Re: [gentoo-user] Again emerge represents a wise koan

2017-01-27 Thread Meino . Cramer
 Roeleveld  [17-01-28 08:12]:
> On Saturday, January 28, 2017 4:43:14 AM CET meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I tried to decipher this, but I failed, since the six isn't there
> > actually...
> > 
> > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy
> > ">=dev-python/six-1.10.0[python_targets_pypy(-)?,python_targets_pypy3(-)?,p
> > ython_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_pyth
> > on3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-pyth
> > on_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_4(-),-python_sin
> > gle_target_python3_5(-)]". (dependency required by
> > "dev-python/setuptools-34.0.2-r1::gentoo" [ebuild]) (dependency required by
> > "dev-python/pygments-2.1.1::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by
> > "dev-python/docutils-0.12::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by
> > "media-video/mpv-0.23.0::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by
> > "@selected" [set])
> > (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
> > 
> > How can I get out of this?
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Meino
> 
> 
> I would recommend a re-sync. That package and version exists on my system:
> [I] dev-python/six
>  Available versions:  1.10.0{tbz2} {doc test PYTHON_TARGETS="pypy pypy3 
> python2_7 python3_4 python3_5"}
>  Installed versions:  1.10.0{tbz2}(09:05:31 AM 11/04/2016)(-doc -test 
> PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 -pypy -pypy3 -python3_5")
>  Homepage:https://bitbucket.org/gutworth/six https://
> pypi.python.org/pypi/six
>  Description: Python 2 and 3 compatibility library
> 
> And I sync'd yesterday.
> 
> --
> Joost
> 

does not help...same as before...

Meino





Re: [gentoo-user] Again emerge represents a wise koan

2017-01-27 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Saturday, January 28, 2017 4:43:14 AM CET meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I tried to decipher this, but I failed, since the six isn't there
> actually...
> 
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy
> ">=dev-python/six-1.10.0[python_targets_pypy(-)?,python_targets_pypy3(-)?,p
> ython_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_pyth
> on3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-pyth
> on_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_4(-),-python_sin
> gle_target_python3_5(-)]". (dependency required by
> "dev-python/setuptools-34.0.2-r1::gentoo" [ebuild]) (dependency required by
> "dev-python/pygments-2.1.1::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by
> "dev-python/docutils-0.12::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by
> "media-video/mpv-0.23.0::gentoo" [installed]) (dependency required by
> "@selected" [set])
> (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
> 
> How can I get out of this?
> 
> Cheers
> Meino


I would recommend a re-sync. That package and version exists on my system:
[I] dev-python/six
 Available versions:  1.10.0{tbz2} {doc test PYTHON_TARGETS="pypy pypy3 
python2_7 python3_4 python3_5"}
 Installed versions:  1.10.0{tbz2}(09:05:31 AM 11/04/2016)(-doc -test 
PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 -pypy -pypy3 -python3_5")
 Homepage:https://bitbucket.org/gutworth/six https://
pypi.python.org/pypi/six
 Description: Python 2 and 3 compatibility library

And I sync'd yesterday.

--
Joost



[gentoo-user] Again emerge represents a wise koan

2017-01-27 Thread Meino . Cramer
Hi,

I tried to decipher this, but I failed, since the six isn't there
actually...

emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy 
">=dev-python/six-1.10.0[python_targets_pypy(-)?,python_targets_pypy3(-)?,python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_4(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-)]".
(dependency required by "dev-python/setuptools-34.0.2-r1::gentoo" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "dev-python/pygments-2.1.1::gentoo" [installed])
(dependency required by "dev-python/docutils-0.12::gentoo" [installed])
(dependency required by "media-video/mpv-0.23.0::gentoo" [installed])
(dependency required by "@selected" [set])
(dependency required by "@world" [argument])

How can I get out of this?

Cheers
Meino






[gentoo-user] Re: Pulseaudio - Asus Xonar STX II 7.1 - 5.1 Surround - Front audio is coming from rear speakers in Firefox

2017-01-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 01/27/2017 06:15 PM, Jochen Kirchner wrote:

Hi fellow gentoo'ers,


I'm running XFCE with pulseaudio.

Hardware is Asus Xonar STX II with the 7.1 daughterboard

Analog Surround 5.1 is selected in xfce4-volumed-pulse.

If I do speaker-test -c 6 all is right. Front audio is put through the
front speakers.

But if I play sound in Firefox and/or Chromium (eg. youtube) the sound
is mainly coming through the rear speakers.

Any advice? If you need more info please let me know, thanks!


Run alsamixer (media-sound/alsa-utils). Press F6, select the Xonar and 
look for a "Stereo Upmix" setting.


Also, make sure you're using the "Virtuoso" kernel driver 
(SND_VIRTUOSO), not the C-Media "Oxygen" one (SND_OXYGEN). The Virtuoso 
driver should provide the correct mixer controls for Xonar cards.


(The Oxygen driver works too, since the Xonar cards use the Oxygen chip, 
but it might not provide Xonar-specific mixer controls.)





Re: [gentoo-user] Bootloaders: SILENT CRISIS!!!

2017-01-27 Thread Mick
On Saturday 28 Jan 2017 07:49:13 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 28/01/17 07:27, Mick wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 Jan 2017 06:50:32 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> >> On 28/01/17 00:25, Tom H wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy 
> > 
> > wrote:
>  I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and
>  more robust.
> >>> 
> >>> rEFIt or rEFInd?
> >> 
> >> Sorry, yes it is rEFInd I am using.
> >> 
> >> BillK
> > 
> > Where did you install rEFInd?  In the EFI partition?  I am about to
> > install
> > gentoo on a MackBook Pro, but do not want to mess up the original 3
> > partitions installed by OSX, any more than is absolutely necessary.
> > 
> > I could start a new thread if this is hijacking the OP's, but there are
> > some parallels with boot loaders at least.  I am thinking of trying out
> > the sys- boot/systemd-boot (ex-gumiboot) instead of rEFInd.  Will it be
> > able to launch the OSX  boot64.efi?
> 
> mounted at /boot/efi
> 
> /boot
> └── efi
> └── EFI
> ├── Boot
> ├── gentoo
> ├── Microsoft
> │   ├── Boot
> │   │   ├── ar-SA
> snip
> │   └── Recovery
> ├── refind
> │   ├── banners
> │   ├── drivers_x64
> │   ├── fonts
> │   ├── icons
> │   │   ├── licenses
> │   │   └── svg
> │   ├── images
> │   ├── keys
> │   └── tools_x64
> └── tools
> 
> bunyip ~ # fdisk -l /dev/nvme0n1
> Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 238.5 GiB, 256060514304 bytes, 500118192 sectors
> Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> Disklabel type: gpt
> Disk identifier: 8607528E-5D14-4725-BC44-F325B97B6736
> 
> Device Start   End   Sectors   Size Type
> /dev/nvme0n1p1  2048534527532480   260M EFI System
> /dev/nvme0n1p2534528796671262144   128M Microsoft reserved
> /dev/nvme0n1p3796672 251281407 250484736 119.5G Microsoft basic data
> /dev/nvme0n1p4 496185344 500117503   3932160   1.9G Windows recovery
> environment
> /dev/nvme0n1p5 251281408 276447231  2516582412G Linux swap
> /dev/nvme0n1p6 276447232 496185343 219738112 104.8G Linux filesystem
> 
> Partition table entries are not in disk order.
> 
> /boot/efi/EFI/refind/refind.conf
> timeout 2
> showtools shell, gdisk, memtest, mok_tool, windows_recovery, about,
> reboot, exit, firmware
> scanfor manual
> menuentry Linux-4.9.5-gentoo {
> icon /EFI/refind/icons/os_gentoo.png
> volume 760df07d-ec40-452f-95ee-cb47acf22069
> loader /EFI/gentoo/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.5-gentoo.efi
> initrd /EFI/gentoo/initramfs-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.5-gentoo.img
> options "acpi_osi=Linux i915.semaphores=1 intel_iommu=off
> pcie_port_pm=off rootdelay=15 ro
> root=UUID=fc556f9c-e9b9-4ed3-8244-94f9f1a7d4d0 dobtrfs maxcpus=1 zcache
> resume=/dev/nvme0n1p5"
> }
> menuentry Linux-4.9.4-gentoo {
> icon /EFI/refind/icons/os_gentoo.png
> volume 760df07d-ec40-452f-95ee-cb47acf22069
> loader /EFI/gentoo/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.4-gentoo.efi
> initrd /EFI/gentoo/initramfs-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.4-gentoo.img
> options "acpi_osi=Linux i915.semaphores=1 intel_iommu=off
> pcie_port_pm=off rootdelay=15 ro
> root=UUID=fc556f9c-e9b9-4ed3-8244-94f9f1a7d4d0 dobtrfs maxcpus=1 zcache
> resume=/dev/nvme0n1p5"
> }
> menuentry "Windows 10" {
> loader \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi
> }

Thanks, I may have a go installing rEFInd or systemd-boot this weekend.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Bootloaders: SILENT CRISIS!!!

2017-01-27 Thread Bill Kenworthy
On 28/01/17 07:27, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 28 Jan 2017 06:50:32 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>> On 28/01/17 00:25, Tom H wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy  
> wrote:
 I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and
 more robust.
>>>
>>> rEFIt or rEFInd?
>>
>> Sorry, yes it is rEFInd I am using.
>>
>> BillK
> 
> Where did you install rEFInd?  In the EFI partition?  I am about to install 
> gentoo on a MackBook Pro, but do not want to mess up the original 3 
> partitions 
> installed by OSX, any more than is absolutely necessary.
> 
> I could start a new thread if this is hijacking the OP's, but there are some 
> parallels with boot loaders at least.  I am thinking of trying out the sys-
> boot/systemd-boot (ex-gumiboot) instead of rEFInd.  Will it be able to launch 
> the OSX  boot64.efi?
> 

mounted at /boot/efi

/boot
└── efi
└── EFI
├── Boot
├── gentoo
├── Microsoft
│   ├── Boot
│   │   ├── ar-SA
snip
│   └── Recovery
├── refind
│   ├── banners
│   ├── drivers_x64
│   ├── fonts
│   ├── icons
│   │   ├── licenses
│   │   └── svg
│   ├── images
│   ├── keys
│   └── tools_x64
└── tools

bunyip ~ # fdisk -l /dev/nvme0n1
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 238.5 GiB, 256060514304 bytes, 500118192 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 8607528E-5D14-4725-BC44-F325B97B6736

Device Start   End   Sectors   Size Type
/dev/nvme0n1p1  2048534527532480   260M EFI System
/dev/nvme0n1p2534528796671262144   128M Microsoft reserved
/dev/nvme0n1p3796672 251281407 250484736 119.5G Microsoft basic data
/dev/nvme0n1p4 496185344 500117503   3932160   1.9G Windows recovery
environment
/dev/nvme0n1p5 251281408 276447231  2516582412G Linux swap
/dev/nvme0n1p6 276447232 496185343 219738112 104.8G Linux filesystem

Partition table entries are not in disk order.

/boot/efi/EFI/refind/refind.conf
timeout 2
showtools shell, gdisk, memtest, mok_tool, windows_recovery, about,
reboot, exit, firmware
scanfor manual
menuentry Linux-4.9.5-gentoo {
icon /EFI/refind/icons/os_gentoo.png
volume 760df07d-ec40-452f-95ee-cb47acf22069
loader /EFI/gentoo/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.5-gentoo.efi
initrd /EFI/gentoo/initramfs-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.5-gentoo.img
options "acpi_osi=Linux i915.semaphores=1 intel_iommu=off
pcie_port_pm=off rootdelay=15 ro
root=UUID=fc556f9c-e9b9-4ed3-8244-94f9f1a7d4d0 dobtrfs maxcpus=1 zcache
resume=/dev/nvme0n1p5"
}
menuentry Linux-4.9.4-gentoo {
icon /EFI/refind/icons/os_gentoo.png
volume 760df07d-ec40-452f-95ee-cb47acf22069
loader /EFI/gentoo/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.4-gentoo.efi
initrd /EFI/gentoo/initramfs-genkernel-x86_64-4.9.4-gentoo.img
options "acpi_osi=Linux i915.semaphores=1 intel_iommu=off
pcie_port_pm=off rootdelay=15 ro
root=UUID=fc556f9c-e9b9-4ed3-8244-94f9f1a7d4d0 dobtrfs maxcpus=1 zcache
resume=/dev/nvme0n1p5"
}
menuentry "Windows 10" {
loader \EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi
}




Re: [gentoo-user] Bootloaders: SILENT CRISIS!!!

2017-01-27 Thread Mick
On Saturday 28 Jan 2017 06:50:32 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 28/01/17 00:25, Tom H wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy  
wrote:
> >> I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and
> >> more robust.
> > 
> > rEFIt or rEFInd?
> 
> Sorry, yes it is rEFInd I am using.
> 
> BillK

Where did you install rEFInd?  In the EFI partition?  I am about to install 
gentoo on a MackBook Pro, but do not want to mess up the original 3 partitions 
installed by OSX, any more than is absolutely necessary.

I could start a new thread if this is hijacking the OP's, but there are some 
parallels with boot loaders at least.  I am thinking of trying out the sys-
boot/systemd-boot (ex-gumiboot) instead of rEFInd.  Will it be able to launch 
the OSX  boot64.efi?

-- 
Regards,
Mick

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Bootloaders: SILENT CRISIS!!!

2017-01-27 Thread Bill Kenworthy
On 28/01/17 00:25, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy  wrote:
>>
>> I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and
>> more robust.
> 
> rEFIt or rEFInd?
> 

Sorry, yes it is rEFInd I am using.

BillK




Re: [gentoo-user] SNAFU: TO THE N'TH POWER!

2017-01-27 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:41:44 -0500, Alan Grimes wrote:

> Device  Start   End   Sectors   Size Type
> /dev/sdc12048264191262144   128M EFI System
> /dev/sdc2  526336 537233407 536707072 255.9G Linux filesystem
> /dev/sdc3  264192526335262144   128M BIOS boot

You don't have a BIOS boot partition on a UEFI system. They are for
compatibility when using GPT disks with BIOS systems, and even hen you
don't put anything on them.

Just create an EFI System partition, formatted using FAT and mounted
at /boot as the first partition, then divide the rest of the disk
between /, /home swap as you see fit.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Drink varnish and you'll have a lovely finish.


pgpzElG0x3awt.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[gentoo-user] cyrus-sasl and multiple berkdb segfault

2017-01-27 Thread Konstantin
Hello Guys,

On one of my gentoo servers i had dev-libs/cyrus-sasl installed for some
time. Users configured for sasl auth.
After last system update i found that 'sasldblistusers2' and other commands
broken:

# sasldblistusers2
Successful return: 0
Segmentation fault

# ldd `which sasldblistusers2`
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffcaa381000)
libsasl2.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libsasl2.so.3 (0x7f4fbac9)
libdb-4.8.so => /usr/lib64/libdb-4.8.so (0x7f4fba91)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x7f4fba577000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x7f4fba373000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f4fba157000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7f4fbaeae000)

And finally i found that 2 different version of sys-libs/db installed:

# eix -I sys-libs/db
[I] sys-libs/db
 Available versions:
 (1)1.85-r3
 (3)3.2.9_p2
 (4.2)  4.2.52_p5-r1
 (4.3)  4.3.29_p1-r1
 (4.4)  ~4.4.20_p4-r1
 (4.5)  4.5.20_p2-r1
 (4.6)  4.6.21_p4
 (4.7)  4.7.25_p4
 (4.8)  4.8.30-r2{tbz2}
 (5.1)  ~5.1.29-r1
 (5.3)  5.3.28-r2{tbz2}
 (6.0)  ~6.0.35
 (6.1)  [M]~6.1.29
 (6.2)  [M]~6.2.23
   {cxx doc examples java rpc tcl test ABI_MIPS="n32 n64 o32"
ABI_PPC="32 64" ABI_S390="32 64" ABI_X86="32 64 x32" ELIBC="FreeBSD"}
 Installed versions:  4.8.30-r2(4.8){tbz2}(03:50:39 AM 07/28/2016)(cxx
-doc -examples -java -tcl -test ABI_MIPS="-n32 -n64 -o32" ABI_PPC="-32 -64"
ABI_S390="-32 -64" ABI_X86="64 -32 -x32" ELIBC="-FreeBSD")
5.3.28-r2(5.3){tbz2}(04:57:46 PM 01/27/2017)(cxx -doc -examples -java -tcl
-test ABI_MIPS="-n32 -n64 -o32" ABI_PPC="-32 -64" ABI_S390="-32 -64"
ABI_X86="64 -32 -x32" ELIBC="-FreeBSD")
 Homepage:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/database-technologies/berkeleydb/overview/index.html
 Description: Oracle Berkeley DB

eix -I dev-libs/cyrus-sasl
[I] dev-libs/cyrus-sasl
 Available versions:  (2) 2.1.26-r9{tbz2} ~2.1.26-r10
(~)2.1.26-r11{tbz2}
   {authdaemond berkdb gdbm java kerberos ldapdb libressl mysql
openldap pam postgres sample selinux sqlite srp ssl static-libs urandom
ABI_MIPS="n32 n64 o32" ABI_PPC="32 64" ABI_S390="32 64" ABI_X86="32 64 x32"
ELIBC="FreeBSD"}
 Installed versions:  2.1.26-r11(2){tbz2}(05:29:23 PM
01/27/2017)(berkdb pam ssl urandom -authdaemond -gdbm -java -kerberos
-ldapdb -libressl -mysql -openldap -postgres -sample -selinux -sqlite -srp
-static-libs ABI_MIPS="-n32 -n64 -o32" ABI_PPC="-32 -64" ABI_S390="-32 -64"
ABI_X86="64 -32 -x32" ELIBC="-FreeBSD")

I tried to unmerge sys-libs/db-5.3.28-r2 but i see another packages (perl
and some modules) already compiled against db-5.
Also i rebuild cyrus-sasl dut it did not help.
revdep-rebuild said 'Your system is consistent'.

Can anyone help me to fix cyrus-sasl?

Thanks.
-- 
*This message was delivered using 100% recycled electrons*.


Re: [gentoo-user] Pulseaudio - Asus Xonar STX II 7.1 - 5.1 Surround - Front audio is coming from rear speakers in Firefox

2017-01-27 Thread J. Roeleveld
On January 27, 2017 5:26:15 PM GMT+01:00, Jochen Kirchner  
wrote:
>
>
>On 01/27/2017 05:15 PM, Jochen Kirchner wrote:
>>
>> Hi fellow gentoo'ers,
>>
>>
>> I'm running XFCE with pulseaudio.
>>
>> Hardware is Asus Xonar STX II with the 7.1 daughterboard
>>
>> Analog Surround 5.1 is selected in xfce4-volumed-pulse.
>>
>> If I do speaker-test -c 6 all is right. Front audio is put through
>the
>> front speakers.
>>
>> But if I play sound in Firefox and/or Chromium (eg. youtube) the
>sound
>> is mainly coming through the rear speakers.
>>
>> Any advice? If you need more info please let me know, thanks!
>>
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Jochen
>>
>
>I'm running systemd if that matters!
>
>emerge --info
>http://pastebin.com/4C9AcGhs
>
>emerge -pv pulseaudio
>[ebuild   R] media-sound/pulseaudio-9.0::gentoo  USE="X alsa
>alsa-plugin asyncns caps gdbm glib gtk ipv6 orc ssl systemd tcpd udev
>webrtc-aec -bluetooth -dbus -doc -equalizer -gnome -jack (-libressl)
>-libsamplerate -lirc -native-headset (-neon) -ofono-headset (-oss) -qt4
>-realtime (-selinux) -sox (-system-wide) {-test} -xen -zeroconf"
>ABI_X86="32 (64) (-x32)" 0 KiB

I don't think systemd matters in this case.

I would expect some config setting for 'normal' stereo sound forcing it to the 
rear speakers.

--
Joost
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.



Re: [gentoo-user] Pulseaudio - Asus Xonar STX II 7.1 - 5.1 Surround - Front audio is coming from rear speakers in Firefox

2017-01-27 Thread Jochen Kirchner


On 01/27/2017 05:15 PM, Jochen Kirchner wrote:
>
> Hi fellow gentoo'ers,
>
>
> I'm running XFCE with pulseaudio.
>
> Hardware is Asus Xonar STX II with the 7.1 daughterboard
>
> Analog Surround 5.1 is selected in xfce4-volumed-pulse.
>
> If I do speaker-test -c 6 all is right. Front audio is put through the
> front speakers.
>
> But if I play sound in Firefox and/or Chromium (eg. youtube) the sound
> is mainly coming through the rear speakers.
>
> Any advice? If you need more info please let me know, thanks!
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Jochen
>

I'm running systemd if that matters!

emerge --info
http://pastebin.com/4C9AcGhs

emerge -pv pulseaudio
[ebuild   R] media-sound/pulseaudio-9.0::gentoo  USE="X alsa
alsa-plugin asyncns caps gdbm glib gtk ipv6 orc ssl systemd tcpd udev
webrtc-aec -bluetooth -dbus -doc -equalizer -gnome -jack (-libressl)
-libsamplerate -lirc -native-headset (-neon) -ofono-headset (-oss) -qt4
-realtime (-selinux) -sox (-system-wide) {-test} -xen -zeroconf"
ABI_X86="32 (64) (-x32)" 0 KiB



Re: [gentoo-user] Bootloaders: SILENT CRISIS!!!

2017-01-27 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy  wrote:
>
> I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and
> more robust.

rEFIt or rEFInd?



Re: [gentoo-user] Bootloaders: SILENT CRISIS!!!

2017-01-27 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Alan Grimes  wrote:


> I looked for more information on GRUB form upstream but, on first
> impression, it's been an abandoned project since 2012... Apparently
> some users have posted patches to things like the invalid sector size
> problem but the project has been deaf to these problems and has done
> nothing whatsoever. =(

That's grub1 (which doesn't understand efi). grub2 is still being developed.


> I thought maybe I could go simple and use something like elilo.

Unfortunately elilo's been abandoned.



[gentoo-user] Pulseaudio - Asus Xonar STX II 7.1 - 5.1 Surround - Front audio is coming from rear speakers in Firefox

2017-01-27 Thread Jochen Kirchner
Hi fellow gentoo'ers,


I'm running XFCE with pulseaudio.

Hardware is Asus Xonar STX II with the 7.1 daughterboard

Analog Surround 5.1 is selected in xfce4-volumed-pulse.

If I do speaker-test -c 6 all is right. Front audio is put through the
front speakers.

But if I play sound in Firefox and/or Chromium (eg. youtube) the sound
is mainly coming through the rear speakers.

Any advice? If you need more info please let me know, thanks!


Kind Regards,

Jochen



Re: [gentoo-user] SNAFU: TO THE N'TH POWER!

2017-01-27 Thread Alan Grimes
Alan Grimes wrote:
[]

Had another learning experience with respect to how GPT disks work.,
system is buttoned up and operating in GPT mode. In old systems, the
boot sectors and bootstrap loaders were kinda consigned to a digital
pergatory on the drive, now you just have to give it its own 1mb
partition... *sigh*.

Oh well, at least I learned something from this ordeal...

-- 
Strange Game.
The only winning move is not to play. 

Powers are not rights.




[gentoo-user] SNAFU: TO THE N'TH POWER!

2017-01-27 Thread Alan Grimes
To make a boot disk in DOS you have two options.

Format /s  x:
and
Sys x:

Once this is done, the new disk will boot perfectly [period] .

So what I did was I deleted my botched UEFI partition, and created two
new partitions, each of half-size.
I mark ... well.:

#33
localhost ~ # fdisk -l /dev/sdc
Disk /dev/sdc: 256.2 GiB, 275064201216 bytes, 537234768 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 00C7D602-412C-4505-8992-0482855EDEF9

Device  Start   End   Sectors   Size Type
/dev/sdc12048264191262144   128M EFI System
/dev/sdc2  526336 537233407 536707072 255.9G Linux filesystem
/dev/sdc3  264192526335262144   128M BIOS boot

Partition table entries are not in disk order.
localhost ~ #



I then set up my crap. on the BIOS boot partition, adjust the grub.cfg
entries on that partition to expect to show up as hd0/sda[*] and try to
boot the mofo...
I got some BIOS errors regarding a boot failure, I'm not sure what
that's about. =(
I adjusted my d-ram voltage back to 1.475 which is what I think it needs
to be... Have no idea, probably a red herring...

After that, u know what happened?

REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!
REBOOT LOOP!

[gentoo-user] julia against libgit2-0.25.1

2017-01-27 Thread Zhu Sha Zang
Hello there, someone with problems on julia after upgrade libgit2 to 
0.25.1 version?


Since them i'm facing a impossibility to upgrade packages. And yes, 
julia was recompiled against new libgit2.



julia> Pkg.update()
INFO: Updating METADATA...
ERROR: METADATA cannot be updated. Resolve problems manually in 
/home/rodolfo/.julia/v0.5/METADATA.

GitError(Code:ERROR, Class:Invalid, Invalid version 0 on git_proxy_options)
 in macro expansion at ./libgit2/error.jl:99 [inlined]
 in #fetch#52(::Base.LibGit2.FetchOptions, ::String, ::Function, 
::Base.LibGit2.GitRemote, ::Array{AbstractString,1}) at 
./libgit2/remote.jl:70
 in (::Base.LibGit2.#kw##fetch)(::Array{Any,1}, ::Base.LibGit2.#fetch, 
::Base.LibGit2.GitRemote, ::Array{AbstractString,1}) at ./:0
 in #fetch#93(::String, ::String, ::Array{AbstractString,1}, 
::Nullable{Base.LibGit2.AbstractCredentials}, ::Function, 
::Base.LibGit2.GitRepo) at ./libgit2/libgit2.jl:164

 in eval_user_input(::Any, ::Base.REPL.REPLBackend) at ./REPL.jl:64
 in macro expansion at ./REPL.jl:95 [inlined]
 in (::Base.REPL.##3#4{Base.REPL.REPLBackend})() at ./event.jl:68
 in eval_user_input(::Any, ::Base.REPL.REPLBackend) at ./REPL.jl:64
 in macro expansion at ./REPL.jl:95 [inlined]
 in (::Base.REPL.##3#4{Base.REPL.REPLBackend})() at ./event.jl:68


Any help are welcome. Best regards.





Re: [gentoo-user] snafu: the update

2017-01-27 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Alan Grimes  wrote:
> Tom H wrote:


>> AFAIK, when you load the kernel directly from the EFI firmware, it has
>> to have the ".efi" suffix. But that doesn't explain why it would stall
>> when loaded from grub...
>>
>> Somewhat OT: Regarding grub, your "/boot/" is messy. It might not be
>> making a difference for (efi)-grub2's functioning but you have grub1
>> files (*stage1_5), grub2 bios files (i386-pc/), as well as grub2 efi
>> files (x86_64-efi/).
>
> Yeah, I've been using that directory for many many long years, I ended
> up removing the grub directory completely and re-installing, it's much
> cleaner now.

ACK. I just thought that I'd point it out.


> I think there's something with how I'm compiling the kernel and the EFI
> boot requirements aren't quite being met and the loader is trying to
> execute non-code or some other error of that general nature. But that's
> just a brainstorm, I really hate it when my machine gives me this kind
> of problem where I don't even have an error message.

If you're loading the kernel from grub, you don't have to compile the
efi stub/stuff into the kernel.


>  FROM GRUB.CFG #
>
> echo 'Loading Linux 4.6.7 ...'
>  it successfully executes this line
> linux /vmlinuz-4.6.7 root=/dev/sda2 ro
>  but fails before the first output from the kernel
>
> 

Looking at your grub.cfg, I wonder whether "linux /vmlinuz-4.6.7 ..."
is correct.

Looking at your original "tree" output, it looks like you're mounting
the ESP at "/boot" and that grub's being loaded from
"/boot/EFI/gentoo/grubx64.efi".

What are the grub.cfg lines that start with "search" and "set root"?



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What has happened to the Gentoo tree?

2017-01-27 Thread Helmut Jarausch

On 01/27/2017 12:11:56 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:

On 01/27/2017 11:56 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:

Thanks Mick, thanks Neil,

it turned out that eix (I'm using eix-99) was broken. I removed  
it

and installed again.
This fixed the issue.


Or you forgot to run eix-update after doing emerge --sync?


I don't think so, since I have been using  eix-sync  for ages.



[gentoo-user] Re: What has happened to the Gentoo tree?

2017-01-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 01/27/2017 11:56 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:

Thanks Mick, thanks Neil,

it turned out that eix (I'm using eix-99) was broken. I removed it
and installed again.
This fixed the issue.


Or you forgot to run eix-update after doing emerge --sync?





Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with gdbus-codegen

2017-01-27 Thread Marc Joliet
On Thursday 26 January 2017 22:42:06 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 26/01/2017 17:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > (Sent via webmail while I continue wrestling with KMail...)
> > 
> > Alan McKinnon  wrote :
> >> Does explicitly emerging gdbus-codegen-2.50.2 then re-running a world
> >> emerge give a different result?
> > 
> > peak ~ # emerj -1 =gdbus-codegen-2.50.2
> > Calculating dependencies  ... done!
> > 
> > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "=gdbus-codegen-2.50.2".
> > peak ~ # eix -e gdbus-codegen
> > [I] dev-util/gdbus-codegen
> > 
> >  Available versions:  2.44.1 2.46.2 2.48.2 (~)2.50.0 (~)2.50.1
> >  (~)2.50.2 {PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5"} Installed
> >  versions:  2.50.2(18:06:24 10/01/17)(PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7
> >  python3_4 -python3_5") Homepage:http://www.gtk.org/
> >  Description: GDBus code and documentation generator
> > 
> > Something's screwed up here. I ran eclean-dist this morning and it listed
> > 90-odd packages with versions not in the database, which was not true.
> > Running eix-update again made no difference.
> > 
> > I'm considering building a new system, but amd64 instead of ~amd64. I only
> > set the latter when this was a new box and too many packages needed to be
> > the ~ versions to be manageable otherwise.
> Somethng has gone wrong with your installation of portage or your copy
> of the tree - that "no ebuilds" message is impossible.
> 
> It will probably be a cruel task to track down exactly what is wrong, my
> intuition says something in a local cache somewhere. Might be easiest
> just to delete all portage data (*except* /var/db/pkg), download a new
> tree tarball and let portage sort itself out

No clue if it's related or not, but I thought I'd mention this anyway:

This reminds me of a vaguely similar problem I had this week, though luckily 
it was time-variant: portage refused to update boost-build because it was 
masked, but the reason given was... literally empty.  Immediately retrying it 
on my desktop worked, but on my laptop it took a few retries (*no* changes in-
between) for portage to offer the upgrade. (Actually, for $reasons, I wanted 
to do --fetchonly first, which took a few retries, then do the upgrade proper, 
which took several more tries before the error went away again.)

Naturally, I haven't had any problems since...

Greetings
-- 
Marc Joliet
--
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] java replacement

2017-01-27 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:15:42 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:

> > Some people think they can sell anything to everyone and then there is
> > Alan and me.  You to Neil.  ROFL  
> 
> It also helps if you know multiple languages and can switch between
> them at will. I once had a call from someone wanting to sell me
> something. The conversation kept switching to different languages and
> the person kept asking me to repeat what I said. I would simply repeat
> the same, but in a different language. If only I'd be fluent in
> Klingon ;)

You don't have to be fluent, as long as the caller isn't ;-)

I recently had a conversation along the lines of

Caller: Would you like a free quote for a conservatory?
Me: Ooh yes, I'd really like a conservatory...
Caller: 
Me: ... but I'm not sure the people in the flat downstairs would be
too happy about it
Caller: 


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Windows Error #10: Insufficient money spent in hardware.


pgpHJh6VgzBcn.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] What has happened to the Gentoo tree?

2017-01-27 Thread Helmut Jarausch

Thanks Mick, thanks Neil,

it turned out that eix (I'm using eix-99) was broken. I removed it  
and installed again.

This fixed the issue.

Helmut


Re: [gentoo-user] java replacement

2017-01-27 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Thursday, January 26, 2017 3:14:15 PM CET Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On 26/01/2017 03:52, Dale wrote:
> >> taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> >>> On 01/25/2017 05:03 AM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>  The java 8u112 download that the latest oracle java pulls in requires
>  an
>  invasive questionnaire to create an Oracle account to enable the
>  download.
>  
>  I was using iced-tea at one stage but found the android sdk didn’t work
>  well with it - is there a less objectionable java source than oracle
>  that has a compatible java?
>  
>  BillK
> >>> 
> >>> "Why does radio-shack ask for your phone number why you buy batteries!"
> >>> 
> >>> Always good to not put up with this crap, I like to feed them
> >>> obviously fake information when I need something from a place that
> >>> insists on doing this.
> >>> 
> >>> I purchased some hardware (at a physical store with cash none the
> >>> less) recently and the cashier asked for my information and was
> >>> annoyingly insistent[1] so I gave them "John Smith at 123 1st Street"
> >>> as she audibly sucked her teeth.
> >>> 
> >>> The more people put up with this stuff the more bad things will happen
> >>> - two police officers recently were murdered in france because a
> >>> terrorist got their address off the internet and paid them a visit.
> >>> 
> >>> [1]I presume they get a bonus for how many marketing
> >>> emails/information they collect.
> >> 
> >> It's also good to have a email address that you rarely if ever check.  I
> >> have one with the words spam, junk and such in it.  I like the looks I
> >> get when I give it to them.  Generally, they not happy.   Thing is, if I
> >> need to confirm something, I can login and confirm it.  It is a valid
> >> email addy, I just rarely check it.
> >> 
> >> It's odd just how much info they want just so we can be a customer.
> >> Some act like we owe them something.
> > 
> > If you own your own domain and sign up for say a bank account at
> > Citibank, give your address as
> > 
> > i.have.just.been.spammed.by.citib...@mckinnon.za.net
> > 
> > and you will never see spam from that institution :-)
> > I have it on good authority (from friends working there) that local
> > banks etc "grep -v" anything that remotely matches their own name or
> > domain when selling^Wsharing lists with spammers^Wpartners...
> > 
> > 
> > Now if I can just get my own employer to get it too. Got another of
> > these phone calls today:
> > 
> > Them: Hi Alan! I'm calling from XYZ mobile network to offer you a great
> > deal!!
> > Me: I work for XYZ mobile network
> > Them: Oh. Our special has great call rates!
> > Me: All my calls are free
> > Them: You get a great phone at a great discount...!
> > Me: I have a top-flight company phone as a tool of trade, plus a
> > notebook, plus a modem plus 2 x 24" hires screens
> > Them: E ... how about a great deal for you wife?
> > Me: The company gives me a second SIM for my spouse, same benefits
> > 
> > Srsly, that happened. And some people have no idea when they are driving
> > down Hopeless Street :-)
> 
> I don't have a website but I hope others see that post and give it a
> try.  I wish we could see results for some of that, statistical of course.
> 
> It reminds me of a time I won a TV.  I would have to go get it and it
> was a day, maybe two, drive away from me.  The gas alone would cost more
> than the TV would.  Plus I'd need at least one nights hotel.  To finally
> end the nonsense I told the guy where to put his TV, sideways, not that
> it mattered much back then.
> 
> Some people think they can sell anything to everyone and then there is
> Alan and me.  You to Neil.  ROFL

It also helps if you know multiple languages and can switch between them at 
will. I once had a call from someone wanting to sell me something. The 
conversation kept switching to different languages and the person kept asking 
me to repeat what I said. I would simply repeat the same, but in a different 
language. If only I'd be fluent in Klingon ;)

I can keep that up for an hour easily.

--
Joost