Re: [Emc-users] LiveCD update

2007-11-18 Thread Miroslav Pejic
Thanks, Alex
Regards,
Miroslav

On 11/17/07, Alex Joni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Miroslav,

 that's even less. I'd say it's realistic to expect about 25-30.000 pulses
 /
 second from emc2 without majour problems.

 Regarding trapezoidal profile, it does it properly if you set the right
 acceleration values.
 S-curve profiles haven't been implemented yet.

 Regards,
 Alex

 - Original Message -
 From: Miroslav Pejic
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
 Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 9:53 PM
 Subject: Re: [Emc-users] LiveCD update


 HI MATT,
 MY BIG MISTAKE!
 IT ISN'T 600 BUT 60 PULSES IN 75 MILISECONDS
 REGARDS,
 MIROSLAV


 On 11/17/07, Matthew Glenn Shaver  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 18:47 +0100, Miroslav Pejic wrote:
  Hi Alex,
  I'm about to use emc2 to drive my embroidery multihead machine. But,
  I'm  not shure about speed. Embroidery machine runs at 400 rpm.That
  means Emc2 must generate up to 600 pulses in 75 miliseconds, at two
  independent paralell port lines, and with acceleration and
  decceleration phases, trapesoidal (or S-curve shape if possible).
  After this is 75 miliseconds pause for preparing next pulse
  generation.
 
  Question is: is this possible ?

 600 pulses / 75 milliseconds = 8 pulses/millisecond, or 8000 pulses per
 second.

 This should be no problem at all!

 Matt



 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
 Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users






 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
 Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/



 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users




 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.0/1135 - Release Date:
 11/16/2007
 10:58 PM


 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
 Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] LiveCD update

2007-11-17 Thread Miroslav Pejic
Hi Alex,
I'm about to use emc2 to drive my embroidery multihead machine. But, I'm
 not shure about speed. Embroidery machine runs at 400 rpm.That means Emc2
must generate up to 600 pulses in 75 miliseconds, at two independent
paralell port lines, and with acceleration and decceleration phases,
trapesoidal (or S-curve shape if possible). After this is 75 miliseconds
pause for preparing next pulse generation.

Question is: is this possible ?

Best regards,
Miroslav

On 11/15/07, Alex Joni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello all,

 just wanted to let you all know that I updated the LiveCD found at
 www.linuxcnc.org.
 It now features emc2.2.1 along with all ubuntu updates (up to last night).

 This is the encouraged method for new installs. It is not meant as a
 method
 for upgrades !!

 The necessary steps for upgrading emc2 are described in the wiki:
 Updating emc2: http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?UpdatingTo2.2
 Updating configurations:
 http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?UPDATING

 If you don't have an internet connection on your PC, then simply
 downloading
 the latest emc2 package (found at:

 http://www.linuxcnc.org/emc2/dists/dapper/emc2.2/binary-i386/emc2_2.2.1_i386.deb
 )
 on another computer, moving it over (via USB stick, CD, or whatever), and
 installing it (by clicking in the GUI, or by using sudo dpkg -i
 emc2_2.2.1_i386.dev at the command line) should be enough.

 Best regards,
 Alex

 PS: please report problems with the a.m. livecd, if there are any


 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
 Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
 Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
 Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] LiveCD update

2007-11-17 Thread Matthew Glenn Shaver
On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 18:47 +0100, Miroslav Pejic wrote:
 Hi Alex,
 I'm about to use emc2 to drive my embroidery multihead machine. But,
 I'm  not shure about speed. Embroidery machine runs at 400 rpm.That
 means Emc2 must generate up to 600 pulses in 75 miliseconds, at two
 independent paralell port lines, and with acceleration and
 decceleration phases, trapesoidal (or S-curve shape if possible).
 After this is 75 miliseconds pause for preparing next pulse
 generation. 
 
 Question is: is this possible ?

600 pulses / 75 milliseconds = 8 pulses/millisecond, or 8000 pulses per
second.

This should be no problem at all!

Matt



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] LiveCD update

2007-11-17 Thread Miroslav Pejic
HI MATT,
MY BIG MISTAKE!
IT ISN'T 600 BUT 60 PULSES IN 75 MILISECONDS
REGARDS,
MIROSLAV

On 11/17/07, Matthew Glenn Shaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 18:47 +0100, Miroslav Pejic wrote:
  Hi Alex,
  I'm about to use emc2 to drive my embroidery multihead machine. But,
  I'm  not shure about speed. Embroidery machine runs at 400 rpm.That
  means Emc2 must generate up to 600 pulses in 75 miliseconds, at two
  independent paralell port lines, and with acceleration and
  decceleration phases, trapesoidal (or S-curve shape if possible).
  After this is 75 miliseconds pause for preparing next pulse
  generation.
 
  Question is: is this possible ?

 600 pulses / 75 milliseconds = 8 pulses/millisecond, or 8000 pulses per
 second.

 This should be no problem at all!

 Matt



 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
 Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] LiveCD update

2007-11-17 Thread Alex Joni
Hi Miroslav,

that's even less. I'd say it's realistic to expect about 25-30.000 pulses / 
second from emc2 without majour problems.

Regarding trapezoidal profile, it does it properly if you set the right 
acceleration values.
S-curve profiles haven't been implemented yet.

Regards,
Alex

- Original Message - 
From: Miroslav Pejic
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] LiveCD update


HI MATT,
MY BIG MISTAKE!
IT ISN'T 600 BUT 60 PULSES IN 75 MILISECONDS
REGARDS,
MIROSLAV


On 11/17/07, Matthew Glenn Shaver  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 18:47 +0100, Miroslav Pejic wrote:
 Hi Alex,
 I'm about to use emc2 to drive my embroidery multihead machine. But,
 I'm  not shure about speed. Embroidery machine runs at 400 rpm.That
 means Emc2 must generate up to 600 pulses in 75 miliseconds, at two
 independent paralell port lines, and with acceleration and
 decceleration phases, trapesoidal (or S-curve shape if possible).
 After this is 75 miliseconds pause for preparing next pulse
 generation.

 Question is: is this possible ?

600 pulses / 75 milliseconds = 8 pulses/millisecond, or 8000 pulses per
second.

This should be no problem at all!

Matt



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users






-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.0/1135 - Release Date: 11/16/2007 
10:58 PM 


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users