Re: cvs commit: src/kerberos5/usr.bin Makefile src/kerberos5/usr.bin/k5su Makefile
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 03:18:35AM -0800, Mark Murray wrote: markm 2001/03/05 03:18:35 PST Modified files: kerberos5/usr.binMakefile Added files: kerberos5/usr.bin/k5su Makefile Log: *Sigh*. What I did without this, I have no idea. Will we always have this dichotomy between kblah/k5blah utilities? It is fairly annoying. Anecdotally, there don't seem to be many new Kerberos IV installations, Kerberos V's utilities can get/list/trash version 4 5 tickets. Curious, -- Jacques Vidrine / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: cvs commit: src/kerberos5/usr.bin Makefile src/kerberos5/usr.bin/k5su Makefile
"Jacques A. Vidrine" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Will we always have this dichotomy between kblah/k5blah utilities? It is fairly annoying. Anecdotally, there don't seem to be many new Kerberos IV installations, Kerberos V's utilities can get/list/trash version 4 5 tickets. Yes. My current plan of things to happen (in -current and after 4.3) is to ditch the v4 programs basically and install the v5 ones under the canonical names (with v4-compatibility if compiled in). And to always build and install the krb5 programs/libraries, but ifdef'ing the support in other programs. How does that sounds? /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: cvs commit: src/kerberos5/usr.bin Makefile src/kerberos5/usr.bin/k5su Makefile
Will we always have this dichotomy between kblah/k5blah utilities? It is fairly annoying. Anecdotally, there don't seem to be many new Kerberos IV installations, Kerberos V's utilities can get/list/trash version 4 5 tickets. When all the K5 utils reliably double-up as K4 ones, I'll fix this. (I think we are really close, BTW). M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: cvs commit: src/kerberos5/usr.bin Makefile src/kerberos5/usr.bin/k5su Makefile
"Jacques A. Vidrine" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Will we always have this dichotomy between kblah/k5blah utilities? It is fairly annoying. Anecdotally, there don't seem to be many new Kerberos IV installations, Kerberos V's utilities can get/list/trash version 4 5 tickets. Yes. My current plan of things to happen (in -current and after 4.3) is to ditch the v4 programs basically and install the v5 ones under the canonical names (with v4-compatibility if compiled in). And to always build and install the krb5 programs/libraries, but ifdef'ing the support in other programs. How does that sounds? Wonderful! If you need repo-copying done, I'm your man! -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Re: cvs commit: src/kerberos5/usr.bin Makefile src/kerberos5/usr.bin/k5su Makefile
Gordon Tetlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW, is this still valid? From /etc/defaults/make.conf: # Kerberos 5 # If you want KerberosIV (KTH Heimdal), define this: # ** WARNING ** # ** WARNING ** This is very experimental at this stage. If you # ** WARNING ** need stable Kerberos5, rather use the port(s). # ** WARNING ** # #MAKE_KERBEROS5=yes I don't think so. It's the same version that the port currently, even thought the port builds more programs. I've nuked the warning. /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
