Re: Install errors with 4.3.0 on RH7.3?

2003-03-21 Thread Kendall Bennett
Andrew C Aitchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It looks to me as if your make World failed (but kept going as it
 usually does) so install tried again and failed.
 
 I have
   xc/programs/rstart/contexts/@Aliases
   xc/programs/rstart/samples/contexts.odt1/@Aliases
   xc/programs/rstart/samples/contexts.sun/@Aliases
 all with matching ,v files, so it may be a problem with your check out,
 or another case of one broken platform in 12.

Well I found my problem. We build all our versions of XFree86 using 
source code stored in Perforce (a branch to our devel tree that allows 
easy merging back/forth). As it turns out, Perforce does not seem to like 
filenames with an '@' symbol in them, and then never got checked into 
Perforce!! I will have to see if I can manually check those files into 
the machine, otherwise we will have a problem ;-(.

What exactly are these files for? Is there any reason why they using the 
@ symbol in file names specifically? 

Regards,

---
Kendall Bennett
Chief Executive Officer
SciTech Software, Inc.
Phone: (530) 894 8400
http://www.scitechsoft.com

~ SciTech SNAP - The future of device driver technology! ~

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


_XAllocTemp and _XFreeTemp in Xrender on X11R5

2003-03-21 Thread Albert Chin
I tried building Xrender from XFree86-4.3.0 on Solaris 2.5.1 (X11R5).
It has neither _XAllocTemp or _XFreeTemp. Any way to work around this
in Xrender/Picture.c?

-- 
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: xfig crashes XFree86 server (4.3.0) with trident driver

2003-03-21 Thread Gary E. RAFE, Ph.D.
!   If it's reproducible and you can get a gdb backtrace, that would
!be useful.   Baring that, seeing it if goes away with Option NoAccel
!would at least narrow things down.  

I gave this another go with a newly-built debug server,
XAA and trident driver modules, and got the following
backtrace information:

(gdb) bt
#0  0x28389b78 in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4
#1  0x283ca742 in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4
#2  0x80bc73a in goodbye (abortflag=1) at w_cmdpanel.c:538
#3  0x809c275 in emergency_quit (abortflag=1) at u_error.c:98
#4  0x809c0a8 in error_handler (err_sig=1) at u_error.c:52
#5  0xbfbfffac in ?? ()
#6  0x282b1d49 in XrmGetFileDatabase () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#7  0x28294053 in XGetErrorDatabaseText () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#8  0x809c149 in X_error_handler (d=0x81d5800, err_ev=0xbfbff27c)
at u_error.c:70
#9  0x282af8a0 in _XIOError () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#10 0x282ad2fa in _XRead () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#11 0x282add30 in _XReply () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#12 0x282a99dc in XSync () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#13 0x810b07a in app_flush () at w_util.c:170
#14 0x810e405 in process_pending () at w_util.c:1122
#15 0x808a802 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfbff8e0) at main.c:1256
#16 0x804d859 in _start ()

No mention of trident_drv.o or libxaa.a here.
Do I need more of the XFree86-4.3.0 source tree built (all?) as debug ?
--
Gary E. RAFE, Ph.D.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: xfig crashes XFree86 server (4.3.0) with trident driver

2003-03-21 Thread Mark Vojkovich
   Sorry, I meant a backtrace of XFree86, not of xfig.


Mark.

On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Gary E. RAFE, Ph.D. wrote:

 !   If it's reproducible and you can get a gdb backtrace, that would
 !be useful.   Baring that, seeing it if goes away with Option NoAccel
 !would at least narrow things down.  
 
 I gave this another go with a newly-built debug server,
 XAA and trident driver modules, and got the following
 backtrace information:
 
 (gdb) bt
 #0  0x28389b78 in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4
 #1  0x283ca742 in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4
 #2  0x80bc73a in goodbye (abortflag=1) at w_cmdpanel.c:538
 #3  0x809c275 in emergency_quit (abortflag=1) at u_error.c:98
 #4  0x809c0a8 in error_handler (err_sig=1) at u_error.c:52
 #5  0xbfbfffac in ?? ()
 #6  0x282b1d49 in XrmGetFileDatabase () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
 #7  0x28294053 in XGetErrorDatabaseText () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
 #8  0x809c149 in X_error_handler (d=0x81d5800, err_ev=0xbfbff27c)
 at u_error.c:70
 #9  0x282af8a0 in _XIOError () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
 #10 0x282ad2fa in _XRead () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
 #11 0x282add30 in _XReply () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
 #12 0x282a99dc in XSync () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
 #13 0x810b07a in app_flush () at w_util.c:170
 #14 0x810e405 in process_pending () at w_util.c:1122
 #15 0x808a802 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfbff8e0) at main.c:1256
 #16 0x804d859 in _start ()
 
 No mention of trident_drv.o or libxaa.a here.
 Do I need more of the XFree86-4.3.0 source tree built (all?) as debug ?
 --
 Gary E. RAFE, Ph.D.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [Dri-devel] Re: XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-21 Thread Jos Fonseca
No DRI developer expressed his interest or opposition, probably because
there isn't opposition, or simply no interest. In either case I see no
reasons why not proceed, so I'll open a bug to address this. I'll ask
that [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the same addressed used on SF BT
system) is set as the default owner for DRI bugs.

Also, what's the general mailing list one can subscribe to receive
notifications everytime a bug is open?

José Fonseca


On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 12:07:56PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
 On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 08:04:22PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
  An XFree86 bugzilla is now available at http://bugs.xfree86.org/.
  Many thanks to Hewlett-Packard for supplying the hardware, netSweng for
  hosting, and the many developers who helped configure and test it.
 
 I know that the current policy on DRI is to post bugs on dri-users or
 dri-devel, but with XFree86 having a bug database is inevitable that
 people will eventually post bugs there too. Therefore what's the
 possibility of:
  - Setting up a general owner for DRI bugs, which probably would be
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  - automatically set the owner of DRI bugs, e.g., by the users adding a
DRI keyword, or associating the XFree86 Server-DRI extension
component.
  - Add the possibility to add comments to bugs via e-mail.
 
 Basically I would like to be possible that:
  - An user adds a bug concerning DRI
  - The owner is (either manually or automatically) set to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], which receives the bug
  - Any developer on the dri-devel list which has an account on
XFree86 Bugzilla can reply and that comment is added to the bug
database.
  - Certain maintainence tasks (such as closing the bug, read an
attachment) will require to use Bugzilla web interface, but bugzilla
can be configured to remember our login, so it's straightforward.
 
 I would appreciate if the XFree86 and DRI developers considered this.

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [Dri-devel] Re: XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-21 Thread Keith Whitwell
José Fonseca wrote:
No DRI developer expressed his interest or opposition, probably because
there isn't opposition, or simply no interest. In either case I see no
reasons why not proceed, so I'll open a bug to address this. I'll ask
that [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the same addressed used on SF BT
system) is set as the default owner for DRI bugs.
Also, what's the general mailing list one can subscribe to receive
notifications everytime a bug is open?
Sorry...  I think it's a good idea as proposed.

Keith




___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: [Dri-devel] Re: XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fre, 2003-03-21 at 21:07, José Fonseca wrote:
 No DRI developer expressed his interest or opposition, probably because
 there isn't opposition, or simply no interest. In either case I see no
 reasons why not proceed, so I'll open a bug to address this. I'll ask
 that [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the same addressed used on SF BT
 system) is set as the default owner for DRI bugs.

I think it's a good idea but that dri-devel makes more sense than
dri-patches.

 Also, what's the general mailing list one can subscribe to receive
 notifications everytime a bug is open?

Currently [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets them all.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast

___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel