Re: [gentoo-user] Wrong SHA512 checksum for 20160630 amd64 minimal installation medium

[Marvin Gülker]

Am Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:07:03 +0100
schrieb Stroller :
> This doesn't address the wider implications of this dodgy checksums,
> but I think most people on this list install using SystemRescueCD.

Okay, I’ll go that route then. Thank you again!

Greetings
Marvin

-- 
Blog: http://www.guelkerdev.de
PGP/GPG ID: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F

Re: [gentoo-user] Wrong SHA512 checksum for 20160630 amd64 minimal installation medium

[R0b0t1]

And people look at you funny when you request a physical copy of the GPG key...

:|

Re: [gentoo-user] Wrong SHA512 checksum for 20160630 amd64 minimal installation medium

[Stroller]

> On 5 Jul 2016, at 12:57, Marvin Gülker  wrote:
> 
> Are the amd64 images all
> corrupt, and thus should not be used for installation? If so, they
> should not be linked to on the main download site.

This doesn't address the wider implications of this dodgy checksums, but I 
think most people on this list install using SystemRescueCD.

It's basically the same as Gentoo's install CDs, but with some minor extra 
features (although I can't remember what they are) which make it a bit better.

The problems you describe certainly should be fixed, but if you want to get on 
with installing Gentoo today, it's SystemRescueCD I'd use.

Stroller.

Re: [gentoo-user] Wrong SHA512 checksum for 20160630 amd64 minimal installation medium

[Marvin Gülker]

Am Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:26:50 +0300
schrieb Andrew Savchenko :

> Checksums are indeed wrong, whirlpool one too. Thanks for noticing,
> I opened a bug for this:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588062

Okay, thank you. This has been now marked as a duplicate of another
bug[1], which in turn links to a message on the gentoo-mirrors ML[2]
from about a month ago.

I am not sure I understand the implications. Are the amd64 images all
corrupt, and thus should not be used for installation? If so, they
should not be linked to on the main download site. If not, can someone
with access to the GPG signing key please publish the correct checksums
signed somewhere so we have an interim workaround?

> In future please file bugs for similar issues right ahead.

Noted.

Greetings
Marvin

[1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581638
[2]:
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-mirrors/message/a9fbc7213f832e9918784bb8d334628b

-- 
Blog: http://www.guelkerdev.de
PGP/GPG ID: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F

Re: [gentoo-user] Wrong SHA512 checksum for 20160630 amd64 minimal installation medium

[Andrew Savchenko]

Hi,

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 09:57:02 +0200 Marvin Gülker wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I was wanting to give Gentoo a try today, but failed to verify the
> current minimal installation medium for amd64[1]. The .iso file does
> not match the SHA512 checksum provided in the .DIGESTS.ASC file[2]. The
> wrong checksum was confirmed by a user in the #gentoo IRC channel on
> freenode.net as well.
> 
> FYI, the wrong checksum is:
> 
> f04f987f5e94a1aa8c9ffc8a08c3bdbed0afd44f680342738d504b7149b9e6bbc49ee1fad851d7eef89103e43fefacaa57e6c7f768d164c3c4e77612e6847a35
> install-amd64-minimal-20160630.iso
> 
> Can this please be fixed?
> Thanks!

Checksums are indeed wrong, whirlpool one too. Thanks for noticing,
I opened a bug for this:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588062

In future please file bugs for similar issues right ahead.

Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko


pgpW5TvIkDsQz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-user] Wrong SHA512 checksum for 20160630 amd64 minimal installation medium

[Marvin Gülker]

Hi everyone,

I was wanting to give Gentoo a try today, but failed to verify the
current minimal installation medium for amd64[1]. The .iso file does
not match the SHA512 checksum provided in the .DIGESTS.ASC file[2]. The
wrong checksum was confirmed by a user in the #gentoo IRC channel on
freenode.net as well.

FYI, the wrong checksum is:

f04f987f5e94a1aa8c9ffc8a08c3bdbed0afd44f680342738d504b7149b9e6bbc49ee1fad851d7eef89103e43fefacaa57e6c7f768d164c3c4e77612e6847a35
install-amd64-minimal-20160630.iso

Can this please be fixed?
Thanks!

Marvin

[1]:
http://distfiles.gentoo.org/releases/amd64/autobuilds/current-install-amd64-minimal/install-amd64-minimal-20160630.iso
[2]:
http://distfiles.gentoo.org/releases/amd64/autobuilds/current-install-amd64-minimal/install-amd64-minimal-20160630.iso.DIGESTS.asc

-- 
Blog: http://www.guelkerdev.de
PGP/GPG ID: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F