Re: Second call for rebuilding powerdevil and call for help from provenpackagers
On Saturday, 28 October 2023 11:59:55 CEST Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > > * f40-build-side-76474 > > * f39-build-side-76476 > > * f38-build-side-76478 > > > > > I will take care of this today (2023-10-28) Powerdevil has been rebuilt on the aforementioned sidetags ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Second call for rebuilding powerdevil and call for help from provenpackagers
On Thursday, 26 October 2023 22:57:28 CEST Qiyu Yan wrote: > Hi all, > > It is nearly a full month since last mail. And seems that koji has > recycled the side tags due to inactivity. I re-created them: > > * f40-build-side-76474 > * f39-build-side-76476 > * f38-build-side-76478 > > Seems that I don't have the permission to push to powerdevil and rebuild > it so maybe any provenpackagers can help? > > Cheers, > Qiyu > > 在 2023/9/29 14:04, Qiyu Yan 写道: > > Hi all, > > > > I am planning to update package ddcutil to latest upstream release > > 2.0.0. This will introduce a soname bump for libddcutil.so from > > libddcutil.4 to libddcutil.5. I checked that the only affected package > > due to this update will be powerdevil. > > > > dnf repoquery --whatrequires "libddcutil.so.4()(64bit)" --release=40 > > ... > > powerdevil-0:5.27.8-1.fc40.x86_64 > > > > I have built ddcutil in following side-tags: > > > > * f38-build-side-74742 > > * f39-build-side-74740 > > * f40-build-side-74738 > > > > If possible, please built powerdevil in those side-tags that we can > > push the update together. > > > > Cheers, > > Qiyu I will take care of this today (2023-10-28) Best regards, Marc Deop ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Second call for rebuilding powerdevil and call for help from provenpackagers
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 4:57 PM Qiyu Yan wrote: > > Hi all, > > It is nearly a full month since last mail. And seems that koji has recycled > the side tags due to inactivity. I re-created them: > > f40-build-side-76474 > f39-build-side-76476 > f38-build-side-76478 > > Seems that I don't have the permission to push to powerdevil and rebuild it > so maybe any provenpackagers can help? > > Cheers, > Qiyu > > 在 2023/9/29 14:04, Qiyu Yan 写道: > > Hi all, > > I am planning to update package ddcutil to latest upstream release 2.0.0. > This will introduce a soname bump for libddcutil.so from libddcutil.4 to > libddcutil.5. I checked that the only affected package due to this update > will be powerdevil. > > dnf repoquery --whatrequires "libddcutil.so.4()(64bit)" --release=40 > ... > powerdevil-0:5.27.8-1.fc40.x86_64 > > I have built ddcutil in following side-tags: > > * f38-build-side-74742 > * f39-build-side-74740 > * f40-build-side-74738 > > If possible, please built powerdevil in those side-tags that we can push the > update together. > It seems this was going into my spam folder. I've CC'd Marc and Steve who are working on updating Plasma now. They should be able to coordinate with you. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Second call for rebuilding powerdevil and call for help from provenpackagers
Hi all, It is nearly a full month since last mail. And seems that koji has recycled the side tags due to inactivity. I re-created them: * f40-build-side-76474 * f39-build-side-76476 * f38-build-side-76478 Seems that I don't have the permission to push to powerdevil and rebuild it so maybe any provenpackagers can help? Cheers, Qiyu 在 2023/9/29 14:04, Qiyu Yan 写道: Hi all, I am planning to update package ddcutil to latest upstream release 2.0.0. This will introduce a soname bump for libddcutil.so from libddcutil.4 to libddcutil.5. I checked that the only affected package due to this update will be powerdevil. dnf repoquery --whatrequires "libddcutil.so.4()(64bit)" --release=40 ... powerdevil-0:5.27.8-1.fc40.x86_64 I have built ddcutil in following side-tags: * f38-build-side-74742 * f39-build-side-74740 * f40-build-side-74738 If possible, please built powerdevil in those side-tags that we can push the update together. Cheers, Qiyu ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
