net/isc-dhcp41-server: please bump revision
It looks like the revision has not been bumped after the fix for FreeBSD 10 in isc-dhcpd.in. I had already prepared the following email when I noticed that the installed rc script and the one in the port were different. Subject: net/isc-dhcp42-server: rc script is no freebsd-10 aware Environment: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.e_2,2 Symptom: /etc/rc: WARNING: dhcpd_devfs_enable disabled -- not available /etc/rc: ERROR: unable to copy directory /dev to /var/db/dhcpd/dev Cause: if test `uname -r | cut -c 1` -le 6; then ... -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: net/isc-dhcp41-server: please bump revision
On (11/27/11 14:44), Andriy Gapon wrote: It looks like the revision has not been bumped after the fix for FreeBSD 10 in isc-dhcpd.in. I had already prepared the following email when I noticed that the installed rc script and the one in the port were different. Subject: net/isc-dhcp42-server: rc script is no freebsd-10 aware Environment: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.e_2,2 Symptom: /etc/rc: WARNING: dhcpd_devfs_enable disabled -- not available /etc/rc: ERROR: unable to copy directory /dev to /var/db/dhcpd/dev Cause: if test `uname -r | cut -c 1` -le 6; then ... -- Andriy Gapon I intentionally did not bump PORTREVISION as 10-CURRENT is bleeding edge at this point. Users who were testing it could simply deinstall/reinstall to obtain the updated rc script if they happened to be affected. -r -- Ryan Steinmetz PGP: EF36 D45A 5CA9 28B1 A550 18CD A43C D111 7AD7 FAF2 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: net/isc-dhcp41-server: please bump revision
on 27/11/2011 16:20 Ryan Steinmetz said the following: I intentionally did not bump PORTREVISION as 10-CURRENT is bleeding edge at this point. Sorry, I don't follow the logic. Users who were testing it could simply deinstall/reinstall to obtain the updated rc script if they happened to be affected. Provided they had a chance to notice that what is installed is different from what is in the port. Ditto for package building. -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: net/isc-dhcp41-server: please bump revision
On Sun Nov 27 14:59:31 2011, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 27/11/2011 16:20 Ryan Steinmetz said the following: I intentionally did not bump PORTREVISION as 10-CURRENT is bleeding edge at this point. Sorry, I don't follow the logic. Users who were testing it could simply deinstall/reinstall to obtain the updated rc script if they happened to be affected. Provided they had a chance to notice that what is installed is different from what is in the port. Ditto for package building. 10/Current is supported best as possible, we dont bump ports for the rebuild in that case. Thas was always like that. -- +-oOO--(_)--OOo-+ With best Regards, Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org) Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
