Re: [Fab-user] Why is the version that's available on pypi only at 0.1.1?
Jeff Forcier wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Heikki Toivonen > wrote: > >> It seems like the last version before current (1.7.5) that is available >> on PyPI is 1.7.2 (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/paramiko/1.7.2). So maybe >> you could write the dependency something like: >> >> "Paramiko >= 1.7.2, != 1.7.5" > > Interesting, how'd you find that, just modifying the URL? I tried > every search I could find on there and only ever found 1.7.5. Short story: just tried older release numbers on the URL. Long story: A while back I was interested in finding how popular Python packages were (http://www.heikkitoivonen.net/blog/2008/10/23/python-package-popularity-contest/). I noticed that when I install packages with easy_install, it uses a simple version of PyPI to find and parse stuff (http://pypi.python.org/simple/). If you go to http://pypi.python.org/simple/paramiko/ you can actually confirm that there is 1.7.5 and 1.7.2 but nothing in between. And lots of older releases. -- Heikki Toivonen signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Fab-user mailing list Fab-user@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
Re: [Fab-user] Why is the version that's available on pypi only at 0.1.1?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Heikki Toivonen wrote: > It seems like the last version before current (1.7.5) that is available > on PyPI is 1.7.2 (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/paramiko/1.7.2). So maybe > you could write the dependency something like: > > "Paramiko >= 1.7.2, != 1.7.5" Interesting, how'd you find that, just modifying the URL? I tried every search I could find on there and only ever found 1.7.5. Unfortunately, I seem to recall versions prior to 1.7.4 also having occasional bugs. Will have to scour the fab-user archives since that's where I recall seeing that mentioned. If I can't find that or they look on the benign side, yea, this might be a good stopgap. Thanks! (@Taras: Yea, Fab 0.9b1 and the work since then that will become 0.9.0 final, should be reasonably stable. Certainly enough to go public. I was mostly just wanting to get the docs in shape, and only recently had the time to really ramp that up.) -Jeff ___ Fab-user mailing list Fab-user@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
Re: [Fab-user] Why is the version that's available on pypi only at 0.1.1?
Jeff Forcier wrote: > One major problem regardless is that Paramiko (our main dependency) > has a serious bug in its latest version, and the previous version > isn't on PyPI. So automatic easy_install of Fab is not recommended, It seems like the last version before current (1.7.5) that is available on PyPI is 1.7.2 (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/paramiko/1.7.2). So maybe you could write the dependency something like: "Paramiko >= 1.7.2, != 1.7.5" -- Heikki Toivonen signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Fab-user mailing list Fab-user@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
Re: [Fab-user] Why is the version that's available on pypi only at 0.1.1?
I haven't had any issues, but I might have been lucky. I'll wait for resolution on this. Good luck with the go live. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Jeff Forcier wrote: > Hi Taras, > > I've been avoiding putting up a non-release version because I just > didn't want anything up that wasn't "finished". However, as soon as > the docs I'm nearly done expanding are done, and I've spent a few > hours testing out the setup.py on a few different platforms, I plan on > pushing this out of the nest anyway. Very sick of dragging my feet. > > Hopefully it'll be this coming weekend if I'm not working. (major > client site launch tomorrow. fun.) > > One major problem regardless is that Paramiko (our main dependency) > has a serious bug in its latest version, and the previous version > isn't on PyPI. So automatic easy_install of Fab is not recommended, > and I may even have the setup.py reflect this. See the red warnings in > the docs: > > http://docs.fabfile.org/0.9/installation.html > > I'm mulling over whether to try and "fix" this by including a Paramiko > checkout in Fabric's source tree, but will probably save that decision > for a point release or something :( It's a bad situation but I still > want to get some sort of official release out. > > Best, > Jeff > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Taras Mankovski wrote: >> Hey Guys, >> >> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Fabric/0.1.1 >> >> I'm sure there is a good reason for this, but it would be great to >> include fabric in my buildouts. Current, I have to use the tarball >> installation instead of just installing it as an egg. >> >> It would be great to even have 0.9b available up there. >> >> Thank you, >> Taras >> >> >> ___ >> Fab-user mailing list >> Fab-user@nongnu.org >> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user >> > ___ Fab-user mailing list Fab-user@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
Re: [Fab-user] Why is the version that's available on pypi only at 0.1.1?
Hi Taras, I've been avoiding putting up a non-release version because I just didn't want anything up that wasn't "finished". However, as soon as the docs I'm nearly done expanding are done, and I've spent a few hours testing out the setup.py on a few different platforms, I plan on pushing this out of the nest anyway. Very sick of dragging my feet. Hopefully it'll be this coming weekend if I'm not working. (major client site launch tomorrow. fun.) One major problem regardless is that Paramiko (our main dependency) has a serious bug in its latest version, and the previous version isn't on PyPI. So automatic easy_install of Fab is not recommended, and I may even have the setup.py reflect this. See the red warnings in the docs: http://docs.fabfile.org/0.9/installation.html I'm mulling over whether to try and "fix" this by including a Paramiko checkout in Fabric's source tree, but will probably save that decision for a point release or something :( It's a bad situation but I still want to get some sort of official release out. Best, Jeff On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Taras Mankovski wrote: > Hey Guys, > > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Fabric/0.1.1 > > I'm sure there is a good reason for this, but it would be great to > include fabric in my buildouts. Current, I have to use the tarball > installation instead of just installing it as an egg. > > It would be great to even have 0.9b available up there. > > Thank you, > Taras > > > ___ > Fab-user mailing list > Fab-user@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user > ___ Fab-user mailing list Fab-user@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
