Re: [DDN] bogus new york times article

2006-04-03 Thread BBracey
The problem is that the New York Times reporter doesn't understand that 
technologies are fluid.. if I can use that as a descriptor.The state of the art 
is 
constantly changing and users have to adjust to continue to be good users. 
Sometimes they have to buy a number of devices that modify or change use.

 How we use the tools, how we see the use of technology is based on a number 
of modifiers. One of those modifiers would be the people who are using it. I 
am not sure how the cultural base should be defined but I suppose the minority 
groups should be descriptors, but, should include those who speak English and 
those who do not. They never mentioned those who may have to have some 
adaptability to be able to use it because of disability. They never mentioned 
the 
applications of technology everywhere in society. Some of the new technologies 
are not available to all for applications at home, in medicine, in school, in 
the office, etc.

The government often uses fuzzy modifiers too. All of the schools are wired? 
Well , what constitutes wired? A cable drop in a school in the office. A lab 
in a high school? There are other ways now of connecting . There has to be a 
reason that there is a big struggle for wi-fi and that is that the citizens of 
many cities don't have connectivity. Having a computer, or a computer lab does 
not constitute fluency of use.

Remember that during Katrina first responders did not have use of 
technologies. As people watched that gathering storm, there were modifiers that 
made them 
decide on actions to take. We may never know the whole story of what happened 
but we know that the digital divide in that case was information, and 
emergency service difficulty with a breakdown in communication. There was a 
considerable Latino and Vietnamese part of the citizenry, whose needs were not 
covered 
by mainstream media for the most part. That was a digital divide.

The problem of Katrina was one heck of a digital divide for all the world to 
see. Information was a modifier and transportation was also. Permission was 
not granted for some to use the information they had and or to travel out of 
the 
place. But the most interesting thing about the legacy of Katrina is that the 
Hollywood and television lenses were not there, we were seen in all of our 
separate but unequal economical apartheid practices. You may remember  
Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison.
That literature was not a quirk, and could be written again, with an update. 
Ralph might be blogging , is all and his companion could have been the coyote 
in Central Park.

Research in the past decade has shown that computer technology is an 
effective means for wideningeducational opportunities, but most teachers 
neither use 
technology as an instructional delivery system nor integrate technology into 
their curriculum. This qualitative study examined the classroom practice of 30 “
tech-savvy” teachers who used computer technology in their instruction, how 
much they used it, the obstacles they had to overcome to succeed in its use, 
and 
their general issues and concerns regarding technology.

No Child Left Behind, according to the NYTimes has reduced many schools to 
teaching two subjects, reading, and math. Apparently some of the kids do get 
Physical Education. Yippee...no science, and humanities, and then afterschool 
more of the same. No wonder the children don't like school as we have created 
it.

 If one is in very rural and distant areas, some of which at this time are 
being connected with wi-fi in a variety of schemes, the struggle is to create 
communities of connectivity. Think of the people in Navajo .. the land of the 
Navajo. Few, sparse phones some 60 miles apart in special community places. A 
struggle to get the basic telephony ( can you hear me now?)

A person with a computer , who does email, is one application, but if we are 
talking about the digital divide there are so many other modifiers. Facility 
of use is a modifer. What can you do with the technology you have? What 
adaptors or cool tools do you have and how do they affect the ways in which you 
are a 
user.

Why did the New York Times get  the idea of the digital divide wrong?

They talked about connectivity, in basic terminology. We all know that there 
are various
levels of technology infrastructure. Sometimes the location of where you are 
in the world
make a difference in the resources you have to use. Basically you have to
 • analyze the technology
 • describe its effects
 • interpret those effects
understand infrastructure and deployment , and areas within a country that 
need more support or different kinds of infrastructure. Tell people that there 
are areas that are just getting connected, and describe the ways of connecting 
that are available with some percentages. Global data is available too But 
this one was specifically targeted for the US.

We know that cities are struggling to do the wi-fi because they 

Re: [DDN] bogus new york times article, Letters to the Editor...?

2006-04-03 Thread Nicole English

Hi, Andy
What if you (or others on this list) were to write Letters to the 
Editor...?


Anyone can do a letter...  you don't have to be a journalist 

The more letters of a similar theme, the more likely that at least one 
is to get printed

:)
Has anyone tried that strategy...?
NE...

Nicole English
Interdisciplinary PhD Program, Sociology/Psychology
Instructor, Program for Adult College Education (PACE)
University of Missouri--Kansas City (UMKC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Andy Carvin wrote:

The NY Times would never let me submit an article on the digital 
divide as a journalist, because of my bias on the subject, but there's 
always the possibility of an opinion piece. Unfortunately I've tried 
that a couple of times in the past and they've never been accepted by 
them. Anyone on the list have success in placing an op/ed in the 
Times? -andy


Cindy Lemcke-Hoong wrote:


Hello Andy,
How about you write one for New York Time as a guest writer? Perhaps 
then the public would get a better picture of digital divide?


Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Andy Carvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Phil,

My blog post earlier today is a response to some of the issues raised 
in the article. I was surprised by the tone myself; when I talked to 
the author about a month ago, I got the impression he'd be writing it 
somewhat differently.


http://www.andycarvin.com/archives/2006/03/race_and_the_digital.html



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in 
the body of the message.





___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] bogus new york times article

2006-04-02 Thread Cindy Lemcke-Hoong
Hello Andy, 

How about you write one for New York Time as a guest writer? Perhaps then the 
public would get a better picture of digital divide?

Cindy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Andy Carvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Phil,

My blog post earlier today is a response to some of the issues raised in 
the article. I was surprised by the tone myself; when I talked to the 
author about a month ago, I got the impression he'd be writing it 
somewhat differently.

http://www.andycarvin.com/archives/2006/03/race_and_the_digital.html



=

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


[DDN] bogus new york times article

2006-03-31 Thread Phil Shapiro
hi DDN community members -

the new york times botched it on this article covering the digital divide.
although they include a quote from andy carvin, the whole tenor of the article
is off. they're asking the wrong question. they don't get it at all.

http://digg.com/technology/Digital_Divide_Closing_as_Blacks_Turn_to_Internet

  http://tinyurl.com/g4ern

- phil

   

-- 
Phil Shapiro  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.digitaldivide.net/profile/pshapiro
http://digg.com/users/pshapiro/submitted
http://www.his.com/pshapiro/stories.menu.html

Wisdom starts with wonder. - Socrates
Learning happens through gentleness.


___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.


Re: [DDN] bogus new york times article

2006-03-31 Thread Andy Carvin

Hi Phil,

My blog post earlier today is a response to some of the issues raised in 
the article. I was surprised by the tone myself; when I talked to the 
author about a month ago, I got the impression he'd be writing it 
somewhat differently.


http://www.andycarvin.com/archives/2006/03/race_and_the_digital.html

Phil Shapiro wrote:

hi DDN community members -

the new york times botched it on this article covering the digital divide.
although they include a quote from andy carvin, the whole tenor of the article
is off. they're asking the wrong question. they don't get it at all.

http://digg.com/technology/Digital_Divide_Closing_as_Blacks_Turn_to_Internet

  http://tinyurl.com/g4ern

- phil

   



--
--
Andy Carvin
acarvin (at) edc . org
andycarvin (at) yahoo . com

http://www.digitaldivide.net
http://www.andycarvin.com
--
___
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.