on all the machines I've tested them on. Unfortunately, all the lua_pushcfunctions are nightmarish on Windows from .\lua_dbd.c(662) : error C2440: 'function' : cannot convert from 'int (__stdcall *)(lua_State *)' to 'lua_CFunction' to .\lua_dbd.c(692) : error C2440: 'function' : cannot convert from 'int (__stdcall *)(lua_State *)' to 'lua_CFunction' Casting the int function to lua_CFunction seems to work. Your 2.4 patch seems to be missing this part of r1430225 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/lua/mod_lua.dsp?r1=1430225r2=1430224pathrev=1430225 On a side note there's this, not sure how long that's been there, it just seems wrong not having a 'case' return something. c:\build2\httpd-2.4.x_r1431331\modules\lua\mod_lua.c(110) : warning C4715: 'scope_to_string' : not all control paths return a value Cheers, Gregg
Re: svn commit: r1431215 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
On 1/10/2013 1:33 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: Your 2.4 patch seems to be missing this part of r1430225 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/lua/mod_lua.dsp?r1=1430225r2=1430224pathrev=1430225 This is also needed http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1431681
Re: svn commit: r1431215 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
On 01/10/2013 10:33 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: Hi Daniel, On 1/10/2013 4:55 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 01/10/2013 01:52 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi Daniel, Am 10.01.2013 10:34, schrieb Daniel Gruno: Can you provide me with the errors that it produces, or some tips on how I can possibly run this compiler on my own computer? Otherwise, I really don't know what to do here - the bindings work fine on all the machines I've tested them on. Unfortunately, all the lua_pushcfunctions are nightmarish on Windows from .\lua_dbd.c(662) : error C2440: 'function' : cannot convert from 'int (__stdcall *)(lua_State *)' to 'lua_CFunction' to .\lua_dbd.c(692) : error C2440: 'function' : cannot convert from 'int (__stdcall *)(lua_State *)' to 'lua_CFunction' Casting the int function to lua_CFunction seems to work. Your 2.4 patch seems to be missing this part of r1430225 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/lua/mod_lua.dsp?r1=1430225r2=1430224pathrev=1430225 On a side note there's this, not sure how long that's been there, it just seems wrong not having a 'case' return something. c:\build2\httpd-2.4.x_r1431331\modules\lua\mod_lua.c(110) : warning C4715: 'scope_to_string' : not all control paths return a value Cheers, Gregg Why can't we just make httpd run on UNIX and say that that's it ;) sigh, I guess I have to do some more work on this ting today, thanks for letting me know :) It's appreciated that people actually try these things out and give such good feedback as is given on the http project. With regards, Daniel.
Re: svn commit: r1431215 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
On 01/10/2013 10:33 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On a side note there's this, not sure how long that's been there, it just seems wrong not having a 'case' return something. c:\build2\httpd-2.4.x_r1431331\modules\lua\mod_lua.c(110) : warning C4715: 'scope_to_string' : not all control paths return a value Cheers, Gregg That's been fixed in trunk with r1422373, just fyi (though probably not just backportable, as it was part of a larger fix to trunk code). It's not a real issue though, but yeah, it doesn't hurt to make compilers happy (most of the time). With regards, Daniel.
