Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Raymond Lewis Rebbeck
On Wednesday, 31 May 2006 21:31, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
 Hi folks:

 A few months back, I went through a phase where I built several
 computers via the gentoo installer disk,  they work, but they are not as
 well optimized as I would like.  I have successfully destroyed 5 of them
 trying to fix the use flags, so after that im to the point of asking for
 some help :) --

Too much optimisation can be a bad thing.


 My IDS box is the next one on the list to be fixed.  I would like to be
 able to rebuild the kernel for what I use it for - -No problem there --
 that's simple.  And I would like to take out all the unused use flags
 and replace them with a basic set - -this is where I have gotten into
 trouble before on the other systems -- I can edit them in make.conf so I
 have what I want - right now it looks like I will be using

 USE=apache2 dev/lang-php mysql -ipv6 -mmx -mp3 -nls -xmms -alsa -arts

What is dev/lang-php doing in there? If your intention is for the mysql USE 
flag to only apply to dev/lang-php then put the line 'dev-lang/php mysql' 
into /etc/portage/package.use

Also mmx is not a default USE flag, specifically disabling it is redundant.


 Knowing that, once I edit make.conf, what do I need to do next to get
 stuff re-compiled etc?

if you had looked at the emerge man page you'd have noticed the 'N' argument.


 Any other recommendation etc???

My recommendation is to not touch any USE flags that you don't understand. The 
defaults are usually perfectly fine unless you have a good reason to disable 
particular flags.

I would also recommend that you go through and read all the portage 
documentation.


 Thanks

 TIM


 Timothy A. Holmes
 IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher

 Medina Christian Academy
 A Higher Standard...

 Jeremiah 33:3
 Jeremiah 29:11
 Esther 4:14

-- 
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Timothy A. Holmes


 -Original Message-
 From: Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 8:22 AM
 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer
 
 On Wednesday, 31 May 2006 21:31, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
  Hi folks:
 
  A few months back, I went through a phase where I built several
  computers via the gentoo installer disk,  they work, but they are
not as
  well optimized as I would like.  I have successfully destroyed 5 of
them
  trying to fix the use flags, so after that im to the point of asking
for
  some help :) --
 
 Too much optimisation can be a bad thing.
 
 
  My IDS box is the next one on the list to be fixed.  I would like to
be
  able to rebuild the kernel for what I use it for - -No problem there
--
  that's simple.  And I would like to take out all the unused use
flags
  and replace them with a basic set - -this is where I have gotten
into
  trouble before on the other systems -- I can edit them in make.conf
so I
  have what I want - right now it looks like I will be using
 
  USE=apache2 dev/lang-php mysql -ipv6 -mmx -mp3 -nls -xmms -alsa
-arts
 
 What is dev/lang-php doing in there? If your intention is for the
mysql
 USE
 flag to only apply to dev/lang-php then put the line 'dev-lang/php
mysql'
 into /etc/portage/package.use
 
 Also mmx is not a default USE flag, specifically disabling it is
 redundant.
 
 
  Knowing that, once I edit make.conf, what do I need to do next to
get
  stuff re-compiled etc?
 
 if you had looked at the emerge man page you'd have noticed the 'N'
 argument.
 
 
  Any other recommendation etc???
 
 My recommendation is to not touch any USE flags that you don't
understand.
 The
 defaults are usually perfectly fine unless you have a good reason to
 disable
 particular flags.
 
 I would also recommend that you go through and read all the portage
 documentation.
 
 
  Thanks
 
  TIM
 
 
  Timothy A. Holmes
  IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher
 
  Medina Christian Academy
  A Higher Standard...
 
  Jeremiah 33:3
  Jeremiah 29:11
  Esther 4:14
 
 --
 Raymond Lewis Rebbeck
 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[Timothy A. Holmes] 


Raymond - the dev-lang/php use flag is there to pull in the PHP stuff as
BASE requires it.

The -mmx and several of the others are there to keep conky from pulling
in a bunch of stuff as well that it does not need

Thanks

TIM



Timothy A. Holmes
IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher
 
Medina Christian Academy
A Higher Standard...
 
Jeremiah 33:3
Jeremiah 29:11
Esther 4:14



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Raymond Lewis Rebbeck
I believe you're looking for the 'php' USE flag. dev-lang/php is not a USE 
flag it's the php package.

As I stated previously, mmx is not set by default, so '-mmx' is redundant.

On Wednesday, 31 May 2006 21:59, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:

 [Timothy A. Holmes]


 Raymond - the dev-lang/php use flag is there to pull in the PHP stuff as
 BASE requires it.

 The -mmx and several of the others are there to keep conky from pulling
 in a bunch of stuff as well that it does not need

 Thanks

 TIM



 Timothy A. Holmes
 IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher

 Medina Christian Academy
 A Higher Standard...

 Jeremiah 33:3
 Jeremiah 29:11
 Esther 4:14

-- 
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Hans-Werner Hilse
Hi,

On Wed, 31 May 2006 08:29:49 -0400 Timothy A. Holmes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Raymond - the dev-lang/php use flag is there to pull in the PHP stuff
 as BASE requires it.

What makes you think there's
a) a slash-notation in USE flags
b) this specific USE flag?
dev-lang/php really looks like a package specification, not a USE flag.

And: What is BASE?

 The -mmx and several of the others are there to keep conky from
 pulling in a bunch of stuff as well that it does not need

When mmx isn't set by default there's no good reason to disable it,
right?

Make sure that you have understood what USE flags really do. As you're
talking about a IDS, my suggestion would even be to start with all USE
flags unset by default, i.e. your USE variable in /etc/make.conf should
start with -* then. You'll probably want to add some of these to the
default flags, too: nptl nptlonly ssl zlib jpeg png alsa ncurses pic
nls pam. You can then specify further package specific refinements
in /etc/portage/package.use. For an explanation what is happening at
all, see man portage and man make.conf.

-hwh
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 31 May 2006 08:29:49 -0400, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:

 Raymond - the dev-lang/php use flag is there to pull in the PHP stuff as
 BASE requires it.

dev-lang/php is not a valid USE flag, php is.

If a program installed via portage requires php, portage will install it
as a dependency of that program. USE flags only affect optional
dependencies, such as when a program can be built with or without php
support.

You really should read the USE flag documentation before messing with
them too much. Along with the flexibility it brings, Gentoo gives you a
great deal of power to totally fsck your system by fiddling with things
you don't understand.

One would have thought that after destroying five systems in this way,
you would have resorted to the documentation.

Check /usr/portage/profiles/use.*desc for descriptions of all USE flags
and 'emerge --info' to see which are in effect on your system.

Finally, don't change to many at once, and keep track of what you have
done. that way, if things do go wrong, you can retrace your steps and
find the cause (and solution).


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Jimmy Hoffa is buried here -- X


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


RE: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Timothy A. Holmes
 On Wed, 31 May 2006 08:29:49 -0400, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
 
  Raymond - the dev-lang/php use flag is there to pull in the PHP
stuff as
  BASE requires it.
 
 dev-lang/php is not a valid USE flag, php is.
 
 If a program installed via portage requires php, portage will install
it
 as a dependency of that program. USE flags only affect optional
 dependencies, such as when a program can be built with or without php
 support.
 
 You really should read the USE flag documentation before messing with
 them too much. Along with the flexibility it brings, Gentoo gives you
a
 great deal of power to totally fsck your system by fiddling with
things
 you don't understand.
 
 One would have thought that after destroying five systems in this way,
 you would have resorted to the documentation.
 
 Check /usr/portage/profiles/use.*desc for descriptions of all USE
flags
 and 'emerge --info' to see which are in effect on your system.
 
 Finally, don't change to many at once, and keep track of what you have
 done. that way, if things do go wrong, you can retrace your steps and
 find the cause (and solution).
 
 
 --
 Neil Bothwick
 
 Jimmy Hoffa is buried here -- X 
[Timothy A. Holmes] 

Neil and others:

Thanks for the input, you are correct, I accidentally put a package
specification into the original post rather than the appropriate use
flag -- my goof

The USE line that I want should look more like:

USE=php session cli gd pear apache2 mysql ssl png jpeg gif

This USE Specification comes from the WIKI article about the
installation of Snort and BASE found at:

http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Setup_BASE_with_Apache,_Snort,_and_PostgreS
QL

With two slight changes 


1. I use MySQL rather than postgreSQL
2. I am not using hardened sources or hardened php

I am rapidly getting the idea that either leaving the system alone, or
just wiping it out and starting over is going to be preferable to trying
to repair this one, since no one can seem to tell me if it can be done.
My original thought was to simply change the use flags to those that I
wanted, and emerge -e world, apparently, this is not correct?

As far as portage documentation, I have not been able to find a wiki
article or other document that indicates how to change from a system
created by the installer disk to one that is personally optimized.  If
there is such a document, I will be most happy to read it, as it would
really simplify things.

I do understand that there is significant power in the USE flags, and
after having destroyed 5 systems, I came to the group asking for help to
avoid making a similar mistake again.  

The portage docs that I have seen so far (specifically those in the
gentoo handbook), do not SEEM (that I have found) to cover this type of
eventuality, but rather provide a general guide line for its use.
Again, If I have missed the appropriate doc someplace, please let me
know.  


To answer Raymonds question specifically, BASE is the web interface and
reporting engine that I use for the SNORT IDS, and it is the reason that
php and mysql and apache2 are in the list


I will freely admit that my understanding of portage and the USE flags
is somewhat limited, and that is part of the reason that I came to the
group for help rather than just blindly plunging ahead as I did
previously. 

I have read the wiki document about the USE flags, and I refer to that
chart routinely as I am trying to construct these statements.

http://www.gentoo.org/dyn/use-index.xml

This is the document that I have been using, if there is a better one
available on the web, I am quite open to using it, if someone can please
send me a link. 

Thank you all for your time and your help - -I greatly appreciate it

TIM


Timothy A. Holmes
IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher
 
Medina Christian Academy
A Higher Standard...
 
Jeremiah 33:3
Jeremiah 29:11
Esther 4:14



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 31 May 2006 09:53:05 -0400, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:

 I am rapidly getting the idea that either leaving the system alone, or
 just wiping it out and starting over is going to be preferable to trying
 to repair this one, since no one can seem to tell me if it can be done.
 My original thought was to simply change the use flags to those that I
 wanted, and emerge -e world, apparently, this is not correct?

Re-emerging everything is unnecessary, especially if you are only
changing a few flags.

emerge -uavDN world

will re-emerge everything affected by your changed flags, and allow you
to see what it is going to do before it starts. If you have any doubt as
to what an emerge will do, run it with --verbose and either --pretend or
--ask first.

 As far as portage documentation, I have not been able to find a wiki
 article or other document that indicates how to change from a system
 created by the installer disk to one that is personally optimized.

Therein lies one of the problems with the installer. The manual
installation requires you to gain some understanding of how Gentoo works
in order to build a system. That understanding is also needed to
administer the system. By using the installer, you bypass the initial
learning curve which, paradoxically, can make things more difficult in
the long run.

I am going to suggest a course of action that I normally find totally
pointless, re-install. If you build your system again without the
installer, you will be able to configure it to suit your needs from
scratch, and you will have a greater understanding of the system, making
it easier to maintain.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Bother, said Pooh, as the Death Star exploded around him.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


RE: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Timothy A. Holmes



 -Original Message-
 From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 10:41 AM
 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer
 
 On Wed, 31 May 2006 09:53:05 -0400, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
 
  I am rapidly getting the idea that either leaving the system alone,
or
  just wiping it out and starting over is going to be preferable to
trying
  to repair this one, since no one can seem to tell me if it can be
done.
  My original thought was to simply change the use flags to those that
I
  wanted, and emerge -e world, apparently, this is not correct?
 
 Re-emerging everything is unnecessary, especially if you are only
 changing a few flags.
 
 emerge -uavDN world
 
 will re-emerge everything affected by your changed flags, and allow
you
 to see what it is going to do before it starts. If you have any doubt
as
 to what an emerge will do, run it with --verbose and either --pretend
or
 --ask first.
 
  As far as portage documentation, I have not been able to find a wiki
  article or other document that indicates how to change from a system
  created by the installer disk to one that is personally optimized.
 
 Therein lies one of the problems with the installer. The manual
 installation requires you to gain some understanding of how Gentoo
works
 in order to build a system. That understanding is also needed to
 administer the system. By using the installer, you bypass the initial
 learning curve which, paradoxically, can make things more difficult in
 the long run.
 
 I am going to suggest a course of action that I normally find totally
 pointless, re-install. If you build your system again without the
 installer, you will be able to configure it to suit your needs from
 scratch, and you will have a greater understanding of the system,
making
 it easier to maintain.
 
 
 --
 Neil Bothwick
 
 Bother, said Pooh, as the Death Star exploded around him. 
[Timothy A. Holmes] 

Neil - 

I understand your suggestion -- I used the installer as an attempted
shortcut after having done several (5+) installs via the basic disk and
the handbook.  I have paid for that error in spades - believe me --
since then I have done an additional 5 or so installations by hand from
the basic disk.  I understand the processes there, I was hoping to
rescue the additional time for the snort install etc by being able to
just recompile stuff rather than have to start over from the beginning,
the system is currently running, so I may just end up putting off the
rebuild till this summer when I have a bit more time -- I was hoping to
be able to change the use flags, build a new kernel and be done with it,
but that doesn't look to be the case

Thanks again

TIM


Timothy A. Holmes
IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher
 
Medina Christian Academy
A Higher Standard...
 
Jeremiah 33:3
Jeremiah 29:11
Esther 4:14


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Michael Crute

On 5/31/06, Timothy A. Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Neil -

I understand your suggestion -- I used the installer as an attempted
shortcut after having done several (5+) installs via the basic disk and
the handbook.  I have paid for that error in spades - believe me --
since then I have done an additional 5 or so installations by hand from
the basic disk.  I understand the processes there, I was hoping to
rescue the additional time for the snort install etc by being able to
just recompile stuff rather than have to start over from the beginning,
the system is currently running, so I may just end up putting off the
rebuild till this summer when I have a bit more time -- I was hoping to
be able to change the use flags, build a new kernel and be done with it,
but that doesn't look to be the case


Tim...

I concur with Neil's assessment that you should just wipe the box and
start afresh, the main reason being that you should be running
hardened sources and USE=-* instead of trying to do a basic install.
Security related boxes such as firewalls, routers, and IDS should be a
slim as possible to eliminate potential for security holes and in all
cases they should be running with the hardened profile. Just my $0.02.

-Mike


--

Michael E. Crute
http://mike.crute.org

It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes.
--Douglas Adams
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Timothy A. Holmes


 On 5/31/06, Timothy A. Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Neil -
 
  I understand your suggestion -- I used the installer as an attempted
  shortcut after having done several (5+) installs via the basic disk
and
  the handbook.  I have paid for that error in spades - believe me --
  since then I have done an additional 5 or so installations by hand
from
  the basic disk.  I understand the processes there, I was hoping to
  rescue the additional time for the snort install etc by being able
to
  just recompile stuff rather than have to start over from the
beginning,
  the system is currently running, so I may just end up putting off
the
  rebuild till this summer when I have a bit more time -- I was hoping
to
  be able to change the use flags, build a new kernel and be done with
it,
  but that doesn't look to be the case
 
 Tim...
 
 I concur with Neil's assessment that you should just wipe the box and
 start afresh, the main reason being that you should be running
 hardened sources and USE=-* instead of trying to do a basic install.
 Security related boxes such as firewalls, routers, and IDS should be a
 slim as possible to eliminate potential for security holes and in all
 cases they should be running with the hardened profile. Just my $0.02.
 
 -Mike

[Timothy A. Holmes] 

Mike and Neil -- Ok -- sounds good to me -- 

At this point then, I am going to actually build a second box for snort
perhaps using the hardened sources (I am not in the least comfortable
with running hardened on a production box).  This will allow me to get
things working and evaluate the stability of the hardened sources in my
production environment.

Thanks a bunch for the input 

TIM


Timothy A. Holmes
IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher
 
Medina Christian Academy
A Higher Standard...
 
Jeremiah 33:3
Jeremiah 29:11
Esther 4:14


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 31 May 2006 10:46:18 -0400, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:

 I was hoping to
 rescue the additional time for the snort install etc by being able to
 just recompile stuff rather than have to start over from the beginning,
 the system is currently running, so I may just end up putting off the
 rebuild till this summer when I have a bit more time -- I was hoping to
 be able to change the use flags, build a new kernel and be done with it,
 but that doesn't look to be the case

It should be the case. it's not much different from doing a stage 3
install then changing USE flags etc. I've done that with no problems.
What went wrong when you tried this before, or was it a case of changing
too much at once so you couldn't find the source of the problem?

However, Michael's point about starting afresh with a hardened setup is a
good one. It sounds much safer for a security box.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

getting performance from an Amiga is like getting water from a sponge,
getting performance from Windows is like getting blood from a stone -
after banging my head against the stone several times I got some blood
Author of Lightwave 3D


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


RE: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Timothy A. Holmes



 -Original Message-
 From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 11:57 AM
 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer
 
 On Wed, 31 May 2006 10:46:18 -0400, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
 
  I was hoping to
  rescue the additional time for the snort install etc by being able
to
  just recompile stuff rather than have to start over from the
beginning,
  the system is currently running, so I may just end up putting off
the
  rebuild till this summer when I have a bit more time -- I was hoping
to
  be able to change the use flags, build a new kernel and be done with
it,
  but that doesn't look to be the case
 
 It should be the case. it's not much different from doing a stage 3
 install then changing USE flags etc. I've done that with no problems.
 What went wrong when you tried this before, or was it a case of
changing
 too much at once so you couldn't find the source of the problem?
 
 However, Michael's point about starting afresh with a hardened setup
is a
 good one. It sounds much safer for a security box.
 
 
 --
 Neil Bothwick
 
 getting performance from an Amiga is like getting water from a
sponge,
 getting performance from Windows is like getting blood from a stone -
 after banging my head against the stone several times I got some
blood
 Author of Lightwave 3D 
[Timothy A. Holmes] 

Neil:

the problem before was an incomplete understanding of how the USE Flags
worked, and a mis-understanding of some advice that I was given.  The
procedure that I used last time was:

rebuild the kernel
Set use to USE=-*
Emerge -e world

That procedure with the USE flags is what killed me.  What I should have
done -- it now appears was to set use to blank (or comment it out) and
allow it to use the base flags from the profile.  But trying to
recompile from base with all use flags specifically excluded is what
began to break stuff 

TIM



Timothy A. Holmes
IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher
 
Medina Christian Academy
A Higher Standard...
 
Jeremiah 33:3
Jeremiah 29:11
Esther 4:14


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 31 May 2006 12:01:05 -0400, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:

 the problem before was an incomplete understanding of how the USE Flags
 worked, and a mis-understanding of some advice that I was given.  The
 procedure that I used last time was:
 
 rebuild the kernel

Fine

 Set use to USE=-*

Aaargh!

 Emerge -e world

Unnecessary, but normally harmless.

 That procedure with the USE flags is what killed me.

Yes. Some USE flags are required, such as readline.

 What I should have
 done -- it now appears was to set use to blank (or comment it out) and
 allow it to use the base flags from the profile.

Yes, and then remove USE flags a few at a time, with USE=-xxx -yyy -zzz
and recompile to see the effect.

 But trying to
 recompile from base with all use flags specifically excluded is what
 began to break stuff 

You may have been able to recover by booting from the live CD, chrooting
into the system and rebuilding with fixed USE flags, but the system may
have been to hosed to allow this.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Beware of low-flying butterflies.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Rumen Yotov
Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 11:57 AM
 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

 On Wed, 31 May 2006 10:46:18 -0400, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:

 I was hoping to
 rescue the additional time for the snort install etc by being able
 to
 just recompile stuff rather than have to start over from the
 beginning,
 the system is currently running, so I may just end up putting off
 the
 rebuild till this summer when I have a bit more time -- I was hoping
 to
 be able to change the use flags, build a new kernel and be done with
 it,
 but that doesn't look to be the case
 It should be the case. it's not much different from doing a stage 3
 install then changing USE flags etc. I've done that with no problems.
 What went wrong when you tried this before, or was it a case of
 changing
 too much at once so you couldn't find the source of the problem?

 However, Michael's point about starting afresh with a hardened setup
 is a
 good one. It sounds much safer for a security box.


 --
 Neil Bothwick

 getting performance from an Amiga is like getting water from a
 sponge,
 getting performance from Windows is like getting blood from a stone -
 after banging my head against the stone several times I got some
 blood
 Author of Lightwave 3D 
 [Timothy A. Holmes] 
 
 Neil:
 
 the problem before was an incomplete understanding of how the USE Flags
 worked, and a mis-understanding of some advice that I was given.  The
 procedure that I used last time was:
 
 rebuild the kernel
 Set use to USE=-*
 Emerge -e world
 
 That procedure with the USE flags is what killed me.  What I should have
 done -- it now appears was to set use to blank (or comment it out) and
 allow it to use the base flags from the profile.  But trying to
 recompile from base with all use flags specifically excluded is what
 began to break stuff 
 
 TIM
 
 
 
 Timothy A. Holmes
 IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher
  
 Medina Christian Academy
 A Higher Standard...
  
 Jeremiah 33:3
 Jeremiah 29:11
 Esther 4:14
 
 
Hi,
Don't just wipe out all USE-flags IIRC you'll need readline ncurses...
Search mail-list archives for minimal USE flags, a year or more ago
(mail was from ciaranm IIRC).
HTH.Rumen


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Ryan Tandy

Timothy A. Holmes wrote:

I have read the wiki document about the USE flags, and I refer to that
chart routinely as I am trying to construct these statements.

http://www.gentoo.org/dyn/use-index.xml

This is the document that I have been using, if there is a better one
available on the web, I am quite open to using it, if someone can please
send me a link.


Don't restrict yourself to wikis and web-based information.  The best 
portage and emerge manuals are exactly that - the portage and emerge 
manuals.


$ man 5 portage
$ man 1 emerge
$ man 5 make.conf

Once you've thoroughly read and understood all three of those, come back 
here.

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Ryan Tandy

Timothy A. Holmes wrote:

At this point then, I am going to actually build a second box for snort
perhaps using the hardened sources (I am not in the least comfortable
with running hardened on a production box).


Wrong.  The correct sentiment should be I am not in the least 
comfortable with running NON-hardened on a production box. :)


ESPECIALLY for network-accessible devices.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Timothy A. Holmes



 -Original Message-
 From: Ryan Tandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 2:11 PM
 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer
 
 Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
  At this point then, I am going to actually build a second box for
snort
  perhaps using the hardened sources (I am not in the least
comfortable
  with running hardened on a production box).
 
 Wrong.  The correct sentiment should be I am not in the least
 comfortable with running NON-hardened on a production box. :)
 
 ESPECIALLY for network-accessible devices.
 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[Timothy A. Holmes] 

Randy:

That may be, however, I have seen far to many complaints about
instability in the hardened systems to be comfortable using them in a
production environment.  Another user here in my area is working to
change my mind, but at this point, unless something changes
dramatically, hardened in my mind is a specialty subset for very
isolated applications that are very very crash tolerant.  The problem in
my mind is that if the system is so unstable that it will not properly
function with a major component like X, I am worried that it may prove
unstable with other applications as well.  It seems quite often that I
see messages going past someone has had a problem with hardened and more
often then not, these are fairly critical problems -- while it may be
that hardened sources are fine, I have high doubts about them, and
specifically their stability.  I realize that this topic has the
potential to very quickly become a flame fest, and I have no desire for
this to happen, but at the same time, I cant risk a critical system on
unstable sources either.  I am open to the possibility of using them,
BUT, for now it will be in parallel with sources that I KNOW work
correctly.  I cant risk our network to be part of an experiment.


Timothy A. Holmes
IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher
 
Medina Christian Academy
A Higher Standard...
 
Jeremiah 33:3
Jeremiah 29:11
Esther 4:14


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Timothy A. Holmes
Ra


 -Original Message-
 From: Ryan Tandy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 2:08 PM
 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer
 
 Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
  I have read the wiki document about the USE flags, and I refer to
that
  chart routinely as I am trying to construct these statements.
 
  http://www.gentoo.org/dyn/use-index.xml
 
  This is the document that I have been using, if there is a better
one
  available on the web, I am quite open to using it, if someone can
please
  send me a link.
 
 Don't restrict yourself to wikis and web-based information.  The best
 portage and emerge manuals are exactly that - the portage and emerge
 manuals.
 
 $ man 5 portage
 $ man 1 emerge
 $ man 5 make.conf
 
 Once you've thoroughly read and understood all three of those, come
back
 here.
 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[Timothy A. Holmes] 

Ryan - -

Thanks for the links - 

Is that info also accessable on the web some place, since I cant print
from linux based systems, and especially cant under the live CD?

I will be most interested to read it, but the manpage reader is horrible
to try to work from

TIM




Timothy A. Holmes
IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher
 
Medina Christian Academy
A Higher Standard...
 
Jeremiah 33:3
Jeremiah 29:11
Esther 4:14


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Timothy A. Holmes
 
 [Timothy A. Holmes]
 
 Randy:
 
 That may be, however, I have seen far to many complaints about
 instability in the hardened systems to be comfortable using them in a
 production environment.  Another user here in my area is working to

[Timothy A. Holmes] 
 
OOPS _- that should be RYAN -- SORRY -- I got fumble fingered

TIM


Timothy A. Holmes
IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher
 
Medina Christian Academy
A Higher Standard...
 
Jeremiah 33:3
Jeremiah 29:11
Esther 4:14


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Ryan Tandy

Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
 
OOPS _- that should be RYAN -- SORRY -- I got fumble fingered




Everyone does it the first time. :)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread kashani

Ryan Tandy wrote:

Timothy A. Holmes wrote:

At this point then, I am going to actually build a second box for snort
perhaps using the hardened sources (I am not in the least comfortable
with running hardened on a production box).


Wrong.  The correct sentiment should be I am not in the least 
comfortable with running NON-hardened on a production box. :)


ESPECIALLY for network-accessible devices.


	While true the first time moving to hardened sources is interesting 
at minimum and downright painful at its worst. The time is worth it, but 
you will break and app or two as well as pull some hair out along the 
way depending on the complexity of your environment. However if you're 
building a new system do it now if possible rather than after you've got 
your applications working or you'll fall victim to the don't fix what 
isn't broken rule. :)


kashani
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Teresa and Dale
Daniel da Veiga wrote:




 Neil:

 the problem before was an incomplete understanding of how the USE Flags
 worked, and a mis-understanding of some advice that I was given.  The
 procedure that I used last time was:

 rebuild the kernel
 Set use to USE=-*
 Emerge -e world


 I broke my system this way once...


You are not the only one.  I have read where several have broken their
systems with that line.  I think there is a thread on the forums with
all the tears they shed trying to get it all working again.

snip


Dale
:-)  :-)
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Teresa and Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote:

On Wed, 31 May 2006 14:33:38 -0400, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:

  

I will be most interested to read it, but the manpage reader is horrible
to try to work from



If you use KDE, press Alt-F2 and type '#portage' to get an HTML version
of the man page. Or you could use man2html to convert individual man
pages.


  


Cheater.  :p  ;-)

Dale
:-) :-)
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Reconstructing a Gentoo Installer Computer

2006-05-31 Thread Jeremy Olexa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Timothy A. Holmes wrote:

 Ryan - -
 
 Thanks for the links - 
 
 Is that info also accessable on the web some place, since I cant print
 from linux based systems, and especially cant under the live CD?
 
 I will be most interested to read it, but the manpage reader is horrible
 to try to work from
 
 TIM



http://gentoo-wiki.com/Index:MAN



- --
Jeremy Olexa
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Office: EE/CS 1-201
CS/IT Systems Staff
University of Minnesota

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEfm/uFN7pD9kMi/URAjNkAJ9wrGqFXDvROBNHYCGbqKyreaQrpQCeO28u
/0vQ868X8kZEo6fVIrR8ntI=
=L8Xp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list