Re: [DISCUSS] LiveSync
On 18/08/22 09:34, Andrea Patricelli wrote: Hi all, I've read the wiki and have only a question ATM: why do we need new mapping, couldn't we rely on the existing mapping and enable/disable livesync by resource and/or provision and/or mapped attributes? I am not sure things will end up being implemented as you suggest (e.g. extends External Resource definition with optional LiveSync capabilities) rather than keeping LiveSync distinct from External Resources. The former will probably be simpler to code; from the other side, the latter could be cleaner as an ordinary, pull-based External Resource might or might not be needed when using LiveSync. As always, code will help addressing the right solution. Regards. On 17/08/22 09:22, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, I have put some considerations about LiveSync in [1]: feel free to comment and / or amend / complete. Anyone stepping in for implementation? Regards. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/%5BDISCUSS%5D+LiveSync -- Francesco Chicchiriccò Tirasa - Open Source Excellence http://www.tirasa.net/ Member at The Apache Software Foundation Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: [DISCUSS] LiveSync
On 18/08/22 10:14, Valerio Crescia wrote: Hi all, I am really interested in implementing this new feature in syncope and would like to write my thesis on this work. This sounds great, Valerio! Happy to help and mentor if needed. Regards. On 2022/08/17 07:22:38 Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > Hi all, > I have put some considerations about LiveSync in [1]: feel free to comment and / or amend / complete. > > Anyone stepping in for implementation? > > Regards. > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/%5BDISCUSS%5D+LiveSync -- Francesco Chicchiriccò Tirasa - Open Source Excellence http://www.tirasa.net/ Member at The Apache Software Foundation Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
RE: [DISCUSS] LiveSync
Hi all, I am really interested in implementing this new feature in syncope and would like to write my thesis on this work. Best regards, Valerio Crescia On 2022/08/17 07:22:38 Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > Hi all, > I have put some considerations about LiveSync in [1]: feel free to comment and / or amend / complete. > > Anyone stepping in for implementation? > > Regards. > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/%5BDISCUSS%5D+LiveSync > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > Member at The Apache Software Foundation > Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail > http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > >
Re: [DISCUSS] LiveSync
Hi all, I've read the wiki and have only a question ATM: why do we need new mapping, couldn't we rely on the existing mapping and enable/disable livesync by resource and/or provision and/or mapped attributes? Best regards, Andrea On 17/08/22 09:22, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, I have put some considerations about LiveSync in [1]: feel free to comment and / or amend / complete. Anyone stepping in for implementation? Regards. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/%5BDISCUSS%5D+LiveSync -- Andrea Patricelli Tirasa - Open Source Excellence http://www.tirasa.net/ Member at The Apache Software Foundation Syncope
