Re: [expert] LG Drive and VMWare

2003-11-17 Thread Mark Watts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


 On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 09:20, Kwan Lowe wrote:
   On Saturday 15 Nov 2003 2:57 pm, Kwan Lowe wrote:
   Any idea if the LG Firmware bug will bite if the Mandrake 9.2
   install is in a virtual VMware machine?
  
   Sorry for the delay in answering - I've been away.
  
   I don't know the answer, but I wouldn't take the risk.  LG now have a
   firmware update available on their site.  Install that first and you
   should be OK.  HTH

 Given that VMWare allows direct hardware access I would go with Anne 216
 days is a lot to lose yes, but your going to lose it anyway when you
 consider that you'll have to replace the drive.  Console yourself in
 this one.  The current record is 4.6 years and climbing.  (A FreeBSD
 box.) So although it's nice.  We pale in comparison. (I just took down
 one with 192 days uptime.  Kernel upgrade.)

$ uptime
  2:44pm  up 154 days,  2:54,  2 users,  load average: 0.24, 0.05, 0.02

This is from a (Mdk 8.2) box thats already hit the 497 day Jiffie wrap 
limit...


- -- 
Mark Watts
Senior Systems Engineer
QinetiQ TIM
St Andrews Road, Malvern
GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/uNhhBn4EFUVUIO0RAs7gAJ9qeSsLznqDhysEu3rHHP3liJaWiACgkcbJ
Wi7BdM8Sp1IwueG0bq0Hho8=
=7R7l
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] LG Drive and VMWare

2003-11-17 Thread Eric Huff
 $ uptime
   2:44pm  up 154 days,  2:54,  2 users,  load average: 0.24, 0.05,
   0.02
 
 This is from a (Mdk 8.2) box thats already hit the 497 day Jiffie
 wrap limit...

Wat's that?


-- 
Mandrake HowTo's  More:  http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] LG Drive and VMWare

2003-11-17 Thread James Sparenberg
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 08:18, Eric Huff wrote:
  $ uptime
2:44pm  up 154 days,  2:54,  2 users,  load average: 0.24, 0.05,
0.02
  
  This is from a (Mdk 8.2) box thats already hit the 497 day Jiffie
  wrap limit...
 
 Wat's that?
 

Older Linux's have been recently discovered to count uptime to 497 days
then using a new form of math 497 + 1 = 0 .   I'm not sure but I think
it has something to do with a Honeywell emulation layer. (For those who
don't know Honeywell(IFRC) mainframes had both -0 and +0, and although
-0 = +0, (0-1) != (-0+1)  go figure)  

James
  


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] LG Drive and VMWare

2003-11-17 Thread KevinO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Mark Watts wrote:
 $ uptime
   2:44pm  up 154 days,  2:54,  2 users,  load average: 0.24, 0.05, 0.02

 This is from a (Mdk 8.2) box thats already hit the 497 day Jiffie wrap
 limit...


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:02pm-kevin uptime
  1:02pm  up 331 days, 18:01,  7 users,  load average: 0.28, 0.29, 0.26

A Mdk 7.0 box, and it has done the jiffy-wrap also (829 days total)
- --
KevinO

AMAZING BUT TRUE ... If all the salmon caught in Canada in one year were laid
end to end across the Sahara Desert, the smell would be absolutely awful.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/uSngWOfRC7Rnmv8RAuWMAJ92Zh65K2TAZz5Xg8wzVby/1ddyUwCfbDn7
pLa8S0c3A1QPQP/lN0seO48=
=EM7q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] LG Drive and VMWare

2003-11-17 Thread Richard Urwin
On Monday 17 Nov 2003 6:17 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
 Older Linux's have been recently discovered to count uptime to 497 days
 then using a new form of math 497 + 1 = 0 .   I'm not sure but I think
 it has something to do with a Honeywell emulation layer. (For those who
 don't know Honeywell(IFRC) mainframes had both -0 and +0, and although
 -0 = +0, (0-1) != (-0+1)  go figure)

One's complement arithmetic. To negate a number you just invert all the bits.
So zero is represented as both 111...111 and 000...000.
These days we use two's complement, where to negate a number you invert all 
the bits and add one. There's only one zero, but an extra negative number 
that doesn't have a positive representation: 100...000.
So the range of an eight bit signed number is -128 to +127.
In eight bit two's complement arithmetic -(-128) = -128 go figure ;-)

Of course, that doesn't anything to do with it though. A simple count of 100Hz 
ticks would fill an unsigned 32 bit integer in 497 days, 2 hours, 27 minutes, 
52.96 seconds.
After which it would wrap around to zero.

Interestingly enough Windows 95 had almost exactly the same situation, but 
since they counted at 1000Hz, it triggered after only 49.7 days. The result 
was a little worse too: the machine crashed. Strangely enough this bug was 
not discovered until the year 2000.

-- 
Richard Urwin

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] LG Drive and VMWare

2003-11-17 Thread Eric Huff
 Of course, that doesn't anything to do with it though. A simple
 count of 100Hz ticks would fill an unsigned 32 bit integer in 497
 days, 2 hours, 27 minutes, 52.96 seconds.
 After which it would wrap around to zero.
 
 Interestingly enough Windows 95 had almost exactly the same
 situation, but since they counted at 1000Hz, it triggered after
 only 49.7 days. The result was a little worse too: the machine
 crashed. Strangely enough this bug was not discovered until the
 year 2000.

That is doubly funny:

1. Windows is so far from real time, why would they bother counting
in ms

2. It took years for any windows 95 machine to last that long w/o
rebooting!


-- 
Mandrake HowTo's  More:  http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] LG Drive and VMWare

2003-11-16 Thread Anne Wilson
On Saturday 15 Nov 2003 2:57 pm, Kwan Lowe wrote:
 Any idea if the LG Firmware bug will bite if the Mandrake 9.2
 install is in a virtual VMware machine?

Sorry for the delay in answering - I've been away.

I don't know the answer, but I wouldn't take the risk.  LG now have a 
firmware update available on their site.  Install that first and you 
should be OK.  HTH

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] LG Drive and VMWare

2003-11-16 Thread Kwan Lowe

 On Saturday 15 Nov 2003 2:57 pm, Kwan Lowe wrote:
 Any idea if the LG Firmware bug will bite if the Mandrake 9.2
 install is in a virtual VMware machine?

 Sorry for the delay in answering - I've been away.

 I don't know the answer, but I wouldn't take the risk.  LG now have a
 firmware update available on their site.  Install that first and you
 should be OK.  HTH


Thanks, Anne.
I bit the bullet and downed the host machine shortly afterwards. It was
one of those laziness things :D  Plus I had to walk someone through the
process without any idea of what the firmwate update screen read... Then
there was the 216 day uptime :(

On a side note, the setup on this remote site is pretty interesting. The
DNS and web server run completely inside a VMWare session. Complete system
backups are as simple as copying a file. Testing is a breeze since I can
test identical systems without bringing the main one down.

-- 
The Digital Hermit  Unix and Linux Solutions
http://www.digitalhermit.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] LG Drive and VMWare

2003-11-16 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 09:20, Kwan Lowe wrote:
  On Saturday 15 Nov 2003 2:57 pm, Kwan Lowe wrote:
  Any idea if the LG Firmware bug will bite if the Mandrake 9.2
  install is in a virtual VMware machine?
 
  Sorry for the delay in answering - I've been away.
 
  I don't know the answer, but I wouldn't take the risk.  LG now have a
  firmware update available on their site.  Install that first and you
  should be OK.  HTH

Given that VMWare allows direct hardware access I would go with Anne 216
days is a lot to lose yes, but your going to lose it anyway when you
consider that you'll have to replace the drive.  Console yourself in
this one.  The current record is 4.6 years and climbing.  (A FreeBSD
box.) So although it's nice.  We pale in comparison. (I just took down
one with 192 days uptime.  Kernel upgrade.) 

James

 
 
 Thanks, Anne.
 I bit the bullet and downed the host machine shortly afterwards. It was
 one of those laziness things :D  Plus I had to walk someone through the
 process without any idea of what the firmwate update screen read... Then
 there was the 216 day uptime :(
 
 On a side note, the setup on this remote site is pretty interesting. The
 DNS and web server run completely inside a VMWare session. Complete system
 backups are as simple as copying a file. Testing is a breeze since I can
 test identical systems without bringing the main one down.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com