Re: Volunteers page

2011-01-29 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Website updated.
Please let me know if something doesn't work.


On 28 January 2011 08:06, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
 2011/1/28 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com:
 Anyway I published the new version of the struts website on my publilc
 html folder [6] please take a look and let me know if there is
 something wrong.

 Minor update to the downloads page


 Regards
 --
 Łukasz
 + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
 Kapituła Javarsovia http://javarsovia.pl

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org





-- 
Maurizio Cucchiara

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: Volunteers page

2011-01-27 Thread John Lindal
Rather than deleting it, I moved /volunteers.html to my home directory, just in 
case somebody really still wants it.  Not sure how long it takes for the change 
to be visible.

John


On 1/26/11 9:11 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote:

There should be no problem to delete it. We have to take care only of
two pages according to google [1]
I have already updated the announcement one. I also upgraded the site
plugin, from now it won't ignore paragraph format (take a look at the
differences between [2] and [3]).
Does anyone know if mvn site:deploy goal works? are there any side
effects (like file system permissions)?
or I have to deploy by hand?

[1] 
http://www.google.it/search?as_lq=http%3A%2F%2Fstruts.apache.org%2Fvolunteers.htmlhl=itbtnG=Cerca
[2] http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html#craigmcc
[3] http://struts.apache.org/dev/volunteers.html#craigmcc
On 27 January 2011 04:33, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
 maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 What do you think if we simply replace the old page with a symlink which
 points to the update version?

 I see no reason to do that. It's an old, obsolete page, in the wrong
 location. The location also predates the ASF requirement that dev
 pages live only within the dev section of the site.

 Let's just maintain the site we actually want instead of preserving
 cruft just because it's there.

 --
 Martin Cooper


 Maurizio Cucchiara

 On Jan 26, 2011 8:08 PM, John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
 Google lists only 4 pages that link to the old /volunteers.html:


 http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.htmlhl=en

 If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and delete it.

 I tried building the site from source, but it gave me errors, so I'll leave
 that alone :)

 Thanks,
 John



 On 1/25/11 9:03 PM, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:

 Hmm. The first one is very old (l...


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org





--
Maurizio Cucchiara

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org




Re: Volunteers page

2011-01-27 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Some things are never easy as they seem :)
Upgrading the site plugin to 2.2 is worth it:
* it includes some cool stuff like chmod parameter, etc
* it generates a more clean and reliably html code (compare [1] and
[2] how to create a patch, perhaps the right title should be how to
create a patch in this way :) )

Things that I changed:
* I removed the ApacheCon logo, I think it's been a long time since
November (furthermore my firefox showed it in a wrong way).
* I also noticed that the date format on left-top page is changed, but
I think it sounds like a plugin-improvement, doesn't it?.
* Another thing I realized is that the nightly build section [3]
contains a broken link. There is a dedicated bash script [4], but it
is a 4 years old script, it is almost ready to go to primary school. I
could take a look at this and try to rearrange it, but what do you
think if we drive the user to latest build on hudson?

Anyway I published the new version of the struts website on my publilc
html folder [6] please take a look and let me know if there is
something wrong.

Over and out.

[1] http://struts.apache.org/helping.html#patches
[2] http://people.apache.org/~mcucchiara/site/helping.html#patches
[3] http://struts.apache.org/dev/builds.html#NightlyBuilds
[4] 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/maven/trunk/scripts/nightly/nightly-2.0.x.sh?view=log
[5] 
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Struts2/org.apache.struts$struts2-assembly/lastBuild/
[6] http://people.apache.org/~mcucchiara/site/index.html
On 27 January 2011 21:30, John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
 Rather than deleting it, I moved /volunteers.html to my home directory, just 
 in case somebody really still wants it.  Not sure how long it takes for the 
 change to be visible.

 John


 On 1/26/11 9:11 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote:

 There should be no problem to delete it. We have to take care only of
 two pages according to google [1]
 I have already updated the announcement one. I also upgraded the site
 plugin, from now it won't ignore paragraph format (take a look at the
 differences between [2] and [3]).
 Does anyone know if mvn site:deploy goal works? are there any side
 effects (like file system permissions)?
 or I have to deploy by hand?

 [1] 
 http://www.google.it/search?as_lq=http%3A%2F%2Fstruts.apache.org%2Fvolunteers.htmlhl=itbtnG=Cerca
 [2] http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html#craigmcc
 [3] http://struts.apache.org/dev/volunteers.html#craigmcc
 On 27 January 2011 04:33, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
 maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 What do you think if we simply replace the old page with a symlink which
 points to the update version?

 I see no reason to do that. It's an old, obsolete page, in the wrong
 location. The location also predates the ASF requirement that dev
 pages live only within the dev section of the site.

 Let's just maintain the site we actually want instead of preserving
 cruft just because it's there.

 --
 Martin Cooper


 Maurizio Cucchiara

 On Jan 26, 2011 8:08 PM, John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
 Google lists only 4 pages that link to the old /volunteers.html:


 http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.htmlhl=en

 If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and delete it.

 I tried building the site from source, but it gave me errors, so I'll leave
 that alone :)

 Thanks,
 John



 On 1/25/11 9:03 PM, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:

 Hmm. The first one is very old (l...


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org





 --
 Maurizio Cucchiara

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org






-- 
Maurizio Cucchiara

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: Volunteers page

2011-01-27 Thread Martin Cooper
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 Some things are never easy as they seem :)
 Upgrading the site plugin to 2.2 is worth it:
 * it includes some cool stuff like chmod parameter, etc
 * it generates a more clean and reliably html code (compare [1] and
 [2] how to create a patch, perhaps the right title should be how to
 create a patch in this way :) )

 Things that I changed:
 * I removed the ApacheCon logo, I think it's been a long time since
 November (furthermore my firefox showed it in a wrong way).

I have a vague recollection that the ApacheCon logo addition / removal
was supposed to happen automagically, driven by the concom people.
Given that it's still there, either my memory is faulty, we didn't
adopt whatever was supposed to give them control, or they (concom)
forgot or changed their minds about it. Anyway, taking it off is fine
with me.

 * I also noticed that the date format on left-top page is changed, but
 I think it sounds like a plugin-improvement, doesn't it?.

It looked like the default has been changed to the ISO standard date
format. That's fine.

 * Another thing I realized is that the nightly build section [3]
 contains a broken link. There is a dedicated bash script [4], but it
 is a 4 years old script, it is almost ready to go to primary school. I
 could take a look at this and try to rearrange it, but what do you
 think if we drive the user to latest build on hudson?

Ah, the nightly build is probably the one that used to run on the
helios zone, which no longer exists (and hasn't for a while). We could
point to Hudson if we think we need to make such builds available, or
we can just let folks build it themselves. (These days, with Maven,
that's not a big deal, IMO; it was a serious pain back in the early
1.x days, with the Ant builds.)

 Anyway I published the new version of the struts website on my publilc
 html folder [6] please take a look and let me know if there is
 something wrong.

I took a quick look, and it seems okay to me.

--
Martin Cooper


 Over and out.

 [1] http://struts.apache.org/helping.html#patches
 [2] http://people.apache.org/~mcucchiara/site/helping.html#patches
 [3] http://struts.apache.org/dev/builds.html#NightlyBuilds
 [4] 
 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/maven/trunk/scripts/nightly/nightly-2.0.x.sh?view=log
 [5] 
 https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Struts2/org.apache.struts$struts2-assembly/lastBuild/
 [6] http://people.apache.org/~mcucchiara/site/index.html
 On 27 January 2011 21:30, John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
 Rather than deleting it, I moved /volunteers.html to my home directory, just 
 in case somebody really still wants it.  Not sure how long it takes for the 
 change to be visible.

 John


 On 1/26/11 9:11 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com 
 wrote:

 There should be no problem to delete it. We have to take care only of
 two pages according to google [1]
 I have already updated the announcement one. I also upgraded the site
 plugin, from now it won't ignore paragraph format (take a look at the
 differences between [2] and [3]).
 Does anyone know if mvn site:deploy goal works? are there any side
 effects (like file system permissions)?
 or I have to deploy by hand?

 [1] 
 http://www.google.it/search?as_lq=http%3A%2F%2Fstruts.apache.org%2Fvolunteers.htmlhl=itbtnG=Cerca
 [2] http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html#craigmcc
 [3] http://struts.apache.org/dev/volunteers.html#craigmcc
 On 27 January 2011 04:33, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
 maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 What do you think if we simply replace the old page with a symlink which
 points to the update version?

 I see no reason to do that. It's an old, obsolete page, in the wrong
 location. The location also predates the ASF requirement that dev
 pages live only within the dev section of the site.

 Let's just maintain the site we actually want instead of preserving
 cruft just because it's there.

 --
 Martin Cooper


 Maurizio Cucchiara

 On Jan 26, 2011 8:08 PM, John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
 Google lists only 4 pages that link to the old /volunteers.html:


 http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.htmlhl=en

 If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and delete it.

 I tried building the site from source, but it gave me errors, so I'll leave
 that alone :)

 Thanks,
 John



 On 1/25/11 9:03 PM, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:

 Hmm. The first one is very old (l...


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org





 --
 Maurizio Cucchiara

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org






 --
 

Re: Volunteers page

2011-01-27 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2011/1/28 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com:
 Anyway I published the new version of the struts website on my publilc
 html folder [6] please take a look and let me know if there is
 something wrong.

Minor update to the downloads page


Regards
-- 
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Kapituła Javarsovia http://javarsovia.pl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: Volunteers page

2011-01-26 Thread John Lindal
Google lists only 4 pages that link to the old /volunteers.html:

  
http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.htmlhl=en

If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and delete it.

I tried building the site from source, but it gave me errors, so I'll leave 
that alone :)

Thanks,
John


On 1/25/11 9:03 PM, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:

Hmm. The first one is very old (last published 15 Nov 2009), and at
least after a quick look, appears to have no counterpart in Subversion
any more, so it is quite probably an orphan page left over on the web
server from a site re-org some time ago. How did you reach it?

Unless we have incoming links to it from pages that are part of the
site in Subversion, I'd say we should simply delete that page on the
web server.

With regard to updating volunteers.xml, as chair I generally add and
remove people as they come and go. I've been remiss in doing so
recently, though (as Maurizio and you have both noticed - sorry). The
corresponding .html files are generated by the Maven site build. I'm
not sure what our current status is for that site getting deployed by
Maven, but it can be done by uploading and exploding the output from
the build, if that's not working.

--
Martin Cooper


On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:58 AM, John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
 Currently, there are two different versions:

  http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html
  http://struts.apache.org/dev/volunteers.html

 The first one is clearly out of date, because the second one matches what is 
 in subversion.

 Should I add a redirect in .htaccess to point /volunteers.html to 
 /dev/volunteers.html?

 Also, is there a process for updating /dev/volunteers.html?  Or do I just do 
 it manually, from the results of mvn site?

 Thanks,
 John


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org




Re: Volunteers page

2011-01-26 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
What do you think if we simply replace the old page with a symlink which
points to the update version?

Maurizio Cucchiara

On Jan 26, 2011 8:08 PM, John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Google lists only 4 pages that link to the old /volunteers.html:


http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.htmlhl=en

If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and delete it.

I tried building the site from source, but it gave me errors, so I'll leave
that alone :)

Thanks,
John



On 1/25/11 9:03 PM, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:

Hmm. The first one is very old (l...


Re: Volunteers page

2011-01-26 Thread Wes Wannemacher
+1

-Wes

On 1/26/11, Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 What do you think if we simply replace the old page with a symlink which
 points to the update version?

 Maurizio Cucchiara

 On Jan 26, 2011 8:08 PM, John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
 Google lists only 4 pages that link to the old /volunteers.html:


 http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.htmlhl=en

 If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and delete it.

 I tried building the site from source, but it gave me errors, so I'll leave
 that alone :)

 Thanks,
 John



 On 1/25/11 9:03 PM, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:

 Hmm. The first one is very old (l...



-- 
Wes Wannemacher

Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc.
Need Training? Struts, Spring, Maven, Tomcat...
Ask me for a quote!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: Volunteers page

2011-01-26 Thread Martin Cooper
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 What do you think if we simply replace the old page with a symlink which
 points to the update version?

I see no reason to do that. It's an old, obsolete page, in the wrong
location. The location also predates the ASF requirement that dev
pages live only within the dev section of the site.

Let's just maintain the site we actually want instead of preserving
cruft just because it's there.

--
Martin Cooper


 Maurizio Cucchiara

 On Jan 26, 2011 8:08 PM, John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
 Google lists only 4 pages that link to the old /volunteers.html:


 http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.htmlhl=en

 If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and delete it.

 I tried building the site from source, but it gave me errors, so I'll leave
 that alone :)

 Thanks,
 John



 On 1/25/11 9:03 PM, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:

 Hmm. The first one is very old (l...


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: Volunteers page

2011-01-26 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
There should be no problem to delete it. We have to take care only of
two pages according to google [1]
I have already updated the announcement one. I also upgraded the site
plugin, from now it won't ignore paragraph format (take a look at the
differences between [2] and [3]).
Does anyone know if mvn site:deploy goal works? are there any side
effects (like file system permissions)?
or I have to deploy by hand?

[1] 
http://www.google.it/search?as_lq=http%3A%2F%2Fstruts.apache.org%2Fvolunteers.htmlhl=itbtnG=Cerca
[2] http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html#craigmcc
[3] http://struts.apache.org/dev/volunteers.html#craigmcc
On 27 January 2011 04:33, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
 maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 What do you think if we simply replace the old page with a symlink which
 points to the update version?

 I see no reason to do that. It's an old, obsolete page, in the wrong
 location. The location also predates the ASF requirement that dev
 pages live only within the dev section of the site.

 Let's just maintain the site we actually want instead of preserving
 cruft just because it's there.

 --
 Martin Cooper


 Maurizio Cucchiara

 On Jan 26, 2011 8:08 PM, John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
 Google lists only 4 pages that link to the old /volunteers.html:


 http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.htmlhl=en

 If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and delete it.

 I tried building the site from source, but it gave me errors, so I'll leave
 that alone :)

 Thanks,
 John



 On 1/25/11 9:03 PM, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:

 Hmm. The first one is very old (l...


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org





-- 
Maurizio Cucchiara

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Re: Volunteers page

2011-01-26 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2011/1/27 Maurizio Cucchiara maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com:
 Does anyone know if mvn site:deploy goal works? are there any side
 effects (like file system permissions)?
 or I have to deploy by hand?

Please read the docs
http://struts.apache.org/2.2.1/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-22x-distribution.html#CreatingandSigningaStruts2.2.xDistribution-Onetime

and then
http://struts.apache.org/2.2.1/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-22x-distribution.html#CreatingandSigningaStruts2.2.xDistribution-Updatesite%2528Strutstoplevelsite%2529


Regards
-- 
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Kapituła Javarsovia http://javarsovia.pl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Volunteers page

2011-01-25 Thread John Lindal
Currently, there are two different versions:

  http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html
  http://struts.apache.org/dev/volunteers.html

The first one is clearly out of date, because the second one matches what is in 
subversion.

Should I add a redirect in .htaccess to point /volunteers.html to 
/dev/volunteers.html?

Also, is there a process for updating /dev/volunteers.html?  Or do I just do it 
manually, from the results of mvn site?

Thanks,
John


Re: Volunteers page

2011-01-25 Thread Martin Cooper
Hmm. The first one is very old (last published 15 Nov 2009), and at
least after a quick look, appears to have no counterpart in Subversion
any more, so it is quite probably an orphan page left over on the web
server from a site re-org some time ago. How did you reach it?

Unless we have incoming links to it from pages that are part of the
site in Subversion, I'd say we should simply delete that page on the
web server.

With regard to updating volunteers.xml, as chair I generally add and
remove people as they come and go. I've been remiss in doing so
recently, though (as Maurizio and you have both noticed - sorry). The
corresponding .html files are generated by the Maven site build. I'm
not sure what our current status is for that site getting deployed by
Maven, but it can be done by uploading and exploding the output from
the build, if that's not working.

--
Martin Cooper


On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:58 AM, John Lindal lind...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
 Currently, there are two different versions:

  http://struts.apache.org/volunteers.html
  http://struts.apache.org/dev/volunteers.html

 The first one is clearly out of date, because the second one matches what is 
 in subversion.

 Should I add a redirect in .htaccess to point /volunteers.html to 
 /dev/volunteers.html?

 Also, is there a process for updating /dev/volunteers.html?  Or do I just do 
 it manually, from the results of mvn site?

 Thanks,
 John


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org



Volunteers page

2005-12-28 Thread Wendy Smoak
While editing the volunteers page, I noticed that both Steve Raeburn
and James Turner appear twice.  Was the intent of r280836 to move them
to the emeritus section?

--
Wendy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Volunteers page

2005-12-28 Thread Martin Cooper
On 12/28/05, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 While editing the volunteers page, I noticed that both Steve Raeburn
 and James Turner appear twice.  Was the intent of r280836 to move them
 to the emeritus section?


Good catch. Yes, that was indeed the intent.

--
Martin Cooper


--
 Wendy

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]