Re: [Orgmode] blorg??
Hello all ML == Matthew Lundin writes: ML Hi Rustom, Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com writes: I have a team of some 4-5 programmers. They've started sending me their reports in org format. I was considering the next step of making them blog rather than use mail for their reports and was wondering if blorg.el is the way to go. (Gather that blorg is not really stable) ML Any current blorg users care to comment? I slightly hacked blorg to allow to use relative links, proper symbols escaping in links, etc. (and i dropped copying of data into directories inside publish). My version is available from http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/common/emacs/blorg.el -- With best wishes, Alex Ott, MBA http://alexott.blogspot.com/http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/ http://alexott-ru.blogspot.com/ ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] DocBook exporter code (version 1.0)
Hello CD == Carsten Dominik writes: CD One of the really weak features in Org's design is that exporting is CD not implemented in a generic way. All exporters share a preprocessing CD step that turns Org format into something a little more sane and CD consistent. Then each exporter goes its own way. This setup makes CD maintenance sort of a nightmare, because each change to Org syntax CD needs to be implemented in all exporters separately. Maybe you have CD read my swearing when I was trying to fix the LaTeX exporter which I CD did not understand completely at first - it was written by Bastien. CD I had really hoped that the next step in exporting Org would be to CD rewrite the exporter from scratch, in a generic way, that will then CD make supporting different formatters more stable and easy. Adding a CD new exporter does not get us closer to that idea. I think, that instead of parsing text directly, we need to write generic exporter, that will export all data as a tree, consisting from header + list of the entries, and inside these entries provide all needed information about text (markup, url information, etc.). And for new export format, author will define only small piece of code -- mostly header generation, and replacement tables for formatting tags, urls decorations, etc. What do you think about this? I can try to define basic API and we'll see what we can do CD And I had feared that your exporter would be a badly hacked attempt CD reinventing lots of wheels, that could never become a really complete CD export. -- With best wishes, Alex Ott, MBA http://alexott.blogspot.com/http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/ http://alexott-ru.blogspot.com/ ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Git recommendations
Re SW == Samuel Wales writes: SW Do you know whether any of the git modes allow you to preprocess the SW files that get diffed or ediffed? in magit you can see diff for separate files SW For example, let's say that you want to ignore all line moves. In SW that case, you might run both files (e.g. an old version and the SW current version) through sort -u. SW Then the diff will look funny if you made a lot of changes, but if you SW only moved lines, it would show up as a zero diff, which is exactly SW what you want if you don't care about line moves. If you made just a SW few changes and a lot of line moves, those changes would show up. A SW more sophisticated algorithm could keep the changed lines in place. SW Likewise, you could preprocess org files to make diffs cleaner by SW eliminating all level changes, etc. SW I have done this in the shell for a long time and found it useful; it SW would be nice in a git mode, if any support that. SW Of course, perhaps it could be done in ediff, somehow. SW I wonder if dvc will win because it has backends. You can look through modes, described in my article at http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/en/writings/emacs-vcs/EmacsGit.html In DVC, as i remember, support for Git is still very basic -- With best wishes, Alex Ott, MBA http://alexott.blogspot.com/ http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/ http://alexott-ru.blogspot.com/ ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] MacOSX: Notifications with Growl
Hi all I wrote small note about show notifications with Growl under Mac OS X. This could be useful when using org-mode. Note is could be found on my site http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/en/writings/EmacsMacOSXAndGrowl.html -- With best wishes, Alex Ott, MBA http://alexott.blogspot.com/ http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/ http://alexott-ru.blogspot.com/ ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] blorg users?
Hello I'm currently started to use blorg, and found some problems with it - for example, improper generation of relative links - for example, [[../bla-bla-bla][description]] is turned into http://my-url/:../bla-bla-bla - may be you know this problem? P.S. is any mailing list for blorg users, or better to discuss all issues in org-mode list? -- With best wishes, Alex Ott, MBA http://alexott.blogspot.com/ http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/ http://alexott-ru.blogspot.com/ ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
