Legal straw man (Lott, Edward))

2013-05-10 Thread Ed. Lott
Question ( 11 a.) on ATF Form 4473 (Firearms Transaction Record Part 
I - Over-the-Counter) says:


Are you the actual transferee/buyer of the firearm(s) listed on this 
form? (YES or NO) Warning: You are not the actual buyer if you are 
acquiring the firearm(s) on behalf of another person. If you are not 
the actual buyer, the dealer cannot transfer the firearm(s) to you. 
(See instructions for question 11. a.) 


The instructions for question 11. a. say:

Actual Transferee/Buyer: For purposes of this form, you are the 
actual transferee/buyer if you are purchasing thwe firearm for 
yourself or otherwise acquiring the firearm for yourself. (e.g., 
redeeming the firearm from pawn/retrieving it from consignment, 
firearm raffle winner). You are also the actual transferee/buyer if 
you are legitimately purchasing the firearm as a gift for a third 
party. ACTUAL TRANSFEREE/BUYER EXAMPLES: Mr. Smith asks Mr. Jones to 
purchase a firearm for Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith gives Mr. Jones the money 
for the firearm. Mr. Jones is NOT THE ACTUAL TRANSFEREE/BUYER of the 
firearm and must answer NO to question 11. a. The licensee may not 
transfer the firearm to Mr. Jones. However if Mr. Brown goes to buy a 
firearm with his own money to give to Mr. Black as a present, Mr. 
Brown is the actual transferee/buyer of the firearm and should answer 
YES to question 11. a. However you may not transfer a firearm to 
any person that you know or have reason to believe is prohibited 
under U.S.C. 18 (g), (n), or (x).


-

From the above I draw the following conclusions:

1.  You CAN buy a firearm for yourself (providing you are not a 
prohibited person)


2.  You CAN buy a firearm as a GIFT for anyone (wife, husband, 
friend) as long as the recipient is not a prohibited person.


3.  You CAN NOT take money from another person to buy a firearm 
for that person.


4.  Prohibited persons are defined by U.S.C. 18 (g), (n), or (x).

Although not directly from the above; a Straw Purchase of a firearm 
is the purchase of a firearm by a person who meets the legal 
requirements to purchase a firearm; who gives or sells that firearm 
to a prohibited person as defined by U.S.C. 18 (g), (n), or (x).


Ed. Lott


___
To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Re: Legal straw man (Lott, Edward))

2013-05-10 Thread Olson, Joseph E.
In the example we have been using, the financier is *NEVER* the actual
transferee/buyer because HE never takes possession of the gun or fills out
a Form 4473.  Only the intended transferee does that.  The gun goes from
selling transferor's/owner (to seller's FFL, if one is used) to
transferee's FFL *then* to the TRUE transferee/buyer.  The
finder/financier is not in the chain of transfers.

Seller's FFL (if used) books the gun out *to* the buyer's FFL.  Perfectly
legal.  Otherwise the owner/transferee ships it directly to the
buyer/transferee's FFL -- also a perfectly legal transaction.  Buyer's FFL
books the gun *into HIS inventory* (Bound Book).  *Then* he books it out *to
* the ACTUAL transferee/buyer.  *Not to the finder/financier.*  Prefectly
legal.

The financier is at best a finder OOH and a banker OTOH.  All records are
accurate.

This is not the hypothethical transaction that the Q and A was written for
but it fits.



On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ed. Lott e...@lott.com wrote:

  *Question ( 11 a.) on ATF Form 4473 (Firearms Transaction Record Part I
 - Over-the-Counter) says:

 *Are you the actual transferee/buyer of the firearm(s) listed on this
 form? (YES or NO) Warning: You are not the actual buyer if you are
 acquiring the firearm(s) on behalf of another person. If you are not the
 actual buyer, the dealer cannot transfer the firearm(s) to you. (See
 instructions for question 11. a.) 

 *The instructions for question 11. a. say:

 *Actual Transferee/Buyer: For purposes of this form, you are the actual
 transferee/buyer if you are purchasing thwe firearm for yourself or
 otherwise acquiring the firearm for yourself. (e.g., redeeming the firearm
 from pawn/retrieving it from consignment, firearm raffle winner). You are
 also the actual transferee/buyer if you are legitimately purchasing the
 firearm as a gift for a third party. ACTUAL TRANSFEREE/BUYER EXAMPLES: Mr.
 Smith asks Mr. Jones to purchase a firearm for Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith gives
 Mr. Jones the money for the firearm. Mr. Jones is NOT THE ACTUAL
 TRANSFEREE/BUYER of the firearm and must answer NO to question 11. a. The
 licensee may not transfer the firearm to Mr. Jones. However if Mr. Brown
 goes to buy a firearm with his own money to give to Mr. Black as a present,
 Mr. Brown is the actual transferee/buyer of the firearm and should answer
 YES to question 11. a. However you may not transfer a firearm to any
 person that you know or have reason to believe is prohibited under U.S.C.
 18 (g), (n), or (x).

 -

 *From the above I draw the following conclusions:

 *1. ** **You CAN buy a firearm for yourself (providing you are not a
 prohibited person)

 2.**  **You CAN buy a firearm as a GIFT for anyone (wife, husband,
 friend) as long as the recipient is not a prohibited person.

 3.**  **You CAN NOT take money from another person to buy a firearm
 for that person.

 4.**  **Prohibited persons are defined by U.S.C. 18 (g), (n), or (x).

 Although not directly from the above; a Straw Purchase of a firearm is
 the purchase of a firearm by a person who meets the legal requirements to
 purchase a firearm; who gives or sells that firearm to a prohibited person
 as defined by U.S.C. 18 (g), (n), or (x).

 Ed. Lott



 ___
 To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
 http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

 Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
 private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
 posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
 wrongly) forward the messages to others.




-- 
**
Professor Joseph Olson, J.D.(*Hon*. Duke), LL.M.(*Tax*. Florida)
   o651-523-2142
Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037)
f 651-523-2236
St. Paul, MN  55113-1235
 c612-865-7956
jol...@hamliine.edu
http://law.hamline.edu/constitutional_law/joseph_olson.html
___
To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Legal straw man

2013-05-08 Thread Greg Jacobs

Since Tom is a legal purchaser in his state, this is an example of a
perfectly legal straw man purchase. So there is anti-gun Big Lie
number #3, that all straw man purchases are illegal.

Methinks there is an opportunity here for an OAQ (occasionally asked
questions, or oak): anti-gun Big Lies and the truth.

The key to that is the definition of purchase versus taking delivery.  If 
you walk into a gun shop with your spouse, parent, sibling, friend, or child 
(of legal age, of course) and give the shop money for the purchase of a 
firearm but the other person with you takes delivery and fills out the Form 
4473, and is the subject of the NICS check, nothing illegal happened.  It's a 
straw purchase only with respect to the person who delivered the cash.  That's 
a far cry from you delivering the cash AND completing the forms (upon which you 
would have to lie in this instance), getting the NICS check, and then handing 
the weapon over to someone else in violation of the law and the Form 4473.  BIG 
difference.

***GRJ***
___
To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.


Re: Legal straw man

2013-05-08 Thread Olson, Joseph E.
*What you describe is NOT a strawman purchase at all as top anyone.*

The strawman refers to using another person to *deceive* the dealer and THE
GOVERNMENT by making the fake appear as the transferee to the dealer and to
the government so that the NICS check is run on the fakeer and the
paperwork shows a transfer to the faker.

The government is concerned that the person who fills out the ATF Form 4473
and undergoes the NICS check is the actual buyer/transferee of the
firearm.  That is, the person takes and holds possession if the gun.  The
government is *not* concerned with the financing, absent fraud, of the
transaction.




On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Greg Jacobs grjtw...@earthlink.net wrote:


 Since Tom is a legal purchaser in his state, this is an example of a
 perfectly legal straw man purchase. So there is anti-gun Big Lie
 number #3, that all straw man purchases are illegal.
 
 Methinks there is an opportunity here for an OAQ (occasionally asked
 questions, or oak): anti-gun Big Lies and the truth.

 The key to that is the definition of purchase versus taking delivery.
  If you walk into a gun shop with your spouse, parent, sibling, friend, or
 child (of legal age, of course) and give the shop money for the purchase
 of a firearm but the other person with you takes delivery and fills out
 the Form 4473, and is the subject of the NICS check, nothing illegal
 happened.  It's a straw purchase only with respect to the person who
 delivered the cash.  That's a far cry from you delivering the cash AND
 completing the forms (upon which you would have to lie in this instance),
 getting the NICS check, and then handing the weapon over to someone else in
 violation of the law and the Form 4473.  BIG difference.

 ***GRJ***
 ___
 To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
 http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

 Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
 private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
 posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
 wrongly) forward the messages to others.




-- 
**
Professor Joseph Olson, J.D.(*Hon*. Duke), LL.M.(*Tax*. Florida)
   o651-523-2142
Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037)
f 651-523-2236
St. Paul, MN  55113-1235
 c612-865-7956
jol...@hamliine.edu
http://law.hamline.edu/constitutional_law/joseph_olson.html
___
To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Re: Legal straw man

2013-05-08 Thread Greg Jacobs
Thanks, Professor. That was kind of what I meant. "Strawman" in the ATF context has taken on a different meaning than the one we read about in Contracts 101.***GRJ***-Original Message-
From: "Olson, Joseph E." <jol...@hamline.edu>
Sent: May 8, 2013 2:14 PM
To: Greg Jacobs <grjtw...@earthlink.net>
Cc: "Firearms Reg, List" <firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu>
Subject: Re: Legal straw man

*What you describe is NOT a "strawman" purchase at all as top anyone.*The strawman refers to using another person to *deceive* the dealer and THEGOVERNMENT by making the fake appear as the transferee to the dealer and tothe government so that the NICS check is run on the fakeer and thepaperwork shows a transfer to the faker.The government is concerned that the person who fills out the ATF Form 4473and undergoes the NICS check is the "actual buyer/transferee" of thefirearm.  That is, the person takes and holds possession if the gun.  Thegovernment is *not* concerned with the financing, absent fraud, of thetransaction.On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Greg Jacobs <grjtw...@earthlink.net> wrote: Since Tom is a legal purchaser in his state, this is an example of a perfectly legal "straw man" purchase. So there is anti-gun Big Lie number #3, that all straw man purchases are illegal.  Methinks there is an opportunity here for an OAQ ("occasionally asked questions", or "oak"): anti-gun Big Lies and the truth. The key to that is the definition of "purchase" versus "taking delivery".  If you walk into a gun shop with your spouse, parent, sibling, friend, or child (of legal age, of course) and give the shop money for the "purchase" of a firearm but the other person with you "takes delivery" and fills out the Form 4473, and is the subject of the NICS check, nothing illegal happened.  It's a straw purchase only with respect to the person who delivered the cash.  That's a far cry from you delivering the cash AND completing the forms (upon which you would have to lie in this instance), getting the NICS check, and then handing the weapon over to someone else in violation of the law and the Form 4473.  BIG difference. ***GRJ*** ___ To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.-- **Professor Joseph Olson, J.D.(*Hon*. Duke), LL.M.(*Tax*. Florida)   o651-523-2142Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037)f 651-523-2236St. Paul, MN  55113-1235 c612-865-7956jol...@hamliine.eduhttp://law.hamline.edu/constitutional_law/joseph_olson.html
___
To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.