Re: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox
Hi, On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Jim Hallwrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ercan Ersoy wrote: > > I think it would be great for someone to pick up the GNUish project > again. Port the GNU Utilities (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/) to FreeDOS > using OpenWatcom, or DJGPP. This is likely challenging, as it will > require creating wrappers for different functionality, workarounds for > other functionality that doesn't (or can't?) exist on DOS, etc. > > *That* is something that would be really interesting on FreeDOS! We > already have some Unix-like programs in FreeDOS (cal, du, bc, grep, > sed, ...) and a few utilities exist at DJ Delorie's repo, but AFAIK no > one has created a comprehensive update to GNUish. How many POSIX utils do you want? There are many: * http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/idx/utilities.html * http://rubyquiz.com/quiz97.html Yes, DJGPP already has lots of stuff (File-, Text-, ShellUtils ... aka, CoreUtils). Yes, we already have 16-bit ports for many things (sed, awk, grep). I think some stuff is more useful than others. E.g., I'd rather have hexdump than od, for instance. You should try to glean some stuff from old Minix 2.0.4 sources (in C), which have been BSD-licensed for a while now: src/CMD.TAZ - Commands sources (cp, ls, mkdir, etc.) https://minix1.woodhull.com/current/2.0.4/src/CMD.TAZ >From there it should be fairly easy to get some common things working. Or try to borrow from Landley's Toybox (also BSD-licensed): http://landley.net/toybox/ (But I think it's better to be specific and limit yourself on what exactly you will need and actively use.) -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox
The links in the actual page route to simtel.net not http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/gnuish/ On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Jim Hallwrote: > Do you mean the links from my email? > > I just clicked on them again from my phone, and the links work except the > ftp link. My phone doesn't like ftp, I guess. > > > On May 26, 2017 6:31 AM, "Mark Olesen" wrote: > >> I was unsuccessful in finding any links that worked. Am I missing >> something? Did anyone have better luck? >> >> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Steve Nickolas >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 25 May 2017, Jim Hall wrote: >>> >>> Minibox is an interesting project, but I wonder why implement everything in one large binary, just to execute simple commands. I know you are mimicking Busybox (above). But on a DOS system, it seems very resource heavy to load a large exe that requires DPMI to do commands like: (from the README) beep cat cd clear cp date echo ls mkdir mv pwd rm rmdir sh time Wouldn't it be easier and more resource efficient to implement these as small, individual programs? "cat" is not a very big program, for example. >>> >>> This. >>> >>> There's an interesting parallel here, and I think this would make a good project for someone: Years ago, there was the "GNUish" project, which ported the GNU utilities to DOS. But eventually the project stalled. Before GNUish shut down, they reached out to me to mirror their files. You can find them here: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/gnuish/ Info here: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/gnuish/gnuish.htm I think it would be great for someone to pick up the GNUish project again. Port the GNU Utilities (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/) to FreeDOS using OpenWatcom, or DJGPP. This is likely challenging, as it will require creating wrappers for different functionality, workarounds for other functionality that doesn't (or can't?) exist on DOS, etc. *That* is something that would be really interesting on FreeDOS! We already have some Unix-like programs in FreeDOS (cal, du, bc, grep, sed, ...) and a few utilities exist at DJ Delorie's repo, but AFAIK no one has created a comprehensive update to GNUish. >>> >>> I think one of the last updates to GNUish was when I got a wild hair and >>> ported over a then-recent "cpio". That had to be around 2000... >>> >>> I've thought of doing something similar to GNUish using rewritten code >>> and/or BSD code but there's not much stuff that ports over without a lot of >>> rewriting, and back in those days I was a newcomer to C. Maybe I should >>> try again. >>> >>> -uso. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >>> ___ >>> Freedos-devel mailing list >>> Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> ___ >> Freedos-devel mailing list >> Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel >> >> > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox
Thanks for interesting. I would like add abilities to Minibox. But, I don't have much time for this. I would like someone developing. I have cloned in GitHub. GitHub Page: https://github.com/ercanersoy/Minibox Best regards, Ercan -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox
>> I've been writing my own set of UNIX tools for DOS for personal use. >> Would anyone like me to publish these here in their own thread? We have a few Unix-workalike utilities on ibiblio. http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/util/file/ I think over the weekend I'll create a new directory there, so we can collect the Unix-like utilities in one place. Might call this "unix" or "unix-like" or "unixish", probably under http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/util/file/ I'll post a note to the list to let folks know when it's done, and where to find it. Jim -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox
Hi guys, I've been writing my own set of UNIX tools for DOS for personal use. Same here, only for Windows. :-) (Designed with portability in mind.) Would anyone like me to publish these here in their own thread? Yes, please. I realized long ago that the DOS batch syntax is so poor that you can't do anything serious with batch files. But I knew Unix well enough to also realize that inventing my own batch language would fire back if I wanted to make my stuff multi-platform. Thus standard Unix and Unix-syle (but custom) pipe stages are the best solution: batch files will not become 100% shell scripts but, at least, as similar as possible. If so, are there any other commands that would be nice to add to them? I missed a few things from "tr" and it was relatively simple to implement. Joe -- KOVÁCS Balázs aka Joe Forster/STA; s...@c64.rulez.org; http://sta.c64.org Don't E-mail spam, HTML or uncompressed files! More contacts on homepage-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox
I was thinking the same thing. I've been writing my own set of UNIX tools for DOS for personal use. I've written cat, head, wc, and split, and I've made my own implementation of getopt which uses DOS-style flags (begin with '/', use ':' to separate flag from argument) called getswitch. I used WCC specifically for binary size and 16-bit compatibility/efficiency. Would anyone like me to publish these here in their own thread? If so, are there any other commands that would be nice to add to them? Only slightly related, I also wrote a utility for taking a split archive spread across multiple diskettes, reassembling it, and unzipping it at C:\. I made this as a backup utility for DOS games I have in case the original diskettes fail. I can publish that as well if requested. Happy Hacking, David E. McMackins II Associate Member, Free Software Foundation (#12889) Life Member, National Rifle Association of America (#226579338) www.mcmackins.org www.delwink.com www.gnu.org www.fsf.org On 05/25/2017 06:59 PM, Jim Hall wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ercan Ersoywrote: >> >>> But looking at the source commited 20 minutes ago, it seems that no commands >>> are yet implemented, it is only like a stub. >> >> Please read README. Also, Minibox includes commands in one executable file. >> (e.g. Busybox) >> >> Command Line: minibox command [arguments] >> >>> I am curious why it need DPMI and DJGPP for that? It is not enought Watcom >>> C++ >>> in 16 bit real mode? >> >> Because, Minibox porting for other platforms easily. >> > > > Minibox is an interesting project, but I wonder why implement > everything in one large binary, just to execute simple commands. I > know you are mimicking Busybox (above). But on a DOS system, it seems > very resource heavy to load a large exe that requires DPMI to do > commands like: (from the README) > > beep > cat > cd > clear > cp > date > echo > ls > mkdir > mv > pwd > rm > rmdir > sh > time > > > Wouldn't it be easier and more resource efficient to implement these > as small, individual programs? "cat" is not a very big program, for > example. > > -- > > There's an interesting parallel here, and I think this would make a > good project for someone: Years ago, there was the "GNUish" project, > which ported the GNU utilities to DOS. But eventually the project > stalled. Before GNUish shut down, they reached out to me to mirror > their files. You can find them here: > http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/gnuish/ > > Info here: > http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/gnuish/gnuish.htm > > > I think it would be great for someone to pick up the GNUish project > again. Port the GNU Utilities (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/) to FreeDOS > using OpenWatcom, or DJGPP. This is likely challenging, as it will > require creating wrappers for different functionality, workarounds for > other functionality that doesn't (or can't?) exist on DOS, etc. > > *That* is something that would be really interesting on FreeDOS! We > already have some Unix-like programs in FreeDOS (cal, du, bc, grep, > sed, ...) and a few utilities exist at DJ Delorie's repo, but AFAIK no > one has created a comprehensive update to GNUish. > > > Jim > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox
Do you mean the links from my email? I just clicked on them again from my phone, and the links work except the ftp link. My phone doesn't like ftp, I guess. On May 26, 2017 6:31 AM, "Mark Olesen"wrote: > I was unsuccessful in finding any links that worked. Am I missing > something? Did anyone have better luck? > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Steve Nickolas wrote: > >> On Thu, 25 May 2017, Jim Hall wrote: >> >> Minibox is an interesting project, but I wonder why implement >>> everything in one large binary, just to execute simple commands. I >>> know you are mimicking Busybox (above). But on a DOS system, it seems >>> very resource heavy to load a large exe that requires DPMI to do >>> commands like: (from the README) >>> >>> beep >>> cat >>> cd >>> clear >>> cp >>> date >>> echo >>> ls >>> mkdir >>> mv >>> pwd >>> rm >>> rmdir >>> sh >>> time >>> >>> >>> Wouldn't it be easier and more resource efficient to implement these >>> as small, individual programs? "cat" is not a very big program, for >>> example. >>> >> >> This. >> >> There's an interesting parallel here, and I think this would make a >>> good project for someone: Years ago, there was the "GNUish" project, >>> which ported the GNU utilities to DOS. But eventually the project >>> stalled. Before GNUish shut down, they reached out to me to mirror >>> their files. You can find them here: >>> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/gnuish/ >>> >>> Info here: >>> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/gnuish/gnuish.htm >>> >>> >>> I think it would be great for someone to pick up the GNUish project >>> again. Port the GNU Utilities (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/) to FreeDOS >>> using OpenWatcom, or DJGPP. This is likely challenging, as it will >>> require creating wrappers for different functionality, workarounds for >>> other functionality that doesn't (or can't?) exist on DOS, etc. >>> >>> *That* is something that would be really interesting on FreeDOS! We >>> already have some Unix-like programs in FreeDOS (cal, du, bc, grep, >>> sed, ...) and a few utilities exist at DJ Delorie's repo, but AFAIK no >>> one has created a comprehensive update to GNUish. >>> >> >> I think one of the last updates to GNUish was when I got a wild hair and >> ported over a then-recent "cpio". That had to be around 2000... >> >> I've thought of doing something similar to GNUish using rewritten code >> and/or BSD code but there's not much stuff that ports over without a lot of >> rewriting, and back in those days I was a newcomer to C. Maybe I should >> try again. >> >> -uso. >> >> >> >> -- >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> ___ >> Freedos-devel mailing list >> Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel >> > > > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox
I was unsuccessful in finding any links that worked. Am I missing something? Did anyone have better luck? On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Steve Nickolaswrote: > On Thu, 25 May 2017, Jim Hall wrote: > > Minibox is an interesting project, but I wonder why implement >> everything in one large binary, just to execute simple commands. I >> know you are mimicking Busybox (above). But on a DOS system, it seems >> very resource heavy to load a large exe that requires DPMI to do >> commands like: (from the README) >> >> beep >> cat >> cd >> clear >> cp >> date >> echo >> ls >> mkdir >> mv >> pwd >> rm >> rmdir >> sh >> time >> >> >> Wouldn't it be easier and more resource efficient to implement these >> as small, individual programs? "cat" is not a very big program, for >> example. >> > > This. > > There's an interesting parallel here, and I think this would make a >> good project for someone: Years ago, there was the "GNUish" project, >> which ported the GNU utilities to DOS. But eventually the project >> stalled. Before GNUish shut down, they reached out to me to mirror >> their files. You can find them here: >> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/gnuish/ >> >> Info here: >> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/gnuish/gnuish.htm >> >> >> I think it would be great for someone to pick up the GNUish project >> again. Port the GNU Utilities (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/) to FreeDOS >> using OpenWatcom, or DJGPP. This is likely challenging, as it will >> require creating wrappers for different functionality, workarounds for >> other functionality that doesn't (or can't?) exist on DOS, etc. >> >> *That* is something that would be really interesting on FreeDOS! We >> already have some Unix-like programs in FreeDOS (cal, du, bc, grep, >> sed, ...) and a few utilities exist at DJ Delorie's repo, but AFAIK no >> one has created a comprehensive update to GNUish. >> > > I think one of the last updates to GNUish was when I got a wild hair and > ported over a then-recent "cpio". That had to be around 2000... > > I've thought of doing something similar to GNUish using rewritten code > and/or BSD code but there's not much stuff that ports over without a lot of > rewriting, and back in those days I was a newcomer to C. Maybe I should > try again. > > -uso. > > > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox
On Thu, 25 May 2017, Jim Hall wrote: Minibox is an interesting project, but I wonder why implement everything in one large binary, just to execute simple commands. I know you are mimicking Busybox (above). But on a DOS system, it seems very resource heavy to load a large exe that requires DPMI to do commands like: (from the README) beep cat cd clear cp date echo ls mkdir mv pwd rm rmdir sh time Wouldn't it be easier and more resource efficient to implement these as small, individual programs? "cat" is not a very big program, for example. This. There's an interesting parallel here, and I think this would make a good project for someone: Years ago, there was the "GNUish" project, which ported the GNU utilities to DOS. But eventually the project stalled. Before GNUish shut down, they reached out to me to mirror their files. You can find them here: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/gnuish/ Info here: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/gnuish/gnuish.htm I think it would be great for someone to pick up the GNUish project again. Port the GNU Utilities (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/) to FreeDOS using OpenWatcom, or DJGPP. This is likely challenging, as it will require creating wrappers for different functionality, workarounds for other functionality that doesn't (or can't?) exist on DOS, etc. *That* is something that would be really interesting on FreeDOS! We already have some Unix-like programs in FreeDOS (cal, du, bc, grep, sed, ...) and a few utilities exist at DJ Delorie's repo, but AFAIK no one has created a comprehensive update to GNUish. I think one of the last updates to GNUish was when I got a wild hair and ported over a then-recent "cpio". That had to be around 2000... I've thought of doing something similar to GNUish using rewritten code and/or BSD code but there's not much stuff that ports over without a lot of rewriting, and back in those days I was a newcomer to C. Maybe I should try again. -uso. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox
On 5/25/2017 4:59 PM, Jim Hall wrote: > > Minibox is an interesting project, but I wonder why implement > everything in one large binary, just to execute simple commands. I > know you are mimicking Busybox (above). But on a DOS system, it seems > very resource heavy to load a large exe that requires DPMI to do > commands like: (from the README) Well, no offense to the OP, but I think this is one clear example that people these days don't understand (anymore) what DOS is and how it works, and instead treat it as a second coming of Linux... :-( Ralf --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ercan Ersoywrote: > > > But looking at the source commited 20 minutes ago, it seems that no commands > > are yet implemented, it is only like a stub. > > Please read README. Also, Minibox includes commands in one executable file. > (e.g. Busybox) > > Command Line: minibox command [arguments] > > > I am curious why it need DPMI and DJGPP for that? It is not enought Watcom > > C++ > > in 16 bit real mode? > > Because, Minibox porting for other platforms easily. > Minibox is an interesting project, but I wonder why implement everything in one large binary, just to execute simple commands. I know you are mimicking Busybox (above). But on a DOS system, it seems very resource heavy to load a large exe that requires DPMI to do commands like: (from the README) beep cat cd clear cp date echo ls mkdir mv pwd rm rmdir sh time Wouldn't it be easier and more resource efficient to implement these as small, individual programs? "cat" is not a very big program, for example. -- There's an interesting parallel here, and I think this would make a good project for someone: Years ago, there was the "GNUish" project, which ported the GNU utilities to DOS. But eventually the project stalled. Before GNUish shut down, they reached out to me to mirror their files. You can find them here: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/gnuish/ Info here: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/gnuish/gnuish.htm I think it would be great for someone to pick up the GNUish project again. Port the GNU Utilities (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/) to FreeDOS using OpenWatcom, or DJGPP. This is likely challenging, as it will require creating wrappers for different functionality, workarounds for other functionality that doesn't (or can't?) exist on DOS, etc. *That* is something that would be really interesting on FreeDOS! We already have some Unix-like programs in FreeDOS (cal, du, bc, grep, sed, ...) and a few utilities exist at DJ Delorie's repo, but AFAIK no one has created a comprehensive update to GNUish. Jim -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox
> But looking at the source commited 20 minutes ago, it seems that no commands > are yet implemented, it is only like a stub. Please read README. Also, Minibox includes commands in one executable file. (e.g. Busybox) Command Line: minibox command [arguments] > I am curious why it need DPMI and DJGPP for that? It is not enought Watcom > C++ > in 16 bit real mode? Because, Minibox porting for other platforms easily. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
Re: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox
Thanks. But looking at the source commited 20 minutes ago, it seems that no commands are yet implemented, it is only like a stub. I am curious why it need DPMI and DJGPP for that? It is not enought Watcom C++ in 16 bit real mode? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:Ercan Ersoy <ercaner...@outlook.com> Destinatario: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Fecha:jueves, 25 de mayo de 2017, 15:25:28 Asunto: [Freedos-devel] Linux commands in DOS - Minibox Archivos: --===-- Hello. I have developed another program for FreeDOS. This program is Minibox. Minibox provides some Linux commands for DOS. Source code compiles by DJGPP. I suggest compressing this for UPX. Minibox requires DPMI. Website: https://gitlab.com/ercanersoy/Minibox Best regards, Ercan -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel