Re: [Flightgear-devel] Garmin 400

2009-01-20 Thread Martin Spott
Curtis Olson wrote:

 It would be great if it was possible to drive the windows based 400-series
 simulator software, but I don't have any idea if it's setup to respond to
 serial input.  My understanding is that it had a graphics front end combined
 with a backend engine that communicated via network packets.  But I could be
 wrong.

Last time I checked, several years ago, the simulator/trainer had a
'serial' config option which should allow the user to hook this onto
everything that is getting declared a being a serial interface by the
underlying OS.
Therefore, with a small to medium amount of fancywork it _should_ be
possible to route FlightGear's serial output into a serial interface in
Wine.

Cheers,
Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Could not open file: Segmentation fault;

2009-01-20 Thread Jon S. Berndt
 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.net
 wrote:
  Hi Csaba,
 
  The patch you're proposing indeed saves us/me from the segfault due
 to
  a file not being present - which is definitely a good start.
 
 That was all I intended. If a file is missing it is a broken airplane
 config, the best we can do is exit gracefully.
 
 --
 Csaba/Jester


The C310 is one of the aircraft that - in the JSBSim cvs repository - is
used for extensive testing of JSBSim operation. There is a need for an
autopilot for the aircraft to be able to fly out the tests. The autopilot
file is expected to be found in the same directory as the C310.xml file.
However, at this time, there has been no work to hook up the autopilot
commands in FlightGear to the relevant capabilities in the JSBSim C310, the
way it stands in our CVS repository. So, the expected procedure would be to
comment out or delete the relevant lines in the C310.xml file before issuing
it to the FlightGear CVS repository. Then, the C310 would be controlled by
the well-established FlightGear a/p and there would be no confusion. I
should have commented out the few lines in the C310 config file that should
be removed prior to placing it in a FlightGear release.

Removing (commenting out using !-- ... --) the reference to the
autopilot /autopilot element is a good start, and then subsequently
commenting out any reference to properties that are named with an ap/
prefix should finish the job. These properties are defined in the autopilot
file that has been commented out.

Eventually, I think there will be a more graceful handling of this
situation, which may include leaving in a full-featured a/p capability that
is compatible with flightgear needs, and which would provide an alternative
a/p if desired, but ignored if not referenced.

Jon

Jon S. Berndt
Development Coordinator
JSBSim Project
www.JSBSim.org 



--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] Proxy APP / SDK

2009-01-20 Thread Hernan Martinez
Hi.I am new to this mail list.
I've read some of the mail archives and saw some ideias of making a proxy
app.
I want to know if that is currently possible. I want to write an external
application that gets the 6-DOF information from the aircraft.

Is there a way of doing that without the need to compile the whole
FlightGear code and put it inside my own software code?

Thanks
Hernan Martinez
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Could not open file: Segmentation fault;

2009-01-20 Thread Martin Spott
Csaba Halász wrote:

 That was all I intended. If a file is missing it is a broken airplane
 config, the best we can do is exit gracefully.

Ok, thanks,
Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] stabilizing the _repeat_ function in 3D pick animation

2009-01-20 Thread John Denker

Here's a simple patch to give a slightly delayed start to the _repeat_ 
function for mouse events in the new 3D pick animation.  This gives
the conventional behavior, expected of all user interfaces ... and
not coincidentally, this how the good old 2D panel does it.

To say the same thing the other way, without this patch the repeatable
feature on 3D panels is unusable in practice.  Instrument designers
have been turning off the repeatable feature, which seems like a
step in the wrong direction.  It would be better to make it work
properly, so they don't need to turn it off.

--- a/simgear/scene/model/animation.cxx
+++ b/simgear/scene/model/animation.cxx
@@ -1986,7 +1986,7 @@ public:
 SGBindingList::const_iterator i;
 for (i = _bindingsDown.begin(); i != _bindingsDown.end(); ++i)
   (*i)-fire();
-_repeatTime = 0;
+_repeatTime = -_repeatInterval;
 return true;
   }
   virtual void buttonReleased(void)



--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Terrain errors report

2009-01-20 Thread gerard robin
On samedi 17 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
 Brian Schack wrote:
  There are several huge and very unnatural walls in the Himalayas, both
  running NS and EW.  I'll give the line of latitude or longitude that
  the wall runs along, and the end coordinates of the walls:

 The underlying SRTM elevation data is known to have many voids in the
 Himalayan area and a reasonable explanation _might_ be that the void
 filling in TerraGear doesn't provide too realistic results.
 For your own experience, you'll find a copy of the respective elevation
 raster here as a geo-referenced 1x1 degree TIFF image:

  
 ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/GIS/GISData/SRTM/version2/GeoTIFF/Eurasia/N28
E083.tif

 Note that these images have a 16-bit grayscale channel, therefore
 simple visual debugging on a typical PC screen might be quite tricky
 due to limited colour depth. In order to get a better clue about the
 reported errors I'd consider it as being highly desirable looking at a
 similar error at a place which is located at a much lower elevation.

 Cheers,
   Martin.
Because of some reason i mostly do use the old FG 0.9.8  scenery
I have flown over Himalaya mountains looking for hole, wall or flat part , 
nothing.  :)  only mountains  :)

here snapshots of the Everest
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/f16-everest_1.jpg
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/f16-everest_2.jpg

So older data were right.

Cheers
-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/

J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. 
Voltaire


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Terrain errors report

2009-01-20 Thread Martin Spott
gerard robin wrote:

 So older data were right.

I wonder how you managed to draw a conclusion even before the error has
been identified properly,

Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Terrain errors report

2009-01-20 Thread gerard robin
On mardi 20 janvier 2009, gerard robin wrote:
 On samedi 17 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
  Brian Schack wrote:
   There are several huge and very unnatural walls in the Himalayas, both
   running NS and EW.  I'll give the line of latitude or longitude that
   the wall runs along, and the end coordinates of the walls:
 
  The underlying SRTM elevation data is known to have many voids in the
  Himalayan area and a reasonable explanation _might_ be that the void
  filling in TerraGear doesn't provide too realistic results.
  For your own experience, you'll find a copy of the respective elevation
  raster here as a geo-referenced 1x1 degree TIFF image:
 
 
  ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/GIS/GISData/SRTM/version2/GeoTIFF/Eurasia/N
 28 E083.tif
 
  Note that these images have a 16-bit grayscale channel, therefore
  simple visual debugging on a typical PC screen might be quite tricky
  due to limited colour depth. In order to get a better clue about the
  reported errors I'd consider it as being highly desirable looking at a
  similar error at a place which is located at a much lower elevation.
 
  Cheers,
  Martin.

 Because of some reason i mostly do use the old FG 0.9.8  scenery
 I have flown over Himalaya mountains looking for hole, wall or flat part ,
 nothing.  :)  only mountains  :)

 here snapshots of the Everest
 http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/f16-everest_1.jpg
 http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/f16-everest_2.jpg

 So older data were right.

 Cheers

In addition, the map of that area which was done with atlas
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/e086n27.png
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/e086n28.png
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/e087n27.png
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/e087n28.png

-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/

J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. 
Voltaire


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Terrain errors report

2009-01-20 Thread gerard robin
On mardi 20 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
 gerard robin wrote:
  So older data were right.

 I wonder how you managed to draw a conclusion even before the error has
 been identified properly,

   Martin.

 i only have eye, a computer, and archives

-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/

J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. 
Voltaire


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Terrain errors report

2009-01-20 Thread Martin Spott
Hi Brian,

Brian Schack wrote:

 data (and by the way, much of this is guesswork on my part - if I'm
 labouring under false assumptions, please let me know).  Maneuvering
 to an area in question, I checked 'srtm_elevation' and got ... nothing
 at all.  There is data there - checking 'v0_lake, for example, shows
 lakes, and 'v0_elevcontour' shows contour lines.  But I had always
 thought the FlightGear elevation data was based on SRTM data - am I
 wrong, or am I just using mapserver.flight.org wrong?  What layers
 *are* used when creating FlightGear scenery?

Please see the announcement at:

  http://www.flightgear.org/announce.html#scenery-1.0.1

Indeed, the landuse data is available online via the MapServer site,
the elevation raster apparently is not  :-)

I made several attempts at converting SRTM raster data into elevation
contour lines for nice publishing as well as editing. One of these
attempts has ended up in the 'srtm_elevation' layer on the MapServer -
but only for a small testing area (I don't even remember any more which
area this is ).

To my experience, converting global SRTM raster into contour lines of
reasonable resolution (note: resolution != accuracy) blows the storage
size up by a factor of 100 - 450 (compared to the compressed HGT
imagery), depending on the shape and slope of the terrain. Given the
fact that we're talking about approx. 13 GByte of compressed images,
this would end up in several TByte of contour lines   mostly just
for the sake of nice visualization.
Unless our database server is able to provide the required disk space,
we therefore decided to stick to using the original raster images  :-)

Cheers,
Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Terrain errors report

2009-01-20 Thread Martin Spott
gerard robin wrote:
 On mardi 20 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
  gerard robin wrote:

  I wonder how you managed to draw a conclusion even before the error has
  been identified properly,

  i only have eye, a computer, and archives

So, did you create screenshots from the 1.0.1 Scenery as well as the
0.9.8 Scenery that allow to identify the differences between the two
Scenery releases ?

Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Instrumentation heading_indicator_fg.cxx, 1.5, 1.6

2009-01-20 Thread Torsten Dreyer
That reintroduces the recently fixed division by zero bug when spin is zero...

Instead of calculating 
double factor = 0.1 / (spin * spin * spin * spin * spin * spin)

and later

heading = fgGetLowPass(_last_heading_deg, heading, dt / factor)



avoid division by calculating

double factor = 10 *  (spin * spin * spin * spin * spin * spin)

and later

heading = fgGetLowPass(_last_heading_deg, heading, dt  * factor)

That's what the Csaba fixed in version 1.4

Torsten

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Terrain errors report

2009-01-20 Thread Martin Spott
Brian Schack wrote:

 Given that we have this weirdness in the Himalayas, my first
 inclination is to check the underlying data.  Atlas and FlightGear
 both showed the same problem, so this indicates that the problem is
 not with Atlas or FlightGear, but with the data they use.

FlightGear and Atlas are loading the same Scenery tiles, I guess. So,
either the underlying data is erroneous (we know it is) or the
processing stage is at fault as well. Unless we have a reasonable
analysis of the input data for the 'faulty' Scenery tiles I'd hesitate
to spend too much time on inspecting the raster processing.

Cheers,
Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] Resizable dialog boxes

2009-01-20 Thread Curtis Olson
Hi Melchior,

The resizable dialog boxes are very nice!

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Terrain errors report

2009-01-20 Thread gerard robin
On mardi 20 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
 gerard robin wrote:
  On mardi 20 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
   gerard robin wrote:
  
   I wonder how you managed to draw a conclusion even before the error has
   been identified properly,
 
   i only have eye, a computer, and archives

 So, did you create screenshots from the 1.0.1 Scenery as well as the
 0.9.8 Scenery that allow to identify the differences between the two
 Scenery releases ?

   Martin.

No i did not , since i get some difficulties with the  coastline and islands 
of 1.0.1 . (which explain that i am longer using these old scenery)
However, i could do it, the Himalayan area being longer far from the sea 
side  :)
The best would be to do build the map with the original Atlas map, in order to 
get the right comparison.

-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/

J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. 
Voltaire


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Resizable dialog boxes

2009-01-20 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Curtis Olson -- Tuesday 20 January 2009:
 The resizable dialog boxes are very nice!

Yeah, especially property browser and Nasal console profit
a lot. It's actually a bit embarrassing that we haven't had
that since years, and I take my share of the blame. I had
even started implementing it a few years back, but gave up
early. This time it was Mate KOCH's complaint about the
textbox, where fonts couldn't be changed. I implemented
this and changed the font in the nasal console to a fixed
width font, which is much easier for editing. But the text
was too wide then, so I first added a [+] and [-] button that
would re-open the dialog bigger or smaller. But that didn't
work well, so ...

And that wasn't the end of the story: because line-wrapping
in the nasal console is also bad, I turned that off, only to
notice that the sliders didn't work well, and finally I ended
up rewriting bigger parts of plib. It will soon be recommended
(but not required) to use plib/svn. (Only parts of that are
committed at the moment.)

m.  :-)

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] A special day and a special livery

2009-01-20 Thread Torsten Dreyer
Hi everybody,

this is a very special day, not only for you in the US.
You have a new president, congratulations. Celebrating this event, I have 
created a special livery for my experimental model aircraft DerKleineUhu: 
The UHU-one (Obama edition).

Have a sneak preview here:
http://www.t3r.de/fg/uhu-one_1.jpg
http://www.t3r.de/fg/uhu-one_2.jpg

Enjoy this simple glider and let's make this world a better place!

Torsten

BTW. it has a (very) simple first implementation of a rubber strap launcher in 
nasal using JSBSim external force to launch the glider from the ground.
Just hit Ctrl-w and let'em fly.

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] A special day and a special livery

2009-01-20 Thread francesco
Torsten Dreyer ha scritto:
 Hi everybody,

 this is a very special day, not only for you in the US.

 Have a sneak preview here:
 http://www.t3r.de/fg/uhu-one_1.jpg
 http://www.t3r.de/fg/uhu-one_2.jpg

   
nice one Torsten !!!

since I am happy too about this, I decided to take my personal Cessna
and enjoy the day in my way :-)

http://brisa.homelinux.net/fgfs/obama/fgfs-screen-001.resized.jpg
http://brisa.homelinux.net/fgfs/obama/fgfs-screen-005.resized.jpg
http://brisa.homelinux.net/fgfs/obama/fgfs-screen-009.resized.jpg
http://brisa.homelinux.net/fgfs/obama/fgfs-screen-019.resized.jpg
http://brisa.homelinux.net/fgfs/obama/fgfs-screen-020.resized.jpg

if you want to have fun too with your private c172 
http://brisa.homelinux.net/fgfs/obama/c172p_ac-and-banner.tar.gz

extract and put the files in the Aircraft/c172p/Models folder (Remember
to backup your c172p.ac file first !)

bye

-- 
Brisa Francesco
Via Gabelli 16
22077 Olgiate Comasco (CO)

http://brisa.homelinux.net
france...@brisa.homelinux.net

  __
 / / /   / /___   ___  
/ / __/ /  __   / /   / __ \/ __ `__ \/ __ \
   / /_/ / /___   /_/  / /___/ /_/ / / / / / / /_/ /
   \/_/\/\/_/ /_/ /_/\/

http://www.gl-como.it

My public gpg key:
http://minsky.surfnet.nl:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xC67DC12DC4361693


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] Impressive nasa lunar lander winds up inaurgural parade

2009-01-20 Thread GWMobile
The last item in the inaugural parade was a working electric, 12 
wheeled, six axled, electric lunar rover that including a full glass 
fronted sealed capsule with normally clothed pilots.

The whole rover moved under its own power and demonstrated its ability 
to move in any direction and rotate its axles independently.

In front of the presidental review stand an astronaut in a full space 
suit and pack got off on of the external chairs of the capsule and took 
the flag from the capsule and proceded to join the parade and march down 
the street with rover following behind.

Looks like an exciting vehicle to model in flightgear.


a href=http://truepot.biz/id/141_3_bid_20_em; Legally lower your 
electric meter by cutting out unwanted power spikes with this plugin 
device. Save up to 40%!/a

www.GlobalBoiling.com for daily earth images.

www.ElectricQuakes.com daily sun and earthquake images.


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] A special day and a special livery

2009-01-20 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:27:15 +0100, francesco wrote in message 
497641b3.9050...@brisa.homelinux.net:

 Torsten Dreyer ha scritto:
  Hi everybody,
 
  this is a very special day, not only for you in the US.
 
  Have a sneak preview here:
  http://www.t3r.de/fg/uhu-one_1.jpg
  http://www.t3r.de/fg/uhu-one_2.jpg
 

 nice one Torsten !!!

..aye, these and ...

 since I am happy too about this, I decided to take my personal Cessna
 and enjoy the day in my way :-)
 
 http://brisa.homelinux.net/fgfs/obama/fgfs-screen-001.resized.jpg
 http://brisa.homelinux.net/fgfs/obama/fgfs-screen-005.resized.jpg
 http://brisa.homelinux.net/fgfs/obama/fgfs-screen-009.resized.jpg
 http://brisa.homelinux.net/fgfs/obama/fgfs-screen-019.resized.jpg
 http://brisa.homelinux.net/fgfs/obama/fgfs-screen-020.resized.jpg

...these as splash screens?  ;o)
 
 if you want to have fun too with your private c172 
 http://brisa.homelinux.net/fgfs/obama/c172p_ac-and-banner.tar.gz
 
 extract and put the files in the Aircraft/c172p/Models folder
 (Remember to backup your c172p.ac file first !)

..pretty damn clear Ghandi and I was right about Good Ideas 
like Western Civilization and American Intelligence: ;o)
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/obama-inauguration-windows-xp,6872.html

..thank you and congratulations, all! :o)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Impressive nasa lunar lander winds up inaurgural parade

2009-01-20 Thread Ron Jensen
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 19:05 -0500, GWMobile wrote:
 The last item in the inaugural parade was a working electric, 12 
 wheeled, six axled, electric lunar rover that including a full glass 
 fronted sealed capsule with normally clothed pilots.
 
 The whole rover moved under its own power and demonstrated its ability 
 to move in any direction and rotate its axles independently.
 
 In front of the presidental review stand an astronaut in a full space 
 suit and pack got off on of the external chairs of the capsule and took 
 the flag from the capsule and proceded to join the parade and march down 
 the street with rover following behind.
 
 Looks like an exciting vehicle to model in flightgear.

http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1266.html

http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/home/LER.html





--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel