Re: [gentoo-user] Re: octave won't run
Ian: > On 2020-02-06 09:56, Mick wrote: > > > Otherwise the latest sci-libs/lapack is 3.8.0, so your links above look > > correct as far as I can tell. > > Note that sci-libs/lapack and sci-libs/lapack-reference are 2 distinct > packages. The OP presumably has the latter. > > Both of them existing may be the real bug here. The refrence one isn't installed: # emerge --search sci-libs/lapack-reference [ Results for search key : sci-libs/lapack-reference ] Searching... * sci-libs/blas-reference Latest version available: 20070226-r4 Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ] Size of files: 5208 KiB Homepage: http://www.netlib.org/blas/ Description: Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms F77 reference implementations License: BSD * sci-libs/lapack-reference Latest version available: 3.2.1-r4 Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ] Size of files: 4694 KiB Homepage: http://www.netlib.org/lapack/index.html Description: FORTRAN reference implementation of LAPACK Linear Algebra PACKage License: BSD Regards, /Karl Hammar
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: octave won't run
200206 Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2020-02-06 09:56, Mick wrote: >> Otherwise the latest sci-libs/lapack is 3.8.0, > so your links above look correct as far as I can tell. > Note that sci-libs/lapack and sci-libs/lapack-reference > are 2 distinct packages. The OP presumably has the latter. > Both of them existing may be the real bug here. FWIW my own set-up seems to support that. 872: ~> ls -l /usr/lib64/liblapack.* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Nov 16 17:11 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so -> liblapack.so.3 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Nov 16 17:11 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so.3 -> liblapack.so.3.8.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6637008 Nov 16 17:11 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so.3.8.0 873: ~> When I checked earlier today, there were broken symlinks to lapack-reference , but deleting them made no difference : the pkg isn't installed. Octave opens & calculates '1+1' without any problems. So the solution to the OP's problem mb simply to unmerge lapack-reference . -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: octave won't run
Am Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 18:45:12 CET schrieb Ian Zimmerman:
> On 2020-02-06 09:56, Mick wrote:
> > Otherwise the latest sci-libs/lapack is 3.8.0, so your links above look
> > correct as far as I can tell.
>
> Note that sci-libs/lapack and sci-libs/lapack-reference are 2 distinct
> packages. The OP presumably has the latter.
>
> Both of them existing may be the real bug here.
You motivated me to look this up on my system, and I don't think that's right:
- octave depends on virtual/lapack, and
- virtual/lapack does *not* depend on lapack-reference:
RDEPEND="
>=sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0[eselect-ldso?]
eselect-ldso? ( || (
>=sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0[eselect-ldso]
sci-libs/openblas[eselect-ldso] ) )
"
DEPEND="${RDEPEND}"
Note also that lapack-reference has no eselect-ldso USE flag, which Karl
changed as per one of his other emails.
Karl, what exactly is the error message you get? Can you find anything
related on bugs.gentoo.org? FWIW, my octave installation starts just fine,
but I use openblas:
% eselect lapack list
Available LAPACK (lib) candidates:
(none found)
Available LAPACK (lib64) candidates:
[1] openblas *
[2] reference
% eselect blas list
Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib) candidates:
(none found)
Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib64) candidates:
[1] openblas *
[2] reference
HTH
--
Marc Joliet
--
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-user] Re: octave won't run
On 2020-02-06 09:56, Mick wrote: > Otherwise the latest sci-libs/lapack is 3.8.0, so your links above look > correct as far as I can tell. Note that sci-libs/lapack and sci-libs/lapack-reference are 2 distinct packages. The OP presumably has the latter. Both of them existing may be the real bug here. -- Ian
