Re: FVWM: spelling of fvwm vs. Fvwm vs. FVWM

2007-08-10 Thread Thomas Adam
On 10/08/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I think you have no idea of the extend of my efforts to keep
 naming consistent in the source tree.

Oh, I can well imagine it's a lot of work.  But it's really only the
documentation that would need changing if anything since:

* Having a binary name all in capitals (a la FVWM) is ludicrous -- and
goes against the grain for every other naming convention I've
seen.  (At best, *some* applications start with a capital letter, but
even that's rare).

* The naming is currently inconsistent anyway, since you have:
FvwmButtons -- if *you* wanted it consistent you'd have stuck with
fvwmbuttons from the outset to denote module names.  But it's fine, I
quite like the camelcase naming for modules.  :)

 And I'm happy if you *don't* do it just in context.  I've spent
 many hours to have consistent spelling all over the place.

You can have your toys back, of course.  Even if I do still go ahead
and change the *documentation* I know you're not going to be happy
about it.  I don't want to anger you either, so I'll drop it.  It's a
shame.

Should this resurface sometime again in the future, my offer is still open.

-- Thomas Adam



Re: FVWM: spelling of fvwm vs. Fvwm vs. FVWM

2007-08-10 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:07:12PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
 On 09/08/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I think opinions have been exchanged by now.  So, who of the
  people who promote FVWM as fvwm's name is willing to do the
  following:
 
* Rename *all* occurences in *all* files in the fvwm and
  fvwm-web repositories from fvwm or Fvwm to FVWM,
  Excluding symbolic names in the source files.
 
 I am more than happy to.
 
* This includes
 
  - The name of the CVS repositories (FVWM and FVWM-web).
  - The names of the mailing lists (FVWM, FVWM-workers, etc.)
  - File names (fvwm.c - FVWM.c, fio.c - Fio.c,
fsm.h - Fsm.h etc.)
 
 You're stretching the point a little far here -- you can keep the
 filenames as-is.

I think you have no idea of the extend of my efforts to keep
naming consistent in the source tree.

  - The names of the executables (fvwm - FVWM, make_fvwmdist.sh
 
 Again, you can keep that as-is.
 
* Take the responsibility to explain to the users why this was
  done and why their config files are broken.
 
 I am happy to update the documentation to reflect s/fvwm/FVWM/g in
 *context* -- nothing else needs to change.

And I'm happy if you *don't* do it just in context.  I've spent
many hours to have consistent spelling all over the place.

 You're angry -- so I will let some of your points go without rising to
 the challenge.

I'm serous about every single pont.

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

 --
Dominik Vogt, dominik.vogt (at) gmx.de


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: FVWM: spelling of fvwm vs. Fvwm vs. FVWM

2007-08-09 Thread Thomas Adam
On 09/08/07, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I think opinions have been exchanged by now.  So, who of the
 people who promote FVWM as fvwm's name is willing to do the
 following:

   * Rename *all* occurences in *all* files in the fvwm and
 fvwm-web repositories from fvwm or Fvwm to FVWM,
 Excluding symbolic names in the source files.

I am more than happy to.

   * This includes

 - The name of the CVS repositories (FVWM and FVWM-web).
 - The names of the mailing lists (FVWM, FVWM-workers, etc.)
 - File names (fvwm.c - FVWM.c, fio.c - Fio.c,
   fsm.h - Fsm.h etc.)

You're stretching the point a little far here -- you can keep the
filenames as-is.

 - The names of the executables (fvwm - FVWM, make_fvwmdist.sh

Again, you can keep that as-is.

   * Take the responsibility to explain to the users why this was
 done and why their config files are broken.

I am happy to update the documentation to reflect s/fvwm/FVWM/g in
*context* -- nothing else needs to change.

You're angry -- so I will let some of your points go without rising to
the challenge.

-- Thomas Adam