Re: [gentoo-user] Network perf tool
Hi Patric, what about iperf? Robert. On Wednesday 24 of October 2012 20:36:54 Petric Frank wrote: Hello, this is not exactly an Gentoo question - but i don't now where to ask otherwise. Is there a tool for (Gentoo-)Linux to do network performance tests as defined in RFC 2544 ? This will run on an Gentoo host having at least 2 network interfaces to be connected to the device under test. regards Petric
[gentoo-user] X was crash at login window (gdm)
hi all , I do not like to update my gentoo frequently cause compile takes me a long time,but some days ago, I decided to upgrade my Xorg server to 1.13 and gentoo-source kernel 3.6.2 . it sucks me . the X was crash at login window, the screen was blank. sometimes you can see the mouse loading with the circle.I try to fix this as follows ,but it didn't work. (my video card is Nvidia Geforce 8400M) my Xorg.conf use nvidia-xconfig auto to generate. 1.update Nvidia driver to latest (304.43?) in the portage ( ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64) 2.download latest Nvidia driver form Nvidia Official website and install it 3 dowgrade Nvidia driver in the portage the attachment is my Xorg.log file ,you also can see it here http://pastebin.com/FZy7TRsf the ERROR is 1. NVIDIA(0): Error recovery failed. does anybody can help? or any suggestions? Xorg.0.log.old Description: Binary data
[gentoo-user] dual monitors and dual desktops
Hi, I have a laptop and an external monitor. I would like to have both monitors showing different desktops. My aim is to have IRC and Email client on one side, and my shell and programming stuff on the other side. Currently I managed to do a big virtual workspace with XRANDR, but it stretches the browser and it is hard to setup correctly. I'm a Fluxbox user, and didn't find a way to define that starching the window, will not stretch outside of the monitor I'm on. This is why I would like each monitor have it's own desktop. Thanks, Kfir virtual dual monitors: xrandr --output LVDS1 --primary --mode 1280x800 --pos 0x0 --auto --output VGA1 --mode 1920x1080 --pos 448x0 --primary
[gentoo-user] X was crash at login window (gdm)
hi all , I do not like to update my gentoo frequently cause compile takes me a long time,but some days ago, I decided to upgrade my Xorg server to 1.13 and gentoo-source kernel 3.6.2 . it sucks me . the X was crash at login window, the screen was blank. sometimes you can see the mouse loading with the circle.I try to fix this as follows ,but it didn't work. (my video card is Nvidia Geforce 8400M) my Xorg.conf use nvidia-xconfig auto to generate. 1.update Nvidia driver to latest (304.43?) in the portage ( ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64) 2.download latest Nvidia driver form Nvidia Official website and install it 3 dowgrade Nvidia driver in the portage the attachment is my Xorg.log file ,you also can see it here http://pastebin.com/FZy7TRsf the ERROR is 1. NVIDIA(0): Error recovery failed. does anybody can help? or any suggestions? Xorg.0.log.old Description: Binary data
[gentoo-user] Re: [Fluxbox-users] dual monitors and dual desktops
Thanks for your reply. This program does just what xrandr does. I didn't find a way to separate screens. It seems to define by default a virtual workspace, and let you just put both screens in this virtual workspace. The command at the bottom of this mail does just that. I want that the monitors will not show the same workspace. Both should show different desktops. It is like running xorg twice. Kfir On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Antonio Paiva arpa...@cnel.ufl.edu wrote: Try arandr. I have the same setup and arandr does the job perfectly. Moreover, it saves the settings as script that you can call upon boot. Regards, Antonio On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have a laptop and an external monitor. I would like to have both monitors showing different desktops. My aim is to have IRC and Email client on one side, and my shell and programming stuff on the other side. Currently I managed to do a big virtual workspace with XRANDR, but it stretches the browser and it is hard to setup correctly. I'm a Fluxbox user, and didn't find a way to define that starching the window, will not stretch outside of the monitor I'm on. This is why I would like each monitor have it's own desktop. Thanks, Kfir virtual dual monitors: xrandr --output LVDS1 --primary --mode 1280x800 --pos 0x0 --auto --output VGA1 --mode 1920x1080 --pos 448x0 --primary -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ Fluxbox-users mailing list fluxbox-us...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fluxbox-users
Re: [gentoo-user] dual monitors and dual desktops
I am also using a notebook with an external screen when i am at home. Till today I was not able to configure it correctly and comfortable. (Tried with radeon and fglrx driver) My wonderful working solution is One computer for every screen. :)) Connect all them with synergy and it seems to be one computer! :) I am running a synergy setup with gentoo, mint, osx and windows8 and it is much better than every multi monitor solution. I know this is more a workaround as a solution, but multi monitor with linux is crap, and synergy is a wonderful tool! :))) On 10/25/2012 02:42 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote: Hi, I have a laptop and an external monitor. I would like to have both monitors showing different desktops. My aim is to have IRC and Email client on one side, and my shell and programming stuff on the other side. Currently I managed to do a big virtual workspace with XRANDR, but it stretches the browser and it is hard to setup correctly. I'm a Fluxbox user, and didn't find a way to define that starching the window, will not stretch outside of the monitor I'm on. This is why I would like each monitor have it's own desktop. Thanks, Kfir virtual dual monitors: xrandr --output LVDS1 --primary --mode 1280x800 --pos 0x0 --auto --output VGA1 --mode 1920x1080 --pos 448x0 --primary
Re: [gentoo-user] dual monitors and dual desktops
Yes, this is a viable solution, but not if you have the laptop and no desktop. When I had workstation I also did use synergy. But now I have just an external monitor, and I need this solution. Kfir On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:11 PM, mindrunner ker...@ccube.de wrote: I am also using a notebook with an external screen when i am at home. Till today I was not able to configure it correctly and comfortable. (Tried with radeon and fglrx driver) My wonderful working solution is One computer for every screen. :)) Connect all them with synergy and it seems to be one computer! :) I am running a synergy setup with gentoo, mint, osx and windows8 and it is much better than every multi monitor solution. I know this is more a workaround as a solution, but multi monitor with linux is crap, and synergy is a wonderful tool! :))) On 10/25/2012 02:42 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote: Hi, I have a laptop and an external monitor. I would like to have both monitors showing different desktops. My aim is to have IRC and Email client on one side, and my shell and programming stuff on the other side. Currently I managed to do a big virtual workspace with XRANDR, but it stretches the browser and it is hard to setup correctly. I'm a Fluxbox user, and didn't find a way to define that starching the window, will not stretch outside of the monitor I'm on. This is why I would like each monitor have it's own desktop. Thanks, Kfir virtual dual monitors: xrandr --output LVDS1 --primary --mode 1280x800 --pos 0x0 --auto --output VGA1 --mode 1920x1080 --pos 448x0 --primary
Re: [gentoo-user] Network perf tool
I second iperf for network performance testing I've used it countless times, and does just what it claims to do. Ryan On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Robert David robert.david.pub...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Patric, what about iperf? Robert. On Wednesday 24 of October 2012 20:36:54 Petric Frank wrote: Hello, this is not exactly an Gentoo question - but i don't now where to ask otherwise. Is there a tool for (Gentoo-)Linux to do network performance tests as defined in RFC 2544 ? This will run on an Gentoo host having at least 2 network interfaces to be connected to the device under test. regards Petric
Re: [gentoo-user] Network perf tool
I have wrote a testbed for TCP testing [1]. One of the files is an iperf library [2]. If you want to run iperf automatically, you can look at my code and maybe use it. Kfir [1] https://github.com/kfirlavi/Amalia [2] https://github.com/kfirlavi/Amalia/blob/master/trunk/testbed/lib/iperf On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Ryan Decker rdec...@siena.edu wrote: I second iperf for network performance testing I've used it countless times, and does just what it claims to do. Ryan On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Robert David robert.david.pub...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Patric, what about iperf? Robert. On Wednesday 24 of October 2012 20:36:54 Petric Frank wrote: Hello, this is not exactly an Gentoo question - but i don't now where to ask otherwise. Is there a tool for (Gentoo-)Linux to do network performance tests as defined in RFC 2544 ? This will run on an Gentoo host having at least 2 network interfaces to be connected to the device under test. regards Petric
[gentoo-user] Re: Heads-up: Several kernel versions have severe EXT4 data corruption bug
On 2012-10-25, Kerin Millar kerfra...@fastmail.co.uk wrote: The comment you linked to was fairly bereft of technical content, That comment was from _Ted_Ts'o_ for pete's sake. When Ted T'so blows his nose, it's full of technical content. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! ... If I had heart at failure right now, gmail.comI couldn't be a more fortunate man!!
[gentoo-user] Re: dual monitors and dual desktops
On 2012-10-25, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote: I have a laptop and an external monitor. Here's how I do it using Xorg.config -- Section ServerLayout Identifier Triple Screen 0 Samsung0 Screen 1 Samsung1 rightof Samsung0 Screen 2 Acer leftof Samsung0 InputDeviceMouse0 CorePointer InputDeviceKeyboard0 CoreKeyboard EndSection -- There are three Device sections (one for one video card, and one for each of the DVI outputs on a second video card). There are then three corresponding Screen sections (named Samsung0, Samsung1, and Acer). Dunno anything about xrandr... -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Here I am at the flea at market but nobody is buying gmail.commy urine sample bottles ...
Re: [gentoo-user] X was crash at login window (gdm)
121025 sam new wrote: I do not like to update my gentoo frequently cause compile takes a long time, but I decided to upgrade my Xorg server to 1.13 and gentoo-source kernel 3.6.2 . Is this another case of not noticing the warning when updating Udev to run 'rc-update add udev-postmount' ? -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
[gentoo-user] Re: [Fluxbox-users] dual monitors and dual desktops
Hi,
I have i915 and its compiled in with kms support
Kfir
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Jonathan Reed jreed...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have an nvidia video card? If so I would recommend running
nvidia-setting to configure your displays. This is what I use after
trying {a,x,g}randr. I found it a little easier to use with an on-screen
view of how my monitors would display. Look under the X Server Display
Configuration section. It should be fairly easy to set up. I launch it
from my startup file because writing out the config to xorg.conf after I
change my display layout doesnt succeed for reasons i cant remember.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
This program does just what xrandr does.
I didn't find a way to separate screens. It seems to define by default a
virtual workspace, and let you just put both screens in this virtual
workspace.
The command at the bottom of this mail does just that.
I want that the monitors will not show the same workspace. Both should
show different desktops.
It is like running xorg twice.
Kfir
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Antonio Paiva arpa...@cnel.ufl.eduwrote:
Try arandr.
I have the same setup and arandr does the job perfectly. Moreover, it
saves the settings as script that you can call upon boot.
Regards,
Antonio
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a laptop and an external monitor.
I would like to have both monitors showing different desktops.
My aim is to have IRC and Email client on one side, and my shell and
programming stuff on the other side.
Currently I managed to do a big virtual workspace with XRANDR, but it
stretches the browser and it is hard to setup correctly.
I'm a Fluxbox user, and didn't find a way to define that starching the
window, will not stretch outside of the monitor I'm on.
This is why I would like each monitor have it's own desktop.
Thanks,
Kfir
virtual dual monitors:
xrandr --output LVDS1 --primary --mode 1280x800 --pos 0x0 --auto
--output
VGA1 --mode 1920x1080 --pos 448x0 --primary
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
___
Fluxbox-users mailing list
fluxbox-us...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fluxbox-users
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
___
Fluxbox-users mailing list
fluxbox-us...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fluxbox-users
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: dual monitors and dual desktops
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.comwrote: On 2012-10-25, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote: I have a laptop and an external monitor. Here's how I do it using Xorg.config -- Section ServerLayout Identifier Triple Screen 0 Samsung0 Screen 1 Samsung1 rightof Samsung0 Screen 2 Acer leftof Samsung0 InputDeviceMouse0 CorePointer InputDeviceKeyboard0 CoreKeyboard EndSection -- There are three Device sections (one for one video card, and one for each of the DVI outputs on a second video card). There are then three corresponding Screen sections (named Samsung0, Samsung1, and Acer). Does this setup really separate the screens to 2 desktops and not one big virtual desktop? Dunno anything about xrandr... -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Here I am at the flea at market but nobody is buying gmail.commy urine sample bottles ...
[gentoo-user] Re: Heads-up: Several kernel versions have severe EXT4 data corruption bug
Grant Edwards wrote: That comment was from _Ted_Ts'o_ for pete's sake. When Ted T'so blows his nose, it's full of technical content. That just made my day. Thanks :) -- Remy signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-user] Re: dual monitors and dual desktops
On 2012-10-25, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.comwrote: On 2012-10-25, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote: I have a laptop and an external monitor. Here's how I do it using Xorg.config -- Section ServerLayout Identifier Triple Screen 0 Samsung0 Screen 1 Samsung1 rightof Samsung0 Screen 2 Acer leftof Samsung0 InputDeviceMouse0 CorePointer InputDeviceKeyboard0 CoreKeyboard EndSection -- There are three Device sections (one for one video card, and one for each of the DVI outputs on a second video card). There are then three corresponding Screen sections (named Samsung0, Samsung1, and Acer). Does this setup really separate the screens to 2 desktops and not one big virtual desktop? My configuration above provides 3 separate X displays and 3 separate desktops. The mouse pointer and focus moves among the three screens as you would expect, but each screen is a a separate X display. The three DISPLAY variables end up as :0.0, :0.1, and :0.2. [There's only one X server running.] That means you can't drag a window from one screen to another, and a window can't overlap across two screens. It also means for a few applications you can only have the app running on one screen at a time. The vast majority of X apps don't care. But some, like Firefox (and other web browsers like Chrome and Opera), have added extra logic to prevent it. You'll have to ask the developers why, but I think it has something to do with their unwillingness to deal with file-locking when accessing config files. In _my_ particular configuration, I also have XFCE configured so that each of the three screens is configured with a pager that can flip through four virtual desktops independently of the other two screens. So I actually have a total of 12 virtual desktops (3 sets of 4). -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards at gmail.com
[gentoo-user] bumblebee and nvidia optimus
Hello guys, my laptop asus a55kv have two video controller, intel and nvidia, and i would like to configure bumblebee to use Xorg server. someone have configured bumblebee? Regards.
[gentoo-user] Networking
Hello, i have installed Virtualbox, but from the website not over Portage. I have now delete, because it want not really run and the computer has not the power. But now i have problems with the network. I have static IP Adresses in use, but gentoo want network not start the static Address, they want use dhcpd. I have unmerged the dhcp but now nothing want run. NFS, SSH, nothing really want start. gentoo-desk init.d # cat /etc/conf.d/net # This blank configuration will automatically use DHCP for any net.* # scripts in /etc/init.d. To create a more complete configuration, # please review /usr/share/doc/openrc*/net.example* and save your configuration # in /etc/conf.d/net (this file :]!). config_eth0=192.168.2.22 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.2.255 routes_eth0=default via 192.168.2.1 dns_servers_eth0=192.168.2.1 gentoo-desk init.d # /etc/init.d/sshd start * ERROR: cannot start sshd as dhcpcd would not start gentoo-desk init.d # /etc/init.d/nfsmount start * ERROR: cannot start nfsmount as dhcpcd would not start I have only the net and in it stand static Network. Where i find the config? I not know what should do now. gentoo-desk init.d # ifconfig eth0 Protokoll:Ethernet Hardware Adresse 00:30:05:3f:a1:a4 inet Adresse:192.168.2.22 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Maske:255.255.255.0 inet6 Adresse: fe80::230:5ff:fe3f:a1a4/64 Gültigkeitsbereich:Verbindung UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1994 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1348 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:1000 RX bytes:1892812 (1.8 MiB) TX bytes:257820 (251.7 KiB) loProtokoll:Lokale Schleife inet Adresse:127.0.0.1 Maske:255.0.0.0 inet6 Adresse: ::1/128 Gültigkeitsbereich:Maschine UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:10 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:10 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:0 RX bytes:180 (180.0 B) TX bytes:180 (180.0 B The network start when i start with /etc/init,d net.eth0 start. I understand not what uis the problem, has someone a idea? Regards and Thank for help Silvio
[gentoo-user] Re: Network perf tool
Petric Frank pfrank at gmx.de writes: Is there a tool for (Gentoo-)Linux to do network performance tests as defined in RFC 2544 ? This will run on an Gentoo host having at least 2 network interfaces to be connected to the device under test. Hello Petric, YES there is a wonderful tool to statistically track your network connections and present substantiating evidence to your carrier to support your Service Level Agreement. Briefly reading up on RFC 2544, it's all about data collection, monitoring and presenting SLA reports. First, there is a quick, minimal tool, call bm (bandwidth monitor) for mere instantaneous (concurrent) viewing. CBM Color Bandwidth Monitor is new to the portage tree, so you much sync to install that version. The comprehensive tool is JFFNMS, also in portage, which is backed nicely by either mysql or postgresql: Configurable per Circuit SLA’s (with RPN logic) http://www.jffnms.org/features/ Installation help http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/jffnms.xml You should join/use the discussion group: jffnms-us...@lists.sourceforge.net hth, James
Re: [gentoo-user] Networking
unmerging dhcp was not a good idea. I don't think you have very many options but to boot strap gentoo from CD and emerge back the net-misc/dhcp Do you need both client/server or just client? I'm running net-misc/dhcpcd -- Joseph On 10/25/12 20:25, Silvio Siefke wrote: Hello, i have installed Virtualbox, but from the website not over Portage. I have now delete, because it want not really run and the computer has not the power. But now i have problems with the network. I have static IP Adresses in use, but gentoo want network not start the static Address, they want use dhcpd. I have unmerged the dhcp but now nothing want run. NFS, SSH, nothing really want start. gentoo-desk init.d # cat /etc/conf.d/net # This blank configuration will automatically use DHCP for any net.* # scripts in /etc/init.d. To create a more complete configuration, # please review /usr/share/doc/openrc*/net.example* and save your configuration # in /etc/conf.d/net (this file :]!). config_eth0=192.168.2.22 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.2.255 routes_eth0=default via 192.168.2.1 dns_servers_eth0=192.168.2.1 gentoo-desk init.d # /etc/init.d/sshd start * ERROR: cannot start sshd as dhcpcd would not start gentoo-desk init.d # /etc/init.d/nfsmount start * ERROR: cannot start nfsmount as dhcpcd would not start I have only the net and in it stand static Network. Where i find the config? I not know what should do now. gentoo-desk init.d # ifconfig eth0 Protokoll:Ethernet Hardware Adresse 00:30:05:3f:a1:a4 inet Adresse:192.168.2.22 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Maske:255.255.255.0 inet6 Adresse: fe80::230:5ff:fe3f:a1a4/64 Gültigkeitsbereich:Verbindung UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1994 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1348 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:1000 RX bytes:1892812 (1.8 MiB) TX bytes:257820 (251.7 KiB) loProtokoll:Lokale Schleife inet Adresse:127.0.0.1 Maske:255.0.0.0 inet6 Adresse: ::1/128 Gültigkeitsbereich:Maschine UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:10 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:10 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:0 RX bytes:180 (180.0 B) TX bytes:180 (180.0 B The network start when i start with /etc/init,d net.eth0 start. I understand not what uis the problem, has someone a idea? Regards and Thank for help Silvio
Re: [gentoo-user] Heads-up: Several kernel versions have severe EXT4 data corruption bug
On Oct 25, 2012 10:08 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: http://lwn.net/Articles/521022/ Links to relevant analysis. Useful comments. 'nuff said. -- :wq Nice find, thanks. But the update to that article which gave a link to Theo T'so email is quite unnerving. He said that his initial hypothesis had not been proven and he himself is back in the dark. Not much confidence in ext4 for the time being for me. Back to reiserfs? ;-) Rgds, --
Re: [gentoo-user] Networking
Silvio Siefke siefke_lis...@web.de wrote: Hello, i have installed Virtualbox, but from the website not over Portage. I have now delete, because it want not really run and the computer has not the power. But now i have problems with the network. I have static IP Adresses in use, but gentoo want network not start the static Address, they want use dhcpd. I have unmerged the dhcp but now nothing want run. NFS, SSH, nothing really want start. gentoo-desk init.d # cat /etc/conf.d/net # This blank configuration will automatically use DHCP for any net.* # scripts in /etc/init.d. To create a more complete configuration, # please review /usr/share/doc/openrc*/net.example* and save your configuration # in /etc/conf.d/net (this file :]!). config_eth0=192.168.2.22 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.2.255 routes_eth0=default via 192.168.2.1 dns_servers_eth0=192.168.2.1 gentoo-desk init.d # /etc/init.d/sshd start * ERROR: cannot start sshd as dhcpcd would not start gentoo-desk init.d # /etc/init.d/nfsmount start * ERROR: cannot start nfsmount as dhcpcd would not start I have only the net and in it stand static Network. Where i find the config? I not know what should do now. gentoo-desk init.d # ifconfig eth0 Protokoll:Ethernet Hardware Adresse 00:30:05:3f:a1:a4 inet Adresse:192.168.2.22 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Maske:255.255.255.0 inet6 Adresse: fe80::230:5ff:fe3f:a1a4/64 Gültigkeitsbereich:Verbindung UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1994 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1348 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:1000 RX bytes:1892812 (1.8 MiB) TX bytes:257820 (251.7 KiB) loProtokoll:Lokale Schleife inet Adresse:127.0.0.1 Maske:255.0.0.0 inet6 Adresse: ::1/128 Gültigkeitsbereich:Maschine UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:10 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:10 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:0 RX bytes:180 (180.0 B) TX bytes:180 (180.0 B The network start when i start with /etc/init,d net.eth0 start. I understand not what uis the problem, has someone a idea? Regards and Thank for help Silvio Silvio. Do you have any other net.* services in your runlevel? If yes please remove them. -- Joost -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: [gentoo-user] Networking
Hello, 2012/10/25 Joseph syscon...@gmail.com: unmerging dhcp was not a good idea. I don't think you have very many options but to boot strap gentoo from CD and emerge back the net-misc/dhcp Do you need both client/server or just client? I'm running net-misc/dhcpcd Really, so never run Vmware or Virtualbox on system, nothing go more. Thats strange. I have back installed dhcpcd. Regards Silvio
Re: [gentoo-user] Heads-up: Several kernel versions have severe EXT4 data corruption bug
Pandu Poluan wrote: On Oct 25, 2012 10:08 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com mailto:mike...@gmail.com wrote: http://lwn.net/Articles/521022/ Links to relevant analysis. Useful comments. 'nuff said. -- :wq Nice find, thanks. But the update to that article which gave a link to Theo T'so email is quite unnerving. He said that his initial hypothesis had not been proven and he himself is back in the dark. Not much confidence in ext4 for the time being for me. Back to reiserfs? ;-) Rgds, -- Or just don't update the kernel until it is fixed. After all, if the kernel you are using works and is not a serious security problem, just use it for a while. They will fix it pretty soon I'm sure. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
Re: [gentoo-user] Networking
On 10/25/12 21:47, Silvio Siefke wrote: Hello, 2012/10/25 Joseph syscon...@gmail.com: unmerging dhcp was not a good idea. I don't think you have very many options but to boot strap gentoo from CD and emerge back the net-misc/dhcp Do you need both client/server or just client? I'm running net-misc/dhcpcd Really, so never run Vmware or Virtualbox on system, nothing go more. Thats strange. I have back installed dhcpcd. Regards Silvio Why don't you want to install VirtualBox from portage. I run VirtualBox on one of those tiny boxes with 1Mb or RAM and box takes only 18W of power. Yes, it is slow but runs OK. -- Joseph
Re: [gentoo-user] Networking
Hello, On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:17:00 -0600 Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote: Why don't you want to install VirtualBox from portage. Has not internet, only mobile conection and so i have downloaded by my dad direct from the website. I run VirtualBox on one of those tiny boxes with 1Mb or RAM and box takes only 18W of power. Yes, it is slow but runs OK. I want take a look at Android X86, but i think my kernel was not correct. Ok i have read today the Tutorial for Gentoo and Virtualbox. But when i have so trouble with the network, then is not so funny. The static ip is not for fun in config. I must see, maybe i try again, and then from portage. Now all is running, hope. But after delete the kernel, all config and udev rules from Virtualbox and restart go all again. Thank u and Regards Silvio
Re: [gentoo-user] Heads-up: Several kernel versions have severe EXT4 data corruption bug
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: SNIP Nice find, thanks. But the update to that article which gave a link to Theo T'so email is quite unnerving. He said that his initial hypothesis had not been proven and he himself is back in the dark. Not much confidence in ext4 for the time being for me. Back to reiserfs? ;-) Rgds, -- I'm not an ext4 user (it's too new!) and therefore unaffected by any of this personally. However I do read lkml and have been following the thread since it started. This bug, if indeed in the end it's even determined to be a bug, is apparently pretty hard to hit. The downside is that if you did hit it the effects can be pretty devastating. I'd suggest folks consider going through the thread and not overreacting to the masking of new kernels or stuff posted on Phoronix or slashdot. It's good that the info is out there so people can make informed decisions, but one of the downsides of having all the info is the potential for people to overreact. Even with a ;-) dumping ext4 for Reiserfs might be in that camp. :-) Cheers, Mark
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads-up: Several kernel versions have severe EXT4 data corruption bug
Grant Edwards wrote: On 2012-10-25, Kerin Millarkerfra...@fastmail.co.uk wrote: The comment you linked to was fairly bereft of technical content, That comment was from _Ted_Ts'o_ for pete's sake. I don't care it was from the heavens upon high. The only remark that was meaningful in a technical sense was the thoroughly inconclusive Update, suggesting (but not establishing) that it might be related to certain combinations of mount options. The rest was just hand-waving about how it couldn't be a big deal because, if it was, lots of people would have been complaining, which is denying the antecedent. Let's separate two fundamental issues here. One issue is that of data corruption, which is a big deal. I'm sure most of us would agree on that point. That such an issue is going to generate news - and no small degree of discussion - is a given. People will want to know what the problem is and what they can do about it in order to be safe. What did Ted expect? The second issue is that of the scope of the bug. This is where I took issue with the comment. The overall meaning of his comment could be interpreted as Your collective concerns are overblown because the scope of this bug is minimal. Oh, and I think it may have something to do with these mount options which, being esoteric, nobody in their right mind would be using anyway so, hey, big deal. The fact of the matter is that the investigation, even as I write this, is ongoing and no patch has been produced. Consider that for a moment. It doesn't matter how brilliant Ted is, or that you have seen fit to sample his mucus. Telling us all that we should be unconcerned because the scope is minimal *before* he and his peers have completed their investigation and a line been drawn under the affair was simply premature. That the bug reporter has since demonstrated that the corruption can occur in kernel versions that don't include commit eeecef0af5 - kernels which we were previously told were not affected - only serves to demonstrate this point. --Kerin
Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel 2 manual
Damn, totaly forgot what I would write :) You may also have a loog at # make localmodconfig Great tool. Should be added to handbook. :) I think my work is almost done. The kernel has 2.7MB, and I've removed all obvious unnecessary choices, just reading the 'help' from 'make menuconfig'. It was necessary to recompile nvidia-drivers a couple times, I don't know why, but now everything is working pretty fine. Thank you all, -- João de Matos Linux User #461527
Re: [gentoo-user] Network perf tool
Hello, iperf is a good tool, but ... Fr example the RFC 2544 throughput test does not allow any failed/missing/corrupted packed during the testing time. In this case the data speed is to be reduced and the test to be executed again. Also a throughput test is only one part of the RFC 2544. regards Petric Am Donnerstag, 25. Oktober 2012, 10:37:02 schrieb Robert David: Hi Patric, what about iperf? Robert. On Wednesday 24 of October 2012 20:36:54 Petric Frank wrote: Hello, this is not exactly an Gentoo question - but i don't now where to ask otherwise. Is there a tool for (Gentoo-)Linux to do network performance tests as defined in RFC 2544 ? This will run on an Gentoo host having at least 2 network interfaces to be connected to the device under test. regards Petric
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: dual monitors and dual desktops
On 10/25/2012 07:40 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: So I actually have a total of 12 virtual desktops (3 sets of 4). Searching the terminal window opened 6 hours ago on one of the 12 virutal desktops sounds like fun :D
Re: [gentoo-user] Networking
Actually this is no reason not installing with portage... On 10/25/2012 10:27 PM, Silvio Siefke wrote: Why don't you want to install VirtualBox from portage. Has not internet, only mobile conection and so i have downloaded by my dad direct from the website.
Re: [gentoo-user] Heads-up: Several kernel versions have severe EXT4 data corruption bug
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: On Oct 25, 2012 10:08 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: http://lwn.net/Articles/521022/ Links to relevant analysis. Useful comments. 'nuff said. -- :wq Nice find, thanks. They have an RSS feed. Good stuff. I heard about this before it hit Slashdot or Phoronix. The subscriber stuff is _truly_ good. But the update to that article which gave a link to Theo T'so email is quite unnerving. He said that his initial hypothesis had not been proven and he himself is back in the dark. Not much confidence in ext4 for the time being for me. Back to reiserfs? ;-) Consider the trillions of operational hours of ext4 without incident...you're just trolling. -- :wq
Re: [gentoo-user] Heads-up: Several kernel versions have severe EXT4 data corruption bug
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:10:17 -0500, Dale wrote: Or just don't update the kernel until it is fixed. After all, if the kernel you are using works and is not a serious security problem, just use it for a while. They will fix it pretty soon I'm sure. Several versions are affected, it's not a new issue, just a newly discovered one. That in itself indicates the likelihood of being affected by it, considering how many boxes use ext4 with these kernel versions. -- Neil Bothwick But I thought YOU did the backups... signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Networking
On 10/25/12 22:27, Silvio Siefke wrote: Hello, On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:17:00 -0600 Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote: Why don't you want to install VirtualBox from portage. Has not internet, only mobile conection and so i have downloaded by my dad direct from the website. I run VirtualBox on one of those tiny boxes with 1Mb or RAM and box takes only 18W of power. Yes, it is slow but runs OK. I want take a look at Android X86, but i think my kernel was not correct. Ok i have read today the Tutorial for Gentoo and Virtualbox. But when i have so trouble with the network, then is not so funny. The static ip is not for fun in config. I must see, maybe i try again, and then from portage. Now all is running, hope. But after delete the kernel, all config and udev rules from Virtualbox and restart go all again. Thank u and Regards Silvio You going too fast and in the wrong places :-) First you unmerge dhcp now, you are delete the kernel! With this paste you will be re-installing Gentoo in no time :-/ Rule #1 If It Aint Broken Don't Fix It. Just follow the instruction from: http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/VirtualBox and everything will be working just fine. If you upgrade the kernel yes, you need to recompile Virtual box modules. -- Joseph
Re: [gentoo-user] Heads-up: Several kernel versions have severe EXT4 data corruption bug
On Oct 26, 2012 3:14 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Pandu Poluan wrote: On Oct 25, 2012 10:08 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: http://lwn.net/Articles/521022/ Links to relevant analysis. Useful comments. 'nuff said. -- :wq Nice find, thanks. But the update to that article which gave a link to Theo T'so email is quite unnerving. He said that his initial hypothesis had not been proven and he himself is back in the dark. Not much confidence in ext4 for the time being for me. Back to reiserfs? ;-) Rgds, -- Or just don't update the kernel until it is fixed. After all, if the kernel you are using works and is not a serious security problem, just use it for a while. They will fix it pretty soon I'm sure. Unfortunately, since Ted T'so himself couldn't even pinpoint what's wrong, how can I be sure that other kernel versions are unaffected? Rgds, --
Re: [gentoo-user] Heads-up: Several kernel versions have severe EXT4 data corruption bug
On Oct 26, 2012 3:36 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: SNIP Nice find, thanks. But the update to that article which gave a link to Theo T'so email is quite unnerving. He said that his initial hypothesis had not been proven and he himself is back in the dark. Not much confidence in ext4 for the time being for me. Back to reiserfs? ;-) Rgds, -- I'm not an ext4 user (it's too new!) and therefore unaffected by any of this personally. However I do read lkml and have been following the thread since it started. This bug, if indeed in the end it's even determined to be a bug, is apparently pretty hard to hit. The downside is that if you did hit it the effects can be pretty devastating. I'd suggest folks consider going through the thread and not overreacting to the masking of new kernels or stuff posted on Phoronix or slashdot. It's good that the info is out there so people can make informed decisions, but one of the downsides of having all the info is the potential for people to overreact. Even with a ;-) dumping ext4 for Reiserfs might be in that camp. :-) Cheers, Mark LoL... I was just joking about dumping ext4. I still am going to use ext4, but I will ratchet up the backup schedule, and anyone thinking of restarting a Linux server in my office before first performing a full backup, will be severely reprimanded. (I *do* use ReiserFS, though. Especially for portage's tmp) Rgds, --
Re: [gentoo-user] Heads-up: Several kernel versions have severe EXT4 data corruption bug
On Oct 26, 2012 6:14 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: On Oct 25, 2012 10:08 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: http://lwn.net/Articles/521022/ Links to relevant analysis. Useful comments. 'nuff said. -- :wq Nice find, thanks. They have an RSS feed. Good stuff. I heard about this before it hit Slashdot or Phoronix. The subscriber stuff is _truly_ good. Thanks! But the update to that article which gave a link to Theo T'so email is quite unnerving. He said that his initial hypothesis had not been proven and he himself is back in the dark. Not much confidence in ext4 for the time being for me. Back to reiserfs? ;-) Consider the trillions of operational hours of ext4 without incident...you're just trolling. I plead guilty, your honor :-P Okay, I'm not serious about dumping ext4 for ReiserFS. But my confidence is still shaken. I'm going to implement a more severe watch+backup strategy for all ext4 partitions. Rgds, --
