At modules in sourceforge
Hi Matthew, Downloaded sourceforge version. It has two at modules. Does at2 contain your fixes enabling two simultaneous MO messages ? Is there a newer version somewhere? Aarno
Re: Heads up: SSL client code to verify SSL server certificates
I'm going to commit a patch that adds certificate verification to the Kannel SSL client code. Previously all SSL client connections were doen with verification disabled. This way an encrypted connection was established but the identity of the server was not proven. Please review this code and give me some feedback. I would suggest to post the patch to the devel@ list, so those who are interested and feel responsible have a change to view at the code before commiting to cvs. The one who send the patch (if having cvs write permissions) should at least wait for some time to get the heads up counted. I would suggest the voting structure: -1 : no way, not acceptable 0 : don't know, I'm not the showstopper +1 : yep, that looks ok, go commit Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
RE: Heads up: SSL client code to verify SSL server certificates
Sorry if I stepped on some toes. I did not consider the changes to be THAT intrusive. They do not change the structure of the code, they just add a new feature. I took care not to change the behaviour of the system when the new configuration option is not set. I'm willing to back the changes out if you oppose them. Do you? Regards Jörg
Re: Heads up: SSL client code to verify SSL server certificates
Sorry if I stepped on some toes. I did not consider the changes to be THAT intrusive. They do not change the structure of the code, they just add a new feature. I took care not to change the behaviour of the system when the new configuration option is not set. I'm willing to back the changes out if you oppose them. Do you? Nono, Jörg, your fine with me. I just wanted to note that it should be done on the voting scheme in general. It hasn't to be on every single change, especially when routined contributers like you know what they are doing and know that they don't create any inconsistency or trouble to others :)) Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: Heads up: SSL client code to verify SSL server certificates
Sorry if I stepped on some toes. I did not consider the changes to be THAT intrusive. They do not change the structure of the code, they just add a new feature. I took care not to change the behaviour of the system when the new configuration option is not set. I'm willing to back the changes out if you oppose them. Do you? I agree on stipe's voting idea but only for drastic changes. bugfixes and small modifications should be rolled out. After all, this is a development CVS. yep, of course, same opinion -- it seems I didn't make it as clear as you Andreas. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: Heads up: SSL client code to verify SSL server certificates
BTW, the patch looks good! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: Typo in at2
there's a typo in the modem definitions for at2, diff (smsc_at2.c) follows:
diff -U1 -r1.14 smsc_at2.c
--- smsc_at2.c 2001/11/14 17:17:45 1.14
+++ smsc_at2.c 2001/12/06 13:51:28
@@ -74,3 +74,3 @@
{ falcom,AT+IFC=2,2, 9600 ,
AT+CNMI=1,2,0,0,0, Falcom, NULL, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0 },
-{ ericcson, AT+IFC=2,2, 9600 , AT+CNMI=3,2,0,0,
R520m,NULL, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1 }
+{ ericsson, AT+IFC=2,2, 9600 , AT+CNMI=3,2,0,0,
R520m,NULL, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1 }
};
typo has been fixed in cvs, thanks a lot!
BTW, we would appritiate to attach diffs to the mail, so the long
lines don't get wrapped. Thanks.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
---
wapme.net - wherever you are
Ericsson phones supporting WAP bookmarks
Hi List Stipe, Started building support for client provisioning. Do you know what Ericsson phones support WAP bookmarks ? Aarno
Re: Ericsson phones supporting WAP bookmarks
Paul Keogh wrote: Started building support for client provisioning. Do you know what Ericsson phones support WAP bookmarks ? R320, R380 and R520 as far as I recall. Do you mean WAP 2.0 client provisioning or Ericsson proprietary ? Mainly WAP 2.0, but Ericsson proprietary would bo of some interest, too.
RE: Ericsson phones supporting WAP bookmarks
Started building support for client provisioning. Do you know what Ericsson phones support WAP bookmarks ? R320, R380 and R520 as far as I recall. Do you mean WAP 2.0 client provisioning or Ericsson proprietary ? Mainly WAP 2.0, but Ericsson proprietary would bo of some interest, too. All the listed ones above are not WAP 2.0 compliant and use the proprietary format. In fact, the Ericsson format is exactly the same as the Nokia one, I think it may have been a joint effort. You won't be able to easily reuse much of this work for 2.0 - it implies an architecture, a bootstrap model and the content is very different too. Anybody know of any handsets (current or planned) claiming WAP 2.0 client provisioning support ?
Re: Ericsson phones supporting WAP bookmarks
Started building support for client provisioning. Do you know what Ericsson phones support WAP bookmarks ? R320, R380 and R520 as far as I recall. Do you mean WAP 2.0 client provisioning or Ericsson proprietary ? Mainly WAP 2.0, but Ericsson proprietary would bo of some interest, too. the Nokia and Ericsson proprietary has been included at least for WAP OTA (whole) configuration settings. It would be easy to add a function that sends only bookmarks. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Kannel and http://wap.yahoo.de
Hi List, Kannel has trouble to reach the URL mentioned in the Subject. The first culprit is, that in wap-appl.c the follow parameter to http_start_request is zero. This way Kannel does not follow redirects. Is there any reason not to change this to 1? Even with this change in place it still fails, but at least it fails in the same way the Nokia toolkit does when trying to reach the site through HTTP. Regards Jörg
help
Dear friends, This is Loganathan. i am working on sms . i need some help from you. now i am sending sms to one mobile. at that time the sms server has some problem(means shutdown,.. etc). my message where it will be store, is that message reach to that mobile no.. if anybaby knows pls mail me . kind regards Loganathan.B
REF- USSD
Hi all, I am looking at the use of USSD as a bearer for wap - faster than SMS. Cant quite work out though if there is a delivery confirmation. So I have two questions I think 1. If roaming / or at any time - can I always retrieve a delivery confirmation of a SMS from an SMSC (even if the phone is abroad) 2. If I use USSD abroad the user experience will alway be the same as if the user was on home netwrok but is there a delivery confirmation I can retrieve for USSD. As I am sure you'll appreciate this has a significant effect on any sort of billing models I may try Many thanks for your help Steve
at2: +CSMS detection broken, fix attached, new init string forericsson
Hi,
while trying to setup at2, I had to fix 2 more bugs. The first one is that
at2_init_device uses octstr_case_compare as comparison function in
list_search, which behaves like strcmp in that it return 0 if the strings
match, which is exactly the opposite of what list_search expects. So it
just returns the first thing it finds that doesn't match.
I also had to change the init string for ericssons, since the default
+CNMI=3,2,0,0 didn't work neither for R320m nor for R520m.
It looks like they both don't support setting mt to 2.
Diff attached.
Index:
smsc_at2.c===RCS file:
/home/cvs/gateway/gw/smsc_at2.c,vretrieving revision 1.15diff -B -u -r1.15
smsc_at2.c--- smsc_at2.c 2001/12/07 10:51:54 1.15+++ smsc_at2.c
2001/12/07 12:23:56@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ { siemens, AT\\Q3, 19200 ,
AT+CNMI=1,2,0,0,0, SIEMENS, M20, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1 }, { nokiaphone,
AT+IFC=2,2, 9600 , AT+CNMI=1,2,0,0,0, NokiaPhone , NULL, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1
}, { falcom, AT+IFC=2,2, 9600 , AT+CNMI=1,2,0,0,0,
Falcom, NULL, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0 },-{ ericsson,AT+IFC=2,2, 9600
, AT+CNMI=3,2,0,0,R520m,NULL, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1 }+{ ericsson,
AT+IFC=2,2, 9600 , AT+CNMI=3,3,0,0,R520m,NULL, 0, 0, 1, 1,
1 } }; /* maximum data to attempt to read in one go */@@ -489,6 +489,13 @@ } +/*
like octstr_case_compare, but return 1 when the strings match, 0 otherwise+ * Used
later in list_search */+int at2_octstr_case_compare(Octstr *os1, Octstr *os2)+{+
return !(octstr_case_compare(os1, os2));+}+
/** **
at2_init_device ** initializes the device after being opened@@ -591,7 +597,7 @@ }
vals = octstr_split(ts, octstr_imm(,)); octstr_destroy(ts);-ts =
list_search(vals, octstr_imm(1),(void *) octstr_case_compare);+ ts =
list_search(vals, octstr_imm(1),(void *) at2_octstr_case_compare); if(ts)
privdata-phase2plus = 1; list_destroy(vals,(void *) at2_octstr_destroy);
Re: charset_init()
Paul Keogh wrote:
This function leaks memory.
I think it needs to be matched with something like;
void charset_shutdown ()
{
xmlCleanupEncodingAliases ();
}
Because
* This is the way all other _init/_shutdown pairs work
* You never know who might call charset_init() from and when.
H, true. I added the function and a call to it in the gwlib_shutdown.
PS. What has happened to the checks, they all seem to fail now?
--
Tuomas Luttinen
Application Developer -- Reach U
**
RE: Heads up: SSL client code to verify SSL server certificates
I just commited a fix for this problem. The code was incorrect in multiple ways: 1. The SSL error queue for the thread might not have been empty, so incorrect error codes might have been handled. FIX: call ERR_clear_error() before calling SSL_connect 2. SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ and SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE was not handled at all. FIX: I overcame this problem by making the socket blocking while calling SSL_connect. This should not be a problem since this function calls conn_open_tcp which might block, too. 3. In case of an error conn_destroy might have been called with a half initialized Connection. This might cause a crash when the ssl_mutex was still NULL. FIX: make sure the mutex is created before any error handling. I suspect 1.) might be true for other SSL I/O calls as well. This should be audited. Regards Jörg -Original Message- From: Jörg Pommnitz To: 'Stipe Tolj ' Cc: ''[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ' Sent: 12/7/01 12:07 PM Subject: RE: Heads up: SSL client code to verify SSL server certificates Thanks, however I just discovered some misbehaviour that I'm unsure whom to blame for: If a certificate gets rejected than this currently not detected in Connection *conn_open_ssl(Octstr *host, int port, Octstr *certkeyfile, Octstr *our_host) and I don't understand why. HTTP requests over a SSL connection later fail when they try to write something. I suspect this never came up until now because the SSL negotiations always succeeded. Any ideas? Regards Jörg
RE: charset_init()
-Original Message- From: Tuomas Luttinen To: Kannel Development List (E-mail) Sent: 12/7/01 2:57 PM Subject: Re: charset_init() PS. What has happened to the checks, they all seem to fail now? They report a failure because they do not expect the SSL debug output. Maybe this should be removed. Regards Jörg
Re: charset_init()
Hi, Tuomas Luttinen wrote: PS. What has happened to the checks, they all seem to fail now? Make check presumes logging only when error. Are there pure debug statements in check.log ? Aarno
SMPP ton and npi in PDU
Folks, Just wondering is there any way of easily setting the ton and npi values in the SMPP bind_transmiter, bind_receiver, submit_sm and deliver_sm without having to go editing the code? I don't think I have the latest CVS version of kannel but its only a week or two behind the CVS version. Regards, Ronan.
