Re: Non-responsive maintainer vdolezal

[Josef Ridky]

Followup info for exception procedure for non-responsive maintainer policy.

vdolezal has left the company last year and become inactive in Fedora 
environment.
Due of he is the single owner of screen package and there is CVE issue, that 
need to be addressed, I am requesting exception procedure for non-responsive 
maintainer policy.
vdolezal used corporate email in his FAS account, that now become inactive and 
I am not aware of any way, how can we contact him at the moment.

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.

- Original Message -
| From: "Josef Ridky" 
| To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" 

| Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 8:35:58 AM
| Subject: Non-responsive maintainer vdolezal
| 
| This message is part of non-responsive maintainer procedure for vdolezal,
| following
| 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/.
| 
| Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maintain screen.
| 
| If anyone else know, how to contact this maintainer, please forward him this
| message ASAP.
| 
| Corresponding bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930009
| 
| Josef Ridky
| Senior Software Engineer
| Core Services Team
| Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
| ___
| devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
| To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
| Fedora Code of Conduct:
| https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
| List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
| List Archives:
| https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
| Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
| https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
| 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210218.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210217.0):

ID: 781285  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/781285
ID: 781297  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/781297

Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Non-responsive maintainer vdolezal

[Josef Ridky]

This message is part of non-responsive maintainer procedure for vdolezal, 
following 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/.

Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maintain screen.

If anyone else know, how to contact this maintainer, please forward him this 
message ASAP.

Corresponding bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930009

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Don't update to the latest f33!

[Ed Greshko]

On 18/02/2021 09:18, Steve Dickson wrote:


On 2/17/21 6:55 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 18/02/2021 05:11, Steve Dickson wrote:

I agree... ignoring syntax error or parsing error just does not seem
like the appropriate thing to do... Error out! Tell me what is broken
so I can fix it!!

Replace the "," with a " " in the DNS= entry of /etc/systemd/resolved.conf file.

And if you didn't format it that way, find out who did.

That is the question!!! I upgraded and DNS broke!

I didn't even know there was a /etc/systemd/resolved.conf
file until this unfortunate experience...


I know this won't make you feel any better.  But the problem you've seen has 
probably always existed
on your system but was "hidden" from view.

Previously the default for FallbackDNS as shown in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf 
was

#FallbackDNS=1.1.1.1 8.8.8.8 1.0.0.1 8.8.4.4 2606:4700:4700:: 
2001:4860:4860::
 2606:4700:4700::1001 2001:4860:4860::884

But many folks complained that they didn't want a Fallback defined pointing to 
Google or
other "services".  So, it was removed and is now

#FallbackDNS=

Meaning none are defined.

So, previously, if your DNS= entry was incorrect you'd be protected by the 
existence of the Fallback being
defined.  Now, they are not.

So, whoever supplied the badly formatted /etc/systemd/resolved.conf file is the 
"real" culprit.

If I recall, you're using a VM supplied by a vendor?  If so, have you notified 
them?

--
People who believe they don't make mistakes have already made one.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-87e6bb3010   
chromium-88.0.4324.150-1.el8
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-610589457a   
prosody-0.11.8-1.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

cscppc-1.8.2-1.el8
csdiff-2.1.0-1.el8
csmock-2.7.1-1.el8
cswrap-1.9.1-1.el8
gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons-39-1.el8
libmysofa-1.2-4.el8
snapd-2.49-2.el8
zork-1.0.2-6.el8

Details about builds:



 cscppc-1.8.2-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-8012d9be02)
 A compiler wrapper that runs cppcheck in background

Update Information:

- update to latest upstream release

ChangeLog:

* Wed Feb 17 2021 Kamil Dudka  1.8.2-1
- update to latest upstream release
* Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.8.1-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild




 csdiff-2.1.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-8012d9be02)
 Non-interactive tools for processing code scan results in plain-text

Update Information:

- update to latest upstream release

ChangeLog:

* Wed Feb 17 2021 Kamil Dudka  2.1.0-1
- update to latest upstream release




 csmock-2.7.1-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-8012d9be02)
 A mock wrapper for Static Analysis tools

Update Information:

- update to latest upstream release

ChangeLog:

* Wed Feb 17 2021 Kamil Dudka  2.7.1-1
- update to latest upstream release




 cswrap-1.9.1-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-8012d9be02)
 Generic compiler wrapper

Update Information:

- update to latest upstream release

ChangeLog:

* Wed Feb 17 2021 Kamil Dudka  1.9.1-1
- update to latest upstream
* Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.9.0-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild




 gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons-39-1.el8 
(FEDORA-EPEL-2021-c9ea37f8fd)
 Show app icons on top of the windows thumbnails in Activities Overview

Update Information:

Bump to upstream version 39, which is based on version 35, the last
WindowOverlay Icons release for GNOME 3.32 to 3.36.

ChangeLog:

* Tue Feb 16 2021 Audrey Toskin  - 39-1
- Bump to upstream version 39, which just fixes some metadata bugs.
* Mon Aug  3 2020 Audrey Toskin  - 35-1
- Bump to upstream version 35.
* Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 34-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild




 libmysofa-1.2-4.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-bfa4482ae0)
 C functions for reading HRTFs

Update Information:

Fixes various security issues by upgrading to the current 1.2 version.

ChangeLog:

* Mon Feb  8 2021 Nicolas Chauvet  - 1.2-4
- Update to 1.2
* Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild
* Sat Aug  1 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-3
- Second attempt - Rebuilt for
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jul 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.1-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild

References:

Re: Don't update to the latest f33!

[Steve Dickson]

On 2/17/21 6:55 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 18/02/2021 05:11, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> I agree... ignoring syntax error or parsing error just does not seem
>> like the appropriate thing to do... Error out! Tell me what is broken
>> so I can fix it!!
> 
> Replace the "," with a " " in the DNS= entry of /etc/systemd/resolved.conf 
> file.
> 
> And if you didn't format it that way, find out who did.
That is the question!!! I upgraded and DNS broke!

I didn't even know there was a /etc/systemd/resolved.conf
file until this unfortunate experience... 

> 
> And, if you've never made an incorrect format in a configuration file in your 
> life, consider yourself
> lucky.  The worst ones are formatting failures which occur silently yet 
> things don't work.
> 
Of course I have... when I change things and break things I see the 
error... but in this case I upgraded (aka I changed nothing) and the
error was ignored... Killing my DNS... That is a bug.. IMHO.. 

steved.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

rpm-ostree v2021.2

[Kelvin Fan]

## Strengthening the notion of an "updates driver"
Distributions like Fedora CoreOS have been making use of external (to 
rpm-ostree) agents that work as "drivers" for automatic updates. For example, 
in FCOS, Zincati is the agent that is responsible for communicating with an 
updates server to identify legal update paths and scheduling updates. In FCOS, 
there are certain well-tested paths for updates, dead-end releases, as well as 
"barrier updates". Agents like Zincati interact with rpm-ostree on behalf of 
the admin to make the right decisions for seamless automatic updates.

However, prior to this release, rpm-ostree had been allowing manual updates via 
`rpm-ostree upgrade`. Because rpm-ostree has no knowledge of update graphs, the 
problem with this is that it would allow for admins to e.g. blow past FCOS' 
barrier updates, or update to releases that aren't meant to be reached from the 
current release.

The client-side now supports a `--register-driver` command to tell rpm-ostree 
that another service is actively "driving" updates. This lets rpm-ostree know 
some basic information about the updates driver (name and systemd unit) and 
allows rpm-ostree to be aware that updates should not be done manually. 
`rpm-ostree status` now shows the state of the registered updates driver, as 
well.

In concert with this, `rpm-ostree upgrade` now emits an error message if a 
driver is registered. Nevertheless, there are scenarios where admins may want 
to force an upgrade despite an updates driver being present on the system; a 
possible scenario would be when the admin knows of an available update and 
would like to immediately upgrade to it, but the updates driver hasn't detected 
it yet (possibly due to phased rollouts or low update-checking cadence), or the 
updates driver has scheduled it for later. `rpm-ostree upgrade` offers a 
`--bypass-driver` option to address scenarios like this. This option should be 
used with caution, and ideally only when the admin knows that the update target 
moves along a legal edge in the distribution's updates graph. In the future, we 
would like more communication between rpm-ostree and its updates driver and 
have rpm-ostree check with the updates driver before doing a manual upgrade.

PRs: https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/2459, 
https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/2525, and 
https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/2566

## Compose

There is a new `rpm-ostree compose extensions` which will be used by RHEL 
CoreOS, but is intended to be generally usable by rpm-ostree users that want to 
more cleanly split their builds into "base OS image" + "optional extensions 
(RPMs)", while reusing the same declarative manifest format.
PR: https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/2439

## Core changes

rpm-ostree now better supports a newer libsolv that uses `%{_dbpath}` to find 
the rpm database.
(This fix was already backported into Fedora)
Issue: https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/issues/2548

## Internals

[Change main entrypoint to be 
Rust](https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/2502) is a huge milestone - 
rpm-ostree is now a Rust application with an internal C++ library.  We now do 
[bidirectional calls](https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/2413).  The 
transition to Rust is accelerating!

Other oxidation progress:

- Much of the code around handling `/etc/{passwd,group}` is now in Rust; PR: 
https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/2580

A lot of CI fixes and cleanups; most notably we now test some with 
[AddressSanitizer](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html) which 
caught one bug.

## Bodhi
Here's the [rpm-ostree v2021.2 Bodhi 
update](https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-476111013d)!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-02-18 17:00 UTC)

[James Antill]

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2021-02-18 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.

 Local time information (via. uitime):

= Day: Thursday ==
2021-02-18 09:00 PST  US/Pacific
2021-02-18 12:00 EST  --> US/Eastern <--
2021-02-18 17:00 GMT  Europe/London 
2021-02-18 17:00 UTC  UTC   
2021-02-18 18:00 CET  Europe/Berlin 
2021-02-18 18:00 CET  Europe/Paris  
2021-02-18 22:30 IST  Asia/Calcutta 
 New Day: Friday -
2021-02-19 01:00 HKT  Asia/Hong_Kong
2021-02-19 01:00 +08  Asia/Singapore
2021-02-19 02:00 JST  Asia/Tokyo
2021-02-19 03:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane


 Links to all tickets below can be found at: 

https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open=meeting

= Followup Actions =

#topic #pr-814
 * mhroncok
   talk to authors again, having a working example might help a lot

= Followup Issues =

#topic #907 Which %__foo macros for executables are acceptable? 
.fpc 907
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/907

= Followup Pull Requests =

#topic #pr-814 Add SELinux Independent Policy Guidelines.
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/814

#topic #pr-1045 WIP: Add discussion of macro names beginning with underscores.
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1045

= Open Floor = 

 For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket.  The
report of the agenda items can be found at:

https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open=meeting

 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can:
  * Reply to this e-mail
  * File a new ticket at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee
  * E-mail me directly
  * Bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note
    that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: restic update and src.fedoraproject.org and Self Introduction

[Kevin Anderson]

Thank you! I'm unsure of what I was doing wrong initially but I
appreciate your help in resolving it!

- Kevin Anderson

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 9:17 PM James Cassell
 wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, at 8:06 PM, Kevin Anderson wrote:
> [...]
> > The issue is that when I attempt to push over HTTPS I get an
> > authentication failure. I have tried with an API key as well as with
> > my FAS password using my FAS username (kanderson) for both. Is it
> > expected that I can't push, even to a fork, if I am not a part of a
> > packagers group?
>
> re-clone the repo using `fedpkg clone --anonymous`, then `git remote add fork 
> `, then you can follow the prompts when you attempt to push to 
> your fork. (it'll get you to open a browser and sign-in there)
>
> V/r,
> James Cassell
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Don't update to the latest f33!

[Ed Greshko]

On 18/02/2021 05:11, Steve Dickson wrote:

I agree... ignoring syntax error or parsing error just does not seem
like the appropriate thing to do... Error out! Tell me what is broken
so I can fix it!!


Replace the "," with a " " in the DNS= entry of /etc/systemd/resolved.conf file.

And if you didn't format it that way, find out who did.

And, if you've never made an incorrect format in a configuration file in your 
life, consider yourself
lucky.  The worst ones are formatting failures which occur silently yet things 
don't work.

--
People who believe they don't make mistakes have already made one.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[389-devel] please review: PR 4631 - UI - port monitor charts to PF4 react

[Mark Reynolds]

https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4631

--

389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Office hours so nice, I hold them twice!

[Neal Gompa]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 4:52 PM Ben Cotton  wrote:
>
> Since just after starting as the Fedora Program Manager (FPgM) in
> 2018, I've held weekly office hours. But the time (9 AM US/Eastern)
> isn't convenient for everyone. So starting next week, I've added a
> second version at the end of my work day in order to give a more
> convenient option to a larger part of the community.
>
> Feel free to drop in during either or both of the FPgM office hours
> sessions on Wednesdays in #fedora-meeting-1:
> * 9 AM US Eastern (fedocal:
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9527/)
> * 4 PM US Eastern (fedocal:
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9915/)
>
> The meetings are informal. I drop a few announcement reminders into
> the channel and the rest of the time is open floor to discuss anything
> program management related (elections, changes, schedule, etc).
>

Thank you for doing this! That makes it much easier to be able to
attend one if I want to. :)




--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1929916] New: perl-Log-Any-1.709 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929916

Bug ID: 1929916
   Summary: perl-Log-Any-1.709 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Log-Any
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ticot...@gmail.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, st...@silug.org,
ticot...@gmail.com, xav...@bachelot.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 1.709
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.708-6.fc34
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Log-Any/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6480/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Office hours so nice, I hold them twice!

[Ben Cotton]

Since just after starting as the Fedora Program Manager (FPgM) in
2018, I've held weekly office hours. But the time (9 AM US/Eastern)
isn't convenient for everyone. So starting next week, I've added a
second version at the end of my work day in order to give a more
convenient option to a larger part of the community.

Feel free to drop in during either or both of the FPgM office hours
sessions on Wednesdays in #fedora-meeting-1:
* 9 AM US Eastern (fedocal:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9527/)
* 4 PM US Eastern (fedocal:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9915/)

The meetings are informal. I drop a few announcement reminders into
the channel and the rest of the time is open floor to discuss anything
program management related (elections, changes, schedule, etc).

-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Don't update to the latest f33!

[Steve Dickson]

On 2/16/21 9:03 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 16/02/2021 21:37, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>
>> On 2/15/21 9:16 PM, Dominique Martinet wrote:
>>> Steve Dickson wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:04:52PM -0500:
> I think if no IP was successfully parsed the fallback ought to kick in,
> so it's a systemd-resolved bug -- do you want to report this upstream or
> shall I now I've had a look?
 Fedora bz or an upstream bz? If is the latter where do I report it?
>>> We have systemd devs in fedora so I think either would work out.
>>>
>>> upstream is on github: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues
>>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929212
>>
>> Thanks for the help!
> 
> FWIW, I suppose I don't know why a BZ is needed since the 
> /etc/systemd/resolved.conf has a sample
> for the DNS= parameter showing:
> 
> # Some examples of DNS servers which may be used for DNS= and FallbackDNS=:
> # Cloudflare: 1.1.1.1 1.0.0.1 2606:4700:4700:: 2606:4700:4700::1001
> # Google: 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4 2001:4860:4860:: 2001:4860:4860::884
> 
> And the man page for resolved.conf explicitly states:
> 
>     DNS=
>    A space-separated list of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses to use as system
>    DNS servers.
> 
> Is the expectation that any character which may be considered a delimiter 
> should be acceptable?Who/what was setting DNS=?? It was not me... and 
> obviously it didn't read the man page! :-) 
> Wouldn't the more appropriate course of action be to correct format?
Fail!!! If something is wrong which will cause DNS not to work... Fail!!
Give the Admin a changed to fix the problem... IMHO... 

steved.

> 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Don't update to the latest f33!

[Steve Dickson]

On 2/16/21 9:02 AM, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:02 PM Dominique Martinet  > wrote:
> 
> Michael Catanzaro wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:46:57PM -0600:
> > We removed the fallbacks due to complaints from users who didn't want 
> DNS
> > ever going to Cloudflare or Google. So the lack of fallback is expected 
> and
> > should not be reported as a bug.
> 
> setting DNS= (or DNS="") explicitely should not fallback, I agree with
> that. There are people who want no DNS whatsoever and that should be
> configurable.
> 
> But if extract_first_word() returned a non-empty string and
> manager_add_dns_server_by_string fails (for all iterations of the loop),
> it should definitely kick some fallback in -- the user obviously wanted
> *something*, it just doesn't work.
> 
> 
> Steve's situation provides the perfect example for why a fallback is likely 
> undesirable. It sounds like his
> configuration never worked. There were explicit DNS values configured that 
> weren't being used, yet
> he never noticed because it fell back to something that seemed to work. It 
> would take a deeper and
> deliberate look before the user realized the desired configuration wasn't 
> applied. It is better to error
> than guess in many cases.
I agree... ignoring syntax error or parsing error just does not seem
like the appropriate thing to do... Error out! Tell me what is broken
so I can fix it!!

steved.  
>  
> 
> 
> > I think we have larger issues with DNS server assignment on cloud 
> servers,
> > which I've reported as https://pagure.io/fedora-server/issue/10 
> . But I also
> > notice Steve's case is different, since he really does have some static 
> DNS
> > configuration, just using commas where spaces are required. So seems 
> like a
> > misconfiguration by the cloud provider?
> 
> Not sure where the configuration snippet with comma comes from but yes
> ultimately it's "just" a configuration error.
> Nevertheless, a config that somehow worked until a recent update through
> fallback, I don't think we want more unhappy users :)
> 
> -- 
> Dominique
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> 
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> 
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ 
> 
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines 
> 
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> 
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

[Eugene Syromiatnikov]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 08:14:47PM +0100, Pierre - Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 08:00:49PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 17. 02. 21 19:46, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:02:34AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
> > > > 
> > > > == Summary ==
> > > > 
> > > > This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
> > > > default git branch instead of "master". Specific repositories will be
> > > > manually moved and default git branch for new projects will be set to
> > > > use "main".
> > > 
> > > The way this change has been performad made at least rpms/microcode_ctl
> > > repository unusable[1][2] by koji.
> > > 
> > > [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62174686
> > > [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62174675
> > 
> > The same happens locally:
> > 
> > $ fedpkg clone microcode_ctl
> > Cloning into 'microcode_ctl'...
> > remote: Enumerating objects: 994, done.
> > remote: Counting objects: 100% (994/994), done.
> > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (773/773), done.
> > remote: Total 994 (delta 477), reused 411 (delta 208), pack-reused 0
> > Receiving objects: 100% (994/994), 3.30 MiB | 3.01 MiB/s, done.
> > Resolving deltas: 100% (477/477), done.
> > fatal: cannot process 'refs/remotes/origin/rawhide' and
> > 'refs/remotes/origin/rawhide/user/kyle/amd-ucode-2011-01-11' at the same
> > time
> > Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command.
> 
> Could you try again?
> 
> refs/heads/rawhide/user/kyle/amd-ucode-2011-01-11 has been renamed to
> refs/heads/rawhide_old/user/kyle/amd-ucode-2011-01-11
> that should remove the conflict.

It is working now, thank you!

> 
> Pierre
> 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1929802] perl-Test-Class-0.52 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929802

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Class-0.52-1.fc35
   ||perl-Test-Class-0.52-1.fc34
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |p...@city-fan.org
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Last Closed||2021-02-17 20:16:32



--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth  ---
Rawhide build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62173206

Fedora 34 build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62175515


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1838000] CVE-2020-12723 perl: corruption of intermediate language state of compiled regular expression due to recursive S_study_chunk() calls leads to DoS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838000

Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1929870




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1837988] CVE-2020-10878 perl: corruption of intermediate language state of compiled regular expression due to integer overflow leads to DoS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837988

Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1929868




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1837975] CVE-2020-10543 perl: heap-based buffer overflow in regular expression compiler leads to DoS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837975

Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1929869




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

[Pierre - Yves Chibon]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 08:00:49PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 17. 02. 21 19:46, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:02:34AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
> > > 
> > > == Summary ==
> > > 
> > > This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
> > > default git branch instead of "master". Specific repositories will be
> > > manually moved and default git branch for new projects will be set to
> > > use "main".
> > 
> > The way this change has been performad made at least rpms/microcode_ctl
> > repository unusable[1][2] by koji.
> > 
> > [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62174686
> > [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62174675
> 
> The same happens locally:
> 
> $ fedpkg clone microcode_ctl
> Cloning into 'microcode_ctl'...
> remote: Enumerating objects: 994, done.
> remote: Counting objects: 100% (994/994), done.
> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (773/773), done.
> remote: Total 994 (delta 477), reused 411 (delta 208), pack-reused 0
> Receiving objects: 100% (994/994), 3.30 MiB | 3.01 MiB/s, done.
> Resolving deltas: 100% (477/477), done.
> fatal: cannot process 'refs/remotes/origin/rawhide' and
> 'refs/remotes/origin/rawhide/user/kyle/amd-ucode-2011-01-11' at the same
> time
> Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command.

Could you try again?

refs/heads/rawhide/user/kyle/amd-ucode-2011-01-11 has been renamed to
refs/heads/rawhide_old/user/kyle/amd-ucode-2011-01-11
that should remove the conflict.


Pierre
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

[Miro Hrončok]

On 17. 02. 21 19:46, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:

On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:02:34AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main

== Summary ==

This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
default git branch instead of "master". Specific repositories will be
manually moved and default git branch for new projects will be set to
use "main".


The way this change has been performad made at least rpms/microcode_ctl
repository unusable[1][2] by koji.

[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62174686
[2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62174675


The same happens locally:

$ fedpkg clone microcode_ctl
Cloning into 'microcode_ctl'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 994, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (994/994), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (773/773), done.
remote: Total 994 (delta 477), reused 411 (delta 208), pack-reused 0
Receiving objects: 100% (994/994), 3.30 MiB | 3.01 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (477/477), done.
fatal: cannot process 'refs/remotes/origin/rawhide' and 
'refs/remotes/origin/rawhide/user/kyle/amd-ucode-2011-01-11' at the same time

Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

[Eugene Syromiatnikov]

On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:02:34AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
> default git branch instead of "master". Specific repositories will be
> manually moved and default git branch for new projects will be set to
> use "main".

The way this change has been performad made at least rpms/microcode_ctl
repository unusable[1][2] by koji.

[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62174686
[2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62174675
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1929802] New: perl-Test-Class-0.52 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929802

Bug ID: 1929802
   Summary: perl-Test-Class-0.52 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Test-Class
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, st...@silug.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.52
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.50-19.fc34
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Class/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3387/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1926922] Upgrade perl-Crypt-CBC to 3.01

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926922

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Crypt-CBC-3.01-1.fc35  |perl-Crypt-CBC-3.01-1.fc35
   ||perl-Crypt-CBC-3.01-1.fc34
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2021-02-17 16:12:06



--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth  ---
Built for Fedora 34:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62166729


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2021-02-17)

[David Cantrell]

=
#fedora-meeting-2: FESCO (2021-02-17)
=


Meeting started by dcantrell at 14:59:38 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021-02-17/fesco.2021-02-17-14.59.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---
* init process  (dcantrell, 14:59:41)

* #2508 F34 Change: Route all Audio to PipeWire  (dcantrell, 15:04:28)
  * ACTION: ngompa will add info to the release notes section for
opt-out instructions  (dcantrell, 15:09:29)

* #2576 Fedora 34 incomplete changes  (dcantrell, 15:10:01)

* Next week's chair  (dcantrell, 15:13:25)
  * ACTION: cverna will chair next meeting  (dcantrell, 15:14:06)

* Open Floor  (dcantrell, 15:14:12)

Meeting ended at 15:20:33 UTC.




Action Items

* ngompa will add info to the release notes section for opt-out
  instructions
* cverna will chair next meeting




Action Items, by person
---
* cverna
  * cverna will chair next meeting
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * ngompa will add info to the release notes section for opt-out
instructions




People Present (lines said)
---
* dcantrell (42)
* King_InuYasha (19)
* zodbot (17)
* zbyszek (12)
* bcotton (5)
* decathorpe (3)
* cverna (2)
* mhroncok (1)
* ignatenkobrain (0)
* Conan_Kudo (0)
* Eighth_Doctor (0)
* sgallagh (0)
* nirik (0)
* Sir_Gallantmon (0)
* Son_Goku (0)
* Pharaoh_Atem (0)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

--
David Cantrell 
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: mesa 21.0.0-rc3 making rawhide really unstable?

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 07:35:20 -0600,
 Bruno Wolff III  wrote:


Is their going to be an updated build soon? I tried to build rc4 
(which looks to be what was released), but I need to figure out how to 
get both x86_64 and i686 rpms built when using fedpkg local. If there 
isn't going to be an update for a while, I'll spend time figuring that 
out.


I was able to use scratch-build on the srpm created by fedpkg local in 
order to get i686 rpms for testing. However, I had the same problem, so 
an updated build is unlikely to fix whatever my problem is.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-34-20210217.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Xfce raw-xz armhfp

Failed openQA tests: 23/183 (x86_64), 23/124 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210216.n.1):

ID: 780641  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780641
ID: 780746  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780746
ID: 780748  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
desktop_update_graphical@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780748
ID: 780879  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780879

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-34-20210216.n.1):

ID: 780580  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780580
ID: 780584  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780584
ID: 780591  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780591
ID: 780597  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_repoclosure
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780597
ID: 780600  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780600
ID: 780603  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780603
ID: 780605  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780605
ID: 780617  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780617
ID: 780618  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780618
ID: 780651  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780651
ID: 780689  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780689
ID: 780695  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_role_deploy_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780695
ID: 780697  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_freeipa_replication_master@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780697
ID: 780705  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780705
ID: 780706  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780706
ID: 780708  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_repoclosure@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780708
ID: 780711  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780711
ID: 780713  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_freeipa_replication_replica@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780713
ID: 780714  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780714
ID: 780725  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780725
ID: 780726  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780726
ID: 780727  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_freeipa_replication_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780727
ID: 780761  Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780761
ID: 780772  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780772
ID: 780773  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780773
ID: 780780  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780780
ID: 780781  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780781
ID: 780789  Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780789
ID: 780790  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780790
ID: 780803  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780803
ID: 780808  Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780808
ID: 780833  Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780833
ID: 780840  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780840
ID: 780842  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780842
ID: 780851  Test: aarch64 universal 

Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard - Available for wide use to all packagers

[Vitaly Zaitsev via devel]

On 17.02.2021 10:37, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
We'd like to announce that the Fedora Packager Dashboard passed the 
testing period, was properly deployed inside Fedora Infrastructure, got 
fixes, improvements and feature additions and is now available for 
widespread use among all Fedora Packagers.


Thanks for your work. Fedora Packager Dashboard is a fantastic project. 
I use it every day.


--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: mesa 21.0.0-rc3 making rawhide really unstable?

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 16:17:12 +1000,
 David Airlie  wrote:


Has anyone got a backtrace they could put in a bug? I'm not seeing a
crash with X.org here in my test VMs.


I have only had problems with wine so far. But I use xfce and lightdm and 
they seem to work. I filed bug 1924933 for the wine issue, but the error 
messages didn't look like they would help much.


Is their going to be an updated build soon? I tried to build rc4 (which 
looks to be what was released), but I need to figure out how to get both 
x86_64 and i686 rpms built when using fedpkg local. If there isn't going 
to be an update for a while, I'll spend time figuring that out.


When I want to use wine, I just downgrade to mesa 20 and things work.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1628413] ctstream-29 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628413

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2021-02-17 13:30:10




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1604727] ctstream-28 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1604727

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2021-02-17 13:28:49




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1928507] perl-Tk-804.036 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928507

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Last Closed||2021-02-17 13:03:59




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210217.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-34-20210216.n.1
NEW: Fedora-34-20210217.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   33
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   871.97 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   39.07 KiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  bubblemail-1.3-3.fc34
Old package:  bubblemail-1.3-2.fc34
Summary:  Extensible mail notification service
RPMs: bubblemail
Size: 987.42 KiB
Size change:  340 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Kalev Lember  - 1.3-3
  - Rebuilt for folks soname bump


Package:  converseen-0.9.9.0-1.fc34
Old package:  converseen-0.9.8.1-5.fc34
Summary:  A batch image conversion tool written in C++ with Qt5 and Magick++
RPMs: converseen
Size: 1.50 MiB
Size change:  1.90 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Filipe Rosset  - 0.9.9.0-1
  - Update to 0.9.9.0 fixes rhbz#1929002


Package:  elementary-calendar-5.1.1-4.fc34
Old package:  elementary-calendar-5.1.1-3.fc34
Summary:  Desktop calendar app designed for elementary
RPMs: elementary-calendar elementary-calendar-devel
Size: 2.16 MiB
Size change:  498 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Kalev Lember  - 5.1.1-4
  - Rebuilt for folks soname bump


Package:  folks-1:0.15.2-2.fc34
Old package:  folks-1:0.15.2-1.fc34
Summary:  GObject contact aggregation library
RPMs: folks folks-devel folks-telepathy folks-tools
Size: 4.57 MiB
Size change:  -735.31 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Kalev Lember  - 1:0.15.2-2
  - Drop temporary ABI compat


Package:  geary-3.38.2-2.fc34
Old package:  geary-3.38.2-1.fc34
Summary:  A lightweight email program designed around conversations
RPMs: geary
Size: 14.40 MiB
Size change:  -2.38 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Kalev Lember  - 3.38.2-2
  - Rebuilt for folks soname bump


Package:  gnome-contacts-3.38.1-4.fc34
Old package:  gnome-contacts-3.38.1-3.fc34
Summary:  Contacts manager for GNOME
RPMs: gnome-contacts
Size: 1.91 MiB
Size change:  -4 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Kalev Lember  - 3.38.1-4
  - Rebuilt for folks soname bump


Package:  gnome-maps-3.38.3-3.fc34
Old package:  gnome-maps-3.38.3-2.fc34
Summary:  Map application for GNOME
RPMs: gnome-maps
Size: 3.48 MiB
Size change:  -473 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Kalev Lember  - 3.38.3-3
  - Rebuilt for folks soname bump


Package:  gnome-software-40~beta-1.fc34
Old package:  gnome-software-3.38.1-1.fc34
Summary:  A software center for GNOME
RPMs: gnome-software gnome-software-devel gnome-software-rpm-ostree
Size: 47.19 MiB
Size change:  1.05 MiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Kalev Lember  - 40~beta-1
  - Update to 40.beta


Package:  growlight-1.2.31-2.fc34
Old package:  growlight-1.2.30-2.fc34
Summary:  Disk manipulation and system setup tool
RPMs: growlight
Size: 1.20 MiB
Size change:  918 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Nick Black  - 1.2.31-1
  - New upstream release, fixes terminalless case for growlight-readline


Package:  gxemul-0.6.3-1.fc34
Old package:  gxemul-0.6.2-5.fc34
Summary:  Instruction-level machine emulator
RPMs: gxemul
Size: 28.08 MiB
Size change:  530.86 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Tom Callaway  - 0.6.3-1
  - update to 0.6.3


Package:  kf5-incidenceeditor-20.12.2-3.fc34
Old package:  kf5-incidenceeditor-20.12.2-1.fc34
Summary:  KDE PIM library for creating and editing calendar incidences
RPMs: kf5-incidenceeditor kf5-incidenceeditor-devel
Size: 2.47 MiB
Size change:  1.19 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Rex Dieter  - 20.12.2-2
  - -devel: drop R: cmake(KF5KDGantt2) (#1929227)

  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Rex Dieter  - 20.12.2-3
  - drop BR: cmake(KF5KDGantt2) too (#1929227)


Package:  libedit-3.1-35.20210216cvs.fc34
Old package:  libedit-3.1-34.20191231cvs.fc34
Summary:  The NetBSD Editline library
RPMs: libedit libedit-devel
Size: 874.17 KiB
Size change:  -3.86 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Jerry James  - 3.1-35.20210216cvs
  - New version (20210216-3.1)


Package:  libgexiv2-0.12.1-4.fc34
Old package:  libgexiv2-0.12.1-3.fc33
Summary:  Gexiv2 is a GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library
RPMs: libgexiv2 libgexiv2-devel python3-gexiv2
Size: 789.76 KiB
Size change:  -2.52 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.12.1-4
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild


Package:  libpq-13.2-1.fc34
Old package:  libpq-13.1-3.fc34
Summary:  PostgreSQL client library
RPMs: libpq libpq-devel
Size

Re: Please clarify master vs main vs rawhide branches

[Rafael Fontenelle]

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 3:06 PM Jonathan Wakely
 wrote:
>
> On 05/02/21 10:08 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> >I see that the master to main conversion has happened.  I'd like to know the 
> >recommended way to deal with that.
> >
> >Currently, I'm doing:
> >
> >git fetch --all
> >git remote prune origin
> >git remote set-head origin -a
> >git checkout main
> >
> >The above sets  origin/HEAD to rawhide
> >
> >Question 1: Is that the right set of steps, or is there a better way to 
> >update my local repos?
>
> I think this is all you need:
>
> git fetch -p
> git checkout rawhide
>
> Then optionally:
>
> git branch -d master
>
> >Question 2: For the packages I maintain, should I put changes in main or 
> >rawhide?  Should I keep main and rawhide in sync?
>
> They're automatically in sync. Just commit to rawhide.
>

Should these instructions be documented in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintenance_guide ?  I find
them very useful, and feel they should be documented for current
maintainers. Any thoughts?

Regards,
Rafael Fontenelle
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard - Available for wide use to all packagers

[Dan Čermák]

Iñaki Ucar  writes:

> Thanks for all the great work. The dashboard is fantastic.

Seconded, thanks for your awesome work here, this has really helped me
to keep all the information in one place!


Cheers,

Dan


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1928404] perl-Clipboard-0.27 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928404

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Last Closed||2021-02-17 12:06:55




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Fedora Packager Dashboard - Available for wide use to all packagers

[Iñaki Ucar]

Thanks for all the great work. The dashboard is fantastic.

Iñaki

On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 12:46, Frantisek Zatloukal  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We'd like to announce that the Fedora Packager Dashboard passed the testing 
> period, was properly deployed inside Fedora Infrastructure, got fixes, 
> improvements and feature additions and is now available for widespread use 
> among all Fedora Packagers.
>
>
> For those of you who didn’t hear about the Dashboard yet, It combines all 
> relevant information for package maintainers into one web application with 
> searching and both simple and advanced (regex based) filtering possibilities. 
> You’ll find things like open bug reports, updates, overrides, FTBFS (from 
> koschei and from Fedora Health Check by decathorpe) and FTI reports, pull 
> requests and orphan/retire warnings not only for your packages directly, but 
> even for packages you depend on. It’s designed to make a packager's life 
> easier and save our packagers some of their time. An article showing it’s 
> current features is available on Fedora Community Blog: 
> https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fedora-packager-dashboard/ . There 
> will also be a talk about the Dashboard on DevConf.cz 2021: 
> https://devconfcz2021.sched.com/event/gmLm/packager-dashboard-life-of-packager-made-easy
>  .
>
>
> Dashboard itself is available: https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
>
> (the Dashboard is automatically pulling new data every 15 minutes, so you can 
> just leave it open in one of your browser tabs and don’t worry about 
> reloading it :) )
>
>
> Fedora Packager Dashboard leverages caching in the Oraculum backend to 
> significantly speed-up loading times with comparison to querying all the 
> relevant resources separately. We, of course, can't cache the entire 
> Bugzilla, Pagure, Bodhi... so we only cache data for users who
>
> visit Packager Dashboard at least once per 14 days. Please keep in mind that 
> the first load for a “new” user might take a while. Most of the data sources 
> are refreshed every hour.
>
>
> You can use the Dashboard for individual accounts as well as for FAS groups.
>
>
> While the testing period is behind us and we have everything properly 
> deployed, the work doesn’t end here. We have longer term plans for even more 
> stuff for the dashboard. On the top of our list currently sit support for 
> private bugs (visible after you authenticate with FAS), and contextual 
> schedules and calendars for packages you might be interested in (eg. Do you 
> maintain some Python packages? You might want to have a Python Release 
> Calendar on your dashboard.)
>
>
> Feel free to provide ideas or bug reports at 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/packager_dashboard or simply send an email reply 
> to this thread with all kinds of feedback.
>
> ___
> devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



-- 
Iñaki Úcar
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1853802] font selection is broken on perl-Tk-804.035-1.fc32.x86_64

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853802

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|33  |rawhide




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1803711] perl-Tk-804.034-9.fc33 FTBFS: t/entry.t test fails

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803711

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|34  |rawhide




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-IoT-35-20210217.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210216.0):

ID: 780541  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780541
ID: 780543  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780543
ID: 780550  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780550
ID: 780557  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780557
ID: 780558  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780558

Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 26 of 31
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1929646] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.60 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929646

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|ppi...@redhat.com   |
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora Packager Dashboard - Available for wide use to all packagers

[Frantisek Zatloukal]

Hi,

We'd like to announce that the Fedora Packager Dashboard passed the testing
period, was properly deployed inside Fedora Infrastructure, got fixes,
improvements and feature additions and is now available for widespread use
among all Fedora Packagers.

For those of you who didn’t hear about the Dashboard yet, It combines all
relevant information for package maintainers into one web application with
searching and both simple and advanced (regex based) filtering
possibilities. You’ll find things like open bug reports, updates,
overrides, FTBFS (from koschei and from Fedora Health Check by decathorpe)
and FTI reports, pull requests and orphan/retire warnings not only for your
packages directly, but even for packages you depend on. It’s designed to
make a packager's life easier and save our packagers some of their time. An
article showing it’s current features is available on Fedora Community
Blog: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fedora-packager-dashboard/
. There
will also be a talk about the Dashboard on DevConf.cz 2021:
https://devconfcz2021.sched.com/event/gmLm/packager-dashboard-life-of-packager-made-easy
.

Dashboard itself is available: https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/

(the Dashboard is automatically pulling new data every 15 minutes, so you
can just leave it open in one of your browser tabs and don’t worry about
reloading it :) )

Fedora Packager Dashboard leverages caching in the Oraculum backend to
significantly speed-up loading times with comparison to querying all the
relevant resources separately. We, of course, can't cache the entire
Bugzilla, Pagure, Bodhi... so we only cache data for users who

visit Packager Dashboard at least once per 14 days. Please keep in mind
that the first load for a “new” user might take a while. Most of the data
sources are refreshed every hour.

You can use the Dashboard for individual accounts as well as for FAS groups.

While the testing period is behind us and we have everything properly
deployed, the work doesn’t end here. We have longer term plans for even
more stuff for the dashboard. On the top of our list currently sit support
for private bugs (visible after you authenticate with FAS), and contextual
schedules and calendars for packages you might be interested in (eg. Do you
maintain some Python packages? You might want to have a Python Release
Calendar on your dashboard.)

Feel free to provide ideas or bug reports at
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/packager_dashboard or simply send an email
reply to this thread with all kinds of feedback.
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora Packager Dashboard - Available for wide use to all packagers

[Frantisek Zatloukal]

Hi,

We'd like to announce that the Fedora Packager Dashboard passed the testing
period, was properly deployed inside Fedora Infrastructure, got fixes,
improvements and feature additions and is now available for widespread use
among all Fedora Packagers.

For those of you who didn’t hear about the Dashboard yet, It combines all
relevant information for package maintainers into one web application with
searching and both simple and advanced (regex based) filtering
possibilities. You’ll find things like open bug reports, updates,
overrides, FTBFS (from koschei and from Fedora Health Check by decathorpe)
and FTI reports, pull requests and orphan/retire warnings not only for your
packages directly, but even for packages you depend on. It’s designed to
make a packager's life easier and save our packagers some of their time. An
article showing it’s current features is available on Fedora Community
Blog: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fedora-packager-dashboard/
. There
will also be a talk about the Dashboard on DevConf.cz 2021:
https://devconfcz2021.sched.com/event/gmLm/packager-dashboard-life-of-packager-made-easy
.

Dashboard itself is available: https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/

(the Dashboard is automatically pulling new data every 15 minutes, so you
can just leave it open in one of your browser tabs and don’t worry about
reloading it :) )

Fedora Packager Dashboard leverages caching in the Oraculum backend to
significantly speed-up loading times with comparison to querying all the
relevant resources separately. We, of course, can't cache the entire
Bugzilla, Pagure, Bodhi... so we only cache data for users who

visit Packager Dashboard at least once per 14 days. Please keep in mind
that the first load for a “new” user might take a while. Most of the data
sources are refreshed every hour.

You can use the Dashboard for individual accounts as well as for FAS groups.

While the testing period is behind us and we have everything properly
deployed, the work doesn’t end here. We have longer term plans for even
more stuff for the dashboard. On the top of our list currently sit support
for private bugs (visible after you authenticate with FAS), and contextual
schedules and calendars for packages you might be interested in (eg. Do you
maintain some Python packages? You might want to have a Python Release
Calendar on your dashboard.)

Feel free to provide ideas or bug reports at
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/packager_dashboard or simply send an email
reply to this thread with all kinds of feedback.
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1929646] New: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.60 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929646

Bug ID: 1929646
   Summary: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.60 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 7.60
Current version/release in rawhide: 7.58-2.fc34
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/ExtUtils-MakeMaker/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2867/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Rawhide-20210217.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Xfce raw-xz armhfp

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
8 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 31/183 (x86_64), 19/124 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210216.n.1):

ID: 780214  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780214
ID: 780215  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_role_deploy_domain_controller **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780215
ID: 780219  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_database_client **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780219
ID: 780234  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780234
ID: 780236  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780236
ID: 780248  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780248
ID: 780321  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780321
ID: 780348  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780348
ID: 780356  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780356
ID: 780377  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780377
ID: 780466  Test: aarch64 universal install_package_set_minimal@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780466

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210216.n.1):

ID: 780228  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_repoclosure
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780228
ID: 780229  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780229
ID: 780275  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780275
ID: 780282  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780282
ID: 780283  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780283
ID: 780285  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780285
ID: 780286  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_printing
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780286
ID: 780288  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780288
ID: 780336  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780336
ID: 780337  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780337
ID: 780339  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_repoclosure@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780339
ID: 780340  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780340
ID: 780392  Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780392
ID: 780396  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780396
ID: 780397  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780397
ID: 780398  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780398
ID: 780399  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780399
ID: 780403  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780403
ID: 780404  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780404
ID: 780405  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780405
ID: 780411  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780411
ID: 780412  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780412
ID: 780420  Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780420
ID: 780421  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780421
ID: 780434  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780434
ID: 780439  Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780439
ID: 780460  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: 

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210217.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210216.0):

ID: 780516  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780516
ID: 780523  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/780523

Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210217.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210216.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210217.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  1
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:12
Upgraded packages:   47
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:20.95 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   1.11 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   2.71 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: KDE_Appliance raw-xz armhfp
Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-KDE-armhfp-Rawhide-20210216.n.1-sda.raw.xz

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: csync2-1.34-28.fc34
Summary: Cluster synchronization tool
RPMs:csync2
Size:772.77 KiB

Package: ghc-attempt-0.4.0.1-18.fc34
Summary: Concrete data type for handling extensible exceptions as failures
RPMs:ghc-attempt ghc-attempt-devel ghc-attempt-doc ghc-attempt-prof
Size:427.21 KiB

Package: ghc-failure-0.2.0.3-18.fc34
Summary: A simple type class for success/failure computations
RPMs:ghc-failure ghc-failure-devel ghc-failure-doc ghc-failure-prof
Size:250.03 KiB

Package: nim-1.0.4-4.fc34
Summary: Statically typed, imperative programming language
RPMs:nim nim-doc nim-tools
Size:4.92 MiB

Package: node-0.3.2-29.fc34
Summary: Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and 
G8BPQ nodes
RPMs:node
Size:341.88 KiB

Package: python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-13.fc34
Summary: jquery-ui (XStatic packaging standard)
RPMs:python3-XStatic-jquery-ui xstatic-jquery-ui-common
Size:595.96 KiB

Package: python-couchbase-2.5.5-8.fc33
Summary: Python client for Couchbase server
RPMs:python-couchbase-doc python3-couchbase
Size:3.00 MiB

Package: python-django-helpdesk-0.2.22-3.fc34
Summary: Django-powered ticket tracker for your helpdesk
RPMs:python3-django-helpdesk
Size:2.09 MiB

Package: python-requests-credssp-1.0.0-10.fc34
Summary: This package allows for HTTPS CredSSP authentication using the 
requests library.
RPMs:python3-requests-credssp
Size:38.86 KiB

Package: storhaug-1.0-7.fc34
Summary: High-Availability Add-on for NFS-Ganesha
RPMs:storhaug storhaug-nfs
Size:27.24 KiB

Package: tmw-20130201-15.fc34
Summary: The Mana World is a 2D MMORPG
RPMs:tmw
Size:976.21 KiB

Package: uw-imap-2007f-27.fc34
Summary: UW Server daemons for IMAP and POP network mail protocols
RPMs:libc-client uw-imap uw-imap-devel uw-imap-static uw-imap-utils
Size:7.59 MiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  avahi-0.8-9.fc35
Old package:  avahi-0.8-6.fc34
Summary:  Local network service discovery
RPMs: avahi avahi-autoipd avahi-compat-howl avahi-compat-howl-devel 
avahi-compat-libdns_sd avahi-compat-libdns_sd-devel avahi-devel avahi-dnsconfd 
avahi-glib avahi-glib-devel avahi-gobject avahi-gobject-devel avahi-libs 
avahi-qt3 avahi-qt3-devel avahi-qt4 avahi-qt4-devel avahi-qt5 avahi-qt5-devel 
avahi-sharp avahi-tools avahi-ui avahi-ui-devel avahi-ui-gtk3 avahi-ui-sharp 
avahi-ui-sharp-devel avahi-ui-tools
Size: 4.91 MiB
Size change:  77.95 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Nov 17 2020 Rex Dieter  - 0.8-7
  - fix undefined symbols in libavahi-qt3 (#1897925)

  * Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.8-8
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild

  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Rex Dieter  - 0.8-9
  - cleanup/fix conditionals (#1751484)
  - disable lto, workaround FTBFS (#1907727)


Package:  bubblemail-1.3-3.fc35
Old package:  bubblemail-1.3-2.fc34
Summary:  Extensible mail notification service
RPMs: bubblemail
Size: 987.44 KiB
Size change:  359 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Kalev Lember  - 1.3-3
  - Rebuilt for folks soname bump


Package:  calls-0.3.1-1.fc35
Old package:  calls-0.3.0-1.fc35
Summary:  A phone dialer and call handler
RPMs: calls
Size: 695.00 KiB
Size change:  336 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Torrey Sorensen  - 0.3.1-1
  - Update version 0.3.1


Package:  container-selinux-2:2.158.0-4.dev.gite78ac4f.fc35
Old package:  container-selinux-2:2.158.0-3.dev.gitaeb85c4.fc35
Summary:  SELinux policies for container runtimes
RPMs: container-selinux
Size: 49.34 KiB
Size change:  -75 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 RH Container Bot  - 
2:2.158.0-4.dev.gite78ac4f
  - autobuilt e78ac4f


Package:  converseen-0.9.9.0-1.fc35
Old package:  converseen-0.9.8.1-5.fc34
Summary:  A batch image conversion tool written in C++ with Qt5 and Magick++
RPMs: converseen
Size: 1.50 MiB
Size change:  1.38 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 16 2021 Filipe Rosset  - 0.9.9.0-1
  - Update to 0.9.9.0 fixes rhbz#1929002


Package:  dolphin-emu-5.0.13603-2.fc35
Old package:  dolphin-emu-5.0.13603-1.fc35
Summary:  GameCube / Wii / Triforce Emulator
RPMs: dolphin-emu dolphin-emu-data dolphin-emu-nogui
Size: 23.60 MiB

Upgrades to Fedora 34

[Miroslav Suchý]

I want to thank you. You are great!

We branched just last week and when I tried the upgrade to Fedora 34 I got just 4 issues. One of them is from RpmFusion 
and these three remaining are either already fixed or being worked on.


I have been a Fedorian for a long time, but I never seen so clean upgrade so 
early after the branching.

Thank everyone involved!
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Associate Manager, Community Packaging Tools, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure