Re: [gentoo-user] OT Best font selection?
That's not free, that's M$ stuff, but I'd suggest you to take a look, just take a look, at Segoe UI fonts. I Don't know any free fonts comparable to it, but there's a story of some guy who charged M$ for using his font as base for Segoe... I don't know if that font is free, or even if it exists, but it may be worth to take a look at =) If anyone knows a free font comparable to Segoe, I'd be pleased to be aware of =))) And terminus is so f*ck*ng awesome I'm actually using it as my interface font in xmonad =) On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:55 PM, darren kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: quoth the Liviu Andronic: So, what font do you use for the User Interface? Happy with Bitstream Vera Sans myself. Clean, clear, and looks good. For fixed I use Courier 10-pitch. -d -- darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org ...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected... - Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972 -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] OT Best font selection?
Well, it's included in portage, and I paid $0 for it so.. Is Segoe UI really in Portage? At the last time I emerged corefonts it wasn't present, so I had to find it on the web =) And by free, I meant the really free free, you know =) I was simply stating what I use because I think it looks good. Damn good IMHO! -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] SurroundSound, Pulseaudio CPU Usage
Hello my fellows. Before my trouble I'll tell you a little story. I'm a (not so happy) owner of a Audigy SE 7.1 soundcard, unable to do hardware mixing. I own a 7.1 home theater system, so to hear sound from all satellites I use an Alsa fake device to upmix 2.0 to a 7.1 stream, using the route alsa-plugin. As this uses a slave PCM that in fact is a multi PCM (surround71), the sound device gets locked everytime I listen to any sounds. That means I can't watch a video while hearing music, flash sounds won't work either... and worse: crossfading in media players refuse to work as well. After months trying to figure out a way to hear sound with the deserved freedom in my PC the only solution I found was pulseaudio. Basically I route ALL sounds to pulseaudio by default, and pulseaudio routes to my fake upmix device. When I want to hear a 5.1 or 7.1 sound, like a DVD, I have to specify the surround71 or surround51 devices for that, and in the end I got my soundcard locked anyway. That was not a perfect solution, but I was happy enough not to break my crappy creative card apart. But I was not happy for long, so I began to be very very upset with a fact: as you can see, Amarok is now using 19% of my CPU, while pulseaudio is using 16: 13967 gucampos 20 0 179m 57m 28m S 19 5.7 0:14.51 amarokapp 14174 gucampos 20 0 18424 3488 2756 R 16 0.3 0:03.67 pulseaudio That's a top. The commom average is 10 for amarok and 8 for pulseaudio, which I still believe to be too much for my system (3.0Ghz Pentium 4 Prescott, 2x512 DDR400). I thought that the realtime priority of pulseaudio could be the problem, so I disabled it, and the problem remains. Google returns me lots of people complaining, but no actually solutions. Besides that, my sound now is a bit choppy sometimes, which I believe is pulseaudio's high cpu usage fault. My point is: Is there any way to tell pulseaudio not to eat my cpu that much? Or better: Is there a solution that would allow me to be a happy child without having to use pulseaudio and it's extra layer between me and my beloved hardware? You guys can't imagine how much I played with google and alsa without solution before I surrended to pulseaudio. If you show me a better solution I'll feel myself stupid, but happy. -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] SurroundSound, Pulseaudio CPU Usage
Well, that would certainly help to trace the problem with pulseaudio, yes. But I must admit that I'm hoping someone here has a more pleasant suggestion. Something like a magical solution or that obvious shot I'd never think about =) Anyway, I don't believe that it's really a pulseaudio bug, so I'm afraid to file a bug for it, but I'm beggining to change my mind =( On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Ophidian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gustavo Campos wrote: My point is: Is there any way to tell pulseaudio not to eat my cpu that much? Or better: Is there a solution that would allow me to be a happy child without having to use pulseaudio and it's extra layer between me and my beloved hardware? You guys can't imagine how much I played with google and alsa without solution before I surrended to pulseaudio. If you show me a better solution I'll feel myself stupid, but happy. You might get your best results if you email Lennart and/or open a ticket at http://pulseaudio.org/ Aaron -- The goblins are in charge of maintenance? Why not just set it on fire now and call it a day? --Whip Tongue, Viashino Technician -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] firefox crash when playing flash
I'm a xmonad user here, no compiz at all and the problem exists. As I said, it looks pretty much like a sound problem. I believe changing for firefox-bin won't help, cause the trouble resides in the flash player itself, I think... but it's a shot! For me, maybe I'll try firefox 3 beta =) On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:12 AM, Qi Baobin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NO. Does it help if i replace firefox with the forefox-bin package? On 06:36 Sun 13 Apr , José Pedro Saraiva wrote: Are you using compiz-fusion? There are reported problems with firefox and flash contents with compiz-fusion... -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] firefox crash when playing flash
Actually since I sent you the response Firefox has crashed one more time while playing Flash. Indeed, that used to happen more often before... now I don't really know if it was just a coincidence or not =/ Are you using pulseaudio? In my case when Firefox crashes the command line indicates some problem with pulseaudio (can't reproduce right now), could you run Firefox from the command line and post the crash message it shows at exit? On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Qi Baobin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, but it still doesn't work for me. On 09:12 Thu 10 Apr , Gustavo Campos wrote: I was having the same problem here, looking over the web found a solution used for Ubuntu users I could adapt for me. Exporting the environment variable FIREFOX_DSP=auto solved the crashing for me. At the other hand, my mplayer plugin is not working, but I don't really know if it was before the change, probably not... anyway more tests are needed, but Flash is working fine now =) On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Qi Baobin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for replying so late. My computer is 32bit. I will try what Roman said, thanks for that. I will paste the result later. :) On 20:27 Wed 09 Apr , Mateusz A. Mierzwin'ski wrote: Roman Zilka pisze: Hello, I don't have any specific idea, but try recompiling Firefox without any CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS set. Using another Flash implementation (Gnash/Adobe) might solve the problem too (or introduce new problems:). Also try cleaning up your Firefox profile (in terms of add-ons, most importantly). -rz [ebuild R ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.13 USE=ipv6 -bindist -debug -filepicker -gnome -iceweasel -java -mozdevelop -moznopango -restrict-javascript -xforms -xinerama -xprint LINGUAS=zh_CN -af -ar -be -bg -ca -cs -da -de -el -en_GB -es -es_AR -es_ES -eu -fi -fr -fy -fy_NL -ga -ga_IE -gu -gu_IN -he -hu -it -ja -ka -ko -ku -lt -mk -mn -nb -nb_NO -nl -nn -nn_NO -pa -pa_IN -pl -pt -pt_BR -pt_PT -ro -ru -sk -sl -sv -sv_SE -tr -uk -zh -zh_TW 0 kB uname -a Linux bobbin 2.6.24-gentoo-r3 #15 SMP Sun Mar 30 20:16:31 Local time zone must be set--see zic i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T5600 @ 1.83GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux Do you have 32 or 64-bits Linux (exec. x86_64). If You use 64 bits (36 physical and 48 virtual addressing) You will have problem with flash. Flash by adobe was only release 32-bit. NSWrapper emulates (converts) address spaces but ABI have running issues between 32 and 64bit version. Also Adobe is far enough to release 64-bit version, so You must try to live with it. If you have enough flash problem install 32-bit Gentoo Linux. Greet's Mateusz M. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] firefox crash when playing flash
There is no message on the console.Firefox was just no responding. I need to kill the process and restart it,after that it would run well util next crash. Oh I see, for crash I understood it has closed abnormally, what happened to you is looks what I would call a freeze =) So, that makes things a little difficult, as is hard to trace... I figure out that the mpd didn't work either when the firefox was suspending there, is it possible they cann't work together. Well that points to the road I was trying to take: sound problem. What I can't figure out is why it is hanging. Here in my PC, before I installed pulseaudio, I was unable to hear two sounds from different sources, because my machine has no hardware mixer, and I user a multi device to play stereo sounds (upmixing 2.0 to 7.1 stream), but when I tried to play something in firefox, it just wouldn't play the sound, but work silently without any problems. Do you have an /etc/asound.conf (or ~/.asoundrc) file? Can you post the contents of it? On 11:27 Fri 11 Apr , Gustavo Campos wrote: Actually since I sent you the response Firefox has crashed one more time while playing Flash. Indeed, that used to happen more often before... now I don't really know if it was just a coincidence or not =/ Are you using pulseaudio? In my case when Firefox crashes the command line indicates some problem with pulseaudio (can't reproduce right now), could you run Firefox from the command line and post the crash message it shows at exit? On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Qi Baobin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, but it still doesn't work for me. On 09:12 Thu 10 Apr , Gustavo Campos wrote: I was having the same problem here, looking over the web found a solution used for Ubuntu users I could adapt for me. Exporting the environment variable FIREFOX_DSP=auto solved the crashing for me. At the other hand, my mplayer plugin is not working, but I don't really know if it was before the change, probably not... anyway more tests are needed, but Flash is working fine now =) On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Qi Baobin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for replying so late. My computer is 32bit. I will try what Roman said, thanks for that. I will paste the result later. :) On 20:27 Wed 09 Apr , Mateusz A. Mierzwin'ski wrote: Roman Zilka pisze: Hello, I don't have any specific idea, but try recompiling Firefox without any CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS set. Using another Flash implementation (Gnash/Adobe) might solve the problem too (or introduce new problems:). Also try cleaning up your Firefox profile (in terms of add-ons, most importantly). -rz [ebuild R ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.13 USE=ipv6 -bindist -debug -filepicker -gnome -iceweasel -java -mozdevelop -moznopango -restrict-javascript -xforms -xinerama -xprint LINGUAS=zh_CN -af -ar -be -bg -ca -cs -da -de -el -en_GB -es -es_AR -es_ES -eu -fi -fr -fy -fy_NL -ga -ga_IE -gu -gu_IN -he -hu -it -ja -ka -ko -ku -lt -mk -mn -nb -nb_NO -nl -nn -nn_NO -pa -pa_IN -pl -pt -pt_BR -pt_PT -ro -ru -sk -sl -sv -sv_SE -tr -uk -zh -zh_TW 0 kB uname -a Linux bobbin 2.6.24-gentoo-r3 #15 SMP Sun Mar 30 20:16:31 Local time zone must be set--see zic i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T5600 @ 1.83GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux Do you have 32 or 64-bits Linux (exec. x86_64). If You use 64 bits (36 physical and 48 virtual addressing) You will have problem with flash. Flash by adobe was only release 32-bit. NSWrapper emulates (converts) address spaces but ABI have running issues between 32 and 64bit version. Also Adobe is far enough to release 64-bit version, so You must try to live with it. If you have enough flash problem install 32-bit Gentoo Linux. Greet's Mateusz M. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] firefox crash when playing flash
I was having the same problem here, looking over the web found a solution used for Ubuntu users I could adapt for me. Exporting the environment variable FIREFOX_DSP=auto solved the crashing for me. At the other hand, my mplayer plugin is not working, but I don't really know if it was before the change, probably not... anyway more tests are needed, but Flash is working fine now =) On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Qi Baobin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for replying so late. My computer is 32bit. I will try what Roman said, thanks for that. I will paste the result later. :) On 20:27 Wed 09 Apr , Mateusz A. Mierzwin'ski wrote: Roman Zilka pisze: Hello, I don't have any specific idea, but try recompiling Firefox without any CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS set. Using another Flash implementation (Gnash/Adobe) might solve the problem too (or introduce new problems:). Also try cleaning up your Firefox profile (in terms of add-ons, most importantly). -rz [ebuild R ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.13 USE=ipv6 -bindist -debug -filepicker -gnome -iceweasel -java -mozdevelop -moznopango -restrict-javascript -xforms -xinerama -xprint LINGUAS=zh_CN -af -ar -be -bg -ca -cs -da -de -el -en_GB -es -es_AR -es_ES -eu -fi -fr -fy -fy_NL -ga -ga_IE -gu -gu_IN -he -hu -it -ja -ka -ko -ku -lt -mk -mn -nb -nb_NO -nl -nn -nn_NO -pa -pa_IN -pl -pt -pt_BR -pt_PT -ro -ru -sk -sl -sv -sv_SE -tr -uk -zh -zh_TW 0 kB uname -a Linux bobbin 2.6.24-gentoo-r3 #15 SMP Sun Mar 30 20:16:31 Local time zone must be set--see zic i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T5600 @ 1.83GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux Do you have 32 or 64-bits Linux (exec. x86_64). If You use 64 bits (36 physical and 48 virtual addressing) You will have problem with flash. Flash by adobe was only release 32-bit. NSWrapper emulates (converts) address spaces but ABI have running issues between 32 and 64bit version. Also Adobe is far enough to release 64-bit version, so You must try to live with it. If you have enough flash problem install 32-bit Gentoo Linux. Greet's Mateusz M. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Skipping static libraries
$ grep '^dt' allpackages | \ sed 's/.*a href[^]*\([^]*\)\/a.*/\1/g' | \ cut -d '-' -f 1 | \ uniq | wc -l 12225 No matter how much I live and code, regular expressions always scare me like hell Comments (also about the methodology used to calculate this) are left as an exercise for the reader :-) I guess that gentoo beats debian :) I hope so too! -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Accept all versions but 9999
Well, I must admit I'm not really in the position to negate that one. Not a so travelled man, you know? The truth is that it take me some time to notice you guys were talking about our bible-like-one-that-works-e-book, I'm used to read English, but mostly that one in the tech books. But never fear, I just discovered urbandictionary.com and from now on by any means our communication shall be inaccurate. And I'm also starting to learn how to trust in gmail's spell checker (my gmail is in engliish, which makes it a bit nonsense to correct my usually Portuguese mail) On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:50:16 -0300, Gustavo Campos wrote: And for instance, I would apprecciate if you guys made some globalized jokes, The entire Galaxy isn't global enough for you? -- Neil Bothwick Micro-: (prefix) anything both very small and very expensive. -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Randomly dumb questions
I believe that is true. In gmail we usually see our own posts because it composes the conversations not only with the received messages, but also with the sent ones (in the sent messages label) On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote: Dale wrote: | Chris Brennan wrote: | How come I don't see my own posts to this list? | | We got this one. I saw one other one too. | Dale | | :-) :-) Ya but you didn't answer my question :D The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the same address as what sent it. This is pretty usual behaviour for any list run by a non-idiot (like this one) -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Accept all versions but 9999
Of course I can, but first we must state: little or big endian? compliment by two? On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Chris Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 well we could all just give up and communicate in binary You can read and right binary can't you? Gustavo Campos wrote: | Well, I must admit I'm not really in the position to negate that one. | Not a so travelled man, you know? | | The truth is that it take me some time to notice you guys were talking | about our bible-like-one-that-works-e-book, I'm used to read English, | but mostly that one in the tech books. | | But never fear, I just discovered urbandictionary.com and from now on | by any means our communication shall be inaccurate. And I'm also | starting to learn how to trust in gmail's spell checker (my gmail is | in engliish, which makes it a bit nonsense to correct my usually | Portuguese mail) | | On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:50:16 -0300, Gustavo Campos wrote: | | And for instance, I would apprecciate if you guys made some globalized | jokes, | | The entire Galaxy isn't global enough for you? | | | -- | Neil Bothwick | | Micro-: (prefix) anything both very small and very expensive. | | | | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH29NC8hUIAnGfls4RApgwAJ0Wet5edxaRzTGpk63YfoTIvJB5KQCcCFCR tsfOBN9ZgXu8+2Z3w3f71wQ= =2YJv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Accept all versions but 9999
BCD is good, but time goes on, we must improve, we must evolve. We thrived, we evolved, not the time has come for us to step back again, into the light. On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 15 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote: Of course I can, but first we must state: little or big endian? compliment by two? Pah! These cocky youngsters, all full of bright ideas about using fancy new-fangled stuff. What is this endian nonsense of which you speak? And this twos compliment garbage? We don't need no steenken twos compliment: We use BCD -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] [OFF TOPIC] PGP Messages Email clients
I know it's good for all of us to know that we are tealking to actually someone real, but I never got too much into PGP because of that damned clutter messages it generates. Anyone knows if gmail (and the other clients) can mask the PGP singnatures from mail? For me at least it's pretty much enough for it to just show me that the message is indeed signed, I don'n care about the public key stuff and all xD -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] [OFF TOPIC] PGP Messages Email clients
Well, ther must be some Firefox extension too, probably - gone searching. On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Chris Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I dunno if gmail can ... but I am sure thunderbird has some ext. that might be able to help. For me, I don't see it, GNUpg just tells TB that the message has been signed and that I can retrieve the pubkey if I wish to. Gustavo Campos wrote: | I know it's good for all of us to know that we are tealking to | actually someone real, but I never got too much into PGP because of | that damned clutter messages it generates. | | Anyone knows if gmail (and the other clients) can mask the PGP | singnatures from mail? For me at least it's pretty much enough for it | to just show me that the message is indeed signed, I don'n care about | the public key stuff and all xD | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH2/ZH8hUIAnGfls4RAg+bAJ0Q1ys3kHnaFkwVi2uv6I8AqcyWwgCghl6u lUbNufD8U9H6fGIx+XDnu0w= =dpNK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] [OFF TOPIC] PGP Messages Email clients
Compatibility trouble? On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Strong Cypher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: why dont use the pgp mime mode? a join file with the signature message dont disturb people without pgp mail client On 3/15/08, Gustavo Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, ther must be some Firefox extension too, probably - gone searching. On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Chris Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I dunno if gmail can ... but I am sure thunderbird has some ext. that might be able to help. For me, I don't see it, GNUpg just tells TB that the message has been signed and that I can retrieve the pubkey if I wish to. Gustavo Campos wrote: | I know it's good for all of us to know that we are tealking to | actually someone real, but I never got too much into PGP because of | that damned clutter messages it generates. | | Anyone knows if gmail (and the other clients) can mask the PGP | singnatures from mail? For me at least it's pretty much enough for it | to just show me that the message is indeed signed, I don'n care about | the public key stuff and all xD | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH2/ZH8hUIAnGfls4RAg+bAJ0Q1ys3kHnaFkwVi2uv6I8AqcyWwgCghl6u lUbNufD8U9H6fGIx+XDnu0w= =dpNK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] [OFF TOPIC] PGP Messages Email clients
Life is pure irony On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Matt Nordhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it's funny that Enigmail isn't happy with any of the messages in this thread. Mostly Error - No valid armored OpenPGP data block found, one can't find the key to import. -- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Accept all versions but 9999
That's the way I did it before, you know... but it really comes to be a pain in the ass when you want to test some new supercool releases with tons of dependencies, such as kde-4 and so on. However that's some neat tip, I haven't though on the possibility of leaving just package.keywords, I'm giving it a try just right now! Thanks a lot! On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 14 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote: Hi there. I have a stable system (I don't have ~x86 set), but I like to have the latest versions of some specific software (kde, gnome, amarok, alsa, pulseaudio, wine and so on). To achieve that, I've been using autounmask with the parameter -n. When I have a package I want to keep in the latest version, I just autounmask -n package, so all the dependencies are unmasked and no version number is appended. That works fine, but I like to have the latest released versions, which means I usually want to get away from the * ebuilds. The trouble is, when I use autounmask without version numbers, those packages usually are choosen by portage, for being the effective latest ones. I would like to know if there is a way for me to unmask (automatically if possible) all versions BUT the ones, so I have the latest releases but the less CVS/Beta packages as possible. I find autounmask does way too much for me, and does it blindly just like a dumb computer should. so I do it manually. However, you are using -n and at the same time trying to use it without -n... Trying deleting the autounmask files in /etc/portage/package.unmask/, that should go a long way to removing the CVS stuff (which is usually hard masked) leaving just package.keywords. You might have to manually resolve some conflicts now and then though - small price -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Accept all versions but 9999
Compile time =) Actually when I ripped off package.unmask, the kde-4 tree just got crazy, so I moved back only autounmask-kde-meta. After that, alsa-driver, which was at - wanted to go back to 1.0.15, that doesn't compile (bug in bugs.gentoo), so I'm now compiling alsa in-kernel, but ir pretty much seems to be working out (thinking about an emerge -C `equery list | grep | xargs` now)... Anyway, I believe I got planty of time, it's raining a f***ing lot here and I'm not inclined to be on my way to the University ^^ On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 14 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote: That's the way I did it before, you know... but it really comes to be a pain in the ass when you want to test some new supercool releases with tons of dependencies, such as kde-4 and so on. Tell me about it, been there done that, I feel your pain :-) However that's some neat tip, I haven't though on the possibility of leaving just package.keywords, I'm giving it a try just right now! Thanks a lot! It was just an idea that came to me, completely untested. Let us know if it mostly works out. On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 14 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote: Hi there. I have a stable system (I don't have ~x86 set), but I like to have the latest versions of some specific software (kde, gnome, amarok, alsa, pulseaudio, wine and so on). To achieve that, I've been using autounmask with the parameter -n. When I have a package I want to keep in the latest version, I just autounmask -n package, so all the dependencies are unmasked and no version number is appended. That works fine, but I like to have the latest released versions, which means I usually want to get away from the * ebuilds. The trouble is, when I use autounmask without version numbers, those packages usually are choosen by portage, for being the effective latest ones. I would like to know if there is a way for me to unmask (automatically if possible) all versions BUT the ones, so I have the latest releases but the less CVS/Beta packages as possible. I find autounmask does way too much for me, and does it blindly just like a dumb computer should. so I do it manually. However, you are using -n and at the same time trying to use it without -n... Trying deleting the autounmask files in /etc/portage/package.unmask/, that should go a long way to removing the CVS stuff (which is usually hard masked) leaving just package.keywords. You might have to manually resolve some conflicts now and then though - small price -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Accept all versions but 9999
Well, if anyone cares about it (emo mode) it worked reasonably nice. Actually I had a bit less cvs packages then I originally though, but still I was able to get rid of most of them. Only compiz and scrollkeeper remain. One because of fusion-icon (how can one live without it?) and other cause of some nonsense gnome dependecy. The only real drive-off was some kde-4 and amule-2.2 hardmasking, but nothing that would make me rip my own throat, for now. And for instance, I would apprecciate if you guys made some globalized jokes, I'm a south american and many of the jokes you tell doesn't make too many sense to me (a-ha, now you know why my english is that crappy) (emo mode off) Anyway thanks everyone. And please, be careful with that axe! On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Chris Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alan McKinnon wrote: | On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote: | Alan McKinnon wrote: | | On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote: | | Alan McKinnon wrote: | | | | I do think ... we have hijacked this thread ... was the original | | question answered? | | | | Yes :-) At least until the OP can do some further tests, but he got | | an answer that satisfied him for now | | Oh OK Good then. So what's next ... shall we suffer the vacuum of | space for twenty-nine seconds? | | I honestly don't know what you are on about - this rabbit bone in my | beard must be interfering with my ability to understand plain English. | Or maybe it was the insane conversation with the telephone sanitizer | this morning... | Ok then, a ride on a velvet paisley-covered Chesterfield sofa and we'll drop in on a match at Lord's Cricket Ground. SEP anyone? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH2xI78hUIAnGfls4RAkktAJ9iPegEbZcdzedNvcarp1hOJJ1VzgCePj6H ZvNKAdvoiFWeLDjMr97IQt0= =foVZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG
Re: [gentoo-user] Accept all versions but 9999
Man, I've got many towels, you woudn't believe. You know, it's damn fng hot here, sometimes you need to take 2 baths a day (sorry guys, I know water is as precious as women, but if you come to visit us you'll understand it). And about Marvin, I'm proud to say that I'm the 42 shirt of my university soccer team, kinda nerdy for a computer science student huh? On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Chris Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gustavo Campos wrote: | Well, if anyone cares about it (emo mode) it worked reasonably nice. | Actually I had a bit less cvs packages then I originally though, but | still I was able to get rid of most of them. Only compiz and | scrollkeeper remain. One because of fusion-icon (how can one live | without it?) and other cause of some nonsense gnome dependecy. Damned evil dependencies | The only real drive-off was some kde-4 and amule-2.2 hardmasking, but | nothing that would make me rip my own throat, for now. hardmasks can be a headache if you don't know where to look ... although the clue *is* in the error msg :D | And for instance, I would apprecciate if you guys made some globalized | jokes, I'm a south american and many of the jokes you tell doesn't make | too many sense to me (a-ha, now you know why my english is that crappy) | (emo mode off) | | Anyway thanks everyone. And please, be careful with that axe! Ax aside, do you have a towel? I have mine. Alan has his. But do you have yours? Maybe we should involve Marvin, I think you ought to know I'm feeling very depressed./DA | On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Chris Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | | | Alan McKinnon wrote: | | On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote: | | Alan McKinnon wrote: | | | On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote: | | | Alan McKinnon wrote: | | | | | | I do think ... we have hijacked this thread ... was the original | | | question answered? | | | | | | Yes :-) At least until the OP can do some further tests, but he got | | | an answer that satisfied him for now | | | | Oh OK Good then. So what's next ... shall we suffer the vacuum of | | space for twenty-nine seconds? | | | | I honestly don't know what you are on about - this rabbit bone in my | | beard must be interfering with my ability to understand plain English. | | Or maybe it was the insane conversation with the telephone sanitizer | | this morning... | | | | | Ok then, a ride on a velvet paisley-covered Chesterfield sofa and we'll | drop in on a match at Lord's Cricket Ground. SEP anyone? - -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list | -- | Gustavo Campos | Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH2z4M8hUIAnGfls4RAtoKAJ0YAcMcJgaxI1vKHJOX8pNn86czIwCgkzMX bU6z5MW654SK5ZqTVm1uV0Y= =lyo2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Accept all versions but 9999
Welcome to the Fold! Us nerds should get together and put up the end-all Guide discussions ... should be pretty awesome :D I'm pretty sure we can think an algorithm for that Maybe even an O(n). Hot, Cold, Wet ... it's all the same .. But taking a bath just to make a meaningless and preportedly major decision, now that is a feat wholly on it's own worth noting :D I'd like to say that I believed one day I would run off the bath, naked, screaming eureka, I found the linear-time solution for the travelling salesman, but I'm actually more likely to run off, naked as well, but screaming: damnit, I forgot my lunch on the fire! Gustavo Campos wrote: | Man, I've got many towels, you woudn't believe. | | You know, it's damn fng hot here, sometimes you need to take 2 | baths a day (sorry guys, I know water is as precious as women, but if | you come to visit us you'll understand it). | | And about Marvin, I'm proud to say that I'm the 42 shirt of my | university soccer team, kinda nerdy for a computer science student | huh? | | On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Chris Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | | | Gustavo Campos wrote: | | Well, if anyone cares about it (emo mode) it worked reasonably nice. | | Actually I had a bit less cvs packages then I originally though, but | | still I was able to get rid of most of them. Only compiz and | | scrollkeeper remain. One because of fusion-icon (how can one live | | without it?) and other cause of some nonsense gnome dependecy. | | Damned evil dependencies | | | | The only real drive-off was some kde-4 and amule-2.2 hardmasking, but | | nothing that would make me rip my own throat, for now. | | hardmasks can be a headache if you don't know where to look ... although | the clue *is* in the error msg :D | | | | And for instance, I would apprecciate if you guys made some globalized | | jokes, I'm a south american and many of the jokes you tell doesn't make | | too many sense to me (a-ha, now you know why my english is that crappy) | | (emo mode off) | | | | Anyway thanks everyone. And please, be careful with that axe! | | | Ax aside, do you have a towel? I have mine. Alan has his. But do you | have yours? | | Maybe we should involve Marvin, I think you ought to know I'm feeling | very depressed./DA | | | | | On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Chris Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | | | | | | | Alan McKinnon wrote: | | | On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote: | | | Alan McKinnon wrote: | | | | On Friday 14 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote: | | | | Alan McKinnon wrote: | | | | | | | | I do think ... we have hijacked this thread ... was the original | | | | question answered? | | | | | | | | Yes :-) At least until the OP can do some further tests, but he got | | | | an answer that satisfied him for now | | | | | | Oh OK Good then. So what's next ... shall we suffer the vacuum of | | | space for twenty-nine seconds? | | | | | | I honestly don't know what you are on about - this rabbit bone in my | | | beard must be interfering with my ability to understand plain English. | | | Or maybe it was the insane conversation with the telephone sanitizer | | | this morning... | | | | | | | | | Ok then, a ride on a velvet paisley-covered Chesterfield sofa and we'll | | drop in on a match at Lord's Cricket Ground. SEP anyone? - -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list | | -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH20DN8hUIAnGfls4RAsBUAJ4uFB669Ct2GisTp1IaA+zURkzBxQCfe0DE /wTsTFSjwwt2mNCPa1o0eJ8= =Pl8N -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Accept all versions but 9999
Hi there. I have a stable system (I don't have ~x86 set), but I like to have the latest versions of some specific software (kde, gnome, amarok, alsa, pulseaudio, wine and so on). To achieve that, I've been using autounmask with the parameter -n. When I have a package I want to keep in the latest version, I just autounmask -n package, so all the dependencies are unmasked and no version number is appended. That works fine, but I like to have the latest released versions, which means I usually want to get away from the * ebuilds. The trouble is, when I use autounmask without version numbers, those packages usually are choosen by portage, for being the effective latest ones. I would like to know if there is a way for me to unmask (automatically if possible) all versions BUT the ones, so I have the latest releases but the less CVS/Beta packages as possible. Any ideas? -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite
This should be a nice start: [EMAIL PROTECTED] equery h -p xcomposite [ Searching for USE flag xcomposite in all categories among: ] * installed packages * Portage tree (/usr/portage) [-P-] [ ] kde-base/kwin-3.5.8 (3.5) [-P-] [ ~] kde-base/kwin-3.5.9 (3.5) [-P-] [M~] kde-base/kdebase-3.5.9-r1 (3.5) [-P-] [M~] x11-wm/enlightenment-0.16.8.9 (0) [-P-] [ ] x11-wm/enlightenment-0.16.8.8 (0) [I--] [ ~] kde-base/krunner-4.0.2 (kde-4) [I--] [ ~] kde-base/plasma-4.0.2 (kde-4) [-P-] [ ] kde-base/kdebase-3.5.8-r6 (3.5) [-P-] [ ] xfce-base/xfwm4-4.4.1-r1 (0) [I--] [ ~] kde-base/libtaskmanager-4.0.2 (kde-4) [-P-] [ ~] kde-base/libtaskmanager-4.0.1 (kde-4) [I--] [ ~] kde-base/kwin-4.0.2 (kde-4) [-P-] [M~] kde-base/kdebase-4.0.1 (kde-4) [-P-] [M ] xfce-base/xfwm4-4.4.1 (0) [-P-] [ ] xfce-base/xfwm4-4.4.2 (0) [-P-] [M~] x11-wm/enlightenment-0.16.8.12 (0) [-P-] [ ] x11-wm/enlightenment-0.16.8.11 (0) [-P-] [ ] x11-wm/enlightenment-0.16.8.10 (0) [-P-] [ ] kde-base/kicker-3.5.8 (3.5) [-P-] [M~] kde-base/kicker-3.5.9 (3.5) [-P-] [M~] kde-base/kdebase-3.5.9 (3.5) [-P-] [ ~] kde-base/plasma-4.0.1 (kde-4) [-P-] [ ~] kde-base/krunner-4.0.1-r1 (kde-4) [-P-] [M~] x11-wm/matchbox-window-manager-1.1 (0) [-P-] [M~] x11-wm/matchbox-window-manager-1.2 (0) [-P-] [M ] x11-wm/enlightenment-0.16. (0) [-P-] [ ~] kde-base/kwin-4.0.1 (kde-4) On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote: I have 3.5 as monolithic and 4.0 meta. What concerns me is that adding xcomposite will not re-emerge anything from 4.0 - and there is where I need/want it. OK, I see what you mean. Try this hacked-together list instead: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/portage/kde-base $ cd /var/portage/kde-base/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/portage/kde-base $ grep -ir composite * | grep '4.0' | grep ebuild | cut -f1 -d: | sort | uniq kdebase/kdebase-4.0.1.ebuild kdelibs/kdelibs-4.0.1-r1.ebuild kdelibs/kdelibs-4.0.2.ebuild krunner/krunner-4.0.1-r1.ebuild krunner/krunner-4.0.2.ebuild kwin/kwin-4.0.1.ebuild kwin/kwin-4.0.2.ebuild libtaskmanager/libtaskmanager-4.0.1.ebuild libtaskmanager/libtaskmanager-4.0.2.ebuild plasma/plasma-4.0.1.ebuild plasma/plasma-4.0.2.ebuild Short version: kdelibs krunner kwin libtaskmanager plasma -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 4.0.2 and composite
Should be enough enable the use flag on your make.conf (xcomposite) and emerge -uvaDN world. Portage will take care of re-compiling only the packages whose USE flag has changed. On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, I emerged KDE 4.0.2 without composite in my xorg. Meanwhile I have found out how to enable composite (and 2D and 3D acceleration) with my graphics chipset. Now I'd like to re-compile KDE with composite enabled. Anybody in the know *what* parts of KDE I have to re-emerge? (Wouldn't like to do the whole thing.) Uwe -- Informal Linux Group Namibia: http://www.linux.org.na/ SysEx (Pty) Ltd.: http://www.SysEx.com.na/ -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
