[Bug 1199969] perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip-0.04-17.fc23 FTBFS: Failed test 'Parse Date 'March 23, 2003''
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199969 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Format-DateMa ||nip-0.04-18.fc23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=H4qXo1GGWUa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip/f22] (3 commits) ...Modernize spec file
Summary of changes: f87b19e... Document patch (*) efa6cb2... Pass test with Date-Manip-6.49 (*) 32a1c21... Modernize spec file (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-PDL
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.7.0-8.fc22.x86_64 requires libproj.so.0()(64bit) On i386: perl-PDL-2.7.0-8.fc22.i686 requires libproj.so.0 On armhfp: perl-PDL-2.7.0-8.fc22.armv7hl requires libproj.so.0 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: [EPEL-devel] Process for supporting of new architectures
On 10 March 2015 at 11:55, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: We can figure this out off list tho. Some of the new P8 hardware that was recently racked is intended to be for EPEL on ppc64/ppc64le, I just need to get it configured and build VMs done etc Ah didn't know that. Would have racked that in the build network rack versus the secondary arch rack then. So the system is on a switch which is dedicated to the SecondaryArch/QA vlan. We will need to get it moved over to the build network or make sure that the all the firewall rules are in place so it can talk through the router firewall to the Build servers. [I don't know which one will be less work to you guys.] From an infrastructure PoV the advantage that Power8 hardware has is that it's much closer to x86 in a number of ways and it'll enable us to mimic the deployment of things like virt builders in a single contiguous manner across all architectures to enable more simplified standardised manner to ease burden and increase automation from an infra PoV Thats good. ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
testdays is down again
Can someone kick testdays.qa.fp.o again? Every time I finally get around to transferring the anaconda Test Day results into the page, it's down :( -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report
I know this has been discussed around the traps here and there but I thought I'd take it to the list for a more directed discussion. Thank you. I would appreciate a directed discussion on this. We brought this up at the last EPEL meeting (which I haven't posted the minutes too :/.) and were going to bring it up for a vote. It's been a long time since there's been a new architecture added to RHEL. With RHEL 7.1 there's been support added for POWER Little Endian (ppc64le) and with the aaarch64 PEAP (I have no idea about RHs plans there) plus the i686 CentOS effort it's possible that there might be demand in the future for more architectural additions so I figured it's probably a good time to discuss requirements for the addition of new architectures to EPEL. In the case of ppc64le the RHEL release is closer to x86_64 in features and functionality than ppc64. It also has the advantage it's also little endian so a number of the issues that are seen with the big endian builds are a non event. IBM have been doing some builds and filing bugs [1] for build issues. Just to note the initial 7.1 ppc64le release of RHEL has a different distag to el7 but this should be resolved by 7.2 beta. Here are the issues that I would like to see addressed for any architecture. Various people have said that I am 'PM' of EPEL for the time being, so I would like to think about this as I would hope a good product manager would. [This is also where I get to be removed forcibly] 1) Who is championing an architecture? Primarily IBM, but this will widen with the OpenPOWER foundation and it's members widening and HW from that initiative starting to become available. In the case of aarch64, if that happens, there will be similarities through Linaro Enterprise Group (LEG). Yes, I agree. 2) Where do developers get access to hardware that they can debug issues if they want to. I'll let Mike (from IBM) answer this one in detail but there's a number of Universities hosting publicly accessible instances of HW with a process in place, Linaro has similar process with access to aarch64 HW running Fedora releases. There is currently systems at OSU and we are looking to expand that. There is also work going on in Brno Cz. to add another University maintained env. I can send out more info if it is needed about how to request access to these environments. 3) How do we remove an architecture for whatever reasons? [Possible ones could be it turns out that CentOS i686 is dropped after one subrelease... or PPC64be is dropped by IBM because everyone moved to PPC64le. Or Itanium3 comes out and no one wants x86_64.] I don't see that would be any different to how we dropped PPC from mainline Fedora back in the F-12/13 timeframe but the architectures, once added to core RHEL, will be supported for the lifecycle of RHEL so I don't see that this process would be any different to how we dropped i686 or any of the 32 bit architectures in the transition from el6 - el7. I personally don't think it's actually worth expending too much time on this process until the issue arises, cross the bridge when we get there so to speak. 4) Is there a way to break out an EPEL-secondary architecture where these sorts of things are done? [I believe the answer is NO, but it is a question I expect would be asked.] Not that I'm aware of and it would be a lot of extra work for rel-eng to do so for minimal, if any, benefit. My main concern on architectures are the following: 1) Every architecture we have is one that potentially blocks other builds. If the PPC builder which is only used for EPEL goes down.. regular Fedora builds have been affected in the past. I believe those problems have been fixed in koji but it is a non-zero risk. 2) Even if it has been fixed to never effect Fedora builds.. it is more hardware which needs to be maintained in the primary build network and downage of any architecture affects all EPEL builds. I don't see those issues any different to any of the other architectures or hardware that's needed to run Fedora infrastructure whether it be servers, storage or network. We have Enterprise support on the HW with all due process. 3) The people who are championing this are the guys who have to do a lot of the hard work of getting it going.. but are the most overworked guys in Fedora with just Fedora primary and secondary architecture work. They are not the people who have time to be answering developer questions about why some java app doesn't compile on ppcle which requires an IBM developer to go 'h yeah you need to patch that twiddly bit.' I realize that there are various ARM and PPC developers who do that for Fedora in their mailing lists. I would like to see someone from there saying 'yeah we will help when we can' for any architecture. Yes, we will help when those issues arise. We have already started looking at this. We have been helping with LE issues with both enterprise
File GDGraph-1.49.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-GDGraph: 8bb270a30fea27491302b39b701b3d4e GDGraph-1.49.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1199969] perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip-0.04-17.fc23 FTBFS: Failed test 'Parse Date 'March 23, 2003''
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199969 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- All Fedoras are affected ad the perl-Date-Manip was rebased everywhere. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hoXuioLHp0a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip] Document patch
commit f87b19eb1e2323c5d35c2a2f247a77691fb6a653
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Mar 10 13:18:19 2015 +0100
Document patch
perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip.spec | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
---
diff --git a/perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip.spec
b/perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip.spec
index 44d60f0..35f740c 100644
--- a/perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip.spec
+++ b/perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip.spec
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-DateManip/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/B/BB/BBENNETT/dt-fmt-datemanip/DateTime-Format-DateManip-%{version}.tar.gz
+# Use full time zone name instead of an ambiguous abbreviation, CPAN RT#55771
Patch0: DateTime-Format-DateManip-01conversion.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Harden_all_packages_with_position-independent_code + guile modules
In rawhide building the gnutls guile bindings fails, and that's related to the new hardening flags being enabled with [0]. The failure is quite peculiar since the loading of a dynamic module fails [1] which already is position independent. Could someone explain what do the new flags in rawhide do (and possibly add this description in [0]). Using the same hardened flags in F21 has no negative effect in building the module. regards, Nikos [0]. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_all_packages_with_position-independent_code [1]. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196556 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1201074] perl-IO-Capture-Extended-0.13 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201074 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-IO-Capture-Extended-0.13-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IO-Capture-Extended-0.13-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=19Ce22Zv8Ta=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-GDGraph] Created tag perl-GDGraph-1.49-1.fc22
The lightweight tag 'perl-GDGraph-1.49-1.fc22' was created pointing to: 4bc6be3... Update to 1.49 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: openQA live image testing: ready for merge?
Adam, please set these up for review in Phabricator. I strongly suspect (given the time that I spent looking at the changes so far) that some discussion will be required, and Phab is _the_ place to do it. Also, please make sure to rebase your repos to their current state, before creating the phab reviews. For further development, I'd suggest creating an account on Bitbucket, and using the core repos - all the FedoraQA Devs can write to the repos, and all the admins and administer it. Once you have the accound, I'll add you to the Dev group, and having a feature branch in the core repo seems quite better, given the development work-flows we currently adhere to. Thanks, joza ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
[perl-GDGraph] Update to 1.49
commit 4bc6be3c76f2f72477e08466d7cda44e9281ae9c
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Mar 12 08:45:43 2015 +
Update to 1.49
- New upstream release 1.49
- Fix to Z-axis color filling in 3D pie charts (Debian Bug #489184)
- Bump ExtUtils::MakeMaker dependency
- Tiny improvement in the code of the samples
- Include Dustismo_Sans.ttf with documentation as it's used by the samples
.gitignore| 2 ++
perl-GDGraph.spec | 24
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 8c7e332..8cd1f78 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
+/GDGraph-1.44.tar.gz
/GDGraph-1.48.tar.gz
+/GDGraph-1.49.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-GDGraph.spec b/perl-GDGraph.spec
index 9459023..29d9953 100644
--- a/perl-GDGraph.spec
+++ b/perl-GDGraph.spec
@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
Name: perl-GDGraph
-Version:1.48
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:1.49
+Release:1%{?dist}
Epoch: 1
Summary:Graph generation package for Perl
Group: Development/Libraries
-License:GPL+ or Artistic
+License:(GPL+ or Artistic) and GPLv2+
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/GDGraph/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/R/RU/RUZ/GDGraph-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.58
# Run-time
BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(constant)
@@ -52,8 +52,7 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
-
-%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%check
@@ -61,12 +60,21 @@ make test
%files
-%doc CHANGES README samples/
+# Dustismo_Sans.ttf is GPLv2+, everything else is GPL+ or Artistic
+%license Dustismo.LICENSE
+%doc CHANGES README Dustismo_Sans.ttf samples/
%{perl_vendorlib}/GD/
-%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
+%{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
%changelog
+* Thu Mar 12 2015 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1:1.49-1
+- Update to 1.49
+ - Fix to Z-axis color filling in 3D pie charts (Debian Bug #489184)
+ - Bump ExtUtils::MakeMaker dependency
+ - Tiny improvement in the code of the samples
+- Include Dustismo_Sans.ttf with documentation as it's used by the samples
+
* Wed Aug 27 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1:1.48-3
- Perl 5.20 rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 85f7867..77ace02 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-2c9e4feb4246200d96b9faa8024b0bf0 GDGraph-1.48.tar.gz
+8bb270a30fea27491302b39b701b3d4e GDGraph-1.49.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1199543] perl-DBI ships with a module released under Artistic (only) license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199543 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rh-perl520-perl-DBI-1.633-5 |rh-perl520-perl-DBI-1.633-6 |.el6|.el6 |rh-perl520-perl-DBI-1.633-5 |rh-perl520-perl-DBI-1.633-6 |.el7|.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=86evA6hbRxa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1201087] perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.027 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201087 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- ppisar's perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.027-1.fc23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=619669 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NK2aJA6CVja=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-GDGraph/f22] Update to 1.49
Summary of changes: 4bc6be3... Update to 1.49 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-GDGraph] Created tag perl-GDGraph-1.49-1.fc23
The lightweight tag 'perl-GDGraph-1.49-1.fc23' was created pointing to: 4bc6be3... Update to 1.49 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-DBI/f22] Remove script strip_FAQ.sh from sources; Rename script
commit f4a7fe82942675641fb27fc6acf8b7a757ee668d
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 12 10:18:29 2015 +0100
Remove script strip_FAQ.sh from sources; Rename script
perl-DBI.spec| 8 +---
strip_FAQ.sh = repackage.sh | 23 +++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBI.spec b/perl-DBI.spec
index 7a448cb..4d30dac 100644
--- a/perl-DBI.spec
+++ b/perl-DBI.spec
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Name: perl-DBI
Version:1.633
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:A database access API for perl
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -18,10 +18,9 @@ URL:http://dbi.perl.org/
# The source tarball must be repackaged to remove the DBI/FAQ.pm, since the
# license is not a FSF free license.
# When upgrading, download the new source tarball, and run
-# ./strip-FAQ.sh version to produce the -repackaged tarball.
+# ./repackage.sh version to produce the -repackaged tarball.
# Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/T/TI/TIMB/DBI-%{version}.tar.gz
Source0:DBI-%{version}_repackaged.tar.gz
-Source1:strip_FAQ.sh
BuildRequires: perl
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Find)
@@ -171,6 +170,9 @@ make test
%endif
%changelog
+* Thu Mar 12 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.633-3
+- Remove script strip_FAQ.sh from sources
+
* Mon Mar 09 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.633-2
- Repackage source tarball to remove non-free DBI/FAQ.pm (bug #1199532)
diff --git a/strip_FAQ.sh b/repackage.sh
similarity index 52%
rename from strip_FAQ.sh
rename to repackage.sh
index 8d8f138..226b09c 100755
--- a/strip_FAQ.sh
+++ b/repackage.sh
@@ -1,4 +1,25 @@
#!/bin/bash
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2010 Red Hat, Inc.
+# Authors:
+# Thomas Woerner twoer...@redhat.com
+#
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/.
+#
+# Script was a bit changed for DBI, because command below breaks tar index
+# tar -f tarball --delete file
+# Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
version=$1
[ -z $version ] { echo Usage: $0 version; exit 1; }
@@ -7,6 +28,8 @@ version=$1
declare -a REMOVE
REMOVE[${#REMOVE[*]}]=lib/DBI/FAQ.pm
+# no changes below this line should be needed
+
orig=DBI-${version}
orig_tgz=${orig}.tar.gz
repackaged=${orig}_repackaged
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1199538] perl-DBI ships with a module released under Artistic (only) license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199538 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||rfont...@redhat.com Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2015-03-12 05:28:31 --- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- According to Richard, it's okay to ship this file with EL. Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sCHEQxz83Ba=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: [389-devel] [389-users] GUI console and Kerberos
On 03/11/2015 11:54 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: Hey every one I have a question I know at least once in the past i setup the admin console so it could utilize Kerberos passwords based on a howto I found once which after I changed jobs I could never find again. today I was looking for something else and I saw a mention on the site about httpd needing to be compiled with http auth support. well I did a little digging and I found this file /etc/dirsrv/admin-serv/admserv.conf in that file I found a lot of entries that look like this LocationMatch /*/[tT]asks/[Cc]onfiguration/* AuthUserFile /etc/dirsrv/admin-serv/admpw AuthType basic AuthName Admin Server Require valid-user AdminSDK on ADMCgiBinDir /usr/lib64/dirsrv/cgi-bin NESCompatEnv on Options +ExecCGI Order allow,deny Allow from all /LocationMatch when I checked /etc/dirsrv/admin-serv/admpw sure enough I found the Password hash for the admin user. So my question is before I wast time experimenting could it possibly be as simple as changing the auth type to kerberos http://modauthkerb.sourceforge.net/configure.html I don't know. I don't think anyone has ever tried it. keep in mind my Kerberos Servers do not use LDAP as the backend. -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
[Bug 1199540] perl-DBI ships with a module released under Artistic (only) license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199540 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||rfont...@redhat.com Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2015-03-12 05:28:41 --- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- According to Richard, it's okay to ship this file with EL. Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4HXoVwL1sga=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-DBI/f21] Remove script strip_FAQ.sh from sources; Rename script
commit 8cdd77d0b1f0e4b967e1e1142bfca5b5dc6c3823
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 12 10:51:53 2015 +0100
Remove script strip_FAQ.sh from sources; Rename script
perl-DBI.spec| 9 +
strip_FAQ.sh = repackage.sh | 23 +++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBI.spec b/perl-DBI.spec
index fa5a779..dbe1dde 100644
--- a/perl-DBI.spec
+++ b/perl-DBI.spec
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Name: perl-DBI
Version:1.631
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Release:7%{?dist}
Summary:A database access API for perl
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -18,11 +18,9 @@ URL:http://dbi.perl.org/
# The source tarball must be repackaged to remove the DBI/FAQ.pm, since the
# license is not a FSF free license.
# When upgrading, download the new source tarball, and run
-# ./strip-FAQ.sh version to produce the -repackaged tarball.
+# ./repackage.sh version to produce the -repackaged tarball.
# Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/T/TI/TIMB/DBI-%{version}.tar.gz
Source0:DBI-%{version}_repackaged.tar.gz
-Source1:strip_FAQ.sh
-
# Add a security warning about use of RPC::PlClient, bug #1030578, CPAN
RT#90475
Patch0: DBI-1.630-Security-notice-for-Proxy.patch
BuildRequires: perl
@@ -166,6 +164,9 @@ make test
%endif
%changelog
+* Thu Mar 12 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.631-7
+- Remove script strip_FAQ.sh from sources
+
* Mon Mar 09 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.631-6
- Repackage source tarball to remove non-free DBI/FAQ.pm (bug #1199532)
diff --git a/strip_FAQ.sh b/repackage.sh
similarity index 52%
rename from strip_FAQ.sh
rename to repackage.sh
index 8d8f138..226b09c 100755
--- a/strip_FAQ.sh
+++ b/repackage.sh
@@ -1,4 +1,25 @@
#!/bin/bash
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2010 Red Hat, Inc.
+# Authors:
+# Thomas Woerner twoer...@redhat.com
+#
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/.
+#
+# Script was a bit changed for DBI, because command below breaks tar index
+# tar -f tarball --delete file
+# Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
version=$1
[ -z $version ] { echo Usage: $0 version; exit 1; }
@@ -7,6 +28,8 @@ version=$1
declare -a REMOVE
REMOVE[${#REMOVE[*]}]=lib/DBI/FAQ.pm
+# no changes below this line should be needed
+
orig=DBI-${version}
orig_tgz=${orig}.tar.gz
repackaged=${orig}_repackaged
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1199532] perl-DBI ships with a module released under Artistic (only) license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199532 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DBI-1.633-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBI-1.633-3.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZXnkfwlaTta=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts] 0.027 bump
commit 6e3bff60cf307c4f4d7fe5d8e66254314312e982
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 12 10:36:06 2015 +0100
0.027 bump
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec | 14 --
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 62efee0..3965b99 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -12,3 +12,4 @@
/MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.022.tar.gz
/MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.023.tar.gz
/MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.024.tar.gz
+/MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.027.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec
b/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec
index d140f9b..5defd06 100644
--- a/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec
+++ b/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts
-Version:0.024
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:0.027
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Shorthand for common Moose attribute options
License:LGPLv2
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -8,12 +8,10 @@ URL:
http://metacpan.org/release/MooseX-AttributeShortcuts/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/R/RS/RSRCHBOY/MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.30
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(strict)
BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
# Run-time:
-BuildRequires: perl(autobox::Core)
-BuildRequires: perl(autobox::Junctions)
BuildRequires: perl(List::AllUtils)
BuildRequires: perl(Moose)
BuildRequires: perl(Moose::Exporter)
@@ -70,11 +68,15 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {}
\;
make test
%files
-%doc Changes LICENSE README
+%license LICENSE
+%doc Changes README
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Thu Mar 12 2015 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.027-1
+- 0.027 bump
+
* Mon Sep 01 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.024-3
- Perl 5.20 rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 3ca2610..805679a 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-ab7cd4b622394bff88b7ae1b9f2907b6 MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.024.tar.gz
+94cd6bc3c923f7335e29e0e38968e74d MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.027.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
libdwarf build failure with hardened builds
Does anybody have any clue what's going on here: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8137/9208137/build.log It's an update to libdwarf, but the actual cause appears to be that it doesn't like the new hardened build options. It's a glibc symbol that it seems to be complaing about though: /usr/bin/ld: dwgetopt.o: relocation R_386_GOTOFF against undefined symbol `optopt@@GLIBC_2.0' can not be used when making a shared object The dwgetopt.o file appears to have been been correctly build with the hardening flags: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -I. -I. -I./../libdwarf -DCONFPREFIX=/usr/local/lib -c ./dwgetopt.c Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 118 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1 33 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0626/perl-Gtk2-1.2495-1.el7 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0977/novnc-0.5.1-2.el7 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0862/nodejs-0.10.36-3.el7,libuv-0.10.34-1.el7,v8-3.14.5.10-17.el7 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1024/cabextract-1.5-1.el7 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087/dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1135/librsync-1.0.0-1.el7,duplicity-0.6.24-5.el7,rdiff-backup-1.2.8-11.el7 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0952/qpid-qmf-0.28-27.el7,qpid-cpp-0.30-12.el7 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1077/libmspack-0.5-0.1.alpha.el7 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1092/phpMyAdmin-4.3.11.1-1.el7 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1203/389-admin-1.1.38-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing R-3.1.3-1.el7 RBTools-0.7.2-1.el7 ReviewBoard-2.0.14-1.el7 lnst-7-1.el7 opensips-1.10.3-1.el7 python-djblets-0.8.16-1.el7 retrace-server-1.12-4.el7 rtpproxy-2.0.0-1.el7 x2godesktopsharing-3.1.1.2-1.el7 Details about builds: R-3.1.3-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1206) A language for data analysis and graphics Update Information: Update R to 3.1.3. rkward updated to 0.6.3 in Fedora 21+. rpy rebuilt. ChangeLog: * Mon Mar 9 2015 Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org - 3.1.3-1 - update to 3.1.3 * Mon Jan 26 2015 David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com - 3.1.2-2 - rebuild for ICU 54.1 RBTools-0.7.2-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1207) Tools for use with ReviewBoard Update Information: https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/2.0.14/ https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/rbtools/0.7.2/ ChangeLog: * Tue Mar 10 2015 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com 0.7.2-1 - New upstream release 0.7.2 - https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/rbtools/0.7.2/ ReviewBoard-2.0.14-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1207) Web-based code review tool Update Information: https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/2.0.14/ https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/rbtools/0.7.2/ ChangeLog: * Tue Mar 10 2015 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com 2.0.14-1 - https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/2.0.14/ * Fri Feb 20 2015 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com 2.0.13-2 - Fix Djblets requirement lnst-7-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1209) Common code for lnst-ctl and lnst-slave Update Information: Updating to stable release 7 ChangeLog: * Wed Mar 11 2015 Jiri Pirko jpi...@redhat.com - 7-1 - Updating to stable release 7 opensips-1.10.3-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1219) Open Source SIP Server Update Information: - Initial build for EL7 References: [ 1 ] Bug #529831 - Review Request: opensips - Open Source SIP Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529831 python-djblets-0.8.16-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1207)
File MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.027.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts: 94cd6bc3c923f7335e29e0e38968e74d MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.027.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
lrzip license correction
lrzip package license tag was corrected from (GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and Public Domain) to (GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and MIT and Public Domain). -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
libproj soname bump
It appears the soname of libproj was changed in rawhide yesterday, so any dependencies will need to be rebuilt. I'm taking care of mapnik now. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[perl-DBI] Remove script strip_FAQ.sh from sources; Rename script
commit feef26229acc3db65ec9f5c177b0a2453d953641
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 12 10:13:06 2015 +0100
Remove script strip_FAQ.sh from sources; Rename script
perl-DBI.spec| 8 +---
strip_FAQ.sh = repackage.sh | 23 +++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBI.spec b/perl-DBI.spec
index 7a448cb..4d30dac 100644
--- a/perl-DBI.spec
+++ b/perl-DBI.spec
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Name: perl-DBI
Version:1.633
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:A database access API for perl
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -18,10 +18,9 @@ URL:http://dbi.perl.org/
# The source tarball must be repackaged to remove the DBI/FAQ.pm, since the
# license is not a FSF free license.
# When upgrading, download the new source tarball, and run
-# ./strip-FAQ.sh version to produce the -repackaged tarball.
+# ./repackage.sh version to produce the -repackaged tarball.
# Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/T/TI/TIMB/DBI-%{version}.tar.gz
Source0:DBI-%{version}_repackaged.tar.gz
-Source1:strip_FAQ.sh
BuildRequires: perl
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Find)
@@ -171,6 +170,9 @@ make test
%endif
%changelog
+* Thu Mar 12 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.633-3
+- Remove script strip_FAQ.sh from sources
+
* Mon Mar 09 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.633-2
- Repackage source tarball to remove non-free DBI/FAQ.pm (bug #1199532)
diff --git a/strip_FAQ.sh b/repackage.sh
similarity index 52%
rename from strip_FAQ.sh
rename to repackage.sh
index 8d8f138..226b09c 100755
--- a/strip_FAQ.sh
+++ b/repackage.sh
@@ -1,4 +1,25 @@
#!/bin/bash
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2010 Red Hat, Inc.
+# Authors:
+# Thomas Woerner twoer...@redhat.com
+#
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/.
+#
+# Script was a bit changed for DBI, because command below breaks tar index
+# tar -f tarball --delete file
+# Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
version=$1
[ -z $version ] { echo Usage: $0 version; exit 1; }
@@ -7,6 +28,8 @@ version=$1
declare -a REMOVE
REMOVE[${#REMOVE[*]}]=lib/DBI/FAQ.pm
+# no changes below this line should be needed
+
orig=DBI-${version}
orig_tgz=${orig}.tar.gz
repackaged=${orig}_repackaged
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1199537] perl-DBI ships with a module released under Artistic (only) license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199537 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||rfont...@redhat.com Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2015-03-12 05:28:25 --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- According to Richard, it's okay to ship this file with EL. Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GHOViZJJyza=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1201087] perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.027 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201087 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- This release changes some code to not use autobox. Thus I will push it into rawhide only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FL5kP1HSHHa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1201087] perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.027 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201087 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-MooseX-AttributeShortc ||uts-0.027-1.fc23 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-03-12 05:58:32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JFc8rTILrha=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1199532] perl-DBI ships with a module released under Artistic (only) license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199532 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-DBI-1.630-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBI-1.630-3.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VIM2Y1rXeza=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: polymake
polymake has broken dependencies in the F-22 tree: On x86_64: polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.1 On i386: polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.i686 requires perl = 4:5.20.1 On armhfp: polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.armv7hl requires perl = 4:5.20.1 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Issue with yum/systemd?
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 08:23:43PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 08:15:38PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/10/2015 03:13 AM, Dave Johansen wrote: #0 0xb76debac in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7510d03 in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #2 0xb6fa4842 in rpmScriptRun () from /lib/librpm.so.3 #3 0xb6f83c53 in runScript () from /lib/librpm.so.3 #4 0xb6f8434f in runInstScript () from /lib/librpm.so.3 #5 0xb6f8531b in rpmpsmRun () from /lib/librpm.so.3 #6 0xb6f9a3cb in rpmteProcess () from /lib/librpm.so.3 #7 0xb6fa1714 in rpmtsRun () from /lib/librpm.so.3 [...] It looks like yum is waiting on some process. It's waiting for a package scriptlet to finish. Here's the contents of the script that it's waiting on: if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then # Package removal, not upgrade systemctl --no-reload disable minetest@default.service /dev/null 21 || : systemctl stop minetest@default.service /dev/null 21 || : fi Sorry for the multiple emails. It's stuck on the call to stop the service. When I run status, I prints the following: . minetest@default.service - Minetest multiplayer server w/ default.conf server config Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/system/system/minetest@.service; disabled) Active: inactive (dead) Any recommendations on what I should do next to diagnose the source of the problem? How long does it stay in this state? systemctl times out connections after a timeout (25s ?), so even if it fails to communicate with PID1 for any reason, rpm should still continue at some point. pstree -ap pid-of-rpm should show a list of processes. If it's systemctl that is hanging, can you post the backtrace? It had been stuck for ~3 days and last night I got sick of my computer being sluggish, so I started trying to see if I could get it to break free. I should have gotten a stacktrace for systemctl first, but didn't think of that and here's what happened: I ran systemctl start minetest@default.service Then after a few seconds, the system went into what I believe was suspend mode (screen went blank and I had to hit the power button to get things to come back). I then hit Ctrl-C after about 30 seconds because it appeared that the service wasn't actually starting (it technically was in the process of being removed after all). After that, the CPU usage of systemd dropped back to being close to 0 and the status output the following: ● minetest@default.service Loaded: not-found (Reason: No such file or directory) Active: inactive (dead) Mar 10 20:16:19 JohansenDev systemd[1]: Failed to start minetest@default.service. This could be somehow related to a restart of unit after it's file has been removed. We had some bugs in that area in the past. Sorry, can't say what the problem was. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1200945] Needs to be rebuilt for EL7.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200945 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-GTop-0.18-5.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-GTop-0.18-5.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Yz3dFs9wqva=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1201267] New: perl-Encode-2.71 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201267 Bug ID: 1201267 Summary: perl-Encode-2.71 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Encode Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 2.71 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.70-2.fc23 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Encode/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rKb69noc74a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: openQA live image testing: ready for merge?
Some preliminary feedback: = openqa_fedora = == _do_install_and_reboot.pm == Please delete the anaconda_install_finish needle, if it is unused. anaconda_install_done needle: * Why is only a part of the button selected? * What is the logic behind assert_and_click for multiple areas in one needle? Seems like the click is done on the last of the areas (judging from the contents of the needle) - is this _always_ true? == main.pm == ad the contents of: _boot_to_default.pm _live_run_anaconda.pm _anaconda_select_language.pm I'm absolutely for splitting this up a bit, but I'd rather have it done in a slightly different way: * rename _boot_to_default.pm to something in the likes of _handle_bootloader.pm (/me is bad with names, but it really just handles the grub options...) * merge _live_run_anaconda.pm and _anaconda_select_language.pm into one file, and call it something like _get_to_anaconda_main_hub.pm This will keep the idea of having things split (so the unless Kickstart clause is just in one place), and will join the pieces, that IMHO should be together anyway. == Needle changes == === anaconda_spoke_done.json === Why change the needle, and why in this particular manner? The change looks unnecessary. If there is no particular reason for it, please revert to previous version. === bootloader_bios_live.json === The black area (last match area in the needle) is IMHO quite useless - I suspect it is a remain of the original bootloader needle. If there isn't a reason for having it there, please remove the area from the needle. === gdm.json === I'm not sure why you selected the particular bit of the screen, but it does not really make much sense to me. Why did you not select any of the more distinct areas of the gdm screen? Also, I'd really like for the needle files to be named as close to the tag (i.e. graphical_login ) as possible, I know that you probably made this with other login managers in mind, but please use graphical_login_gdm as the name of the file, instead of plain gdm. = openqa_fedora_tools = == conf_test_suites.py == I'm fairly certain that both default_install and package_set_minimal cover QA:Testcase_install_to_VirtIO. == openqa_trigger.py == I really don't like the whole check_condition() thing. The name of the function does no correspond to what it does, which is quite unpleasant together with its side-effects (scheduling the jobs, and changing value of the jobs variable), and using variables from out of its scope. Also, it seems that you forgot to actually fill the uni_done variable, resulting in `if condition and image.arch not in uni_done:` being effectively reduced to `if condition`, and `if not all(arch in uni_done for arch in arches):` reduced to `if True`. So please: * find a more appropriate name for check_condition() * pass all necessary variables in arguments * make sure the uni_done variable is filled with the right data, and ideally rename it to something more descriptive of it's purpose. I've spent an hour or so tackling it, so please consider this as an example: http://fpaste.org/197044/63062142/ but note that I have not ran the code (so typos are probably present). I hope I'm not being too harsh, it is most certainly not my intent to come around that way, J. ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
[Bug 1201267] perl-Encode-2.71 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201267 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Scratch build succeeded http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9209682 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pBqxa3pa2Ta=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Encode-2.71.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Encode: 127f9ed0bdc07e4736ad70ac06223440 Encode-2.71.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Why -mtune=atom?
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote: The default CFLAGS set by RPM include “-mtune-atom”. That's for i686 only Why? I doubt Atom CPUs are Fedora's primary target. It's not even a documented GCC option. There is such a wide variety of CPUs under this label that it's not even clear what it would mean. If it's better than “-mtune=generic” or the GCC default, shouldn't GCC be fixed? It was decided some time ago (F-13 from memory) and it's aimed at 32 bit platforms. At the time it was decided it was the best compromise and if people wanted performance they should be running 64 bit anyway. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[perl-Devel-CheckOS] 1.75 bump; Correct license from (GPLv2 or Artistic) to ((GPLv2 or Artistic) and CC-BY-SA)
commit 076c04f1db8797a2072104872ea423067eeac647
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 12 14:23:42 2015 +0100
1.75 bump; Correct license from (GPLv2 or Artistic) to ((GPLv2 or Artistic)
and CC-BY-SA)
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec | 20 +++-
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e5ebcc4..035b335 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ Devel-CheckOS-1.50.tar.gz
/Devel-CheckOS-1.71.tar.gz
/Devel-CheckOS-1.72.tar.gz
/Devel-CheckOS-1.73.tar.gz
+/Devel-CheckOS-1.75.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec b/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec
index d3afa1f..7ee4311 100644
--- a/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec
+++ b/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
Name: perl-Devel-CheckOS
-Version:1.73
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:1.75
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Check what OS we're running on
-License:GPLv2 or Artistic
+# Devel/AssertOS/Extending.pod: CC-BY-SA
+# Devel/CheckOS/Families.pod: CC-BY-SA
+# Other files: GPLv2 or Artistic
+License:(GPLv2 or Artistic) and CC-BY-SA
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-CheckOS/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DC/DCANTRELL/Devel-CheckOS-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -18,10 +21,11 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Data::Dumper)
BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Find::Rule) = 0.28
BuildRequires: perl(vars)
+BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
# Tests:
BuildRequires: perl(Cwd)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp) = 0.19
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.62
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.88
# Optional tests:
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
@@ -53,13 +57,19 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {}
\;
make test
%files
-%doc ARTISTIC.txt CHANGELOG GPL2.txt README TODO
+%license ARTISTIC.txt GPL2.txt
+%doc CHANGELOG README TODO
%{_bindir}/use-devel-assertos
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man1/use-devel-assertos.1.gz
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Thu Mar 12 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.75-1
+- 1.75 bump
+- Correct license from (GPLv2 or Artistic) to ((GPLv2 or Artistic) and
+ CC-BY-SA)
+
* Fri Aug 29 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.73-2
- Perl 5.20 rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 05d2d74..6d936c9 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-dcb8cc726f7f6a1faa7230ed2b044a03 Devel-CheckOS-1.73.tar.gz
+0bbd8a010530d09d4f9f3e350d729163 Devel-CheckOS-1.75.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1201304] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.038 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201304 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Scratch build succeeded http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9209976 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZBnqNi6INla=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1201303] perl-Pod-Spell-1.17 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201303 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Scratch build succeeded http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9209974 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eNqCUXqyyta=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Devel-CheckOS/f20] Correct license from (GPLv2 or Artistic) to ((GPLv2 or Artistic) and CC-BY-SA)
commit 8dc0a002d8882892194f9ffef7c4ca9d3d2cff4e
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 12 14:38:43 2015 +0100
Correct license from (GPLv2 or Artistic) to ((GPLv2 or Artistic) and
CC-BY-SA)
perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec | 11 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec b/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec
index 7fa377b..ea4db39 100644
--- a/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec
+++ b/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
Name: perl-Devel-CheckOS
Version:1.71
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Release:4%{?dist}
Summary:Check what OS we're running on
-License:GPLv2 or Artistic
+# Devel/AssertOS/Extending.pod: CC-BY-SA
+# Devel/CheckOS/Families.pod: CC-BY-SA
+# Other files: GPLv2 or Artistic
+License:(GPLv2 or Artistic) and CC-BY-SA
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-CheckOS/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DC/DCANTRELL/Devel-CheckOS-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -60,6 +63,10 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Thu Mar 12 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.71-4
+- Correct license from (GPLv2 or Artistic) to ((GPLv2 or Artistic) and
+ CC-BY-SA)
+
* Sun Aug 04 2013 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.71-3
- Perl 5.18 rebuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1199064] perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.74 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199064 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.75-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.75-1.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ra3Xpy1UV2a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File PPIx-Regexp-0.038.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPIx-Regexp: 7b17611185bc07bc505ceb35a4125242 PPIx-Regexp-0.038.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Harden_all_packages_with_position-independent_code + guile modules
On 12/03/15 14:41, Adam Jackson wrote: On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 13:45 +, Petr Pisar wrote: However I can add my recent story: After hardening perl, loading a DSO by perl failed. I believe the reason was the DSO had an undefined symbol which was not defined in any SO_NEEDed libraries. But because the symbol was never used at run-time, before hardening the executable, run-time linking passed. But after hardening, the -znow feature caused resolving all symbols at link time, including the missing symbol, so dlopen(3) failed. We may want to revisit this, honestly. The actual proposal was just to build executables as PIE, right? Forcing -z now is a bit more than maybe was expected. On top of which there seems, despite a number of questions posted here since the change went live, very little assistance from the proposal owners with fixing packages that have been broken by it. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: openQA live image testing: ready for merge?
On 2015-03-12 02:50, Josef Skladanka wrote: Adam, please set these up for review in Phabricator. I strongly suspect (given the time that I spent looking at the changes so far) that some discussion will be required, and Phab is _the_ place to do it. Also, please make sure to rebase your repos to their current state, before creating the phab reviews. For further development, I'd suggest creating an account on Bitbucket, and using the core repos - all the FedoraQA Devs can write to the repos, and all the admins and administer it. Once you have the accound, I'll add you to the Dev group, and having a feature branch in the core repo seems quite better, given the development work-flows we currently adhere to. Sure, will do. IIRC, when I sent my last round, you didn't have the openQA stuff set up for review in Phab so you asked for email, so I just figured to carry on that way. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
Re: Why -mtune=atom?
- Original Message - The default CFLAGS set by RPM include “-mtune-atom”. Why? I doubt Atom CPUs are Fedora's primary target. It's what's used in many lower price tablets, all-in-ones and laptops. I would think it fits with the enthusiast target. It's not even a documented GCC option. There is such a wide variety of CPUs under this label that it's not even clear what it would mean. If it's better than “-mtune=generic” or the GCC default, shouldn't GCC be fixed? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1201304] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.038 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201304 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- ppisar's perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.038-1.fc23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=619734 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LYrJvKkS9ya=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File CGI-Fast-2.09.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CGI-Fast: 32d39d89a9ff3a596eb891e602a0f703 CGI-Fast-2.09.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Pod-Spell/f22] 1.17 bump
commit 240c6c486f8f5a7e4328f0cd51b303a4ef9c7555
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 12 15:35:06 2015 +0100
1.17 bump
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Pod-Spell.spec | 11 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index c24521c..3cd084f 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@ Pod-Spell-1.01.tar.gz
/Pod-Spell-1.14.tar.gz
/Pod-Spell-1.15.tar.gz
/Pod-Spell-1.16.tar.gz
+/Pod-Spell-1.17.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Pod-Spell.spec b/perl-Pod-Spell.spec
index 97af81d..d2fa0b2 100644
--- a/perl-Pod-Spell.spec
+++ b/perl-Pod-Spell.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Pod-Spell
-Version:1.16
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:1.17
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:A formatter for spell-checking POD
Group: Development/Libraries
License:Artistic 2.0
@@ -18,12 +18,10 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(Class::Tiny)
BuildRequires: perl(constant)
BuildRequires: perl(File::ShareDir::ProjectDistDir) = 1.000
-BuildRequires: perl(I18N::Langinfo)
BuildRequires: perl(Lingua::EN::Inflect)
BuildRequires: perl(locale)
BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Escapes)
BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Parser)
-BuildRequires: perl(POSIX)
BuildRequires: perl(Text::Wrap)
# Tests:
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
@@ -34,8 +32,6 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Test::Deep)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.88
BuildRequires: perl(utf8)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
-Requires: perl(I18N::Langinfo)
-Requires: perl(POSIX)
%description
Pod::Spell is a Pod formatter whose output is good for spell-checking.
@@ -70,6 +66,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
%changelog
+* Thu Mar 12 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.17-1
+- 1.17 bump
+
* Wed Feb 25 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.16-2
- Specify all dependencies
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 8824b66..7df9a39 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-3a58091842ca89dbe7e72887700d7a68 Pod-Spell-1.16.tar.gz
+b0895135155569ad4f8903ab11cbeb0b Pod-Spell-1.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1201304] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.038 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201304 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.038-1.fc ||23 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-03-12 10:46:24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3Nv8YRNN7Ha=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1201267] perl-Encode-2.71 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201267 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Encode-2.71-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Encode-2.71-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mRM6oEUmLqa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: mpich 3.1.4 in rawhide - soname changes
On 12.03.2015 14:25, Martyn Foster wrote: On 12 March 2015 at 09:51, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com mailto:manisan...@gmail.com wrote: On 11.03.2015 20:51, Orion Poplawski wrote: I updated mpich 3.1 to 3.1.4 in rawhide. I wouldn't have thought this would make a difference, but apparently upstream decided to rename libraries (libmpich.so.12 - libmpi.so.12) and drop a sub-library (libopa.so.1), apparently not having any understanding of how sonames work. Or perhaps I'm just naive in thinking a 3.1 - 3.1.4 version jump shouldn't introduce ABI incompatible changes. So, things need to be rebuilt in rawhide. I checked in the changes to F22 have haven't built yet. mpich needs a rebuild in F22 though I think for fortran mod api changes. Looks like MPI_BIN=/usr/lib/mpich/bin is now MPI_BIN=/usr/lib/mpi/bin whereas i.e. MPI_LIB=/usr/lib/mpich/lib is still using mpich. I suppose this should be fixed? openmpi seems to be using /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/ /usr/lib64/openmpi/lib/ so perhaps the mpich option is better than a generic mpi? Yes, and this is the way it was before. I'd say this is just an oversight in mpich-modules.patch [1], @MPILIBNAME@ changed for the libmpich.so - libmpi.so rename, and it ended up having this side effect. [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/mpich.git/tree/mpich-modules.patch -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1199064] perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.74 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199064 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.75-1.f ||c23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oIm5f18xFQa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Pod-Spell] 1.17 bump
commit 024a589010cb1ad6cedb9800e74e9c6d678990ce
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 12 15:35:06 2015 +0100
1.17 bump
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Pod-Spell.spec | 11 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index c24521c..3cd084f 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@ Pod-Spell-1.01.tar.gz
/Pod-Spell-1.14.tar.gz
/Pod-Spell-1.15.tar.gz
/Pod-Spell-1.16.tar.gz
+/Pod-Spell-1.17.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Pod-Spell.spec b/perl-Pod-Spell.spec
index 97af81d..d2fa0b2 100644
--- a/perl-Pod-Spell.spec
+++ b/perl-Pod-Spell.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Pod-Spell
-Version:1.16
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:1.17
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:A formatter for spell-checking POD
Group: Development/Libraries
License:Artistic 2.0
@@ -18,12 +18,10 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(Class::Tiny)
BuildRequires: perl(constant)
BuildRequires: perl(File::ShareDir::ProjectDistDir) = 1.000
-BuildRequires: perl(I18N::Langinfo)
BuildRequires: perl(Lingua::EN::Inflect)
BuildRequires: perl(locale)
BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Escapes)
BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Parser)
-BuildRequires: perl(POSIX)
BuildRequires: perl(Text::Wrap)
# Tests:
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
@@ -34,8 +32,6 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Test::Deep)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.88
BuildRequires: perl(utf8)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
-Requires: perl(I18N::Langinfo)
-Requires: perl(POSIX)
%description
Pod::Spell is a Pod formatter whose output is good for spell-checking.
@@ -70,6 +66,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
%changelog
+* Thu Mar 12 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.17-1
+- 1.17 bump
+
* Wed Feb 25 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.16-2
- Specify all dependencies
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 8824b66..7df9a39 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-3a58091842ca89dbe7e72887700d7a68 Pod-Spell-1.16.tar.gz
+b0895135155569ad4f8903ab11cbeb0b Pod-Spell-1.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Devel-CheckOS/f22] 1.75 bump; Correct license from (GPLv2 or Artistic) to ((GPLv2 or Artistic) and CC-BY-SA)
commit a431d0d48354b4fc2ac355d6d56839bb00ea29f3
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 12 14:23:42 2015 +0100
1.75 bump; Correct license from (GPLv2 or Artistic) to ((GPLv2 or Artistic)
and CC-BY-SA)
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec | 20 +++-
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e5ebcc4..035b335 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ Devel-CheckOS-1.50.tar.gz
/Devel-CheckOS-1.71.tar.gz
/Devel-CheckOS-1.72.tar.gz
/Devel-CheckOS-1.73.tar.gz
+/Devel-CheckOS-1.75.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec b/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec
index d3afa1f..7ee4311 100644
--- a/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec
+++ b/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
Name: perl-Devel-CheckOS
-Version:1.73
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:1.75
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Check what OS we're running on
-License:GPLv2 or Artistic
+# Devel/AssertOS/Extending.pod: CC-BY-SA
+# Devel/CheckOS/Families.pod: CC-BY-SA
+# Other files: GPLv2 or Artistic
+License:(GPLv2 or Artistic) and CC-BY-SA
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-CheckOS/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DC/DCANTRELL/Devel-CheckOS-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -18,10 +21,11 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Data::Dumper)
BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Find::Rule) = 0.28
BuildRequires: perl(vars)
+BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
# Tests:
BuildRequires: perl(Cwd)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp) = 0.19
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.62
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.88
# Optional tests:
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
@@ -53,13 +57,19 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {}
\;
make test
%files
-%doc ARTISTIC.txt CHANGELOG GPL2.txt README TODO
+%license ARTISTIC.txt GPL2.txt
+%doc CHANGELOG README TODO
%{_bindir}/use-devel-assertos
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man1/use-devel-assertos.1.gz
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Thu Mar 12 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.75-1
+- 1.75 bump
+- Correct license from (GPLv2 or Artistic) to ((GPLv2 or Artistic) and
+ CC-BY-SA)
+
* Fri Aug 29 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.73-2
- Perl 5.20 rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 05d2d74..6d936c9 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-dcb8cc726f7f6a1faa7230ed2b044a03 Devel-CheckOS-1.73.tar.gz
+0bbd8a010530d09d4f9f3e350d729163 Devel-CheckOS-1.75.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1201303] New: perl-Pod-Spell-1.17 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201303 Bug ID: 1201303 Summary: perl-Pod-Spell-1.17 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Pod-Spell Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 1.17 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.16-2.fc23 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Pod-Spell/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YBHkn2gst5a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1201304] New: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.038 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201304 Bug ID: 1201304 Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.038 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.038 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.037-1.fc22 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PPIx-Regexp/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kVLvVcWRzXa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1201305] New: perl-Prima-1.42 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201305 Bug ID: 1201305 Summary: perl-Prima-1.42 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Prima Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 1.42 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.41-1.fc22 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Prima/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LtjrnK0emFa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Harden_all_packages_with_position-independent_code + guile modules
On 2015-03-12, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos n...@redhat.com wrote: In rawhide building the gnutls guile bindings fails, and that's related to the new hardening flags being enabled with [0]. The failure is quite peculiar since the loading of a dynamic module fails [1] which already is position independent. [...] [1]. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196556 The test-suite.log reads file not found which is far from loading DSO failed. However I can add my recent story: After hardening perl, loading a DSO by perl failed. I believe the reason was the DSO had an undefined symbol which was not defined in any SO_NEEDed libraries. But because the symbol was never used at run-time, before hardening the executable, run-time linking passed. But after hardening, the -znow feature caused resolving all symbols at link time, including the missing symbol, so dlopen(3) failed. -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1201303] perl-Pod-Spell-1.17 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201303 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Pod-Spell-1.17-1.fc23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=N0A9NZ26E4a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Why -mtune=atom?
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote: The default CFLAGS set by RPM include “-mtune-atom”. Why? I doubt Atom CPUs are Fedora's primary target. It's not even a documented GCC option. There is such a wide variety of CPUs under this label that it's not even clear what it would mean. Well because at that time atoms where the only newly sold i686 hardware. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Complicated RPM dependency generator question
What I've done here is to write a custom internal dependency generator, using the documentation here: http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/DependencyGenerator Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Why -mtune=atom?
Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) said: The default CFLAGS set by RPM include “-mtune-atom”. Why? I doubt Atom CPUs are Fedora's primary target. It's not even a documented GCC option. There is such a wide variety of CPUs under this label that it's not even clear what it would mean. If it's better than “-mtune=generic” or the GCC default, shouldn't GCC be fixed? https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2009-June/msg01506.html (Yes, it's possible things have changed - benchmarks would be welcome.) Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: openQA live image testing: ready for merge?
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 08:34 -0400, Josef Skladanka wrote: Some preliminary feedback: = openqa_fedora = == _do_install_and_reboot.pm == Please delete the anaconda_install_finish needle, if it is unused. Don't recall that one off the top of my head (I'm on a bus, on my laptop) - I'll look. anaconda_install_done needle: * Why is only a part of the button selected? Because the button says 'Reboot' on non-lives but 'Done' or 'Quit' or something on lives (because it just exits the installer, it doesn't reboot). I wanted to avoid duplicating the needle. The text is the same for both (as long as you're in English), and we need to click the button so we need to capture a bit of it. * What is the logic behind assert_and_click for multiple areas in one needle? Seems like the click is done on the last of the areas (judging from the contents of the needle) - is this _always_ true? The documentation states that it will click the centre of the *smallest* area. == main.pm == ad the contents of: _boot_to_default.pm _live_run_anaconda.pm _anaconda_select_language.pm I'm absolutely for splitting this up a bit, but I'd rather have it done in a slightly different way: * rename _boot_to_default.pm to something in the likes of _handle_bootloader.pm (/me is bad with names, but it really just handles the grub options...) My thinking there was that we are likely to want to do *other* stuff from the bootloader; we have test cases for the media checks, for booting from the local disk, for running memtest, etc. So I didn't want to name it too generically. Now, if you think the best design for those would be to add them into this needle with conditionals, then the more generic name would make sense for sure. * merge _live_run_anaconda.pm and _anaconda_select_language.pm into one file, and call it something like _get_to_anaconda_main_hub.pm Yeah, sorry, I just remembered after sending the email that you'd suggested that - it still seems like a good idea, I'll get to it soon. === anaconda_spoke_done.json === Why change the needle, and why in this particular manner? The change looks unnecessary. If there is no particular reason for it, please revert to previous version. Sorry, indeed I should've explained that. It's quite subtle and it stumped me for a while. The existing needle is only a 95% match for at least one point where it's used on the live image, because for some reason when running inside GNOME, the button has a faint white dashed rectangle within it; I stared at screenshots for like half an hour before realizing what was happening. So I could either lower the needle's tolerance, or tweak the match area to try and get it over the threshold. I went into GIMP, zoomed in real close, and selected as much of the button as is not susceptible to color-dependent anti-aliasing; that was enough to get the match above 96%. We can go with lowering the tolerance instead, if you like. === bootloader_bios_live.json === The black area (last match area in the needle) is IMHO quite useless - I suspect it is a remain of the original bootloader needle. If there isn't a reason for having it there, please remove the area from the needle. I'll take a look. I actually wanted to use the same needle for both, but unfortunately the background of the bootloader is different colors on live vs. non-live :( === gdm.json === I'm not sure why you selected the particular bit of the screen, but it does not really make much sense to me. Why did you not select any of the more distinct areas of the gdm screen? Because I believe that area is most likely to remain consistent and unique. For the user name, well, we'll likely have test cases with different user names and even more than one user (for the 'desktop login' test). Also, it's a selectable widget, which presents a couple of problems. GNOME changes the theme quite often, so the selection highlight color might change. And it's susceptible to being selected or not selected. The 'Fedora' logo seems like an 'obvious' choice, except it's been pretty changeable lately. It was only added in, like, 20 or 21, I think, and its size has changed too, I think. As a meta note: I'm taking kind of a general approach of trying to make generic needles for a given screen for recognition purposes, with the expectation that if you need to do something specific on the screen that you can't do from the 'recognition' needle, you'll create another. Also, I'd really like for the needle files to be named as close to the tag (i.e. graphical_login ) as possible, I know that you probably made this with other login managers in mind, but please use graphical_login_gdm as the name of the file, instead of plain gdm. Sure, can do. == conf_test_suites.py == I'm fairly certain that both default_install and package_set_minimal cover QA:Testcase_install_to_VirtIO. Sure, makes sense. I was aiming for minimal change from the existing
[Bug 1201303] perl-Pod-Spell-1.17 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201303 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- jplesnik's perl-Pod-Spell-1.17-1.fc23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=619732 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PXWLmojtuDa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-PPIx-Regexp] 0.038 bump
commit b251bec5f68951e4d1b4f8bdd51db158275cd21c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 12 15:39:17 2015 +0100
0.038 bump
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec | 8 ++--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 13dbe47..0dfb66e 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -26,3 +26,4 @@ PPIx-Regexp-0.007.tar.gz
/PPIx-Regexp-0.035.tar.gz
/PPIx-Regexp-0.036.tar.gz
/PPIx-Regexp-0.037.tar.gz
+/PPIx-Regexp-0.038.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec b/perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec
index e508c0e..7b12864 100644
--- a/perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec
+++ b/perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-PPIx-Regexp
-Version:0.037
+Version:0.038
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Represent a regular expression of some sort
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -61,11 +61,15 @@ perl Build.PL installdirs=vendor
./Build test
%files
-%doc Changes eg LICENSES README
+%license LICENSES
+%doc Changes eg README
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Thu Mar 12 2015 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.038-1
+- 0.038 bump
+
* Fri Nov 14 2014 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.037-1
- 0.037 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 6899390..9a52cd8 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-82d746929544d766a9a005a4c0763fce PPIx-Regexp-0.037.tar.gz
+7b17611185bc07bc505ceb35a4125242 PPIx-Regexp-0.038.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Devel-CheckOS-1.75.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-CheckOS: 0bbd8a010530d09d4f9f3e350d729163 Devel-CheckOS-1.75.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: mpich 3.1.4 in rawhide - soname changes
On 12 March 2015 at 09:51, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote: On 11.03.2015 20:51, Orion Poplawski wrote: I updated mpich 3.1 to 3.1.4 in rawhide. I wouldn't have thought this would make a difference, but apparently upstream decided to rename libraries (libmpich.so.12 - libmpi.so.12) and drop a sub-library (libopa.so.1), apparently not having any understanding of how sonames work. Or perhaps I'm just naive in thinking a 3.1 - 3.1.4 version jump shouldn't introduce ABI incompatible changes. So, things need to be rebuilt in rawhide. I checked in the changes to F22 have haven't built yet. mpich needs a rebuild in F22 though I think for fortran mod api changes. Looks like MPI_BIN=/usr/lib/mpich/bin is now MPI_BIN=/usr/lib/mpi/bin whereas i.e. MPI_LIB=/usr/lib/mpich/lib is still using mpich. I suppose this should be fixed? openmpi seems to be using /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/ /usr/lib64/openmpi/lib/ so perhaps the mpich option is better than a generic mpi? Martyn -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1201305] perl-Prima-1.42 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201305 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Scratch build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9209978 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aVXg9XzqYTa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1201303] perl-Pod-Spell-1.17 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201303 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Pod-Spell-1.17-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Spell-1.17-1.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DZgEOiseupa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Harden_all_packages_with_position-independent_code + guile modules
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 13:45 +, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2015-03-12, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos n...@redhat.com wrote: In rawhide building the gnutls guile bindings fails, and that's related to the new hardening flags being enabled with [0]. The failure is quite peculiar since the loading of a dynamic module fails [1] which already is position independent. [...] [1]. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196556 The test-suite.log reads file not found which is far from loading DSO failed. However I can add my recent story: After hardening perl, loading a DSO by perl failed. I believe the reason was the DSO had an undefined symbol which was not defined in any SO_NEEDed libraries. But because the symbol was never used at run-time, before hardening the executable, run-time linking passed. But after hardening, the -znow feature caused resolving all symbols at link time, including the missing symbol, so dlopen(3) failed. We may want to revisit this, honestly. The actual proposal was just to build executables as PIE, right? Forcing -z now is a bit more than maybe was expected. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[perl-DBI] Fix a confusing typo
commit 402260ef98d1227546286253ba606ba4605ac4d3
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 12 15:42:32 2015 +0100
Fix a confusing typo
perl-DBI.spec | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBI.spec b/perl-DBI.spec
index 4d30dac..6de1d0f 100644
--- a/perl-DBI.spec
+++ b/perl-DBI.spec
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ URL:http://dbi.perl.org/
# The source tarball must be repackaged to remove the DBI/FAQ.pm, since the
# license is not a FSF free license.
# When upgrading, download the new source tarball, and run
-# ./repackage.sh version to produce the -repackaged tarball.
+# ./repackage.sh version to produce the _repackaged tarball.
# Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/T/TI/TIMB/DBI-%{version}.tar.gz
Source0:DBI-%{version}_repackaged.tar.gz
BuildRequires: perl
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[fusioninventory-agent/epel7] (5 commits) ...new sources
Summary of changes: 15aae5f... building as noarch (*) 7d1aff0... forgot mail adress (*) c12955a... re-enabling arch and excluding debug (*) 56a0d5a... update to 2.3.16 (*) 75a659f... new sources (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Devel-CheckOS/f21] Correct license from (GPLv2 or Artistic) to ((GPLv2 or Artistic) and CC-BY-SA)
commit b7d7f77c7175dc2962a77da706f738564dbe85b8
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 12 14:35:25 2015 +0100
Correct license from (GPLv2 or Artistic) to ((GPLv2 or Artistic) and
CC-BY-SA)
perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec | 11 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec b/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec
index 0c6b3ee..f9d4d00 100644
--- a/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec
+++ b/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
Name: perl-Devel-CheckOS
Version:1.73
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Check what OS we're running on
-License:GPLv2 or Artistic
+# Devel/AssertOS/Extending.pod: CC-BY-SA
+# Devel/CheckOS/Families.pod: CC-BY-SA
+# Other files: GPLv2 or Artistic
+License:(GPLv2 or Artistic) and CC-BY-SA
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-CheckOS/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DC/DCANTRELL/Devel-CheckOS-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -60,6 +63,10 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Thu Mar 12 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.73-2
+- Correct license from (GPLv2 or Artistic) to ((GPLv2 or Artistic) and
+ CC-BY-SA)
+
* Tue Aug 05 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.73-1
- 1.73 bump
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Pod-Spell-1.17.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Pod-Spell: b0895135155569ad4f8903ab11cbeb0b Pod-Spell-1.17.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: dnf and yum works different
Hi On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Adrian Soliard wrote: Recently, I run dnf update, then yum update, and I notice that yum detect 2 packages (fros-recordmydesktop-1.0-5.fc21.noarch and, from adobe repo, flash-plugin-11.2.202.451-release.x86_64). The case was present on two different computers Why dnf don't recognize that packages? http://dnf.readthedocs.org/en/latest/user_faq.html#why-do-i-get-different-results-with-dnf-upgrade-vs-yum-update dnf update --refresh might be what you are looking for Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Beaker in Fedora infra ansible
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 11:34:47 +1000 Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com wrote: Looking at the Fedora infra ansible git repo, it seems like there is a skeleton for managing beaker01.qa.fedoraproject.org, but just the system and OS, not the Beaker application itself. (Unless I missed something?) Yeah, it's just a skeleton - I wanted to make sure that the setup would work before putting the effort into ansible-izing it. I'd like to try and contribute a patch for Beaker server/lab controller roles. Where is the preferred place to iterate on that? Is there an open Phab issue, or should I just mail this list, or something else? I created a ticket to track the playbook role creation. https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T435 We can create another instance to work with but it might be easier to take the setup I wrote for the standalone taskotron instance and adapt that to work with local VMs to start with. The setup and execution wouldn't be identical but the same general concept of overriding the infra-specific role dependencies should work with beaker as well. https://bitbucket.org/fedoraqa/taskotron-ansible I'm sure it will take me quite a few attempts to get right :-) since I haven't done anything with Fedora infra ansible before. Yeah, there was a bit of a learning curve for me to figure out how that stuff works as well. Let us know if you have any questions about how stuff is set up. Tim pgpzgOUwEaGDg.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
[perl-CGI-Fast] 2.09 bump
commit 1ed54ff195f399ae9a998ac93dc4fec8a9f72465
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 12 16:01:16 2015 +0100
2.09 bump
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-CGI-Fast.spec | 5 -
sources| 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 9406363..e435236 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
/CGI-Fast-2.04.tar.gz
/CGI-Fast-2.05.tar.gz
/CGI-Fast-2.07.tar.gz
+/CGI-Fast-2.09.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-CGI-Fast.spec b/perl-CGI-Fast.spec
index c1b79d8..43171f2 100644
--- a/perl-CGI-Fast.spec
+++ b/perl-CGI-Fast.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-CGI-Fast
-Version:2.07
+Version:2.09
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:CGI Interface for Fast CGI
# lib/CGI/Fast.pm probably qotes piece of Artistic license before declaring
@@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Thu Mar 12 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 2.09-1
+- 2.09 bump
+
* Mon Feb 23 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 2.07-1
- 2.07 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index efb0925..3c1ecda 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-73e336cb0847c349a6d6cd7b3e0bbf82 CGI-Fast-2.07.tar.gz
+32d39d89a9ff3a596eb891e602a0f703 CGI-Fast-2.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] remi:perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen watchbugzilla set to Obsolete
user: remi set for remi acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f22 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] remi:perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen commit set to Obsolete
user: remi set for remi acl: commit of package: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] remi:perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen watchcommits set to Obsolete
user: remi set for remi acl: watchcommits of package: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f21 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] remi:perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen approveacls set to Obsolete
user: remi set for remi acl: approveacls of package: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f20 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] remi:perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen watchcommits set to Obsolete
user: remi set for remi acl: watchcommits of package: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: master To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] remi:perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen commit set to Obsolete
user: remi set for remi acl: commit of package: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: master To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] remi:perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen watchbugzilla set to Obsolete
user: remi set for remi acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: master To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] remi:perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen approveacls set to Obsolete
user: remi set for remi acl: approveacls of package: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: master To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] remi:perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen watchbugzilla set to Obsolete
user: remi set for remi acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] remi:perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen commit set to Obsolete
user: remi set for remi acl: commit of package: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f22 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] remi:perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen watchcommits set to Obsolete
user: remi set for remi acl: watchcommits of package: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f20 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File List-Compare-0.49.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-List-Compare: fb8ac390f7a5a8757025467d577ec4b4 List-Compare-0.49.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] remi:perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen watchcommits set to Obsolete
user: remi set for remi acl: watchcommits of package: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-List-Compare] 0.49 bump, metadata updates
commit 8e989856c2c0c74cff8d26d54c1e29e7ff3165de
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Mar 12 16:15:17 2015 +0100
0.49 bump, metadata updates
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-List-Compare.spec | 5 -
sources| 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 7e1e5d8..f45aa1e 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ List-Compare-0.37.tar.gz
/List-Compare-0.46.tar.gz
/List-Compare-0.47.tar.gz
/List-Compare-0.48.tar.gz
+/List-Compare-0.49.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-List-Compare.spec b/perl-List-Compare.spec
index bb6847f..ef60032 100644
--- a/perl-List-Compare.spec
+++ b/perl-List-Compare.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-List-Compare
-Version:0.48
+Version:0.49
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Compare elements of two or more lists
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
%changelog
+* Thu Mar 12 2015 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.49-1
+- 0.49 bump, metadata updates
+
* Thu Feb 26 2015 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.48-1
- 0.48 bump, yet even more performance improvements
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 00c8ec7..8234003 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-533457924eceadae61960a89c4cc6aea List-Compare-0.48.tar.gz
+fb8ac390f7a5a8757025467d577ec4b4 List-Compare-0.49.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] remi:perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen watchbugzilla set to Obsolete
user: remi set for remi acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f21 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-Authen -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Prima/f22] 1.42 bump
Summary of changes: 4f6e567... 1.42 bump (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
