Re: [Dspace-tech] Problem with new submission
Hi Daniel, When trying to make a new submission, after the first four steps (Describe, Describe, Describe, Upload) the Verify page shows almost all data as null values. Does somebody know how this can be possible or how can I solve it? Is this happening on a fresh install of the software, or have you made any modifications? Thanks, Stuart _ Gwasanaethau Gwybodaeth Information Services Prifysgol Cymru Aberystwyth University of Wales Aberystwyth E-bost / E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ffon / Tel: (01970) 622860 _ - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
[Dspace-tech] How to get a new handle..?
hi all, i have a fully running setup of dspace on my server. How do we assign a unique handle to every new submission into DSpace..? right now, the default handle of hdl:123456789/ is assigned. -- Sahil MCA(SE) USIT - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
Re: [Dspace-tech] Problem with new submission
Hi Stuart: It is happening on a fresh install. Thank you for you attention. - Mensaje original De: CLewis [sdl] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: Dspace Tech dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net Enviado: martes, 31 de julio, 2007 2:14:56 Asunto: Re: [Dspace-tech] Problem with new submission Hi Daniel, When trying to make a new submission, after the first four steps (Describe, Describe, Describe, Upload) the Verify page shows almost all data as null values. Does somebody know how this can be possible or how can I solve it? Is this happening on a fresh install of the software, or have you made any modifications? Thanks, Stuart _ Gwasanaethau Gwybodaeth Information Services Prifysgol Cymru Aberystwyth University of Wales Aberystwyth E-bost / E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ffon / Tel: (01970) 622860 _ - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech __ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! Regístrate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/ - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
Re: [Dspace-tech] Reply-To Header missing - list misconfigured?
Folks: I'm currently administering the tech dev lists would gladly reconfigure if the preponderance of opinion is in favor. I'm by no means a mail admin, and was following the recommendations of the GNU mailman docs, which I reproduce here: reply_goes_to_list (general): Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is strongly recommended for most mailing lists. This option controls what Mailman does to the Reply-To: header in messages flowing through this mailing list. When set to Poster, no Reply-To: header is added by Mailman, although if one is present in the original message, it is not stripped. Setting this value to either This list or Explicit address causes Mailman to insert a specific Reply-To: header in all messages, overriding the header in the original message if necessary (Explicit address inserts the value of reply_to_address). There are many reasons not to introduce or override the Reply-To: header. One is that some posters depend on their own Reply-To: settings to convey their valid return address. Another is that modifying Reply-To: makes it much more difficult to send private replies. See `Reply-To' Munging Considered Harmful for a general discussion of this issue. See Reply-To Munging Considered Useful for a dissenting opinion. Some mailing lists have restricted posting privileges, with a parallel list devoted to discussions. Examples are `patches' or `checkin' lists, where software changes are posted by a revision control system, but discussion about the changes occurs on a developers mailing list. To support these types of mailing lists, select Explicit address and set the Reply-To: address below to point to the parallel list. Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is strongly recommended for most mailing lists. Poster This list Explicit address If anyone has further input, please share with the list. Thanks, Richard R On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 11:38 -0500, Dorothea Salo wrote: The result of a missing reply-to header is that you have to use the reply-all function of your mail client to answer back to the list, which seems unnatural. In most cases, answers seem to be sent in private mail as implied by the missing header. As of my perception, this makes the list *more* noisy as required and renders the list archive less useful. Let me explain. I agree. Useful responses are not publicly archived, which means they are not searchable, which means we get the same questions over and over -- not because there is no answer, but because there is no *public* answer. I would very much appreciate the reconfiguration of dspace-tech to reply-to-list instead of reply-to-sender. Dorothea - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
Re: [Dspace-tech] Reply-To Header missing - list misconfigured?
For those who haven't seen this: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html There's nothing I can add. -hilmar On Jul 31, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Richard Rodgers wrote: Folks: I'm currently administering the tech dev lists would gladly reconfigure if the preponderance of opinion is in favor. I'm by no means a mail admin, and was following the recommendations of the GNU mailman docs, which I reproduce here: reply_goes_to_list (general): Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is strongly recommended for most mailing lists. This option controls what Mailman does to the Reply-To: header in messages flowing through this mailing list. When set to Poster, no Reply-To: header is added by Mailman, although if one is present in the original message, it is not stripped. Setting this value to either This list or Explicit address causes Mailman to insert a specific Reply-To: header in all messages, overriding the header in the original message if necessary (Explicit address inserts the value of reply_to_address). There are many reasons not to introduce or override the Reply-To: header. One is that some posters depend on their own Reply-To: settings to convey their valid return address. Another is that modifying Reply-To: makes it much more difficult to send private replies. See `Reply-To' Munging Considered Harmful for a general discussion of this issue. See Reply-To Munging Considered Useful for a dissenting opinion. Some mailing lists have restricted posting privileges, with a parallel list devoted to discussions. Examples are `patches' or `checkin' lists, where software changes are posted by a revision control system, but discussion about the changes occurs on a developers mailing list. To support these types of mailing lists, select Explicit address and set the Reply-To: address below to point to the parallel list. Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is strongly recommended for most mailing lists. Poster This list Explicit address If anyone has further input, please share with the list. Thanks, Richard R On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 11:38 -0500, Dorothea Salo wrote: The result of a missing reply-to header is that you have to use the reply-all function of your mail client to answer back to the list, which seems unnatural. In most cases, answers seem to be sent in private mail as implied by the missing header. As of my perception, this makes the list *more* noisy as required and renders the list archive less useful. Let me explain. I agree. Useful responses are not publicly archived, which means they are not searchable, which means we get the same questions over and over -- not because there is no answer, but because there is no *public* answer. I would very much appreciate the reconfiguration of dspace-tech to reply-to-list instead of reply-to-sender. Dorothea -- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech -- === : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at duke dot edu : === - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
Re: [Dspace-tech] Reply-To Header missing - list misconfigured?
Hello, Am 31.07.2007 um 18:16 schrieb Hilmar Lapp: For those who haven't seen this: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html There's nothing I can add. It is always a bad thing to be the advocate ones own behalf, but I cant resist to do so in this case. Unhappily, the article presenting the opposite view seems to have vanished from the web. At least I couldnt find it in a quick search. I wont go in every detail, because I could argue against every single sentence in this post. It is extremly biased by an extreme kind of guy who should never be allowed to make any decisions that have to do with usability. Hear him talk, all what he has to tell is elm can do it. Well, I can do so too. I actually just do. Yes, and every decent MUA has two different commands. The thing is, in 99.999% of all cases you use hit reply and not reply-all, dont you? Do you ever think about when doing? No, you actually wouldnt use such modernistic stuff like email if you were still thinking about every decision you take within a minute. Command-R is stored in your muscular memory. Yes, email is a rather complicated thing one shouldnt tinker with. But the page count of RFCs cant impress me. Yes, I read them regularly too, when I try to solve a problem. At least, I can confirm that the writer of the pamphlet is as knowledgeable to quote the right RFCs. There is only one single technical argument given. Preexisiting reply- to headers might be overriden. Yes. Who uses them? I did a quick search through 2000 messages I archive locally and could not find a single post using it. It might have been a means of organising your accounts when they were expensive. I havent seen such since the times when everybody has half a dozen of them, using syndication services for free or managing all of them centralized with one client. But yes, this might harm in some rare cases. Please speak up if I anybody would be harmed. The argument that it makes things more complicated and breaks elm might be a hint that elm is actually the kind of brain-dead software he is bashing. With *MY* personal favourite email client that every- body in the world could use as well if he/she was such a wizard as I am, it is really easy to reply to the sender, just point on it and choose reply to sender from the contextual menu. Ok, I stop rant-mode. I think it is quite clear what I meant with a biased view in this post (I enjoy such thing, it gives me a chance to counter it). Some mailing lists have restricted posting privileges, with a parallel list devoted to discussions. I made the difference with discussion lists vs. announcement list which is roughly the same. After having said all of the above, I can also tell, that I start integrating the reply-all habit in my muscular memory and that it is not a matter of live and die for me. Bye, Christian - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
Re: [Dspace-tech] Reply-To Header missing - list misconfigured?
For what it's worth, I re-configure the lists I'm responsible for to reply to both the sender and the list. As Christian said, hitting the reply-all button just isn't a reflex I can train into my users. Ralph - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
Re: [Dspace-tech] How to get a new handle..?
Hello, Am 31.07.2007 um 10:46 schrieb Sahil Dave: How do we assign a unique handle to every new submission into DSpace..? right now, the default handle of hdl:123456789/ is assigned. The 123456789 is the authority part of the handle, but not a complete handle by itself. Each item you create should have a different handle like 123456789/1, 123456789/2 and so on. If this does not work, then there is some very basic thing going wrong and you should try to find out why before doing anything else. I guess that this is actually working but you are pondering about getting you own individual naming authority string. This is described in the installation. Besides some technical setup, it requires register- ing with CNRI and signing some documents, paying a low annual fee - administrative stuff. But, before you do, think about whether you really want to do so. DSpace runs fine with the fake string mentioned above that is set in the default config. If you decide to run a proper handle server with an official handle that means that your organisation is willing to spend additional effort on keeping identifiers persistent. It is additional work and thought besides keeping your DSpace installation running, may it be as small as it is. We are thinking about whether it was a real wise decision to do that because we have hardly the money to keep up our basic work. If your server goes down one day because of lack of commitment of your organisation, then all persistent identifiers are vain. If instead you are running the repository for decades ahead, the small overhead of starting early with assignment of handles might pay off by the ease of future migrations. The more deep links to documents on your server from outside your organization you gather, the more valuable it is, to have handles assigned from the beginning. Bye, Christian - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
Re: [Dspace-tech] Reply-To Header missing - list misconfigured?
On Jul 31, 2007, at 3:56 PM, Christian Voelker wrote: The thing is, in 99.999% of all cases you use hit reply and not reply-all, dont you? No. I almost always hit reply-all. If I don't, it's a conscious decision. Do you ever think about when doing? No, and that's why when I hit reply (and not reply all) I expect it to be a private email. It also might be a field-specific preference. I'm on many programming/ open-source project mailing lists, and almost universally, and purposefully, they are set to not munge the reply-to header (for the simple reasons stated in the article). -hilmar -- === : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at duke dot edu : === - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
Re: [Dspace-tech] Problem with new submission
Hello, Am 30.07.2007 um 23:54 schrieb Daniel Fernÿe1ndez: I'm using D-Space 1.4.2 and Oracle 9.2.0.4 running on RedHat Enterprise 3.x As a foreword, I dont know Oracle, only other databases. When trying to make a new submission, after the first four steps (Describe, Describe, Describe, Upload) the Verify page shows almost all data as null values. Really strange. Get the values written to the database? I have not read the code of the associated servlet, but I guess, that the data you enter is kept in memory as part of the DSpace context you carry with you during submission and does not get written to the db at all within the first three steps, effectively only using read access. You might use something equivalent to pgAdmin and have a look to the database. I guess, the item should be there at the step fourth step and that the verify page tries to get it from there as opposed to the previous pages. But then, there should be a log entry as well. Pondering. If you cant find the item, check your db privileges. Is there any difference in how you access the database as compared to the moment when you installed DSpace? Bye, Christian - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
Re: [Dspace-tech] Reply-To Header missing - list misconfigured?
Admittedly, I don't have a strong opinion either way. Most other listservs I'm on do munge the Reply-To header so that you always reply to the list. I'd also admit that annoys me sometimes when I just want to reply only to the sender (and even in Thunderbird, I cannot do that without manually replacing the list's email address with the sender's). All in all, I wonder if Ralph LeVan's suggestion of adding *both* the list and the sender to the Reply-To would be a nice compromise. :) - Tim -- Tim Donohue Research Programmer, Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (IDEALS) 135 Grainger Engineering Library University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.ideals.uiuc.edu phone: (217) 333-4648 fax: (217) 244-7764 - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
Re: [Dspace-tech] Reply-To Header missing - list misconfigured?
FWIW, some of the lists to which I subscribe mung the reply-to header to force replies to go to the list, and some don't -- I'm invariably annoyed by the ones that _do_ mung headers. So take this as a vote NOT to change the behavior of the DSpace lists. My mail user agent is a certifiable antique, but it has simple, separate commands for reply to sender and reply to all. I prefer to have that option, but it goes away if teh Reply-To header forces a reply to the list even when I choose to write only to sender. I suspect we'll see a bunch of inadvertent posts to the whole lists if this gets changed, too. -- Larry - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
[Dspace-tech] dspace backup help
Dear sir where is the default location of postgresql /data? i am using ubuntu 6.06as os help me sir... thanking u -- Shali.K.R Asst.Librarian(Digital) Vidya Academy of Science Technology Thrissur, Kerala. Mob:9847593531,9846303531 - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
