Re: [Eug-lug] Google Docs

2011-06-01 Thread abrown
I like zoho.  We have adopted it.  Thank you for pointing me to it.
-- 
Allen Brown  http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/
  Predictions are hard to make, especially about the future.
--- Niels Bohr, Nobel Physicist


- Original Message -
From: marbux mar...@gmail.com
To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:08:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Google Docs

Hi, Allen,

I was a typographer for 20-some years before a midlife career change,
so keeping an eye on the state of the art is a hobby.

I think it important that before deciding on a solution, you determine
what format(s) will be required by the folks who do the final
typographical production work. Do you plan to self-publish? Will
others need to process the work in editable form before publication?
If so, what formats are they equipped to work with for a work of the
type? Will the book be printed, online, or both? Do you need to pass
your work on to others for refinement and need only deliver copy that
can be rekeyboarded and digital photos for insertion?

There are free and inexpensive desktop publishing systems, but when
you add the need for collaboration in their use, I know of no
solutions other than expensive proprietary software. E.g., solutions
for publishing businesses with staff who need to collaborate such as
newspapers and magazines.

There are also free and inexpensive single user systems that can
achieve very high quality typography. But as with the high end
publishing solutions, there is a fairly steep learning curve that you
may not wish to traverse to do it yourself. High quality typography
requires far more than the ability to issue commands to a computer. It
also requires intangibles such as a keenly honed sense of aesthetics,
what is possible with a system, and deep experience in its use.

So you need be concerned with what the final formats have to be as
well as any intermediary formats the data must pass through before it
reaches the final format. Then you can determine what collaboration
ware is compatible.

If the work produced by the collaboration can be passed to the next
app in the processing chain in .ODT, .DOC, .DOCX, or .RTF format, then
I suggest that you spend some time playing with the Zoho service for
the collaborative portion of the work. http://www.zoho.com/.

Zoho has collaboration features much more advanced and mature than
Google Docs. And Zoho Writer is way out in front of Google Docs in
typographical (and other) features. Zoho is Google's major competitor
in terms of market share for the type of apps included in Google Docs.
It's a company based in India that from the git-go has been far more
aggressive than Google in rolling out new integrated apps and in
adding features to their apps. Most of their apps are scriptable,
sharing a common scripting language, so a single script can manipulate
multiple apps.

That isn't to suggest that either company's apps are suitable for the
polishing phase. But if the listed formats can get you to the app that
does the polishing, Zoho has a superior collaboration solution with
more capabilities.

It's my favored service for collaborative editing. First gig of
storage free, $3 per user per month for the next increment. Signing up
separately, each of you would have a gig of storage and and can invite
the others to collaborate on a document-by-document basis for docs
stored in each account.

Questions don't go unanswered in their Help forums. They've got staff
who make sure of that.

Hope this helps,

Paul
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Google Docs

2011-06-01 Thread marbux
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:45 AM,  abr...@peak.org wrote:
 I like zoho.  We have adopted it.  Thank you for pointing me to it.

You're welcome, Allen. I hope it works out well for you.

Best regards,

Paul
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Google Docs light bulbs

2011-05-27 Thread Horst

From: abr...@peak.org abr...@peak.org
Allen Brown  abrown at peak.org  http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/
  Q: How many astronomers does it take to replace a light bulb?
  A: One---The astronomer holds the bulb while the galaxy rotates.


That only works if the light bulb gets replaced at the center of the galaxy.
Unfortunately, that's also where we expect a Black Hole -- so no one would be 
able to tell the difference between a broken and a working light bulb )-:


Have a great wkend...Horst

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Google Docs

2011-05-26 Thread marbux
Hi, Allen,

I was a typographer for 20-some years before a midlife career change,
so keeping an eye on the state of the art is a hobby.

I think it important that before deciding on a solution, you determine
what format(s) will be required by the folks who do the final
typographical production work. Do you plan to self-publish? Will
others need to process the work in editable form before publication?
If so, what formats are they equipped to work with for a work of the
type? Will the book be printed, online, or both? Do you need to pass
your work on to others for refinement and need only deliver copy that
can be rekeyboarded and digital photos for insertion?

There are free and inexpensive desktop publishing systems, but when
you add the need for collaboration in their use, I know of no
solutions other than expensive proprietary software. E.g., solutions
for publishing businesses with staff who need to collaborate such as
newspapers and magazines.

There are also free and inexpensive single user systems that can
achieve very high quality typography. But as with the high end
publishing solutions, there is a fairly steep learning curve that you
may not wish to traverse to do it yourself. High quality typography
requires far more than the ability to issue commands to a computer. It
also requires intangibles such as a keenly honed sense of aesthetics,
what is possible with a system, and deep experience in its use.

So you need be concerned with what the final formats have to be as
well as any intermediary formats the data must pass through before it
reaches the final format. Then you can determine what collaboration
ware is compatible.

If the work produced by the collaboration can be passed to the next
app in the processing chain in .ODT, .DOC, .DOCX, or .RTF format, then
I suggest that you spend some time playing with the Zoho service for
the collaborative portion of the work. http://www.zoho.com/.

Zoho has collaboration features much more advanced and mature than
Google Docs. And Zoho Writer is way out in front of Google Docs in
typographical (and other) features. Zoho is Google's major competitor
in terms of market share for the type of apps included in Google Docs.
It's a company based in India that from the git-go has been far more
aggressive than Google in rolling out new integrated apps and in
adding features to their apps. Most of their apps are scriptable,
sharing a common scripting language, so a single script can manipulate
multiple apps.

That isn't to suggest that either company's apps are suitable for the
polishing phase. But if the listed formats can get you to the app that
does the polishing, Zoho has a superior collaboration solution with
more capabilities.

It's my favored service for collaborative editing. First gig of
storage free, $3 per user per month for the next increment. Signing up
separately, each of you would have a gig of storage and and can invite
the others to collaborate on a document-by-document basis for docs
stored in each account.

Questions don't go unanswered in their Help forums. They've got staff
who make sure of that.

Hope this helps,

Paul
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Google Docs

2011-05-26 Thread JS Kaplan
If you do a presentation in Google Docs, Power Point for example, you
can use images.

As long as you trust your collaborators, you may make the links private
to a degree in each document's sharing settings. It can be very bulky,
but a nice way to exclude information is to have a global doc with
semi-external links depending on content and who you wish to view/edit.

--Kaplan

On 5/25/2011 5:41 PM, Allen Brown wrote:
 I have been asked to write a book.  It will be heavy on photos.
 It will be a collaboration with each of us in different
 states or different countries.

 I asked a couple of techie friends what they would recommend.
 The response was to check Google Docs first.  If that wouldn't
 work maybe a wiki would work.

 Today a couple of us started playing with Google Docs.  For
 text it looks promising.  But neither of us could insert a
 photo.

 Since the photos are the main value of the book, I don't
 want them in a public place on the web.  They should either
 be browsed on the local computer or they should be somehow
 protected from reading.

 Do any of you know how to get photos into Google Docs?
 Or are we approaching this all wrong?

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Google Docs

2011-05-26 Thread Ben Barrett
So, a few questions:
1. Do you require real-time collaboration?
2. Is obscurity enough security for your images (and document as a whole)?
2a.  Could you use screen-quality image versions for the composition of the
work, and swap in print-quality ones later?
3. Does your solution need to be cheap-or-free?

-Ben


On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:10 AM, JS Kaplan kg...@hotmail.com wrote:

  I forgot, uploading a PDF also gets you images with Google Docs. For
 example, here's our local ham radio club newsletter:


 https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=vpid=explorerchrome=truesrcid=0B4g_J4lkPJMWMjhhMDY1ZTAtOTg4MS00ODkwLTgxNjctYWRhYmE1YjIyNjlmhl=en_US

 --Kaplan

 *Melita! domi adsum.
 Honey! I'm home.
 *Henry Beard, *Latin for All 
 Occasions*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_for_all_Occasions
 .





 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Google Docs

2011-05-26 Thread abrown
Thank you.  I will take a look.

Another problem I ran into with Google Docs was the user agreement.
Specifically section 11.1 where it says they have permanent
irrevocable rights to publish my works.  We decided that was a
deal killer.

I admit I'm a bit hazy on the formatting requirements.  I asked
on this and it sounded like they could work with pretty much
anything.  I anticipate some surprises.  But for now I figure
the important thing is to get the content assembled.  If the
formatting is a little amateurish it won't really offend me.
The publishing will be done in Ukraine and will be about Ukraine.
The writing will be in Ukrainian and English.
-- 
Allen Brown  abrown at peak.org  http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/
  Q: How many astronomers does it take to replace a light bulb?
  A: One---The astronomer holds the bulb while the galaxy rotates.


- Original Message -
From: marbux mar...@gmail.com
To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:08:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Google Docs

Hi, Allen,

I was a typographer for 20-some years before a midlife career change,
so keeping an eye on the state of the art is a hobby.

I think it important that before deciding on a solution, you determine
what format(s) will be required by the folks who do the final
typographical production work. Do you plan to self-publish? Will
others need to process the work in editable form before publication?
If so, what formats are they equipped to work with for a work of the
type? Will the book be printed, online, or both? Do you need to pass
your work on to others for refinement and need only deliver copy that
can be rekeyboarded and digital photos for insertion?

There are free and inexpensive desktop publishing systems, but when
you add the need for collaboration in their use, I know of no
solutions other than expensive proprietary software. E.g., solutions
for publishing businesses with staff who need to collaborate such as
newspapers and magazines.

There are also free and inexpensive single user systems that can
achieve very high quality typography. But as with the high end
publishing solutions, there is a fairly steep learning curve that you
may not wish to traverse to do it yourself. High quality typography
requires far more than the ability to issue commands to a computer. It
also requires intangibles such as a keenly honed sense of aesthetics,
what is possible with a system, and deep experience in its use.

So you need be concerned with what the final formats have to be as
well as any intermediary formats the data must pass through before it
reaches the final format. Then you can determine what collaboration
ware is compatible.

If the work produced by the collaboration can be passed to the next
app in the processing chain in .ODT, .DOC, .DOCX, or .RTF format, then
I suggest that you spend some time playing with the Zoho service for
the collaborative portion of the work. http://www.zoho.com/.

Zoho has collaboration features much more advanced and mature than
Google Docs. And Zoho Writer is way out in front of Google Docs in
typographical (and other) features. Zoho is Google's major competitor
in terms of market share for the type of apps included in Google Docs.
It's a company based in India that from the git-go has been far more
aggressive than Google in rolling out new integrated apps and in
adding features to their apps. Most of their apps are scriptable,
sharing a common scripting language, so a single script can manipulate
multiple apps.

That isn't to suggest that either company's apps are suitable for the
polishing phase. But if the listed formats can get you to the app that
does the polishing, Zoho has a superior collaboration solution with
more capabilities.

It's my favored service for collaborative editing. First gig of
storage free, $3 per user per month for the next increment. Signing up
separately, each of you would have a gig of storage and and can invite
the others to collaborate on a document-by-document basis for docs
stored in each account.

Questions don't go unanswered in their Help forums. They've got staff
who make sure of that.

Hope this helps,

Paul
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Google Docs

2011-05-26 Thread abrown
- Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com wrote:
 So, a few questions:
 1. Do you require real-time collaboration?

I don't think so.

 2. Is obscurity enough security for your images (and document as a
 whole)?

I think so.

 2a. Could you use screen-quality image versions for the composition of
 the work, and swap in print-quality ones later?

Sort of.  That would be a good way to solve some of the problems.
For instance the photos would be less valuable to someone stealing
my work that way.  But I don't know if my collaborators are
sophisticated enough to handle this complication.

 3. Does your solution need to be cheap-or-free?
 
 -Ben

Yes.  This is a no profit job.
-- 
Allen Brown  abrown at peak.org  http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/
  If you ate pasta and antipasti, would you still be hungry? --- George Carlin


 On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:10 AM, JS Kaplan  kg...@hotmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 
 
 I forgot, uploading a PDF also gets you images with Google Docs. For
 example, here's our local ham radio club newsletter:
 
 https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=vpid=explorerchrome=truesrcid=0B4g_J4lkPJMWMjhhMDY1ZTAtOTg4MS00ODkwLTgxNjctYWRhYmE1YjIyNjlmhl=en_US
 
 --Kaplan
 
 Melita! domi adsum.
 Honey! I'm home.
 Henry Beard, Latin for All Occasions .
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
 
 
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Google Docs

2011-05-25 Thread Fred James
Allen Brown wrote:
 I have been asked to write a book.  It will be heavy on photos.
 It will be a collaboration with each of us in different
 states or different countries.

 I asked a couple of techie friends what they would recommend.
 The response was to check Google Docs first.  If that wouldn't
 work maybe a wiki would work.

 Today a couple of us started playing with Google Docs.  For
 text it looks promising.  But neither of us could insert a
 photo.

 Since the photos are the main value of the book, I don't
 want them in a public place on the web.  They should either
 be browsed on the local computer or they should be somehow
 protected from reading.

 Do any of you know how to get photos into Google Docs?
 Or are we approaching this all wrong?
   
Allen Brown
While I have a (free, as in no cost) google account which allows access 
to google docs, I have not used it for anything other than Youtube videos.

However, I just looked at the docs portion of the product and viewed the 
8 demo vidoes (see link to videos at ...
https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin?service=writelypassive=1209600continue=http://docs.google.com/followup=http://docs.google.com/ltmpl=homepage
... hope that helps ... what it seems to be suggesting is that you have 
to have an account and upload your files to be able to insert them.  
Correct me if I am wrong there ... thanks
Regards
Fred James


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Google Docs

2011-05-25 Thread Tim Bolz
I would recommend LYX.  I know it's not google docs.  But if your
planning on writing a book It looks like it would do a terrific job.
I have played around with it and I like what you can do with it.  I
don't know if it is collaborative though.  I like the fact you can do
dvi,pdf,or ps files.  So you can see what it looks like in book
format.  Also if you do any editing with footnotes they get the page
numbers correct.  Other Processors seem to mess thing up.
Type something up and copy and paste into LYX and then click on the
pdf.  I was really impressed.  The nice thing it is open source too.
Easy to use as most Word Processors.  Read the Introduction in the
Help link on LYX it will explain what it can do.

Tim

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Allen Brown abr...@peak.org wrote:
 I have been asked to write a book.  It will be heavy on photos.
 It will be a collaboration with each of us in different
 states or different countries.

 I asked a couple of techie friends what they would recommend.
 The response was to check Google Docs first.  If that wouldn't
 work maybe a wiki would work.

 Today a couple of us started playing with Google Docs.  For
 text it looks promising.  But neither of us could insert a
 photo.

 Since the photos are the main value of the book, I don't
 want them in a public place on the web.  They should either
 be browsed on the local computer or they should be somehow
 protected from reading.

 Do any of you know how to get photos into Google Docs?
 Or are we approaching this all wrong?
 --
 Allen Brown  abrown at peak.org  http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/
   Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small,
   large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and
   good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently
   overwhelming might of the enemy. --- Sir Winston Churchill

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug