Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-26 Thread Jorg Schmidt 

> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] 

> I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
> release manager :)
> [...]
> Comments? Feedback?

I am ready for the translation of the release notes into German.

We should remember to take care in time to the organization (creation and
translation) of the press release.


greetings,
Jorg


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-25 Thread Jim Jagielski 

> On May 25, 2017, at 3:04 AM, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
> 
> On 24/05/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
>> release manager :)
> 
> OK, perfect!
> 
>> As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the
>> latest.
> 
> I don't think next week is realistic, since the process takes longer. Still, 
> if the idea is to get 4.1.4 out as soon as (realistically) possible, then I 
> totally agree.

Sorry, I meant kicking off the "official" release process... 
using shorthand terminology between projects isn't advised :)
> 
>> I'll be doing macOS/OSX build and can also do the CentOS 5 32/64 bit
>> ones as well (rpm and deb), if required.
> 
> I had provided my Linux builds for earlier testing and they worked. But let's 
> consolidate: so I will retire mine and start using your builds as soon as you 
> make them available in all languages. I will still be available as a backup 
> in case we need Linux builds, but it is easier (for upload) if the Release 
> Manager builds as much as possible on his own infrastructure.
> 
> Regards,
>  Andrea.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-25 Thread Matthias Seidel 
That was the link I was looking for! ;-)

Will try the ones from 4.1.2 in my next build.

Regards, Matthias


Am 25.05.2017 um 08:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 24/05/2017 Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> As I said before, these are most likely not the official build options,
>> but they work (for me).
>
> Release options are here:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/
>
> The ones from 4.1.2 are correct, the ones from 4.1.3 are not (so
> please base on the 4.1.2 ones).
>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-25 Thread Andrea Pescetti 

On 24/05/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote:

I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
release manager :)


OK, perfect!


As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the
latest.


I don't think next week is realistic, since the process takes longer. 
Still, if the idea is to get 4.1.4 out as soon as (realistically) 
possible, then I totally agree.



I'll be doing macOS/OSX build and can also do the CentOS 5 32/64 bit
ones as well (rpm and deb), if required.


I had provided my Linux builds for earlier testing and they worked. But 
let's consolidate: so I will retire mine and start using your builds as 
soon as you make them available in all languages. I will still be 
available as a backup in case we need Linux builds, but it is easier 
(for upload) if the Release Manager builds as much as possible on his 
own infrastructure.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-25 Thread Andrea Pescetti 

On 24/05/2017 Matthias Seidel wrote:

As I said before, these are most likely not the official build options,
but they work (for me).


Release options are here:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/

The ones from 4.1.2 are correct, the ones from 4.1.3 are not (so please 
base on the 4.1.2 ones).


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-24 Thread Matthias Seidel 
Good to know...

Time to update the Release Schedule on cWiki? ;-)

Regards, Matthias


Am 24.05.2017 um 20:37 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 24.05.2017 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
>> release manager :)
>
> yes, you are. There was no vote or other formal process. Just a
> proposal and nobody objected. So, sometimes it comes fast and easy. :-)
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>> As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the
>> latest. Last I checked, there were no remaining blockers for
>> 4.1.4. As such, HEAD of
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO414/
>> represents what will turn into the likely release.
>>
>> I'll be doing macOS/OSX build and can also do the CentOS 5 32/64 bit
>> ones as well (rpm and deb), if required.
>>
>> Comments? Feedback?
>>
>>> On May 23, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Raphael Bircher
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim
>>>
>>> Am .05.2017, 15:53 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>>>
 I am going thru the proposed blockers in anticipation of a AOO 4.1.4
 release. I have not approved the 2 graphics-related mods, simply
 because even though they look like they might be easy, I don't
 want to subject ourselves to the risk, even as small as it might
 be. Plus, good PR for 4.2.0.
>>>
>>> I'm fine with this. From the release criteria point of view it's not
>>> really a blocker.
>>>
>>> Does this also mean, that you take over the Release Nanager?
>>>
>>> Regards, Raphael
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-24 Thread Marcus 

Am 24.05.2017 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
release manager :)


yes, you are. There was no vote or other formal process. Just a proposal 
and nobody objected. So, sometimes it comes fast and easy. :-)


Marcus




As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the
latest. Last I checked, there were no remaining blockers for
4.1.4. As such, HEAD of http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO414/
represents what will turn into the likely release.

I'll be doing macOS/OSX build and can also do the CentOS 5 32/64 bit
ones as well (rpm and deb), if required.

Comments? Feedback?


On May 23, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Raphael Bircher  wrote:

Hi Jim

Am .05.2017, 15:53 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski :


I am going thru the proposed blockers in anticipation of a AOO 4.1.4
release. I have not approved the 2 graphics-related mods, simply
because even though they look like they might be easy, I don't
want to subject ourselves to the risk, even as small as it might
be. Plus, good PR for 4.2.0.


I'm fine with this. From the release criteria point of view it's not really a 
blocker.

Does this also mean, that you take over the Release Nanager?

Regards, Raphael



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-24 Thread Peter Kovacs 
Awesome! 


Am 24. Mai 2017 14:06:17 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
>release manager :)
>
>As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the
>latest. Last I checked, there were no remaining blockers for
>4.1.4. As such, HEAD of
>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO414/
>represents what will turn into the likely release.
>
>I'll be doing macOS/OSX build and can also do the CentOS 5 32/64 bit
>ones as well (rpm and deb), if required.
>
>Comments? Feedback?
>
>> On May 23, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Raphael Bircher
> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jim
>> 
>> Am .05.2017, 15:53 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>> 
>>> I am going thru the proposed blockers in anticipation of a AOO 4.1.4
>>> release. I have not approved the 2 graphics-related mods, simply
>>> because even though they look like they might be easy, I don't
>>> want to subject ourselves to the risk, even as small as it might
>>> be. Plus, good PR for 4.2.0.
>> 
>> I'm fine with this. From the release criteria point of view it's not
>really a blocker.
>> 
>> Does this also mean, that you take over the Release Nanager?
>> 
>> Regards, Raphael
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-24 Thread Matthias Seidel 
Hi Raphael,

SDK_PATH="/cygdrive/c/Microsoft_SDKs/Windows/v7.0"
./configure \
--with-frame-home="$SDK_PATH" \
--with-psdk-home="$SDK_PATH" \
--with-midl-path="$SDK_PATH/bin" \
--with-ant-home="/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.9" \
--with-jdk-home="C:/PROGRA~1/Java/JDK17~1.0_8" \
--with-csc-path="C:/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v3.5" \
--with-cl-home="C:/PROGRA~1/MICROS~1.0/VC" \
--with-asm-home="C:/PROGRA~1/MICROS~1.0/VC/bin" \
   
--with-dmake-url="https://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2;
\
   
--with-epm-url="https://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz;
\
--with-directx-home="C:/Microsoft_DirectX_SDK_June_2010" \
--disable-nss-module \
--without-junit \
--disable-pch \
--disable-atl \
--disable-activex \
--enable-category-b \
--with-lang="en-US de pt ja" \
--enable-bundled-dictionaries \
--with-nsis-path="C:/NSIS"

I followed the steps in our Wiki and avoided spaces in the path. The
shortened Windows paths may also differ for your system.

As I said before, these are most likely not the official build options,
but they work (for me).

Regards, Matthias


Am 24.05.2017 um 17:56 schrieb Raphael Bircher:
> Hi Matthias
>
> Am .05.2017, 16:21 Uhr, schrieb Matthias Seidel
> :
>
>> Hi Raphael,
>>
>> I did manage to build 4.1.4 (en-US, de, ja, pt) on Windows 7, although I
>> am not sure if I use the correct configure.
>> (Andrea did post a link some time ago, but I am not able to it...)
>>
>> What is PSDK referring to?
> I think, I massed up the installation of the SDK's
>
> Can you post the configuration of your builds?
>
> Regards, Raphael
>
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-24 Thread Raphael Bircher 

Hi Matthias

Am .05.2017, 16:21 Uhr, schrieb Matthias Seidel  
:



Hi Raphael,

I did manage to build 4.1.4 (en-US, de, ja, pt) on Windows 7, although I
am not sure if I use the correct configure.
(Andrea did post a link some time ago, but I am not able to it...)

What is PSDK referring to?

I think, I massed up the installation of the SDK's

Can you post the configuration of your builds?

Regards, Raphael


--
My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-24 Thread Matthias Seidel 
Hi Raphael,

I did manage to build 4.1.4 (en-US, de, ja, pt) on Windows 7, although I
am not sure if I use the correct configure.
(Andrea did post a link some time ago, but I am not able to it...)

What is PSDK referring to?

Matthias

P.S.: I followed this guide:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7.2C_Windows_8.1.2C_Windows_10


Am 24.05.2017 um 15:09 schrieb Raphael Bircher:
> Hi All
>
> I have still a fight with the Windows SDK. For some reasons, PSDK is
> not recognized.
>
> Regards, Raphael
>
> Am .05.2017, 14:06 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
>> I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
>> release manager :)
>>
>> As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the
>> latest. Last I checked, there were no remaining blockers for
>> 4.1.4. As such, HEAD of
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO414/
>> represents what will turn into the likely release.
>>
>> I'll be doing macOS/OSX build and can also do the CentOS 5 32/64 bit
>> ones as well (rpm and deb), if required.
>>
>> Comments? Feedback?
>>
>>> On May 23, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Raphael Bircher
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim
>>>
>>> Am .05.2017, 15:53 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>>>
 I am going thru the proposed blockers in anticipation of a AOO 4.1.4
 release. I have not approved the 2 graphics-related mods, simply
 because even though they look like they might be easy, I don't
 want to subject ourselves to the risk, even as small as it might
 be. Plus, good PR for 4.2.0.
>>>
>>> I'm fine with this. From the release criteria point of view it's not
>>> really a blocker.
>>>
>>> Does this also mean, that you take over the Release Nanager?
>>>
>>> Regards, Raphael
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-24 Thread Raphael Bircher 

Hi All

I have still a fight with the Windows SDK. For some reasons, PSDK is not  
recognized.


Regards, Raphael

Am .05.2017, 14:06 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski :


I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
release manager :)

As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the
latest. Last I checked, there were no remaining blockers for
4.1.4. As such, HEAD of  
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO414/

represents what will turn into the likely release.

I'll be doing macOS/OSX build and can also do the CentOS 5 32/64 bit
ones as well (rpm and deb), if required.

Comments? Feedback?

On May 23, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Raphael Bircher  
 wrote:


Hi Jim

Am .05.2017, 15:53 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski :


I am going thru the proposed blockers in anticipation of a AOO 4.1.4
release. I have not approved the 2 graphics-related mods, simply
because even though they look like they might be easy, I don't
want to subject ourselves to the risk, even as small as it might
be. Plus, good PR for 4.2.0.


I'm fine with this. From the release criteria point of view it's not  
really a blocker.


Does this also mean, that you take over the Release Nanager?

Regards, Raphael


--
My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




--
My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-24 Thread Jim Jagielski 
I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
release manager :)

As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the
latest. Last I checked, there were no remaining blockers for
4.1.4. As such, HEAD of http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO414/
represents what will turn into the likely release.

I'll be doing macOS/OSX build and can also do the CentOS 5 32/64 bit
ones as well (rpm and deb), if required.

Comments? Feedback?

> On May 23, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Raphael Bircher  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim
> 
> Am .05.2017, 15:53 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski :
> 
>> I am going thru the proposed blockers in anticipation of a AOO 4.1.4
>> release. I have not approved the 2 graphics-related mods, simply
>> because even though they look like they might be easy, I don't
>> want to subject ourselves to the risk, even as small as it might
>> be. Plus, good PR for 4.2.0.
> 
> I'm fine with this. From the release criteria point of view it's not really a 
> blocker.
> 
> Does this also mean, that you take over the Release Nanager?
> 
> Regards, Raphael
> 
> 
> -- 
> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-23 Thread Raphael Bircher 

Hi Jim

Am .05.2017, 15:53 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski :


I am going thru the proposed blockers in anticipation of a AOO 4.1.4
release. I have not approved the 2 graphics-related mods, simply
because even though they look like they might be easy, I don't
want to subject ourselves to the risk, even as small as it might
be. Plus, good PR for 4.2.0.


I'm fine with this. From the release criteria point of view it's not  
really a blocker.


Does this also mean, that you take over the Release Nanager?

Regards, Raphael


--
My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org