Traffic sofort um 90% erhöhen!!!!!

2003-02-15 Thread uve
http://www.traffictausch.net/jsmode/referrer.php?id=1084

Proffesioneller Exchange mit dem jeder Webmaster Erfolg hat.

Steigern sie ihren Traffic sofort um 90%
Wenn sie viele Besucher auf ihren Webseiten haben wollen sind sie bei 
traffictausch.net genau richtig.

http://www.traffictausch.net/jsmode/referrer.php?id=1084
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel



Release date for 4.3

2003-02-15 Thread Florian Lindner
Hello,
when do you guess will 4.3 be released? What are your estimates?
Thanks,
Florian
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel



Re: Release date for 4.3

2003-02-15 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Florian Lindner wrote:

 Hello,
 when do you guess will 4.3 be released? What are your estimates?

My guess:
When the show-stopping bugs are fixed. 

-- 
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel



Re: repeated X restarts with i810 not freeing sys resources?

2003-02-15 Thread Patrick Charles
 I am still seeing the same behavior.

 I presume you rebooted after installing the new module, or explicitly
 unloaded the old one?

 I guess I'll need to try this same kernel.

 David

yes. i rebooted.

btw. had to make a very small mod to your agpgart_be.c source with this kernel.
PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_865_GM_0 isn't defined agp.h and isn't provided by 
/lib/modules/2.4.20-2.21/build/include/linux/pci_ids.h (or wherever it would show up 
in the kernel headers?).

thanks,
-pat

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel



Re: repeated X restarts with i810 not freeing sys resources?

2003-02-15 Thread David Dawes
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 11:27:16PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:

 To simplify my environment, I did a fresh install of Red Hat 8.0.
 
 I then installed kernel 2.4.20-2.21 and XFree86-4.2.99.3-20030115,
 taken as RPM's from the RH81 'phoebe' beta, required for the i845 support.
 
 So, I now have a 'clean' setup which doesn't contain any of the pieces
  which I previously downloaded/built from various cvs repositories.
 
 On this machine (which has quite a few services running since it is a
  default 8.0 workstation-type install), it only takes 6 restart iterations
  of X before the system hangs.
 
 I (unfortunately) have 4 of these brand new GX60 machines. I see the exact
  same behavior on all of them.
 
 Therefore, I don't think the problem is specific to a particular system.
  By using the RH RPM's, also doesn't appear that the problem stems from
  something peculiar in my build environment.
 
 You tried on an i845G and can't reproduce, but you are using RH7.3?

 Yep, RH7.3 with its default kernel plus the agpgart driver referenced
 above.  Could you try your setup using that agpgart driver?  That
 might help narrow down if the problem lies there or elsewhere.  I
 don't see how the problem could be anywhere other than the kernel
 or agpgart driver.

 David

i replaced agpgart.o with one recompiled from agpgart-85x.tar.gz

% uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.4.20-2.21 #1 Wed Jan 15 20:31:35 EST 2003 i686 i686 
i386 GNU/Linux

% ls -l /lib/modules/2.4.20-2.21/kernel/drivers/char/agp
-rw-r--r--1 root root64920 Feb 14 12:21 agpgart.o
-rw-r--r--1 root root23738 Jan 15 18:38 agpgart.o.gz.bak


I am still seeing the same behavior.

I presume you rebooted after installing the new module, or explicitly
unloaded the old one?

I guess I'll need to try this same kernel.

I downloaded the 2.4.20-2.21 kernel source rpm from RH's phoebe beta.
I can get the kernel to build, but not modules.  So, I built the agpgart
driver into the kernel and tested it that way.  I can reproduce what
you're seeing with this kernel.

I also tried the stock 2.4.20 kernel from ftp.kernel.org, and it works
fine, and doesn't show the problem you're seeing.

So, it looks like some difference between RH's kernel and the stock
kernel.  You'll have to follow that up further with Red Hat (or use a
kernel from ftp.kernel.org).

David
-- 
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect  The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel



Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Some DRM related changes for running multiple i810/830M X servers

2003-02-15 Thread David Dawes
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 06:24:50PM -0500, Leif Delgass wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, David Dawes wrote:

[snip]

 There are some more serious things holding up 4.3, including the issue
 that Leif mentioned here a couple of days ago.  I haven't seen anyone
 comment on his proposed solution for that one either...
 
 David

I was wondering about that myself. :) I'll reiterate the problem, but this
time with a patch to give people something more concrete to comment on.  
This is, I think, the easiest and quickest fix, if not necessarily the
most correct.  This patch does the following:

Thanks Leif.  I'll commit that now.  If it needs any further fine tuning
we can do that later.

David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect  The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel



Organization of data for XImages

2003-02-15 Thread individual
Hi.

I haven't been able to find a specification of he layout of image data 
that XCreateImage() expects.

My natural instinct is to feed it data as follows. Each row in the 
following scheme represents 1 byte (in the case of a 16bpp image)

[ red Most Significant Byte ]
[ red Least Significant Byte ]
[ green Most Significant Byte ]
[ green Least Significant Byte ]
[ blue Most Significant Byte ]
[ blue Least Significant Byte ]

The above represents one pixel, the top-left hand corner pixel. Next 
pixel would be the one to its left, and so on, completing one scanline.

An alternate data layout would be to have first all the red data for a 
scanline, then all the green data and then all the blue data for the 
scanline.

Would someone please tell me which format XCreateImage() expects?


Thanks.

Paul

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: issues with trident card

2003-02-15 Thread Olivier Fourdan
Hi Alan,

On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 12:44, Alan Hourihane wrote:

 Have a go at trying to fix it with changing the line above.

Well, I guess I've been too fast here. The problem doesn't come from the
code I cited, sorry.

Actually, it seems to be related to the size of the output (or maybe a
ratio between the source and destination sizes ?) Xv window, but not the
way I thought it was... Sorry about this. It seems I'm not able to track
down what is the exact limit for the problem to show up. It's probably
something like a 600x400 window. I've added traces, all arround and I've
also tried to remove the VID_DOUBLE_LINEBUFFER_FOR_WIDE_SRC flag and it
has no effect.

Amazingly enough, I have 1 video that doesn't show the problem, whatever
the size of the output window (maybe RGB not showing the problem while
YUV does ? I don't know if that makes any sense). All other videos I
have show the problem.

Any clue where I should look next ? 

Cheers,
-- 
Olivier Fourdan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xfce.org

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel



Re: Organization of data for XImages

2003-02-15 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, individual wrote:

 Hi.
 
 I haven't been able to find a specification of he layout of image data 
 that XCreateImage() expects.
 

   The red, green and blue masks within the pixel are in the XImage
structure.  The bits_per_pixel (actual size of each pixel) is also
in there.


Mark.

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel



Re: Release date for 4.3

2003-02-15 Thread David Dawes
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 04:59:00PM +, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Florian Lindner wrote:

 Hello,
 when do you guess will 4.3 be released? What are your estimates?

My guess:
When the show-stopping bugs are fixed. 

That's about right.  I should have more information about the updated
release schedule available within the next few days, and I'll post it
here then.

In the meantime, if any of you are aware of serious bugs that still
haven't been fixed in the current CVS trunk version, please post details
here.

Also, a lot of documentation still hasn't been updated for this release.
Don't assume that someone else will do it, so if you see things that are
missing or out of date in the existing documentation, please send updates
(to [EMAIL PROTECTED]).  The current documentation (including man pages)
can be viewed online at http://www.xfree86.org/snapshot/.

Thanks.

David
-- 
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect  The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel