[digitalradio] Software defined receivers, versus transceivers, for digital modes ?

2009-08-03 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I note that Flexradio is introducing a QRP SDR transceiver later this
year for under US$700 , it will be general coverage and support all HF
bands.  I'm mainly interested in SDR for the ability to monitor a
whole band for digital signals and it occurred to me to that perhaps a
receiver, as opposed to a transceiver, might be useful.  Then, switch
to my other rigs for transmit.  It may be a step backwards to the
days of separates , anyone tried this?  Are there any multiband SDR
receivers with all the usual amateur radio bells and whistles?

-- 
Andy


Re: [digitalradio] Software defined receivers, versus transceivers, for digital modes ?

2009-08-03 Thread Bill V WA7NWP

 The goal is also for DM780 to take data from the SDR console and use it to
 display / monitor up to 200kHz of bandwidth.

Lets not forget the opportunities here to even transmit with wider
bandwidths then before.   There are likely both weak signal and faster
data realms here we can finally begin to explore...

For a starter, how about a 10 KHz version of the QPSKx25 mode...

73
Bill - WA7NWP


Re: [digitalradio] Software defined receivers, versus transceivers, for digital modes ?

2009-08-03 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
- Original Message - 
From: Bill V WA7NWP wa7...@gmail.com

 For a starter, how about a 10 KHz version of the QPSKx25 mode...


Well - this assumes you have a SDR transmitter of course, but the SDR 
SoftRock is cheap and more than good enough. With a simple 10 watt amp 
you'll have everything needed...

Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com 



Re: [digitalradio] Software defined receivers, versus transceivers, for digital modes ?

2009-08-03 Thread Andrew O'Brien
The Softrock radios make me a little nervouse because their
availability seems sporadic and their website makes you wonder if they
are still a full busines.   Is the V9  mentioned in this thread a
multiband?  Ideally hams would be beter off with one SDR that covers
80-10 rather thans several for each band.  Also,I would like to avoid
kits.



On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Simon (HB9DRV)simon.br...@kns.ch wrote:


 - Original Message -
 From: Bill V WA7NWP wa7...@gmail.com

 For a starter, how about a 10 KHz version of the QPSKx25 mode...


 Well - this assumes you have a SDR transmitter of course, but the SDR
 SoftRock is cheap and more than good enough. With a simple 10 watt amp
 you'll have everything needed...

 Simon Brown, HB9DRV
 www.ham-radio-deluxe.com

 



-- 
Andy


Re: [digitalradio] Software defined receivers, versus transceivers, for digital modes ?

2009-08-03 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
Hi,

Yes, multiband, the website isn't too clear but the Yahoo! group is. There 
are guys who will assemble for you.

Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com

- Original Message - 
From: Andrew O'Brien andrewob...@gmail.com


 The Softrock radios make me a little nervouse because their
 availability seems sporadic and their website makes you wonder if they
 are still a full busines.   Is the V9  mentioned in this thread a
 multiband?  Ideally hams would be beter off with one SDR that covers
 80-10 rather thans several for each band.  Also,I would like to avoid
 kits.