[Fink-users] leopard 10.5.7 fink update-all can't resolve dependency
Hello, For a few days I can't upgrade my fink installation on intel macs. The fink update-all command always answers: Information about 8449 packages read in 0 seconds. Can't resolve dependency libtasn1-3-shlibs (= 2.2-2) for package gnome-keyring-2.26.1-1 (no matching packages/versions found) Exiting with failure. I've tried to rebuild the index to apt-get update and upgrade to selfupdate-cvs but I cannot fix the problem. Any suggestion ? Thanks for your help, Regards, B. Martin -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] leopard 10.5.7 fink update-all can't resolve dependency
On 12/06/2009, at 08:20, Alexander Hansen wrote: bruno.mar...@unice.fr wrote: Hello, For a few days I can't upgrade my fink installation on intel macs. The fink update-all command always answers: Information about 8449 packages read in 0 seconds. Can't resolve dependency libtasn1-3-shlibs (= 2.2-2) for package gnome-keyring-2.26.1-1 (no matching packages/versions found) Exiting with failure. I've tried to rebuild the index to apt-get update and upgrade to selfupdate-cvs but I cannot fix the problem. Any suggestion ? Thanks for your help, Regards, B. Martin Keep trying: this version of libtasn1-3-shlibs was added to the distribution, but it looks like there was a lag in getting it to the anonymous cvs server--and that's from where the rsync mirrors pick up packages. Salut. Also, please check your Trees: configuration option in /sw/etc/ fink.conf. There should be two unstable entries there: unstable/main and unstable/crypto, such as Trees: local/main stable/main stable/crypto unstable/main unstable/ crypto gnome-keyring-2.26.1-1 is in unstable/main; libtasn1-3-shlibs-2.2-2 is in unstable/crypto. If you have run fink configure to enable the unstable tree then Fink should have set Trees: correctly in /sw/etc/ fink.conf; we have had situations where people manually edited that file and forgot to add unstable/crypto. Cheers, -- monipol -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] leopard 10.5.7 fink update-all can't resolve dependency
Hi again, Yes ! The unstable/crypto was missing in my tree. Thanks for your help. Regards, Bruno Le 12 juin 09 à 13:27, Monic Polynomial a écrit : On 12/06/2009, at 08:20, Alexander Hansen wrote: bruno.mar...@unice.fr wrote: Hello, For a few days I can't upgrade my fink installation on intel macs. The fink update-all command always answers: Information about 8449 packages read in 0 seconds. Can't resolve dependency libtasn1-3-shlibs (= 2.2-2) for package gnome-keyring-2.26.1-1 (no matching packages/versions found) Exiting with failure. I've tried to rebuild the index to apt-get update and upgrade to selfupdate-cvs but I cannot fix the problem. Any suggestion ? Thanks for your help, Regards, B. Martin Keep trying: this version of libtasn1-3-shlibs was added to the distribution, but it looks like there was a lag in getting it to the anonymous cvs server--and that's from where the rsync mirrors pick up packages. Salut. Also, please check your Trees: configuration option in /sw/ etc/fink.conf. There should be two unstable entries there: unstable/ main and unstable/crypto, such as Trees: local/main stable/main stable/crypto unstable/main unstable/ crypto gnome-keyring-2.26.1-1 is in unstable/main; libtasn1-3-shlibs-2.2-2 is in unstable/crypto. If you have run fink configure to enable the unstable tree then Fink should have set Trees: correctly in /sw/etc/ fink.conf; we have had situations where people manually edited that file and forgot to add unstable/crypto. Cheers, -- monipol -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] build ocaml: File odoc_ast.ml, line 335, characters 38-3043: syntax error
Brendan Cully wrote: On Wednesday, 10 June 2009 at 09:07, Alexander Hansen wrote: Richard Kettlewell wrote: Brendan Cully wrote: On Tuesday, 09 June 2009 at 20:33, Richard Kettlewell wrote: File odoc_ast.ml, line 335, characters 38-3043: Error: Syntax error It appears to be 'sed' that is the culprit. I tried a rebuild and got the same error. I then removed Fink's sed and the rebuild worked. Thanks for tracking this down. It should be fixed now. Works for me. Thanks! ttfn/rjk -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] can't install pyorbit2-py25-dev-2.14.3-1
I'm trying to update my packages. I ran a selfupdate a couple days ago and ran into the gtk+2 problem. After upgrading Xcode to the latest release, I got past that, but now I get errors on pyorbit2-py25-dev-2.14.3-1. I've run a selfupdate again, and then update-all a few times the past couple days. It keeps failing on the same package with a conflicting packages message. I think I've captured the relevant portion below[1]. Any suggestions? Thanks, Nick [1] Partial output from 'sudo fink update-all': dpkg: regarding .../pyorbit2-py25-dev_2.14.3-1_darwin-i386.deb containing pyorbit2-py25-dev: pyorbit2-py26-dev conflicts with pyorbit2-py25-dev pyorbit2-py25-dev (version 2.14.3-1) is to be installed. /sw/bin/dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/gnome/pyorbit2-py25-dev_2.14.3-1_darwin-i386.deb (--install): conflicting packages - not installing pyorbit2-py25-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/gnome/pyorbit2-py25-dev_2.14.3-1_darwin-i386.deb ### execution of /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 1 -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] can't install pyorbit2-py25-dev-2.14.3-1
On 12/06/2009, at 19:24, Nick Hasser wrote: (...) [1] Partial output from 'sudo fink update-all': dpkg: regarding .../pyorbit2-py25-dev_2.14.3-1_darwin-i386.deb containing pyorbit2-py25-dev: pyorbit2-py26-dev conflicts with pyorbit2-py25-dev pyorbit2-py25-dev (version 2.14.3-1) is to be installed. /sw/bin/dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/gnome/pyorbit2-py25- dev_2.14.3-1_darwin-i386.deb (--install): conflicting packages - not installing pyorbit2-py25-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/gnome/pyorbit2-py25- dev_2.14.3-1_darwin-i386.deb ### execution of /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 1 Only one of pyorbit2-py25-dev and pyorbit2-py26-dev can be installed at any given time. As update-all is trying to install pyorbit2-py25- dev, try removing pyorbit2-py26-dev before running update-all: fink remove pyorbit2-py26-dev fink update-all -- monipol -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] OT: Sanity check
Purely out of curiosity, are there any general impressions about fink on Snow Leopard? Will fink (and the packages) benefit at all from Grand Central Dispatch and OpenCL? I assume that the latter will have no effect, but the former should, theoretically, benefit fink and its packages, right? Will all this software port relatively easily over to Snow Leopard? Payam -- Payam Minoofar, Ph.D. Scientist Meissner Filtration Products 4181 Calle Tesoro Camarillo, CA 93012 USA +1 805 388 9911 +1 805 388 5948 fax payam.minoo...@meissner.com -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] OT: Sanity check
Those of us who are working with fink on Snow Leopard in advance of its release are not allowed to comment on the specifics of Snow Leopard, but I can make some general comments based on publically- available information. Everything I've heard publically about Grand Central Dispatch indicates that programmers will have to specifically include that functionality in their code -- they will have to adopt Apple's new threading model. This suggests that existing code (such as the code for all packages currently in fink) won't immediately take advantage of Grand Central Dispatch, but that GCD might, over time, have some beneficial effects. The other comment that I think it's safe to make is that fink is working quite well on Snow Leopard already, and we hope to have a well- functioning version of fink all ready to go when Snow Leopard is released. -- Dave On Jun 12, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Payam Minoofar wrote: Purely out of curiosity, are there any general impressions about fink on Snow Leopard? Will fink (and the packages) benefit at all from Grand Central Dispatch and OpenCL? I assume that the latter will have no effect, but the former should, theoretically, benefit fink and its packages, right? Will all this software port relatively easily over to Snow Leopard? Payam -- Payam Minoofar, Ph.D. Scientist Meissner Filtration Products 4181 Calle Tesoro Camarillo, CA 93012 USA +1 805 388 9911 +1 805 388 5948 fax payam.minoo...@meissner.com -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] OT: Sanity check
This is great to know! It will be so wonderful if the transition were to be smoother than the one from Tiger to Leopard. Thank you very much. Can you comment on whether S Leopard truly outperforms Leopard? Payam On 6/12/09 4:45 PM, David R. Morrison d...@finkproject.org wrote: Those of us who are working with fink on Snow Leopard in advance of its release are not allowed to comment on the specifics of Snow Leopard, but I can make some general comments based on publically-available information. Everything I've heard publically about Grand Central Dispatch indicates that programmers will have to specifically include that functionality in their code -- they will have to adopt Apple's new threading model. This suggests that existing code (such as the code for all packages currently in fink) won't immediately take advantage of Grand Central Dispatch, but that GCD might, over time, have some beneficial effects. The other comment that I think it's safe to make is that fink is working quite well on Snow Leopard already, and we hope to have a well-functioning version of fink all ready to go when Snow Leopard is released. -- Dave On Jun 12, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Payam Minoofar wrote: Purely out of curiosity, are there any general impressions about fink on Snow Leopard? Will fink (and the packages) benefit at all from Grand Central Dispatch and OpenCL? I assume that the latter will have no effect, but the former should, theoretically, benefit fink and its packages, right? Will all this software port relatively easily over to Snow Leopard? Payam -- Payam Minoofar, Ph.D. Scientist Meissner Filtration Products 4181 Calle Tesoro Camarillo, CA 93012 USA +1 805 388 9911 +1 805 388 5948 fax payam.minoo...@meissner.com x-msg://33/payam.minoo...@meissner.com -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
