[OpenSER-Devel] SF.net SVN: openser: [3748] trunk
Revision: 3748 http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=3748view=rev Author: bogdan_iancu Date: 2008-02-25 02:51:21 -0800 (Mon, 25 Feb 2008) Log Message: --- - added new script core command - ususe_blacklist(list), pair with use_blacklist(list) - functions [un]use_blacklist() may take as parameter the keyword all - the acction applies on all blacklists Modified Paths: -- trunk/action.c trunk/blacklists.c trunk/blacklists.h trunk/cfg.lex trunk/cfg.y trunk/route.c trunk/route_struct.h This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSER-Devel] [OpenSER-Users] mediaproxy server NEW FEATURE!!!
Jens, yes, if an attacker guess/sniff the SSRC then could take over the rtp session. A timeout would work fine but right now I don't have the time to do it, if somebody else wants to do it I can send the source code. Regards, Gonzalo. Gonzalo J. Sambucaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] 1) When the first rtp packet of a source arrives, save the SSRC field in the MP. - Save the SSRC of the caller. - Save the SSRC of the called. 2) If arrives a rtp packet with unknown source IP but with the same SSRC field of some of the two streams, updates the binding (with the new IP detected) between the caller and the MP or between the called and the MP according to the field SSRC previously saved. An attacker would have to guess/sniff the SSRC and then could take over the rtp session? (maybe could be fixed by only allowing to take over after some timeout) On the other hand if he can sniff ... ___ Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users -- Gonzalo J. Sambucaro Ingeniería de Software Tel: +54-341-4230504 MSLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.mslc.com.ar Ocampo y Esmeralda - Vivero de Empresas de Base Tecnológica Ciudad Universitaria Rosario UNR, CCT CONICET Rosario - Santa Fé - Argentina ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
[OpenSER-Devel] SF.net SVN: openser: [3751] trunk/tls/tls_server.c
Revision: 3751 http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=3751view=rev Author: bogdan_iancu Date: 2008-02-25 04:30:33 -0800 (Mon, 25 Feb 2008) Log Message: --- -print more info in case of error Modified Paths: -- trunk/tls/tls_server.c This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSER-Devel] irc on domains for rr module
Hi Juha, The idea was to have all modules using a core function (like rr does now) to check is a domain is local IP or domain, instead of having each module to use a core function and a function from other module (domains).. Regards, Bogdan Juha Heinanen wrote: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes: 2) technically simple, but solves only the particular case of RR module; and there will be no common way to check from script/other modules if some domain is local or not. bogdan, i don't understand. the api that domain module provides for other modules IS a common way to check from other modules if some domain is local or not. -- juha ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
[OpenSER-Devel] [ openser-Bugs-1901434 ] 6xx reply handling
Bugs item #1901434, was opened at 2008-02-25 17:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=743020aid=1901434group_id=139143 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: ver 1.3.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Assigned to: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Summary: 6xx reply handling Initial Comment: I found two bugs in 6xx reply handing in TM: 1) according to RFC3261, no branch should be added after a 6xx reply (no more serial forking): Chapter 6 Definitions: Sequential Search: In a sequential search, a proxy server attempts each contact address in sequence, proceeding to the next one only after the previous has generated a final response. A 2xx or 6xx class final response always terminates a sequential search. 16.7 Response Processing (Point 5) If a 6xx response is received, it is not immediately forwarded,but the stateful proxy SHOULD cancel all client pending transactions as described in Section 10, and it MUST NOT create any new branches in this context. 2) ignoring bug 1), if after a 6xx reply, a new branch is added in failure route or callback, the pending branches (from the same set with 6xx reply) are not cancelled any more. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=743020aid=1901434group_id=139143 ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
[OpenSER-Devel] [ openser-Bugs-1887999 ] memory leak in canceled call with diversion header
Bugs item #1887999, was opened at 2008-02-06 18:12 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by bogdan_iancu You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=743020aid=1887999group_id=139143 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: core Group: ver 1.2.x Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Will Quan (will_quan) Assigned to: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Summary: memory leak in canceled call with diversionheader Initial Comment: [Scripts attached to reproduce the issue.] I think the issue is with ACC log_extra setting: modparam(acc, log_extra, div=$di) The acc callback 'on_missed' is invoked when the call is canceled (487). With this 'log_extra' setting, the acc function extra2strar() executes and parses the diversion header in the request. It is this memory that is not freed (msg-diversion-parsed). -- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-02-25 17:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Closed - keep 1879864 for reporting. -- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-02-11 18:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Hi Will, A fix is available on SVN trunk - please update and test again to see if the problem was fixed. I need your confirmation before doing a backport to 1.3 and 1.2 Thanks and regards, Bogdan -- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-02-07 13:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Hi will, Fortunately (strange to say this :D) a crash was reported due the same cause. More or less it confirmed my suppositions on this matter, so things are clear now. I will prepare a general solution in TM module. Regards, Bogdan -- Comment By: Will Quan (will_quan) Date: 2008-02-06 20:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1850067 Originator: YES Hi bogdan, No core dump. I may have been running slow enough to where the calls were single-handled on the same process. I hacked a fix that frees the memory back in acc extra2strar, after the ACC log is generated. However, I do not have a general solution :( --will -- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-02-06 19:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Hi Will, I went through the debug output you had in the email - very useful. Take a look at the following output: Jan 31 16:12:05 www /openser[64400]: DBG: trans=0x4849523c, callback type 128, id 1 entered Jan 31 16:12:05 www /openser[64400]: qm_malloc(0x8151120, 212) called from parser/parse_diversion.c: parse_diversion_header(54) Jan 31 16:12:05 www /openser[64400]: qm_malloc(0x8151120, 212) returns address 0x81ab378 frag. 0x81ab360 (size=388) on 1 -th hit Jan 31 16:12:05 www /openser[64400]: qm_malloc(0x8151120, 24) called from parser/parse_to.c: parse_to_param(278) Jan 31 16:12:05 www /openser[64400]: qm_malloc(0x8151120, 24) returns address 0x81a9788 frag. 0x81a9770 (size=32) on 1 -th hit From TM, the callback type 128 is triggered - note this is TMCB_RESPONSE_OUT and not TMCB_ON_FAILURE as you thought. The TMCB_RESPONSE_OUT gets as param both the request (in shm mem) and the reply. In acc module (which installs the callback) parse the request (from shm) looking for some hdrs (due pseudo vars). So, the newly parsed header body exists in private mem (0x81ab378 and 0x81a9788) and it is attached to the request which resides in shm memory. This is why the 0x81ab378 and 0x81a9788 chunks are not freed when the processing of the reply is done - because they are attached to the request, in shm memory. The req from shm is freed when the transaction is completed - don't you get a core dump when this happens - as the chunks from private memory (potential from other process) are freed as shm memory ? Regards, Bogdan -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=743020aid=1887999group_id=139143 ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSER-Devel] more presence errors
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Juha Heinanen wrote: in addition to the crash, i also noticed this: Feb 23 08:53:53 rautu /usr/sbin/openser[23344]: LOG: Handling PUBLISH to sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Feb 23 08:53:53 rautu /usr/sbin/openser[23344]: ERROR:db_mysql:db_mysql_submit_query: driver error on query: Commands out of sync; you can't run this command now Feb 23 08:53:53 rautu /usr/sbin/openser[23344]: ERROR:core:db_do_insert: error while submitting query Feb 23 08:53:53 rautu /usr/sbin/openser[23344]: ERROR:presence:update_presentity: inserting new record in database Feb 23 08:53:53 rautu /usr/sbin/openser[23344]: ERROR:presence:handle_publish: when updating presentity Feb 23 08:53:53 rautu /usr/sbin/openser[23344]: ERROR: PUBLISH to sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] failed all these presence problems appeared when i upgraded trunk to latest version. before that the same presence stuff has worked fine for a long time. Hi Juha, i've noticed that both traces have a database error in the logs. Perhaps this was caused from my recent reworks.. Or perhaps there exists an issue with the presence module if a database query fails? I have no test setup for this modules ready, so unfortunally i can't test this, but i'll keep an eye on the db problems.. Cheers, Henning ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
[OpenSER-Devel] [ openser-Bugs-1879864 ] openser crash while handling 487 response
Bugs item #1879864, was opened at 2008-01-25 19:01 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by bogdan_iancu You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=743020aid=1879864group_id=139143 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: ver 1.3.x Status: Open Resolution: Fixed Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Ovidiu Sas (osas) Assigned to: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Summary: openser crash while handling 487 response Initial Comment: If I enable extra acc in openser while doing syslog accounting, openser is crashing while handling 487 message. The following extra acc params is crashing the server: modparam(acc, log_extra, r_uri=$ru;from=$fn;from_uri=$fu;to=$tn;to_uri=$tu;contact=$ct;ua=$hdr(User-Agent);src_ip=$si;src_port=$sp;rpid=$re ) Here are the relevant informations: # openser -V version: openser 1.3.0-notls (i386/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. svnrevision: 2:3580M @(#) $Id: main.c 3565 2008-01-23 17:17:29Z miconda $ main.c compiled on 23:23:01 Jan 24 2008 with gcc 4.1.2 Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/openser -P /var/run/openser.pid -m 512'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x080efa69 in free_to () (gdb) bt #0 0x080efa69 in free_to () #1 0x080daa30 in clean_hdr_field () #2 0x0014fd4a in t_should_relay_response (Trans=0x9b965678, new_code=487, branch=0, should_store=0xbfdb1cf4, should_relay=0xbfdb1cf8, cancel_bitmap=0xbfdb1dd0, reply=0x8195c70) at t_reply.c:545 #3 0x00150a94 in relay_reply (t=0x9b965678, p_msg=0x8195c70, branch=0, msg_status=487, cancel_bitmap=0xbfdb1dd0) at t_reply.c:1051 #4 0x00151fcb in reply_received (p_msg=0x8195c70) at t_reply.c:1403 #5 0x08063c50 in forward_reply () #6 0x080940e2 in receive_msg () #7 0x080d3c87 in udp_rcv_loop () #8 0x0806c396 in main () Regards, Ovidiu Sas -- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-02-25 17:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Based on some reports from Ovidiu, it looks like there are some side effects (crashes) that might be related to this fixstill to investigate -- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-02-11 18:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Hi Ovidiu, A fix is available on SVN trunk - please update and test again to see if the problem was fixed. I need your confirmation before doing a backport to 1.3 and 1.2 Thanks and regards, Bogdan -- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-02-07 13:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Hi Ovidiu, Thanks for the core file - it was really helpful. I spent some time digging into it and I found the bug. Shortly, it is the same reported by Will (id #1887999). He reported as mem leak, but as suspected, it can be also a crash (as in your case). The problem was the $re from extra_acc - RPID header - this pseudo variable was triggering the parsing (with parse_to() ) of the RPID header in TMCB_RESPONSE_OUT handler of acc. The parsed hdr was in the private memory of a process receiving the first reply that required acc. The parsed hdr remained attached to the transaction (in shm mem) and the TMCB_ON_FAILURE tried to free it in a different process. The result is known :). I will prepare asap a fix for this problem. Regards, Bogdan -- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-01-29 10:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Ovidiu, could you provide the core file and the binaries? I would like to inspect a bit the core. Thanks and regards, Bogdan -- Comment By: Ovidiu Sas (osas) Date: 2008-01-28 23:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1395524 Originator: YES The server seems to be working fine with the following log_extra params: modparam(acc, log_extra, from_uri=$fu;r_uri=$ru ) I will try tomorrow to play more with To and report back. Henning, in my openser config I'm using only cr_tree_rewrite_uri(). -- Comment By: Henning Westerholt (henningw) Date: 2008-01-28 18:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=337916 Originator: NO Not sure if this is related.. Ovidiu, you're seeing this crash with the cr
[OpenSER-Devel] [ openser-Bugs-1879864 ] openser crash when extra acc params enabled
Bugs item #1879864, was opened at 2008-01-25 12:01 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by osas You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=743020aid=1879864group_id=139143 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: ver 1.3.x Status: Open Resolution: Fixed Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Ovidiu Sas (osas) Assigned to: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Summary: openser crash when extra acc params enabled Initial Comment: If I enable extra acc in openser while doing syslog accounting, openser is crashing while handling 487 message. The following extra acc params is crashing the server: modparam(acc, log_extra, r_uri=$ru;from=$fn;from_uri=$fu;to=$tn;to_uri=$tu;contact=$ct;ua=$hdr(User-Agent);src_ip=$si;src_port=$sp;rpid=$re ) Here are the relevant informations: # openser -V version: openser 1.3.0-notls (i386/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. svnrevision: 2:3580M @(#) $Id: main.c 3565 2008-01-23 17:17:29Z miconda $ main.c compiled on 23:23:01 Jan 24 2008 with gcc 4.1.2 Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/openser -P /var/run/openser.pid -m 512'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x080efa69 in free_to () (gdb) bt #0 0x080efa69 in free_to () #1 0x080daa30 in clean_hdr_field () #2 0x0014fd4a in t_should_relay_response (Trans=0x9b965678, new_code=487, branch=0, should_store=0xbfdb1cf4, should_relay=0xbfdb1cf8, cancel_bitmap=0xbfdb1dd0, reply=0x8195c70) at t_reply.c:545 #3 0x00150a94 in relay_reply (t=0x9b965678, p_msg=0x8195c70, branch=0, msg_status=487, cancel_bitmap=0xbfdb1dd0) at t_reply.c:1051 #4 0x00151fcb in reply_received (p_msg=0x8195c70) at t_reply.c:1403 #5 0x08063c50 in forward_reply () #6 0x080940e2 in receive_msg () #7 0x080d3c87 in udp_rcv_loop () #8 0x0806c396 in main () Regards, Ovidiu Sas -- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-02-25 10:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Based on some reports from Ovidiu, it looks like there are some side effects (crashes) that might be related to this fixstill to investigate -- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-02-11 11:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Hi Ovidiu, A fix is available on SVN trunk - please update and test again to see if the problem was fixed. I need your confirmation before doing a backport to 1.3 and 1.2 Thanks and regards, Bogdan -- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-02-07 06:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Hi Ovidiu, Thanks for the core file - it was really helpful. I spent some time digging into it and I found the bug. Shortly, it is the same reported by Will (id #1887999). He reported as mem leak, but as suspected, it can be also a crash (as in your case). The problem was the $re from extra_acc - RPID header - this pseudo variable was triggering the parsing (with parse_to() ) of the RPID header in TMCB_RESPONSE_OUT handler of acc. The parsed hdr was in the private memory of a process receiving the first reply that required acc. The parsed hdr remained attached to the transaction (in shm mem) and the TMCB_ON_FAILURE tried to free it in a different process. The result is known :). I will prepare asap a fix for this problem. Regards, Bogdan -- Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu) Date: 2008-01-29 03:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1275325 Originator: NO Ovidiu, could you provide the core file and the binaries? I would like to inspect a bit the core. Thanks and regards, Bogdan -- Comment By: Ovidiu Sas (osas) Date: 2008-01-28 16:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1395524 Originator: YES The server seems to be working fine with the following log_extra params: modparam(acc, log_extra, from_uri=$fu;r_uri=$ru ) I will try tomorrow to play more with To and report back. Henning, in my openser config I'm using only cr_tree_rewrite_uri(). -- Comment By: Henning Westerholt (henningw) Date: 2008-01-28 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=337916 Originator: NO Not sure if this is related.. Ovidiu, you're seeing this crash with the cr
[OpenSER-Devel] SF.net SVN: openser: [3756] trunk/modules/pua_bla/pua_bla.c
Revision: 3756 http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=3756view=rev Author: anca_vamanu Date: 2008-02-25 09:22:11 -0800 (Mon, 25 Feb 2008) Log Message: --- - fixed error message Modified Paths: -- trunk/modules/pua_bla/pua_bla.c This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
[OpenSER-Devel] SF.net SVN: openser: [3757] branches/1.3/modules/pua_bla/pua_bla.c
Revision: 3757 http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=3757view=rev Author: anca_vamanu Date: 2008-02-25 09:23:39 -0800 (Mon, 25 Feb 2008) Log Message: --- - fixed error message Modified Paths: -- branches/1.3/modules/pua_bla/pua_bla.c This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSER-Devel] more presence errors
On Monday 25 February 2008, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Hi, if it helps, usually the Commands out of sync error is generated when the more than one queries are pushed on the same mysql connection . To be more precise, if you issue a new query before you finish with and free the previous result set. -- Dan ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSER-Devel] return argument
Hello,
On 02/25/08 08:34, Juha Heinanen wrote:
i remember that someone asked a while ago, if return statement accepts a
pseudo variable argument.
looks like it still doesn't because something like this resulted in
syntax error at return line:
route[1] {
route(2);
return($retcode);
}
i solved the problem like this:
route[1] {
route(2);
switch($retcode) {
case 1:
return(1);
case 2:
return(2);
default:
return(-1);
}
}
which is not pretty. if i didn't make a mistake in above and return
statement does not accept a pv argument, i would like to put this
feature on 1.4 wish list.
no, it is not implemented yet, but I had it in mind for some time -- I
remember also some discussion about. Please add to the tracker not to
forget about it again, until next release.
Cheers,
Daniel
-- juha
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSER-Devel] irc on domains for rr module
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes: The idea was to have all modules using a core function (like rr does now) to check is a domain is local IP or domain, instead of having each module to use a core function and a function from other module (domains)... in that case, domain module should also push the domains into core instead of keeping them in its own cache. it makes no sense to have them in two places. after that, there would be only one function in domain module (is_domain_local(pseudo_variable)) that would call corresponding core function, which means that perhaps then also this function should be pushed to core. then the question is, what to do with domain_reload function? on the other hand, it is still don't understand, what the advantage would be if other modules call a core function instead of calling a function exported from domain module. it would just make core bigger for someone who does not need domains at all. -- juha ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSER-Devel] more presence errors
Henning Westerholt writes: i've noticed that both traces have a database error in the logs. Perhaps this was caused from my recent reworks.. Or perhaps there exists an issue with the presence module if a database query fails? why would the query start failing like that when it has worked before? it looks to me that this problem has appeared after changes either in presence of database modules. i haven't followed if there has been any changed in presence modules recently that could have caused this. -- juha ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSER-Devel] documentation effort
Hello, Henning, a new mailing list has been setup to conduct and coordinate on documentations effort: [EMAIL PROTECTED] . http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openser-docs Anyone that want to participate to documentation development process, please subscribe to the list. Cheers, Daniel On 02/25/08 15:28, Edson wrote: Hi... I get contact with Michiel on Friday and he told that he will be back on March, 4th. ‘til there I’ll follow with the ‘clean-up’ that you proposed (dead/unused code on README files)… As soon as the list is ready, I’ll post all changes that I made so that the developers can make a revision and commit or discuss it. Just as an idea: I’d say that all developers (with SVN access, maybe) should also subscribe to this new list, so that they also be aware on what we do. Edson *From:* Henning Westerholt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* segunda-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2008 09:57 *To:* devel@lists.openser.org; Edson *Cc:* Michiel ten Hagen *Subject:* Re: [OpenSER-Devel] documentation effort On Friday 22 February 2008, Michiel ten Hagen wrote: During the IRC meetings I proposed to take on some of the work on improving the documentation. For this I recommend the following: There already is lots of documentation on openser (and SER) distributed on the web and also the openser wiki does contain lots information but apparently this is not found by new users. A 'official openser guide' would be the appropriate solution for this, this way a single consistent source of information for new users is available. [..] Hi Michiel, having an 'openser guide' would be a really great thing. I agree, all existing documentation on openser.org should be consolidated in one place. Its preferable to create the guide using DocBook XML and svn with a small team. MoinMoin supports wiki - docbook conversions, we could use that or create some XSLT ourselves. Using a DocBook - wiki workflow allows web users to pinpoint mistakes or make small additions but leave the team to create a consistent document. Well, we're using dokuwiki at the moment, and not MoinMoin. There exists also a xslt docbook plugin for this wiki, but this is not that maintained and performant i think. If we have a guide then we could just place it on the webserver and link from the wiki. But these are details, no need to discuss this now as long as we don't have a guide at all. ;-) Next the guide other improvements such as a faq are usefull but I suggest to focus on a guide. Tasks - Create a single point of entry for documentation - Create an openser-doc mailing list - Create an separate doc tree in svn - Create a small documentation team - Create an 'official openser guide' To the tasks: I think we should start with the mailling list. Bogdan or Daniel, perhaps one of you could create the 'openser-docs' list? Forming a small team sounds good. Edson already contacted me last week, he probably already want to join this effort. Perhaps sending an announcement to the user list will also help to get some people joining this project. Please let me know if there is something i could do to help you in getting this started. You'll will probably need svn access, perhaps we can discuss this after the list has been setup and the first steps in toward the guide has been taken. I will be busy the rest of the month but after that I am willing to work on the procedures and start with a basic guide. Great, i'm looking forward to this. Cheers, Henning ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSER-Devel] radius issues in IRC minutes
Hello, I think my proposal was misunderstood in the first place. By compacting the RADIUS modules I was not really meaning to remove/merge some of them, but to collect duplicate code in a single place, and reuse from there. Also, if we get to the conclusion that it is good to be done, that does not mean you have to do it :-) So here are more details and reasons for the proposal. - in the past, any time when the libradiusclient was updated, all radius modules were affected (e.g., see commits on SER repository related to migration to libradiusclient-ng or updates/bugs related to this library). - in the eventuality of adding failover/load balancing support (ability to connect to many RADIUS servers depending on different situations and usecases), we will have the whole engine in a single place, and once added there, all radius modules will benefit of (LDAP module has kind of such approach) - as DIAMETER has same attribute-value architecture, we may find (some investigation needed here) that we can reuse the rest of the code in *radius modules to add the diameter support just by replacing the connector module (e.g., assuming we will have radius and diameter modules) - there are many radius servers out there, although not requested so far, in case one wants to add support for other radius server which has a different client library, lot of duplicate will be required These are my main points about this item, any comment is appreciated. Cheers, Daniel On 02/21/08 00:25, Juha Heinanen wrote: i read irc meeting minutes (could not participate myself due to 12 hour time difference to CET). here are my comments regarding radius modules. i don't think that just having a smaller number of modules can justify putting a lot of work on writing some new api for radius modules. i would rather put my time in implementing some new functionality. if there is a need to change the module interface in radius modules due to some changes in core, i'm willing to do that work. just let me know when a change is coming and what kind. nevertheless, there may be a possibility to integrate some radius related modules. i can take a look. i'm however skeptical regarding integrating auth_radius, because it is a sub-module of auth module. -- juha ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [OpenSER-Devel] new cseq test?
Hello, On 02/23/08 09:39, Juha Heinanen wrote: i haven't noticed this before: Feb 23 09:35:50 rautu /usr/sbin/openser[23869]: ERROR:registrar:test_max_contacts: invalid cseq for aor [EMAIL PROTECTED] it is a new test? cseq in register was smaller than in location database. i have restarted by UA. should it somehow know that cseq it used earlier? did it changed the call id? More details about matching algorithm: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.4.x/usrloc.html#CONTACT-MATCHING-ALGS Cheers, Daniel -- juha ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
[OpenSER-Devel] [ openser-Feature Requests-1901736 ] return statement should accept pv argument
Feature Requests item #1901736, was opened at 2008-02-25 14:36
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=743023aid=1901736group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: return statement should accept pv argument
Initial Comment:
return statement should accept pv argument. below is an example of a problem
that this feature would solve.
-- juha
it should be possible to write this:
route[1] {
route(2);
return($retcode);
}
instead of this:
route[1] {
route(2);
switch($retcode) {
case 1:
return(1);
case 2:
return(2);
default:
return(-1);
}
}
--
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=743023aid=1901736group_id=139143
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
[OpenSER-Devel] [ openser-Bugs-1901793 ] uri_radius error during start
Bugs item #1901793, was opened at 2008-02-26 01:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=743020aid=1901793group_id=139143 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: ver devel Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Norm Brandinger (norm_brandinger) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: uri_radius error during start Initial Comment: The following error is thrown at startup: ERROR:uri_radius:mod_init: uri_radius: can't get code for the SIP-URI-Host attribute The only uri_radius setting in openser.cfg is: loadmodule uri_radius.so Note that adding the following had no effect on the above error message: modparam(uri_radius, use_sip_uri_host, 0) -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=743020aid=1901793group_id=139143 ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
[OpenSER-Devel] [ openser-Bugs-1901793 ] uri_radius error during start
SourceForge.net writes: Initial Comment: The following error is thrown at startup: ERROR:uri_radius:mod_init: uri_radius: can't get code for the SIP-URI-Host attribute norm, sorry about that. try now. -- juha ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
