Re: spamassassin 3.4.5 wide chars

2021-09-05 Thread Loren Wilton
I don't recall your problem, but note that 3.4.6 was a very hasty update to 
3.4.5 to correct some problems that showed up with some rules a day or so 
after 3.4.5 was created. If things worked before 3.4.5 and fail in rules 
wiht 3.4.5, I'd suggest that 3.4.6 may be the correct solution.


   Loren


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com



Re: spamassassin 3.4.5 wide chars

2021-09-05 Thread Benny Pedersen

On 2021-09-05 19:02, John Wilcock wrote:


https://bugs.gentoo.org/807781



I've no idea what the origin of this issue is, just that it occurs for
you with 3.4.5 and that it doesn't appear for me on 3.4.6.


we could compare perl modules ?, if you use gentoo its not that, but if 
its another distro not showing the problem i like to fully have that 
reported on above url


i know slackware 14.2 does not show the problem, i know its not perl 
version issue atleast, in that regard the problem is stable :=)



I trust spamassassin sufficiently to unmask it; I've no idea why the
gentoo package maintainer thinks it isn't stable-worthy.


i just wish minimal requirement was updated so atleast some of the 
problems could be solved, i know spamassassin runs on many diffrent 
os'es, but that should imho not allow for weekness, perl code should not 
give warning if its stable


and yes even the default rule set shows the problem here

is it normalise charset related ?, or maybe even unicode support ?

more info would be good if it is possible


Re: spamassassin 3.4.5 wide chars

2021-09-05 Thread John Wilcock

Le 03/09/2021 à 19:16, Benny Pedersen a écrit :


On 2021-09-03 18:12, John Wilcock wrote:
FWIW, I see no warning with today's rules on SA 3.4.6 and perl 5.34 
on gentoo.


Benny, why don't you simply upgrade to 3.4.6? Sure, it hasn't yet been
marked as stable by the gentoo maintainers, but it works perfectly.


3.4.6-r1 is masked unstable, so this is indeed fix perl 5.34 issue ?

https://bugs.gentoo.org/807781



I've no idea what the origin of this issue is, just that it occurs for 
you with 3.4.5 and that it doesn't appear for me on 3.4.6.


I trust spamassassin sufficiently to unmask it; I've no idea why the 
gentoo package maintainer thinks it isn't stable-worthy.


--
John



Re: spamassassin 3.4.5 wide chars

2021-09-03 Thread Benny Pedersen

On 2021-09-03 18:12, John Wilcock wrote:
FWIW, I see no warning with today's rules on SA 3.4.6 and perl 5.34 on 
gentoo.


Benny, why don't you simply upgrade to 3.4.6? Sure, it hasn't yet been
marked as stable by the gentoo maintainers, but it works perfectly.


3.4.6-r1 is masked unstable, so this is indeed fix perl 5.34 issue ?

https://bugs.gentoo.org/807781


Re: spamassassin 3.4.5 wide chars

2021-09-03 Thread John Wilcock
FWIW, I see no warning with today's rules on SA 3.4.6 and perl 5.34 on 
gentoo.


Benny, why don't you simply upgrade to 3.4.6? Sure, it hasn't yet been 
marked as stable by the gentoo maintainers, but it works perfectly.


--
John

Le 03/09/2021 à 16:37, Benny Pedersen a écrit :

On 2021-08-12 04:03, Benny Pedersen wrote:

https://bugs.gentoo.org/807781

is it solved in 3.4.6 ?


reply to myself if its matters, rule sets from current sa-update today 
is now showing this wide charters warning


step to reproduce in gentoo:

sa-update
sa-compile

before sa-compile call re2c its shown 2 warning lines

spamassassin version 3.4.5
perl version 5.34

from one of my friends with slackware 14.2 its not a problem with perl 
5.22


slackware current have perl 5.34 aswell, but i dont use slackware :=)

seems pmc members does not either

spamassassin should be stable from perl 5.8 and upwards, but its not :/



Re: spamassassin 3.4.5 wide chars

2021-09-03 Thread Benny Pedersen

On 2021-08-12 04:03, Benny Pedersen wrote:

https://bugs.gentoo.org/807781

is it solved in 3.4.6 ?


reply to myself if its matters, rule sets from current sa-update today 
is now showing this wide charters warning


step to reproduce in gentoo:

sa-update
sa-compile

before sa-compile call re2c its shown 2 warning lines

spamassassin version 3.4.5
perl version 5.34

from one of my friends with slackware 14.2 its not a problem with perl 
5.22


slackware current have perl 5.34 aswell, but i dont use slackware :=)

seems pmc members does not either

spamassassin should be stable from perl 5.8 and upwards, but its not :/



Re: spamassassin 3.4.5 wide chars

2021-08-16 Thread Bill Cole
On 2021-08-11 at 22:03:24 UTC-0400 (Thu, 12 Aug 2021 04:03:24 +0200)
Benny Pedersen 
is rumored to have said:

> https://bugs.gentoo.org/807781
>
> is it solved in 3.4.6 ?

That's not a SA bug report. It's a Gentoo bug report.

Fix your rules.


-- 
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire


RE: spamassassin 3.4.5 wide chars

2021-08-13 Thread Lukasz Maik
Thank you all for your best help.

I will investigate.

Kind Regards
Lukas
Ricoh Europe Holdings PLC is a company registered in England, under company 
number 06273215, with a registered office at 20 Triton Street, London, NW1 3BF. 
The UK business of Ricoh Europe Holdings PLC is operated by: (i) Ricoh Europe 
PLC, a company registered in England under company number 00720944, with a 
registered office at 20 Triton Street, London, NW1 3BF; (ii) Ricoh UK Limited, 
a company registered in England under company number 01271033, with a 
registered office at Ricoh House, 800 Pavilion Drive, Northampton, NN4 7YL; and 
(iii) Ricoh Capital Limited, a company registered in England under company 
number 03001351, with a registered office at 20 Triton Street, London, NW1 3BF 
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail


Re: spamassassin 3.4.5 wide chars

2021-08-12 Thread Benny Pedersen

On 2021-08-12 04:55, Bill Cole wrote:

On 2021-08-11 at 22:03:24 UTC-0400 (Thu, 12 Aug 2021 04:03:24 +0200)
Benny Pedersen 
is rumored to have said:


https://bugs.gentoo.org/807781

is it solved in 3.4.6 ?


That's not a SA bug report. It's a Gentoo bug report.

Fix your rules.


thanks for being friendly